LOL I was clearing my throat when he said "it had a giant, feeding black hole", and it sounded like "it had a giant, fucking black hole" XD I had to back it up and re-listen to it
I would imagine if photons follow this hole's gravity's curvature, and their speed does not alter (light speed) in our measuring, than the interrelation between space and time does not change to our observing (still sound logical, or not?), BUT, we know that 'time' delays closer to gravity,so apart from collapsing 3D objects, before entering, photons wouldn't be decelerating within the time component relative to the space component.. But would in our measuring.As it is in our measuring in outer
I have no reason to hate you... oh wait I believe something different to you and my beliefs are right, your's are wrong; let's all start a rambling debate over youtube comments.
Can someone please explain to me how a star can collapse under it's own weight to form a black hole? I don't understand how it can become a black hole instead of just an incredibly dense ball of matter?
@BBCWorldwide This Star Trek music is really distracting me from the content of the video. How am I supposed to hear what these guys are saying when I'm prompted to start thinking about Kirk making out with alien babes or the ship being flooded with tribbles?
Choose different music next time, guys. Preferably something that doesn't deliver such a significant Pavlovian response (e.g. theme songs from popular television shows).
People such as Uaz31 make me want to totally not believe in God. Not that i am 100% religious but believing wont make me loose on nothing. What have i and you got to loose?
Still i take science very seriously and love everything about technology and space. But really 13,000 years? You are that stupid?
There is plenty of evidence for a young earth of only thousands of years and no evidence for a millions of years old Universe yet ignorant people like yourself ignore the facts to believe in your fairy tale of a billion years old Universe. Sorry guy but it didn't happen like that. We didn't evolve from primal goo. Also proper english sentence would be "Are you..." not "You are that..." and u call me stupid...lol.
@Savyn333 Bro, I've been watching some physicists talking about black holes, and some of them believe that the space and time broken in a black holes leads to a parallel universe, well if they say that who am I to disagree?
The Bible says 'Love thy neighbor', not 'Attack thy neighbor for there beliefs.' We are human, we are a single species with many minds that think differently. I believe in God, but I doubt He is happy with the fighting going on between scientists and religious people. How do you think He would feel? It's His place to judge, not yours. Believe whatever you want, its you life, your body mind and soul, and in the end, we all answer for our deeds. Live and let live.
Were we not created with curiosity, the brain power to think for ourselves? Why, answer me this, why can't people just believe what they want to believe? When we do that, amazing things happen, new things are created and we grow closer together as a species, but with this war between religion and science going on, we grow farther and farther apart. We live on this tiny planet in a vast expanse of the unknown. So why make our lives more difficult argueing over such trivial things?
Why are people arguing of God on a video about Black Holes? It's getting annoying to scroll down to try and read someone's theroy about the Universe, only to find "god sux!!1!" "no! you sux n00b!" Really now? Can we not get along? Do we have the ability to believe what we want? In religion, who is the only judge, who is the only one to say what is right and wrong? Where in the bible does it say, "Slay those who study the outer reaches." We are humans, we have free will.
@barrakkoooda if religion have one and only God... as we konow there is three of them islam, judaism and christianity... then that is the same God. The only defference is in how they praise Him.
i suppose you can discover anything if you throw enough tax payers dollars at it WHAT ABOUT THIS PLANET SQUARE EYED WANKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@RyanandJackpro1 Essentially, every galaxy would have one, if these theories are correct. The galaxy wouldn't necessarily be eaten up by the black hole, rather than rotate around it. The farther away you get from gravity, the less of a force it has. This means that we really wouldn't get sucked up into our galaxies black hole, the black hole is just rotating our galaxy. However, when you get near that thing, it would just.... spaghetti-fy anything that gets near it.
@Berniebays I know its isn't an actual hole. But I don't agree with you that it destroys matter!!. where is the law of conservation of energy gone then ?! I Have doubts and did you ask the question. Does black holes get heavier when it feeds on planets and galaxies ? and knowing that we have many sizes of those black holes it might confirm the fact the it stores the energy not destroying it!!
A few billion ears? The Universe has only been here 13,000 years, if it was years your referring to. 11,013 BC to be exact. Thats directly from God's word the Bible.
Fact is we have no idea how long that would take, our entire galaxy could be enveloped in it next year and we wouldn't even see it coming until the last moment.
Mankind thinks it always has all the answers but it doesn't. Fact is we know very little of the forces that govern our Universe.
oh please shut up. "the universe has only been here 13,000 years.
It's a proven fact that humans (not mentioning dinosaurs and alot of other organisms) have been around alot longer than that.
Save your bs for church and don't go around and whine your biassed church speak between a scientific youtube vid. People are watching this because its interesting and most likely true, go and indoctrinate someone else.
It's not a "proven fact" its actually quiet the opposite. Dino fossils are only one of many evidence for a flood of only a few thousand years not millions of billions. Those fossils would not even still be around in the ground if the world was only 1 million years old let alone billions of years.
On the same topic there are recent discoveries of dinosaur soft tissue found in dino bone within the fossils themselves proving they are in fact only thousand of years old at maximum.
Prove it, you can't. So therefore your only making assuptions. Radiometric dating is not accurate past known history being 3,000 Before Christ and it also is based on another assumption that all things have continued as they are, which is not known. So your opion really doesn't hold as any kind of "fact".
You also can't prove bible is 100% correct, regardless of what you have been told you have not been to witness everything that has happened during last "13,000" years...
Also I would like to point out that soft tissue from within dino fossils has been found several times, last time in 2009. And the fact that fossil remains would not still be in earth after 1 million let alone 65 million years. The earth would have swallowed them up by now.
You realize how long it takes for a lifeform to form? Thousands years of evolution, sure you may not believe in evolution but cmon.. Really you believe in magic "man" from sky creating the world? You think god created so many planets but only cares about humans? Why would he created other planets if he was only going to take care of this one....
You utter nonsense is simply proving your are arrogant brainwashed simpleton.
Wrong. Evilution is not scientifically possible, its a religion not a science. Micro variations do not equal macro evilution in animals. God is not a "magic man in the sky" He is God, He only became a man to demonstrate His sacrafice and mercy. God says why He created the Heavens in the Bible, they are for signs and seasons and to show His majesty, nothing more than that. He didn't create other life on them, we are the crown of His creation, created in His image.
@Uaz31 Evolution itself is very much scientifically possible and has been observed. Multiple times. Evolution is simply change through generations due to surroundings. Artificial evolution is called breeding, and it's how we got the bulldog. We created environments where one characteristic (really weird faces) survived, and other characteristics didn't. Aka, evolution. It happens to be artificial, but it is still very much evolution. Natural evolution is the thing in question... sorta.
" Evolution itself is very much scientifically possible and has been observed. "
Wrong. Thats a false statement and you know it and so does the scientific community. Yall try to sidestep the issue by claiming micro variations equals macro evilution but thats simply not the case. Variations do happen within a perticular kind of animal but never from one animal to another kind of animal. Never has that been observed nor is it even biologically possible, and yet you believe it.
@Uaz31 Look at a wolf. Do you see the wolf? Now look at a bulldog. We're not talking micro variations. We're talking quite large variations. It has been observed multiple times, what you have is terror that because evolution happens, you're somehow less of a person. Ya know what? You're right. You're quite insignificant. We all are. If aliens observed Earth, according to some definitions of 'ruling', they wouldn't know if ants or humans ruled.
Wolves and bulldogs are both canines, thats an example of micro variation not macro evilution, as is every example evilutionists proclaim as micro. Its all doggie DNA thats why one can interbreed most canines because they are all the same kind of animal. Theres this thing you probably don't know about but animal breeders pick out certain animals to develop those perticular traits, farmers do the same with our food crops. Thats why we have such variety in the dog, we induced it.
Also I would like to point out that soft tissue from within dino fossils has been found several times, last time in 2009. And the fact that fossil remains would not still be in earth after 1 million let alone 65 million years. The earth would have swallowed them up by noww
Its a bone in which the cellular structure has been replaced with quartz so it doesnt decay so it can stay intact forever but fossilising is only possible in rare kind's of soil
and that is why there arent that many bone's left.
Yes, I know what a fossil is. Fossilizing is possible in any type of soil that doesn't matter what matters is that it is rapidly buried and has a water source.
Arn't many bones left? lol. Fossils are not bones. Altho they have discovered dinosaur bone and soft tissue within fossilized dino bone.
Also, fossils do not stay intact forever. They are rock and subject to the same conditions the rest of the earth is and the Earth is constantly being turned within. After just 1 million years any fossils on the surface would have been completely consumed by the earth into magma. So no they can only be thousands of years old.
First of all they are not bones they are rock sediments, thats what fossils are. There is no way to date any fossil that far back because there is no way to accurately date anything past known history being 3,000 BC. Radiometric dating is not reliable, especially not past known history as it suggests all things have remained as they are now for huge amounts of time and there is no way to verify that. Its all guess work.
Radiometric dating assumes all things have remains constant and that nothing has changed. Going back a few thousand years that can be somewhat accurate to date but we are talking hundreds of thousands and even millions of years and to make assumptions like that and call them fact is ludicris. Its not science its pseudo science when you call an assumption a fact, thats a fact.
@Uaz31 well where is you fact in saying universe is 13,000 your old sounds like real bs to me because the light from the 60% of stars we can see in the sky wouldnt have reached earth in 13,000 years.
The Bible is where I get 13,000 years since creation. I suggest "Adam when?" from Familyradio dott comm online literature for reference.
As far as the light from the stars, that light was already here. Therefore it didn't need to travel to get here. He said, "let there be light" not ok, now I have to wait 500 billions years for light to reach here.
That is circular reasoning. That's not a valid form of argument. Also the bible is subjective not objective, leaving it open to interpretation. That alone destroys this argument.
Right. Okay. Lets review your statement. "..that light was already here." This means that the light would have had to instantaenously travel from its source to the required position in space. This means the light would have moved faster than it possibly could have to reach this staging point so that it could. Do you see the failure in logic here?
The light would not of had to "travel" at all, God created the Heavens, Earth and the light from the stars. Im saying that the light from stars was already here when they were created, it never traveled to get here so no it did not move faster than the speed of light. Bible says God "divided the light from the darkness", He said also, "let there be light" not ok now I will wait 500 billion years for light to arrive here.
Evidently you have no understanding of the fundamental physical princples which govern reality. That you choose to remain ingorant to them is something I lament.
I have much understanding of the funamental physical principles which govern reality but it is obvious to me you do not. Your statement is a reflection of what you are in fact guilty of but I must add that you are not mearly ignorant but willfully ignorant as you know I am correct but choose to deny reality.
@Uaz31 Is this the extent of what you have to say? Simply plugging your ears and going "I know you are but what am I"? I should expect as much. I question why you even bother to interact with people who hold opposing view points.
Enjoy your fairy tales, though it galls me to know you're doing so flagrantly while sitting in front of a machine that people like me helped create.
Yes, Gros this is the extent of what I have to say thats why it ends with a period. Unless there is something else you need me to elaborate on. You can repeat your childlike mantras all you want Im really outgrown for that and not interested.
You enjoy your fairy tales too, evilution is a funny one at that. People like you created my computer? lol. Ya you keep telling yourself that, whatever makes yourself feel all important I guess. bye.
@Uaz31 I thought we had finished 2 days ago. Ironic you say I use a mantra, as that is a spiriturality term and I reject the supernatural. As for the computer, yes scientists and engineers created it. Not that you care but I attended engineering school and graduate with a Bacholer's. For your information being an engineer doesn't make me feel important, very little does as it serves me no purpose.
@Uaz31 All I have to do to realize that my existance is a tiny and meaningless thing is to look up into the night sky and see the countless billions of stars which comprise the vast and uncompromising universe. Any sort of self importance I could ever feel is nothing but a delusion and I recognize it as such. Maybe you will learn this for yourself one day.
Oh I have Gros, Im a Christian remember? Only part your missing is giving credit to God part in your deep thought there. Yes, we are nothing but God is something.
@Carekka77 Yay Frodo! 2000 years ago, we had a dark age. Stories were lost, one story survived, with a symbol that people used for support in crappy lives. In the Renaissance, stories were revived, but 2000 years later, there are buildings with crosses on them. Another dark age hits. Stories are lost. One story with a symbol survives, and the pattern repeats. A new Renaissance, stories are revived, but 2000 years later, we have buildings with the One Ring on them."
God dosn't have a genre so why are you calling it "he"? Infact our simple human minds don't understand the principal of God, we don't know what God actually is. God can be energy, the universe, big bang, all human society or any other living lifeforms...
Also why are you so judgemental? Aren't you suppose to forgive and honor/respect other peoples believes?
Nah you no religious you are simply wanting a E-War...
No God doesn't have a genre but He became a man in order to demonstrate His sacrafice and mercy on mankind. He became a man because of the order of mankind that just as the man is the head of the woman so is Christ the head of the true believers. Man is the head of the household, its not a sexist thing its just the order of mankind.
And yes, we can know who God is through His word the Bible. God is not any other lifeforms, but he did create all other lifeforms. God is judge
In my world Man and Woman are treated equaly, Homosexuals, Lesbians, Bi-sexuals and Heterosexuals are treated equally and so are Whites, Pinks, Purples, Greens, Black or what ever other colour they are.
GOD is undescribed because no man that we know has seen him in person and is talked about as a Legend not a fact (Adam & Eve are the exceptions).
You cannot believe the Bible or Science or anything unless you have valid proof and have seen it for your self. Don't judge!
I don't know what "world" u think u live in but man and woman are not equals except in the fact that they are both humans. God created an order for mankind and our roles as either men or women are defined by our sex. Homosexuality is an abomination and u making them an "equal" is no different than making someone who practices bestiality or who is a sociopathic killer an equal. Its assnine.
Yes but you can't proof Faith. When peopel start arguments over the Internet or in person about Religion, hating on others and their genders/ethnicity etc... makes them worse then the non believers. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and regardless if you do or don't believe in GOD you shouldn't judge them and be rude....
I am sure GOD wouldn't punish the non believers... especially the ones who help humanity and other lifeforms.
You sure the Hell can prove faith! "Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works. " - James 2:18
You accuse meof starting arguements, thats a blantant lie, people make accusations and questions to me and I respond truthfully. You accuse meof hating on others, I have done no such thing, I hate murder just as much as I hate homosexuality I have vented no such hate to people but what they do
And God very much WILL punish the non believers because they know not God nor are they of God and their fruits are those of disobedience not faith unto righteousness. They exalt what is unclean and disperse that which is, calling man's works holy and despising that which is of God. For that God will surely bring judgment on them.
You can help others all you want that doesn't make you righteous in God's sight. One cannot earn righteousness, it is of God not man.
The judgement is not yours, you shouldn't judge because if it/he/she those exist and all the tales are correct he will punish those who have spread false word and hurt verbally or physical life forms as well.
I do not believe in the GOD that you believe in, I believe in GOD who forgives. You know nothing about God nor do I or anyone, you shouldn't jump to conclusion and saying that which may not be true. Leave GOD out of Science there is no place for you in this topic.
Its not my judgement it is God's judgement. God is Holy and without blame, those works that are not in of Him will be destroyed because God has no part in them. They cannot sustain themselves because their works lead to destruction not life, this is God's judgement on them.
I know plenty about God because He has given us His word the Bible in order that we may know His will, I don't jump to my own conclusions. And Science is nothing but the exploration of God's creation.
@Uaz31 Ahh, yes.. he became a man so he could kill himself in a blood sacrifice to appease himself and vicariously forgive the rest of the world for the vicarious punishment he assigned to all of us, because his creation persuaded his creation to eat another part of his creation. It all makes sense now.
And gays are directly comparable to serial killers.. of course they are! How evil it is to find members of the same sex attactive. What monsters! Hurry the rapture!
Actually no, Christ gave his life up as an illustration of what He had already done for the true believers before the foundation of the world. He was murderered but He gave His life, it was not suicide. The greatest love is to lay down ones life for another. Sin entered the world because of disobedience not "eating one another" , separation from God is the result as God is without sin.
Some serial killers are born with sociopathic behavior, my arguement was it doesnt make it ok.
@Uaz31 The fact you don't like someone's behaviour also doesn't make it wrong. Neither does what some bronze-age goat-herders thought.
Your god still required a blood sacrifice to forgive (and to allay a punishment inflicted upon us vicariously) - that is the fundamental tenet of your religion. I don't see how it can be interpreted any other way.
To address your comment above on light and the stars:
No, behavior has nothing to do with it, its just scientific facts.
No, God doesn't require a blood sacrafice to forgive. You should try reading the whole Bible instead of pulling it out of context to make it say what you want it to. Old Testament law (old covenant), God was making Israel a illustration of the kingdom of God on Earth, the animal sacrafices were pointing to the Christ who was the real sacrafice for our sins. Christ already came and were under the New Covenant now
Star light does take a long time to travel to us but that doesn't mean the stars are that old. When God created the stars, He brought the light from them here, He didn't have to wait for it to reach Earth. God created the heavens, remember? And as far as we know all the stars in the sky no longer even exist anymore as the light hasn't reached us yet.
@Uaz31 I take it you didn't watch the video. How amazing of god to create these things just to give us a pretty sky for half the time! How good to create hundreds of billions of redundant stars in our galaxy. How good of him to create hundreds of billions of redundant galaxies. And to do it in just a fraction of the time it took him to create this single planet (according to genesis).
You are aware Occam isn't a rival brand for Gillette, aren't you?
@Uaz31 again people are giving god a gender, sorry but I'm not religious, I'm a philosopher, one that believes in his/hers own thinking (although I'm a boy...) but if god is so merciful, then why did he kill the Egyptian children in the story of Moses (although you'll probably say i was the angel of death and not him) and of course humans have to have the power to send other animals to death, I'm not saying you should believe in what I believe, I'm saying you should open your eyes a little...
Okay so, all light has a source, that being the stars. Let us assume a stationary position for a given star taken at time = 0 to simplify the problem (i.e. not moving toward or away). Now since our given star is 10 million light years away, and since light can only travel 1 light year / year, why is it we can see a star 10 million light years away? Because it's light has been traveling for 10 million years.
@Uaz31find u quite weird for some1 who call himself religious, always insulting others for their believes. U'r not suppose to forgive?You keep telling that evolution is fearie tale,so I have a question for u:What about greek's gods, sumerian's gods, muslim's god, fearie tale? These tales are made from man? But,not your god,this one is real! NOw, try to see as I see it.Imagine if over the years, ppl begin to think Santa Claus is real and begin to kill for him and his teaching,how would u see them
@barrakkooda lol sounds like your typical bible thumper..super closed minded..get um..i always do, and they can never give ya a intelligent answer...just quote's..lmao..
Radiometric dating works when you use the correct system on the correct objects. If you radio-date things willy nilly you're going to screw things up because you're not looking at the right atoms.
I know you're a creationist but you should at the very least research your claims before deciding they are correct. Please see the youtube video "Radiometric Dating is Flawed!! Really?? How Old IS the Earth?" for a brief introduction to the topic.
Wrong. Radiometric dating is fairly accurate within a few thousand years but not past known history being approximately 3,000 B.C. as it relies on a assumption that all things have remained constant and thats what makes it not factual but hypothetical.
I can only assume you failed to watch the video so I will take the liberty to explain it to you. Various radio isotopes can be found in various materials we are not limited to carbon-14, but have a wide variety of elements to examine, the half-lives of which are all known to us. This allows us to radiometricly date inorganic material such as rock strata to within an acceptable margin of error.
Also you can at the very least read the wikipedia article on it. If you can be so bothered.
I can more than assume that you did not acknowledge my previous comment. I know very well how radiometric dating works and the many different elements that are dated, that was not the issue. The issue is the fact that one must ASSUME that those elements have continued at the same rate of decay which is not verifiable and therefore is nothing more than a ASSUMPTION.
The radiometric dating is fairly accurate within known history, outside of that it is complete guesswork. Its interesting to note that we have recently discovered the year of Noah's flood being 4,990 B.C. which would be 7,000 years ago. That being so, radiometric dating would have a timeline of 7,000 years to work within not millions of years. So their whole work is based on a preconceived ideology that the world is billions of years old, which simply an assumption
It also depends on what type of radiometric dating one is using. Many times the dating is off by many many years not just a few hundred. A recent example is the testing of newly formed rock from the Mt Saint Helens eruption which was tested as being millions of years old but this was newly formed from the volcano only 30 years old. These wide margin errors occur all the time in carbon dating.
Im not in a church, and your just as bias as the next person. Also these are responses to YOUR bias and comments directed at me not the other way around.
I suggest you take your own advice and keep your opinions to yourself if you don't wish to be corrected or indoctrinate others with your own ideology.
You don't respect no one opinions but your own. You know why there is some much fight over religion? Because of people like you, when "God" sees that i am sure he won't be so glad whether you believe him or don't. And why are you talking about correction? You don't even understand the simple principal of science because you and your magic book say otherwise...
I lost all hope to religion because of you, but still Bible has some clever quotes.
WoW.... thats the most stupid remark i have heard... It takes more then 13,000 years for Planets and all matter to form. It has been scientifically proved Earth has been here for more then 4 billion years. See Gods wrong there... maybe they lost count how many years have passed.
And you are correct mankind thinks they have all the answer but they don't, totally agree with you there ;) But 99% of your comments are pretty much bogus. (I like bible it has great quotes but this...)
No sorry, thats a complete lie on your part. Science has not proven anything about the age of the Earth aside from the fact that it is indeed a young earth of only thousands of years, they simply speculate because they don't know. But we can know thru God's word what He has done and the timeframe for events that took place.
They don't know but you and Bible do? I am not sure if you are dumb, brainwashed, mentally unstable or simply trolling but ok. Earth has been here for longer then 13,000 year and if you can't believe that you are simply a MORON. Believing in God and fighting with others, denying their beliefs won't get you to so called "heaven".
You think God will takes someone who murders but still believes in him to Heaven over a non believer who those good? I don't think so...
No, they don't know, radiometric dating is flawed as its not reliable past known history being approximately 3000 BC. They assume decay rates remained constant for millions and billions of years, its absurd. Stars and galaxies have never been observed to form, they presume all this is happening and because of the distance of the light they assume that its taking millions if not billions of years to happen. Thats not scientific fact that is hypothesis.
Bible is God's word so yes we can know but the Bible is not a being so no it doesn't "know" as you suggest, it is God who "knows". I think you might want to take a look in the mirror as u seem to be what u imply me to be. No, Earth has not been here longer than 13,000 years, there is no evidence for that at all. I can give u plenty of evidence for a young earth of only thousands of years and its all scientific, comets for one would have burnt themselves up long ago.
Not sure what your referring to with your "believing in God and fighting with others" comment. Your the only one here calling names and attempting to belittle others. It really reflects on who you yourself are in the names u call others as well as a poor vocabulary and little patience. Im just stating facts, if you can't handle that then perhaps you should stop responding.
Yes, God took the thief on the cross to Heaven and nobody is good but God. Jesus ate with sinners.
Calling "people" names? I don't recall calling people mean words. I have only said that YOU are a Moron for what you have so far wrote on this video. I understand why you come here and discuss religion when this is a Scientific video. The only reason is that you like to annoy people over the internet and get some weird satisfaction from it.
You believe in God and "respect" how everything else works yet you fight with other people about their beliefs saying that they are wrong.
1:33 we began to wonder does everyone have a blackhole? yes....yes they do
TheSeeker008 2 months ago in playlist space
@TheSeeker008 hahahaah!
killswitch3ngag3 1 month ago
"Does everyone have a black hole?" lol
TurboTsunami19 2 months ago
to infinityyyy and beyond!!!
eCedie 3 months ago 7
bangis..ahaha
anje05 5 months ago
Hubble is really great for the scientists
humzayunas2 6 months ago
i have a black hole
TheSisko1 7 months ago
LOL I was clearing my throat when he said "it had a giant, feeding black hole", and it sounded like "it had a giant, fucking black hole" XD I had to back it up and re-listen to it
Shadowdragon1134666 8 months ago
I would imagine if photons follow this hole's gravity's curvature, and their speed does not alter (light speed) in our measuring, than the interrelation between space and time does not change to our observing (still sound logical, or not?), BUT, we know that 'time' delays closer to gravity,so apart from collapsing 3D objects, before entering, photons wouldn't be decelerating within the time component relative to the space component.. But would in our measuring.As it is in our measuring in outer
Joke9972 8 months ago
@Joke9972 Where are you going? Are you talking about the Holographic Principle of Leonard Susskind??
martfp88 5 months ago
@martfp88 Never heard of Leonard Susskind, sounds interesting
Joke9972 5 months ago
I have no reason to hate you... oh wait I believe something different to you and my beliefs are right, your's are wrong; let's all start a rambling debate over youtube comments.
murphownsyou 8 months ago
Can someone please explain to me how a star can collapse under it's own weight to form a black hole? I don't understand how it can become a black hole instead of just an incredibly dense ball of matter?
NotBadYeah 9 months ago
@BBCWorldwide This Star Trek music is really distracting me from the content of the video. How am I supposed to hear what these guys are saying when I'm prompted to start thinking about Kirk making out with alien babes or the ship being flooded with tribbles?
Choose different music next time, guys. Preferably something that doesn't deliver such a significant Pavlovian response (e.g. theme songs from popular television shows).
IntarwebUser 9 months ago
I ain't even scared of no black holes.
flimflabber 10 months ago
DEAR VIEWERS, FOR ASTONISHING FACTS ABOUT SPACE, JUST TYPE IN THE SEARCHING BOX:
Quran and Science
SEVEN PARTS!
gulfland 10 months ago
these virgin scientists giving those black holes stupid names with numbers like "na546" and "kt465" fuck that.
give them actual names like what we do to the hurricanes. :P
halomaste70 11 months ago
@halomaste70 agree with that, I think it would be better for knowing them.
aquecedoroleo 8 months ago
While your looking through your tiny telescopes at the stars... Jesus Christ is bursting into the scene! wake up people before its too late!
savana906 11 months ago
These stupid advertisements make me want to get sucked into a black hole.
oldestogle89 11 months ago
People such as Uaz31 make me want to totally not believe in God. Not that i am 100% religious but believing wont make me loose on nothing. What have i and you got to loose?
Still i take science very seriously and love everything about technology and space. But really 13,000 years? You are that stupid?
CyphenPhsyX 11 months ago
@CyphenPhsyX
There is plenty of evidence for a young earth of only thousands of years and no evidence for a millions of years old Universe yet ignorant people like yourself ignore the facts to believe in your fairy tale of a billion years old Universe. Sorry guy but it didn't happen like that. We didn't evolve from primal goo. Also proper english sentence would be "Are you..." not "You are that..." and u call me stupid...lol.
Uaz31 11 months ago
@STORMCAT06
Why the fuck are you getting mad? He is totally correct...
CyphenPhsyX 11 months ago
i saw heart of blackhole and now i can predict the past
GoodFellatoo 11 months ago
Uranus is a black hole
knockdoun 1 year ago 22
I like how everytime they say black hole its all epic xD
starsinger195 1 year ago
only butt hole =/
FaizSpiegel 1 year ago
Black Holes are fucking gateways to parallel Universes!
IgorMorais666 1 year ago
@IgorMorais666 have you been there or did you just figured that out using logic and physics ?
Savyn333 1 year ago
@Savyn333 Bro, I've been watching some physicists talking about black holes, and some of them believe that the space and time broken in a black holes leads to a parallel universe, well if they say that who am I to disagree?
IgorMorais666 1 year ago
The Bible says 'Love thy neighbor', not 'Attack thy neighbor for there beliefs.' We are human, we are a single species with many minds that think differently. I believe in God, but I doubt He is happy with the fighting going on between scientists and religious people. How do you think He would feel? It's His place to judge, not yours. Believe whatever you want, its you life, your body mind and soul, and in the end, we all answer for our deeds. Live and let live.
Darke Jackal~
Waroftheworlds112 1 year ago
Were we not created with curiosity, the brain power to think for ourselves? Why, answer me this, why can't people just believe what they want to believe? When we do that, amazing things happen, new things are created and we grow closer together as a species, but with this war between religion and science going on, we grow farther and farther apart. We live on this tiny planet in a vast expanse of the unknown. So why make our lives more difficult argueing over such trivial things?
Waroftheworlds112 1 year ago
Why are people arguing of God on a video about Black Holes? It's getting annoying to scroll down to try and read someone's theroy about the Universe, only to find "god sux!!1!" "no! you sux n00b!" Really now? Can we not get along? Do we have the ability to believe what we want? In religion, who is the only judge, who is the only one to say what is right and wrong? Where in the bible does it say, "Slay those who study the outer reaches." We are humans, we have free will.
Waroftheworlds112 1 year ago
@barrakkoooda if religion have one and only God... as we konow there is three of them islam, judaism and christianity... then that is the same God. The only defference is in how they praise Him.
Tespestijaa 1 year ago
click hubble telescope's dark discoveries video
see world of warcraft cataclysm commercial
FFFFFUUUUUCK DRAGONS ARE REAL?!
OfTehMedia 1 year ago
i love it when he says: "supermassiveblackhole"
Masterofvideo457 1 year ago
i would get sucked by a black hole ,white hole , brown hole i dont care
1zrofan 1 year ago
i suppose you can discover anything if you throw enough tax payers dollars at it WHAT ABOUT THIS PLANET SQUARE EYED WANKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mandoggydogg 1 year ago
DO WE HAVE ONE!?!?!?! AHHHHHHHH!!!!!!
twistedkeys1 1 year ago
hubble finnaly saw the mommaland nasty
oopsihitsyou 1 year ago
does everyone have a black hole LOL everyONE she shouldve gone "...everything.." that wouldve made sense LMFAO
Ivin3690 1 year ago
randy suesakul
rsuesakul 1 year ago
"does everyone has a black hole?" hahahahaha
nasty!
riccovieira 1 year ago 69
@riccovieira u suck at language arts u must b hispanic its "does every1 HAVE a black hole"
BIackPride01 1 year ago
@BIackPride01 "you must be hispanic"......that's racism! I pity you....
riccovieira 1 year ago
@riccovieira i love to look into those blackholes there firmly warm and has a raw surface almost amkes u wanna throw something inside :D
Escarion1983 1 year ago
@Escarion1983 ew!.lol
riccovieira 1 year ago
@riccovieira No, Some Have A Long Stick. xD
CocoaDoodle 9 months ago
@riccovieira I do.
O.O
D00ml0rdKazzak 8 months ago
@riccovieira lmao, funniest thing ever
76special 8 months ago
@riccovieira ...obviously you're not an educated spick...
Lifter85 7 months ago
@riccovieira I've seen a black hole around Ur Anus!
xenoepist 7 months ago
@Berniebays it does eventually, when it explodes, right? or did i misunderstand the last 500vids? :P
TheOneRebornElyrize 1 year ago
even our own galaxy has 1?
RyanandJackpro1 1 year ago
@RyanandJackpro1 Yeap
Canus91 1 year ago
@RyanandJackpro1 Essentially, every galaxy would have one, if these theories are correct. The galaxy wouldn't necessarily be eaten up by the black hole, rather than rotate around it. The farther away you get from gravity, the less of a force it has. This means that we really wouldn't get sucked up into our galaxies black hole, the black hole is just rotating our galaxy. However, when you get near that thing, it would just.... spaghetti-fy anything that gets near it.
SC2Joint 1 year ago
@RyanandJackpro1 All do.
Lavere2009 1 year ago
@Berniebays I know its isn't an actual hole. But I don't agree with you that it destroys matter!!. where is the law of conservation of energy gone then ?! I Have doubts and did you ask the question. Does black holes get heavier when it feeds on planets and galaxies ? and knowing that we have many sizes of those black holes it might confirm the fact the it stores the energy not destroying it!!
BestThought 1 year ago
@BestThought it doesnt destroy the matter, it shoots it back out really really really really fast as radiation and other energies
tdubzdub13 1 year ago
anyone thinks that black holes are just giant recycling machine for producing new planets and stars and even galaxies ?
BestThought 1 year ago
@BestThought Yeah i would agree with that.
Star makers
Electrorules 1 year ago
@BestThought No I don't think so. Black holes are dark and negative. Black holes is perhaps hell out in space.
affep96 1 year ago
your mom is in every galaxy....how sad.
waybeforetheplatypus 1 year ago
I had too many Guinness last night now I have a Supermassive Blackhole ; )
983reece 1 year ago
nothing is bigger than god JIHAD
alkharussi76 1 year ago
@alkharussi76 hahahahahahahaahaahah not A GOD
naistuke 1 year ago
u people arent learing anyything
twiddly11 1 year ago
@WKaliberr it's supermassive?
marse78ro 1 year ago
wow
tastesfunny1 1 year ago
it's mean that in our milky way was also has Supermassive Black hole
taufan8687 1 year ago
@taufan8687 Cool story bro'
SpitzerYB 1 year ago
wait guys...can black holes just start randomly? This is startin to freakin me out...
theshadowpkr 1 year ago
maybe we are already in a huge black hole - There is dark matter everywhere all around us right now.
MSA6001 1 year ago
There is one at the center of our galaxy too... and we are probably close to entering into event horizon.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 nah lol not by far after like few billion ears maybe
hokalol 1 year ago
A few billion ears? The Universe has only been here 13,000 years, if it was years your referring to. 11,013 BC to be exact. Thats directly from God's word the Bible.
Fact is we have no idea how long that would take, our entire galaxy could be enveloped in it next year and we wouldn't even see it coming until the last moment.
Mankind thinks it always has all the answers but it doesn't. Fact is we know very little of the forces that govern our Universe.
Uaz31 1 year ago
oh please shut up. "the universe has only been here 13,000 years.
It's a proven fact that humans (not mentioning dinosaurs and alot of other organisms) have been around alot longer than that.
Save your bs for church and don't go around and whine your biassed church speak between a scientific youtube vid. People are watching this because its interesting and most likely true, go and indoctrinate someone else.
Dalaryna 1 year ago
It's not a "proven fact" its actually quiet the opposite. Dino fossils are only one of many evidence for a flood of only a few thousand years not millions of billions. Those fossils would not even still be around in the ground if the world was only 1 million years old let alone billions of years.
On the same topic there are recent discoveries of dinosaur soft tissue found in dino bone within the fossils themselves proving they are in fact only thousand of years old at maximum.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 but there were also bones found over 230 million year's old
btw about the bones you noticed: that's probably where legend's about dragons began
like people saw a T-Rex or something and in shock started imagining shit like Fire Breath and go running to the village telling everybody
hokalol 1 year ago
@hokalol
Prove it, you can't. So therefore your only making assuptions. Radiometric dating is not accurate past known history being 3,000 Before Christ and it also is based on another assumption that all things have continued as they are, which is not known. So your opion really doesn't hold as any kind of "fact".
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Wrong
nilbud 1 year ago
@Uaz31
You also can't prove bible is 100% correct, regardless of what you have been told you have not been to witness everything that has happened during last "13,000" years...
CyphenPhsyX 11 months ago
@CyphenPhsyX
We can know God is correct yes. Plenty of evidence for that, why He gave us His word the Bible.
Uaz31 11 months ago
@hokalol
Also I would like to point out that soft tissue from within dino fossils has been found several times, last time in 2009. And the fact that fossil remains would not still be in earth after 1 million let alone 65 million years. The earth would have swallowed them up by now.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Wrong
nilbud 1 year ago
@Uaz31
You realize how long it takes for a lifeform to form? Thousands years of evolution, sure you may not believe in evolution but cmon.. Really you believe in magic "man" from sky creating the world? You think god created so many planets but only cares about humans? Why would he created other planets if he was only going to take care of this one....
You utter nonsense is simply proving your are arrogant brainwashed simpleton.
CyphenPhsyX 11 months ago
@CyphenPhsyX
Wrong. Evilution is not scientifically possible, its a religion not a science. Micro variations do not equal macro evilution in animals. God is not a "magic man in the sky" He is God, He only became a man to demonstrate His sacrafice and mercy. God says why He created the Heavens in the Bible, they are for signs and seasons and to show His majesty, nothing more than that. He didn't create other life on them, we are the crown of His creation, created in His image.
Uaz31 11 months ago
@Uaz31 Evolution itself is very much scientifically possible and has been observed. Multiple times. Evolution is simply change through generations due to surroundings. Artificial evolution is called breeding, and it's how we got the bulldog. We created environments where one characteristic (really weird faces) survived, and other characteristics didn't. Aka, evolution. It happens to be artificial, but it is still very much evolution. Natural evolution is the thing in question... sorta.
vantarinitel 9 months ago
@vantarinitel
" Evolution itself is very much scientifically possible and has been observed. "
Wrong. Thats a false statement and you know it and so does the scientific community. Yall try to sidestep the issue by claiming micro variations equals macro evilution but thats simply not the case. Variations do happen within a perticular kind of animal but never from one animal to another kind of animal. Never has that been observed nor is it even biologically possible, and yet you believe it.
Uaz31 9 months ago
@Uaz31 Look at a wolf. Do you see the wolf? Now look at a bulldog. We're not talking micro variations. We're talking quite large variations. It has been observed multiple times, what you have is terror that because evolution happens, you're somehow less of a person. Ya know what? You're right. You're quite insignificant. We all are. If aliens observed Earth, according to some definitions of 'ruling', they wouldn't know if ants or humans ruled.
vantarinitel 9 months ago
@vantarinitel
Wolves and bulldogs are both canines, thats an example of micro variation not macro evilution, as is every example evilutionists proclaim as micro. Its all doggie DNA thats why one can interbreed most canines because they are all the same kind of animal. Theres this thing you probably don't know about but animal breeders pick out certain animals to develop those perticular traits, farmers do the same with our food crops. Thats why we have such variety in the dog, we induced it.
Uaz31 9 months ago
@hokalol
Also I would like to point out that soft tissue from within dino fossils has been found several times, last time in 2009. And the fact that fossil remains would not still be in earth after 1 million let alone 65 million years. The earth would have swallowed them up by noww
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Dude you know what a fossil is?
Its a bone in which the cellular structure has been replaced with quartz so it doesnt decay so it can stay intact forever but fossilising is only possible in rare kind's of soil
and that is why there arent that many bone's left.
hokalol 1 year ago
@hokalol
Yes, I know what a fossil is. Fossilizing is possible in any type of soil that doesn't matter what matters is that it is rapidly buried and has a water source.
Arn't many bones left? lol. Fossils are not bones. Altho they have discovered dinosaur bone and soft tissue within fossilized dino bone.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@hokalol
Also, fossils do not stay intact forever. They are rock and subject to the same conditions the rest of the earth is and the Earth is constantly being turned within. After just 1 million years any fossils on the surface would have been completely consumed by the earth into magma. So no they can only be thousands of years old.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Dude idk what you are talking there but it has been proven that the oldest bone's found are over 230 million years old...
hokalol 1 year ago
@hokalol
First of all they are not bones they are rock sediments, thats what fossils are. There is no way to date any fossil that far back because there is no way to accurately date anything past known history being 3,000 BC. Radiometric dating is not reliable, especially not past known history as it suggests all things have remained as they are now for huge amounts of time and there is no way to verify that. Its all guess work.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 it may not be reliable but i dont think there would be 230 million years error
hokalol 1 year ago
@hokalol
Radiometric dating assumes all things have remains constant and that nothing has changed. Going back a few thousand years that can be somewhat accurate to date but we are talking hundreds of thousands and even millions of years and to make assumptions like that and call them fact is ludicris. Its not science its pseudo science when you call an assumption a fact, thats a fact.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 well where is you fact in saying universe is 13,000 your old sounds like real bs to me because the light from the 60% of stars we can see in the sky wouldnt have reached earth in 13,000 years.
hokalol 1 year ago
@hokalol
The Bible is where I get 13,000 years since creation. I suggest "Adam when?" from Familyradio dott comm online literature for reference.
As far as the light from the stars, that light was already here. Therefore it didn't need to travel to get here. He said, "let there be light" not ok, now I have to wait 500 billions years for light to reach here.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 right bible...and where is the fact that wat bible says is true?
hokalol 1 year ago
@hokalol
Absolute truths is the fact that what the Bible says is true. This is one of many reasons we can know the Bible is the word of God.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 makes no sence but.. sure
hokalol 1 year ago
That is circular reasoning. That's not a valid form of argument. Also the bible is subjective not objective, leaving it open to interpretation. That alone destroys this argument.
Grospoliner 1 year ago
Science has illustrated conclusively that light travels at a set speed through space again please research your claims properly.
Grospoliner 1 year ago
@Grospoliner
Oh I have Grospoliner, what is it your confused about? Yes, light travels at the speed of light, I never said it did not.
Uaz31 1 year ago
Right. Okay. Lets review your statement. "..that light was already here." This means that the light would have had to instantaenously travel from its source to the required position in space. This means the light would have moved faster than it possibly could have to reach this staging point so that it could. Do you see the failure in logic here?
Distance traveled = rate of travel * travel time.
Grospoliner 1 year ago
@Grospoliner
The light would not of had to "travel" at all, God created the Heavens, Earth and the light from the stars. Im saying that the light from stars was already here when they were created, it never traveled to get here so no it did not move faster than the speed of light. Bible says God "divided the light from the darkness", He said also, "let there be light" not ok now I will wait 500 billion years for light to arrive here.
Uaz31 1 year ago
Evidently you have no understanding of the fundamental physical princples which govern reality. That you choose to remain ingorant to them is something I lament.
Grospoliner 1 year ago
@Grospoliner
I have much understanding of the funamental physical principles which govern reality but it is obvious to me you do not. Your statement is a reflection of what you are in fact guilty of but I must add that you are not mearly ignorant but willfully ignorant as you know I am correct but choose to deny reality.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Is this the extent of what you have to say? Simply plugging your ears and going "I know you are but what am I"? I should expect as much. I question why you even bother to interact with people who hold opposing view points.
Enjoy your fairy tales, though it galls me to know you're doing so flagrantly while sitting in front of a machine that people like me helped create.
Grospoliner 1 year ago
@Grospoliner
Yes, Gros this is the extent of what I have to say thats why it ends with a period. Unless there is something else you need me to elaborate on. You can repeat your childlike mantras all you want Im really outgrown for that and not interested.
You enjoy your fairy tales too, evilution is a funny one at that. People like you created my computer? lol. Ya you keep telling yourself that, whatever makes yourself feel all important I guess. bye.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 I thought we had finished 2 days ago. Ironic you say I use a mantra, as that is a spiriturality term and I reject the supernatural. As for the computer, yes scientists and engineers created it. Not that you care but I attended engineering school and graduate with a Bacholer's. For your information being an engineer doesn't make me feel important, very little does as it serves me no purpose.
Grospoliner 1 year ago
@Uaz31 All I have to do to realize that my existance is a tiny and meaningless thing is to look up into the night sky and see the countless billions of stars which comprise the vast and uncompromising universe. Any sort of self importance I could ever feel is nothing but a delusion and I recognize it as such. Maybe you will learn this for yourself one day.
Grospoliner 1 year ago
@Grospoliner
Oh I have Gros, Im a Christian remember? Only part your missing is giving credit to God part in your deep thought there. Yes, we are nothing but God is something.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 The universe is beyond even God's control.
Grospoliner 1 year ago
@Uaz31 god has a role on politics and capitalism/economics. When it comes to science and it's as important as Frodo Baggins..
Carekka77 1 year ago
@Carekka77 Yay Frodo! 2000 years ago, we had a dark age. Stories were lost, one story survived, with a symbol that people used for support in crappy lives. In the Renaissance, stories were revived, but 2000 years later, there are buildings with crosses on them. Another dark age hits. Stories are lost. One story with a symbol survives, and the pattern repeats. A new Renaissance, stories are revived, but 2000 years later, we have buildings with the One Ring on them."
vantarinitel 9 months ago
@Uaz31
God dosn't have a genre so why are you calling it "he"? Infact our simple human minds don't understand the principal of God, we don't know what God actually is. God can be energy, the universe, big bang, all human society or any other living lifeforms...
Also why are you so judgemental? Aren't you suppose to forgive and honor/respect other peoples believes?
Nah you no religious you are simply wanting a E-War...
CyphenPhsyX 11 months ago
@CyphenPhsyX
No God doesn't have a genre but He became a man in order to demonstrate His sacrafice and mercy on mankind. He became a man because of the order of mankind that just as the man is the head of the woman so is Christ the head of the true believers. Man is the head of the household, its not a sexist thing its just the order of mankind.
And yes, we can know who God is through His word the Bible. God is not any other lifeforms, but he did create all other lifeforms. God is judge
Uaz31 11 months ago
@Uaz31
In my world Man and Woman are treated equaly, Homosexuals, Lesbians, Bi-sexuals and Heterosexuals are treated equally and so are Whites, Pinks, Purples, Greens, Black or what ever other colour they are.
GOD is undescribed because no man that we know has seen him in person and is talked about as a Legend not a fact (Adam & Eve are the exceptions).
You cannot believe the Bible or Science or anything unless you have valid proof and have seen it for your self. Don't judge!
CyphenPhsyX 11 months ago
@CyphenPhsyX
I don't know what "world" u think u live in but man and woman are not equals except in the fact that they are both humans. God created an order for mankind and our roles as either men or women are defined by our sex. Homosexuality is an abomination and u making them an "equal" is no different than making someone who practices bestiality or who is a sociopathic killer an equal. Its assnine.
Uaz31 11 months ago
@CyphenPhsyX
God is described in His word the Bible, we have His word. Proof is in the faith and faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God.
Uaz31 11 months ago
@Uaz31
Yes but you can't proof Faith. When peopel start arguments over the Internet or in person about Religion, hating on others and their genders/ethnicity etc... makes them worse then the non believers. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and regardless if you do or don't believe in GOD you shouldn't judge them and be rude....
I am sure GOD wouldn't punish the non believers... especially the ones who help humanity and other lifeforms.
PEACE
CyphenPhsyX 11 months ago
@CyphenPhsyX
You sure the Hell can prove faith! "Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works. " - James 2:18
You accuse meof starting arguements, thats a blantant lie, people make accusations and questions to me and I respond truthfully. You accuse meof hating on others, I have done no such thing, I hate murder just as much as I hate homosexuality I have vented no such hate to people but what they do
Uaz31 11 months ago
@CyphenPhsyX
And God very much WILL punish the non believers because they know not God nor are they of God and their fruits are those of disobedience not faith unto righteousness. They exalt what is unclean and disperse that which is, calling man's works holy and despising that which is of God. For that God will surely bring judgment on them.
You can help others all you want that doesn't make you righteous in God's sight. One cannot earn righteousness, it is of God not man.
Uaz31 11 months ago
@Uaz31
The judgement is not yours, you shouldn't judge because if it/he/she those exist and all the tales are correct he will punish those who have spread false word and hurt verbally or physical life forms as well.
I do not believe in the GOD that you believe in, I believe in GOD who forgives. You know nothing about God nor do I or anyone, you shouldn't jump to conclusion and saying that which may not be true. Leave GOD out of Science there is no place for you in this topic.
CyphenPhsyX 11 months ago
@CyphenPhsyX
Its not my judgement it is God's judgement. God is Holy and without blame, those works that are not in of Him will be destroyed because God has no part in them. They cannot sustain themselves because their works lead to destruction not life, this is God's judgement on them.
I know plenty about God because He has given us His word the Bible in order that we may know His will, I don't jump to my own conclusions. And Science is nothing but the exploration of God's creation.
Uaz31 11 months ago
@Uaz31 Ahh, yes.. he became a man so he could kill himself in a blood sacrifice to appease himself and vicariously forgive the rest of the world for the vicarious punishment he assigned to all of us, because his creation persuaded his creation to eat another part of his creation. It all makes sense now.
And gays are directly comparable to serial killers.. of course they are! How evil it is to find members of the same sex attactive. What monsters! Hurry the rapture!
Arsehole
lo2enge 11 months ago
@lo2enge
Actually no, Christ gave his life up as an illustration of what He had already done for the true believers before the foundation of the world. He was murderered but He gave His life, it was not suicide. The greatest love is to lay down ones life for another. Sin entered the world because of disobedience not "eating one another" , separation from God is the result as God is without sin.
Some serial killers are born with sociopathic behavior, my arguement was it doesnt make it ok.
Uaz31 11 months ago
@Uaz31 The fact you don't like someone's behaviour also doesn't make it wrong. Neither does what some bronze-age goat-herders thought.
Your god still required a blood sacrifice to forgive (and to allay a punishment inflicted upon us vicariously) - that is the fundamental tenet of your religion. I don't see how it can be interpreted any other way.
To address your comment above on light and the stars:
watch?v=JcQTCoY3wYQ
lo2enge 11 months ago
@lo2enge
No, behavior has nothing to do with it, its just scientific facts.
No, God doesn't require a blood sacrafice to forgive. You should try reading the whole Bible instead of pulling it out of context to make it say what you want it to. Old Testament law (old covenant), God was making Israel a illustration of the kingdom of God on Earth, the animal sacrafices were pointing to the Christ who was the real sacrafice for our sins. Christ already came and were under the New Covenant now
Uaz31 11 months ago
@lo2enge
Star light does take a long time to travel to us but that doesn't mean the stars are that old. When God created the stars, He brought the light from them here, He didn't have to wait for it to reach Earth. God created the heavens, remember? And as far as we know all the stars in the sky no longer even exist anymore as the light hasn't reached us yet.
Uaz31 11 months ago
@Uaz31 I take it you didn't watch the video. How amazing of god to create these things just to give us a pretty sky for half the time! How good to create hundreds of billions of redundant stars in our galaxy. How good of him to create hundreds of billions of redundant galaxies. And to do it in just a fraction of the time it took him to create this single planet (according to genesis).
You are aware Occam isn't a rival brand for Gillette, aren't you?
lo2enge 11 months ago
@Uaz31 again people are giving god a gender, sorry but I'm not religious, I'm a philosopher, one that believes in his/hers own thinking (although I'm a boy...) but if god is so merciful, then why did he kill the Egyptian children in the story of Moses (although you'll probably say i was the angel of death and not him) and of course humans have to have the power to send other animals to death, I'm not saying you should believe in what I believe, I'm saying you should open your eyes a little...
MrBlazekid4 10 months ago
Okay so, all light has a source, that being the stars. Let us assume a stationary position for a given star taken at time = 0 to simplify the problem (i.e. not moving toward or away). Now since our given star is 10 million light years away, and since light can only travel 1 light year / year, why is it we can see a star 10 million light years away? Because it's light has been traveling for 10 million years.
Grospoliner 1 year ago
@Uaz31 You ridiculous gullible fool.
nilbud 1 year ago
@nilbud
Your the one with a Nixon button for a portrait
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31find u quite weird for some1 who call himself religious, always insulting others for their believes. U'r not suppose to forgive?You keep telling that evolution is fearie tale,so I have a question for u:What about greek's gods, sumerian's gods, muslim's god, fearie tale? These tales are made from man? But,not your god,this one is real! NOw, try to see as I see it.Imagine if over the years, ppl begin to think Santa Claus is real and begin to kill for him and his teaching,how would u see them
barrakkooda 1 year ago 31
@barrakkooda Elves?
owner876 1 year ago
@barrakkooda lol sounds like your typical bible thumper..super closed minded..get um..i always do, and they can never give ya a intelligent answer...just quote's..lmao..
ltuomela 1 year ago
@ltuomela
How is he being close minded? Tell me how? Learn to read and actually figure what he is trying to say you Moron.
CyphenPhsyX 11 months ago
Radiometric dating works when you use the correct system on the correct objects. If you radio-date things willy nilly you're going to screw things up because you're not looking at the right atoms.
I know you're a creationist but you should at the very least research your claims before deciding they are correct. Please see the youtube video "Radiometric Dating is Flawed!! Really?? How Old IS the Earth?" for a brief introduction to the topic.
Grospoliner 1 year ago
@Grospoliner
Wrong. Radiometric dating is fairly accurate within a few thousand years but not past known history being approximately 3,000 B.C. as it relies on a assumption that all things have remained constant and thats what makes it not factual but hypothetical.
Uaz31 1 year ago
I can only assume you failed to watch the video so I will take the liberty to explain it to you. Various radio isotopes can be found in various materials we are not limited to carbon-14, but have a wide variety of elements to examine, the half-lives of which are all known to us. This allows us to radiometricly date inorganic material such as rock strata to within an acceptable margin of error.
Also you can at the very least read the wikipedia article on it. If you can be so bothered.
Grospoliner 1 year ago
@Grospoliner
I can more than assume that you did not acknowledge my previous comment. I know very well how radiometric dating works and the many different elements that are dated, that was not the issue. The issue is the fact that one must ASSUME that those elements have continued at the same rate of decay which is not verifiable and therefore is nothing more than a ASSUMPTION.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Grospoliner
The radiometric dating is fairly accurate within known history, outside of that it is complete guesswork. Its interesting to note that we have recently discovered the year of Noah's flood being 4,990 B.C. which would be 7,000 years ago. That being so, radiometric dating would have a timeline of 7,000 years to work within not millions of years. So their whole work is based on a preconceived ideology that the world is billions of years old, which simply an assumption
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Grospoliner
It also depends on what type of radiometric dating one is using. Many times the dating is off by many many years not just a few hundred. A recent example is the testing of newly formed rock from the Mt Saint Helens eruption which was tested as being millions of years old but this was newly formed from the volcano only 30 years old. These wide margin errors occur all the time in carbon dating.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Wrong
nilbud 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Wrong
nilbud 1 year ago
Comment removed
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Ha hahaha haa so utterly stupidly wrong.
nilbud 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Wrong
nilbud 1 year ago
@Uaz31
Source?
CyphenPhsyX 11 months ago
Im not in a church, and your just as bias as the next person. Also these are responses to YOUR bias and comments directed at me not the other way around.
I suggest you take your own advice and keep your opinions to yourself if you don't wish to be corrected or indoctrinate others with your own ideology.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31
You don't respect no one opinions but your own. You know why there is some much fight over religion? Because of people like you, when "God" sees that i am sure he won't be so glad whether you believe him or don't. And why are you talking about correction? You don't even understand the simple principal of science because you and your magic book say otherwise...
I lost all hope to religion because of you, but still Bible has some clever quotes.
CyphenPhsyX 11 months ago
@Uaz31 You fucking imbecile.
nilbud 1 year ago
@Uaz31
WoW.... thats the most stupid remark i have heard... It takes more then 13,000 years for Planets and all matter to form. It has been scientifically proved Earth has been here for more then 4 billion years. See Gods wrong there... maybe they lost count how many years have passed.
And you are correct mankind thinks they have all the answer but they don't, totally agree with you there ;) But 99% of your comments are pretty much bogus. (I like bible it has great quotes but this...)
CyphenPhsyX 11 months ago
@CyphenPhsyX
No sorry, thats a complete lie on your part. Science has not proven anything about the age of the Earth aside from the fact that it is indeed a young earth of only thousands of years, they simply speculate because they don't know. But we can know thru God's word what He has done and the timeframe for events that took place.
Uaz31 11 months ago
@Uaz31
They don't know but you and Bible do? I am not sure if you are dumb, brainwashed, mentally unstable or simply trolling but ok. Earth has been here for longer then 13,000 year and if you can't believe that you are simply a MORON. Believing in God and fighting with others, denying their beliefs won't get you to so called "heaven".
You think God will takes someone who murders but still believes in him to Heaven over a non believer who those good? I don't think so...
CyphenPhsyX 11 months ago
@CyphenPhsyX
No, they don't know, radiometric dating is flawed as its not reliable past known history being approximately 3000 BC. They assume decay rates remained constant for millions and billions of years, its absurd. Stars and galaxies have never been observed to form, they presume all this is happening and because of the distance of the light they assume that its taking millions if not billions of years to happen. Thats not scientific fact that is hypothesis.
Uaz31 11 months ago
@CyphenPhsyX
Bible is God's word so yes we can know but the Bible is not a being so no it doesn't "know" as you suggest, it is God who "knows". I think you might want to take a look in the mirror as u seem to be what u imply me to be. No, Earth has not been here longer than 13,000 years, there is no evidence for that at all. I can give u plenty of evidence for a young earth of only thousands of years and its all scientific, comets for one would have burnt themselves up long ago.
Uaz31 11 months ago
@CyphenPhsyX
Not sure what your referring to with your "believing in God and fighting with others" comment. Your the only one here calling names and attempting to belittle others. It really reflects on who you yourself are in the names u call others as well as a poor vocabulary and little patience. Im just stating facts, if you can't handle that then perhaps you should stop responding.
Yes, God took the thief on the cross to Heaven and nobody is good but God. Jesus ate with sinners.
Uaz31 11 months ago
@Uaz31
Calling "people" names? I don't recall calling people mean words. I have only said that YOU are a Moron for what you have so far wrote on this video. I understand why you come here and discuss religion when this is a Scientific video. The only reason is that you like to annoy people over the internet and get some weird satisfaction from it.
You believe in God and "respect" how everything else works yet you fight with other people about their beliefs saying that they are wrong.
CyphenPhsyX 11 months ago
@Uaz31
- and you are right because you have the "ultimate" source of "reliable" information which is the Bible? Really... cmon.
CyphenPhsyX 11 months ago