@micfranklin 6 rings is better than nice with a team who still have ounces of opportunities to make the Superbowl as often as they want. And there's really no point in arguing about whether or not this team of today can claim six, because either way We still have it. I mean you're talking about a team that was on the verge of claiming 7. This team would have claimed 3, Organization 7. All together 7. What differences does it make. We as fans say we claim 6 not the team.
@micfranklin And another thing, You talk about 2009 when we lost to mediocre teams. My team takes full responsibility for letting such things happen to them that season, but you also have got to remember they were just coming off a Superbowl hangover that year. So In addition, they had a reason to look beat up that year. Can't say the same for the Ravens though. I mean even at they're best, your team still couldn't get the job done. *Cough* 2011 *Cough* Pretty pathetic if you ask me!
@micfranklin And no matter how many times we have to rely on a player to get us to the Superbowl and back, we still have done it more than the Ravens had. Compared to your lonely one Superbowl appearance in 2000, which was over 12 years ago & our 3 SB appearances in 6 years and winning 2 of them. That speaks volume on who the better overall team is. You talk about your team not relying on a player, but what really did they get out of it? In reference to Championship winnings?
And another difference between us and the Steelers is that our D doesn't solely rely on one player like the Steelers does. Exhibit A: Troy Polamalu missing most of the 2009 season and the Steelers were losing to pretty mediocre teams. Compare that to 2010 when Ed Reed missed the first 6 games and yet the Ravens went 4-2 in that time.
To be honest, I wouldn't laugh about us losing to broncos. You're team couldn't even beat the Jags, the Seahawks or the Titans. And I don't know why you raven fans are so angry, your team won 2 super bowls this season already! Remember the Gatorade baths? LMAO.
And if my team have to lose in the Superbowl again, at least they can say they've been there for the 4th time in over 7 or 8 years. Whereas your team is still trying to find a way to go to their second one in over 12 years. They beat us twice, wins the AFC North, goes all the way to the championship and choke it away...again! I mean, you raven fans should be use to it by now. Then you laugh at us for losing to the broncos. The Ravens or Broncos don't have 6 rings to fall back on when they lose.
The point you Raven fans seem to be missing is that, You Guys Lost! Lost in the playoffs for the second time in a row. Dating back to 09. You're team choked that Championship game also. Yeah, The Steelers lost to the broncos, but at least they don't lose in the playoffs as often as you guys. Remember, The Steelers organization have 6 superbowls credit to them. They can't win every big game. Unlike the Ravens, The Steelers have a much better chance at making another SB run than your team.
@Steelcitygurl1 Yeah that's why the Ravens had a better record, made it farther than the FIRST ROUND, didn't lose to the Broncos in the first play of OT, and beat the Shittsburgh Squeelers both games they played! You make no point!
@ROCKtheRED34 If you actually took the time out to read what I wrote, than you would see I actually make a valid point. You're based in everything off on one season. I'm talking about how your team can't get it done when it matters. I'm not ruling out the ravens beating us and us losing to the Broncos. There's a total difference between the Ravens and the Steelers. For an example, A 9-7 Steelers have a better chance of making the SB than a 12-4 Ravens team. Sad for you, but true.
@Steelcitygurl1 I wouldn't get too comfy with that, lets take a look back at the Steelers after their last SB win and how they really haven't been better than the Ravens. If a 9-7 Steelers had a better shot then we should've seen that happen already, but it didn't. And BTW your 6 SB rings don't mean anything in 2012 because 4 of them came well before the Ravens existed and each ring only says how good the Steelers were that year.
@micfranklin LMAO!, So you're saying that the Steelers superbowl winnings back in the 70s don't mean a damn thing now, because The Ravens never existed then? Yeah, Your right, What was I thinking. I mean you were only the Cleveland Browns then until you moved to that rat hole city known as Baltimore. So basically the "Ravens" were around then they were just too busy playing in Cleveland. And yet, even in that time zone, They still couldn't stop the Steelers from winning 4 SBs! lol
@Steelcitygurl1 Let me rephrase that: 6 rings is nice but winning 4 of them a long time ago doesn't mean your team is the shit now, it only shows how good they at that point in history. If I may compare, look at the Cowboys: they have 5 rings because they were extremely good the years they won them, but 5 rings doesn't mean they're good now seeing as how they haven't been going to the playoffs the last few years.
@micfranklin Just because the steelers had a few down fall seasons doesn't mean they are anywhere near to what the cowboys of today look like. They are at this point far from it. It's obvious that you're either not comprehending to what I'm saying or you just don't care how it's said. I never said, The steelers of today look anything like the Steelers of the 70s. No team of today look anything like those teams anymore. Times changed, Rules and rules and more rules changed!!
@micfranklin The Steelers of today are that good when they want to be, but not anywhere great than the ones of the 70s. The years where football was actually played like football, and not like touch football! If anything, The Steelers are still writing they're success story as of today with a few glitches, whereas the Cowboys are writing about the drought they've been going through since the late 90s. Who knows maybe they'll write about winning the Superbowl next year. u never know!
@micfranklin 6 rings is better than nice with a team who still have ounces of opportunities to make the Superbowl as often as they want. And there's really no point in arguing about whether or not this team of today can claim six, because either way We still have it. I mean you're talking about a team that was on the verge of claiming 7. This team would have claimed 3, Organization 7. All together 7. What differences does it make. We as fans say we claim 6 not the team.
@micfranklin 6 rings is better than nice with a team who still have ounces of opportunities to make the Superbowl as often as they want. And there's really no point in arguing about whether or not this team of today can claim six, because either way We still have it. I mean you're talking about a team that was on the verge of claiming 7. This team would have claimed 3, Organization 7. All together 7. What differences does it make. We as fans say we claim 6 not the team.
@micfranklin@micfranklin 6 rings is better than nice with a team who still have ounces of opportunities to make the Superbowl as often as they want. And there's really no point in arguing about whether or not this team of today can claim six, because either way We still have it. I mean you're talking about a team that was on the verge of claiming 7. This team would have claimed 3, Organization 7. All together 7. What differences does it make. We as fans say we claim 6 not the team.
@micfranklin 6 rings is better than nice with a team who still have ounces of opportunities to make the Superbowl as often as they want. And there's really no point in arguing about whether or not this team of today can claim six, because either way We still have it. I mean you're talking about a team that was on the verge of claiming 7. This team would have claimed 3, Organization 7. All together 7. What differences does it make. We as fans say we claim 6 not the team.
@valliant98baltimore did put up a real good game against new england ravens in the super bowl if that td pass was held onto for a second later...im from new england and ill admit we got a lil lucky but that was a nice defensive play on our part
Yea that's what all rats fans are going to do when Ed Reed takes his no tackling ass off the field this season without a ring (Ball so Hard) along with THUGS and Rice...Old man Ray Ray you know the guy with a knife in his sock has one but that's where it ends.
NY is the best in every sport. fuck baltimore
TheErko52 1 week ago
@TheErko52 Excuse me, Baltimore is a beautiful city with a great football team, guess the SB champs are jealous of B-more, Haters Gonna Hate!!
TimTebowParodies 1 week ago
@TheErko52 Go troll somewhere else a good football fan can tell if a team is good and baltimore has skill give em that
PortsmouthSk8ters 6 days ago
Best LB/DE He took Lewiss spotlight...
imOGClan 1 week ago
And now Sizzle is Defensive Player of the Year.
micfranklin 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@micfranklin 6 rings is better than nice with a team who still have ounces of opportunities to make the Superbowl as often as they want. And there's really no point in arguing about whether or not this team of today can claim six, because either way We still have it. I mean you're talking about a team that was on the verge of claiming 7. This team would have claimed 3, Organization 7. All together 7. What differences does it make. We as fans say we claim 6 not the team.
Steelcitygurl1 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@micfranklin And another thing, You talk about 2009 when we lost to mediocre teams. My team takes full responsibility for letting such things happen to them that season, but you also have got to remember they were just coming off a Superbowl hangover that year. So In addition, they had a reason to look beat up that year. Can't say the same for the Ravens though. I mean even at they're best, your team still couldn't get the job done. *Cough* 2011 *Cough* Pretty pathetic if you ask me!
Steelcitygurl1 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@micfranklin And no matter how many times we have to rely on a player to get us to the Superbowl and back, we still have done it more than the Ravens had. Compared to your lonely one Superbowl appearance in 2000, which was over 12 years ago & our 3 SB appearances in 6 years and winning 2 of them. That speaks volume on who the better overall team is. You talk about your team not relying on a player, but what really did they get out of it? In reference to Championship winnings?
Steelcitygurl1 2 weeks ago
And another difference between us and the Steelers is that our D doesn't solely rely on one player like the Steelers does. Exhibit A: Troy Polamalu missing most of the 2009 season and the Steelers were losing to pretty mediocre teams. Compare that to 2010 when Ed Reed missed the first 6 games and yet the Ravens went 4-2 in that time.
micfranklin 2 weeks ago
the exact same video is to country shit
Whitenation55 3 weeks ago
kanye west ruined this awesome song
tebowisgay 4 weeks ago
To be honest, I wouldn't laugh about us losing to broncos. You're team couldn't even beat the Jags, the Seahawks or the Titans. And I don't know why you raven fans are so angry, your team won 2 super bowls this season already! Remember the Gatorade baths? LMAO.
Steelcitygurl1 4 weeks ago
And if my team have to lose in the Superbowl again, at least they can say they've been there for the 4th time in over 7 or 8 years. Whereas your team is still trying to find a way to go to their second one in over 12 years. They beat us twice, wins the AFC North, goes all the way to the championship and choke it away...again! I mean, you raven fans should be use to it by now. Then you laugh at us for losing to the broncos. The Ravens or Broncos don't have 6 rings to fall back on when they lose.
Steelcitygurl1 4 weeks ago
The point you Raven fans seem to be missing is that, You Guys Lost! Lost in the playoffs for the second time in a row. Dating back to 09. You're team choked that Championship game also. Yeah, The Steelers lost to the broncos, but at least they don't lose in the playoffs as often as you guys. Remember, The Steelers organization have 6 superbowls credit to them. They can't win every big game. Unlike the Ravens, The Steelers have a much better chance at making another SB run than your team.
Steelcitygurl1 4 weeks ago
@Steelcitygurl1 Yeah that's why the Ravens had a better record, made it farther than the FIRST ROUND, didn't lose to the Broncos in the first play of OT, and beat the Shittsburgh Squeelers both games they played! You make no point!
ROCKtheRED34 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Steelcitygurl1 3 weeks ago
@ROCKtheRED34 If you actually took the time out to read what I wrote, than you would see I actually make a valid point. You're based in everything off on one season. I'm talking about how your team can't get it done when it matters. I'm not ruling out the ravens beating us and us losing to the Broncos. There's a total difference between the Ravens and the Steelers. For an example, A 9-7 Steelers have a better chance of making the SB than a 12-4 Ravens team. Sad for you, but true.
Steelcitygurl1 3 weeks ago
@Steelcitygurl1 I wouldn't get too comfy with that, lets take a look back at the Steelers after their last SB win and how they really haven't been better than the Ravens. If a 9-7 Steelers had a better shot then we should've seen that happen already, but it didn't. And BTW your 6 SB rings don't mean anything in 2012 because 4 of them came well before the Ravens existed and each ring only says how good the Steelers were that year.
micfranklin 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Steelcitygurl1 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@micfranklin LMAO!, So you're saying that the Steelers superbowl winnings back in the 70s don't mean a damn thing now, because The Ravens never existed then? Yeah, Your right, What was I thinking. I mean you were only the Cleveland Browns then until you moved to that rat hole city known as Baltimore. So basically the "Ravens" were around then they were just too busy playing in Cleveland. And yet, even in that time zone, They still couldn't stop the Steelers from winning 4 SBs! lol
Steelcitygurl1 2 weeks ago
@Steelcitygurl1 Let me rephrase that: 6 rings is nice but winning 4 of them a long time ago doesn't mean your team is the shit now, it only shows how good they at that point in history. If I may compare, look at the Cowboys: they have 5 rings because they were extremely good the years they won them, but 5 rings doesn't mean they're good now seeing as how they haven't been going to the playoffs the last few years.
micfranklin 2 weeks ago
@micfranklin Just because the steelers had a few down fall seasons doesn't mean they are anywhere near to what the cowboys of today look like. They are at this point far from it. It's obvious that you're either not comprehending to what I'm saying or you just don't care how it's said. I never said, The steelers of today look anything like the Steelers of the 70s. No team of today look anything like those teams anymore. Times changed, Rules and rules and more rules changed!!
Steelcitygurl1 2 weeks ago
@micfranklin The Steelers of today are that good when they want to be, but not anywhere great than the ones of the 70s. The years where football was actually played like football, and not like touch football! If anything, The Steelers are still writing they're success story as of today with a few glitches, whereas the Cowboys are writing about the drought they've been going through since the late 90s. Who knows maybe they'll write about winning the Superbowl next year. u never know!
Steelcitygurl1 2 weeks ago
@micfranklin 6 rings is better than nice with a team who still have ounces of opportunities to make the Superbowl as often as they want. And there's really no point in arguing about whether or not this team of today can claim six, because either way We still have it. I mean you're talking about a team that was on the verge of claiming 7. This team would have claimed 3, Organization 7. All together 7. What differences does it make. We as fans say we claim 6 not the team.
Steelcitygurl1 2 weeks ago
@micfranklin 6 rings is better than nice with a team who still have ounces of opportunities to make the Superbowl as often as they want. And there's really no point in arguing about whether or not this team of today can claim six, because either way We still have it. I mean you're talking about a team that was on the verge of claiming 7. This team would have claimed 3, Organization 7. All together 7. What differences does it make. We as fans say we claim 6 not the team.
Steelcitygurl1 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@micfranklin @micfranklin 6 rings is better than nice with a team who still have ounces of opportunities to make the Superbowl as often as they want. And there's really no point in arguing about whether or not this team of today can claim six, because either way We still have it. I mean you're talking about a team that was on the verge of claiming 7. This team would have claimed 3, Organization 7. All together 7. What differences does it make. We as fans say we claim 6 not the team.
Steelcitygurl1 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@micfranklin 6 rings is better than nice with a team who still have ounces of opportunities to make the Superbowl as often as they want. And there's really no point in arguing about whether or not this team of today can claim six, because either way We still have it. I mean you're talking about a team that was on the verge of claiming 7. This team would have claimed 3, Organization 7. All together 7. What differences does it make. We as fans say we claim 6 not the team.
Steelcitygurl1 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Steelcitygurl1 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Steelcitygurl1 2 weeks ago
Ironic how the line "come meet me in the bathroom stall" was the same time Ben was getting sacked?
valliant98 4 weeks ago
Steelers fans talking trash... steelers lost to the broncos, who lost to the pats 45-10, who we really did beat besides a graceful choke by cundiff.
valliant98 4 weeks ago
@valliant98baltimore did put up a real good game against new england ravens in the super bowl if that td pass was held onto for a second later...im from new england and ill admit we got a lil lucky but that was a nice defensive play on our part
TheDjberry93 3 weeks ago
awesome
TWphoenix24 4 weeks ago
He Got That Lucky asz Hit Off But Mha Chargers Still Wonn #CHARGERRSSS !!!
Aeroswaqq252 1 month ago
"come meet me in the bathroom stall and its the rapist getting sacked lmao
TheJoeygxb 1 month ago 2
Dude, if I was Tom Brady I would be pissing my pants right now.
if I had sizzle, Ray, Ngata, even Jarret Johnson and everybidy else coming at me, I;d be scared.
Plus if he gets the pass off he has to worry about Ed Reed and now Lardarius is a ball hawk too.
the whole D, even the not as known guys are sick. I think they can own the Pats. They did it two years ago.
heatbucspies55 1 month ago
Comment removed
Steelcitygurl1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@heatbucspies55 I know Billy Cundiff pissed his pants when he went wayy left!! LMAO
Steelcitygurl1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yea that's what all rats fans are going to do when Ed Reed takes his no tackling ass off the field this season without a ring (Ball so Hard) along with THUGS and Rice...Old man Ray Ray you know the guy with a knife in his sock has one but that's where it ends.
SteelGripX6 1 month ago
@SteelGripX6
LOL! YOU LOST TO THE BRONCOS! STFU AND SIT THE FUCK DOWN, STOOLER!
bmoreravensoffline2 1 month ago 2
@bmoreravensoffline2 Ball So Hard Bitch...Cant win the big ones.
SteelGripX6 1 month ago
@SteelGripX6 wait, where were the steelers? at home? watching him play?
valliant98 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
SteelGripX6 1 month ago
Helllllllls yes! Great job with the video. BSHU!
sp22m3 1 month ago 2
Hot video...You should have added the monday night clip..STILL.... loving this.
Format1nr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GOOO Ravens!! BALL SO HARD!! Get the original BSHU shirts and hoodies only at tonytshirt . com
uzupus 2 months ago
I Love Suggs!!
obdurate6 2 months ago in playlist Liked videos