Added: 3 months ago
From: RonPaul2008dotcom
Views: 14,642
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (235)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • His economic logic is beyond flawed

  • @APUsoccer09 How so?

  • i would also like to hear this explanation

  • politifact exposes ron paul's lies about the economy. this actual idiot and the rest of his loony followers actually think the fed printed 16 trillion dollars! batshit insane

    check it out, its all on politifact

  • @manhunter9 "At first blush, it appears Paul understates the situation. Between December, 2007 and July, 2010, more than $16 trillion passed from the Fed to the biggest banks, both domestic banks and subsidiaries of foreign-owned institutions. Tally up the amounts that went to subsidiaries, and about $6 trillion went to banks such as Barclays and the Royal Bank of Scotland."- politifact

  • @manhunter9 you're pathetic

  • Do you idiots really think he will help cut the deficit, in fact I think he will quadruple it.

  • @sambam2694 Then you better start thinking.

  • @sambam2694 Then again, thinking was never your strong suit

  • If we are to really understand the root cause of our economic problems, we should take a hard look at the powers of Congress in the Constitution. Especially, that power of Congress "to borrow money on the credit of the United States". This is where all fiat money originates, from the power of politicians to steal wealth from their electorates. Until people around the world realize this fraud, there will be continuous crises for years to come.

  • This is how i can tell that Ron Paul is the real deal. He isn't reading from a piece of paper with the information written by someone else. He barely looks down because this man knows what he's talking about, he speaks his mind, he doesn't sound scripted.

  • It's not enough to say "Vote Ron Paul"

    PEOPLE NEED TO SWITCH PARTIES 12 WEEKS IN ADVANCE OF THE PRIMARIES IN MOST STATES.

    IF YOU DO NOT SWITCH IN TIME YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.

    IF YOU ARE NOT REGISTERED REPUBLICAN YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.

    IF RON PAUL DOES NOT WIN PRIMARY, NO GENERAL ELECTION ! REGISTER AS A REPUBLICAN. FIND OUT WHEN YOUR STATE HAS PRIMARIES. FIND OUT WHERE AND VOTE VOTE VOTE ! PLEASE !

    WE NEED EVERY LAST VOTE ! Copy and paste this everywhere

  • Love this man. Pray he gets the nomination or we're finished.

  • Money is actually created out of thin air .. do you due diligence about QE's and get back to me on that eh.

  • Rule by fear and guilt has no end game save enslavement.

  • PRESSTITUTE GLOBAL MEDIA PAWNING AMERICAN SHEEPLE AS USUAL

    WORLD WATCHES ON - AMERICAN MEDIA IS ON THE TRUMAN SHOW

    DO THEY KNOW THAT?

    END THE FED OR FEED THE END !

    THE MEDIA SHOULD BE READYING TO QUESTION THE FED, THE WAR ROOMS AND 9/11 TRUTHS, BAILOUTS FOR WALL STREET BUBBLES, ETC.

    READ THE CONSTITUTION AND STOP WASTING RONS TIME WITH MORE QUESTIONS

    MAKE SENSE?

    ♥ RON PAUL ♥ RON PAUL ♥ RON PAUL ♥ HE WINS HEARTS NOT JUST VOTES

    NOW WHO DAT WHO DAT

  • When you open a can of WHOOP ASS, Ron Paul jumps out.

  • capitalism is my religion and ron paul is my god!

    amen.

    (stupid americans)

  • @TheDenknach WHEN AMERICAN STOP WORSHIP THE DIME AS THEIR GOD THEIR LIFE WOULD BE MUCH BETTER

  • @haifab1 true

  • @TheDenknach, Americans didn't invent money, greed or slavery and we certainly didn't invent religion.

    Like any other migrating people they brought with them what they knew and had.

    And if you want to get into an argument about war mongering and greed, lets hope you're not from Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Russia, China, Turkey, etc.

    You haven't read much in the ways of Antiquities have you?

  • @rcandrews wtf?

  • @TheDenknach Your reply is a question. Guess what history does best, besides entertaining us?

    It repeats itself throughout our (human) existence.

  • @zWzld I know what you mean, but it's the system we need change and that is much harder to change with voting. Instead if we embraced what Ron Paul advocates "the freedom to choose" simply choose to not support huge mega ultra corporations that want to shit on everyone. If that means adjusting your values and going with out then so be it. That's what being mature and responsible means and we've forgotten that all around the world.

  • It makes you grin to think of RON PAUL vs BHO on stage debating. Barry might just barf. GET REGISTERED & GO VOTE

  • While I agree Ron Paul is probably the most enabled Candidate in the running I severely doubt he'll be able to fix very many things, if anything at all. But that's not an attack on his character but rather a statement against the system that "every" president has to operate in. In theory he's only got (at a maximum) of 8 years to correct hundreds of years of building corruption and bull shit policy.

    I feel that the day of modern day Democracy is over and it must evolve at a grass roots level.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist Representative Republic.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist , So are you implying you are just going to keep on voting for the establishment that started us down this path so many years ago?

    And by the way Ron Paul and The Revolution began decades ago. Ron Paul is The Revolutionary President.

    He is not only the smartest guy in the field on both sides of the fence he is THE only candidate that understands The Constitution and what 1776 was all about.

  • @rcandrews No. I'm implying that until the population of the country changes it's value system it doesn't matter who is in charge. It's a machine that self perpetuates itself. We are ALL in this together. Not just America. What the world does, affects the world sooner or later.

    The Constitution while remarkable in it's day is out of date now. Just like the Bible is. It fails to take into account how much society and technology has moved forward. It needs to be upgraded.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist, I respectfully disagree.

    Globalization has created more problems than fixed any. This idea that we all can live under one doctrine is beyond absurd and besides that, I have the right to not belong to such a One World Order.

    Had “we” all stayed out of each other’s affairs there would be no wars, global control by the Power Elite, financial / social crisis’s, save for the ones that happen with in the borders of sovereign state.

  • @rcandrews You can disagree all you want it doesn't mean you are correct. What happens in one part of the world invariably afflicts the rest of it on at least some level. If the world is going to be connected through trade and socially through the internet you can't have a "peeing" section in the pool (so to speak).

    I'm not sure what you mean about a One World Order but there is already one. It's called natural law. The laws that govern the physical and emotional reality of the planet.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist , In philosophy, the natural order is the moral source from which natural law seeks to derive its authority.

    It is a philosophy I thought we were "talking" about reality and in reality you cannot expect one doctrine to govern 7 billion people., without having taken way too many hits off the peyote pipe.

    By the way Quantitative Easing is nothing but legal counterfeiting.

  • @rcandrews Just like in "Reality" there can't be airplanes? Or the Earth can't be round? Or that the sun must orbit the Earth? All diseases and illnesses are the cause of sin and dark demons right?

    There already is a doctrine that is governing 7 billion people, globalization as you might call it? Sure it's doing a terrible job for the majority but it is none the less governing the planet.

    I have no clue why you brought up Quantitative easing.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist I brought up QE's because like history it REALLY matters.

    How long do you think fake money will sustain the "one world thing" you have come to embrace so much of can last given law and order?

  • @rcandrews I don't embrace any currency what-so-ever. That must have just been an assumption of yours. I don't currently condone many of the systems in place today.

  • @rcandrews History does matter like you said. Look into the history of man kind and currency and you'll notice the pattern. Where there is a will, there is a way. Every currency sooner or later results in the kings and queens reigning supreme over the common folk who aren't driven by endless power hungry agendas.

    This is exactly what happened with the gold standard. I honestly don't understand how even if we did return to it we wouldn't see the exact same kind of scenario unfold again. Do you?

  • @enticed2zeitgeist, And on that smaller scale problems are much easier to address and contain. Nowadays a guy farts in Greece the world implodes.

    Instead of village idiots beating each other up with sticks and stones we have world wars with nuclear tactical weapons.

    Instead of localized economic downturns we have epic economic global failure.

    There has never been a better time to buy local and stay local, save a 235 years ago.

  • @rcandrews "And on that smaller scale problems are much easier to address and contain. Nowadays a guy farts in Greece the world implodes." Which proves exactly my point. We are all connected. So if we accept this reality doesn't it make sense to toss away the systems we have in place that no longer function correctly?

    Society and ideas move forward, that's why the solutions have to move forward as well. You can't solve a new problem with an old solution.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist , yes you can. Make everybody live within their means. It is known as The Gold Standard.

  • @rcandrews "make" the key word. How do you think you make people do anything? Laws. What do laws require... enforcement and interpretation. This is where police and courts and lawyers come into play. Police and courts and lawyers are all prone to areas of corruption. This is why the chance of having a permanent gold standard is laughable at best. It's what we started with and look at what it turned into.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist Try and follow this OK?

    Compassion by governemnt force is coercion.

    But by actually making "money" be backed by a commodity, such as gold and silver is more prudent and prosperous for all.

    Because it LIMITS everyone.

  • @rcandrews No it doesn't. What limits people is the belief in the system. This is where the whole argument of returning to a gold standard falls apart. In the end it's still the same thing. The wide spread adoption of seeing value in a physical or assumed object which doesn't contain intrinsic or inherent value. This is why no concept of any currency can ever stay the same. The greedy and the power corrupt can always find ways of manipulating it.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist, I don't think you have studied the theory of value in depth to make that sort of statement, especially when it comes to precious metals.

    It is not the same thing. Printing counterfeit money is not using The Gold Standard in anyway shape or form.

    And had we stuck to it and not allowed government to control it we would not be in the sad position we are in.

  • @rcandrews I'm not sure you understand what intrinsic value is. If you were abandoned on an island think about the things you would want to take with you... not gold or silly metal coins but objects and resources that will permit you to prosper with the Environment. And I'm not talking about barter either. I'm talking about some completely other radical idea ;)

  • @enticed2zeitgeist you contradicted yourself there... gold/silver are objects/resources, there is no such thing as intrinsic value all value is subjective to each individual.

  • @djdnauk1977 Some things are subjective to each individual. However all life in general has some very specific requirements, healthy food, clean air, drinkable water, a dry and warm shelter. Let's talk about the basics first. No precious metal directly gives you any of those things. Let's get back to basics. We can talk about shiny jewelry and luxuries when the planet is fed, housed and clothed.

    Gold and precious metals have a place for sure in Electronics and other modern engineering feats.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist all things are subjective, it depends on who we are & where we are. for example diamonds are more valuable than water because theyre rarer... but in a desert the opposite is true, all value is subjective. yes we have needs but again those needs are subjective, you could put everyone into cages & feed them nutrient gruel & theyd be healthy but miserable,u have to consider happiness, so feeding/clothing the planet, while a nobel cause! wont solve our problems

  • @djdnauk1977 "diamonds are more valuable than water because theyre rarer" no they are not, at least not in a survival sense because you can't drink or eat a diamond. I'm coming from a survival sense because that is exactly what humanities problem will be in the not so distant future. While feeding/clothing people in a noble idea it actually is part of solving ALL of the worlds problems because when people are more equal they get along better. When people get along better... think about it.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist Obviously you can't eat or drink diamonds or gold, but you can trade those objects to other humans in exchange for food and water (or dollars). That's what makes diamonds a good way to store wealth (i.e. your body's previous labor) in a nice compact form

    .

  • @electrictroy2010 Yes, that is obvious. But that's what makes it a bad source for storing wealth. It's value is so intangible because it's not directly useful to the human. All precious metals like gold and silver and diamonds... they only have perceived wealth. Just like fiat currency. It takes everyone believing they are valuable for them to be valuable whereas resources that can be directly consumed and use by a human is intrinsically valuable.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist gold & silver have intrinsic value because they are scare & useful (electronics all require gold/silver etc...) whereas fiat money is worthless because its just paper, the only thing that gives fiat money value, is the fact governments FORCE us to use it by threatening us with violence if we dont.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist like i said, diamonds are more valuable when water is abundant! so youre just agreeing with me... we dont live in a survival sense, technology & trade allow us to move beyond that. i agree things improve when people get along better! thats why we need to STOP governments using violence against peaceful people via wars, taxation & victimless crimes etc... government is violence nothing more.

  • @djdnauk1977 I'm not going to going to try and make my point anymore. If you think that we should be focusing on encouraging people to believe there is value in objects which actually have no value beyond cultural influence then we are just going to have chalk this one up as moral differences.

    To think that people should be focusing on anything at the moment besides taking care of the planet and feeding, housing, and educating the masses makes me question what this world will be in the future.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist , by the way there was a time when that guy farting in Greece was of no consequence to anybody.

    It wasn't until globalization and fake money came into play that made his "ass gas" matter.

  • @rcandrews Yea just like at one point all food was organic and the oceans were teeming with fish. We don't live in that world anymore. We live in a world where we must learn to share and accept the "real' limits thrust upon us by natural limits and laws.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist Food didn't stop being organic until genetic altering of food became legal and guess how let that shit happen?

    Monsanto an guess who is the current administrations Food Safety Czar is?

    The VP of Monsanto. Feel like a sheep yet?

  • @rcandrews One of the original reason for genetically modifying food came from the concept of producing excess food for starving pockets of the planet. A noble concept, obviously it didn't work out that way. Now we have monsters like Monsanto threatening food security all across the planet. I agree with you there. I'm not trying to say Genetically modified food is good, I'm saying we live in a world where the circumstances are different than that of the gold standard days.

  • @rcandrews that should have read "guess who let that happen?"

  • I also want to add I'm not disrespecting you. I do value your statements and I'm enjoying our discussion.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist back'actcha man.

  • I agree on the local thing. "Think global, act local". Do what you can locally, and understand that you are part of the whole.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist kind of hard to do when the laws being enacted don't give us that option.

  • @rcandrews Laws come and go, are forgotten and side stepped. Man made laws really don't mean anything except the acknowledgement of a problem and the lack of a real solution.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist real solutions like most truths can't be handled or appreciated.

    If "we" don't or can't find our way back to The Gold Standard I assure you this global economic collapse will only get worse before it gets better.

  • @rcandrews What about letting go of the idea of currency altogether? Have you ever considered that? It's a lot easier to think about human requirements (such as sustaining the planet, equality etc) with out having to always balance a budget at the end of the day. I know it sounds completely different than anything that's ever been tried before but isn't that exactly the kind of thinking we need to get out of this mess?

    Obviously the ramifications and requirements of this are huge.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist , because the days of barter trade are never coming back to the extent enough to correct things and F.A. Hayek's idea of "money" will not work either.

    If I had more than 500 words I could go into detail how money even came about. Mankind has placed value on all kinds of things in order to do trade.

    At this point in order to "fix it", it is going to require the likes of Ron Paul leveling the playing field.

  • @enticed2zeitgeist also think about what you just posted "laws come and go" and the way I see it, that's the problem.

    I mean what is the point in even having them if they aren't going to be enforced and or disregarded?

  • @rcandrews There is no point in having them. That's exactly my point. Why have laws when you can have solutions instead. Instead of speed limits wouldn't it make sense to just simply make traffic safer to go faster?

  • Ron Paul diagnosing the the United States' illness like a DOCTOR!

  • @Ndawgie That's Dr. Ron Paul*

  • RP-2012 

  • Reality is the bank gives up NO lawful consideration of value in any phony loan to one of us, Banks are a fiction & a thief we don't need simply because they steal circulation by issuing phony loans to us obfuscating our own promissory obligations we have to each other where interest is never created or issued into circulation thus stealing & laundering circulation into the hands of the mere publishers of OUR promissory obligations who risk jack & give up jack in any phony loan to one of us.

  • The gold standard gave birth to fractional multiplication because there was never enough of it to keep up with growth by you taking out phony loans introducing principal only into circulation. Interest paid to the bank by YOU depletes circulation that only ever consisted of some principal at most. Even if there was enough gold the banks would still steal it just like fiat today causing a perpetual shortage in circulation where gov has to borrow back all the stolen money to re inflate circulation

  • Why did Nixon pull the gold standard? Because the physical gold reserves where depleting WHY? Because the banks were stealing & laundering the gold reserves by charged interest when you took out phony loans from the banks? Reality is all money represents your own promissory obligations (money creation) There was never enough gold to represent all phony loans to start with so continue the theft of your labor & production they introduced fiat only to prolong the theft of your labor & production.

  • @chotaboy66 The real question is why did Andrew Jackson ingrain The Spoils System into the voting process to the extent that he did?

    The next question to ask yourself is why did Woodrow Wilson allow The Federal Reserve to even exist in the first place?

    And then ask yourself why it is William Clinton put the final nails into The Glass-Stegal Act of 1933?

  • @rcandrews Regulation can only temper or prolong ultimate monetary destruction at best.

    1) Dose Glass-Stegal address what consideration of value a bank gives up of its own in any purported loan to one of us ?

    2) Dose Glass-Stegal address the purposed banking obfuscation of our very own promissory obligations we have to each other ?

    If the Glass-Stegal Act doesn't address these 2 very important issues ,well it can only be a poor attempt to preserve the very banks who rob us today .

  • @chotaboy66 ,

    First of all The FED should have never been allowed to form, hence my 2nd question to you, the simple fact is at least The Glass-Stegal Act of 1933 prevented commercial banks from taking on too much risk with depositors' money.

    Don’t forget the reason GSA was introduced was because of commercial speculation being too speculative.

    Underwriting bad loans is exactly what led to the 2008-banking bust. In addition to that GSA also kept these banks form becoming too big to fail.

  • @rcandrews Like I said regulation can only temper or prolong ultimate monetary destruction because GSA doesn't address what consideration of value a bank gives up in any loan to us? Which is nothing & it doesn't address how the banks purposefully obfuscate our very own promissory obligations we have to each other which allows ALL BANKS to steal & launder the monetary circulation . So I'm sorry your GSA will do jack because it doesn't address the root problem of all economic destruction.

  • @chotaboy66, if you think money is the root of all economic destruction you are sadly mistaken, greed is and GSA at least put the breaks on it.

    And not all banks are evil and operate in such a manner only the ones that have been allowed to become too big to fail.

  • @rcandrews No its not money itself its every banks intervention on our promissory obligations we have to each other when we only purport to borrow money which is the process of money creation.The banks purposed intervention actually imposes a falsified debt to its self by fraud allowing the bank to take out or STEAL MORE out of the pool of circulation than what WE CREATE in essentially, no such thing as a good bank NO EXCEPTIONS because they ALL steal & launder circulation on conception .

  • @chotaboy66 , OK first of all banks don't write monetary policy, Uncle Scam does.

    Want to stop banks from controlling Uncle Scam, limit the puppet and the strings are rendered useless.

  • @rcandrews If the bank cant prove or demonstrate what it offers of consideration of value or what gives up that has value well All banks are breaking the fundamentals of contract law , having said that if a bank cant prove what consideration of value of its own it gives up in any purported loan to one of us means there is no contract thus there is no debt ? Moreover the bank doesn't sign the contractual obligation only the purported borrower did so its really a promissory note MONEY CREATION.

  • @chotaboy66 You have this thing about money creation.

    So, if you kindly can explain to me what you think money should be "money" because if you think F.A. Hayek's idea is any different from QE's are, you seriously need to do a little more due diligence.

    With all due respect.

  • @rcandrews All Money represents our very own promissory obligations , It doesn't matter if its represented by fiat, gold, or rum the banks still steal it & launder it into the hands of the mere publishers of our promissory obligations,any Austrian economic doctrine is flawed simply because it advocates interest which is the very cause of falsified terminal indebtedness . I ask you to think a 43 year old " proof " of solution called mathematically Perfected Economy before its too late for us all.

  • @rcandrews Sorry to bust your bubble but the bank is a fiction & in reality money is not created out of thin air or as a debt because WE really create it when we sign a banks phony loan contract . Youtube a video of mine called ,Money as debt ( DEBUNKED ) . Once one sees the banking fraud starts on the ground floor where we really create money & its stolen & laundered back as national debt one will wake up to how the banks really work & then take steps to free one self by leading ones own self.

  • Dr Ron Paul is a role model for all politicians.

  • gold holds value....worthless paper dollars don't.

  • Why is this guy so obsessed with gold. It's just a pretty rock.

  • @caseybv74 Because gold can be traded for anything. Someone might offer to mow your yard because they want your old t.v. set, but you might not need your yard mowed, but if they offer you gold you might be more willing to trade because you in turn can use the gold to buy whatever you want. Paper money used to be backed by gold so that you didn't actually have to carry around gold.

  • @Aahlookoutbehindyou I don't see how thats any different than fiat currency.

  • RonPaul2008dotcom I hope your listening please use these tags in the video, gold standard, fed, federal reserve, inflation, 2007 crises, printing, money, economic history, jobs, unemployment, Shrinking middle class, taxes, housing crash, bailout.

    People who want to know about economic will be guided to this video.

  • As somebody who lives in Darwin, Australia......I sure hope you get in!!!

    For the sake of peace....Vote Ron Paul 2012

  • @bluoz62 Oh you bet! You have every right to be concerned, because Obama is sending thousands of marines to occupy your country.

  • Hey..!!!!!!!! Why did u STOP RECORDING>>? This is my TV now since I cannot rely on anything I see on the News. I need to know what is really being said since the media is incapable of showing us what the truth is...

  • Ron Paul as well as many economists have been talking about this for a long time. I hope this time around people will listen...

  • Dr helen caldicott is an amazing lady. she has videos explaining the reality of the industrial military complex.

    Sure - Ron Paul will save you. He's just so different from every other puppet on a string. 

  • Anyone actually interested in the truth:

    leuren moret is here on youtube and describes perfectly what is happening. It's time to wake up. wake up. Ron Paul is part of the paradigm of deceit.

  • thumbnail to this vid looks like a mobster ron paul gunning down rowdy audience members. just sayin =P

  • First to understand the economic crisis u have to understand the banks.When we deposit promisary notes in an account.Your SIGNATURE then becomes a bond. A bond to pay off national debt.That bond then turns into a trust because they trust us now.That trust becomes an IOU.Last I checked u can't pay a debt with an IOU.Fiat money is criminal.

  • The cost of evil .

  • From the richest creditor nation with the smallest government,, to a gigantic debtor nation with big government.

  • the truth teller speaks..and..he seems to be the only candidate NOT using that retarded phrase used by Obama, Mittens, and all the others trying to make us feel good; 'american exceptionalism'...the only thing exceptional and american is our national treasure Ron Paul, who should be our president in 2012.

  • @telemetry9 uhhh....fail

  • @telemetry9 Dude, WTF!? If he was a puppet, the media would have been all over him from the very beginning. For once, an honest politician comes around, and you won't even give him a chance. Enough with your conspiracy theories.

  • Why does this video cut out prematurely?

  • If anyone just listened to Ron Paul's speeches and read his proposed policies they would vote for him. Fair media coverage is all his platform needs to succeed. 

  • BlueRepublican (.)ORG

  • support RonPaul2012 but are a registered Democrat?

    Become a blue republican!

    BlueRepublican(.)com

  • I would never vote for this guy, for one he is no lawyer and I would not vote for anyone who doesn't have a law degree. Second, he is too radical and his reading of the Constitution is only one way to look at it. Also, there really is no problem with the economy, gridlock is good. If you wanna make money then invest in Chinese construction companies like I have for the last 10 years. I rake in over 10% every year, fuck domestic investing.

  • @MaiLingDolly I really don't think anyone could take anything you said seriously if you truly think there is nothing wrong with the economy and that your investing is sustainable. Furthermore you don't need to have a law degree to understand laws or what is or is not working, the information is out there to teach yourself, most people are just too lazy to do their own research.

  • I also support Ron Paul. Please spread the word. This man is the right choice. I have to pray now.

  • @Bigturns33 I am a Ron Paul supporter. I'm just being realistic. He would beat Obama but it would not be that easy.

  • @MattsPolitics1

    im sure it could be - obama has gotten stumped & has stuttered on a whole bunch of things

    BOY, I'm I look forward to that showdown!!!!!! ;D

  • @MattsPolitics1 It would not be that easy for Ron Paul to get voted up to that point, that is true. When RP does end up debating obama, obama isn't going to have a teleprompter and he will actually have to respond to RPs un-original statements. I strongly believe that Obama will have a hard time staying on topic and coming up with intelligent rebuttles and still responding to the question or comments

  • @Bigturns33 not necessarily...liberals main stance against Ron paul is that he plays in favor of the corporations. So Obama will use this to his advantage. Even if Obama is blatantly wrong, Ron Paul will still have a hard time convincing some of the closeminded, and slogan addicted left wingers.

  • Ron Paul is absolutely amazing! He is the only real choice for President!

    If you are a democrat, you have been led astray by our current leader who has done nothing for the people or our country.The drug war is ramped up again more than ever. The wars overseas are continuing. We're keeping our hundreds of bases all over the world open. The Federal Reserve is operating in secrecy, stealing our money, causing most of our financial problems and it is still in operation. Ron Paul is the answer 2012!

  • @PlowedClouds I agree with you and would add that Republicans have also been led astray by self-serving political hacks like the NWO loving Bushes, McCain, Boehner, Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham, etc. The average Democrat politician is a fast track to hell, and the average Republican politician is just slightly slower, as they're all owned by the same Globalist NWO Banksters. Time for real Americans to give up the Left/Right paradigm and unite to vote in a true American like Ron Paul.

  • @PlowedClouds bless ur brain! wht can we do 2 get every1 else 2 speak like u... perhaps a sledge hammer of knowledge? or arrest every1 whose planning on voting 4 anyone other than RP and thro them in jail till the election is over and RP is in office? or do we just throw the current rep candidates in jail instead?? all jokes aside tho, he truly is the only president for the first time that ive been so passionate about and hes the only one that actually gives me real hope. thx 4 not being a sheep

  • "Unlike my opponents, I'm not running from my voting record. I'm not running from my public statements. I'm not running from my predictions. I'm running on them." - Ron Paul *** OurName4Freedom

  • You can tell everything he saying he truly believe in it, that's why he never needs a Teleprompter when he makes his speeches.

  • @iTitanium Dr. Ron Paul is AUTHENTIC or GENUINE!!.... in a political world of Pretense, Pandering, Greased-Palms, Double-Speak, and Pathological Liars in Both Parties

  • Ron paul would destroy obama in a debate. Could you imagine him debating him on the number one issue, the economy. It would be game set and match and really the GOP should love that. The problem is that they are STATUS QUO.

  • @Bigturns33 Indeed. Obama could only spew epithets and describe invalid emotional scenarios that are ultimately inapplicable to the debate.

    Ron Paul would explain his position in such a way that voters would UNDERSTAND what is happening, what needs to be done, and how he, as president, could work toward those goals.

  • @Bigturns33 i don't think it would really matter because obama was put there to take the blame of the people pulling his strings and they count on him messing up so that the next puppet can take the stage but unfortunately for them that person is Ron Paul. RON PAUL 2012!

  • @zwiiyt Why are they even there, what do they say anyway?

  • the doctor has made a diagnosis. let him operate. vote in ron paul in 2012.

  • As a former big supporter of Obama...

  • bluerepublican dt org has all the info and links and dates for every caucus in every state. Go there and you can register to vote, find out if you must be republican, join the republican party, if needed, and learn the date of your state's caucus. Fifteen minutes, and then all you have to do is show up to the caucus.

  • RON PAUL 2012!

    america has the obama blues.

    click if you suffer from these blues

  • I wish Ron Paul was my grandfather.

  • THIS COUNTRY NEEDS A DIVORCE!

    .

    we are not going to figure this out. it is mathematical: we have 50% of the country that would still vote Obama, even with all the wars, $1t deficits, 25% under-/unemployment, 45m food stamp recipients.

    every year, more and more become dependent on the government, in one way or another. these people are not going to have the will to renounce govt. and it is Obama's job to grow that dependency.

    the future can only get bleaker and bleaker. again, it is the math

  • "How would you explain the economic crisis?"

    "It's in the shitter."

    "And what, then, is the solution to the economic crisis?"

    "Ron Paul."

  • This was excellent. Now where's the rest of exposition?

  • We Must Cut spending. Vote for people who Understand what needs to be done. Otherwise our great nation will be lead by FOOLS further into Bankruptsy

  • Really wish the whole video was posted.. Would have liked to hear what Dr. Paul had to say about NATO