@rilox10001 Obviously the thin size. More viewing area because its sticks out from the wall less... plus it looks better to most people. It will also be lighter.
i have never had a flat screen tv that u put on the wall, so does hanging it on the wall expose the power cord because i wouldnt want to mount to wall so i can see power cord running down wall to power outlet
im sorry but i just don't see the necessity in a thinner television :/ it would be good for market im sure a lot of people would waste their money on it but there isn't much point to it really is there? except for if your that concerned about it sticking too far out of your wall.
Why are they wasting time on this? Plasma is OLD technology. Screen burn is a major issue for plasmas, the lifespan of these TVs are short. And who wants it thinner as well, TVs nowadays are thin in the first place, and light. They should be concetrating on better image quality, not this plasma rubbish
the picture on a plasma tv is way better than LCD, the colours are more natural.. i use my plasma with the PS3 and have had no problems with screen burn, even after playing 4-5 hours, it´s only cheap crappy plasmas that that problem..
Yep totally true.... Why pay $150+ more for a "SUPER THIN" T.V.. Besides people need to get out of the house and stop watching tv. WASTE OF MONEY EVERYBODY!
People buy because it saves space and doesn't weigh too much. Weight could be a big problem with people who want to mount TVs on their walls but can't because its either a dry wall or a weak/hollow surface. I am pretty sure mounting this TV even on a dry wall wouldn't be an issue.
keep on pressing 6 it sound like he is having a orgasim
SilyBands 6 months ago
lol and this is in 2009, imagine what they will ome witht his year haha xD
chickensandw1tch 6 months ago
Stupid Commercials
TheCrysisTwo 7 months ago
press 6 for orgasm lol!
iwishicouldbejesus21 7 months ago
I wonder how it would be like if someone just touch it...will it break?
LightenElf 7 months ago
@kilox10001 Takes up less space in an 10000 km2 house :P
heisenfeis 9 months ago
@rilox10001 Obviously the thin size. More viewing area because its sticks out from the wall less... plus it looks better to most people. It will also be lighter.
Shadow01505 10 months ago
@roggelmagic Buy plugging them in via compatible video cables.
Shadow01505 10 months ago
haha the usb ports and stuff will go through the tv xD
eXoTicZzHD 11 months ago
I don't get why being thinner is better? Why don't they make it thick, but pack more tech into it!
mecon2 1 year ago 2
i have never had a flat screen tv that u put on the wall, so does hanging it on the wall expose the power cord because i wouldnt want to mount to wall so i can see power cord running down wall to power outlet
cris178Zune 1 year ago
wow less than 1 cm
rax7 1 year ago 2
8.8mm is like macbook air thin... thats mental! but people say plasmas have a good black level....
i have yet to see one where black looks black, to me its just gray! im sure its down to how the diodes reflect light.
reminds me of the story 'the emperors new clothes!
gobacktorussia 2 years ago
@gobacktorussia Check out an LED LCD. They actually turn off the back light when it is supposed to be black, so no more grays.
TheGuyInUrCloset 1 year ago
I wonder, how easy it gets broken...
Paskakasane 2 years ago 5
-taps it-
-TV blows up-
Plasmas FTL.
Xjkjk3264X 2 years ago 4
That's all nice and stuff, but HOW THE HELL AM I GOING TO CONNECT DVD PLAYERS, PLAYSTATIONS AND ALL THAT STUFF TO IT!!
roggelmagic 2 years ago 18
I believe there is a wireless box that you connect all your stuff to
s1acker69 2 years ago 3
@roggelmagic hey dude there is a wireless box where you connect everything to
TheTherobotboy 2 years ago
im sorry but i just don't see the necessity in a thinner television :/ it would be good for market im sure a lot of people would waste their money on it but there isn't much point to it really is there? except for if your that concerned about it sticking too far out of your wall.
soofay 2 years ago 3
oh wow, damn, i want an ultra thin tv like this, damn, will it be HDTV?
yes, well, i hope it don't cost expensive more than $3000.
Frienever 3 years ago
I like how they say thin is in but thier is a fat guy taking pictures of the thing
RedSteelFilms 3 years ago
Hahaha, best comment on a video about CES 2009 or tvs. Bravo, bravo.
SZ3K3R 3 years ago
Well plasmas are good. But of course, don't get a plasma unless it's like at least a 42", Otherwise, LCD's are good for the smaller form factors.
elfslay 3 years ago
Why are they wasting time on this? Plasma is OLD technology. Screen burn is a major issue for plasmas, the lifespan of these TVs are short. And who wants it thinner as well, TVs nowadays are thin in the first place, and light. They should be concetrating on better image quality, not this plasma rubbish
FireForFreezing 3 years ago
the picture on a plasma tv is way better than LCD, the colours are more natural.. i use my plasma with the PS3 and have had no problems with screen burn, even after playing 4-5 hours, it´s only cheap crappy plasmas that that problem..
diodrengen2630 3 years ago 2
Thats cool to know. I sorta ignored plasma when LCD became bigger
FireForFreezing 3 years ago
they should be concentrating more on OLED tv's more, because thats the future.
i've been waiting for a tv to come out for ages now.
1000000:1 contrast ratios
frame rate in the micro range (x10-6)
true1080p
bendable screen
puncturable screen and would still work!
milimeters thick
it looks fucking sweet
geetarwanabe 2 years ago 3
OLED is still 100x better, funny how they still try to sell plasmas.. when they should be mass producing OLED by now.
LoudNinja1 3 years ago
dammmmmmmmmmmmmmmnnn!!!!!!!!!!!!
AllStarDeal79 3 years ago 2
fuck!
thats thin :o
skillzombie6 3 years ago
whatever, that thing looks sweet. It would be very helpful to have one that thin and light.
kentatm 3 years ago 2
I thought Plasma technology was being phased out and LCD was the way to go?
vfrederic 3 years ago
nope if you jump on to cnet and check out who won the best tv of ces 2009 you'll see that panasonic took the award for that (yes it was a plamsa)
ebaymagot 3 years ago
like 15 of those thick equal MY TV!!!
thecoolkid657 3 years ago
who givs a flying fuc if its fin
maxisme21 3 years ago
Yep totally true.... Why pay $150+ more for a "SUPER THIN" T.V.. Besides people need to get out of the house and stop watching tv. WASTE OF MONEY EVERYBODY!
LIVENever 3 years ago
fuckin bullshit
by a is about the quality not about thin or whatever
i bet the quality is not better than the tv´ of today
they just want to make money theye dont care ybout the costumer (sry 4 mi english)
westweed104 3 years ago
why would we want to buy a tv coz it very thin thats no worth the cost just buy a hd tv for god sake
Benny2503 3 years ago
People buy because it saves space and doesn't weigh too much. Weight could be a big problem with people who want to mount TVs on their walls but can't because its either a dry wall or a weak/hollow surface. I am pretty sure mounting this TV even on a dry wall wouldn't be an issue.
tapanpatel88 3 years ago
looks amazing so what they want us to pay a 1000 quid cos its thiner? i have a samsung hd tv and thats real thin and displayus full 1080p
TheRealBlueBoNe 3 years ago
Looks fragile.
TheProphaze 3 years ago 3
man, thats....gunna be cool to have...wonder if i can still through my ball at it?
heroic52 3 years ago
Haha...those were the days.
dustygobatron 3 years ago
holy crap!!!
Grimreaper648 3 years ago
Coo,l
dothack200 3 years ago
It's N-sync!
bitchslapper12 3 years ago
looks costly
4DUMBASSES 3 years ago 3
EEEEEEEEEEW
Slahbarat 3 years ago
kool
SuperMariofan28 3 years ago
Zzzzzzzzzzz....
RiseOfAxle 3 years ago
8.8mm thick? wow wt.f that's really thin
ipwnyomoma 3 years ago 9
lol kool :)
FilmMadness 3 years ago