@alejandroalexsosa wow i think you need to watch this again and also sense you see youtube videos as a credible source should also watch the other related videos and this one talks of the whites prejudice which blinded them to the FACT! that blacks had there own great civilizations and kingdoms one of which (amoung many) was the egyptions and even in europe were the moors (blacks) came and civilized europe during the middle ages
@alejandroalexsosa wow again you prove my point for me so you acknowledge that there is insentive for whites to distort our (mine and yours) colored history or more specificly black history we didnt influence everything (atleast in more modern times) but most things yes sense we started this whole notion of civilization which obviously didnt reach you also you didnt acknowledge what the olmecs looked like tell me what were there features just to be clear
@chokoboy5578 In what way did I prove your point, what point were you trying to make? If your point is that you are inferior then yes I proved it, but if that was not your point you need to read over the comments I posted on a 'white' invention in order for your naturally primitive brain to comprehend this language, which is also a 'white' language. You are an excellent troll.
@alejandroalexsosa have to reduce yourself futher with insults and what you say (though not true) is all fine and dandy but ill ask again what did the olmecs look like?
@alejandroalexsosa wow your last to comments proved my point better than any words i could ever say the video called the primitive negro MYTH! talks about how blacks being primitive was just a falsehood made up by whites for whites to justify there domination of blacks this is why me showing you evidence is useless cause just like with the video any evidence that doesnt support your centiment is either false or you blatently distort the obvious to support what you say funny
@chokoboy5578 i will also simplify it for your one dimensional American nigger mind, what a combination. Every culture/ethnicity/race that migrated or fleed war torn and corrupt countries to developed countries like Australia and the US, began in poverty like the nigger. The Jewish for example, have undergone greater hardships than any nigger. Italians, Greeks, Spanish - dont be fooled by your Mexicans - we had the brainpower to work our asses off together and become successful.
@alejandroalexsosa well you can believe your white or just mixed with white and native american which themselves have distant black roots if you want to look up the olmecs that is one example and no matter how you distort things that are facts like the origin of man there is an incentive for whites to distort and hide our history so that they can dominat us as a race cause thats one of the best ways to do so
@alejandroalexsosa also you keep calling me a nigger and for me that is fine but i will not stoop to your primitive level i am civilized enough to disregard that and not use slurs that are used by a man with no evidence or argument and saying nigger will not lighten your skin or whiten you up anyway i dont need slurs i have facts, historical evidence, and scientific evidence
@chokoboy5578 So what your saying is, because I call you a nigger you disregard the actual facts; historical and scientific evidence, that I have presented? I think you have because I said the Jewish underwent more hardship than any nigger, and are one of the most powerful ethnic groups in the world because they had the brain power to organise themselves, something HISTORY has shown YOU struggle to do - Compton, Queens, Baton Rouge, Baltimore - the entire continent of Africa?
@alejandroalexsosa oh you do realize that jews were kicked out of nearly every country in europe just cause they were jews even in the 20th century for example in germany (and every country they concerd) during the nazi regime, italy during the mussolini regime, and russia during the stalin regime along with others so jews didnt unit with anyone but themselves which i think made them stronger though they dont dominate like the white man in the modern era
@chokoboy5578 Jews do dominate 'like the white man' because if you were more well versed in this subject, you would know they ARE 'white'. East Asia has made its move into Africa now because of the resources they can capitalise from, but I don't see any of you pointing fingers at the chinks for your problems? Think about it from your 'scientific' view, regardless of the morality, the reasons the slavery existed and the capitalist regimes continue today was due to natural selection.
@alejandroalexsosa i know black people always say its because of white people that were in the situation were in now and thats true in many ways though its not the only reason its not just the slave trade aspect cause slavery was common in many civilizations it was the type of slavery which was revolutionary you can look up the willie lynch letters for elaboration also in the modern era the europian "scramble for africa" caused much damage to the black race to this very day
@chokoboy5578 You were inferior or less advanced and still are to this day-you can pretend you are righteous due to our immorality in natural selection, but if I was a nigger I would not sit here making outrageous claims that the entire world distorted facts that my ancestors were 'great' when really they were dominated by every civilisation. I would acknowledge the achievements of the Asians and the Europeans such as schooling, and use them to rise above my genes expectations.
@alejandroalexsosa your not really presenting facts just saying were primitive but how about this if your willing to civilize yourself long enough and do research i will present you with things to look up that will support "false claims" as you call it i doubt it will get through sense you seem unable to factor in any intellect when it comes to your beliefs like a religious person but if you can temporaily ill show you evidence to see for yourself can you do that?
@chokoboy5578 ahahaha fuck that was the funniest shit i have ever read. I refuted every ridiculous claim you made and your only response compares me to an ignorant follower of religion whilst talking down to me (haha the irony) AND saying that I presented no facts? Have a read of every comment I posted and reflect. You can 'present' your research just make sure they are peer reviewed sources or in other words, credible and I will happily 'civilise' myself to your nigger standard.
@alejandroalexsosa fine ill give you several resources though i doubt it will matter cause even though your colored you have the condecending additude of a white man and even believe your white and i wonder what is a credible source to you let me guess a white man that supports your false claim but like i said ill bring sources one good one is the video which we currently place our comments but il bring more and take on the job of attempting to civilize a savage (you)
@chokoboy5578 By the way I just researched the Olmecs you mentioned before. I read about the entire culture of the Olmecs, who are now extinct - so already your claim is useless, in Prehistoric Mesoamerica. They had the first linguistic writing in the Western hemisphere-credited with inventing the zero and the Mayan calendar. One speculation of their origin was that they were of African ancestry :/ but is not considered credible by vast majority of Mesoamerican researchers.
@alejandroalexsosa fuck what the meso american resaerchers say cause they (like you) are willing to go far length to discredit black greatness but did you look at the heads which probably portray the noblemen or leaders with there full lips and wide noses and other black features which could have only come from black ancestry but let me guess what you'll say thats not evidence enough they may look black but arent theres a reason why they look black oh please
@alejandroalexsosa finally to wrap up my point like the tactics of kings who gained the crown through a kodeta they tell the previous prince if young enough (if they let him live) that hes not royalty hes nothing and will always be nothing cause hes not of royal blood and its the same with black were told through history that we were never great and were just slaves and thats all we can be and people bellieve this cause whites disstorted the facts that we were great
@alejandroalexsosa also i can tell you are spanish by your name if it matchs who you really are (correct me if im wrong) and that makes me sad cause you and a whole lot of other hispanics have become gulibal and have fallen for the white mans tricks same as many of my people you hispanics have no selfasteam and think your white cause you hate being colored and you are colored which is why it doesnt matter to me if you call me a nigger
@chokoboy5578 There are more Hispanics than the Mexicans in the US you one dimensional nigger. Hispanics-and by that I mean White Hispanics, Castizos and Mestizos (NOT mullatos who are really just black) have achieved more than any nigger and in the case of financial wealth, have achieved more than the 'white oppressor' - the richest man in the world is Mexican. We have more people in political power, richer businessmen, our women are arguably the most beautiful in the world etc.
@alejandroalexsosa well ok my spelling is off big deal but the fact of the matter is all humans have 1 ancestor in common which they call scientific eve (mind thats a fact) she is a black african that in africa (after the nomadic period) settled and got there civilization together then took it on the road so if those people that migrated from africa were black how can the people who settled in eurasia not atleast in the begining be black
@chokoboy5578 That is what they say, but if you want throw around theories I can throw around the multiregional origin of modern humans which suggested all originated in different areas around the world except Africa, evolving from and interbreeding with the Neanderthal man. So all that leaves us with, is the evolution of man and his achievements - the most significant of which lie in the Mediterranean, Eastern Europe and East Asia.
a survey of mainstream of archaeology and anthropology research
What did you find out, about the Tarim mummies. 2000 or 1,200BC. The civilization in Egypt Badarian Culture 5,000 to 4,000 BC . Do you understand, by the 4th dynasty the great pyrimads were built.
Cont.. hopelessly incapable of acquiring the knowledge requisite to progress. It was southern colored peoples everywhere, in China, in Central America, in India, Mesopotamia, Syria, Egypt and Crete who gave the northern white peoples civilization
Bishop William Montgomery Brown: "For the first two or three thousand years of civilization, there was not a civilized white man on the earth. Civilization was founded and developed by the swarthy races of Mesopotamia, Syria and Egypt, and the white race remained so barbaric that in those days an Egyptian or a Babylonian priest would have said that the riffraff of white tribes a few hundred miles to the north of their civilization were
@noobkingramsley I don't think anyone thinks you are stupid but going all over the world trying to stick the black Label on culture we know were not African does not help your cause any does it?
Fact: Literacy of any kind didn't come to the English people until the Romans invaded in 41 AD. They had no writing system nor architectures and they weren't on the verge of creating any. The Romans literately had to teach those cave men how to wear cloths and write their own names. After the dark ages, the Moors had to re-civilize them because most were illiterate.
black people never invented anything? This video was just recently uploaded, the invention said to be "good chance of being the best thing on Earth" - Paul Werbos. A battery that uses heat as energy and if put in a car, the car would go 1,000 miles instead of 300 or less on a full tank of gas. Check this out.
watch?v=el5AZRyOA6Y&feature=related
Gee I wonder why this isn't being talked about much through the media? This is a big change, maybe because a black man invented it.
Some harsh words from those explorers about the savage nature of Africans. It's funny how we are uncivilized yet they invaded our continent and stole our culture and corrupted it and now selling it to people as real history. Africans are still going through the natural process of evolution which makes us more in tuned with the world than anyone else. We will rise to God status and endure all that you will throw at us. Real history is written in stone and embedded in our DNA.
Humans migrated from Africa about 100,000 BC as fully human people. Advanced culture also migrated from Africa about 60,000 to 50,000 BC One group migrated to various parts of Africa, particularly the Sahara and West Africa. Another group migrated to Southern Europe and the Middle East (Grimaldi Negroids), another went to India. More migrated to East Asia’s southern regions and to Australia and Melanesia
You need to do some research in the area. I researched Egypt Culture for several months. I studied all ethnic groups , timelines and cultures I researched the Berbers the Indigenous peoples of North African. That was a Lie. Came from Germany . But Civilization did come up from the Upper to the Lower. Also, research the unification of Egypt. It is more pyrimads in Sudan than Egypt . They are the same people( Nubians), they did not share political views
The conclusion will be they are all Black African Negro Cutlures. Then again Africans came into Middle East and settled. They came as immigrant groups like the Kushites, the Egyptians, the Punitians/Phoenicians (People of Punt). They blended together and became the later Black Israelites, the Black Syrians and Canaanites They established themselves in the land and built many amazing cultures and civilizations.
The main part of my comment was the Natufian Culture:, Your comment: agriculture as we all know came to Africa from the middle east who domesticated wheat roughly 12,000 years ago They were African Negroes
Halfan culture, Qadan and Sebilian cultures,Mushabian culture,Harifian culture, ,Faiyum A culture,Merimde culture,El Omari culture,Maadi culture,Tasian culture Badarian culture,Naqada culture ,Amratian culture (Naqada I),Gerzean culture (Naqada II) and Protodynastic Period (Naqada III) Research these Cutlures; The concludes will be from BlAfriacn Negroes Origins
You need to read ,about the Natufian Culture. The Arabs invaded Northern Africa in 700AD. the Berbers or Barbar arrivied in the 400AD from Germany, and Summerinas: what is that word again Africoid. Skeletons of the Mediterranean type have been found throughout Middle Africa, Southwest Asia, Mesopotamia, Indo-Pakistan, Central Asia and China. It is no secret that the founders of ancient Egypt, Elam, Sumer and the Indus Valley were all of the Mediterranean type.
@TheBowie83 WOW! I cant make head nor tail of your last comment LOl! I suppose I had better start with your definitions again. The term Africaoid is a complete nonsense because there are three completely different phenotypes in Africa and cannot be grouped together. That would be like saying Europoid LOL. To be honest with you I know you have tried to research this stuff thoroughly but it doesn't make any sense does it? Look in order to understand the Mediterranean cultures (cont)
@TheBowie83 (cont) whether it be Egypt, The Minoans, The Etruscan's, the Phoenicians, whoever you must look back to the first instance of agriculture anywhere in the world which is Southeast Europe and the Middle east about 12,000 ya, and the relationship agriculture had to these civilizations! It was the Natufians that spread the domesticated wheat grass to the Fertile Crescent in Southern Iraq who in turn used it to create a continuous farming culture about 10,000 years ago (cont)
@TheBowie83 (cont) which would later become the first civilization on earth SUMERIA. Now forget Western Europe, forget North Africa because there was nothing there this early. Sure there were the ancestors of the Celts in Britain and France and the Germanics but nothing coming close to civilization similarly the only thing in Saharan Africa so early was the Kerma culture in southern Sudan but again no where near civilization level. Now we know that the first culture North of the Saharha (cont)
@TheBowie83 (cont) id the Libu (Libya) because we have found mummies 5000 years old suggesting a culture from at least 5,500 but we do not know which direction they came from whether they were settlers from Crete or from Mesopotamia in the East but the point is there was civilization on either side of Egypt long before it began there. So my question to you is why do you think a civilization arose independently in Egypt from the Kerma culture in the south when there was already (cont)
@TheBowie83 (cont) much older civilizations on either side of it??? If you look at ancient history from all over the Mediterranean and not just Egypt you will find it is not impossible but extremely unlikely that civilization came up the Nile from the South.
Great Lies has been told. Those lies were told for generations. Your Great, great Grandfather, great grandfather, grand Father, father, mother, and Governent, believed in those lies to be the truth. But they were only lies. Once the truth comes out people like you, become furious and frustrated. You still want to believe in those lies and die for them. But they were only LIES
archaeological and historical evidence all indicate that Europe was not the homeland of the White race. It would appear from the evidence that the ancient Greeks were Blacks. Moreover, it is clear that these blacks taught the Europeans civilization and government and that these symbols of government and civilization can not be claimed solely as the property of Europeans
Once you know the ancient people of Egypt were Africoid, it destroys the philosophical and regilious beliefs of the Arabs.(Islam) Greek(B),, European(B) Christianity.Persians, and Jewish Research the Badarian Culture first Civilization in Upper Egypt
The Badarian culture provides the earliest direct evidence of agriculture in Upper Egypt during the Predynastic Era. It flourished between 4400 and 4000 BCE,[2] and might have already existed as far back as 5000 BC
@TheBowie83 But the point is my friend, agriculture as we all know came to Africa from the middle east who domesticated wheat roughly 12,000 years ago You are not telling me that the Arabs brought agriculture with them but nothing else? Google "Gobekli Tepe" and look at the level of sophistication required to erect the structure! Now this is about 8,000 years before the pyramids, the idea of Egypt being isolated from the older civilizations like Sumeria for 8,000 years is impossible to believe!
f Upper Egypt and Nubia had the greatest biological affinity to people of the Sahara and more southerly areas.
Research : The Badarian, Natufian and Naqada Cultures. The Ancient people of Thebes were Black Africans. During the 25 dynasty, the Nubians were in control of Egypt again. The Ancient Kemet the ancient name of Egypt or Ethiopia. The where the Ancient peoples of Chem and Egypt
Research:Peopling of the Nile Valley - a knol by Mainstream Academic Research
There is now a sufficient body of evidence from modern studies of skeletal remains to indicate that the ancient Egyptians, especially southern Egyptians, exhibited physical characteristics that are within the range of variation for ancient and modern indigenous peoples of the Sahara and tropical Africa. In general, the inhabitants of Upper Egypt and Nubia had the greatest biological affinity to people of the
@TheBowie83 I think where you theory seems to be tripping itself up is in your definitions you say "black" then you say "negroes" Please before we go any further define the words "black" and "negroe"
The scheme of weakening the Blacks by turning their half-white brothers against them cannot be over emphasized…these Black mothers remained slaves while their Mulatto sons and daughters were born free and classified as white.” However, some Blacks colluded with the Asians and freely gave up their daughters as gifts, destined to become concubines, appeasing the invaders while African villages were raided for women to be exported to Asia
@TheBowie83 Well I dont know what you are talking about now but you seem to think that anyone from north Africa who is not Negroid is mixed and I am sorry to have to tell you that this is nonsense! And you keep using the word "black" to describe the first Egyptians! The word "black" is completely meaningless, it does not tell you if they were Negroid or North African does it????? The simple fact is the first humans in the Saharan Region would definitely not have been Negroids from the South.
The first modern Egyptians were half African, half-Asian who were largely hostile to their Black mothers. This attitude stemmed from an opportunistic desire to identify with and become part of the new power elite of the conquerors. Egypt became all white. The mulattoes were classified as white in Egypt, all North Africa and the Middle East-a fact that still confuses Blacks in America where the very opposite policy was adopted
In the beginning,Egypt was all black, this pattern remain unbroken over generations and still in the end become near white in color with not a black face in the royal lineage. The invading conquerors not only capture and control all political and economic power bu military might, but, even though they might be nomandic barbarains, they generally claim to be from a higher civilization and therefore, reinforce the nyth of being superior in fact, and not jut because of military conquest
You do not know, but The Bowies does. they did not vanish
The Palermo Stone records victory after victory over the Asians. Great triumph came when Afrcian king Mens defeated the Asians decisively and united all Egypt under African rule again, beginning the historic First Dynasty. There was no Egypt before the black king from whose name it was indirectly derive. The country was called Chem or Chemi, inhabitants by blacks, not the color of the soil For generations Memphis
@TheBowie83 We do not know who they were we only know by DNA of their descendants and we do not find a single group from north Africa with Sub-Saharan markers! There is of course a small chance that a band of roaming Negroids settled there and then built the Egyptian civilization and then vanished completely from the region leaving no descendants but its all pure conjecture. There is a massive genetic difference between Saharan and Sub-Saharan Africans my friend.
Thebes was the most important single city in the entire history of the black people. The history of Black Africa might well begin at Thebes. For this was truly the "Eternal City of the Blacks" that presented the most compelling evidence that they were the builders of the earliest civilization in Chem, later called Egypt, as well as the great civilization in the South
The people of Chem-Thebes (Ancient Egypt) were pure Negroes. Modern Egyptians were African and Asians (Afro-Asians)
Among the criteria accepted in physical anthropology for classifying races, the osteological measurements are perhaps the least misleading (in contrast to craniometry) for distinguishing a black man from a white man. By this criterion, also, the Egyptians belong among the black races. This study was made by the distinguished German savant Lepsius at the end of the nineteenth century and his conclusions remain valid
@TheBowie83 I know all about those cultures so what? Are you suggesting that they were Negroids? If so where is your evidence? We don't even know where the Egyptians of 3000 years ago came from never mind 7000! You see this is the problem with you Americans.. Intelligence Quotient or lack of! All your theories and assertions are nothing more than pure conjecture and even worse you have an idea of Negroid Egypt in your heads and are trying to manufacture evidence to fit your delusion. Sad.
@greeny202a Yes, the the Ancient Egytians were pure Black African. No, you do not know,the cultures. Skeletons of the Mediterranean type have been found throughout Middle Africa, Southwest Asia, Mesopotamia, Indo-Pakistan, Central Asia and China. It is no secret that the founders of ancient Egypt, Elam, Sumer and the Indus Valley were all of the Mediterranean type. These Mediterranean people called themselves: KUSHITES
@TheBowie83 Pay no attention to the pro white ranting lunatic. Here's a ugly fact. Literacy of any kind didn't come to the English people until Romans invaded in 41 AD. They had no writing system nor architectures and weren't on the verge of creating any. The Romans literately had to teach those angry, stupid cave men how to write their own names. That's why the Romans called them "Brittunculi" (little Britains) because they were backwards, war mad children. Many of them haven't changed.
@nightmarehammer Actually the Romans did not call it Britain at all it was called "Great Britain" much later on meaning the bigger of the two Britains Great Britain and lesser Britain which is still today called Brittany in Northern France. And as for architecture I would look for Stonehenge, Newgrange, Hothgar, Castlrigg etc all of which predate the Egyptian pyramids. In short shut the fuck up you jealous black twat!
@TheBowie83 Look you racist Afrocentric buffoon! If Egypt 5000 years ago did not have any Europeans or Arabs it would have been the only fucking country bordering the Mediterranean that did so!!! Sure there MUST have been some Nubians up there too but Europeans and Arabs have been populating every country around the Mediterranean since we invented boats at 12,000 years ago at the end of the last Ice age!
That is: they're the oldest people, being most closely related to the first anatomically modern human populations, and (being genetically ancient, still living in the place where they've always lived, climatically stable since the late Pleistocene, still surviving by hunting and gathering even today) most likely to resemble the founder population of all non-Africans.
I'm afraid to report,greeny202a, your ancestors were, indeed, black
That is: they're the oldest people, being most closely related to the first anatomically modern human populations, and (being genetically ancient, still living in the place where they've always lived, climatically stable since the late Pleistocene, still surviving by hunting and gathering even today) most likely to resemble the founder population of all non-Africans.
I'm afraid to report,greeny202a, your ancestors were, indeed, black
Name calling again Black Africian haplogroup is a better term.Homo sapiens sapiens evolved 200,000 years ago on the Atlantic seaboard of southwestern Africa in what is today the border between Angola and Namibia.
This is, of course, the ancestral heartland of San hunter-gatherers, sometimes known as 'Bushman' people. This is pleasing both to archeologists and geneticists since their MtDNA tells us that San people are at the end of the deepest branch of all human populations
@TheBowie83 Really is that so.... And what of the Asians??? Were they developed from Black short arse slanty eyeism?????? You are just a black racist dick head!
I can careless, about your personal feelings,. The facts only. Telling the truth. Research: White" haplogroups; like R1 and R2, are instead, indisputably "Black" haplogroups. As always; all roads lead "Back" to the Black man. Modern
White European Y-DNA which clearly shows that there is NO uniquely "White" haplogroups; but rather, all White DNA is derived from Black haplogroups.
@TheBowie83 There is no such thing as a "black haplogroup" you buffoon! Whether you are white, black, yellow, brown, red or fucking purple with green spots we all descend from a single group of North East African San who were neither Negroid nor white but somewhere in between! Have a look at some pictures of the san on here and you will see there is absolutely no scientific reason to believe they were any different 50,000 years ago.
I disagree with this.They didn't like us from day one!
It had nothing to do with slavery or colonization.Parts of Asia and all Americas were colonized too...I don't recall anyone denying those people their history despite that.
The irrational and disgusting hatred against Black People started long before slavery even existed!!!
@TheBowie83 We are all people of colour! just some less colour than others. I do apologise for what my ancestors did to yours but the only thing this black power bullshit is going to give your people is a wooden box! And i am drunk sorry!!!!
@SundiataOfMali Go shrink your head! You people will still be blaming whites when the continent of Africa has died of starvation and famine! Sort yourself out and stop bleating on about being oppressed! Im sick of hearing this African bullshit!
@newfish09 Look mate are you serious? Yes they have been exploited fair enough but I am on these videos because there maybe African Americans on here looking for actual science and truth and they get presented with the Afrocentric unsubstantiated drivel written by TheBowie83 below. Every Anthropologist, Geneticist and Archeologist worth his money accepts that the birthplace of the modern human was central Ethiopia about 250,000 ya resulting in a most recent common ancestor 150,000 ya (cont)
@greeny202a "they get presented with the Afrocentric unsubstantiated" and with comments about they havent built past mud huts in 9000 years of recorded history.
@newfish09 I never said they have built nothing but mud huts. The West Africans have built various kingdoms like The Nok or the Ife or even Benin but they had as much to do with Ancient Egypt as a fucking Eskimo!
@newfish09 Oh I don't blame them at all! If they are not shown the truth they will believe what they see, I blame the stupid Afrocentrics who most of which know all too well Ancient Egyptians could not have been West African Negroids but still make up their bullshit anyway. Why do people like yourself who are obviously a little more intelligent make your own videos about the Library at Timbuktu and the great walls of Benin or the astronomers of the Dogon but leave Egypt to the North Africans!
@newfish09 (cont) I am all for West Africans having pride in their people especially post slavery but NOT AT THE EXPENSE OF SCIENTIFIC TRUTH AND HISTORY! And bare in mind not just African history but the history of all mankind too.
It may be said that Coon's major contributions to science were the fruitful ... or that all of his data should be thrown out because some of his theories were wrong. .... hermetically sealed races (Australoid, Capoid, Caucasoid, Congoid, Mongoloid
When I first researching the race of the Ancient Egyptians, I was puzzled. In my research, they label the Ancient people of Ethiopia as Caucasian . I had several friends from Ethiopia. I asked a lady from Ethiopia , if she was Caucasian . She laughed at me, stating. I am just like you.
Another white racist remark: A genetic study done by researchers from all over the world: China, Japan, U.S.A. U.K. and other countries, and published in 2001; definitively answered the question of Chinese origins. The findings were that the original Chinese were 100% pure Black African, with absolutely no outside admixture - But here again, we are talking about the original Black Chinese, modern Chinese are quite different
@TheBowie83 NO IT DOES NOT SHOW THAT AT ALL! It shows that the chinese are descended from the out of Africa migrators the same as we all are no one knows whether they were black or not! Stop trying to insert the word black all the time because it infers they were Negroid when we already know that Negroids had not yet evolved when humans left Africa. There are no races today we are all the same but modern day Negroids are a modern phenotype and did not exist 70,000 years ago. (cont)
@greeny202aThe Ainu are an ancient Black people, who were part of the second out of Africa (OOA) migration event that went to China (circa 50,000 B.C.). Another people who were a part of that event: the Jomon, immigrated to Japan at about 35,000 B.C, the Ainu followed at about 13,000 B.C. (By then, the Ainu might have been admixed to some degree - see below). Today, the Ainu have been admixed with modern Japanese (who arrived in Japan at about 350 B.C.), to the point of extinction
@TheBowie83 (cont) why can you Afrocentrics not understand that? One last time-The original African ancestor of all humans today were not the same black Africans that we see there today! Negroids, Capoids, Somalids, Berbers, Europeans Asians, Indians, Australasians and Native Amercans are all modern phenotypes and did not exist 50,000 years ago the only humans around then were the more generic San type that every human alive shares a common ancestor with! Stop it with the black brother bullshit!
Are you alright or does the truth hurts that much. Once again google: Khoisan and Africa Phenotypes. What did you find? Did you see the Negroes with the epicanthic eyes Yes/No. Please read and research :Khoisan (also spelled Khoesaan, Khoesan or ( DO YOU GET IT NOW) KHOE-SAN is a unifying name for two ethnic groups of Southern Africa, who share physical and putative linguistic characteristics distinct from the Bantu majority of the region. I was never wrong in my comments.
@TheBowie83 NO! there are no Negroids with the FULL EXTERIOR EPICANTHIC EYE FOLD because like Europeans you no longer carry the gene for it only the East African Capoids and the Asians still carry it. You my friend have an Afrocentrism problem you are trying to suggest that anyone from Africa with a big ole nose and big ole lips are negroid and I'm sorry but that is not the case. The Negroid phenotype is an adaptation to South West Africa from the much more ancient East African phenotype.
@TheBowie83 (cont) Yes it is true that some remote West African groups can still have the partial Epicanthic eye fold just as some Scandinavians in Europe still can but the Asian full eye fold is impossible. The definition of Negroid is the pronounced prognasthism and the amount of Dolichocephalicism! Quite frankly if you think there is no difference between a San, A Kenyan and someone from Nigeria you are either fooling yourself or working to an agenda.
You need to start reading books. Did you google: Khoisan and Africa Phenotypes. Did you see the Negroes with the epicanthic eyes. Google: Human Migration: Africa, Khoisan, (Khoi + San), Y haplogroup
The Celts and Germans who migrated into Europe from the place of their evolution, (the Eurasian Plains): exterminated the Khoisan inhabitants of Europe and seized their lands.
@TheBowie83 Wrong yet again!!! 15% of modern Europeans are descended from the San and the group of Asians that entered Europe were also descended from the first group of San so we are all the same. My friend you really have got this backwards. Seriously watch the whole series of "the incredible human journey" it goes from "out of Africa" to "Asia" to "Europe" to "Australia". I guarantee you will learn something.
@TheBowie83 Yes try a video on YouTube called "9 - Human Ancestry Made Easy" by Potholer54 (fantastic videos) and try "the incredible human journey" this one is from the BBC they are both independent and professional videos and unlike you have no Afrocentric bias. The first shows quite clearly that it is the San that is the original model. Negroids are a later adaptation to tropical West Africa.
@TheBowie83 NO! the Khoisan were not Negroid!!!!! The Negroids are descendants of the San just like the Asians or the Europeans! You are getting confused by using the word black because it is meaningless! They were only black because they lived close to the equator and Africans that still live there today still look like that but genetically are not the same. Watch the video "the incredible human journey" ep 1, 7:00 the original humans were neither negroid or European but in between.
Khoisan: The genetic structure of the indigenous hunter-gatherer peoples of southern Africa, the oldest known lineage of modern human, is important for understanding human diversity. Studies based on mitochondrial1 and small sets of nuclear markers2 have shown that these hunter-gatherers, known as Khoisan, San, or Bushmen, are genetically divergent from other humans. They are Negores. Do you understand
@TheBowie83 Are you serious?!!? I'm beginning to think you are trolling! (A) Negroids cannot produce the epicanthic eye fold that the Asians have only the Khoisan can do that so it is impossible for black negroid Africans to be the original model! Please forget your African superiority complex and watch "the incredible human journey" on YouTube and learn some REAL facts and history of your people and mine.
My comments are not base upon a superiority complex or hate. Just tell the truth. You have know ideal , about the Khoisan people. Do you.......... Once again name calling. Your comment: Negroids cannot produce the epicanthic eye fold that the Asians have only the Khoisan can do that so it is impossible for black negroid Africans to be the original model! My writing this statement we are in agreement. Google: Khosian, Please, inform me of your findings. Also, google: African phenotypes
Why are you associating my comments as hate. I am giving out incorrect information. I have made no racist comments. You are the one calling me out of my name. Research the Kurgan Culture
The ancient Whites of Europe, had no knowledge of history (they came as illiterate nomads), so they made it up as they went. They created "Myth" for everything that they didn't know or understand. But over time, as they did gain knowledge, the educated amoung them started to question their myths
@TheBowie83 Its a shame you have such hatred for whites because keep repeating your racist nonsense is only going to make future life for your people difficult with the whites.
Go to this web site:Meet the black Brazilian mother who has three white children Think first: A white male and female can not produce the phenotype of a Black African. A Black male and female can produce phenotypes of other races. Research:The Origins of The Alien Albino Mutant Caucasians
No - man is not going to change his skin color in 6-12,000 years - At least not by "EVOLUTION". But; man with a hereditary gene defect like color-blindness, Sickle-cell anemia, or Albinism: who is forced by Societal abuse and climatic difficulty: to "SEGREGATE" themselves and "INBREED", well that's a different thing entirely. They could create an entirely new subspecies of Humans - all with that particular gene defect - in a relatively short time. The average Human female
Further proof of White and Black Mongol admixture, is with the "Tarim mummies" which are a series of mummies (dating from 1,800 B.C.) discovered in the Tarim Basin in present-day Xinjiang, which is on the border with Central Asia, in northwest China. The oldest mummies are White people, but later, at about 1,100 B.C, they become "mixed-race. Research the Tarim Baisn mummies. Why do you label people, racist, idiot,and dumbass? Whose the dumbass now.
These Albinos continued on to Central Asia, where they settled. It seems logical to assume that over the many thousands of years that it took for these migrants to reach northern Asia, that there would have been some interbreeding between the Mongols and the Albinos; which probably allowed the Albinos to gain some fixed degree of pigmentation. Proof of this admixture, is in the fact that Whites and Mongols (Chinese), both share the same
@biotictec LOL hello again. Yes i am addicted to the Afrocentric sites now, with the greatest respect they just get crazier and crazier! Seriously I had an American guy on one of them trying to tell me that William Shakespeare was black because the name "will of the shaking spear" was a common warriors name in the kingdom of Benin! Another says that Europeans were actually police left here by reptilian aliens to subdue the black masses! Its better than TV....
@greeny202a You know what it the say way with these crazy Eurocentrists still talking the same old crap. One Crazy Eurocentric told me the Ancient Egyptians were Aliens from Mar. This is a crazy world we living in today!! Dam!!!!!!
@TheBowie83 The oldest DNA on earth is that of the Khoisan of Eastern Africa they are believed to be the direct descendants of the original human model about 250,000 years old. The next oldest is the blacks (West Africans) they split from the San about 120,000 years ago and then it is the North Africans. What is your point? Yes the bllacks are about 50,000 years older than Europeans but the San are at least 150,000 years older than the blacks! So what?
@TheBowie83 Im communicating that you are an idiot if you think white people are albinos. You crazy blacks are not doing anything to disprove your dumb negro stereotypes.
@greeny202a No, I am not a Idiot., No, Negro steritopes. No, racisem. Communiacted, about the truth. Research the Kurgan Culture and Cord Culture. If the oldest DNA is the Khoisan .Confirmation that the White (Caucasian) Race is derived from Albinos, is documented in the findings from genetic analysis of Y-DNA haplogroup "R".
@TheBowie83 If I were you I would research the medical condition called Albinism before making yourself look even more foolish and racist. I cannot understand why you think that attacking white people makes your position stronger? If you can go in the sun and get a tan then you CANNOT be Albino. African Americans are such dumb asses, well thats what you get for transporting only the physically fittest slaves over to the New World and breeding them together paying no attention to intelligence.
@greeny202a The second (OOA) migration event, saw Blacks from Africa with straight hair and "Mongol features" take an "Inland route" through southern Asia and on up to China, where they settled. Included with this group, were straight haired Blacks "without" Mongol features - now called "Dravidians" who stayed close to Africa, and settled in India and other areas of southern Asia. Also included with this second (OOA) group were Albinos, who were probably motivated by a quest
By a quest for relief from the heat and burning Sunshine of southern Africa - and relief from the torment heaped upon them by normal Africans. Even today, superstitious Blacks of southern Africa; maim and mutilate Albinos in the ignorant belief that their body parts process magical properties, which they use in rituals.
@TheBowie83 WRONG! (A) they were NOT blacks from Africa they were the San ancestors who were neither black nor white but half way between the two.(B) Please watch "the incredible human journey" on YouTube on episode 1 got straight to 7:00 and it will show you exactly who the first people to leave Africa were and I can assure you they were not black Negroids.
@greeny202a wow ive read your comments and it seems to me that you are mad that your a nigger and dont wanna be so how about you peel your coon skin off i can help you with that nigger
@chokoboy5578 Well, actually i am one quarter Italian (caucasian), one quarter Spanish (caucasian), one quarter English (caucasian) and one quarter Chilean Indio, a descendant of the Inca Empire 500 years ago, so I am able to tan in Summer and go a nice golden colour ;) lol i have the ancestry of some of the greatest Empires in the world and if I had a DNA test, a good 90% of me would be WHITE. There is no white mans trick I assimilate with Italians, Spanish, English and Mestizos.
@alejandroalexsosa well you should know that southern europians are not pure caucasian nothern europians dont even accept them as white but the point is how far your whilng to go just to say you have no black in you which is an impossiblity so the bigger picture is why do you think like that and if the great majority of history was written by people like you why would credit the black accomplishments again "whites" go out of there way to discredit blacks
@chokoboy5578 i have to 'go far' to say I have no black in me because you niggers are always so quick to make false claims that whites and now from what I just read - native indians have 'black' in them out of your own insecurity and denial that your race has been incapable of achieving the same things as others, so then the next reaction is to say we 'hide' your history. Bro, you still speak primitive tribal clicking languages today that don't have a written form.
A test the hypotheses of modern human origin in East Asia, we sampled 12,127 male individuals from 163 populations and typed for three Y chromosome biallelic markers (YAP, M89, and M130). All the individuals carried a mutation at one of the three sites. These three mutations (YAP+, M89T, and M130T) coalesce to another mutation (M168T), which originated in Africa about 35,000 to 89,000 years ago.
My prayer is that one day White people will face judgement. I hope that whatever inhumanity they have shown to us blacks, and others, they judgement and punishment would be greater.
@AlmightyJellybean (cont) I would like to point out though that I also was referring to the beginning of Egypt I mean humans first migrated into the middle east 50,000 years ago to think they only came back into north Africa 47,000 years later to my mind is ridiculous.
@AlmightyJellybean Well I have never heard any of these Euro claims but I agree they would be just as crazy as the Eurocentrics. I am actually fascinated by ancient African history and the simple fact that all modern humans originate from one small group of San is quite staggering. Yes you are right lets stick to the history.
@AlmightyJellybean Who as actually told you that we dont accept African civilisations? Of course we do, the only one we dont let you sign your name on is Egypt because that was a mixed civilisation and cannot be claimed by any one race. But we certainly accept Nubia as an East African civilisation, The Nok as a negroid civilisation it is when you get carried away and try to claim the Chinese, the Olmecs and that fucking Europeans were Albinos this is when we have to get you off the crazy boat!
@Dramactica Sure but that is because they are trying to link themselves to Egypt which was never a completely African civilization! Anyone who thinks Egypt was not very heavily influenced by the Mediterranean is a fool. Also the black Olmecs and Chinese nonsense makes them look primitive do you not think?
You’re mistaken. Ancient Egypt was completely African in origin. Ancient Egypt had a matriarchal system with the same social organization with other parts of Africa. In contrast, there has never been any proof of the existence of a paleo-Mediterranean matriarchy supposedly exclusively white. In fact, the ancient Egyptians always mentioned that their roots came from Africa. Ironically, the ancient Egyptians are the one who heavily influenced the Mediterranean.
@blackhaze21 BULLSHIT (A) the Egyptians say they came from the land of Punt and NOBODY knows where that is! Most real historians think it was in Southern Arabia! (B) Google "bradshawfoundation com/journey/" This is the official walkthrough of the single OOA theory and shows quite clearly the first settlers in North Africa after the Sahara began to retreat were Asians from the Levant! (D) Egypt was NEVER completely African in origins as we know by the older Ziggurats in Sumeria.
Majority of historians concede that land of punt is in Africa. In fact, depicted on the bas-reliefs are traditional African animals and materials, which are absence in southern Arabia.(B) That is irrelevant, North Africa has never been the starting point of the ancient Egyptian civilization,and Africans inhabited North Africa before the formation of the Sahara desert.(C) Sumer, prior to 8th century, constructed mounds with sun dried bricks compared to Egypt’s pyramids.
@blackhaze21 (A) To say the majority of historians accept Punt was in Africa is a complete fabrication (as you well know) in fact it is not proven that it actually existed at all! (B) ABSOLUTE NONSENSE the Sahara desert became completely inhabitable 90,000 years ago and wiped out all human life from Mali to the Levant and only became habitable again about 45,000 years ago when a group from Asia entered Egypt from the Levant,blacks only arrived in Egypt about 13,000 years ago! (cont)
(B) As I said before, North Africa was inhabited by Africans before it was desert and that’s a fundamental issue. But let’s say, for argument sake, it’s true Asians populated North Africa it’s irrelevant because the ancient Egyptians trace their origin to the Nile valley, not North Africa.
(a)You’re being quite disingenuous.The general consensus among the majority of scholars is that the land of punt is in East Africa,but the location within East Africa is debatable.After all, the bas-reliefs show typical African animals and scenery that is foreign to southern Arabia.Not to mention,all of the archeological evidences that supports that fact,but you what people to believe there’s a genuine debate between the Africa origin and purported Asia origin of punt.
@blackhaze21 (cont) and of course (C) It is irrelevant what materials were used in the Sumerian Ziggurats the fact is they were almost exactly the same design as the Egyptian and Nubian ones and nearly 1000 years older than both. Now considering we don't find Ziggurats of this type anywhere in Sub-Saharan Africa I think that is game over don't you?
(C) I’m really taken aback by your ignorance and your fraudulent statements. You seem to be proponent of the long discredited dynastic race theory. As some people may know, no trace of man earlier than 4000 B.C exists in Sumer. By that date the Egyptians had their feet on the threshold of their history. Sumer was still building with sun-dried bricks made of clay that rain transformed into a mass of mud. Egypt's pyramids and temples are still palpable today.
First off, what are you talking about? I'm talking about your comments about West African kingdoms and many whites don't believe it. Second, I believe you have some propaganda against African descent by your comments I read throughout this video. You can debate but the word "primitive" is a racist word and you know Africa IS NOT PRIMITIVE. Shame on YOU!
@Dramactica Well if a group of people are trying to suggest Ancient Egypt was purely made up of Nilotics or West Africans from Mali sailed across the Atlantic ocean 5,000 years ago and created the Olmec civilization then the only word to use for those people is primitive! Don't confuse my anti-Afrocentric line here with racism! Colour is not the problem here lack of education is.
@alejandroalexsosa wow i think you need to watch this again and also sense you see youtube videos as a credible source should also watch the other related videos and this one talks of the whites prejudice which blinded them to the FACT! that blacks had there own great civilizations and kingdoms one of which (amoung many) was the egyptions and even in europe were the moors (blacks) came and civilized europe during the middle ages
chokoboy5578 2 days ago
@alejandroalexsosa wow again you prove my point for me so you acknowledge that there is insentive for whites to distort our (mine and yours) colored history or more specificly black history we didnt influence everything (atleast in more modern times) but most things yes sense we started this whole notion of civilization which obviously didnt reach you also you didnt acknowledge what the olmecs looked like tell me what were there features just to be clear
chokoboy5578 2 days ago
@chokoboy5578 In what way did I prove your point, what point were you trying to make? If your point is that you are inferior then yes I proved it, but if that was not your point you need to read over the comments I posted on a 'white' invention in order for your naturally primitive brain to comprehend this language, which is also a 'white' language. You are an excellent troll.
alejandroalexsosa 2 days ago
@alejandroalexsosa have to reduce yourself futher with insults and what you say (though not true) is all fine and dandy but ill ask again what did the olmecs look like?
chokoboy5578 2 days ago
@alejandroalexsosa you still fail to tell me what the olmecs looked like
chokoboy5578 2 days ago
@alejandroalexsosa wow your last to comments proved my point better than any words i could ever say the video called the primitive negro MYTH! talks about how blacks being primitive was just a falsehood made up by whites for whites to justify there domination of blacks this is why me showing you evidence is useless cause just like with the video any evidence that doesnt support your centiment is either false or you blatently distort the obvious to support what you say funny
chokoboy5578 2 days ago
@chokoboy5578 i will also simplify it for your one dimensional American nigger mind, what a combination. Every culture/ethnicity/race that migrated or fleed war torn and corrupt countries to developed countries like Australia and the US, began in poverty like the nigger. The Jewish for example, have undergone greater hardships than any nigger. Italians, Greeks, Spanish - dont be fooled by your Mexicans - we had the brainpower to work our asses off together and become successful.
alejandroalexsosa 3 days ago
@alejandroalexsosa well you can believe your white or just mixed with white and native american which themselves have distant black roots if you want to look up the olmecs that is one example and no matter how you distort things that are facts like the origin of man there is an incentive for whites to distort and hide our history so that they can dominat us as a race cause thats one of the best ways to do so
chokoboy5578 3 days ago
@alejandroalexsosa also you keep calling me a nigger and for me that is fine but i will not stoop to your primitive level i am civilized enough to disregard that and not use slurs that are used by a man with no evidence or argument and saying nigger will not lighten your skin or whiten you up anyway i dont need slurs i have facts, historical evidence, and scientific evidence
chokoboy5578 3 days ago
@chokoboy5578 So what your saying is, because I call you a nigger you disregard the actual facts; historical and scientific evidence, that I have presented? I think you have because I said the Jewish underwent more hardship than any nigger, and are one of the most powerful ethnic groups in the world because they had the brain power to organise themselves, something HISTORY has shown YOU struggle to do - Compton, Queens, Baton Rouge, Baltimore - the entire continent of Africa?
alejandroalexsosa 3 days ago
@alejandroalexsosa oh you do realize that jews were kicked out of nearly every country in europe just cause they were jews even in the 20th century for example in germany (and every country they concerd) during the nazi regime, italy during the mussolini regime, and russia during the stalin regime along with others so jews didnt unit with anyone but themselves which i think made them stronger though they dont dominate like the white man in the modern era
chokoboy5578 3 days ago
@chokoboy5578 Jews do dominate 'like the white man' because if you were more well versed in this subject, you would know they ARE 'white'. East Asia has made its move into Africa now because of the resources they can capitalise from, but I don't see any of you pointing fingers at the chinks for your problems? Think about it from your 'scientific' view, regardless of the morality, the reasons the slavery existed and the capitalist regimes continue today was due to natural selection.
alejandroalexsosa 3 days ago
@alejandroalexsosa i know black people always say its because of white people that were in the situation were in now and thats true in many ways though its not the only reason its not just the slave trade aspect cause slavery was common in many civilizations it was the type of slavery which was revolutionary you can look up the willie lynch letters for elaboration also in the modern era the europian "scramble for africa" caused much damage to the black race to this very day
chokoboy5578 3 days ago
@chokoboy5578 You were inferior or less advanced and still are to this day-you can pretend you are righteous due to our immorality in natural selection, but if I was a nigger I would not sit here making outrageous claims that the entire world distorted facts that my ancestors were 'great' when really they were dominated by every civilisation. I would acknowledge the achievements of the Asians and the Europeans such as schooling, and use them to rise above my genes expectations.
alejandroalexsosa 3 days ago
@alejandroalexsosa your not really presenting facts just saying were primitive but how about this if your willing to civilize yourself long enough and do research i will present you with things to look up that will support "false claims" as you call it i doubt it will get through sense you seem unable to factor in any intellect when it comes to your beliefs like a religious person but if you can temporaily ill show you evidence to see for yourself can you do that?
chokoboy5578 3 days ago
@chokoboy5578 ahahaha fuck that was the funniest shit i have ever read. I refuted every ridiculous claim you made and your only response compares me to an ignorant follower of religion whilst talking down to me (haha the irony) AND saying that I presented no facts? Have a read of every comment I posted and reflect. You can 'present' your research just make sure they are peer reviewed sources or in other words, credible and I will happily 'civilise' myself to your nigger standard.
alejandroalexsosa 2 days ago
@alejandroalexsosa fine ill give you several resources though i doubt it will matter cause even though your colored you have the condecending additude of a white man and even believe your white and i wonder what is a credible source to you let me guess a white man that supports your false claim but like i said ill bring sources one good one is the video which we currently place our comments but il bring more and take on the job of attempting to civilize a savage (you)
chokoboy5578 2 days ago
@chokoboy5578 By the way I just researched the Olmecs you mentioned before. I read about the entire culture of the Olmecs, who are now extinct - so already your claim is useless, in Prehistoric Mesoamerica. They had the first linguistic writing in the Western hemisphere-credited with inventing the zero and the Mayan calendar. One speculation of their origin was that they were of African ancestry :/ but is not considered credible by vast majority of Mesoamerican researchers.
alejandroalexsosa 2 days ago
@alejandroalexsosa fuck what the meso american resaerchers say cause they (like you) are willing to go far length to discredit black greatness but did you look at the heads which probably portray the noblemen or leaders with there full lips and wide noses and other black features which could have only come from black ancestry but let me guess what you'll say thats not evidence enough they may look black but arent theres a reason why they look black oh please
chokoboy5578 2 days ago
@alejandroalexsosa finally to wrap up my point like the tactics of kings who gained the crown through a kodeta they tell the previous prince if young enough (if they let him live) that hes not royalty hes nothing and will always be nothing cause hes not of royal blood and its the same with black were told through history that we were never great and were just slaves and thats all we can be and people bellieve this cause whites disstorted the facts that we were great
chokoboy5578 3 days ago
@alejandroalexsosa also i can tell you are spanish by your name if it matchs who you really are (correct me if im wrong) and that makes me sad cause you and a whole lot of other hispanics have become gulibal and have fallen for the white mans tricks same as many of my people you hispanics have no selfasteam and think your white cause you hate being colored and you are colored which is why it doesnt matter to me if you call me a nigger
chokoboy5578 4 days ago
@chokoboy5578 There are more Hispanics than the Mexicans in the US you one dimensional nigger. Hispanics-and by that I mean White Hispanics, Castizos and Mestizos (NOT mullatos who are really just black) have achieved more than any nigger and in the case of financial wealth, have achieved more than the 'white oppressor' - the richest man in the world is Mexican. We have more people in political power, richer businessmen, our women are arguably the most beautiful in the world etc.
alejandroalexsosa 3 days ago
@alejandroalexsosa well ok my spelling is off big deal but the fact of the matter is all humans have 1 ancestor in common which they call scientific eve (mind thats a fact) she is a black african that in africa (after the nomadic period) settled and got there civilization together then took it on the road so if those people that migrated from africa were black how can the people who settled in eurasia not atleast in the begining be black
chokoboy5578 4 days ago
@chokoboy5578 That is what they say, but if you want throw around theories I can throw around the multiregional origin of modern humans which suggested all originated in different areas around the world except Africa, evolving from and interbreeding with the Neanderthal man. So all that leaves us with, is the evolution of man and his achievements - the most significant of which lie in the Mediterranean, Eastern Europe and East Asia.
alejandroalexsosa 3 days ago
Research: The Original Black Cultures of Eastern Europe and Asia
TheBowie83 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Peopling of the Nile Valley
a survey of mainstream of archaeology and anthropology research
What did you find out, about the Tarim mummies. 2000 or 1,200BC. The civilization in Egypt Badarian Culture 5,000 to 4,000 BC . Do you understand, by the 4th dynasty the great pyrimads were built.
TheBowie83 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Cont.. hopelessly incapable of acquiring the knowledge requisite to progress. It was southern colored peoples everywhere, in China, in Central America, in India, Mesopotamia, Syria, Egypt and Crete who gave the northern white peoples civilization
TheBowie83 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Bishop William Montgomery Brown: "For the first two or three thousand years of civilization, there was not a civilized white man on the earth. Civilization was founded and developed by the swarthy races of Mesopotamia, Syria and Egypt, and the white race remained so barbaric that in those days an Egyptian or a Babylonian priest would have said that the riffraff of white tribes a few hundred miles to the north of their civilization were
TheBowie83 2 weeks ago
@noobkingramsley I don't think anyone thinks you are stupid but going all over the world trying to stick the black Label on culture we know were not African does not help your cause any does it?
greeny202a 3 weeks ago
Fact: Literacy of any kind didn't come to the English people until the Romans invaded in 41 AD. They had no writing system nor architectures and they weren't on the verge of creating any. The Romans literately had to teach those cave men how to wear cloths and write their own names. After the dark ages, the Moors had to re-civilize them because most were illiterate.
nightmarehammer 3 weeks ago
Isn't "The Primitive Negro" redundant?
TheTempleofEthan 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
black people never invented anything? This video was just recently uploaded, the invention said to be "good chance of being the best thing on Earth" - Paul Werbos. A battery that uses heat as energy and if put in a car, the car would go 1,000 miles instead of 300 or less on a full tank of gas. Check this out.
watch?v=el5AZRyOA6Y&feature=related
Gee I wonder why this isn't being talked about much through the media? This is a big change, maybe because a black man invented it.
bigb771 3 weeks ago
Some harsh words from those explorers about the savage nature of Africans. It's funny how we are uncivilized yet they invaded our continent and stole our culture and corrupted it and now selling it to people as real history. Africans are still going through the natural process of evolution which makes us more in tuned with the world than anyone else. We will rise to God status and endure all that you will throw at us. Real history is written in stone and embedded in our DNA.
marcb2raw 1 month ago
@marcb2raw Well said.
kodonga 3 weeks ago
@noobkingramsley Indeed.
SundiataOfMali 1 month ago
Learned something new :D
ragna06 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Humans migrated from Africa about 100,000 BC as fully human people. Advanced culture also migrated from Africa about 60,000 to 50,000 BC One group migrated to various parts of Africa, particularly the Sahara and West Africa. Another group migrated to Southern Europe and the Middle East (Grimaldi Negroids), another went to India. More migrated to East Asia’s southern regions and to Australia and Melanesia
TheBowie83 1 month ago
@TheBowie83 Horseshit I'm afraid mate.
greeny202a 3 weeks ago
You need to do some research in the area. I researched Egypt Culture for several months. I studied all ethnic groups , timelines and cultures I researched the Berbers the Indigenous peoples of North African. That was a Lie. Came from Germany . But Civilization did come up from the Upper to the Lower. Also, research the unification of Egypt. It is more pyrimads in Sudan than Egypt . They are the same people( Nubians), they did not share political views
TheBowie83 1 month ago
The conclusion will be they are all Black African Negro Cutlures. Then again Africans came into Middle East and settled. They came as immigrant groups like the Kushites, the Egyptians, the Punitians/Phoenicians (People of Punt). They blended together and became the later Black Israelites, the Black Syrians and Canaanites They established themselves in the land and built many amazing cultures and civilizations.
TheBowie83 1 month ago
The main part of my comment was the Natufian Culture:, Your comment: agriculture as we all know came to Africa from the middle east who domesticated wheat roughly 12,000 years ago They were African Negroes
TheBowie83 1 month ago
Halfan culture, Qadan and Sebilian cultures,Mushabian culture,Harifian culture, ,Faiyum A culture,Merimde culture,El Omari culture,Maadi culture,Tasian culture Badarian culture,Naqada culture ,Amratian culture (Naqada I),Gerzean culture (Naqada II) and Protodynastic Period (Naqada III) Research these Cutlures; The concludes will be from BlAfriacn Negroes Origins
TheBowie83 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These Mediterranean people called themselves: KUSHITES
So, what did you find out, about the Naqada and badarian Cultures
TheBowie83 1 month ago
You need to read ,about the Natufian Culture. The Arabs invaded Northern Africa in 700AD. the Berbers or Barbar arrivied in the 400AD from Germany, and Summerinas: what is that word again Africoid. Skeletons of the Mediterranean type have been found throughout Middle Africa, Southwest Asia, Mesopotamia, Indo-Pakistan, Central Asia and China. It is no secret that the founders of ancient Egypt, Elam, Sumer and the Indus Valley were all of the Mediterranean type.
TheBowie83 1 month ago
@TheBowie83 WOW! I cant make head nor tail of your last comment LOl! I suppose I had better start with your definitions again. The term Africaoid is a complete nonsense because there are three completely different phenotypes in Africa and cannot be grouped together. That would be like saying Europoid LOL. To be honest with you I know you have tried to research this stuff thoroughly but it doesn't make any sense does it? Look in order to understand the Mediterranean cultures (cont)
greeny202a 1 month ago
@TheBowie83 (cont) whether it be Egypt, The Minoans, The Etruscan's, the Phoenicians, whoever you must look back to the first instance of agriculture anywhere in the world which is Southeast Europe and the Middle east about 12,000 ya, and the relationship agriculture had to these civilizations! It was the Natufians that spread the domesticated wheat grass to the Fertile Crescent in Southern Iraq who in turn used it to create a continuous farming culture about 10,000 years ago (cont)
greeny202a 1 month ago
@TheBowie83 (cont) which would later become the first civilization on earth SUMERIA. Now forget Western Europe, forget North Africa because there was nothing there this early. Sure there were the ancestors of the Celts in Britain and France and the Germanics but nothing coming close to civilization similarly the only thing in Saharan Africa so early was the Kerma culture in southern Sudan but again no where near civilization level. Now we know that the first culture North of the Saharha (cont)
greeny202a 1 month ago
@TheBowie83 (cont) id the Libu (Libya) because we have found mummies 5000 years old suggesting a culture from at least 5,500 but we do not know which direction they came from whether they were settlers from Crete or from Mesopotamia in the East but the point is there was civilization on either side of Egypt long before it began there. So my question to you is why do you think a civilization arose independently in Egypt from the Kerma culture in the south when there was already (cont)
greeny202a 1 month ago
@TheBowie83 (cont) much older civilizations on either side of it??? If you look at ancient history from all over the Mediterranean and not just Egypt you will find it is not impossible but extremely unlikely that civilization came up the Nile from the South.
greeny202a 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Great Lies has been told. Those lies were told for generations. Your Great, great Grandfather, great grandfather, grand Father, father, mother, and Governent, believed in those lies to be the truth. But they were only lies. Once the truth comes out people like you, become furious and frustrated. You still want to believe in those lies and die for them. But they were only LIES
TheBowie83 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
archaeological and historical evidence all indicate that Europe was not the homeland of the White race. It would appear from the evidence that the ancient Greeks were Blacks. Moreover, it is clear that these blacks taught the Europeans civilization and government and that these symbols of government and civilization can not be claimed solely as the property of Europeans
TheBowie83 1 month ago
Also, research Ptolomy Sotor 1
TheBowie83 1 month ago
Is this better:
Once you know the ancient people of Egypt were Africoid, it destroys the philosophical and regilious beliefs of the Arabs.(Islam) Greek(B),, European(B) Christianity.Persians, and Jewish Research the Badarian Culture first Civilization in Upper Egypt
The Badarian culture provides the earliest direct evidence of agriculture in Upper Egypt during the Predynastic Era. It flourished between 4400 and 4000 BCE,[2] and might have already existed as far back as 5000 BC
TheBowie83 1 month ago
@TheBowie83 But the point is my friend, agriculture as we all know came to Africa from the middle east who domesticated wheat roughly 12,000 years ago You are not telling me that the Arabs brought agriculture with them but nothing else? Google "Gobekli Tepe" and look at the level of sophistication required to erect the structure! Now this is about 8,000 years before the pyramids, the idea of Egypt being isolated from the older civilizations like Sumeria for 8,000 years is impossible to believe!
greeny202a 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
f Upper Egypt and Nubia had the greatest biological affinity to people of the Sahara and more southerly areas.
Research : The Badarian, Natufian and Naqada Cultures. The Ancient people of Thebes were Black Africans. During the 25 dynasty, the Nubians were in control of Egypt again. The Ancient Kemet the ancient name of Egypt or Ethiopia. The where the Ancient peoples of Chem and Egypt
TheBowie83 2 months ago
Research:Peopling of the Nile Valley - a knol by Mainstream Academic Research
There is now a sufficient body of evidence from modern studies of skeletal remains to indicate that the ancient Egyptians, especially southern Egyptians, exhibited physical characteristics that are within the range of variation for ancient and modern indigenous peoples of the Sahara and tropical Africa. In general, the inhabitants of Upper Egypt and Nubia had the greatest biological affinity to people of the
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 I think where you theory seems to be tripping itself up is in your definitions you say "black" then you say "negroes" Please before we go any further define the words "black" and "negroe"
greeny202a 2 months ago
The Ancient Egytpains weer pure Negroes. The Modern Egytpains were Afro- Asians. A new Breed of people.
TheBowie83 2 months ago
This Very Important
The scheme of weakening the Blacks by turning their half-white brothers against them cannot be over emphasized…these Black mothers remained slaves while their Mulatto sons and daughters were born free and classified as white.” However, some Blacks colluded with the Asians and freely gave up their daughters as gifts, destined to become concubines, appeasing the invaders while African villages were raided for women to be exported to Asia
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 Well I dont know what you are talking about now but you seem to think that anyone from north Africa who is not Negroid is mixed and I am sorry to have to tell you that this is nonsense! And you keep using the word "black" to describe the first Egyptians! The word "black" is completely meaningless, it does not tell you if they were Negroid or North African does it????? The simple fact is the first humans in the Saharan Region would definitely not have been Negroids from the South.
greeny202a 2 months ago
Cultural Cleansing
The first modern Egyptians were half African, half-Asian who were largely hostile to their Black mothers. This attitude stemmed from an opportunistic desire to identify with and become part of the new power elite of the conquerors. Egypt became all white. The mulattoes were classified as white in Egypt, all North Africa and the Middle East-a fact that still confuses Blacks in America where the very opposite policy was adopted
TheBowie83 2 months ago
In the beginning,Egypt was all black, this pattern remain unbroken over generations and still in the end become near white in color with not a black face in the royal lineage. The invading conquerors not only capture and control all political and economic power bu military might, but, even though they might be nomandic barbarains, they generally claim to be from a higher civilization and therefore, reinforce the nyth of being superior in fact, and not jut because of military conquest
TheBowie83 2 months ago
was entirely an all African city, white Asian villages slowly grew
TheBowie83 2 months ago
You do not know, but The Bowies does. they did not vanish
The Palermo Stone records victory after victory over the Asians. Great triumph came when Afrcian king Mens defeated the Asians decisively and united all Egypt under African rule again, beginning the historic First Dynasty. There was no Egypt before the black king from whose name it was indirectly derive. The country was called Chem or Chemi, inhabitants by blacks, not the color of the soil For generations Memphis
TheBowie83 2 months ago
You need to research the Nubians. So, what peole were in the Badarian and Naqada Cultures. Please, explain
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 We do not know who they were we only know by DNA of their descendants and we do not find a single group from north Africa with Sub-Saharan markers! There is of course a small chance that a band of roaming Negroids settled there and then built the Egyptian civilization and then vanished completely from the region leaving no descendants but its all pure conjecture. There is a massive genetic difference between Saharan and Sub-Saharan Africans my friend.
greeny202a 2 months ago
Thebes was the most important single city in the entire history of the black people. The history of Black Africa might well begin at Thebes. For this was truly the "Eternal City of the Blacks" that presented the most compelling evidence that they were the builders of the earliest civilization in Chem, later called Egypt, as well as the great civilization in the South
The people of Chem-Thebes (Ancient Egypt) were pure Negroes. Modern Egyptians were African and Asians (Afro-Asians)
TheBowie83 2 months ago
study of the black man's history we may find ourselves
constantly misled or puzzled if we forget that practically all the names and
terms in use are not African names and terms, but Greek, Roman, Arabic,
Anglo-Saxon, etc. Some of the more recent pre-European and pre-Asian/African
names, however, have been rediscovered. One of these earlier names for Thebes
was Nowe, the Na-Amun of the Bible and ancient Hebrew writers
TheBowie83 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Among the criteria accepted in physical anthropology for classifying races, the osteological measurements are perhaps the least misleading (in contrast to craniometry) for distinguishing a black man from a white man. By this criterion, also, the Egyptians belong among the black races. This study was made by the distinguished German savant Lepsius at the end of the nineteenth century and his conclusions remain valid
TheBowie83 2 months ago
Name calling again: Research the Badarian and Naqada Cultures. Once you finish write me back.
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 I know all about those cultures so what? Are you suggesting that they were Negroids? If so where is your evidence? We don't even know where the Egyptians of 3000 years ago came from never mind 7000! You see this is the problem with you Americans.. Intelligence Quotient or lack of! All your theories and assertions are nothing more than pure conjecture and even worse you have an idea of Negroid Egypt in your heads and are trying to manufacture evidence to fit your delusion. Sad.
greeny202a 2 months ago
@greeny202a Yes, the the Ancient Egytians were pure Black African. No, you do not know,the cultures. Skeletons of the Mediterranean type have been found throughout Middle Africa, Southwest Asia, Mesopotamia, Indo-Pakistan, Central Asia and China. It is no secret that the founders of ancient Egypt, Elam, Sumer and the Indus Valley were all of the Mediterranean type. These Mediterranean people called themselves: KUSHITES
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 Pay no attention to the pro white ranting lunatic. Here's a ugly fact. Literacy of any kind didn't come to the English people until Romans invaded in 41 AD. They had no writing system nor architectures and weren't on the verge of creating any. The Romans literately had to teach those angry, stupid cave men how to write their own names. That's why the Romans called them "Brittunculi" (little Britains) because they were backwards, war mad children. Many of them haven't changed.
nightmarehammer 2 months ago
@nightmarehammer Actually the Romans did not call it Britain at all it was called "Great Britain" much later on meaning the bigger of the two Britains Great Britain and lesser Britain which is still today called Brittany in Northern France. And as for architecture I would look for Stonehenge, Newgrange, Hothgar, Castlrigg etc all of which predate the Egyptian pyramids. In short shut the fuck up you jealous black twat!
greeny202a 2 months ago
With the Ancient Egyptians, research the Badarian and Naqada Cultures
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 Look you racist Afrocentric buffoon! If Egypt 5000 years ago did not have any Europeans or Arabs it would have been the only fucking country bordering the Mediterranean that did so!!! Sure there MUST have been some Nubians up there too but Europeans and Arabs have been populating every country around the Mediterranean since we invented boats at 12,000 years ago at the end of the last Ice age!
greeny202a 2 months ago
Google:A San bushman with Dr. Spencer Wells Photograph: National Geographic Society
TheBowie83 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That is: they're the oldest people, being most closely related to the first anatomically modern human populations, and (being genetically ancient, still living in the place where they've always lived, climatically stable since the late Pleistocene, still surviving by hunting and gathering even today) most likely to resemble the founder population of all non-Africans.
I'm afraid to report,greeny202a, your ancestors were, indeed, black
TheBowie83 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That is: they're the oldest people, being most closely related to the first anatomically modern human populations, and (being genetically ancient, still living in the place where they've always lived, climatically stable since the late Pleistocene, still surviving by hunting and gathering even today) most likely to resemble the founder population of all non-Africans.
I'm afraid to report,greeny202a, your ancestors were, indeed, black
TheBowie83 2 months ago
Name calling again Black Africian haplogroup is a better term.Homo sapiens sapiens evolved 200,000 years ago on the Atlantic seaboard of southwestern Africa in what is today the border between Angola and Namibia.
This is, of course, the ancestral heartland of San hunter-gatherers, sometimes known as 'Bushman' people. This is pleasing both to archeologists and geneticists since their MtDNA tells us that San people are at the end of the deepest branch of all human populations
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 HA HA HA HA LOL@ you Atlantic seaboard!!!!!! There is not a single peer reviewed paper to back that bullshit up!!!! Go away!
greeny202a 2 months ago
@greeny202a But it is. What language. The white sub race was developed from Black Albinism.
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 Really is that so.... And what of the Asians??? Were they developed from Black short arse slanty eyeism?????? You are just a black racist dick head!
greeny202a 2 months ago
The history books need to be rewritten to tell the truth.
TheBowie83 2 months ago
I can careless, about your personal feelings,. The facts only. Telling the truth. Research: White" haplogroups; like R1 and R2, are instead, indisputably "Black" haplogroups. As always; all roads lead "Back" to the Black man. Modern
White European Y-DNA which clearly shows that there is NO uniquely "White" haplogroups; but rather, all White DNA is derived from Black haplogroups.
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 There is no such thing as a "black haplogroup" you buffoon! Whether you are white, black, yellow, brown, red or fucking purple with green spots we all descend from a single group of North East African San who were neither Negroid nor white but somewhere in between! Have a look at some pictures of the san on here and you will see there is absolutely no scientific reason to believe they were any different 50,000 years ago.
greeny202a 2 months ago
I disagree with this.They didn't like us from day one!
It had nothing to do with slavery or colonization.Parts of Asia and all Americas were colonized too...I don't recall anyone denying those people their history despite that.
The irrational and disgusting hatred against Black People started long before slavery even existed!!!
SundiataOfMali 2 months ago
The original African ancestor of all humans today were not the same black Africans . I do agree, but they were Black Africans or people of color
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 We are all people of colour! just some less colour than others. I do apologise for what my ancestors did to yours but the only thing this black power bullshit is going to give your people is a wooden box! And i am drunk sorry!!!!
greeny202a 2 months ago
@greeny202a Go slice your wrists, boy
SundiataOfMali 2 months ago
@SundiataOfMali Go shrink your head! You people will still be blaming whites when the continent of Africa has died of starvation and famine! Sort yourself out and stop bleating on about being oppressed! Im sick of hearing this African bullshit!
greeny202a 2 months ago
@greeny202a Maybe youll stop hearing about it when the west spots exploiting them. And if youre tired of hearing it why are you on their videos?
newfish09 2 months ago
@newfish09 Look mate are you serious? Yes they have been exploited fair enough but I am on these videos because there maybe African Americans on here looking for actual science and truth and they get presented with the Afrocentric unsubstantiated drivel written by TheBowie83 below. Every Anthropologist, Geneticist and Archeologist worth his money accepts that the birthplace of the modern human was central Ethiopia about 250,000 ya resulting in a most recent common ancestor 150,000 ya (cont)
greeny202a 2 months ago
@greeny202a "they get presented with the Afrocentric unsubstantiated" and with comments about they havent built past mud huts in 9000 years of recorded history.
newfish09 2 months ago
@newfish09 I never said they have built nothing but mud huts. The West Africans have built various kingdoms like The Nok or the Ife or even Benin but they had as much to do with Ancient Egypt as a fucking Eskimo!
greeny202a 2 months ago
@greeny202a Well you cant blame them, their history was taken. a better alternative would be to show both.
newfish09 2 months ago
@newfish09 Oh I don't blame them at all! If they are not shown the truth they will believe what they see, I blame the stupid Afrocentrics who most of which know all too well Ancient Egyptians could not have been West African Negroids but still make up their bullshit anyway. Why do people like yourself who are obviously a little more intelligent make your own videos about the Library at Timbuktu and the great walls of Benin or the astronomers of the Dogon but leave Egypt to the North Africans!
greeny202a 2 months ago
@greeny202a
that's never going to happen. west African kingdoms was destroy without any records.
Dramactica 3 weeks ago
@newfish09 (cont) I am all for West Africans having pride in their people especially post slavery but NOT AT THE EXPENSE OF SCIENTIFIC TRUTH AND HISTORY! And bare in mind not just African history but the history of all mankind too.
greeny202a 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@greeny202a "And bare in mind not just African history but the history of all mankind too." Im sure the rest of mankind doesnt care...
newfish09 2 months ago
Here we go again with the name calling.The Andaman Islanders (in the Indian Ocean), are genetically very close to the Ainu people..
TheBowie83 2 months ago
It may be said that Coon's major contributions to science were the fruitful ... or that all of his data should be thrown out because some of his theories were wrong. .... hermetically sealed races (Australoid, Capoid, Caucasoid, Congoid, Mongoloid
TheBowie83 2 months ago
When I first researching the race of the Ancient Egyptians, I was puzzled. In my research, they label the Ancient people of Ethiopia as Caucasian . I had several friends from Ethiopia. I asked a lady from Ethiopia , if she was Caucasian . She laughed at me, stating. I am just like you.
TheBowie83 2 months ago
Are the Khoisan people from Africa origins. Yes/No. Please explain.
TheBowie83 2 months ago
Another white racist remark: A genetic study done by researchers from all over the world: China, Japan, U.S.A. U.K. and other countries, and published in 2001; definitively answered the question of Chinese origins. The findings were that the original Chinese were 100% pure Black African, with absolutely no outside admixture - But here again, we are talking about the original Black Chinese, modern Chinese are quite different
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 NO IT DOES NOT SHOW THAT AT ALL! It shows that the chinese are descended from the out of Africa migrators the same as we all are no one knows whether they were black or not! Stop trying to insert the word black all the time because it infers they were Negroid when we already know that Negroids had not yet evolved when humans left Africa. There are no races today we are all the same but modern day Negroids are a modern phenotype and did not exist 70,000 years ago. (cont)
greeny202a 2 months ago
@greeny202aThe Ainu are an ancient Black people, who were part of the second out of Africa (OOA) migration event that went to China (circa 50,000 B.C.). Another people who were a part of that event: the Jomon, immigrated to Japan at about 35,000 B.C, the Ainu followed at about 13,000 B.C. (By then, the Ainu might have been admixed to some degree - see below). Today, the Ainu have been admixed with modern Japanese (who arrived in Japan at about 350 B.C.), to the point of extinction
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 (cont) why can you Afrocentrics not understand that? One last time-The original African ancestor of all humans today were not the same black Africans that we see there today! Negroids, Capoids, Somalids, Berbers, Europeans Asians, Indians, Australasians and Native Amercans are all modern phenotypes and did not exist 50,000 years ago the only humans around then were the more generic San type that every human alive shares a common ancestor with! Stop it with the black brother bullshit!
greeny202a 2 months ago
Please define San people.........KHOE and SAN are pure blood Negroes
TheBowie83 2 months ago
Are you alright or does the truth hurts that much. Once again google: Khoisan and Africa Phenotypes. What did you find? Did you see the Negroes with the epicanthic eyes Yes/No. Please read and research :Khoisan (also spelled Khoesaan, Khoesan or ( DO YOU GET IT NOW) KHOE-SAN is a unifying name for two ethnic groups of Southern Africa, who share physical and putative linguistic characteristics distinct from the Bantu majority of the region. I was never wrong in my comments.
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 NO! there are no Negroids with the FULL EXTERIOR EPICANTHIC EYE FOLD because like Europeans you no longer carry the gene for it only the East African Capoids and the Asians still carry it. You my friend have an Afrocentrism problem you are trying to suggest that anyone from Africa with a big ole nose and big ole lips are negroid and I'm sorry but that is not the case. The Negroid phenotype is an adaptation to South West Africa from the much more ancient East African phenotype.
greeny202a 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 (cont) Yes it is true that some remote West African groups can still have the partial Epicanthic eye fold just as some Scandinavians in Europe still can but the Asian full eye fold is impossible. The definition of Negroid is the pronounced prognasthism and the amount of Dolichocephalicism! Quite frankly if you think there is no difference between a San, A Kenyan and someone from Nigeria you are either fooling yourself or working to an agenda.
greeny202a 2 months ago
You need to start reading books. Did you google: Khoisan and Africa Phenotypes. Did you see the Negroes with the epicanthic eyes. Google: Human Migration: Africa, Khoisan, (Khoi + San), Y haplogroup
The Celts and Germans who migrated into Europe from the place of their evolution, (the Eurasian Plains): exterminated the Khoisan inhabitants of Europe and seized their lands.
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 Wrong yet again!!! 15% of modern Europeans are descended from the San and the group of Asians that entered Europe were also descended from the first group of San so we are all the same. My friend you really have got this backwards. Seriously watch the whole series of "the incredible human journey" it goes from "out of Africa" to "Asia" to "Europe" to "Australia". I guarantee you will learn something.
greeny202a 2 months ago
What book came I read to find this information. Are you serious.........
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 Yes try a video on YouTube called "9 - Human Ancestry Made Easy" by Potholer54 (fantastic videos) and try "the incredible human journey" this one is from the BBC they are both independent and professional videos and unlike you have no Afrocentric bias. The first shows quite clearly that it is the San that is the original model. Negroids are a later adaptation to tropical West Africa.
greeny202a 2 months ago
Khoisan can do that so it is impossible for black negroid Africans to be the original model
By writing this statement we are in agreement. Google: Khosian, Please, inform me of your findings. Also, google: African phenotypes
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 NO! the Khoisan were not Negroid!!!!! The Negroids are descendants of the San just like the Asians or the Europeans! You are getting confused by using the word black because it is meaningless! They were only black because they lived close to the equator and Africans that still live there today still look like that but genetically are not the same. Watch the video "the incredible human journey" ep 1, 7:00 the original humans were neither negroid or European but in between.
greeny202a 2 months ago
Khoisan: The genetic structure of the indigenous hunter-gatherer peoples of southern Africa, the oldest known lineage of modern human, is important for understanding human diversity. Studies based on mitochondrial1 and small sets of nuclear markers2 have shown that these hunter-gatherers, known as Khoisan, San, or Bushmen, are genetically divergent from other humans. They are Negores. Do you understand
TheBowie83 2 months ago
Why are you associating my comments as racist. I am not giving out in correct information. Research the :Kurgan Culture
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 Are you serious?!!? I'm beginning to think you are trolling! (A) Negroids cannot produce the epicanthic eye fold that the Asians have only the Khoisan can do that so it is impossible for black negroid Africans to be the original model! Please forget your African superiority complex and watch "the incredible human journey" on YouTube and learn some REAL facts and history of your people and mine.
greeny202a 2 months ago
My comments are not base upon a superiority complex or hate. Just tell the truth. You have know ideal , about the Khoisan people. Do you.......... Once again name calling. Your comment: Negroids cannot produce the epicanthic eye fold that the Asians have only the Khoisan can do that so it is impossible for black negroid Africans to be the original model! My writing this statement we are in agreement. Google: Khosian, Please, inform me of your findings. Also, google: African phenotypes
TheBowie83 2 months ago
Why are you associating my comments as hate. I am giving out incorrect information. I have made no racist comments. You are the one calling me out of my name. Research the Kurgan Culture
dudley1957 2 months ago
Khoisan type peoples walked across the Gibraltar straits and entered Europe
TheBowie83 2 months ago
The ancient Whites of Europe, had no knowledge of history (they came as illiterate nomads), so they made it up as they went. They created "Myth" for everything that they didn't know or understand. But over time, as they did gain knowledge, the educated amoung them started to question their myths
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 Its a shame you have such hatred for whites because keep repeating your racist nonsense is only going to make future life for your people difficult with the whites.
greeny202a 2 months ago
Go to this web site:Meet the black Brazilian mother who has three white children Think first: A white male and female can not produce the phenotype of a Black African. A Black male and female can produce phenotypes of other races. Research:The Origins of The Alien Albino Mutant Caucasians
TheBowie83 2 months ago
No - man is not going to change his skin color in 6-12,000 years - At least not by "EVOLUTION". But; man with a hereditary gene defect like color-blindness, Sickle-cell anemia, or Albinism: who is forced by Societal abuse and climatic difficulty: to "SEGREGATE" themselves and "INBREED", well that's a different thing entirely. They could create an entirely new subspecies of Humans - all with that particular gene defect - in a relatively short time. The average Human female
TheBowie83 2 months ago
Further proof of White and Black Mongol admixture, is with the "Tarim mummies" which are a series of mummies (dating from 1,800 B.C.) discovered in the Tarim Basin in present-day Xinjiang, which is on the border with Central Asia, in northwest China. The oldest mummies are White people, but later, at about 1,100 B.C, they become "mixed-race. Research the Tarim Baisn mummies. Why do you label people, racist, idiot,and dumbass? Whose the dumbass now.
TheBowie83 2 months ago
These Albinos continued on to Central Asia, where they settled. It seems logical to assume that over the many thousands of years that it took for these migrants to reach northern Asia, that there would have been some interbreeding between the Mongols and the Albinos; which probably allowed the Albinos to gain some fixed degree of pigmentation. Proof of this admixture, is in the fact that Whites and Mongols (Chinese), both share the same
TheBowie83 2 months ago
Therefore, the data do not support even a minimal in situ hominid contribution in the origin of anatomically modern humans in East Asia
The white people was developed from Black Albinism. A genetic disorder. After thousands of years mating
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 Seriously pal, what is the name of the website you get this stuff from?
greeny202a 2 months ago
@greeny202a I came on this video by mistake--and who do I see on here--Mr. Green.. hehehehehe
biotictec 2 months ago
@biotictec LOL hello again. Yes i am addicted to the Afrocentric sites now, with the greatest respect they just get crazier and crazier! Seriously I had an American guy on one of them trying to tell me that William Shakespeare was black because the name "will of the shaking spear" was a common warriors name in the kingdom of Benin! Another says that Europeans were actually police left here by reptilian aliens to subdue the black masses! Its better than TV....
greeny202a 2 months ago
@greeny202a You know what it the say way with these crazy Eurocentrists still talking the same old crap. One Crazy Eurocentric told me the Ancient Egyptians were Aliens from Mar. This is a crazy world we living in today!! Dam!!!!!!
biotictec 2 months ago
@greeny202a By reading allot of books and materials. If I am wrong prove it. What group of people have the oldest DNA.
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 The oldest DNA on earth is that of the Khoisan of Eastern Africa they are believed to be the direct descendants of the original human model about 250,000 years old. The next oldest is the blacks (West Africans) they split from the San about 120,000 years ago and then it is the North Africans. What is your point? Yes the bllacks are about 50,000 years older than Europeans but the San are at least 150,000 years older than the blacks! So what?
greeny202a 2 months ago
@greeny202a What in the world are you communicating
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 Im communicating that you are an idiot if you think white people are albinos. You crazy blacks are not doing anything to disprove your dumb negro stereotypes.
greeny202a 2 months ago
@greeny202a No, I am not a Idiot., No, Negro steritopes. No, racisem. Communiacted, about the truth. Research the Kurgan Culture and Cord Culture. If the oldest DNA is the Khoisan .Confirmation that the White (Caucasian) Race is derived from Albinos, is documented in the findings from genetic analysis of Y-DNA haplogroup "R".
Andreas Deffner:Andreas Deffner Vita→ Vita
White, too white
A Portrait of Albinism in India
August 24 to December 15 2006
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 If I were you I would research the medical condition called Albinism before making yourself look even more foolish and racist. I cannot understand why you think that attacking white people makes your position stronger? If you can go in the sun and get a tan then you CANNOT be Albino. African Americans are such dumb asses, well thats what you get for transporting only the physically fittest slaves over to the New World and breeding them together paying no attention to intelligence.
greeny202a 2 months ago
@greeny202a The second (OOA) migration event, saw Blacks from Africa with straight hair and "Mongol features" take an "Inland route" through southern Asia and on up to China, where they settled. Included with this group, were straight haired Blacks "without" Mongol features - now called "Dravidians" who stayed close to Africa, and settled in India and other areas of southern Asia. Also included with this second (OOA) group were Albinos, who were probably motivated by a quest
TheBowie83 2 months ago
By a quest for relief from the heat and burning Sunshine of southern Africa - and relief from the torment heaped upon them by normal Africans. Even today, superstitious Blacks of southern Africa; maim and mutilate Albinos in the ignorant belief that their body parts process magical properties, which they use in rituals.
TheBowie83 2 months ago
@TheBowie83 WRONG! (A) they were NOT blacks from Africa they were the San ancestors who were neither black nor white but half way between the two.(B) Please watch "the incredible human journey" on YouTube on episode 1 got straight to 7:00 and it will show you exactly who the first people to leave Africa were and I can assure you they were not black Negroids.
greeny202a 2 months ago
@greeny202a wow ive read your comments and it seems to me that you are mad that your a nigger and dont wanna be so how about you peel your coon skin off i can help you with that nigger
chokoboy5578 4 days ago
@chokoboy5578 Well, actually i am one quarter Italian (caucasian), one quarter Spanish (caucasian), one quarter English (caucasian) and one quarter Chilean Indio, a descendant of the Inca Empire 500 years ago, so I am able to tan in Summer and go a nice golden colour ;) lol i have the ancestry of some of the greatest Empires in the world and if I had a DNA test, a good 90% of me would be WHITE. There is no white mans trick I assimilate with Italians, Spanish, English and Mestizos.
alejandroalexsosa 3 days ago
@alejandroalexsosa well you should know that southern europians are not pure caucasian nothern europians dont even accept them as white but the point is how far your whilng to go just to say you have no black in you which is an impossiblity so the bigger picture is why do you think like that and if the great majority of history was written by people like you why would credit the black accomplishments again "whites" go out of there way to discredit blacks
chokoboy5578 3 days ago
@chokoboy5578 i have to 'go far' to say I have no black in me because you niggers are always so quick to make false claims that whites and now from what I just read - native indians have 'black' in them out of your own insecurity and denial that your race has been incapable of achieving the same things as others, so then the next reaction is to say we 'hide' your history. Bro, you still speak primitive tribal clicking languages today that don't have a written form.
alejandroalexsosa 3 days ago
A test the hypotheses of modern human origin in East Asia, we sampled 12,127 male individuals from 163 populations and typed for three Y chromosome biallelic markers (YAP, M89, and M130). All the individuals carried a mutation at one of the three sites. These three mutations (YAP+, M89T, and M130T) coalesce to another mutation (M168T), which originated in Africa about 35,000 to 89,000 years ago.
TheBowie83 2 months ago
My prayer is that one day White people will face judgement. I hope that whatever inhumanity they have shown to us blacks, and others, they judgement and punishment would be greater.
ajahamza 2 months ago
@AlmightyJellybean (cont) I would like to point out though that I also was referring to the beginning of Egypt I mean humans first migrated into the middle east 50,000 years ago to think they only came back into north Africa 47,000 years later to my mind is ridiculous.
greeny202a 2 months ago
@AlmightyJellybean Well I have never heard any of these Euro claims but I agree they would be just as crazy as the Eurocentrics. I am actually fascinated by ancient African history and the simple fact that all modern humans originate from one small group of San is quite staggering. Yes you are right lets stick to the history.
greeny202a 2 months ago
@AlmightyJellybean Who as actually told you that we dont accept African civilisations? Of course we do, the only one we dont let you sign your name on is Egypt because that was a mixed civilisation and cannot be claimed by any one race. But we certainly accept Nubia as an East African civilisation, The Nok as a negroid civilisation it is when you get carried away and try to claim the Chinese, the Olmecs and that fucking Europeans were Albinos this is when we have to get you off the crazy boat!
greeny202a 2 months ago
@greeny202a Still going around black videos I see.
Bsmurfdizzle 2 months ago
@greeny202a
go to the comments on African history. you will be amaze that many whites don't believe in an African civilization.
Dramactica 3 weeks ago
@Dramactica Sure but that is because they are trying to link themselves to Egypt which was never a completely African civilization! Anyone who thinks Egypt was not very heavily influenced by the Mediterranean is a fool. Also the black Olmecs and Chinese nonsense makes them look primitive do you not think?
greeny202a 3 weeks ago
@greeny202a
You’re mistaken. Ancient Egypt was completely African in origin. Ancient Egypt had a matriarchal system with the same social organization with other parts of Africa. In contrast, there has never been any proof of the existence of a paleo-Mediterranean matriarchy supposedly exclusively white. In fact, the ancient Egyptians always mentioned that their roots came from Africa. Ironically, the ancient Egyptians are the one who heavily influenced the Mediterranean.
blackhaze21 3 weeks ago
@blackhaze21 BULLSHIT (A) the Egyptians say they came from the land of Punt and NOBODY knows where that is! Most real historians think it was in Southern Arabia! (B) Google "bradshawfoundation com/journey/" This is the official walkthrough of the single OOA theory and shows quite clearly the first settlers in North Africa after the Sahara began to retreat were Asians from the Levant! (D) Egypt was NEVER completely African in origins as we know by the older Ziggurats in Sumeria.
greeny202a 3 weeks ago
@greeny202a
Majority of historians concede that land of punt is in Africa. In fact, depicted on the bas-reliefs are traditional African animals and materials, which are absence in southern Arabia.(B) That is irrelevant, North Africa has never been the starting point of the ancient Egyptian civilization,and Africans inhabited North Africa before the formation of the Sahara desert.(C) Sumer, prior to 8th century, constructed mounds with sun dried bricks compared to Egypt’s pyramids.
blackhaze21 3 weeks ago
@blackhaze21 (A) To say the majority of historians accept Punt was in Africa is a complete fabrication (as you well know) in fact it is not proven that it actually existed at all! (B) ABSOLUTE NONSENSE the Sahara desert became completely inhabitable 90,000 years ago and wiped out all human life from Mali to the Levant and only became habitable again about 45,000 years ago when a group from Asia entered Egypt from the Levant,blacks only arrived in Egypt about 13,000 years ago! (cont)
greeny202a 3 weeks ago
@greeny202a
(B) As I said before, North Africa was inhabited by Africans before it was desert and that’s a fundamental issue. But let’s say, for argument sake, it’s true Asians populated North Africa it’s irrelevant because the ancient Egyptians trace their origin to the Nile valley, not North Africa.
blackhaze21 2 weeks ago
@greeny202a
(a)You’re being quite disingenuous.The general consensus among the majority of scholars is that the land of punt is in East Africa,but the location within East Africa is debatable.After all, the bas-reliefs show typical African animals and scenery that is foreign to southern Arabia.Not to mention,all of the archeological evidences that supports that fact,but you what people to believe there’s a genuine debate between the Africa origin and purported Asia origin of punt.
blackhaze21 2 weeks ago
@blackhaze21 (cont) and of course (C) It is irrelevant what materials were used in the Sumerian Ziggurats the fact is they were almost exactly the same design as the Egyptian and Nubian ones and nearly 1000 years older than both. Now considering we don't find Ziggurats of this type anywhere in Sub-Saharan Africa I think that is game over don't you?
greeny202a 3 weeks ago
@greeny202a
(C) I’m really taken aback by your ignorance and your fraudulent statements. You seem to be proponent of the long discredited dynastic race theory. As some people may know, no trace of man earlier than 4000 B.C exists in Sumer. By that date the Egyptians had their feet on the threshold of their history. Sumer was still building with sun-dried bricks made of clay that rain transformed into a mass of mud. Egypt's pyramids and temples are still palpable today.
blackhaze21 2 weeks ago
@greeny202a
First off, what are you talking about? I'm talking about your comments about West African kingdoms and many whites don't believe it. Second, I believe you have some propaganda against African descent by your comments I read throughout this video. You can debate but the word "primitive" is a racist word and you know Africa IS NOT PRIMITIVE. Shame on YOU!
Dramactica 3 weeks ago
@Dramactica Well if a group of people are trying to suggest Ancient Egypt was purely made up of Nilotics or West Africans from Mali sailed across the Atlantic ocean 5,000 years ago and created the Olmec civilization then the only word to use for those people is primitive! Don't confuse my anti-Afrocentric line here with racism! Colour is not the problem here lack of education is.
greeny202a 3 weeks ago