Added: 3 months ago
From: xxRagingAmishxx
Views: 7,462
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (393)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • I can understand needing practice to be good at piloting vehicles, but how can I get any practice if every time I get in a vehicle, I get instantly blown up by someone who has better vehicle abilities? Seriously, I try flying a jet and get locked on the second I take off, and don't have any flares to defend myself with. It's basically impossible to get any better at it, because I'm always up against people with better stuff than me. That's probably my biggest complaint.

  • I never have connection problems

  • This game is amazing 9.5 out of 10

  • The only way Bf3 and other battlefield games are fun is if you are good at them which comes in practice. I was a cod player first but I started to play bfbc2. Yes I sucked as any other cod player would, but over time I learned how to move around the maps and be successful.

  • It's not that it is hard to control vehicles, it's that you suck with them. Also the large maps are the whole point. Bf3 is not supposed to be small action packed gameplay. That's what cod is for. Battlefield games are played for a different reason. NOT for the most kills you can get. The only way bf

  • Battlefield has never had a good campaign. So has cod.

  • So, just because you guys like a game, Everyone else must like too?

    I AGREE With him in every complain, the storyline is boring, and for today standards, a 6 hours campaing is... averege. And, like Counter Strike, NO ONE can be a begginer on MP.

    But, the multiplayer is quite good, and the graphics godly.

  • also i play on pc and bf3 banned me for no reason and got no email telling me why

  • bf3 fanboys are the worst i have ever seen with ps3 fanboys being the 2nd worst but bf3 fanboys on ps3 make me so pissed

  • Your pretty harsh for a reviewer. I would think a bit even though I dont have the game but played bf2 I wouldn't care about map size I play mw3 and I agree it is faster paced but the maps and the multiplayer are full of possibilities and if I were you next time give it a 8.5 or the bf fanboys will be an ass to you.

  • You compared CoD and BF way too much, they're different games, start treating them as such. But in all fairness, most of your subscribers are CoD fanboys, so refering to Cod a few times I can understand. But just try to make it more clear in the future, they are completely different games.

  • BF3 is much better than MW3.... But that's not saying much because it still sucks monkey fuck and pukes diarreha up your fucking asshole

  • You are such a retard *facepalm* Can't you just review this game without mentioning COD? I mean they are completely different games. COD= Arcade Shooter Battlefield 3= War Simulator. THERE IS NOTHING TO COMPARE SO SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT COD AND MAKE A DECENT REVIEW! Thank you :D

  • I very much dislike the BF3 menu design. Not being able to customize loadouts or quit in-between matches is a pain. Also M16 & M4, as a starting gun, isnt newbie friendly. I had a hard time taking down opponents. Once I unlocked M416 & Famas, things went a lot better.

    Otherwise, the rest of the game is a blast. Maps r kinda big but thats because console can only hold 12 v 12 unlike PC.

  • i want a cod with the frostbite engine. awesome game with awesome graphics!

  • ah i love reading the bf fanboys vs the cod fanboys... possibly more entertaining than this video

  • Falls short on gameplay?? Wow.... you sound like any other CoD fanboy.

  • Battlefield 2 was and is the best battlefield game

  • And cod has never copied shit the took a couple of things from halo and other games like theater mode they got that from halo and also cod has a shit campaign and the exact same gameplay every single game

  • Amish, you can leave a match after it has ended, pc trololo

  • i find more campers in BF3 than blops support is one man army with out losing your secondary

  • Amish, I think you are making this "connection" issue to much of a bit thing. You can connect fine. But at around 30 min or so of playing continuously on the same map, you lose connection. But by that time, you have gotten all the stuff you need. Donor doesn't matter as long as you have gotten what you need

  • BF3 console is flawed even in multiplayer. Most people comment on three things when saying it is a great game. 1, amazing graphics, 2. refined realistic gameplay 3. something new vs cod. All three things are right but unfortunately people are missing it's just harder to have fun on it. Servers are no longer full, and without gaming buddies you struggle to get decent squads working. This is essential for this game to be fun to play. I was a massive PC bf2 fan and 64 player servers work, 24 don't

  • Comment removed

  • Amish in this review is stupid fucked up cod fanboy...

  • How uninformed can console and/or CoD fanboys get? CoD didn't invent 2 player co-op, "middle eastern nation with nukes" settings, and Unlockable gear was INVENTED IN BF2! Not CoD4! Perks were first used in BF2142 under a different name.You didn't review the best version of BF3 also, jets and choppers control better on PC via joystick, and maps don't feel so big and barren because of 64 players. The campaign in both MW3 and BF3 were shoddy, so neither can be good. Such an ignorant fanboy.

  • Black ops did not invent "interrogation flashbacks" plots (Remember "Black" on Xbox 1). CoD4 did not invent the "middle eastern country with nukes" plotline. Stat tracking and unlocks WERE INVENTED BY Battlefield 2 buddy! "Perks" were first used in Battlefield 2142 under a different name. The vehicle handling isn't simple arcade bullshit, sorry you can't take realism CoD-boy. Maps seem to big because your not on PC and 64players on PC> 24 players. You are a uninformed CoD fanboy.

  • oh campaign in most fps are based on opinion

  • why is everyone mad

    

  • it only takes me a few seconds to connect to a good server...way better than having a guy go flawless on MW3 because he has host advantage or a glitch switch...one hit knife is gay...and the same overpowerd guns...CAMPERS... I used to be a CoD fanboy and trashed BFBC2 for nothing at all... played BF3 loved it ...played MW3 was fun for a couple of days then sold it to get skyrim... TOTALLY WORTH IT... Co-Op is tons of fun

  • If u reviewed mw3, I would see fanboy remarks now wouldn't I..." O mw3 has amazing fast paced action and great guns" fucking annoying ass campers and overpowered primary and secondaries to me....don't get me wrong...im no bf fanboy...bf3 is my first bf game that I actually played

  • Well amish...ur a cod fanboy

  • BF3 fanboys. Of course. Ignore them, Amish. That said, they do have a point. This is BF. BF= Big maps. Anyways, nice review. People don't seem to understand that this is your opinion, and are getting pretty angry you don't agree with them.

  • Bf3= shit campaign and amazing multiplayer...u complain about bf3 being the same...well look at mw3...same overpowered guns, same modded controller dicks and same gameplay to me...

  • Kinda sounded fan boyish bro. BF3 is so awesome and blows MW3 out of the water. Also, never play Conquest on the console. There isnt enough ppl to fight. Play Rush and its intense the entire time!

  • DO A SKYRIM REVIEW!!!!

  • the maps are too big? wow, aome of the battlefield 1942 maps were about 4 to 5 times as big as these maps. altough, the shear amount of tanks,planes,jeeps, and other thing needed big maps. i remember gazala being so big if you didnt have a tank, jeep, or plane it would take 2 minutes just to get across the map. and i loved it the most out of any battlefield :) just personal preferance though...

  • omfg, co op was fun! im pretty sure MW2 didn't invent 2 player co op.  The campaign was pretty shit, but it was more emotional than cod, were it has you masacering hundreds, then expecting you to feel sad when some guy on your side dies. Also, you forgot about the great voice acting in the campaign, the charachters sound like they're having an actual conversation, and not everything is so serious, unlike call of duty where a serious tone is set in a completely non serious game. you were biased

  • totaly agree

  • BF3 was based on MoH 2010, as MoH was "the test/alpha" for this game.

    Only $59.99! Buy it and realize you also bought Minecraft's Alpha! Another satisfied customer!

  • Actually, Amish, you CAN customize your class between matches.

  • @ManOfDeath567 How???

  • @AirsoftBadBoy You have to go into "My Soldier" in the main menu and then choose Customize.

  • @ManOfDeath567 I mean between match not in the main menu

  • Ya, this game has great graphix, but that's all it has; good graphix! It seems like they thought too much about the graphix and nothing else. My that I mean they didn't care about new ideas. They focused more on the graphix instead of everything else and that caused them to take from Cod. It's like an assignment that requires drawing a picture and writing an essay on it. BF3 drew an incredible picture, but failed the essay. And the essay is what most people care about. I'm gonna stick with MW3!

  • blackburn? like from blackhawk down???

  • Amish I'm very disappointed, you reviewed this game just like if you was a CoD fanboy:

    You say that the campaign suck dicks in your own word but I find it very fun.

    The campaign last 6 hours and you say that it's short ARE YOU KIDDING ME???

    To be good at piloting any vehicle, YOU NEED PRACTICE!!!

    The 4 kits are not "custom class" like CoD, they have different ability to help the team.

    You can only change class during game cuz a game is 20 minutes long in general.

    This review is insulting -_-

  • @AirsoftBadBoy bf3 is alot of camping and is really boring also your bias against cod

  • @AirsoftBadBoy

    The campaign is short and awful. Why would I want to play a terrible 6 hour campaign when something like CoD4 or WaW had a 8-10 hour campaign?

    No one can drive the vehicles, they're not player friendly in anyway.

  • @Spoothead12 Did you even play it? The campaign last long enough and I had a lot of fun playing it, and replaying it unlike CoD

  • @AirsoftBadBoy 6 hours is very short.

  • @TheFaisalano CoD campaigns last about 5 hours then stfu

  • @AirsoftBadBoy I agree that 6 hours is slow but I really like the co-op...

  • @ManOfDeath567 Yeah it's really great ^^

  • @AirsoftBadBoy Also Amish claims the game borrows so much from CoD but I vehemently disagree with that statement.

  • Comment removed

  • @AirsoftBadBoy WAIT WAIT WAIT WAIT, you think this review is insulting? you not one of BF3's devs so you cannot give this video such a title.

  • @MidgetRage666 THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT??? Battlefield is the first FPS that I played and I'm still a big fan of what DICE have made and I'm veteran 5 can you beat that?

  • @AirsoftBadBoy Actually I can beat that, I have been playing FPS games since the N64, you have only played 1. Play a hell of alot of other FPS games then come back and tell me that yuo are still a fan of what DICE has done.

  • @MidgetRage666 shut up man Cod 4, mw2, black ops, bad company 1 and 2, battlefield 3 and even agent 007 nightfire and many other. Don't try to do like if you know me :P

  • @AirsoftBadBoy I dont know you, i never said I did. You said that BF3 was your 1st FPS game you played. and No i will not shut up, i have every right to talk as much as you do.

  • @MidgetRage666 I NEVER SAID THAT BF3 IS THE BEST FPS I HAVE EVER PLAYED!! It's a good game, very good game but since not perfect and is not flawless but this review is a big shit, that shithead is saying bullshit just to justify that MW3 is a better game but he didn't do the review of it be cause he know that even if BF3 have a lot of flaws, it's still better than MW3. Now please shut up.

  • @AirsoftBadBoy Your right, you didnt say that it wa the best FPS you played. You said it was your first you played. Why bring MW3 into this? Oh wait ANOTHER FUCKING SHITHEAD FANBOY. Can you please leave, your kind isnt welcome around here.

  • @AirsoftBadBoy Thats because the CoD campaign goes through 3 games not 1 like this

  • @123sniperzz What??

  • @AirsoftBadBoy im not a battlefield player (yet) but i agree Amish did kinda half ass it and reviewed like a fanboy :S

    i still love ya tho amish (NO HOMO)

  • Cod for hyperactive solos, battlefield for team players finesse.

  • Ragingamish, i am a big fan of yours, and i also like the battlefield series a lot. However, i think your review is too focused on the campaign. I mean, really. When most people get the game, they play the multiplayer first. Some even never play the campaign. About 90 percent of the time playing the game is spent on multiplayer, and not campaign. These days, multiplaer is all the rage, and campaign is just a little side dish. Dont get me wrong, i love playing the campaign, and i also play it be

  • its a war game its based of real war not the fucking navy seals going into osamashouse and re spawning in the same area

  • In my truly honest opinion, this game fucking sucks. I expected BF3 to be the best war FPS ever. I thought it would kick the asses of its predecessors AND the CoD games. But it turned out to be downright horrible. The campaign is unbelievably bad, the co-op even worse, and the multiplayer isn't anything new and awesome. Instead, they took BC2 and added some CoD stuff and connection issues.

    I've bought many games this year, and BF3 is the only one I regret. I have zero temptation to play it...

  • Imagine COD with Battlefield's graphics

  • the only difference I can see in black ops and bf3 story is that in bf3, Sgt. blackburn was comfy while interrogated. in black ops Alex Mason was electrocuted, beaten up and has major migraine issues while interrogated

  • The vehicles are designed to be a simulation. In Battlefield Bad Company 2 the helicopters were incredibly easy to fly, and everybody dove in them as soon as they spawned. Now a skilled player has the oppurtunity to completely destroy the other team. I honestly have no complaints for vehicle controls. The only negative I agree with is the pre-game lobby restrictions. And if you honsetly believe battlefield is just a good game and that MW3 is a great one, you should probably wake up.

  • @fashionloveart black ops just did it far better than bf3 and did it before bf3. why would bf3 even consider this type of story/ EXACT story when black ops did it last year and in some cases cod4 did it years ago.

  • @NextGenTrophys just because it came out first doesn't mean it cant straight out borrow or copy ideas from other games. what your saying is if bf3 had perks and killstreaks it wouldn't be copying Cod just because it came out first even though cod had it first and bf never did? kids nowadays...

  • BF3 does vehicles great. You just dont have the patience to learn how to use them. And mw campaings are as shitty as bf campign is. But its worse, because it ahs shittier graphics.

  • The 2005 EA FPS, B.L.A.C.K., actually used the flashback device to drive its plot, so it's not like Black Ops revolutionized that front.

  • YES YES! MORE FAMILY GUY REFERENCES! I HAPPEN TO BE WATCHING THE GRIND MY GEARS EPISODE RIGHT NOW.

  • There's a contollable T-90 in the game. So it's automatically 39% more awesome

  • This review is honestly not good, He says "it's borrowing ideas from COD" Even when BF came before COD

  • I'm a COD fan but the general tone of this review does seem pretty biased towards COD. Reviews should be primarily based on what the game is now, not what came before it. I dont think Amish played the multiplayer enough to get into the feel of it and was just looking for things that were COD-like.

  • the maps are big because they are made from 32 or 64 people not 24

  • "i want to be fair..." lol

  • Uhhh......2:10

    That's about the same length as the CoD campaigns, you do realize that right?

  • well at least they didn't get something from WaW

  • For the most part, i agree with your review. I wish instead of the BF3 SP & Co-Op they would of done the BF2 SP & Co-Op which was bots.

  • theres not any less destructible environments than BFBC2. its MORE realistic so that a grenade cant explode an entire wall. use rpgs and shit and you'll see theres a LOT of destruction

  • i bought BF3 for the multiplayer and honestly i really like the game but im also quite disappointed that there's less destructible environments than in BFBC2

  • Their is def a hint of cod fanboy-ism in this review no matter how much you say it's not ha

    You play a little to much cod making this review obsolete.

  • @TheRedDash i think he's onto something there. the server connection problems you had is solely your own as i, for one, RARELY experience such issues. i spend about 15 sec looking for a server... also cod didn't invent two player co-op or custom classes, so yes those two features are not original, but cod is not to be credited for them ether. as for vehicles, they are SUPPOSE TO BE HARD TO CONTROL, because if they weren't ...

  • @MonkeyEnus well i guess you haven't had an adept enemy pilot F*** yo S*** up yet. seriously one person can do a tone of damage in a chopper. if everybody could fly like an ace then guess what you would have - an equivalent of MW2 op killstreaks except they never expire and can be repaired of damaged.

  • I actually think BF3's multiplayer is better than MW3's...that being said, I decided to get MW3 over BF3 because unlike most people I actually do spend a significant amount of time on the solo content.

  • @Agumon5 MW3's campaign is MUUUUUUUUUUUUCHHHHHHHH better..

  • bf3 completely focuses on russians in multiplayer and there always against americans ive never seen that before: black ops cod 4 mw2 mw3

  • So basically the PC Version is 10x better, the maps aren't small enough to accommodate the player size but they need to have some size for vehicles.

  • I love you Amish you always come out with the best reviews <3

  • Feel free to stand by your opinion, but let me just make a case for BF3's multiplayer here. For one thing, if you keep disconnecting, maybe your NAT type is not open? It used to happen to me, but I changed it and now I never d/c. so that may be your problem, not the game's. Second, the ground vehicle controls are fine, and I feel that the helicopter and jet controls have a steep learning curve so it requires a certain degree of skill, since they can be rather game-changing if used properly.

  • Completely agree with this, the only things that I would add are the jumping over things animation fails so much in multi player and the horrific spawning in team deathmatch, i don't know about the other game modes but TDM makes me sad.

  • Playing the multiplayer on PC is A LOT better than on console.

  • agree on the single multilayer but on the online...

  • I didn't like stories with the whole flash back thus the reason I didn't get into Black Op's story mode.

  • Wheres the friggin mw3

  • Amish sorry! You are awesome! I just was pissed of. So what in your opininion is well sized maps?

  • Thank god! An honest review of this game! I mean really, why are the fanboys so in love with this game? COD fanboys are ten year olds who are annoying, but Battlefield fanboys are 36 year old MEN who have no lives and have never gotten laid. Really! Just play the game!

  • I know you meant the absolute best when comparing BF3 to the Call of Duty franchise, but some of your statements, like the part from 2:20 to 3:06, sound completely biased. A movie lover such as yourself should know that flashbacks are something used to further a story and that many radical groups in the real Middle East are in control of WMDs. I love many of your reviews and i know you release the best content you can but i think this is just unacceptable.

  • *unsubscribe*

  • @ElCholo2579 Wait........so you originally subscribed because of Amish's CoD videos when you get all pissed when he reviews Battlefield?

  • @Toxicboy24598 no... something i hate is fanboys. he says battlefield is a copy of COD when COD is a copy of other games (zombies/spec ops is a copy of survival mode in GOW for example and the story plot of a middle eastern country with nukes has been in movies way before COD. same thing goes to battlefield fanboys. battlefield did use some ideas from other games.its like jeans in general the original idea came from levi's and most jeans in your closet are probably not levi's, yet your notwhinig

  • @ElCholo2579 You see it was EA who wanted BF3 to be compared to MW3 not Amish and plus back in Bad Company 2 (Which I own) where the only similarity between BFBC2 and CoD was that it was a FPS, So he is saying that it was a step-down from BFBC2.

    Heres my reasons for not liking BF3

    1. I play on the PC, so i VERY pissed when i had to install origin just to play and i had to re-add my friends

    2.Sometimes games move VERY slowly even with 20+ players

    3.BUGS!Glitches!

    4.Vehical whores

  • I disagree on the "if it wasn't fun alone, it won't be with a friend." Playing with a friend, from my experience, usually makes it better. Even if you're doing badly.

  • I love this game and I agree with most of what you say, but to be fair, DICE wanted an online only game and EA more or less forced them to put in a campaign. Thus why it's kinda bleh. Also, Battlefield has been around since 2002, which would make Call of Duty the thief in this case. I'm not a fanboy, I just wish Call of Duty would go back to the good old days of run n' gun fun with little worry about camping and killstreaks.

  • Just sounds like a cod fan reviewing the game, seriously those story lines, modes and class options did exist before COD its not BF3 is copying them from them

  • The best part about BF3 by far:

    CoD player: There's a f***ing camper behind that wall.

    BF3 player: What wall?!

  • @D0youknowWhoIam CoD player: No scope 200 yards away LOL!

    BF3 player: 800 yard shot... 18 inch bullet drop... target running... one bullet to reload... challenge accepted... Boom Headshot... Fuck Yeah...

  • @D0youknowWhoIam

    BF3 player got shot

    CoD player: that wall

  • @D0youknowWhoIam There is no destruction in Battlefield 3, or at least, it's not promenant. This is coming from a battlefield player.

  • @D0youknowWhoIam Doesn't work in bf3, buildings don't blow up like the use to........

  • @D0youknowWhoIam FAIL.

  • @D0youknowWhoIam I think BF3 destruction was overrated. I could blow up anything for shit :P

  • @D0youknowWhoIam Minecraft player: I just built that wall.

  • @NintendmanMidget Creeper: that's a nice wall you have there  sssss...

  • When EA said they were competing with IW they did not mean in the same way that treyarch and IW do and make the best CoD, It was still going to be a different game. The battlefield series has been around longer than CoD 4 so to say they stole ideas from it is wrong. I agree with most of your points, I just feel you failed to mention good ones: you play in a squad; the sound; the animations; a suppression system; destructible terrain; vehicle combat; can change classes in game, dedicated servers.

  • Beautiful as always, but I did sort of get the feeling that it wasn't so much as "Let's review this game" as it was "Let's compare this game to CoD".

  • Come on ya lazy amish, where are the mw3 weapons

  • amish this review is so gay you faggot call of duty fag

  • @mustard0197 So many ways to insult you... So little care.

  • @GodOfQwerty lol

  • @JrVargas13 lol someone having there period? quit bitching..... fanboy

  • Hey RagingAmish, outside of this review do you plan on doing anything further with Battlefield 3, ala gameplay videos or reviews?

  • I am a Battlefield fan boy and I will be the first to defend Battlefield3 and at first I found amish trash talking the game. But he is right on MOST parts. You dont play Battlefield with a COD mindset. Battlefield's story mode IS lacking but the co-op is more or less for a more tactical feel of Battlefield3's storyline. And Battlefield's MP is more or less for teamwork than a run-and-gun style . but other than that, you are right! And I also hate the vehicle controls. BRING BACK BC2 CONTROLS!!!

  • no-one cares about the campaign...mp on pc, consoles sucks balls, looks terrible and small player counts/// pc = where battlefield should be played, if u play bf3 on consoles go home!

  • Cod 4 invented radical islamic terrorism? And Iran possessing nukes is really just a MW rip off?

  • @Zylo587 As WickedShrapnel would say... Stop Trolling For Unicorns.

  • @ManOfDeath567 I object, I am not trolling. I am simply making my point in a hateful, sarcastic and malicious way. My intentions are sincere, my methods are suspect.

  • @Zylo587 no...but come on. overall, bf3 does look a lot like cod.

  • @DWierdo666 And CoD looks suspiciously like Moh. Which looks a lot like Wolfenstein 3D. And that seems like a copy of... of...

    Ok, W3D was pretty creative.

  • @Zylo587 yeah, all so true :). but the points amish makes about ea trying to make a non-cod, and now making something that does look a lot like cod, are pretty true.

  • @DWierdo666 It is simply a repeat of cliche action movies that CoD 4 took ideas from. Americans love to imagine they are killing Russians or Muslims. Call of Duty did not invent this, nor did Activision copy-right it.

  • @Zylo587 He wasn't trying to suggest COD invented these ideas... he's talking about how BF3 isn't as original as people think it is. It is clear that BF3 took some ideas from COD.

  • @NimbleTurtle13 And CoD took ideas from other games and movies. The game industry develops through evolution, rather that revolution. And who gives a shit about the plot anyway? In most cases, the plot is stupid.

  • @Zylo587 HE NEVER SAID THAT. HE'S SAYING THAT BOTH GAMES HAVE THE SAME CONCEPT. MY GOODNESS.

  • @L118AwEsOmE And he's mad that they do. MW was not creative plot-wise. Why should BF3 be held to a higher standard?

  • @Zylo587 BF3 is a fictional story based off of today's war. MW3 takes place in during a war that hasn't even happened yet. He's mad that the plot wasn't creative. Chances are we'll still have middle eastern wars in 10-20 years. What makes MW3 more creative is that they MADE their own war. And EA has been trying to compete with activation for years. Amish isn't stupid. It's OBVIOUS they adapted A LOT of plot from CoD.

  • @L118AwEsOmE War with Russia was the plot of American and Western European's nightmares (and occasionally dreams) from 1945-1991. There are movies and games I could argue inspired both games.

  • @Zylo587 Very valid point. In that case both games are at fault :)

  • @L118AwEsOmE Nonsense. Plots are often inspired by other plots. Such a thing is almost inevitable.

  • @Zylo587 So... Pro BF, Pro MW3, or neutral?

  • @L118AwEsOmE Neither. I like both series, but I am not thrilled about the third iteration of both. I am begging for a Battlefield 1975, or 1945. I hope CoD makes an effort to be creative, and maybe bring back some of the basics that made the first five games so fun.

  • Citizen Kane copied flashbacks from Black Ops?

  • I agree with you mostly, i am nor a BF or COD fanboy (I play both.) And i think wlaking into this review you had a mental set that COD is better because, let's face it...Who really plays campaign that much? Its all about the multiplayer not really campaign, i i will rate it 9/10 and for MW3 which i pre-ordered and just played i rate it a good 9/10 also. Both good games, but both have issues.

  • @MaTailSwagin

    i agree,I'm buying MW3 today,but i still Love Battlefield 3 (which i also own).they are both special in their own ways,battlefield 3 is a war simulator, while Call of Duty is more of a fast paced action movie.i love both,but they both have flaws.people need to grow up and try a game before they decide they don't like it.

  • GOD, you people are such BF3 fanboys. If he ripped on the campaign who cares no one plays that retarded thing any way, he enjoyed the multiplayer. Tell me one time you enjoyed a battle field or call of duty campaign enough to care.

  • MW3... that is all.

  • Good honest review, I haven't I own this and am enjoying it with friends, but I'm still on the fence about mw3, I look froward to your videos on it. But I may never buy it.

  • You should have added that all multiplayer issues exist exclusively in console versions. PC version supports larger number of players, which elliminates "too large" map problem, and controls on PC is easy and intuitive. And almost no connection issues whatsoever.

  • amish, you just swayed me from buying bf3 to mw3, you better be right on this

  • Your a fuken fanboy Amish. MW3 is a fuken copy n paste game, it's same as mw2. Btw I been playing COD since cod 2 n the shit just got repetitive. So BF3 beats MW2 1/2, any day of the week.

  • Comment removed

  • @JrVargas13

    its just a fucking game get over it your acting justin bieber fangirl

  • @JrVargas13 Wait......so your saying that sequels are NOT suppose to be similar to its earlier counter-parts?

  • you know what grinds my gears? when people compare battlefield and call of duty(thumbs up if you got the reference)

  • Amish you are a hero! everyone has been saying this like "yeah bf is great and its better than cod" etc for a long time because they have not DARED to say what is true. now you have ( hopefully ) broken that fear!

  • @Dranious he said he liked the game. dumbass...

  • Well said amish! bf3 sucks

  • Well said dude.

  • You forgot to mention the horrifying spawns in TDM >_>

  • Nice review as expected. But regarding the vehicle controls, is it really a bad thing that they have such a high lurning curve? To me it seems like it'll reduce campers, and last Bad Company game was the same, somewhat.