I think that the Clintons' ability to stay in power is underestimated. Obama will never be offered the vp position because it's already taken. Yes, by Bill a.k.a former president. If Hilary resigns at end of term(s), 4 or 8 years, hubby becomes president for 2 more years and Hillary of course, first lady again. Then of course, future Senator Chelsea will be at the door steps by then.
True enough. What is also underestimated is the degree to which Hillary as a nominee would unify the repuglicans far more than McCain ever could. Obama has a chance to beat McCain. Hillary doesn't in my view.
That's not an accurate way to look at it. It is how many districts did each candidate win and how many delegates. It is not "winner take all" so any talk on either side of who won what states is disingenuous.
Consider this: Obama's campaign team is smart, well-organized, and from all accounts, they work together very harmoniously. Also by all accounts, Hillary's campaign has made major strategy mistakes, is more disorganized, and has a lot of in-fighting and back-stabbing. Now what makes anyone think that these two campaigns is anything but a preview of what each respective team would bring to the Whitehouse? Which model would you prefer?
I think that the Clintons' ability to stay in power is underestimated. Obama will never be offered the vp position because it's already taken. Yes, by Bill a.k.a former president. If Hilary resigns at end of term(s), 4 or 8 years, hubby becomes president for 2 more years and Hillary of course, first lady again. Then of course, future Senator Chelsea will be at the door steps by then.
kentutube 3 years ago
True enough. What is also underestimated is the degree to which Hillary as a nominee would unify the repuglicans far more than McCain ever could. Obama has a chance to beat McCain. Hillary doesn't in my view.
gadgetman00000 3 years ago
Have you looked at Obama's website and then at Hillary's? That should say it all for organization.
happy1s2 4 years ago
And your point is? How is a web designer's design indicative of anything about the campaign's organization?
gadgetman00000 4 years ago
How many IDAHO's does it take to make a California?
happy1s2 4 years ago
That's not an accurate way to look at it. It is how many districts did each candidate win and how many delegates. It is not "winner take all" so any talk on either side of who won what states is disingenuous.
gadgetman00000 4 years ago
Consider this: Obama's campaign team is smart, well-organized, and from all accounts, they work together very harmoniously. Also by all accounts, Hillary's campaign has made major strategy mistakes, is more disorganized, and has a lot of in-fighting and back-stabbing. Now what makes anyone think that these two campaigns is anything but a preview of what each respective team would bring to the Whitehouse? Which model would you prefer?
gadgetman00000 4 years ago