Added: 4 years ago
From: TXCANY
Views: 155,375
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (362)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Tsagia it was a few years into the war that the Union started using blacks in the fighting

  • inteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeence

  • the north had slaves too

  • @ChanielDang Yeah they did. Are you stupid? They were offered many things to fight for the south. Freedom, pillaging, money. Sad, but true.

  • looks good. america's bloodiest war, no wonder why, america is a world power obviously if we fight each other all of us will be f***ed up

  • black people fought for the confederacy? lol

  • @ASDFUIL lol

  • @ASDFUIL you didn't know that?

  • 0:39 CAPTAIN PRICE

  • Its interesting that the music used in this trailer wasn't used until the second game in the Activision Civil War series. I wonder if they were planning on using it in the first as well.

  • @carolinainfidel Actually, quoting a relevant historical figure from the period and then anaylizing that quote is the approved scholalry metodology of historiography. Plagraisim would be if, for example, I told you I wrote Confederate Emancipation, rather then give Bruce Levine credit for it. And by the by, I was just looking for a video demonstrating the differences between the Xbox 360 and PS2 versions of the game, your comment was just something I stumbled on.

    An apples are ok.

  • I wish there was a revolutionary war game for Xbox 360 and PS3 instead of just PC because barley anyone plays PC

  • im up for vietnam games!

  • which one is better? nation divided or secreat missions?

  • 0:47 owned!!!

  • call of duty: civil war. ha that would suck. 3 kill streak and u get sum sort of cannon barrage? imagine? then 5 kills and the wright bros fly in and shoot up the place?

    i want a vietnam game, ww1 game, civil war game and maby a korean war game

  • @KMEECHY hahaha u just made my day

  • Why did i not know this existed, oh well do know. There is way to many WW2 games, like virginiaskater said, thank god Call Of Doody is going to Modern Warfare. Why not more Veitnam games, they have the potential to be very good, with helicopter's, tank's, hamburger hill's.

  • this game is pretty good :D

  • the diffeculty on making civil war games was the first person prob. to make the game feel more realistic they would have to use realistic guns and reload time. reload time in the civil war (with the exception of the repeater) was a pain in the ass. which is why people choose to make ww2 more than civil/revolution. i for one am more fond of the ww2 theme

  • WW2 games are not boring. That is the time period of which true modern warfare came from.

  • Call of Duty: Civil Warfare, your 11 kill streak is a gatling gun mounted on a train

  • @EmuMaster564 It would suck, just like every other call of duty. I'm sure you would have F-16s and nukes in a call of duty civil war game.

  • @zombiehunter96 But I want my crank gatling gun on a train!

  • does this game have multiplayer?

  • GO UNION!

  • Well peoeple who slaved was the british we have britsh in U.S.A the followed the kings rules,No one was bad,We stoped slavery becuase America is not a race American is not a race it means freedom,The south only wanted whites,Some Black people help the south becuase they like their family,But America was a place for freedom there is no race Native Americans is a race of taned people wich are spanish now I think,North wants freedom for every one,South wanted a race for Americans.

  • The war ended before slaves were able to fight in the confederacy and lincoln didn't appear on a southern ballot the north had a way bigger pop. and the war started as trying to preserve the union besides slavery is bad . Duh

  • @CageMayhem

    The Confederates weren't the bad guys. Nobody was.

  • They had it at Games Stop for $12 bucks. I was considering getting it. Looks kinda fun

  • They got to make a FPS Revolution game where you can play as B or A

  • @TheBillbot exactly what i was thinking, the only problem is that most of the battles were very boring and controlled and not like the common duck and cover style of combat, and the load times would be extremly long, but i would still love to see one

  • they should make a cowboys and indians game...

  • looks cool

  • no this isnt the war between the British and Americans

  • Can you play as either side? I don't want to play as the white supremacist union.

  • @Luigi84289 wow, dont you mean rebels? union fought for african american freedom. lol

  • @CageMayhem

    Not at all, actually. The slaves weren't freed for any morale reasons against it. The war was for Southern independence. North were the "bad guys."

  • @Zay721 okay even if the south did win, slaves would still be slaves and not free. South bad Union Good guys

  • @Cage you do realize people in the North had slaves right? As well as the neutral states...you cant 'what if' things as well.. you dont know what could or could not happen. The South didnt want just slavery...do you find it far that a president could have been elected without appearing on a Southern ballot? Cause Lincoln was..that is fair right?..

  • @Zay721 the south wanted to keep there slaves. the only way that was possible if they joined together and fought the union.

  • you mean confederate?

  • @Luigi84289

    Confederate is generally accepted as the white supremacist side. Though only the richest could afford slaves, and few beat them and malnourished them as is always thought. Would you put a dent in your new Mercedes? Besides, black people fought in the Confederacy. White supremacy wasn't very common.

  • @Zay721 That's exactly why I'd fight in their army. I'm not a white supramcist I'm a southern nationalist, black, white, doesn't matter if you are from the south you're a southerner. Slavery was ending in America. The slaveholding minority would have eventually been forced to give up their slaves Our region should be run by us.

  • @Luigi84289 is a senator not usually from the state is the senator of?

  • sure, few actually did it, but do you know how many slaves that "few" owned at a time?

  • @Zay721 Yes, actually. White Supremacy was common in the North, actually. Abraham Lincoln was one of them.

  • @ParathonFounder resaeach wtf you say goof.

  • @googlefx Abraham Lincoln once said "There is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality," he strongly favored colonization of the blacks. He was disgusted by the thought of amalgamation of black and white races. In response to Stephen A. Douglas, he concluded that, "the separation of the races is the only perfect preventative of amalgamation."

  • @Zay721 And after the war, the KKK was more prominent in the North than it was in the South in areas like Indiana, Illinois etc.

  • @Zay721 wow ur smart

  • Hello im from the south thought the same thing. Until i heard this story Once there was a young black Child about five years old who every day would go out side >>>when the slavers werent watching of cours""" and tried to learn to read so he could read his bible...when his " master" found out P.S I HATE SLAVERY!!!!!!! he burned his eyes out... that stuff DID happen... though you are right not many white people could afford slaves... and many confederates were against it..

  • Infact the real reson for the Civil war to begin with was to ceceed from the united states... which the confedracy had every right of doing...I like president Lincoln and all but, if you can give me one good reason why he wasnt just like that King George dude who tried to hold america back ill be happy. Think of it as someone says something bad about your mom at school. the bell to go home rings. so you pack up to go home. but the princepal says you dont have the right to do that.

  • @Zay721

    White supremacy was very common since the south thought of themselves as aristocrats. The reconstruction period, jim crow laws, and kkk and its following in the south show that the south felt that blacks were inferior to them and should stay that way, or else.

    also comparing a slave to a Mercedes to a slave is a false analogy since a slave can fight back or has the possibility to fight back.. a better analogy would be, would you beat your dog

    and yes, some people very much would

  • @frenchy036

    It's not as common as thought. And the North was just as white supremest as the South. The KKK began as a social club for Southern Civil War veterans and later changed into what it is now known as. The KKK as we know it wasn't made just for blacks. They also did the same things to wife beaters, Jews, et cetera. Jim Crow Laws can't be pinned on just the South. That was the country. The decisions of segregation and separate but equal schools and so on are decisions of the country.

  • @frenchy036

    It's not as common as thought. And the North was just as white supremest as the South. The KKK began as a social club for Southern Civil War veterans and later changed into what it is now known as. The KKK as we know it wasn't made just for blacks. They also did the same things to wife beaters, Jews, et cetera. Jim Crow Laws can't be pinned on just the South. That was the country. The decisions of segregation and separate but equal schools and so on are decisions of the country.

  • @frenchy036

    It's not as common as thought. And the North was just as white supremest as the South. The KKK began as a social club for Southern Civil War veterans and later changed into what it is now known as. The KKK as we know it wasn't made just for blacks. They also did the same things to wife beaters, Jews, et cetera. Jim Crow Laws can't be pinned on just the South. That was the country. The decisions of segregation and separate but equal schools and so on are decisions of the country.

  • @Zay721 its generally accepted as that but that doesnt mean its true

  • @alexselby97 well said :)

  • @Zay721

    Not many of the african americans fought for the confederacy, they were used as cooks and servants.

  • @Zay721 There is a great new book out titled: GETTYSBURG… OTHER TIMES

    It’s about two soldiers and a nurse from other times meeting in Gettysburg on the first day of the great battle. People that are on this post would love it.

    Check out the book at my YouTube profile (GETTYSBURGbook) or search Amazon.

    Cheers...

  • Comment removed

  • @Zay721 @Zay721 Well Vice-President Alexander Stephen's did compel the border states to join the Rebellion in a letter saying "To preserve a nation based upon slavery and white supremacy." (David Blight. The Civil War and Reconstruction Era, 1845-1877: The Election of 1860. (Audio Recording (Yale University Open Course, 2008). That isn't to say that the North did not also suffer from racial bigotry, but to say that White Supremacy did not exist in the antbellum South lacks qualification.

  • @Zay721 Furthermore, according to Bruce Levine's Confederate Emancipation, very few Blacks fought for the Confederacy as they were only legally allowed to by 1865 (although limited numbers did join irregular guerrilla bands) and doing so did not guarantee their freedom, despite the urgings of General Robert E Lee (and Patrick Cleburne before his death at the Battle of Franklin) to guarantee freedom as a condition of service. Your contention, I believe, is based on post-bellum romanticism.

  • @DarthMercanto He closed his account.

  • @KingOfClubz100 I'm sorry who closed there account?

  • @DarthMercanto Zay721

  • @KingOfClubz100 Oh I see. That's probably a good thing, looking back my comments come of as a bit condescending...

  • @DarthMercanto It's ok, happens to all of us.

  • @Zay721 Yes it was.. it was very common.

    Stop trying to down play the racism as it was "hardly there". I HATE when people do that.

    Disrespecting blacks in public in the south was no big deal, people got fucking hanged just for looking at white women.

  • @Zay721 Well said.Confederates weren't these "racist monsters" Hollywood or modern history presents them as,at least that's my opinion.There were plenty of racists up in the north too.It was just that the South was more rich than the North while some of the northern states were having problems with unemployment and all that.

    In the end the Confederates just wanted to seperate and the Union was like "OH NOOO!YOU ARE EVIL RACISTS!WE WILL STOP YOU!GO BLACKS,ATTACK FIRST!"

  • the exploshins arnt for like 80 more years and the transactions r really slow a cannon fires 2 sec later the wheeles move not worth spendin $40 on

  • I LOVE THIS GAME

  • don't waste your money on this one. i'm a huge civil war buff and this blows : (

  • @hareball527 You suck

  • i have this.. it ruined my collection it sucks ass!

  • I got to have this, I am on the confederate side

  • @SouthernSoldier16 Me too, Only because I am related to Robert E. Lee

  • @coolcatevan9  bullshit

  • Looks pretty damn good. I'm gonna get this

  • i think that they should make a spartan game thats off he chain

  • yeah tht would awsome XD

  • haha yeah. an like a legit one. like assassins creed 2. only with more gore

  • good idea history channel, but ur games just suck compared to the real shit x)

  • Not really, most cover WW II Games.

  • Yes theay did that you watch was a puckel gun a early machingun.

    Theay use it in Europe 1750 or early 1800.

  • i hate nation divied

  • looks like a cool game, the civil war is one of the most exeiting war chapters.

    well that what i think =)

    even do how sad for the two irish(and more) regiments who fougt eace other at fredricksburg

  • Alot of people don't know this but this game surprisingly ran on the call of duty 2 engine.

  • Well the only thing I didn't like about this game was the

    AI, it sucked, your teammates were running targets, so were your enemy

    No variety of gameplay in missions

    Dialogue

    Lack of online play

    Anyway it was pretty cool

  • can this game go online

  • They had. :P

  • Dude, that's not bolt action, that's a breech loading repeating rifle, they did have one in the civil war

  • It's always sad to see a nation at war. Especially if it's at war with ITSELF.

  • THIS GAME IS GOOD i can say that :)

  • this game didn't seem so bad when i saw it...but what i really questioned was how they used the muskets. did they change the reload? lol.. but whatever. is this game any good?

  • ehh...i wouldnt consider buying it but renting it since it lacks the support of online play ps2 and 360 version r both good

  • i guess it depends on the gamer. i love this game.

  • ya me too i also liked the secret weapons of the civil war game they recently did on 360

  • me too

    I dont understand why they had such a poor reception

    anyways is the first one as good as the second one?

  • is this game worth renting?

  • I know. ww2 games are sooo boring. they should come out with more vietnam games. or revolutionary war games.

  • @virginiaskater well COD 7 or whatever you wanna call it is about Vietnam. And the Revolutionary War? lol idk i don't think running around with a musket is gonna be fun unless the developers create a future mode where you can get an M16 or something and mow em all down XD

  • @OnAstick641 if they make a revolution cod, instead of uav you get a pigeon

    "our carrier pigeon is up!"

  • @0BornofDesire0 good idea but the guns would basically suck but wouldnt hurt to play it

  • @0BornofDesire0 enemy spy hot air ballon inbound!

  • @virginiaskater Some ww2 games are pretty good. Brothers in arms hells highway is awesome. Also no, vietnam games are meant to be moody and atmosphereic and a good story. No cod game will do that. Out of all the things shellshock 2 did wrong it got the atmosphere right.

  • @virginiaskater or a WWI game we dont have ANY game thats WW1

  • @virginiaskater or even more shogun type total war games

  • @virginiaskater how about wwi

  • @virginiaskater  world war 2 is better then vietnam world war 2 games rock!

  • @virginiaskater

    or World War 1 Games

  • Ha ha. You are ignorant. If any state on the West Coast seceded they'd be screwed. It wouldn't matter. None of those states have the economy or resources to survive on their own. Your ass is help up on DC.

  • this game is gay i got it yesterday for the 360 and it can smoke my pole for all i care. --___--

  • yea haha i thought it would be good too

  • this game was hard.all i have is a fucking musket

  • is that good or bad

  • of course thats bad,you only get to use the cannon for like once

  • but still would you recomend i buy it for a cheap price

  • well its good for you to buck up on your history

  • well lets see.......maybe cuz in your in the CIVIL FREAKIN WAR!!!!!!

    geez your an idiot

  • you dont even speak right,faggot

  • "War is man's insanity and inhumanity on parade".

    John Lewis Brooks, circa 6/18/09 at exactly 2:57 PM.

  • fuck you yankees, southern confederacy is where its at

  • why u hating the northeners i am live in the north i dont have southenrs if u all still had slavery than i wont like u

  • "i am live in the north" ??? "i dont have southenrs" what the hell kind of language is that?

  • Go South!!!!

  • the north at the end of the war had repeating rifles (not muskets, like a foreshadow of the bolt action rifle)

  • this game was sorta fun because it was a good change from all of the WW2 games but it got boring after i beat the game

  • screw the south. they lost for a reason

  • no kiddin the North rule go Union!

  • seriously

  • well the civil war yea the south did diserve to lose even tho alot of people think it was all about slavery but anyways there may MAY!!!!!! notice i sayed may be another civil war but this time it will be over probly guns or somthing like that cuz the constitution says we have the right to bear arms so that will piss people off over it if obama bans guns

  • LO L YOU DONT KNOW YOUR SHIT KID.

    there wont be another civil war so stfu

  • psh! youd lose so quick

  • this game is cool,but i just don't understand why 2 people want the south to win. and the ones who said that should be ashamed of yourselves,alot of african americans been held as a slave and got seperated from their families.

  • history channel should continue on their documentaries not video gaming.

  • If this kid knows anything about our country's history is that it was founded so everyone will be equal. And everyone will be equal. Even if the "Southern States" try to become the Confederacy again, the real United States will continue to bring them back together and not let them leave!!

  • can you get this game to pc?

  • yes... but you dont want to its really bad, trust me I played it

  • Does anyone know where all the secret photos and documents are?

  • slavery sucks

  • Master mike: the south were 10000000000 times better shots than you dumb ass fucking yankee pieces of shit the only reason why we lost is because we couldnt keep up with ammunition you asshole why dont you open your eyes and read your fucking history book,piece of shit muther fucker

  • The North also cut off the supply lines to the South; Ammunition and Food. This also had a great deal to do with why we won the War. :] In the end though, can't we all just be happy that we're all one country again? One nation United?

  • haha you say we like you were there but you weren't you just a dumb redneck lol

  • dumb ass.. the south lost cuz grant kept atacking even tho it cost so many men.. ur rly dumb if u thought it was friggn amunition. Lee lost at gettesyburg(i know i spelled it wrong but whatever) any way.. when he lost he lost cuz he was atacking and didnt no the grounds right, this time the union picked the grounds and was defended, it was the oppisite of fredricksburg. i know this cuz we just took a test over this and i got a A hopefully o.O and Shovnarine is complettly right

  • u need to die all u southners cant forgive all u do is get mad beacuse u lost and slavery is gone

  • General Lee surrendered, I didn't

  • I saved my Confederate money. =D

  • The war was nit fought over slavery, and Lincoln was a white supremacist.

    "I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races - that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people......."- Abraham Lincoln

  • the south is the best place to be...

  • the history channel is simply opting for extreme realism, which in all is not that fun

  • if its one thing i know its that the history channel cant make a fully good video game. compare this to shellshock 2 and that game destroys every game history channel has ever made. we need a new company that does these games and who is intelligent and knows how to make a player feel like they are actually there in the fight.

  • Game is horrible, i have it

  • the thing is that its not really correct seeing how everyone runs around crazy....now if u just put him in line as an officer and made it like mount&blade it would be acceptable

  • this game is classic its awesome put u truly in a battle i have seen 12 teamates total

  • Lol i hate this game

  • i am gona get this game and play as a rebel! THE SOUTH WILL RISE AGAIN!!! DEO VINDICE!!!

  • It has been shown by history that "states' rights first" is an ineffective and downright stupid way to govern a nation.

  • the south sucks

  • they should have made this game M so there could be more blood and limbs flying off and stuff so its more real.

  • im on the sealms one its haard.

  • it looks like fable crossed with cod xD

  • This game sucks to be honest. I was expecting big epic battles and all I got was a bunch of missions where you sneak around, behind enemy lines, blowing up shit for seemingly ro reason.

  • you dont just "blow up shit", you shoot and kill things too :)

  • i would buy it if it had ragdoll physics