Added: 4 years ago
From: DaffyBeatle
Views: 273,155
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (356)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • sounds like they should have kept working on it ?

  • Who could put a gun to that beautiful back?

  • good song - macca should nick it

  • WTF??????????

  • Dude I don't care about the song, I care about the photographs! O.K., Paul has his beard shaved but John hasn't grown his beard yet and George hasn't shaved his mustache yet. so it's post "Get Back" sessions but pre-"Abbey Road" sessions. So this must be them rehearsing "I Want You" maybe? This is probably Feb. of 1969 I'm guessing?

  • its not the beatles but hang on its a good song and the melody is fantastic reminds me of free as a bird why dont you record it its great and no im not making fun of it needs more lyrics and a decent end and you got a hit my friend as good as anything badfinger did sounds like them and pete ham well done me mate

  • Nazz?

  • cheese and onions .

  • its definitely the beatles at abby road, think  its george martin on lead vocals with mal evans backing him.....

  • What's the point?

  • 162 likes? Some idiots like everything. Hey. give it to Mikey. This is a piece of crap.

  • Well known fake. Can't believe anyone would think this sounds like the Beatles.

  • You stupid cunt. This is awful. If this is the best you can play then you ought to pack up.

  • Even though this isn't the Beatles, this is a band called Mortimer. The confusion arose when this song was the B-side to "Two of Us", covered by Mortimer. That version was released before the Beatles, and since Mortimer was an Apple band, the Beatles let them have it. People got confused and thought this was an unreleased Beatles song from 1969, and it began appearing on bootlegs. So instead of calling this fake, we should enjoy this great song by Mortimer.

  • To the Beatle Basher below, There has never been or will be another Fab Four. The world was ready for a new beat and the Beatles were there. No other group wooed the hearts of millions of american girls like the Beatles. Shea Stadium, Ed Sullivan the list goes on and on. Most all their early songs were love songs. I,m 57 Beatles were in my older sisters hearts. So make fun of them if it makes you feel good. Three favorites off White Album, Why Don't We Do It In The Road,,,I Will,,, Julia...dan

  • in ihate youtube grammer correcters AND i love the sqwiggly red lines under all my damn words!!!

  • Bad qualitiy but very good song!!!

  • Come on, the beatles did worst shit... (Why dont we do it in the road rings a bell?)just because YOU KNOW its fake, otherwiseee " OHH THE BEATLES MASTER PIECE WHAT A SHAME IT DIDNT CAME OUT"

    Dont take me wrong, I love them. But let's be quite smarter.

  • @whoispink the beatles did worse* otherwise* but lets be more smart* check your grammar brah

  • @diperrimax Beatles. Capitalized. Why Don't We Do It In the Road. Capitalized. "ring a bell", not "rings a bell" in this particular question. Period after quotation mark after "bell". Just. Capitalized. YOU KNOW should be lower-case and underscored if emphasis is to be brought to the word. Next sentence should be written this way; "Oh, the Beatles' masterpiece, what a shame it didn't come [not came] out." "more smart" or, simply, "smarter." If you're going to make corrections, do all.

  • @JeffersonDinedAlone My bad ahaha i'm obviously in the presence of an English teacher.

  • @diperrimax Nah, I'm not an English teacher. I just have a fairly decent comprehension of the language.

  • @whoispink why dont we do it on the road's not bad

  • @whoispink Why don't we do it in the road is great. I still love it 40 years later and I can't say that about many songs.

  • It is a really good song. Who is it>>??

  • its a really good song, sure it's not the beatles but it's a GREAT SONG

  • NOT EVEN CLOSE !!

  • no one wants your shitty music.

  • Absolutely a FAKE.

    You just wasted 30 seconds of my life.

  • Glad to hear it's a fake. I was about to start beating myself up for thinking that a Beatles song wasn't very good (see - I can't even bring myself to say it sucks) lol.

  • holy shit he beginning is like stairway to heaven

  • My farts sound better than this

  • Don't waste people's time. You're not the Beatles and you never will. Make your own mark in history. You are fakes. Let people know you are doing a COVER.

  • @LookingRU

    Um, who are you talking to? This was recorded by some unknown group back in the 70s. Doubtful the video poster was in the band.

  • It's from Badfinger....

  • @John37816

    Well, lessee. It doesn't sound like Pete Ham, Tom Evans, or Joey Molland. So, then you must be saying it's Mike Gibbins, the Badfinger drummer who rarely sang? Or are you just smart enough to know its not The Beatles so you jump to the NEXT reckless conclusion? If we debunk the Badfinger theory, does it suddenly become a Rutles outtake for you?

  • @reverendflash No. I put "Oh I Need You" and I had ALOT of results from other artists. But the most were Badfinger. I don't even know Badfinger, althoguh, they look kinda cool...

  • Imitation..No Ringo in drums.

  • This is actually a really good song... even though its not the beatles... who is it actually? :L

  • this isn't funny, if it was it'd be okay. however, you've used the beatles, a fucking legendary band's name...

    maybe do this to a some other piss band.

    not beatles.

    even if you did do it to a shite band, this stillllll wouldn't be funny.

    at all..

  • Using The Beatles' name like this should be illegal. You'd ought to be ashamed of yourself.

  • This is not the Beatles.......get real

  • wtf is wrong with 260 people im crying

  • The one how thought there was a Beatle in this is the most UNMUSICALEST person ever ;)

  • DAFFYBEATLE SUCKS!"

  • DAFFYBEATLE,..... (The complete scum of a bi-ped that uploaded this.) Simply defiles the Beatles with this misrepresented posting.. DAFFY is the only correct and true aspect of the entire thing. And does indeed fit as the first portion of his Youtube ID. If you agree, respond a bunch of times like this: "DAFFYBEATLE SUCKS!" Not exactly grammatically creative,... But we are talking about an idiot. Right? ;D I'll be first. ;)

  • You suck - you are misrepresenting the work of both the artists who recorded this work and the moral rights of The Beatles to have the work of others passed off as their own. youtube should ban such videos for misrepresentation in both the title and the use of copyrighted photos without permission

  • This sucks, and it's not the Beatles. It doesn't even sound like any of them. Not even Ringo. I hate when people (I use the term loosely) do this stupid kind of thing.

  • @BradfordandLasso This has been included on Beatles bootlegs, so therefore is a part of Beatles history. This was a tape from a band that recorded for Apple and thus would have been sneaked out by someone at apple, who then thought it was the Beatles. It happens. If it wasn't for sneaking out tapes, then we'd have no bootlegs, and then their would have never been a demand for the anthology series.

  • @FabFM By your answer I can see that you are well aware you are deceiving people. It cannot be defended. The tiltle and the pictures prove that you are proporting it to be a Beatles song. Not nice.

  • @BradfordandLasso I didn't post this video!! I just pointed out a FACT that this recording has appeared on Beatles bootlegs for decades! Comprehend now?

  • @FabFM ooh. underwear on too tight?

  • @BradfordandLasso No, you just didn't have your thinking cap on, and still don't.

  • Oh, I am soo flagging this for misleading text

  • This isn't Paul. What's sad is that that this vid has been viewed over 200,000 times by using The Beatles name.

  • bs

  • I don't know if it's Paul or not, but if it isn't it's a good imitator;D

  • This was a proved outFake

  • "The very idea that even a handful of people would hear this and even remotely suspect that it was a BEATLE, sounded like a BEATLE, was played, written, and recorded by all or any one BEATLE or was even produced by a BEATLE or BEATLE engineer/producer is precisely why there have been so many god-awful records and bands that actually got record deals and radio airplay when they should have never been let out the woodshed!!

    This is absolutely pathetic!

    A, "BaND oN The DuNG," recording

    -rOrange

  • Not only is this not the beatles, but the sound quality is not good.

  • it's still pretty good, just not the beatles it's still pretty friggen good

  • shite

  • THIS IS NOT JOHN, PAUL, GEORGE OR RINGO. NOT THE BEATLES!!!!!!!!

  • This is N O T the Beatles!

  • This was proved to be a fake.

  • #1.20 morrinson haircut ;P

  • 1) Hold your breath.

    2) Copy all of these steps.

    3) Go to two other video.

    4) Paste it in the comments.

    If you can do all of this without breathing you're a good pot smoke

    wilson1516 hace 30 minutos

  • @SonyxC1 Everyone can do that.

  • Lennon didn't start writing songs like this till he left the beatles.

  • Why do you idiots waste people's time drawing us to your shitty music by using the names of successful artists worth listening to? Wanker.

  • @SlappyFrankenstein it's been a while since hearing your closer used so aptly. touche!

  • @SlappyFrankenstein waiit aroue you talkinga aboutkjust beeeber?!??

  • @SlappyFrankenstein This song was available in a lot of beatles bootlegs in the 80s... it's a fake, but for some time, people really believed it was them. No need to be angry, it's just a honest mistake.

  • I think that I have the demo, it came with the Beatles artifacts, I think

  • Eternal shame on you DaffyBeatle......

  • .....

  • Anyone knows this isn't Ringo as well

  • everyone here is dumb, this is the beatles and paul singing... you guys can't hear right

  • Yes i know it`s Paul singing. That`s a fact.

    Regards Ron

  • @motivemotley How do you know this? Doesn't sound like Paul to me!

  • @motivemotley

    If that's a 'fact', then you knowing nothing about The Beatles is a 'superfact'.

  • Comment removed

  • @motivemotley I sound more like Paul than this guy. Fact. Google me and listen for yourself.

  • who would think this is the Beatles singing, gawd?

  • This is absolutely for a fact not The Beatles.

  • wt hell this is not the beatles ..this band is the Ruttles mtdck

  • It´s wondeful! i love beatles ♥

    PS. : please have a look on my videos too and leave a comment

  • @singbird95 this aren't the beatles ;)

  • Haha... Worse than the Ruttles..

  • i hate paul so much with long hair it makes him look like a girl

  • то что нравится здесь - видеоряд и все.

  • I like it - it's very McCartneyesque/Badfingeresque

  • Why do people do this??? Soooooo stupid and soooooo much a waste of time!

  • Ringo does not do rolls that way. Not the Beatles.

  • YOU HAVE JUST BEEN FLAGGED FOR MISLEADING TEXT!!!!

  • fantastic fake!!

  • Great- he best wishes from Germany !

  • why post fake junk bro...

  • NOT Badfinger!!!!

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • NO!

  • FAKE.

  • 1:15 Oh, yeah . . . . .

  • It sounds like an early Badfinger demo. Vocal could be Pete Ham?

  • @WilburyVision I can see why you thought of that.......

  • NOPE ... I agree ... not them!!

  • sound a lot like ringo o.o

  • @Flamos013

    WHA'?? Sounds *Nothing* like Ringo. He had/ has a Very noticeably deeper voice. At this stage, everyone knows it isn't the Beatles, & I'd agree it sounds closer to early Badfinger. Could be an Apple reject from some unknown too.

  • The beatles would never do anythign this horrible... Do not believe this is the beatles people!

  • well it's sounds closest to mccartney... but even that is a stretch. Not the beatles. I can tell just by the drumming. But the voice is a dead giveaway.

  • Its not beatles...Its a fake and shit)))

  • haha I thought it was real sounds allmost like Paul

  • This is a real beatles song that went unfinished. too bad

  • were did you get this song its a dang good song

  • wow gimme a break.....not even close mango.

  • this is what a shit sounds like...

  • It's good music, and well sung by someone who sounds a lot like Paul. Might be a wannabe, but don't we all? If it was an Abbey Road outtake it would be tape, not disc.

  • So this is what hell sounds like. Awful.

  • sound amazing

  • que mierda!!!! esta mas que claro que NO son The Beatles

  • I actually rather like this does anybody know how I could get an MP3?

  • not the Beatles. Beatle wanna be's..yes, but not the real song.

  • If it was that finished, they never would have left a vocal that out of tune on it, c'mon

  • sounds like Wings...this stinks regardless

  • @Atomicflash500 to be honest, Wings had some great hits. And they sounded great. Don't look down on that group.

  • IS REAL MAN, DON BE ASSHOLE

  • Why do people think putting up fake demos is cool???

  • That's Badfinger isn't it?

  • I believe this is The Beatles, they could of brought someone in to sing with them.

  • Yeah, that's not The Beatles.

  • I actually don't thinks its all to bad. May not be real, but doesn't sound bad.

  • definitely a fake, McCartney never sang that flat

  • Sounds like a Whiter Shade of Pale in that one part.

  • "Oh, I Need You" (also identified as "Oh, I Want You"). This song was purported to have been recorded during early sessions for Abbey Road. The artist has not been determined with certainty, but it is often attributed to the band Mortimer, who signed with Apple Records in 1968.

  • @RapEye: This first appeared on the "Rough Notes" bootleg in the 70s. It's definitely Mike McGear. This is probably an out-take from his "Woman" album.

  • Fake. And a very poor one.

  • Ringo Rocks!! All I gotta say., He's the comic releif of the Beatles,

  • Comment removed

  • a great musician isn't defined by technique. there are a lot of people who are great at their instrument, but there's no feeling and no uniqueness. ringo is a great drummer!

  • dear lucyinthesky34,

    there is great musical understanding in what you say, many thanks Berh

  • Nice try.

  • this is indeed Paul at lead along with the other beatles, I asked a reliable source who happens to be Winston. Many of u should know of him, him being 1 of the most popular beatle fans on the net

  • @reneperezz Who the fuck is this Winston? Maybe he is a big Beatles fan but in this case he's defenitely wrong!

  • @annabelvandasselaer He was close to the Beatles back in the day.

  • Not the BEATLES !

  • "obviously" that's not beatles!

  • I need the BeaTles

  • Dit is Badfinger!!!

  • ringo is an insane drummer, you have no idea what your talking about. listen to golden slumbers beotch

  • @shaaazaam

    ha ha

    this made me laugh

    golden slumbers IS great

    .........apart from the drumming

    feuker

  • Ringo is a super amazing drummer, every expert would cónfirm that, what you are talking you stupid child..

  • @berherbi

    the drumming expert scholars of the vatican?

    i play the drums stupid child

    i could list amazing drummers but ringo isnt on the list - he plays the hit-hat like a beginner

  • @pzolsky ,

    Oh dear , it is worse than I thought. of course there are million drummers better technically. But one day you will know that simplicity, ability to serve a song, sometimes with a few hi hat hits can be genius. Ringo was such a genius: do you know what: Phil Collins and , a great drummer said, most so called genius drummers would never have been able to come up with Ringos input. Listen to "in my life" Drive my car A day in the life,.... ,. berher

  • no, your wrong.

  • ha ha good arguement

    the drummer sounds like B. J. Wilson

    you probably dont know who that is even

    if you maintain the drumming is better on the beatles version of the song he also played on a version of, which i'm sure you will, then you and anyone else who disagrees is proudly anouncing to youtube you know f@ck all about drumming, or music even

  • yes, the drummer for procol harum...

    he's a great drummer...

    but i still think ringo is awesome

  • @pzolsky He was a Beatle. How about you?

  • this has to be the dumbest reply i've ever received on youtube

    b j wilson was technically a better drummer than ringo

    what's being in the beatles go to do with anything

  • @pzolsky Ringo was part of the greatest band of all time. There are lots of better drummers. He was the one who was chosen. I see other people have made the same reference to the it does not matter who is better idea. Charisma was a big part back then also.

  • i didnt raise the issue

    i just made a tongue in cheek remark about the drumming on this vid being too good to be ringo, ie not the beatles.

    i've just been sticking to that opinion.

    seeing as this isnt the beatles, and daring to vaguely critisise any genuine beatles vid results in being shot down in flames, i decided to waste time by replying to all the pointless replies i got defending ringo

  • @pzolsky But if only you let us know who the fuck is this B.J.Wilson......!

  • @annabelvandasselaer

    this must be what the internet was like before google

  • @shaaazaam its the end but youre in the right

  • i just saw this reply

    the drum solo bit?

    oh yeah

    still not convinced sorry

  • NOT THE BEATLES!

  • @robertogiammanco

    .......and? It clearly says this in the description.

  • Not the Beatles, and it sucks ass

  • This song was given for (abbey road), it(he,she) was going to be after i want you in the original album, I would like that they had put it, but good like that it(he,she) was, it is one of the songs that I like

  • Sounds more like Badfinger.

  • I liked it. It sounded like Mary Banilow.

  • Are Ringo drinking coffe or the?

  • imagine it secretly wasn't fake and all you dicks that have to leave comments about how it isn't real even though it says so in the info all killed yourselves?!

  • Can you people complaining that's fake please read the description? The poster knows. Anyone who reads the description knows.

  • first place: if they are the beatles, the singer would be John, I D I O T S (...paul.. ¬¬)

    Second place: is my dick singing

  • sounds like paul on crack

  • No Beatles performed in the production of this song. This is really bottom of the barrel stuff. I've heard bad unreleased Beatles material and it's much better than this. The chord progression isn't even as sophisticated has Ringo's stuff, much less John, Paul, or George.

    Please relabel "Outfake". In fact, just take the word "Beatles" off altogether.

  • fake as hell, not the Beatles