Added: 5 years ago
From: rsherrill
Views: 64,387
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (217)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Very funny and appropriate, unfortunately things have changed little since HIS presidency. Hope for change is in the people not in government.

  • @lostcause525 And this video is not even exaggeration. G.W. Bush literally played with the world like if it was just some mere beach ball... history will not forget what he did... at least I hope so. :(

  • @lostcause525 And stop ignoring Obama's accomplishments. USA is already starting to go for the better partially because of Obama and because of the time passed. I admit it, Bush also achieved some good things (like tsunami aid in 2004), but they're nothing compared to all the negative things achieved by him.

    And do you know how much time it takes to heal such a catastrophe which Bush left? You can't really expect all change in just 4 years, do you?

  • @lostcause525 Despite HIV, cancer, ALS etc. he also didn't care about the environment. He barely did nothing on it. Instead of controlling pollution, making people's life better, being known for preventing wars, not starting them and making USA's imago better instead of making it terrible he decided to waste nearly 11,5 trillion dollars on blatant BS, burn the rest of it for nothing and show middle finger to the world. The WORST president ever.

  • @lostcause525 Thanks to him for killing civilians in mid east; now worldwide terrorism from radical islamists is reality and hate is just growing between people of different religions and nationalities dividing world apart. G.W. Bush also braked down the research in stem cells and since USA has opportunities to study such things for we could be almost a decade further in stem cell research!

  • @lostcause525 What?!! The mistakes which lead to the 911 attacks were made years ago, but what Bush did to "fix" things was to start a war/colonization against Iraq and Afganistan. Both wars destroyed USA's economy completely leaving it in a huge debt and millions lost their jobs because of this. Now With the fear he created against islam he didn't only take liberties from people around world, but cut the rights down from Americans, too.

  • Maybe, he wasn't the best pres, but he pushed it through what he thought was right. That's what Obama needs. That's what DEMs needs. T

  • @Pradahappy Whaddya mean 'maybe' ...of course he sucked and was one of the worst! He should have been impeached. What he thought was right such an egocentric statement.

  • why do you obama haters talk about socialist shit so much, let me ask you will you give up your SOCIAL security? will you send your children to PRIVATE schools or HOME school them, because you do know that PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE SOCIALIST right? are you NEVER GOING TO TAKE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION? thats socalist too, as how about NEVER DRIVING ON A ROAD NOR WALKING ON IT EITHER? roads are public paid for by the state with ALL OF OUR MONEY, which ... you guessed it, IS SOCALIST... just admit it

  • @kenmabie YOU ARE ALL MAD BECAUSE ITS A BLACK MAN AS THE PRESIDENT, no other reason than that. why arent you mad that bushes tax cuts were only for the extreemly wealthy while all the rest of use got taxed to hell and back? how about his invasion of iraq and the wmds he never found, or his tourtre of humans, or the fact hes a religious zealot who thinks god told him to wage wars... thou shall not kill, i think war falls under that rule am i right? ... yea...bunch of racist fucks

  • @kenmabie You're addressing people who have been kept ignorant for the convenience of the political media which has brainwashed them. It is cult like in its execution, and as somebody who has escaped a cult like organization I can tell you that their minds are trained to reject contrary information through convoluted and twisted bastardizations of logic and rhetoric. Unless your posts were for personal catharsis, you've wasted your time.

  • @Sacredor i am afraid you are right ... i hate this country ... i dont want to live here anymore...

  • No , you got it backwords ..Oboma is the forever a stain on our constitution and Republic...he is the worst president ever...and he has only begun to destroy it ..

  • @SnooperSquirrelFilms To tell you the truth i dont realy know which one is worst, the point is both are war criminals and pupets, now imagine how the next one is gonna look like, cause you can assume its not gonna get better its only gonna get worse. This is the start of American Empire, the new world order that Bush s father keep talking about is starting to look real.

  • @SnooperSquirrelFilms , lol u mad cause a black man is president, why werent you bitching when bush was tourturing people, or how about destroying the economy that obama has to try to rebuild, what about that , i dont hear you bitching about how bush broke everythign , and the person after him had to clean it all up , but it may have been broken so bad that it cant be fixed... you sir are an idiot good day

  • @SnooperSquirrelFilms ...such a stupid statement, which only the fundamentalist right would agree with.

  • He's too stupid be a Dictator, it should have been Cheney

  • This is both sad and funny. Perhaps presidential candidates should have to take batteries of tests (including IQ and MMPI) to prove they are competent to properly serve this constitutional representative republic. They shouldn't just read the teleprompter - programmed by the man or women behind the curtain - who might not even be human - as we know it. I don't hate either George - but I sure wish the Bush years had been a lot different and a lot better. We seem to keep getting sold-out.

  • The retarded cowboy who stole Ameriaca in 2000 grandson of Nazi facilatator Prescott Bush.

  • this video is so metaphoric and true. i just love it

  • u all stupid leftry people when do u

    understand it huh

    how many have 2 die for stupid lefty denial complex

    ITS A REDNECK WORLD U LEFTY JUS SURRENDER HOW MANY BOMBS U LEFTY NEED TILL U FINALLY UNDERSTAND

    HOW A REDNECK ROLLS

    STRAIGHT THROUGH YOU ALWAYS!!!

    PLEASE IN NAME OF HUMANITY

    STUPID LEFTY 

    SURRENDER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Didnt the people who built the Titanic say it was impossible to sink?

    The hull was impossible to breach?

    Im not a structural engineer but when a fully fueled and loaded passenger jet slams into a skyscraper... Im gana be impressed when it stays standing but not surprised when it falls.

  • I did not like George Bush one bit, but he did not want world domination. Believe me, if the USA had wanted colonies and an empire, we would have them already.

  • no....you are stupid and like any other american steretype.

  • Actualy I'm a conservative. Im not completely Spanish I'm half American. You are what makes Americans look bad. If you had any bit of intelligence you would know what Spains national food is.

  • this is so gay if you want to challlenge a government dont do it with idiot animations

  • If you know the reference you'll find this quite funny.

  • It's not even close to Chaplins parody of Hitler!

  • HAAHHAAAHHAAAAHHAAA!

    That's messed up! Leave Bush alone!

    HAAHHAAAHAAH!

  • Chaplin was not commumist nor socalist he was a humanist like I am.

  • but amercians dont believe in humanists so they had to make him the evil imoral communist enemy. they're good at that.

  • Some Americans are Humanist the one with the brains like me.

  • do u really know what communism is about?

  • from a pauper to a multi millionaire

    the embodyment of the american dream... thrown out of america

  • @strangerinwhite just because of interest....what would be wrong if he was a socialist or a communist?

  • @Karudu I'm not say anything wrong with him if he was a socialist or a communist? I'm just pointing out what Sir Charles Spencer Chaplin have said in his own word. If anything as a humanist socialist is okay but communist is to totalitarian just like fascism becuase they only benfit a few not everyone. Having thing too far in the left and right is the problem .If you socialize things to take of people and allow a truly free-market ecomony then without survilliance and militarism then I be :) .

  • @strangerinwhite good answer exactly what I hoped for :)...sorry wasnt implying anything...to be honest I expected a shallow minded...well cold war like story. Yet I think communism is in theory a good idea. At least for the general people it would be fair...unfortunatly it simply doesnt work out with the circumstances we live in. Aswell as the totalitary government....but why do you like totally free market economy. I think the stupified mcdonalds generation showed different. whats your opinion

  • @Karudu A total free-market help the ecomony because if you don't want to pay something if you can get thing cheaper threw another person.Most of the youth seem not to get that what they call a free market economy is really limited with regulation by government isn't truely free.A truely free one make contracts owners and allows consent of sellers and buyers to set the price not goverment.The limit amount of goverment having hands on things to the people need not what they think the people need

  • @strangerinwhite True Socialists/Communists ARE Humanists.. just because this missfits in the eastern corrupted everything the Workingclass-Movemnet stood for, doesn't turn the Idea itself into something bad.

  • @CnCKane Socialists and Communist can be Humanist but so can Captialist,anything that scientific,ethical,democratic and religious can too in the Preface of Humanist Manifesto II, the authors Paul Kurtz and Edwin H. Wilson (1973). The Easteren take on it was corruputed by people like Stalin and Mao who used as a front for Totalitarianism. Totalitarianism is the true enemy of the ideas of Humanism hench Chaplin is a Humanist.

  • @strangerinwhite Accualy Chaplin was a leftist and a humanist.

  • creepy...

  • Wow, that was great even if only 33 seconds long.

    Who made this and when? Is there a longer video, anyone?

    I'm British, so please forgive my ignorance.

  • I love the the Great Dictator by Chaplin! :D Weird tough that he was more or less evicted from the US for "Un-american conduct" or whatever it was... What was so un-american about him? The fact that he said what he meant? So free speech isnt american anymore... good to know... Glad I live in a socialist country where I am allowed to join the commie-party if id like...

  • He spoke out against Nazi Germany, which was an ally of the US before the war.

  • chaplin wad named "Un-american " because he was pro- comunist in 1950

    not because he was anti nazi in 1940/

    and the us wasnt an ally of nazy germany in 1940

  • unofficially, they were. It wasn't official.

  • The capitalist dogs of the US were, though.

  • Not for much longer, if you mean the Britain, your time is numbered, bludger scum

  • Un-American Committe was in 1950's because Joesph MacCarthy an ultra-right jerk. In America you get be a commumist by the way which socialist country you live in ?

  • I live in the Kingdom of Norway, my friend :) Sorry about the sour tone of the first message, but it IS insanely provoking to think that in the 50s in the US you could not be a commie... Otherwise you could be thrown out or hated by all your neighbors... Is that a free country where that is possible?

  • Well histeria cause people inside this country to try to limited freedom time after time but it's never sucessful happens to lasted. How can you country be socalist when it's a kingdom isn't that paradox ?

  • Isnt true freedom about being able to believe in any kind of government? It is a Parliamentary Monarchy. That means the King is the symbolic head of parliament, the church and the armed forces. His only true power is to veto laws that he thinks is against the constitution. And the Storting (Congress) can decide that he is acting against the will of the people and give him a kind of "House arrest". But most people in norway think of him like a kind of father-figure with huge influence on moral.

  • Same thing on the communist side.

  • XD lol very nice reference

  • How this imbecile was never impeached will be forever a stain on our constitution and Republic...he was the worst president ever.

  • @fobbitguy if he ever comes to richmond va, i have plans to place him under citizens arrest and to hand him over to one of the embassys that have the world courts warrent for him to stand trial for war crimes

  • @fobbitguy I used to think that... But then I thought about it, What would you do if one of the essential landmarks of the country was destroyed? Could you handle it? People say he sucked now, because they are caught in the moment. Years from now, people will look back and see what he did and how good of a president he really was, Let's take a look at the job spending our current president has wasted so far...

  • @fobbitguy yet got voted twice!

  • Pretty cool effects. I'm not sure what the point is though. Did we live in a dicatorship? Was that a dicator that left office peacefully in accordance to the Constitution in January? He was a pretty crappy dicator. He didn't even disolve Congress or any of that other cool discator stuff.

  • He did pass the Patriot Act. Legislation... I'm sure all the great dictators would have been proud of.

  • stfu you douche.

  • Your arguement lost all credibility once you used the words ''Black man''. What has his colour got to do with anything? If your a racist, bigot, just come out and say so. What?... does an intelligent black man scare you? Your pathetic!

  • Not at all, dude. There's nothing racist about calling a black man a black man. If you think so then you've got a wrong understanding of racism.

    And speaking about being pathetic... I think that'd be you since you've judged me without merit and jumped to very wrong conclusions. What are you, 12?

  • Ah but you see... you labeled Obama by skin colour and labeled Bush by birth name in the same sentance and defamed Obamas character at the same time by saying he would make Bush look like a Saint. Why use colour to describe one person... who youv'e made it obvious you dislike and a proper the birth name of a white person in the same sentance? Stinks of racism mate! Face it!

  • I see where you're having trouble, though, and wanting to make an issue out of color. Being a Brit, you're used to socialism. We here in the states are being drawn into it by liberal democrats. And there's a huge battle a brewing. Those of us on the right, hate socialists like Obammy... regardless of skin color. So, to offset any and all criticism, socialists will use the race card. As you did.

    You know, during the summer when I get really tan from surfing, I'm darker than many blacks.

  • First of all, your the one been a pussy, disallowing people to post comments on your site, but freely posting insults on others. You into censorship? Sounds a bit communist to me, but thats just my opinion. Secondly... if you would bother to learn about world geography and politics... you would know that calling me British is quite laughable. And thirdly... you brought race into it by referring to Obama as Black. If you hate him regardless of his skin colour... then why bring it up?

  • you know who I hate? Carter....

  • FUCK BUSH!  FUCK HIM!

  • Well done! Chaplin would have indeed approved!

    And I also can't help but sigh. At least now, hopefully, this chapter of our history is over. Maybe the ending will be similar to Chaplin's great speech at the end of the same movie? Well, we can hope and make it so ourselves :)

  • hahaha love it

  • i liked what it said at the bottom while bush was so carelessly dancing people were dieing and such

  • U know....the president don't have the authority to declare war. it was the congress decision . Not his fault and we have captured the mass destructed weapon. Saddam. Only on man and word had killed over 300,000 Iraqi citizen during his ruling time and 1.5 million soldier of both Iran and Iraq died during the 8 years war. Wasn't he the mass destructed weapon?

  • No he didn't. but he did anyways. and yes it was his fault.

  • wut?ok... So.....American asked him to send the troop into Iraq, and he did. Now Troop stuck in there cus US government wouldn't to start a Iraqi civil war(If we pull out all the troop). And we blame him for that? ok tell me, what would u do if you are the president of United State. Better give the right answer than sitting there and blaming boy.

  • And u know I would be more than happy to come home with my family but I really hate to leave unfinished business on my back.

  • No America didn't ask him to send troops there. because america isn't a single voice. It is made up of very different opinions. have you seen the music video for "boom" by system of a down? And i do have friends and family in ,on their way to, or just came back from iraq and some would agree with u and some of them would agree with me. If I was president I wouldn't have started this war to begin with because everytime the Us interferes with another country's affairs we get stuck. IE Vietnam

  • American isn't single voice but it based on the most voted. You might wasn't but most of American. Dude....it's all spread by media. instead of steaming soldier being saved by their armor carrier after some mission they show how we died. Those media just showing u wat they think will attract more viewer. You got to think another way not what just the media showing you.

  • How about Korea? WWI? WWII? you are only using the negative example buddy. And well then tell me how would u respond to the 9/11 if u wouldn't start to hunt down Binladen and his supporter? Talk?

  • Bush have to get approve by congress to go to war and he can over ride it if he want to but he did not have to as all congress vote yes!:)

  • then wth are those liberal complain about ? they voted yes and Bosh had warned Iraq war is not an over night victory.

  • they never found weapons of mass destruction and im sure people living in a desert can build and atomic bomb*sacristy*

  • That mass destruction weapon was Saddam himself, Do u know how many people died just because of him? Not just men, but also women, old people and innocent new born infant.

  • what about Goerge Bush? do you know how many he killed? and no one even said anything . im not with suddam or bush but fuck who kills the innocent

  • First, I want to ask you why don't those "terror-shit" step out and face with us face to face? Second, United State and UN had been blamed for not being there during the up rising of the Kurd lead to exterminate of Kurd. Now when we actually take some action and the whole public turn us into bad guys.

  • well first of all ask yourself, why would someone hate me? hmmm maybe because i did something bad that mad them hate me. and second of all there are no "terrorist" those people you see on tv that the media calls them terrorist are iraqi soldiers that did something about the US and british soldiers treating them like shit and taking their oil. 911 was an inside job and osama and alqaida don't exist. they are enemies in your head

  • Lol wow I just ran into a liberal. Ok here, I've been in Iraq lately. Our troops are trying their best to rebuild this corruption nation. These God damn fucking liberal media using propaganda of troops killing people instead of helping troops to win this war and get back in state as soon as possible. second, if I take 911 as what u say as "inside job" so explain the exploded in Britain, Spain, and very near was the explosion in India, who was it? bunch of FBI or CIA???

  • first of all i want to ask you why were you in iraq and i bet every soldier would say: "for my country". I respect that and i admire the brave soldiers. BUT who was in charge? is the person I hate. 911 was an inside job to blame Muslims for it and have a reason for most Americans to think its ok to kill Muslims or "terrorsits" what the media calls them, even though Iraq had nothing to do with 911. the middle east doesnt hate Americans, they hate George Bush, W. makes it like they hate americans

  • Umm sir...you haven't answer my question. If there wasn't terrorist then who was or were behind those explosion that I have listed.

  • there is a video going around the internet that i have watched and convinced me with logical and scientific facts that 911 was and inside job. please go check it out. I'm sorry i can't pin point exactly where it is because i bumped into it. but in one part of the video, the firefighters said that they heard multipul explosions and that there is no way the fuel in plane could cut the steal holding the building

  • look the entire thing your conspiracy theory is based on is inconsistancies but even if you were an engineer or a pyrotechnic expert (which you are most likely not )the world is so complicated and physical laws fit together so intricatly that you cannot even say maybe the gov did it

  • How does that prove me wrong. And by the way, the physical facts that I provide do not come from me, THEY COME FROM ENGINEERS AND CHEMISTS. Second, there's something called science which proves my points in the argument, and the metal structure of the building have been tested many times. Third we are an advanced society that have the ability to things that are far greater than predicting why the buildings fell.

  • im not saying you are proven wrong but your argument is not factual (factual meaning having an unshakeble base )you know what i think(not really ) i think that muslim terrorists planted extra bombs inside the building so that the building would crumble more easily and kill more people you think it was the united states government who orchestrated it who has more proof ?

  • I was thinking the same about the terrorist planting bombs inside the buildings, but I realized that it would not be possible to sneak in explosives in the building and getting passed all the security in the building, EXCEPT for an authority figure, meaning the government or someone that has access to security department of homeland security. Beside, its a fact that the explosives were responsible because the fire would need lot oxygen and the building is designed to limit oxygen in case of fire

  • thats not true if you can pick a lock you can get past doors we dont know so you beleive whatever you want

  • *TOOOT* wrong. A building can't survive a plane impact. The same thign happend in Amsterdam, when a plane came down on a building. That one also collapsed.

  • *TOOOT* Guess why? The people who built the two buildings said it was impossible. The people who supplied the main structural material, said it was impossible. The people who spent their entire lives studying physics said that it was impossible. There was a building in Spain that was completely on fire for more than 24 hours but did not fall down.

  • (I'll skip the toot) Yes, it was on fire. Yes it was on fire for more then 24 hours. Yes it didn't fall down. But it was only on fire. On 9/11 a plane rammed into the tower. Bang! Big explosion, and then a big fire. The part that took the impact from the explosion collapsed on top of the rest of the building, wich couldn't take that. Oh and the all the people who said it wasn't possible: ever heard of Titanic?

  • The titanic didn't defy basic physics though. Which is apparently what happened on 9/11.

    Oh, and if you're so sure that it was the plane + the fire combination that took both towers down, I'd love to hear your explanation for the perfect free fall collapse of building 7, which funnily enough, wasn't hit by a plane and had fires on only 1 or 2 floors and Larry Silverstein was on camera saying they decided to "pull it".

    Please explain all this to us then.

  • I have never heard of those explosions and why would they want to attack Spain and India?

  • OK sir, I will no longer try to argue with you because you know such nothing. sorry but no offense. The one in Spain in 1987, it was a suicide bomber, killer 21 and wounded 40 on a train. And the one in India was in November, 2008 at Mumbai killed 180 people. Both of them was on CNN, BBC, Foxnews, ABC, and many more main stream news channels.

  • I wouldn't trust those news networks

  • ahh no you somewhat misunderstood me in captions on the bottom part of the video it was talking death and such

  • Splendid! Very appropriate. Chaplin would be proud to see his memory live on in such a way. I guess it's kinda like history repeating itself.

  • MoveOn sucks

  • bush ≠ competence

  • HAHAHA!

  • O.o !

    mui buenO!

  • Chaplin lives! hehe

  • BRAVO !!!!!! That was Brilliant ! Chaplin would have approved 100% I " betcha"

  • haha funny video

  • Sadly...You did great work.

  • LAME!!!

  • I hate Bush. I mean, I really HATE him! I HATE him because he is a putz, and an imbecile at that.

  • Bush = open borders = more Democrats. You guys should be blowing him for what he's done.

  • It's better than having more CONSEVATIVES in.

  • HITLER vs BUSH Part 10 - BOTH:

    Misused intelligence services (H:Abwehr,SS; B:NSA,CIA) to infiltrate/sabotage other governments

    Fabricated evidence to justify attacking/occupying countries (H:Poland; B:Iraq etc)

    Created enormous military machines, spending more than competitors combined

    Used private armies (H:SA,SS; B:Blackwater etc) when convenient

    Awakened world that they would bring on war no matter what

    Politicized judiciary to subjugate it to the executive (H: Freisler; B:Ashcroft,Gonzales)

  • um idiot hitler VS bush

    hitler:killed directly over 10 million ppl

    restricted all social and civil liberties

    um big differences man you should modify your argument cause its really stupid

  • i beleive most of the analogy comes from prescott bushes ties to banks involved in war profiteering in the 40's once the word nazi got dropped people just made the jump... though he did use the word crusade once or twice.

  • HITLER vs BUSH Part 9 - BOTH:

    Gave false impression of widespread support from allies (cajoled, intimidated or bribed into associating)

    Promoted militarism during economic recession

    Created bogeymen & imaginary enemies (H:Bolshevism,Jews; B:Al-Q,Axis of Evil)

    H threatened Czechoslovakia with invasion in 1937-8 unless it complied, but invaded after it did; B did the same with Iraq in 2002-3

    If a target country gave in to existing demands to save itself, increased demands as a pretext to attack

  • HITLER vs BUSH Part 8 - BOTH:

    Ignored inconvenient treaties(H:Versailles; B:Kyoto,Geneva etc)

    Kept reducing circle of trusted aides as policies kept boomeranging

    Convinced weak/partisan media to suppress unhelpful stories

    Both trampled on citizens' rights, ignoring Constitution when it was in the way

    Used intimidation & fraud to "win" elections

    Popularity plunged as fortunes of war turned against them

    Pursued reckless violent foreign policy without mandate & despite widespread opposition abroad

  • HITLER vs BUSH Part 7 - BOTH:

    Strategic allies in regions they sought to control (H:Italy+E.Eur; B:Israel)

    Made patriotism a central plank of regime

    Eager to shed blood on official duty (all-time record for state executions held by Governor B)

    Shunned Legislature; extensive leisure time with aides (H:Obersalzburg; B:Crawford)

    Used national resources, seized assets for Party ends

    Refused to be subject to international oversight (H:LoN; B:UN,ICC)

    Used wars to blind people to oppressive leadership

  • HITLER vs BUSH Part 6 - BOTH:

    Misused Darwinism (H:Aryan superiority;B:fundamentalist Creationism/ID)

    Looted/invoiced invaded countries

    Idolized Wild West Frontier Law (H had 1000+ cowboy films;B refers to simplistic cowboy values,exaggerates cowboy accent)

    Claimed enemies were part of a global plot (in reality, the attacked nations were all unconnected)

    Claimed powers far beyond those of their office

    Used citizenry to spy on each other to ferret out dissidents

    Came to power via a minority vote

  • HITLER vs BUSH Part 5 - BOTH:

    Held secret trials against their detractors;residents & others simply disappeared

    Enjoyed diminishing public trust

    In total denial for years (H for 2, B for 5) that they had lost their wars

    Hid failures,casualty pics from their citizens

    Had an "open door" policy for corporate criminals willing to provide monetary support

    Hid failures,casualty pics from their citizens

    Told enormous lies

    Appointed Propaganda Czars (H:Goebbels,B:Karen Hughes(retd))

    Promoted xenophobia

  • HITLER vs BUSH Part 4 - BOTH:

    Approvingly used the term "propaganda"

    Claimed unique historic destiny for country & providential role for self

    Claimed history would ultimately vindicate defeats & unpopular actions

    Micromanaged news coverage (H via Goebbels,B via Fox etc) to ensure most were seriously misinformed

    Saw conflict as "us good, them bad"

    While making populist-patriotic speeches, served rich vested interests (B confessed his "political base")

    Grew increasingly out-of-touch with reality

  • HITLER vs BUSH Part 3 - BOTH:

    Tortured captives to point of death

    Located secret/known concentration camps/interrogation centers outside their countries, out of reach of lawyers+courts

    Denied enemies Geneva convention rights

    Invaded with aerial blitzkrieg/shock & awe followed by heavy armor; no exit plans

    Denied occupied peoples basic freedoms (rights existed only on paper)

    Quickly had overwhelming support from naive, ill-educated, low IQ, violent folk

    Indefinite detention without charge, trial

  • HITLER vs BUSH Part 2 - BOTH: Ignored warnings their actions would trigger World War Demanded total loyalty from associates Called self a War Leader Spent massively on war without domestic cutbacks: result: borrowing, devaluation Began war on one front (Czech/Poland;Al-Q/Afgh) then expanded it Emphasized ruthlessness of enemies so as to justify his own brutality Overruled/fired military experts Shredded his country's Constitution Claimed divine inspiration Elections involved vote-fraud/scandals
  • HITLER vs BUSH Part 1 - BOTH: Claimed supreme leader/C-in-C status H quit the UN's predecessor;B defies UN Endlessly glorified patriotism Misused a tragedy (Reichstag fire,9/11) to rollback civil liberties & start crackdowns Attacked pre-emptively Ignored/manipulated adverse judicial decisions Used war to distract from domestic failure Fought for oil (also H:land;B:control) but claimed to be liberators Used secret trials & extrajudicial torture camps Wholly polarized their country's population
  • Haha hilarious!

    He's nothing like Hitler (from Chaplin's "The Great Dictator).

    But, it explains a lot and it is funny.

  • So funny! Althought I wouldn't go as far as comparing Bush to Hitler (or Hynkel, as portraied in The Great Dictator) but he's getting closer by the minute.

  • I LOLED!

  • jajajaj ji this just had to be funny

  • "You know that since George Bush has become president, gas has basically tripled in price. Bush is an oil man. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm just saying that if we had elected Colonel Sanders president and the price of chicken had tripled, I'd be a little suspicious."

  • I hate how many "elite" r members of groups i.e. skull and bones, freemasons, and go to events like the Bohemian Grove (where elite meet/yr for retreat) Did u c the hidden camera vid from abc news showing the initiation at skull & bones? Where they are chanting and PRETEND TO KILL SOMEONE? Or the vid from Bohemian Grove where they do satanic rituals and pray in front of a 50-ft statue? Or how some free masons explain why they r satanists &why u shld be 2?These ppl SHOULD NOT RUN THEGOV!

  • EVERY MAMA FOR OBAMA !

  • twat

  • I think Chaplin would have approved.

  • please do not contrast Bush and Chaplin, there could not be a greater difference between the genius of Chaplin, and the foolishness of the other guy

  • THANK YOU!! God it's been 8 years- his presidency is almost up- and they still complain about it. I have my problems with the government too, but I'm not going to say it's all his fault. It's actually congress's fault. But regardless, he won, he's president, stop crying about it- Al Gore and John Kerry did!

  • Yes and I'm happy about it!

  • Good video! Bush is the new Hitler... or Hynkel??

  • You're an asshole. Plain and simple.

  • I am referring to Omega-asshole or whatever this pathetic NeoClown calls himself.

  • Brilliantly done I would have used Chaplins music however wich was perfect for demonstrating the ease with which he tossed the entire world into the air.

  • lmao i comment on that on charli chaplin video

  • Vote for a real candidate not some Globalist CFR member! The CFR was founded by David Rockefeller (an admitted globalist) Obama, like every other CFR member, is an arm of that think tank and will do it's bidding. He voted 4 thought crime bill S 1959 --- People like "Naomi Wolf" are waking up to what's happening -- Ron Paul 2008!

  • Dead Right!! Because of GW this country is in serious trouble. He allowed the corrupt Central Banks to steal your money. He helped the Corporations take US jobs overseas via Managed Trade Agreements like NAFTA, CAFTA, & GATT. He stripped all US citizens of HABEAS CORPUS and He's about to end US Sovereignty through his CFR "North American Union"

  • Okay that was just creepy.

  • i agree with you on that.

  • well it was a funny parody, yet weirdly haunting!

  • fabulous!!! hahaha

  • Wow, the guy is just like him!

  • Amazing!

  • HAHAHA

    HAHAHAHA

  • wow that's exactly what i excepted. a political discussion instead of laughs about the movie.

    go to a tv show if you want to discuss that but i don't think that youtube is the right place to do that.

  • rofl

    FUCK BUSH !!

    FUCK ALL WHO LOVE BUSH U PEACE OF SHIT

    YOU REGRET IN THE DAY OF JUDGEMENT

  • with what u see in the first couple of seconds and how u can make it look like its bush... i wonder if those Osama videos are really him too.>!

  • Well, i dont think he accually wants to control the world, hes just incredibly stupid and only cares about his Precious Money (smeagol/golem accent).

  • Yeah - you are such a commentator, it makes me wonder if freedom of speech might not be an idea which has lived out its usefulness.

    After all, the Demoncrats have decided that it is not a universal value, haven't they? Iraqis are unworthy - why do we necessarily still deserve freedom in America, hmmm?

  • Riche idée, mais ils tout de même bien plus faible que n'importe quel autre Adénoïd Hinkel du monde, puisque les état-uniens sont une grande nation démocratique depuis l'aube de leur histoire. Enfin, si j'ai bien compris...

  • Vous l'avez, mon ami.

  • EXELENTE VIDEO... MUY BUENO

  • Brilliant!