What tHe BLeeP Do wE (k)now? Part 3 "Double-Slit Experiment"

[DamagedWalrus]

Whaaaat? An interference pattern!??!

[foreverfuture23]

Up rd ttjUuuuuj jfgjuhyg gjg hutt uT okkkk oy omit ooooo

[ElectricIndica420]

it seems that we are god I guess :/

[winkte11]

we r 1 :) thx 4 ths

[hughjoey]

First of all this video is extrapolating waaaay beyond the data. This experiment DOES NOT suggest the idea that the conscious observer changes the result. Its the fact that the particle is being interacted with by an observing device. You can believe what you like, everyone is entitled to an opinion. However remember this; the idea that the earth is on the backs of turtles and is the center of the universe is also an opinion. If you have questions as to why this vid is FALSE feel free 2 msg

[squareatheist]

@hughjoey "This experiment DOES NOT suggest the idea that the conscious observer changes the result."

It does seem that a conscious observer or a physical record of what happened does change the result. The measuring device does not change the result for two reasons. 1. If you put a measuring device by one slit a particle going through the other slit would not be affected by the measuring device.

[squareatheist]

@hughjoey 2. You will get a wave pattern if you leave the measuring device active but avoid recording the result to a tape. This means the the record of what happened affects the outcome not the measuring device at the slit. This is discussed on the Youtube video "Explained ! The Double Slit Experiment " by Mindrush.

So, Do I understand this correctly or is there something I'm missing? I'd like to see what you think.

[droidhunter]

Mind over matter.

[ThomasEbele]

Perhaps that is where all the hidden mass in the universe is, all these simultaneous possibilities which we cannot see but we can measure, in a way.

[hankaaron1961]

If you really want to know what's happening in the double slit experiment, just google "statistical interpretation of Quantum Physics".

[tpill1111]

Damn.......:)

[ZombieZephyr]

Wow. Mass Effect 2 described the entanglement principle as a way you communicate with your boss. o,o I didn't think it was concrete, just some sci-fi game element. No idea it was a legitimate theory. (As far as theories go in legitimacy.)

[Kaastn]

How far down the rabbit hole do you wanna go? Did you even find it yet?

Aconselho muito a quem faz a tal pergunta que é : "O que é que estou cá a fazer???" .

Tudo de bem para todos :)

Muito amor...

[bakinglife]

does this mean that when I am not looking at my penis, it possibly becomes 2x larger and longer?

[HOOKSnKISSES]

@bakinglife ...NO, it actually means that your penis only exists the moment you look at it, touch it or feel it. The rest of the time you can only assume you have a penis... but you don't actually have one, lol!

[bakinglife]

@HOOKSnKISSES OMG so that is why it gets bigger when I touch it!

[TheGuzber]

@HOOKSnKISSES Thats not true even if funny :) little later in the "What the bleep do we (k)now" movie they explain that not only humans or other "living beings" are acting as the measuring things. Air is doing also. So your Penis ( or in the movie it was the moon ) also do exist if nobody is watching.

[HOOKSnKISSES]

@TheGuzber First off all: my comment was only intended to be funny, nothing more and I'm glad you got that. Secondly: I bought this DVD because the synopsis on the back cover made want to see the movie. Finding out that it only features pseudo scientists, using some vague quantum physics theories as a means to further their own scientology believes was a HUGE turn off. Of course, It's up to you to make up your own mind about this movie's validity but it sure as bleep didn't convince me!

[Asdam12]

@bakinglife No, it means when you don't look at it, it suddenly has no size whatsoever. :P

[boazandjiacinth]

that is one the coolest things i have ever seen, heard and i suppose learnt!!

[ebbandflow4614]

@boazandjiacinth If you think "learnt" is a word, you have much more to "learnt".

[KTK401]

@ebbandflow4614 Learnt is not a word?

[exponentialnegative1]

Here's what I see as both sides of the argument:

Why it might be wrong: You need photons to take a picture. The photons interact with electrons. The problem is that photons and basketballs react differently than photons and electrons.

Why you still have super powers:

You control things with your mind ALL THE TIME! Its called using your body and understanding chain reactions.. You can be Neo, you can be Buddha.

Its all how you look at it.

[daenumen]

1.) why is there no single slit pattern? 2.) what is the method of electron observation? 3.) why is a particle in a mixed state typically observed to be in one state repeatedly?

[nfexp]

were they 100% sure that they fired ONE electron at the time? And if so, are we 100% sure that there is nothing else there?...like "aether"?...sorry for my blasphemy, i meant "dark matter" ! :-)

[ChalleFoV3]

gives me a boner

[animcl]

links to papers on the subject?

[888eman]

I hate it when pseudo-scientists (ie not real scientists) twist real scientific data to try and "prove" their delusional ideals. This is an intriguing experiment, but it proves nothing of what this silly movie is all about: faith masquerading as science.

[MauricePedro]

It seems as if we are Flatlanders trying to comprehend the nature of the fourth dimension.

[fallbread]

so cool the future looks brighter all the time

[dimester74]

This is proof that the using "the Secret" really does work!

[yahoobiscuit]

how did they conclude that half a partical across the universe will instantly change when the other half is effected?

[manuellarrazabal]

hedron collider experiments and shit like htat

[VaderPX4Storm]

hmmm..

[MorrisIrvine]

"my superhuman intellect has revealed that time is retrospectively just a man made illusion designed to keep us in order like drones. Past. Present. Future. Its all one and Im master of all three."

If you thought that quote was deep then check out my films on my channel. your reality will never be the same again

[jon0714]

are you quoting yourself??? b/c if you are... that's pathetic

[MorrisIrvine]

id like to hear you say that after youv actualy watched my films. then well see whos pathetic

[sragey1]

there's no spoon

[1krook3]

no leas lo q sigue porq a mi ya me jugaron sta, losiento pro s d corazon no lo leas,

el 13 de octubre de 1991 un niño lamado nick se tiro de un puente devido a problemas familiares

si ya leiste esto deves copiar y pegar

en otros 5 videos mas o si no

nick vendra por toda tu familia

si lla los as leido copia y pega esto en 5 videos mas o tu madre morirá en 3 dias

[kennycoll]

I love this video! Amazing!! It's life Jim but not as we know it, not as we know it lol

[zackthegreat1]

o man i gotta present all this in a 15 minute lesson for chemistry...

why did i pick quantum physics?

[themag221]

HAHAHAHAHAHHA fucking good qestion... so did you make it or you just did went to class. ?

[zackthegreat1]

i made it...

i did it yesterday...

and it went pretty well...

i used the first half of the video w/ the cartoon part to eat up the first 5 mins...

thank god lol...

[themag221]

bravo :P, what grade are you in or so ?

[zackthegreat1]

sophomore in high school

[herzmeister]

That also goes for Quantum Entanglement with the Matrix Virtual Reality. The entangled particles are just references to the same object in the machine's memory. That's why when properties of that object change, it doesn't matter that they are light years apart, space and time don't matter as they are merely constructs of the virtual reality.

[herzmeister]

Guess we do live in the Matrix Virtual Reality after all. When no one watches, the basketball is just an (abstract) object in the machine's memory. Once someone is watching, the virtual scene is being rendered.

[aiklarung]

Maybe God was too lazy to instantiate every atom and just referenced the same object all over =P

But then one celestial programmer caused DLL Hell and the DotBible framework had to be released.

[fartgooselimmo]

hey look up the flying spaghetti monster

[velanstiz]

@aiklarung

Nice one!

[JunglyGirl]

It's shocking, I completely understand this. It was a different story when I was sober.

[moofdebowl]

one thing is everything, everything is one

[wallygrl8]

holy shit cakes so that means... i am connected to david tennant and john barrowman! were touching!.. kinda

[daviddrums88]

We are all One

[Niccocci]

We are all None

[doston1]

So I guess the next step would be to discover whether the observer can affect the way the particle/wave behaves. If so, that'd put a whole new paint job on things...

[LightEssence37]

Are you meaning to "control or change" the behavior of the particle/wave? The video shows that the observer does indeed change the experiment by the act of observation. What I think would be amazing is to break that barrier so that the observer could directly affect the particle/wave with conscious intent, and get to a point where the particle/wave could function in either mode with or without observance. I recommend watching the part of this series "messages from water"

[exponentialnegative1]

Here's what I see as both sides of the argument:

Why it might be wrong: You need photons to take a picture. The photons interact with electrons. The problem is that photons and basketballs react differently than photons and electrons.

Why you still have super powers:

You control things with your mind ALL THE TIME! Its called using your body and understanding chain reactions.. You can be Neo, you can be Buddha.

Its all how you look at it.

[Bluesrains]

Excellant!!!