Added: 3 years ago
From: IGNentertainment
Views: 18,553
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (58)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • keep on pressing 6 it sound like he is having a orgasim

  • lol and this is in 2009, imagine what they will ome witht his year haha xD

  • Stupid Commercials

  • press 6 for orgasm lol!

  • I wonder how it would be like if someone just touch it...will it break?

  • @kilox10001 Takes up less space in an 10000 km2 house :P

  • @rilox10001 Obviously the thin size. More viewing area because its sticks out from the wall less... plus it looks better to most people. It will also be lighter.

  • @roggelmagic Buy plugging them in via compatible video cables.

  • haha the usb ports and stuff will go through the tv xD

  • I don't get why being thinner is better? Why don't they make it thick, but pack more tech into it!

  • i have never had a flat screen tv that u put on the wall, so does hanging it on the wall expose the power cord because i wouldnt want to mount to wall so i can see power cord running down wall to power outlet

  • wow less than 1 cm

  • 8.8mm is like macbook air thin... thats mental! but people say plasmas have a good black level....

    i have yet to see one where black looks black, to me its just gray! im sure its down to how the diodes reflect light.

    reminds me of the story 'the emperors new clothes!

  • @gobacktorussia Check out an LED LCD. They actually turn off the back light when it is supposed to be black, so no more grays.

  • I wonder, how easy it gets broken...

  • -taps it-

    -TV blows up-

    Plasmas FTL.

  • That's all nice and stuff, but HOW THE HELL AM I GOING TO CONNECT DVD PLAYERS, PLAYSTATIONS AND ALL THAT STUFF TO IT!!

  • I believe there is a wireless box that you connect all your stuff to

  • @roggelmagic hey dude there is a wireless box where you connect everything to

  • im sorry but i just don't see the necessity in a thinner television :/ it would be good for market im sure a lot of people would waste their money on it but there isn't much point to it really is there? except for if your that concerned about it sticking too far out of your wall.

  • oh wow, damn, i want an ultra thin tv like this, damn, will it be HDTV?

    yes, well, i hope it don't cost expensive more than $3000.

  • I like how they say thin is in but thier is a fat guy taking pictures of the thing

  • Hahaha, best comment on a video about CES 2009 or tvs. Bravo, bravo.

  • Well plasmas are good. But of course, don't get a plasma unless it's like at least a 42", Otherwise, LCD's are good for the smaller form factors.

  • Why are they wasting time on this? Plasma is OLD technology. Screen burn is a major issue for plasmas, the lifespan of these TVs are short. And who wants it thinner as well, TVs nowadays are thin in the first place, and light. They should be concetrating on better image quality, not this plasma rubbish

  • the picture on a plasma tv is way better than LCD, the colours are more natural.. i use my plasma with the PS3 and have had no problems with screen burn, even after playing 4-5 hours, it´s only cheap crappy plasmas that that problem..

  • Thats cool to know. I sorta ignored plasma when LCD became bigger

  • they should be concentrating more on OLED tv's more, because thats the future.

    i've been waiting for a tv to come out for ages now.

    1000000:1 contrast ratios

    frame rate in the micro range (x10-6)

    true1080p

    bendable screen

    puncturable screen and would still work!

    milimeters thick

    it looks fucking sweet

  • OLED is still 100x better, funny how they still try to sell plasmas.. when they should be mass producing OLED by now.

  • dammmmmmmmmmmmmmmnnn!!!!!!!!!!­!!

  • fuck!

    thats thin :o

  • whatever, that thing looks sweet. It would be very helpful to have one that thin and light.

  • I thought Plasma technology was being phased out and LCD was the way to go?

  • nope if you jump on to cnet and check out who won the best tv of ces 2009 you'll see that panasonic took the award for that (yes it was a plamsa)

  • like 15 of those thick equal MY TV!!!

  • who givs a flying fuc if its fin

  • Yep totally true.... Why pay $150+ more for a "SUPER THIN" T.V.. Besides people need to get out of the house and stop watching tv. WASTE OF MONEY EVERYBODY!

  • fuckin bullshit

    by a is about the quality not about thin or whatever

    i bet the quality is not better than the tv´ of today

    they just want to make money theye dont care ybout the costumer (sry 4 mi english)

  • why would we want to buy a tv coz it very thin thats no worth the cost just buy a hd tv for god sake

  • People buy because it saves space and doesn't weigh too much. Weight could be a big problem with people who want to mount TVs on their walls but can't because its either a dry wall or a weak/hollow surface. I am pretty sure mounting this TV even on a dry wall wouldn't be an issue.

  • looks amazing so what they want us to pay a 1000 quid cos its thiner? i have a samsung hd tv and thats real thin and displayus full 1080p

  • Looks fragile.

  • man, thats....gunna be cool to have...wonder if i can still through my ball at it?

  • Haha...those were the days.

  • holy crap!!!

  • Coo,l

  • It's N-sync!

  • looks costly

  • EEEEEEEEEEW

  • kool

  • Zzzzzzzzzzz....

  • 8.8mm thick? wow wt.f that's really thin

  • lol kool :)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more