Pt.2 Forbidden History: Dinosaurs and the Bible

[Rikshore]

Grow up...

[restoringgenesis]

@Rikshore Thoughtful comments would be well received. "Grow up..." does not qualify as a thoughtful comment. At least you did not use profanity like so many that disagree with the content of this video series. Regards, Jeff

[pauldude000]

Alexander, that is a thought. Could it also be possible that they actually saw them?

The problem is that bones do not of themselves give an accurate picture of what the animal actually looked like with a flesh overlay. At best you could expect what we see in science today, a constant revision of 'what it looked like'. As a for instance neanderthal man, originally a weird looking ape, to someone you might see in a suit. Consider both views were with current knowledge of anatomy as well.

[restoringgenesis]

That could be. If the historical records of nearly all cultures were not replete with such accounts of men having encounters with giant reptiles, it might be plausible. Many of the stories are simply accounts of common people and their interactions with these creatures. These accounts are even up into the recent past and some still today in remote locations.

[alexander74511]

hey couldn't it be that dragons are mentioned throughout history because people actually found dinosaur bones throughout history, and because people didn't know anything about evolution and because they were told that the world was only 6000 years, the most logical conclusion for them was to think, this this animal were actually alive somewhere in the mountains. I don't know about you but that sounds more likely to me.

[ForeverFlame88]

Radiometric dating is not reliable because it rests on unprovable assumptions! Subscribe! :)

[Prairiecoyotehunter]

Thank you for posting this video series, I am writing a 4H speech on this very topic and your video was very helpful.

[donawyo]

Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!! Stand strong and keep up God's work.

[flamifer1]

What a bunch of BS! The radio dating of the stones clearly showing dinosaurs does not point to their autheticity, but proves that they are fakes, produced to sell them to willing victims. The gargoyles are depicting devils and the 16th century Aztek sculptures depicting Jaguars do not even resemble the head of a T-Rex when squeezed like that.

[restoringgenesis]

@flamifer1 Believe what you will. There are plenty more stories throughout history of men seeing and killing dinosaurs (dragons). The stories cover every culture in the world. The evidence will continue to grow as the cultural and language barriers come down. I am excited about the potential of learning more about Chinese history and their rich history of dinosaurs and man. Thanks for the comment.

[Ipimptwinkies1]

stop huffing gas and come back to reality.

[restoringgenesis]

@Ipimptwinkies1 Thoughtful and/or inquiring comments and questions are respected. This was not a thoughtful comment. If you would like to comment thoughtfully do so, but if you comment like this again. I will not post. Kind regards, Jeff

[slimm774]

thanks for spending your time on this.

[sclock2]

I think just the fact that there have been modern day sightings of supposedly extinct creatures such as the lochness monster, mekele mbembe, and yes even bigfoot, (there are fossils of a giant ape like creature thought to have gone extinct 400,000 years ago) adds more support for the message these videos are trying to get across.

[DarkMind95]

@sclock2 Oh yeah, and those sightings definetly are not hoaxes and they are definetly the real deal. I mean come on! The original video tape for the bigfoot has the word "hoax" all writen on it. The picture taken from the Loch Ness "monster" looks more like a swan to me. And mbembe has no proof of it's existance whatsoever.

[ForeverFlame88]

@sclock2 With radiometric dating, if the dates match the theory, they are accepted and if they don't match, they're rejected. The accepted dates are actually selected dates. Subscribe! :)

[Melbournevilla]

This isn't exactly hard proof either is it? A lot of this is mere coincidence.

[restoringgenesis]

@Melbournevilla Hi thanks for the comment. I do think that so of the evidence is convincing. I would not call it hard proof. Hard proof for anything in the ancient past is quite a task, but I think that as we translate more and more documents from other places, we will find similar things. Kind Regards, Jeff

[thoostorm4]

@restoringgenesis right on man many people hateonme for dhowing vids lie this

[Melbournevilla]

@restoringgenesis There isn't a considereable amout of real proof, nothing written down by any one civilization that isn't an ambiguous statement or one that can be clearly argued as myth. And even if they did (and im assuming here) that wouldn't completly prove your argument of creationism

[restoringgenesis]

@Melbournevilla I am not trying to prove anything. Just presenting a view and some evidence and letting people decide for themselves what to think. Kind regards, Jeff

[ForeverFlame88]

@Melbournevilla Well, the evidence for macro-evolution is shaky: For example, homologous structures can prove a Common Designer who designed similarly because He knew similar functions would require similar parts instead of proving a common ancestor. Subscribe! :)

[cutiecookie23]

Another fact that shows the accuracy of Christianity and the Bible. Thanksyou! This is was very intersting, I love dinosuars and reptiles :D

[kakashi303]

I think this explains the idea of the dragon more than where the dinosaurs come in in the bible. I'm not religious, but I was hoping to see where Dinosaurs came in... Nothing yet, Still very interesting!

[sclock2]

@kakashi303 You do know these videos are trying to explain that dinosaurs and dragons are one in the same?

[gregrutz]

JOB 40:

15 Behold now behemoth

16 His strength is in his loins and his force is in the navel of his belly.

Dinosaurs come from eggs, THEY DON’T HAVE NAVELS.

[restoringgenesis]

@gregrutz The Hebrew word for "navel" in this passage, שרירי shariyr, translates to sinew, muscle.

this is a difference in translation from the Hebrew not a contradiction.

[gregrutz]

@restoringgenesis So you are saying there are lots of errors in the Bible !

[restoringgenesis]

@gregrutz no that's not what I said.

[Vlaxerman343]

@restoringgenesis awesome vid restoringgenesis, you are truly a man with God given talents I say I have enjoyed this video and will enjoy many others you have, and on a side note, I have to say that I really love how you press your point instead of continuing on in an argument like I always do and end up on a different point..... I guess that didn't matter, but good job

[r44cker]

@gregrutz Not errors in the bible, but errors in translation. Thats possible.

[xtremejohnny69]

Is it possible, that maybe, just maybe, these cultures found dinosaur bones when mining and other activities that involve digging in the earth? I mean, these cultures also have stories of wizards and magical talking animals, and griffins, does that mean all those things are real too?

[restoringgenesis]

@xtremejohnny69 There are many documents that report "dragons" .as a matter of fact in their historical records. No doubt there are stories that are not true, but you can't just disregard historical data which is regarded as relevant except when it comes to the dragons mentioned.

[IWasAPepper]

Not to be a party pooper but I think that the thing at 8:02 is supposed to be a hippo

Also I have no idea what the things at 8:30 are supposed to be. I know it's not but they look more like long-necked kangaroos than saurapods. Also 9:02 doesn't look like a dinosaur either.

9:05 is totally a giraffe. No questions asked.

[WunterSlaush]

why aren't there found younger bones of dinosaurs, or dinosaurbones used as tools?

that would be a lot more proof

[KoolitPnoi]

@WunterSlaush there weren't but there were dinosaur eggs found in the Gobi. Isn't that evidence enough for you?

[MarineSpartan1]

Well, I was hoping to see the truth and correlation to the Bible, but I have watched two of these videos and NOT ONE Biblical reference to scripture about these dinosaurs being mentioned in the Bible? When will we see these are all in the Bible?...

[fffreddie]

@MarineSpartan1 If you have a Bible(King James Version) check out Job 41:1-41:34. If not search the Net. There you will see the word Leviathan and the description. Read it and think about what it describes.

[gregrutz]

@TheGetano1 Correct, there is nothing in the bible about dinosaurs. Just Dragons.

Dinosaurs are a type of reptile, all reptiles lay eggs.

Mammoths are mammals like you, they don't come from eggs.

Mammoths were not around when dinosaurs ruled the earth for 160 Million years.

Are you home schooled?

[gregrutz]

@TheGetano1 '' you are an evolutionist. '' What is an evolutionsit? I am a Chemist.

And you sound like Ray Comfort. ' The first dog, he evolved for millions of years and then had to find a female he could mate with.'' LOL Breeding populations evolve not individuals.

Or kent hovind. '' you only know something died, you don't even know if it had kids''

Breeding populations evolve not individuals!

Tired of arguing with ppl believing rubbish. If creationists only had half a brain!

[2face15]

Animals that come from eggs do have navels, but then loose them (in some cases the animals do have permanent marks) when they get older.

[gregrutz]

JOB 40:

15 Behold now behemoth

16 His strength is in his loins and his force is in the navel of his belly.

Dinosaurs come from eggs, THEY DON’T HAVE NAVELS.

[restoringgenesis]

@gregrutz I do sense so much animosity in all of your responses. This is an open forum.  No need to shout with your words.

[Myhopeisinhim]

@gregrutz

There is a cord that attaches embryos to a yolk sac so it is possible that they could have something equivalent to a belly button.

[matamat2k]

The Vikings ALSO descriptet dragons in various forms, mainly used on old tree buildings ore the viking ships

[2face15]

Gilgamesh is one of the many names of Nimrod who is mentioned in the Book of Genesis and Books of Chronicles in the Holy Bible.

[enigma2213322133]

4:16 made me lol, how can you see a resemblance

[bihlbo]

Some of this should not be seen as evidence. Even the earliest descriptions of Chinese dragons points to them being amalgamations of many other creatures - this is just as likely to be referencing the mascot animals of the number of tribes defeated by the Chin dynasty, which were then integrated into the Chin mascot which became a dragon, as it is likely that the description was a way to reference more common animals to describe a living dragon/dinosaur.

[almightycatman]

I always find these videos entertaining. Silly, but entertaining!...

[eagc7]

there could explanatiosn for the draws maybe they saw fossils and imagined how it coudl be when they were alive or they could have seen simialr creatures, i myself belivei dinso are extinct but who Knows, People have drew creatures liek bigfot in rocks or caves so who knows, personaly i would liek to see a videos or real pictures of living dinos

[restoringgenesis]

@eagc7 I present the evidence with my presuppositions and I mention those at the very beginning of the video. In my own continued study of dinosaurs and man, I have become more convinced that the dragons and serpents mentioned often in antiquity were dinosaurs. The descriptions are remarkably similar to those of dinosaurs. I would also like to see some photos of living dinosaurs or pterodactyls. Kind Regards.

[89Epro]

The story of noah and the flood was ripped off of the epic of gilgamesh. No man stuck 2 of every creature on a boat

[restoringgenesis]

@89Epro

There are many cultures that have a story from the past about a great world wide flood. The cross cultural similarities are amazing. I and many others think that it is not coincidence. It actually helps to verify the veracity of the story. Actually there has been a feasibility study on whether two of every "kind" could be taken on a vessel with the proportions give in the Bible. The book is called Noah's Ark: A feasibility study.

[restoringgenesis]

@89Epro I doubt that you have ever actually took a serious look at whether it is feasibly possible. I would encourage you to keep an open mind. Check out both sides of the argument without imposing your presuppositions on the conclusions you come to.

Take Care.

[imatelly]

@89Epro any man can get every animal on a small boat you just need a blood sample and some technology to recreate them after the flood,we can do it today so why not do it back then,we are talking about 1 of 2 things god or aliens in ither case it works just fine

[cu123ish]

@89Epro acually it is possible to get two of each animal on a larg boat wicth the ark was anyway whose to say that he gathered baby animals in two bye two and for the dinos and other creatures that laid eggs whos to say that he gathered two eggs for each of the animals u just have to look at the possibillitys of how he did it look with an opened mind

[inechiSAN]

Surprisingly logical. I hope its not just getting my hopes up! D:<

[kshe95realrockradio]

the bible accurate? the arguements about the bible outlining rules for slavery, killing children et... are taken out of context, right? if the answer is yes they are taken out of context then please direct me to the proper context and where it is in the bible. i ask this b/c i am trying to find it and have not received any help, do you know? i know this is a video about dino/man but i try to find the answers where someone will reply.

[restoringgenesis]

@kshe95realrockradio

Hi and thanks for your comment. I don't totally understand your comment, but I will do my best to answer as I understand. Slavery is a construct of man. God's design from the beginning was for man to live at peace with other men and with God. There were times in the Old Testament when God sanctioned the killing of a group of people. I can point you to some studies that help make sense of this. the website thenarrowpath(dot)com has some good lectures on such things.

[restoringgenesis]

@kshe95realrockradio

(2nd part)

If you go to this site and look under the navigation for "Topical Lectures" You will find some very good MP3 lectures on such subjects. I would encourage you to listen to some of them. The guy doing the lectures is really easy to listen to and makes a lot of sense. One particular lecture that is very good is called "The Authority of the Scriptures. The guys name is Steve Gregg.

[restoringgenesis]

@kshe95realrockradio

One more thing. I can say for sure that when Jesus Christ came, he came to restore and bring peace between God and man. It is God's desire that no man should perish, but live forever with him after the death of the body. I (now in this life) am an extension of Christ into the world. It is my job to show the world Christ love and gently guide people to Him. I hope all of this helps. I really encourage you to listen to some of those lectures.

[restoringgenesis]

@kshe95realrockradio

Lectures on the Bible verse by verse can also be found at theos(dot)org. Some of the Old Testament lectures will hopefully answer your questions.

Take Care

[micahrjohnson34]

@kshe95realrockradio The bible doesn't encourage slavery, it says to obey your master if you are a slave.....which is simply good advice, because if you don't you pry would get beaten and the master will treat you better if you do. God's rules all have reasons behind them.

[kshe95realrockradio]

yet not one shred of physical evidence! books written about the subject are not evidence, just as christians say the koran is not evidence of allah

[restoringgenesis]

The entire movie documents evidence both physical and written about dinosaurs and man. On the other point. The Bible has stood the test of over 1500 years of textual criticism. It stands. Middle East Archeology continues to verify the Bible. Skeptics like William F. Albritght (eminent archeologist) came to trust in the Bible as they discovered things in the middle east. The Koran nor any other ancient document comes close to the evidence for Biblical accuracy and trustworthiness.

[MrTantalust]

@kshe95realrockradio

"The less sensible the religious belief, the more desperately the followers embrace it."

[restoringgenesis]

@MrTantalust Jesus said: "Bless do good to those who hate, bless those who curse, serve others." Thanks for your quote.

[NinjaMantis101]

Interesting video. Two native American tribes, the Sioux and the Iroquis, are translated as the Snake and the Snake People. There are so many possiblities of what REALLY ever happened but since corporations control the mass media, we are fed a steady diet of lies that we all swear by. The first "dinosaur" or terrible lizard that man encountered may have been in the Garden of Eden...but who knows? It is fascinating though. Open mindedness is essential to creating our own rational on such things.

[MrTruthhurts777]

I guess you cannot argue with the historical FACTS. However, there are none so blind as those who do not want to see. Thank you for these terrific videos and God bless.

[TheyAreHere2]

@ one presidentifpeace yes but that's not the problem with this theory. It's that the people did such accurate drawing to what we think the dinosaurs would have looked like alive.

[TheyAreHere2]

Actually it has many times throughout history

[MISTERASMODEUS]

Science doesn't shut it's ears to logic and proof. It does require vigorous proof and will argue against the nonsense that countless charlatans and liars use to prey on the ignorant.

[OnePresidentOfPeace]

History seems strange at times, what do we believe in? Couldn't ancient civilizations discover most of dinosaur/dragon/reptilian fossils during their lifetime??

[TheBbg83]

It's sad people get all info off youtube and refuse to research anything on their own...I have researched many aspects of both and I believe the bible to be true and explains far more questions I have then does evolution.

[azidalbestrain]

JAJAJAJ I'M A DRAGON IN THE CHINESE CALENDAR

[AreoIedaeri]

Again, I tried to keep an open mind, but this slideshow of artifacts depicting various creatures hardly constitutes as evidence. What I don't understand is why did palaeontologists come to the conclusion that the dinosaurs lived 65 million years ago if they had all this "evidence" to go by?

And if you believe that they decided to ignore these artifacts, what reason would they have for doing so? Palaeontologists are scientists, they live to understand things and find the truth about the univers

[924142707]

@AreoIedaeri I believe that many people, especially many scientist, are very biased towards Evolutionism and literally shut their ears to anything outside of that paradigmn.

[gregrutz]

@924142707 Yes, once you study the facts that prove evolution it is hard to listen to religious stories.

[flamifer1]

@924142707

They are shutting their ears to nonsense like that, because it hurts. Just use common sense: If dinosaurs had lived together with man, why has not one human fossil ever been found found in a rock layer containing dinosaur fossils? Why are no dinsaur bones in the garbage heaps left by cave men? No wonder, people will start debunking this nonsense-video immediately. Because it is asking for it.

[restoringgenesis]

@flamifer1 There are examples of humans in the fossil record and some in the same rock layer as dinosaurs (search Malachite Man). Plenty of fossil human footprints as well. The problem with geologists and paleontologists is when they find evidence they contradicts what they believe(by faith) , they make excuses and call it "inconclusive evidence or they just totally ignore it as evidence. By the way, I am not asking anyone to believe this. I am just presenting another view. Peace.

[kendaigmj]

@AreoIedaeri

Because "dragons" were already regarded as myth. Most of the big and dangerous ones were likely hunted into extinction, and nobody cared to track how many were left, they just wanted them gone. Then as precautions against them were passed down, not knowing the creatures had become extinct, later generations didn't see the point, and presumed there were never any to begin with.

With "Dragons" being written off as myth, it's easily overlooked.

[StopNWO11]

the truth shall prevail! God bless