Added: 1 year ago
From: CapitanArgentario
Views: 29,819
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • जय गुरुदेव ॐ

  • I have a version on my iPod that sounds almost exactly like this except with more instrumentation. I have no idea where that version came from. Does anyone have an idea?

  • @cubfan369 Is it possibly the version from Past Masters? If it's slower than this, it'll be the version from the original Let It Be album.

  • @akeel456 I checked and it is not the version from Past Masters. To the ear, it seems to be the exact same speed as this, and in fact the exact same recording except with more instrumentation. I've never heard it anywhere else and I'm still totally perplexed.

  • @cubfan369 Well the only released variations are the Past Masters, Let It Be, Let It Be... Naked and Anthology 2 versions. I reckon it's the original Let It Be version you're referring to, since it's the most common and the vocals are quite similar to the untrained ear.

  • its like John singing in your living room! Great!

  • @kiddymama12 r u single :D jk jk

  • incredibile come questa canzone riesca a cullarti e a farti sentire in pace

  • where do you find that pictures?

  • This is absolutely beautiful...

  • Grandissima canzone !!!!!!!

  • just curious, why is the album called let it be naked?  do they mean unedited cuts of songs or what do they mean?

  • @Deathsquad49 Many people including McCartney had actually hated the editing done by Phil Spector which is called the Wall of Sound technique seeing how some songs had choirs and orchestras and other things. So what this album is remove all of the editing to its most raw form which is why it is called "Let It Be... Naked"

  • OMG! It sounds waaaaay better than the original version of the song! I prefer this one obviously, although it's the same song, it sounds much cleaner!!!!!! THANK U 4 SHARING!!! :D

  • Listening to this makes me feel like I'm not even wearing headphones. and the sound is just...there

  • Who needs Spector

  • I LOVE the Let It Be Naked sooooo much!! I really prefer to the original. All the stuff is just so raw and pure Beatles, i love it!!!!!!!!

  • Beatles,beatlez,beatles,beatle­s,beatles....Aaaargh!!!!!!!! CAN'T STOP LISTENING!!!

  • @kiddymama12 Hi I looove them too!!!! And I'm a 12 year old girl;)

  • If you wanna get laid, play this song on guitar and sing it to a girl.

    Damn this is a GREAT song.

  • I Beatles? Semplicemente la mia vita! *-*

  • en mi opinion, la mejor version de esta cancion. lejos.

  • this album should have been named Get Back as it was originally intended back before 70.

  • @ruukaoz Probably better it stuck with the Let it Be name - the album the Beatles originally intended as 'Get Back' never saw the light of day - there is a "Glyn Johns final masters" bootleg a friend gave me which is as close as it gets to what could have been the "Get Back" album .. no Phil Spector, and no historical revisionism. I like Let it Be...Naked, but it now makes it a more polished album and not the live performance driven album they originally were shooting for.

  • finally found the album it came in

  • i love this song 

  • I really love this version of the song, Thank you very much, Emmanuel!

    You've been so kind and generous ;)

    Rod

  • @PopRockArt

    This is my favorite version of this song too, the version of Let it Be is a bit slow and the one in Past Masters is faster, this version is in the original speed... and without a doubt is the best.

  • i love the beatles...thanks very much friend..the beatles forever...

  • @LadyNikita10

    De nada Mika!! :)

  • Tu es vraiment un grand fan des Beatles :)

    L♥

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more