everybody only say shit. the touch down was bad, very high v/s, but it was EARLIER than it was supposed to be. the guy lander at 1000ft mark, when real pilots land the 747 at almost 2000ft mark... you guys only comment shit
yes the landing was hard but no you're wrong about the landing area. he landed right on the piano keys. the placement was perfect but yes the landing was a bit hard.
well apparently you're not!! the landing isn't good because touchdown is obviously too hard, and he's absolutely not aligned with the centerlines... am I the only one to see it???
I really like this video, especially the scenary. I got FS X but the runway doesn't show up because the airport is closed down now. Landing there is more fun than the new airport. Does anyone know any good add-ons for Hong Kong? Also....dude what is the background music you are using there?
It really depends on how it's configured. If you properly configure your plane in FS to have all the right reactions to flight controls, it can be good. Out of thought, I've never used x plane. Do they have virtual cockpits. That's one way how fs can be good it their cockpits...i'm not siding with either. it really depends.
depends, if u have a great graphics card get fsx, because if your graphic card isn't great the frame rates will be terrible, in that case you should get fs2004.
I would like to know about the difference between Flight Simulator X and Flight Simulator 2004. Could anyone reply to me ASAP?Btw, I own a Microsoft Flight Simulator 2002 Edition and I intend to gwet another Flight Simulator. And if you could, please tell me which FS is better. Thank you =D
If you want graphics, get FS. If, like me, you are a pilot, then you want flight realism...only X-plane has realistic flight profile. Only X-plane has been certified by the Federal Aviation Administration for use in flight training towards Instrument, Commercial and Airline Transport.
HarrisburgJetCenter dot com. Go look at the school and their simulator. Take note of these aviation copmpanies using X-Plane:
FlightMotion dot com
Scaled dot com
CarterCopter dot com
If FX is so good, why dont these aviation companies use it? Why did Burt Rutan of Scaled Composites choose X-Plane to train his pilots? Why didnt he choose FSX? By the way....I am a pilot.
Doesn't matter, certain Flight Simulator Add-ons are based on the real thing. These include accurate flight dynamics, and functions. Take the PSS 777 professional, for example.
hi this scenery is actually outdated, u can get a much prettier one, from flytampa
called flytampa kaittak
computechlan 1 year ago
please can i know where you got this beautiful scenery
plok97 1 year ago
is this fly tampa scenery ?
KAC1510 2 years ago
Does anyone know the music?
azacool 2 years ago
is that fdc live cockpit announcments ?
xboxlivegstar66 3 years ago
it s cool, just that it lag wait too much. record everything at 1/2 speed and then speed it up by x2 in your editing software =D
Bizuland 3 years ago
u probably came in too fast...kepping your final approach speed to abou 165knots would be just nice
steinwaykid 3 years ago
bad scenery
fs9dude 3 years ago
bad landing u landed first with the left gear
mokalokajaja 3 years ago
thats ho how you land into hong kong you make a sharp right turn
fs9dude 3 years ago
Is that a IFly 747-400?
AirlinePilotStuart 3 years ago
i donno which one it is but the ifly 747-400 is amazing
fs9dude 3 years ago
it is PMDG747-400
bufo111 3 years ago
pretty late touchdown
otherwise pretty good
mahoolywazit 3 years ago
everybody only say shit. the touch down was bad, very high v/s, but it was EARLIER than it was supposed to be. the guy lander at 1000ft mark, when real pilots land the 747 at almost 2000ft mark... you guys only comment shit
JoseAiltonCunha 3 years ago
you're the one commenting shit it a very good video + 1000ft mark, 2000ft mark? wht r u some kai tak geek person?
FS2004looney 2 years ago
yeap....that guy is out of control
NSRacerMods 2 years ago
yes the landing was hard but no you're wrong about the landing area. he landed right on the piano keys. the placement was perfect but yes the landing was a bit hard.
lunchtimepass 2 years ago
you came in 2 fast as you can see the nosewheel buried into the tarmac
jas47679 3 years ago
I;d like to see your landing..
chris08712 3 years ago
great approach, great landing, 10/10!
cricketamskysports 3 years ago
needs higher altitude
omgzown 3 years ago
is this the default scenery for the kai tak airport in fs2004?
craig9006 3 years ago
No, this is Hong Kong 2004 ;)
adrianrw1994 3 years ago
300 and more are not usuallu ADF freq? Correct me if im wrong!
psvvac2 4 years ago
it can go below 300
marko071988 3 years ago
i try to program the runway frequency into the nav 1 and 2 fields but i can't get to 377.0 any help? please!
jimbotrains 4 years ago
noob, 377 is the ndb frequency. There is no runway frequency, just the IGS frequency, which is 111,9.
marko071988 3 years ago
Well if you could stop moving the camera in Spot Plane View...!!!
SSSCLimitedTrademark 4 years ago
Brilliant Flying with not much runway left!!!
funkysam123 4 years ago
great approach/hard touch down
very great!!
kpt4roger 4 years ago
brilliant landing! and i'm hard to impress!
5 star nd subsription
cellist12345 4 years ago
well apparently you're not!! the landing isn't good because touchdown is obviously too hard, and he's absolutely not aligned with the centerlines... am I the only one to see it???
marko071988 3 years ago
it was a hard landing
bata9955 3 years ago
bit of a hard touchdown
CrazyDuck159 4 years ago
nice cathy pacific! May i ask where did u get it?
lionstar2222 4 years ago
name of song please
NotZezima 4 years ago
The background music is really annoying!
gazer88 4 years ago
awesome
ja7eem 4 years ago
Nice, but LOL, music does not go well with it, especially with the GPWS.
choidj 4 years ago
I really like this video, especially the scenary. I got FS X but the runway doesn't show up because the airport is closed down now. Landing there is more fun than the new airport. Does anyone know any good add-ons for Hong Kong? Also....dude what is the background music you are using there?
djmoe20001 4 years ago
IN FSX THERE IS KAI TAK!!!!!! its called
Hong Kong(old) VHHX
tek5828 4 years ago
and how did u make it go like "500""400" and stuff like that????
mumisanmartin 4 years ago
its does it automatically
A69GOLDHAWK 4 years ago
what is the game called just flight simulator 2004 or flight simulator 2004 a centry of flight??? plz answer
mumisanmartin 4 years ago
Theyre same m8!
Matty231 4 years ago
PMDG? iFly? POSKY?
And what scenery?
BG7YKTI 4 years ago
PMDG 747-400 and "flightsoft hong kong 2004".
computechlan 4 years ago
Could anybody help me to get AI traffic back to Kai Tak please.. I try new afcad file, remake many traffic routs to VHHX and still nothing.
HanzPrague 4 years ago
Where can i get that AWESOME HONG KONG SCENERY .. Please tell me !
Nice Video !!
pilotswen 4 years ago
This is "flightsoft hong kong 2004".
computechlan 4 years ago
hong kong city beatiful
burak767 4 years ago
how did u get graphic from? nice view
leon0079876 4 years ago
That video kicked ash!
datroof18 4 years ago
what flaps stick up when you land the plane?
noobschoolbus37 4 years ago
Spoilers
flamingbunnyrabbits 4 years ago
lol they're called spoilers. you can activate them using the default "?" key.
they come in great handy =p
drmike469 4 years ago
It really depends on how it's configured. If you properly configure your plane in FS to have all the right reactions to flight controls, it can be good. Out of thought, I've never used x plane. Do they have virtual cockpits. That's one way how fs can be good it their cockpits...i'm not siding with either. it really depends.
airsoftmafia 4 years ago
depends, if u have a great graphics card get fsx, because if your graphic card isn't great the frame rates will be terrible, in that case you should get fs2004.
chicolover1 4 years ago
Yes FSX is worth your 50 bucks. really nice landing but like the other said, wierd camera shots indeed ;)
Bizuland 4 years ago
I would like to know about the difference between Flight Simulator X and Flight Simulator 2004. Could anyone reply to me ASAP?Btw, I own a Microsoft Flight Simulator 2002 Edition and I intend to gwet another Flight Simulator. And if you could, please tell me which FS is better. Thank you =D
ViolinIdiot 4 years ago
Neither. Get X-Plane. It's the only FAA certified desktop simulator. Even Burt Rutan uses it.
Jumpa31 4 years ago
tbh i'd get FS because the X-plane graphics aint up to my standards and FS has all the best add-ons =D
Dudeboy4000 4 years ago
If you want graphics, get FS. If, like me, you are a pilot, then you want flight realism...only X-plane has realistic flight profile. Only X-plane has been certified by the Federal Aviation Administration for use in flight training towards Instrument, Commercial and Airline Transport.
Jumpa31 4 years ago
Microsoft Flight Simulator is better than X-Plane and X-Plane is not FAA certified.
tylermannison 4 years ago
x-plane dot com/FTD dot html
Jumpa31 4 years ago
I don't want X-plane
tylermannison 4 years ago
HarrisburgJetCenter dot com. Go look at the school and their simulator. Take note of these aviation copmpanies using X-Plane:
FlightMotion dot com
Scaled dot com
CarterCopter dot com
If FX is so good, why dont these aviation companies use it? Why did Burt Rutan of Scaled Composites choose X-Plane to train his pilots? Why didnt he choose FSX? By the way....I am a pilot.
Jumpa31 4 years ago
I'm pretty sure its the other way around.
OriginalAtomicSheep 4 years ago
Doesn't matter, certain Flight Simulator Add-ons are based on the real thing. These include accurate flight dynamics, and functions. Take the PSS 777 professional, for example.
772pilot 4 years ago
WOW great
emiratespilot 5 years ago
Nice B-HOY ! Where did You get one?
VHOJB 5 years ago
yeah dude your camera angles suck
UnitedDEAGLES 5 years ago
what is the kaitak scenery???and How did get it?order?or download.and where
CPn1Rvana 5 years ago
to bad it didnt crash
KILLERONROAD 5 years ago
NICE! cathay pacific, i flew on one of those planes
uzumakinaruto01 5 years ago
NICE! cathay pacific, i flew on one of those planes
uzumakinaruto01 5 years ago
Bad Camera position ;P but good Landing !
LH4384 5 years ago