I'm very confused. I just watched the video very carefully. Hiibel never refused to identify himself. He was never asked by the officer, even once, to identify himself. He was repeatedly asked to SHOW identification. According to Terry, one is only required to SHOW identification (a driver's license) if one is operating a motor vehicle at the time the officer makes the detainment. Hiibel was not. Why was this case twice decided against Hiibel by the Appeals courts? It makes no sense.
I'm very confused. I just watched the video very carefully. Hiibel never refused to identify himself. He was never asked by the officer, even once, to identify himself. He was repeatedly asked to SHOW identification. According to Terry, one is only required to SHOW identification (a driver's license) if one is operating a motor vehicle at the time the officer makes the detainment. Hiibel was not. Why was this case twice decided against Hiibel by the Appeals courts? It makes no sense.
greggh 1 month ago
Can you refuse to show ID if an officer asks you for it?
emarieg 6 months ago
Comment removed
Xonegod 7 months ago
Is this the United States of America or the Soviet Union?
MrDUlaw 1 year ago
He lost the case. haha.
wbp2e 1 year ago
oh snap! i just researched this case!! incredible! thanks for this!!! :-D
salaamthebody 2 years ago
wow. he's the man.
zappalappaz 4 years ago