This video is completely fucking retarded. How much of an idiot does one have to be to see this event photographed from 30 different angles, a plane weighing 400,000 pounds doing 575mph encountering a big box of a building and exploding there live in thirty different ways??? The plane is doing almost 850/sec you would have to know the frame rate of the camera to do this calculation otherwise it is pointless and it proves ZERO!!!
@roquefortfiles there you are......i knew i would find bluecheesefiles again. wazzzzzz up. i agree with you, but you have to admit, this definately makes you think twice or you would not of watched it in the first place. the plane trajectories are all radicly different in all the videos. why is that? why does the plane look blue in some pics and white in others. why in one video does the place appear to go straight through the tower?
@classictoyspaper You first have to understand lenses. (I am a photographer). and you have to understand the myriad varying quality cameras that shot this. No two white balances are going to be the same. A pro camera is going to look radically different to a cell phone camera.. etc!! A telephoto lens will drastically compress the background and the planes descent will happen VERY quickly. Wide angle will make the plane look like it is not diving at all. And that is what we see.
@roquefortfiles true, i agree. but explain the different trajectories of the flight path. some videos have in coming in at a straight low line, some show it coming very high and shooting downward. and how exactly does a plain completely enter a building with little resistance? i have seen videos of crashes, i have never seen something like what we saw on 911. bottom line here is that not a GOD DAMN thing about 911 makes any fucking sense!
@classictoyspaper Different trajectories?! Dont think so!! Watch this video!! Incredibly well done. I think you will see there is no variance to its trajectory AT ALL!! It is simply our changing perspective to it.
watch?v=-K-WjsHa_2k&feature=related
LOL. Firstly VELOCITY has everything to do with the planes ability to go straight through the building. #2 the building is about 80% AIR. The outer wall and 60 feet of open flooring. Traveling at 540mph? U kidding me? No problem
NO IT ISNT!! if a slow moving object hits a solid object at a slow but steady speed, it will REMAIN AT THE SAME SPEED FOR ONE FULL OBJECT LENGTH! and the skyscraper was not much bigger than an airliner?
This has been flagged as spam show
craig “killtown” lazo
is getting spiney and fishy 2 do his dirty work nao
at facebook and other places online
wont work but its lulz to watch :)
k616e6f6e 1 month ago
This vid makes sense
kenevkiradka 2 months ago
This video is completely fucking retarded. How much of an idiot does one have to be to see this event photographed from 30 different angles, a plane weighing 400,000 pounds doing 575mph encountering a big box of a building and exploding there live in thirty different ways??? The plane is doing almost 850/sec you would have to know the frame rate of the camera to do this calculation otherwise it is pointless and it proves ZERO!!!
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles there you are......i knew i would find bluecheesefiles again. wazzzzzz up. i agree with you, but you have to admit, this definately makes you think twice or you would not of watched it in the first place. the plane trajectories are all radicly different in all the videos. why is that? why does the plane look blue in some pics and white in others. why in one video does the place appear to go straight through the tower?
classictoyspaper 1 year ago
@classictoyspaper You first have to understand lenses. (I am a photographer). and you have to understand the myriad varying quality cameras that shot this. No two white balances are going to be the same. A pro camera is going to look radically different to a cell phone camera.. etc!! A telephoto lens will drastically compress the background and the planes descent will happen VERY quickly. Wide angle will make the plane look like it is not diving at all. And that is what we see.
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles true, i agree. but explain the different trajectories of the flight path. some videos have in coming in at a straight low line, some show it coming very high and shooting downward. and how exactly does a plain completely enter a building with little resistance? i have seen videos of crashes, i have never seen something like what we saw on 911. bottom line here is that not a GOD DAMN thing about 911 makes any fucking sense!
classictoyspaper 1 year ago
@classictoyspaper Different trajectories?! Dont think so!! Watch this video!! Incredibly well done. I think you will see there is no variance to its trajectory AT ALL!! It is simply our changing perspective to it.
watch?v=-K-WjsHa_2k&feature=related
LOL. Firstly VELOCITY has everything to do with the planes ability to go straight through the building. #2 the building is about 80% AIR. The outer wall and 60 feet of open flooring. Traveling at 540mph? U kidding me? No problem
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
the negativ acceleration is not as big as we could see it. may be 10.99 frame...
atyy123 2 years ago
interesting vid
expose the 9/11 fraud
SneakySmith1 2 years ago
NO IT ISNT!! if a slow moving object hits a solid object at a slow but steady speed, it will REMAIN AT THE SAME SPEED FOR ONE FULL OBJECT LENGTH! and the skyscraper was not much bigger than an airliner?
Ah1294 2 years ago
When you count the frames, have you compared this with other crashes.
Denierbud11 2 years ago
Excellent..
Yeltsonsghost911 3 years ago