Dear people who say if you're gay, you're pretty much gonna get AIDS,
Straight people can get AIDS too. Along with a truckload of other STDs, so get over it. It's not just a specific homosexual STD. I'd love to see a homophones face when THEY get AIDS.
@coleyCHAOTIC They said "hypocritical republicans". You're not one. They didn't say, "republicans". They're talking about the ones that use the hypocritical arguments against gay marriage specifically.
@wendylokaable Soo truee:) and @003Godsend gurllll puhlease.! Why are youeven watching this, my cousins are gay, do you hate them too.? Gonna call them fags.? Well if you are, cool have fun with your hate life.
@003Godsend Wow i hate people like you. You're so closed minded. If you hate LGBT people then why would you even watch this? If only closed minded people like you came with closed mouths the world would be a much better please.
@003Godsend i know, "don't feed the troll" still.... i'll applaude the fact that you're not "a fag", congratulations
i'm straight too, but you know what? i fucking love my gay friends!!!! not because i take a look to their HIV results, but because they're amazing people
you don't like queers because they've got HIV? what about kids that have AIDS because their moms transmitted it to them? you also hate them?
Gay people do not choose to be gay.. Its the same as how you know that you like the opposite sex they know that they like the same sex. People in this world are so horrible because they are scared to accept anything other than what they know, its a horrible day that someone gets bullied because of being attracted to or falling in love with someone of the same sex. I think that If you don't like gay people don't watch these vids and just don't associate with them. But you will be missing out
1. in this day and age it is fucking impossible to do that because of the tranies flirting and doing shit with a straight guy and THEN admitting they are tranies expecting everything to be fucking A-OK
2. divorce illegal are you fucking retarded? what if one gay abuses his partner? yeah exactly
3. corrupt system is fucking corrupt. some want the easy life
4. get over it? how? if it is plastered all over the fucking media all the time?? and being glorified by it?
It won't be long until those performing bestiality on their pets is going to come out of the closet and demand equal marriage rights too...geeez, what is this world coming to?
@NamiTheNekoVamp I got no problem with love and peace, but if being gay was normal or "OK" then why were most gay people ashamed of being gay before Youtube ever existed? It wasn't until a few celebrities started "coming out of the closet" that many gay people have mustered up the courage to announce that they're gay. Your sarcasm is accepted in kind.
im gay and this ad is horrible. I mean, this is a gay ad for gay people, but not for straight people... we have to convince the streight people, not the gays
Protecting marriage? Really? So you are telling me that Britney Spears can marry a guy and divorce withing 24 hours, Larry King can have 7 wives? and I'm the one destroying the institution of marriage?
i am 100% stright and one of my best friends is gay and likes men and i dont give a FCKhe is kool so what if he likes men he has never done or said anything bad aginst me ro anyone else for being stright. all in all gay people are just the same as stright people if you just sit down and talk to them and stop being ignorant. stop H8in on the HOMOs
Homicide: The voice of your brother’s blood is crying to me from the ground.” (Gn 4:10)
Sodomy: Because the outcry against Sodom & Gomorrah is great & their sin is very grave… (Gn 18:20-21)
Oppression of Widows and Orphans" “You shall not afflict any widow or orphan. If you do afflict them, & they cry out to me, I will surely hear their cry.” (Ex 21-23)
Cheating Laborers of Their Due: You shall not oppress a hired... (Dt 24:14-15)
@teton99 Well you know that some of us aren't christian right? So you're quoting of a mistranslated book that advocates for rape, incest, murder, genocide, slavery and many other forms of sins that Heaven demands, isn't impressive.
Explain why i reacted in such a way? cos im gay myself
Explain why i dont think you should compare Incest and Homosexuality? cos they are two different things, your basically saying that Heterosexuality is the same as incest too cos both Homo and Heterosexual are just two different sexual preferences and both completely normal, whilst incest is immorally wrong. kthnxbaii
I love the message, energy and theme of these videos. i know some are upset with the little kids swearing, But really, they are gonna swear sooner or later in life and it may seem stupid or wrong, but I at least like there is swearing for a good cause.
I mean, really, kids can watch movies like Shrek and what not that have subtle jokes for older audiences so by the rate of it, whats acceptable for younger kids may be VERY different in a few years. Who knows? For now, I just agree to FCKH8!
@firegal1993 Thanks honey. :) I don't know exactly where though it does have a French ring to it. Psht, whatever it is, is sexy as hell. My ladywood is strong.
its about time we get ppl to stand up for gay ppl rites everyone has d rite to love and b with who they want to b with and its no ones problem its their life so let them live it the way they choose to live it
i'm pretty sure they're not targeting all republicans (my parents are republican but are still for gay rights), just mainly those in the senate who use the bible and religious reasons as a way to enforce anti gay legislation so don't take offense :)
uggh, this is the worst thing i have ever seen, making kids cuss, My friend Charlie showed me this and told me to get on my computer to type what i think about and it's dumb
i cant believe the IGNORANCE out there! this girl called me a racist bigot because i compared the struggle against homophobia to the civil rights movement. im so angry_its like hitting against a brick wall of hatred and intolerance....
why cant people just accept that everyone has the right to equality and tolerance?
i love these videos_they restore my faith in PEOPLE
I'm so happy that some people online actually support me and my love for my best friends girlfriend (aka, my bff) and NOT try to change me, like my whole entrie homophobic family. :)
They've got the right idea but the "fucking republicans" part was so unnecessary. Don't want stereotypes about gay people? Don't make stereotypes about other people. I'm republican. I'm straight. And I support gay rights just as much as the next guy.
So I used this video for my group presentation of the topic of gay marriage since I had the liberal side with a couple other members of my group. We had to present both the conservative and liberal side. Needless to say, people loved the video and I feel like I spread the word to 30 people all at once. Talk about spreading this like herpes.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Jesus is Lord and He is coming soon. He will not hold anyone guiltless who willingly and purposely lives in or advocates sin. God intended for marriage to be between one man and one woman only. I don't say this because I'm hateful or afraid or trying to judge; I say this because it's the truth and I care about what will become of you! And if you care about someone, you will tell them the truth and help save them. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10
I dont know about the emergency hospital visitations thing......? nywys,,,,"FUCK" is a hateful word...hmmm? This is major intense,,well, I guess so is my husband :) xoxo
I regularly help campaign for gay rights issues, and I'm glad they are raising money, but I don't think the "edginess" of this video does anything to show homosexuals in a professional, equal light.
I personally would rather see an ad that promotes homosexuals as being just like everyone else. I think that would cut to the core of the issue, and appeal to the "constitutional orginalism" that the opposition seems to hold so dear.
Number of studies reveal that kids raised by gay couples have a lot more stress to deal with, resulting in depression, suicidal tendencies, sadness, emotional trauma. So to the people who filmed this, I don't care what you do with your junk under your undies, don't involve children into your pantomime of marriage. If you wanna get "married" and form a family try to do the real thing.
@IDareToSpeak "I don't care what you do with your junk under your undies"
Thank you DareToSpeak for speaking out. However, it is exactly what these people do with their junk under their undies that has escalated disease at a terrible financial and social cost to society. Heterosexual society as a whole has a perfect right to expose and outlaw unnatural behaviour that imposes such a cost on it, and diverts funds from other legitimate research such as cancer. So I AM concerned (more)
@OneJohnFiveTwelve Escalated disease? Are you listening to yourself? HETEROSEXUAL people escalate disease too. It's called SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES. Not HOMOSEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES. Stupid bigot.
You have chosen to call me a "stupid bigot" rather than actually debate what I've said. Of course ANY promiscuous behaviour will spread disease whether homo or hetero. And that is just the point: promiscuity is a central feature of homosexual behaviour. But not only is promiscuity central, so is thrusting the penis into another man's rectum, which in itself is dangerous behaviour because the lining of the rectum (more)
@OneJohnFiveTwelve Hi, i did debate with what you said. you responded to it. And I'm not calling just anyone who doesn't agree with what I say a bigot. Just the ones who are. And also, not all homosexuals use nitrate to heighten sexual pleasure, because you know what? It is sexually satisfying. As you've clearly never done it, you have no way to say that it isn't. And just because SOME people are okay with cheating on their wives, doesnt mean we all are. Most of us HATE vaginas!
@sk8rj04 lining of the rectum was never designed to be adequate to this misuse. Tears are common, and semen (itself an immune system compromiser) escape, together with foeces and its filthy bacteria directly into the bloodstream. Add to this the use of nitrate drugs to heighten sexual pleasure (after all, homosexual acts are not real sex, so are not, on their own so sexually satisfying) and you have an assault on the immune system. Then simply follow the stats and have dozens (more)
@sk8rj04 (continued) and have dozens, if not literally hundreds of homosexual partners and the word "escalate" becomes entirely applicable. Add to that the fact that many homosexual partners "go both ways", take the diseases home to their wives and you have the totally innocent suffering.
Now, Sk8, I suggest you go and look up your local GLB&T website for this information. You seem to be closed off to listening to anyone else, calling anyone who disagrees with you a "stupid bigot". (more)
And by the way, I only dealt with the most basic act of homosexual behaviour. Do you want to talk about other homosexual behaviours and how they relate to ... "escalate"?
@IDareToSpeak So I AM concerned. The whole argument about the privacy of the bedroom is a furphy. We don't allow murder, paedophilia, incest or any other behaviour detrimental to society as a whole to continue just because its done in the bedroom (and neither do we grace those behaviours with the term "human rights" comparing them to, for example, the fight of minority and black races for equality).
@papadrugio Its your right to have that opinion. I just hope you would have the same attitude if an anti-gay group posted a video in a similar medium which also featured children cursing saying things like "F gay ppl" you can imagine the possible posts. Note that I'm not saying you would have to be pleased about the message, you could be flat out pissed and that's your right, but you would believe that the medium was a fair one? Before you say, but I'm right ,realize everyone feels thus.
@isagcastro "...a great absurd...". No, it isn't an absurdity. Sometimes it is necessary (eg domestic violence. No-one could sensibly argue single-parenthood as having an inherent evolutionary advantage).
@GoldenLuckyCharm If, in a 3 minute presentation he were unable to keep up the "well-adjusted image", wouldn't he indeed be a mess? And perhaps, like many who have pushed through adversity, he IS well-adjusted. After all, as a businessman with a large, successful tutoring business (“Iowa City Learns”) he is indeed an exception at 19. He can't know though what it would have been like to have a Dad. He’s been robbed of that.
One example – either way – cannot prove a general affect.
@OneJohnFiveTwelve How is it adversity? Its not that uncommon a situation for gay parents to raise a child. What does it matter if he didn't have a Dad, he is a contributing member of society. There are people who have a mom and dad who contribute a lot less than that young man.and to me you seem to kind of contradict yourself. You say this video should be enough to prove a bad effect, yet my example of a good video cannot prove a general affect. How does that work?
@OneJohnFiveTwelve I'm saying two parents of the same gender can contribute as much to raising a child as two heterosexual parents. Thats what i was implying by saying what did it matter that he didn't have a dad. His moms obviously raised him well. I don't think that speech 'hid ill effects' nor do i think he is an exception. I personally know many successful individuals, raised in gay homes, as well as gay couples currently raising children, and based on what i've seen, their parenting...cont
@GoldenLuckyCharm "I'm saying two parents of the same gender can contribute as much to raising a child as two heterosexual parents." Therefore you are saying gender is irrelevant. You are saying there is no difference, that neither men, nor women have anything unique to their gender to contribute. It may not worry you that you are denying everything that is Biblical concerning the role of gender in the home, but are you aware that you are denying a multitude of studies that point to the (more)
@OneJohnFiveTwelve and you're saying each gender always contributes the same things, you are lumping the role of "genders" into groups. I'm saying they can teach their child good manners, and be good role models by their polite behavior, and instill good values of character in their child. If they are honest people who will pass that on, then no gender does not matter. Single parents raise children too and while statistically that might predispose them to difficulties, the majority do fine.
@GoldenLuckyCharm (continued) that point to the different qualities that Dads and Mums provide? Mums provide the caring, nurturing environment. Dad's provide stability, guidance, the male role model. That perhaps oversimplifies it, but you get my drift?
I thank God that I had both a Mum and a Dad who remained faithful to each other until death parted them. They gave a wonderful example.
@OneJohnFiveTwelve I know they do provide different qualities typically, but that doesn't mean a child is hopelessly doomed in character if they get a slightly different upbringing. Two parents of the same gender, or a single parent for that matter, can raise a good child.
@GoldenLuckyCharm "...contributing member of society as any straight couple".
There is always, of course the child themselves. Parents are not the ONLY influence on a young person's life, tho' they have the potential to be the most influential. It isn't surprising that a young chap brought up by two lesbians who are caring people will look favourably on homosexuality (as does the young chap in your example) as a valid lifestyle. He has experienced nothing else.
@OneJohnFiveTwelve Well, then on the flip side, you (and I) have experienced nothing else but being brought up in a straight home, so you think that is the valid lifestyle with the least dangers. I agree young people have many things to influence them, and sometimes they specifically go against what parents are trying to get them to believe, but if whatever gender the parents are they are honest caring people, they will do their best at raising someone who embraces the same honesty they do.
@OneJohnFiveTwelve So how is this one video, proving a bad effect? In all honesty, its not 'corrupting children' its just a word. They're going to hear it by the time they get to high school anyway.... and the purpose of it isn't the word, it was to get it noticed (which is obviously effective what with all the discussion on this vid)
i love internet homo-haters. my mind pictures them as those sad, pathetic guys whose opinions nobody actually bother to listen, or sometimes as some poor guy that had his girlfriend leaving him for some random hot chick... Ok, i know this last scenario isn't likely, but... From where i stand, for someone to believe that love, homo or not, is a matter of choice, they were never in love - i can only feel sorry for them. you're going to heaven? good for you. at least i LIVED.
well this is to the 68 people who hate this video it doesnt affect us gay people you'r all probarly some redneck, hillbilly bastards thinking oh that video wants gay rights so lets dislike because i have nothing else to do except look up gay on youtube to be perfectly honest you have a problem get over it or dont look up gay on youtube and to all my gays over in america i<3u stay strong and dont let the hillbillies affect you xx
John, in all your arguing about religion and how homosexuality around, you haven't once that I've seen addressed the issues raised in this video. In addition, getting a marriage license in no way involves religion, it involves the government. As for the children issue? It's been proven repeatedly that children raised in a homosexual household are NO worse off than children raises in a heterosexual household.
From memory, the video raised no real issues. It was an excuse to cram a video with the 4 letter word through the mouths of children far too young to understand the issues.
It did, of course raise the question of "hate", that imaginary quality assumed by homosexuals to belong to anyone who disagrees with homosexual behaviour.
Through my posts I have argued the real issues: Disease, social and human cost and have responded to religious (more)
@MelficeCyrum (continued) ...and have RESPONDED to religious argument and questions.
I almost forgot: The video also raised the scenario of homosexuals "marrying" each other. The very notion of legitimizing perverted behaviour that carries enormous disease, social, human and economic costs by giving it the title of "marriage" is abhorrent. (more)
Regarding children raised in a homosexual environment, I find it impossible to believe that any thinking person could really believe that it would have no affect on their outlook, at bare minimum.
You can "prove" anything with studies so designed. The facts are vastly different. Try Googling and look up some studies not funded by homosexuals, government departments and politicians who want to court the "gay" agenda. Repeatedly you'll find (more).
@MelficeCyrum (continued) ...tragically twisted kids. The fact of the increased domestic violence, the short average duration of supposed stable homosexual relationships (something like 2-3 years) compared to heterosexual relationships and the increased promiscuity while in those relationships should be enough to tell anyone that it is no way to bring up a precious, innocent child.
The foul language and seething hatred within this video should be sufficient too.
@OneJohnFiveTwelve for factual counters to your argument please see the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the American Psychoanalytic Association, the National Association of Social Workers, the Child Welfare League of America, the North American Council on Adoptable Children and the Canadian Psychological Association.
@KozySpike Sorry Kozy, but your "appeal to authority" cannot hide the facts. I think you need to read my posts again.
The APA is hardly a credible authority. Their DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) is a joke. With each edition they get together and ruminate, and vote over what new "conditions" they have encountered that they can give a name and include in the manual. Once in the manual they can prescribe for that condition and claim a fee. EG "Shyness" is in there, (more)
@KozySpike (continued) Shyness is in there with a grand name, of course. "Social Anxiety Disorder" I think it was.
Homosexuality used to be in it but has been removed. So you see, as far as the APA is concerned a "shy" person is mentally ill, whereas a homosexual person is quite normal.
@OneJohnFiveTwelve let's pretend you're right. (you aren't, but for the sake of argument, let's pretend). Even if you are right, you still need to discredit 10 highly recognized and trusted organizations on child welfare who are in favor of gay parenting. Go.
@KozySpike "to discredit 10 highly recognized”. Here? No. You’ll just give me 10 more… and 10 more, and say “let’s pretend”. You see, there are hundreds of those. YOU only scratched the surface.
Instead you have to look below the surface, at the huge wealth and political clout of this “oppressed community”. You say I’m not right but you don’t say about what. So first, let’s revisit the APA. The NGLTF with its annual budget in 1994 of over a million and 18,000 members is credited with (more)
@KozySpike (Cont’d) credited with persuading the APA to remove homosexuality from its DSM (no doubt with help from the Association of Gay & Lesbian Psychiatrists). This gave homosexual leaders access to the White House, through aide Midge Constanza. Several pro-homo statutes were intro’d to Congress.
That’s a smaller lobby group with a small budget. You have LAMBDA, a homosexual legal organisation persuing test case litigation across America with about 50 cases at a given time. (more)
@KozySpike (Cont’d) given time. There’s the Human Rights Campaign Fund, a homosexual political action fund with 750,000 members and supporters which spent over $7 mill in 2008 to elect specific candidates to office. There’s GLAAD, which opposes any negative media portrayal of homosexuals and puts positive spin. There’s the ACLU – not officially homosexual, but very powerful and committed to homosexual “rights”.
The effects of these organisations is evident even in “The Nation”s May 3 (more)
@KozySpike (cont’d) May 3 1993 article by Kopkind: “younger gay men and “baby dykes”… rapidly reconfiguring American values, redesigning sensibilities and REMODELING POLITICS”.
There are many, many more homosexual associations with their fingers in every pie, lobbying Congress, influencing the media and producing very sub-standard studies that lack basic controls (such as blind-control groups) simply to push their story. I can give examples of homosexuals leading these. Would you like them?
@KozySpike (cont’d) like them? At the same time they hide from the public the desperately sordid story of their actual behaviour (source: CDC), and when the facts come to light of their increased disease, suicide and substance abuse and their denials no longer work, they blame their deep depression on the heterosexual community for… wait for it… “homophobia” (that word they made up themselves to prevent honest debate), an excuse which does not, cannot stand scrutiny.
@OneJohnFiveTwelve I never listed a homo-friendly organization. If you refer to my list again, they are all organizations solely oriented toward child welfare. Those are the ones you need to discredit. I'm assuming they know more than you on the subject of child development. Unless you, yourself are a child welfare expert? Here's that list again, (next post). You have three options: discredit all of them, prove yourself to be more knowledgeable, or concede to their findings. The choice is yours.
the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychoanalytic Association, the National Association of Social Workers, the Child Welfare League of America, the North American Council on Adoptable Children and the Canadian Psychological Association.
By the way, say the word and I'll give you that information - right here for everyone to read - from the Center for Diseases Control on just what behaviour homosexuals actually engage in, and the resultant rise in diseases
@OneJohnFiveTwelve I doubt your abilities to produce any counter arguments to the ones I've presented (you still have yet to discredit 9 major organizations on child welfare, or prove yourself more knowledgeable) just as much as I doubt your ability to use English; "Resultant" is a noun, not properly used the way you did, you could call the rise in diseases "a resultant", but cannot call them "resultant diseases." For the adjective form, you need "resulting." Your credibility is dwindling.
Well, you're indeed trying hard, but you are incorrect.
From the first online dictionary I googled:
re·sul·tant (r-zltnt)
adj.
Issuing or following as a consequence or result.
The second meaning is a noun. The first an adjective. Merriam Webster agrees as well.
Oh copme on you can do better than that to try and discredit me. Why don't you try to focus on the diseases spread by homosexual acts and discredit me on that?
@OneJohnFiveTwelve You're conveniently overlooking the fact that you still, yes still, have yet to discredit 9 organizations on child welfare who are in favor of homosexual parenting, or prove yourself more knowledgeable. Notice when I brought up your misuse of that word, I coupled it with this reminder. Your reply to that comment gave no effort to oblige. Even if you are right about the APA, you haven't shown yourself to be right about the 9 other organizations, nor made any attempt to.
@KozySpike "I brought up your misuse of that word". You are a very stubborn person aren't you? I have shown you from 2 dictionaries yet you still refuse to acknowledge and apologise for your error.
Earlier in my posts (4 weeks ago) I pointed out to YOU that you only scratched the surface of organisations that approve of homosexual behaviour. Instead of spending precious time investigating each of those 10 to have you then say, "yeah, but what about this 10", I showed you - demonstrated - (more)
@KozySpike (continued) demonstrated the political, social and legal clout that the hyperactive homosexual lobby wields.
So to answer your question about these 10 "respected, trusted" organisations, how can any organisation that would condone behaviour that spreads diseases like a plague by dignifying it with the term "marriage" and placing children in such an environment be respected and trusted?
You cannot deny the disease comment and retain credibility. Just look up your local GLBT site.
@OneJohnFiveTwelve Where do your stats on homosexual relationships,& their length come from? (they can't be marriage stats since most places they AREN'T ALLOWED TO GET MARRIED) and um comparative 2 hetero relationships? Where "Larry King is getting his 8th divorce,Liz Taylor is possibly getting married for a 9th time,Britney Spears had a 55 hour marriage,and Jesse James & Tiger Woods are screwing EVERYTHING? This must be wonderful logic you have to propose that hetero relationships r more stable
@GoldenLuckyCharm Norway has had de-facto same-sex marriage since the early nineties. But a “relationship” has never necessarily implied marriage even in the heterosexual community. Homosexual couples have certainly had care of children.
Yes, you can show the decline of marriage in the hetero community. It has been a process resulting from weakened marriage laws (eg no-fault divorce decades ago). Currently however, even tho critically weakened, hetero marriage is still far stabler. (more)
@OneJohnFiveTwelve I don't think the 50% divorce rate makes hetero marriages more stable personally. And the stat from 1994, that could've changes so much in nearly 20 years, not really reliable. In all honesty i think ALL studies have bias somewhere, its just finding one with the most minimal bias...all studies trying to prove either side. I don't think ALL government studies are biased , you just have to evaluate the legitimacy of each study.
@GoldenLuckyCharm (continued) ….still far stabler. Its not rocket science that when marriage took years to dissolve through a fault establishing process, people went into marriage with far more thought and certainty. Illigitimacy was very low. Crime was low. Women and children out at night didn’t have to fear for their safety.
In every country where homosexual marriage has been affirmed, marriage itself has suffered over the next decade or so. Illegitimacy statistics show this. (more)
@OneJohnFiveTwelve and the fact that "every" country where homosexual marriage has been affirmed, marriage itself has suffered over the next decade or so. Illegitimacy statistics show this......those countries don't have our laws, values, rights the exact same, so whos to say it'll have that same negative effect here. People in the 50s/60s thought interracial marriage would do the same thing, with similar arguments. I say they should have the right to marry who they really love.
@GoldenLuckyCharm "those countries don't have our laws, values, rights the exact same, so whos to say it'll have that same negative effect here."
I think you're drawing a very long bow ;-)
"...who they really love. " First, according to statistics, very few homosexuals will take up on marriage. A tiny minority. It is validation that they are wanting, and marriage is the final frontier that says society regards homosexuality as an equal alternative. Second, the English word "love" (more)
@OneJohnFiveTwelve all i meant about the countries was that the situations aren't the same so its kind of a false comparison or prediction, because we can't really tell what it will do until its implemented.I mean we can guess all day but until it happens its really all just speculation.Statistics really are a observation of whats happened but ANYTHING can happen in future, there are hundreds of un-forseen factors that make the future and results unpredictable even with the most scientific stats
@OneJohnFiveTwelve and so whats wrong with them wanting validation? Again, stats might comment on something, but really stats can't speak for the community there is no way any stat can include every person, just the nature of statistics, the target group is never totally represented. So what if the part that do want marriage is a large number, and just didn't respond to that survey? Can really skew it. IF people want to marry, its for one of the 2 "love types" you mentioned. And we don't know...
@OneJohnFiveTwelve ...we don't know how many are of each type (really) until we allow it. and why shouldn't we? Honestly, you've presented all these stats on how it would damage the institution of marriage based on the current rates of partners they have, stability, etc, but we don't KNOW until we let all those who want to marry do so, there might be quiet shy members of that community who want to, but don't respond to stats and surveys where you present info from. D
@OneJohnFiveTwelve Domestic violence? there are unreported and false reported crimes... Again, this is all similar to the arguments brought up in the discussion on interracial marriage, and once implemented those predictions turned out to be mostly false. Perhaps, because of the way they have to hide it makes them feel insecure, which results in the higher numbers, and lesbian women having male partners because they don't feel accepted enough to come out? Just food for thought...
@GoldenLuckyCharm (Continued) love covers everything from sexual feelings and expression to unconditional love. When the Bible talks of love, it means only the latter. Homosexual "love" majors on the former, on sexual gratification. Again, I refer to my post on homosexual behaviour (say the word...).
Unconditional love is right behaviour. It is behaviour you should indeed exercise towards your male friends, but it doesn't mean having pseudo-sex with them.
@OneJohnFiveTwelve (cont) who they really love. I dont think they'll make MORE mistakes than straight people do in thinking who they love is the one, and trying to make relationships work out. I'm not saying they're foolproof in relationships, but they should be allowed to show their devotion through marriage as easily as straight people do.
@GoldenLuckyCharm "I dont think they'll make MORE mistakes than straight people do in thinking who they love is the one, and trying to make relationships work out."
Statistics show that homosexuals supposedly stable relationships have many times more "illicit" relationships that heterosexuals. They have far higher domestic violence. Here's a shock: even lesbians on average have more sex WITH MEN that heterosexual women do.
@OneJohnFiveTwelve Both groups have examples of good and bad relationships.Really what it comes down 2 is why can someone else impose restrictions on another's sexuality? It might bother them for religious reasons, medical reasons,etc,they don't have 2 do it!They can be with their heterosexual partner,but why do they have the right to restrict another person when it has nothing 2 do with them?One's character shouldn't have 2 be determined by who the law says you can fully express ur love 2...
Hey!!! I heard H8ers have a shorter life and usually a fucked up mood!!! :D
Desirion83 1 week ago
1:25 lol
Christianrocks562 2 weeks ago
Jesus shit, how I love the "f" word :)
kickrocksscrub 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Prop 8 was deemed unconstitutional!!
mangaqueen20 3 weeks ago 2
This video is most popular with:
Gender Age
Female 18-24
Male 45-54(!!!)
Male 18-24
Grown up men in closet? So sad.
majupcels 1 month ago
Dear people who say if you're gay, you're pretty much gonna get AIDS,
Straight people can get AIDS too. Along with a truckload of other STDs, so get over it. It's not just a specific homosexual STD. I'd love to see a homophones face when THEY get AIDS.
FCKH8 -3
purplemonkeyrock 2 months ago
I love it
"don't fck with my queer daddy's!"
crazycupcakes221 2 months ago 5
They said "fuck" 27 times in this video. lmfao
Pmatrx13 2 months ago in playlist Liked videos
Not all christians are against Gays. lol.
ohaiiCupcakes 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@003Godsend Gay basher? Ewwie! S:
SlightlyInsane94 2 months ago
just saying, i'm a republican and im not against gay marriage. im totally for it. so it's not just republicans. =.=
coleyCHAOTIC 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@coleyCHAOTIC They said "hypocritical republicans". You're not one. They didn't say, "republicans". They're talking about the ones that use the hypocritical arguments against gay marriage specifically.
elvickRULES 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from FCKH8
ok, i've got a question (specially to h8ers)
if a dude changes their junk via surgery, then he's a she.... right?
so if formerly dude is now a chick.... what's wrong with her marrying a dude?
i ask because, apparently, it's not the person that's important, but their genitals.....
UsagiFirex 2 months ago
@wendylokaable Soo truee:) and @003Godsend gurllll puhlease.! Why are youeven watching this, my cousins are gay, do you hate them too.? Gonna call them fags.? Well if you are, cool have fun with your hate life.
LexusCorradino143 2 months ago in playlist More videos from FCKH8
"Marry this shit"
I'd like to marry the chick wearing the shirt. ;D
FCK H8 <3
Doomtrain55 3 months ago
Learn to have tolerance for the intolerant.
stuff3 3 months ago
@stuff3 you're right... unless they actually do something to my friends, you're totally right. their problem if they h8 life
UsagiFirex 2 months ago
OH WOW. YOUR SO COOL BECAUSE YOUR EDGY AND SAY BAD WORDS.
You'll still get AIDS statically quicker than anyone else and won't live to be 50. That's why im not a fag.
003Godsend 3 months ago
@003Godsend Wow i hate people like you. You're so closed minded. If you hate LGBT people then why would you even watch this? If only closed minded people like you came with closed mouths the world would be a much better please.
wendylokaable 3 months ago
@003Godsend i know, "don't feed the troll" still.... i'll applaude the fact that you're not "a fag", congratulations
i'm straight too, but you know what? i fucking love my gay friends!!!! not because i take a look to their HIV results, but because they're amazing people
you don't like queers because they've got HIV? what about kids that have AIDS because their moms transmitted it to them? you also hate them?
UsagiFirex 2 months ago
@003Godsend Oh, because LOVING (not having sex, just LOVING) another person of the same sex can get you a STD? Mm-hmm, yeah, make perfect sense....
And of coarse you're not a rolled up pile of sticks/cigarette. Those things can't type.
If you want to hate, learn some facts, then get back to us :D
NamiTheNekoVamp 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Gay people do not choose to be gay.. Its the same as how you know that you like the opposite sex they know that they like the same sex. People in this world are so horrible because they are scared to accept anything other than what they know, its a horrible day that someone gets bullied because of being attracted to or falling in love with someone of the same sex. I think that If you don't like gay people don't watch these vids and just don't associate with them. But you will be missing out
Lucy0M0 3 months ago
@Lucy0M0
But you will be missing out on some amazing people with amazing experiences
Str8 against H8 :)
Lucy0M0 3 months ago
lets argue some of your points
1. in this day and age it is fucking impossible to do that because of the tranies flirting and doing shit with a straight guy and THEN admitting they are tranies expecting everything to be fucking A-OK
2. divorce illegal are you fucking retarded? what if one gay abuses his partner? yeah exactly
3. corrupt system is fucking corrupt. some want the easy life
4. get over it? how? if it is plastered all over the fucking media all the time?? and being glorified by it?
DarkNathify 4 months ago in playlist More videos from FCKH8
1:23 - 1:28 LMFAO
alancmfarrell95 4 months ago
It won't be long until those performing bestiality on their pets is going to come out of the closet and demand equal marriage rights too...geeez, what is this world coming to?
LordRigon 5 months ago
@LordRigon They actually already are. :D
But, we're trying to make it a world of love and acceptance, and don't worry, you won't be affected :D
NamiTheNekoVamp 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
ReekPost 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NamiTheNekoVamp I got no problem with love and peace, but if being gay was normal or "OK" then why were most gay people ashamed of being gay before Youtube ever existed? It wasn't until a few celebrities started "coming out of the closet" that many gay people have mustered up the courage to announce that they're gay. Your sarcasm is accepted in kind.
ReekPost 5 days ago
im in love with the blonde girl, she reminds me of hanna of pll and shes fierce
sweetkitoboy 5 months ago
nice
kmewsty93 5 months ago
im gay and this ad is horrible. I mean, this is a gay ad for gay people, but not for straight people... we have to convince the streight people, not the gays
llamaradaipa 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Don't fuck with my two gay dads..."
WeLiveToComment 7 months ago
Protecting marriage? Really? So you are telling me that Britney Spears can marry a guy and divorce withing 24 hours, Larry King can have 7 wives? and I'm the one destroying the institution of marriage?
ggtdaav 7 months ago 21
1:12 Yummy! :D
StreetsOfYuke 7 months ago
i am 100% stright and one of my best friends is gay and likes men and i dont give a FCKhe is kool so what if he likes men he has never done or said anything bad aginst me ro anyone else for being stright. all in all gay people are just the same as stright people if you just sit down and talk to them and stop being ignorant. stop H8in on the HOMOs
lordyoe 7 months ago 4
Sins that Cry Out for Heaven’s Vengeance
Homicide: The voice of your brother’s blood is crying to me from the ground.” (Gn 4:10)
Sodomy: Because the outcry against Sodom & Gomorrah is great & their sin is very grave… (Gn 18:20-21)
Oppression of Widows and Orphans" “You shall not afflict any widow or orphan. If you do afflict them, & they cry out to me, I will surely hear their cry.” (Ex 21-23)
Cheating Laborers of Their Due: You shall not oppress a hired... (Dt 24:14-15)
teton99 7 months ago
@teton99 Well you know that some of us aren't christian right? So you're quoting of a mistranslated book that advocates for rape, incest, murder, genocide, slavery and many other forms of sins that Heaven demands, isn't impressive.
Dansback21 7 months ago 3
this is flagged? wow youtube.
ExhumingExodus 7 months ago
yall idiots that are talking about "this movies is bad cuz kids are cussing" Im sure they cuss anyways so chill out
Nicolethompson92 7 months ago
@icesid321123
Explain why i reacted in such a way? cos im gay myself
Explain why i dont think you should compare Incest and Homosexuality? cos they are two different things, your basically saying that Heterosexuality is the same as incest too cos both Homo and Heterosexual are just two different sexual preferences and both completely normal, whilst incest is immorally wrong. kthnxbaii
JoshJigsawLucas 7 months ago 2
Perfect!!
HalliwellSon 7 months ago
@icesid321123
That's just fucking stupid and ignorant
Do NOT compare homosexuality with Incest and paedophilia etc
you call them blind and foolish? bitch get the fuck out'
When realisation hits you, i hope it comes in the form of a truck or something...
JoshJigsawLucas 7 months ago 4
I love the message, energy and theme of these videos. i know some are upset with the little kids swearing, But really, they are gonna swear sooner or later in life and it may seem stupid or wrong, but I at least like there is swearing for a good cause.
I mean, really, kids can watch movies like Shrek and what not that have subtle jokes for older audiences so by the rate of it, whats acceptable for younger kids may be VERY different in a few years. Who knows? For now, I just agree to FCKH8!
MissSeuss 7 months ago
I want a shirt to support FCKH8! Gah! Why I am broke!?
But still- FCK U H8TRS!!
x10Rose 7 months ago
was one of those chicks in school of rock???
ohhsade 7 months ago
Every time I watch this... my blood boils, FCKH8!!!!
Fureimes 7 months ago
I don't give a fuck about your gay son but I think its funny when he bloods from his ass
neodasus 8 months ago
Jesus had two dads. So why can't some people?
MissNemuify 8 months ago 3
Shirtless hotties...x3 And I'm getting my facebook all up in this thing's twitter!
Mady1355 8 months ago
gay marriage is legal in newyork. like this is you think it should be legal everywhere.
crazycheerleader18 8 months ago 12
The woman who says 'some chicks marry chicks' and 'at the ballot box' her accent, where is it from? Cuz I need to go find me a lady from there! :D
ElvenShalafi 8 months ago
@ElvenShalafi
I think she might be french...not sure where from though
firegal1993 7 months ago
@firegal1993 Thanks honey. :) I don't know exactly where though it does have a French ring to it. Psht, whatever it is, is sexy as hell. My ladywood is strong.
ElvenShalafi 7 months ago
@ElvenShalafi
most agree with you there...I've always loved l'accent féminine française
firegal1993 7 months ago
@firegal1993 Mmm, french, irish, scottish, a delicious southern drawl. I can't help it, I go weak at the knees for ladies with accents.
ElvenShalafi 7 months ago
its about time we get ppl to stand up for gay ppl rites everyone has d rite to love and b with who they want to b with and its no ones problem its their life so let them live it the way they choose to live it
jessi341 8 months ago
Gay Marriage in NY, Love Conquers all!
lifeismurder 8 months ago
WOOHOO! FCKH8!
FashionistoCameron 8 months ago
that guy saying "don't fuck with my husband" is a cuttie pie... damn
eumesmu 9 months ago 5
to the people who are republicans and against h8:
i'm pretty sure they're not targeting all republicans (my parents are republican but are still for gay rights), just mainly those in the senate who use the bible and religious reasons as a way to enforce anti gay legislation so don't take offense :)
sugarcube440 9 months ago
uggh, this is the worst thing i have ever seen, making kids cuss, My friend Charlie showed me this and told me to get on my computer to type what i think about and it's dumb
dylanstraveltales 9 months ago
i cant believe the IGNORANCE out there! this girl called me a racist bigot because i compared the struggle against homophobia to the civil rights movement. im so angry_its like hitting against a brick wall of hatred and intolerance....
why cant people just accept that everyone has the right to equality and tolerance?
i love these videos_they restore my faith in PEOPLE
GirlInColour 9 months ago
I'm so happy that some people online actually support me and my love for my best friends girlfriend (aka, my bff) and NOT try to change me, like my whole entrie homophobic family. :)
LocoTaco190 9 months ago
I love these videos ahahah, they're incredible :')
ayeshahahahahahah 9 months ago
They've got the right idea but the "fucking republicans" part was so unnecessary. Don't want stereotypes about gay people? Don't make stereotypes about other people. I'm republican. I'm straight. And I support gay rights just as much as the next guy.
FatBoyRunProductions 9 months ago 3
HEY IM FUCKIN REPUBLICAN AND I AM BI TOO, I AM ALL FOR GAY RIGHTS.
toxicitysugarbabe 9 months ago 5
OMG was that Deadlee? It was Deadlee wasnt it??? DEADLEE!!!...hopefully...
Zyrogez 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Don't fuck with me!
ZackPaslay 10 months ago
The swearing kids make the video just that bit funnier
OmgRawrify 10 months ago 131
So I used this video for my group presentation of the topic of gay marriage since I had the liberal side with a couple other members of my group. We had to present both the conservative and liberal side. Needless to say, people loved the video and I feel like I spread the word to 30 people all at once. Talk about spreading this like herpes.
musicluvr121 10 months ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Jesus is Lord and He is coming soon. He will not hold anyone guiltless who willingly and purposely lives in or advocates sin. God intended for marriage to be between one man and one woman only. I don't say this because I'm hateful or afraid or trying to judge; I say this because it's the truth and I care about what will become of you! And if you care about someone, you will tell them the truth and help save them. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10
AngelWyant 10 months ago
@AngelWyant stfu
littlewhiiterabbit 9 months ago
Don't fuck with my queer daddys haha win
metalwolfie69 10 months ago
It's cool that the kids were saying fuck. :D
XblackswanXx 10 months ago
"DON'T FUCK WITH MY 2 GAY DADS" is my favorite part.
FUCK HATE! <3
Libluvzmusic 10 months ago
I love that trans chick, she looks like she runs this shit,
"I'm straight... well, not really" (:
Dannyfan1997 11 months ago 157
@Dannyfan1997 I know right shes soo freakin fabulous :D
liotie 11 months ago
@Dannyfan1997 its a dude lol but ye i love him
thescarydancer 7 months ago
@thescarydancer I'm aware of her anotomic gender.
Dannyfan1997 7 months ago
Don't fuck with my (non existant.....) boyfriend
Zvane100 11 months ago
LOVE this video :D
Don't FUCK with my gay family and friends.
I will fuck you up ;D
TheJennyShow1 11 months ago
I dont know about the emergency hospital visitations thing......? nywys,,,,"FUCK" is a hateful word...hmmm? This is major intense,,well, I guess so is my husband :) xoxo
NiteOwl1224 11 months ago
That is so wrong in so many ways...
It could just as well have been an anti-gay rights ad.
scabw 11 months ago
@scabw What...?
margretteleigh 11 months ago
@scabw Whaaat ?
liotie 11 months ago
fck h8. you gotta a problem with gay love, Idk where you got it from cuz your mom was LOVING it last night. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Nicolethompson92 11 months ago
I regularly help campaign for gay rights issues, and I'm glad they are raising money, but I don't think the "edginess" of this video does anything to show homosexuals in a professional, equal light.
I personally would rather see an ad that promotes homosexuals as being just like everyone else. I think that would cut to the core of the issue, and appeal to the "constitutional orginalism" that the opposition seems to hold so dear.
nonamemage 11 months ago
that guy at 1.16 on the right, isn't he an actor, i cant remember if he is or not
59211bart 11 months ago
The name, Spirit Day comes from the purple stripe of the Rainbow Flag, defined by Gilbert Baker, creator of that flag, as 'representing "spirit"'.
59211bart 11 months ago
i'm straigh...'phfft'....well not really
59211bart 11 months ago
actually these shirts are NOT $13, they are $20...whatever Im gettin one! :)
TrustorBust716 11 months ago
@TrustorBust716 that's because the video was uploaded last year
59211bart 11 months ago
@59211bart haha my bad!
TrustorBust716 11 months ago
hahaha am getting all teary hahaha
robifox 11 months ago
Number of studies reveal that kids raised by gay couples have a lot more stress to deal with, resulting in depression, suicidal tendencies, sadness, emotional trauma. So to the people who filmed this, I don't care what you do with your junk under your undies, don't involve children into your pantomime of marriage. If you wanna get "married" and form a family try to do the real thing.
IDareToSpeak 11 months ago
@IDareToSpeak "I don't care what you do with your junk under your undies"
Thank you DareToSpeak for speaking out. However, it is exactly what these people do with their junk under their undies that has escalated disease at a terrible financial and social cost to society. Heterosexual society as a whole has a perfect right to expose and outlaw unnatural behaviour that imposes such a cost on it, and diverts funds from other legitimate research such as cancer. So I AM concerned (more)
OneJohnFiveTwelve 11 months ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve Escalated disease? Are you listening to yourself? HETEROSEXUAL people escalate disease too. It's called SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES. Not HOMOSEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES. Stupid bigot.
sk8rj04 11 months ago
@sk8rj04 "Not HOMOSEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES. "
You have chosen to call me a "stupid bigot" rather than actually debate what I've said. Of course ANY promiscuous behaviour will spread disease whether homo or hetero. And that is just the point: promiscuity is a central feature of homosexual behaviour. But not only is promiscuity central, so is thrusting the penis into another man's rectum, which in itself is dangerous behaviour because the lining of the rectum (more)
OneJohnFiveTwelve 11 months ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve Hi, i did debate with what you said. you responded to it. And I'm not calling just anyone who doesn't agree with what I say a bigot. Just the ones who are. And also, not all homosexuals use nitrate to heighten sexual pleasure, because you know what? It is sexually satisfying. As you've clearly never done it, you have no way to say that it isn't. And just because SOME people are okay with cheating on their wives, doesnt mean we all are. Most of us HATE vaginas!
sk8rj04 11 months ago 3
@sk8rj04 lining of the rectum was never designed to be adequate to this misuse. Tears are common, and semen (itself an immune system compromiser) escape, together with foeces and its filthy bacteria directly into the bloodstream. Add to this the use of nitrate drugs to heighten sexual pleasure (after all, homosexual acts are not real sex, so are not, on their own so sexually satisfying) and you have an assault on the immune system. Then simply follow the stats and have dozens (more)
OneJohnFiveTwelve 11 months ago
@sk8rj04 (continued) and have dozens, if not literally hundreds of homosexual partners and the word "escalate" becomes entirely applicable. Add to that the fact that many homosexual partners "go both ways", take the diseases home to their wives and you have the totally innocent suffering.
Now, Sk8, I suggest you go and look up your local GLB&T website for this information. You seem to be closed off to listening to anyone else, calling anyone who disagrees with you a "stupid bigot". (more)
OneJohnFiveTwelve 11 months ago
@sk8rj04 (continued) a "stupid bigot".
And by the way, I only dealt with the most basic act of homosexual behaviour. Do you want to talk about other homosexual behaviours and how they relate to ... "escalate"?
OneJohnFiveTwelve 11 months ago
@IDareToSpeak So I AM concerned. The whole argument about the privacy of the bedroom is a furphy. We don't allow murder, paedophilia, incest or any other behaviour detrimental to society as a whole to continue just because its done in the bedroom (and neither do we grace those behaviours with the term "human rights" comparing them to, for example, the fight of minority and black races for equality).
OneJohnFiveTwelve 11 months ago
Yes, let's get little 10 year old kids to say FUCK HATE!
YEAH!
FUCK IT IN THE ASS LIKE THE HOMOSEXUAL LITTLE BITCH IT FUCKING IS!
Seriously... I'm all for gay marriage, but this video is just fucking stupid.
Reapex1 1 year ago
@papadrugio Its your right to have that opinion. I just hope you would have the same attitude if an anti-gay group posted a video in a similar medium which also featured children cursing saying things like "F gay ppl" you can imagine the possible posts. Note that I'm not saying you would have to be pleased about the message, you could be flat out pissed and that's your right, but you would believe that the medium was a fair one? Before you say, but I'm right ,realize everyone feels thus.
temp1arX 1 year ago
All in favor of forbidding single parenting raise your hands; apparently it is a great absurd, not having one of the parents.
isagcastro 1 year ago
@isagcastro "...a great absurd...". No, it isn't an absurdity. Sometimes it is necessary (eg domestic violence. No-one could sensibly argue single-parenthood as having an inherent evolutionary advantage).
However, single parent-hood IS a tragedy.
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
I bought a hoodie. I've got mutiple compliments on it! FCKH8 bitches! :) I love my gay friends. :D
SkankingJesus 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve I have a link for you;
Search Zach Wahls Speech
click on the first video in the list
.....watch it really and tell me how this man is "a tragically twisted" individual from being brought up in a gay home
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
@GoldenLuckyCharm If, in a 3 minute presentation he were unable to keep up the "well-adjusted image", wouldn't he indeed be a mess? And perhaps, like many who have pushed through adversity, he IS well-adjusted. After all, as a businessman with a large, successful tutoring business (“Iowa City Learns”) he is indeed an exception at 19. He can't know though what it would have been like to have a Dad. He’s been robbed of that.
One example – either way – cannot prove a general affect.
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve How is it adversity? Its not that uncommon a situation for gay parents to raise a child. What does it matter if he didn't have a Dad, he is a contributing member of society. There are people who have a mom and dad who contribute a lot less than that young man.and to me you seem to kind of contradict yourself. You say this video should be enough to prove a bad effect, yet my example of a good video cannot prove a general affect. How does that work?
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
@GoldenLuckyCharm "What does it matter if he didn't have a Dad"
Are you REALLY saying that Dads are redundant?
"There are people who have a mom and dad who contribute a lot less than that young man". True. I said he was exceptional.
"You say this video should be enough to prove a bad effect, yet my example of a good video cannot prove a general affect. How does that work?"
Simple. Its easy to hide many ill effects for 3 minutes, but when you display it for the world to see its not hidden.
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve I'm saying two parents of the same gender can contribute as much to raising a child as two heterosexual parents. Thats what i was implying by saying what did it matter that he didn't have a dad. His moms obviously raised him well. I don't think that speech 'hid ill effects' nor do i think he is an exception. I personally know many successful individuals, raised in gay homes, as well as gay couples currently raising children, and based on what i've seen, their parenting...cont
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
@GoldenLuckyCharm "I'm saying two parents of the same gender can contribute as much to raising a child as two heterosexual parents." Therefore you are saying gender is irrelevant. You are saying there is no difference, that neither men, nor women have anything unique to their gender to contribute. It may not worry you that you are denying everything that is Biblical concerning the role of gender in the home, but are you aware that you are denying a multitude of studies that point to the (more)
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve and you're saying each gender always contributes the same things, you are lumping the role of "genders" into groups. I'm saying they can teach their child good manners, and be good role models by their polite behavior, and instill good values of character in their child. If they are honest people who will pass that on, then no gender does not matter. Single parents raise children too and while statistically that might predispose them to difficulties, the majority do fine.
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
@GoldenLuckyCharm (continued) that point to the different qualities that Dads and Mums provide? Mums provide the caring, nurturing environment. Dad's provide stability, guidance, the male role model. That perhaps oversimplifies it, but you get my drift?
I thank God that I had both a Mum and a Dad who remained faithful to each other until death parted them. They gave a wonderful example.
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve I know they do provide different qualities typically, but that doesn't mean a child is hopelessly doomed in character if they get a slightly different upbringing. Two parents of the same gender, or a single parent for that matter, can raise a good child.
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve parenting methods are as effective at raising a good person, a contributing member of society as any straight couple
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
@GoldenLuckyCharm "...contributing member of society as any straight couple".
There is always, of course the child themselves. Parents are not the ONLY influence on a young person's life, tho' they have the potential to be the most influential. It isn't surprising that a young chap brought up by two lesbians who are caring people will look favourably on homosexuality (as does the young chap in your example) as a valid lifestyle. He has experienced nothing else.
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve Well, then on the flip side, you (and I) have experienced nothing else but being brought up in a straight home, so you think that is the valid lifestyle with the least dangers. I agree young people have many things to influence them, and sometimes they specifically go against what parents are trying to get them to believe, but if whatever gender the parents are they are honest caring people, they will do their best at raising someone who embraces the same honesty they do.
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
Comment removed
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@OneJohnFiveTwelve So how is this one video, proving a bad effect? In all honesty, its not 'corrupting children' its just a word. They're going to hear it by the time they get to high school anyway.... and the purpose of it isn't the word, it was to get it noticed (which is obviously effective what with all the discussion on this vid)
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
i love internet homo-haters. my mind pictures them as those sad, pathetic guys whose opinions nobody actually bother to listen, or sometimes as some poor guy that had his girlfriend leaving him for some random hot chick... Ok, i know this last scenario isn't likely, but... From where i stand, for someone to believe that love, homo or not, is a matter of choice, they were never in love - i can only feel sorry for them. you're going to heaven? good for you. at least i LIVED.
isagcastro 1 year ago
well this is to the 68 people who hate this video it doesnt affect us gay people you'r all probarly some redneck, hillbilly bastards thinking oh that video wants gay rights so lets dislike because i have nothing else to do except look up gay on youtube to be perfectly honest you have a problem get over it or dont look up gay on youtube and to all my gays over in america i<3u stay strong and dont let the hillbillies affect you xx
TimeToTakePowerBack 1 year ago
Great video!
Take a look to this video because it's also amaizing!
v=GafppzC2OfE
PortugalForYou 1 year ago
fck all types of h8. H8 just taints our precious little world and it is merely poison to our souls...
MsMiaJo 1 year ago 48
John, in all your arguing about religion and how homosexuality around, you haven't once that I've seen addressed the issues raised in this video. In addition, getting a marriage license in no way involves religion, it involves the government. As for the children issue? It's been proven repeatedly that children raised in a homosexual household are NO worse off than children raises in a heterosexual household.
MelficeCyrum 1 year ago 42
@MelficeCyrum "...issues raised in this video".
From memory, the video raised no real issues. It was an excuse to cram a video with the 4 letter word through the mouths of children far too young to understand the issues.
It did, of course raise the question of "hate", that imaginary quality assumed by homosexuals to belong to anyone who disagrees with homosexual behaviour.
Through my posts I have argued the real issues: Disease, social and human cost and have responded to religious (more)
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@MelficeCyrum (continued) ...and have RESPONDED to religious argument and questions.
I almost forgot: The video also raised the scenario of homosexuals "marrying" each other. The very notion of legitimizing perverted behaviour that carries enormous disease, social, human and economic costs by giving it the title of "marriage" is abhorrent. (more)
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@MelficeCyrum (continued)
Regarding children raised in a homosexual environment, I find it impossible to believe that any thinking person could really believe that it would have no affect on their outlook, at bare minimum.
You can "prove" anything with studies so designed. The facts are vastly different. Try Googling and look up some studies not funded by homosexuals, government departments and politicians who want to court the "gay" agenda. Repeatedly you'll find (more).
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@MelficeCyrum (continued) ...tragically twisted kids. The fact of the increased domestic violence, the short average duration of supposed stable homosexual relationships (something like 2-3 years) compared to heterosexual relationships and the increased promiscuity while in those relationships should be enough to tell anyone that it is no way to bring up a precious, innocent child.
The foul language and seething hatred within this video should be sufficient too.
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve for factual counters to your argument please see the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the American Psychoanalytic Association, the National Association of Social Workers, the Child Welfare League of America, the North American Council on Adoptable Children and the Canadian Psychological Association.
KozySpike 1 year ago
@KozySpike Sorry Kozy, but your "appeal to authority" cannot hide the facts. I think you need to read my posts again.
The APA is hardly a credible authority. Their DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) is a joke. With each edition they get together and ruminate, and vote over what new "conditions" they have encountered that they can give a name and include in the manual. Once in the manual they can prescribe for that condition and claim a fee. EG "Shyness" is in there, (more)
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@KozySpike (continued) Shyness is in there with a grand name, of course. "Social Anxiety Disorder" I think it was.
Homosexuality used to be in it but has been removed. So you see, as far as the APA is concerned a "shy" person is mentally ill, whereas a homosexual person is quite normal.
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve let's pretend you're right. (you aren't, but for the sake of argument, let's pretend). Even if you are right, you still need to discredit 10 highly recognized and trusted organizations on child welfare who are in favor of gay parenting. Go.
KozySpike 1 year ago
@KozySpike "to discredit 10 highly recognized”. Here? No. You’ll just give me 10 more… and 10 more, and say “let’s pretend”. You see, there are hundreds of those. YOU only scratched the surface.
Instead you have to look below the surface, at the huge wealth and political clout of this “oppressed community”. You say I’m not right but you don’t say about what. So first, let’s revisit the APA. The NGLTF with its annual budget in 1994 of over a million and 18,000 members is credited with (more)
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@KozySpike (Cont’d) credited with persuading the APA to remove homosexuality from its DSM (no doubt with help from the Association of Gay & Lesbian Psychiatrists). This gave homosexual leaders access to the White House, through aide Midge Constanza. Several pro-homo statutes were intro’d to Congress.
That’s a smaller lobby group with a small budget. You have LAMBDA, a homosexual legal organisation persuing test case litigation across America with about 50 cases at a given time. (more)
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@KozySpike (Cont’d) given time. There’s the Human Rights Campaign Fund, a homosexual political action fund with 750,000 members and supporters which spent over $7 mill in 2008 to elect specific candidates to office. There’s GLAAD, which opposes any negative media portrayal of homosexuals and puts positive spin. There’s the ACLU – not officially homosexual, but very powerful and committed to homosexual “rights”.
The effects of these organisations is evident even in “The Nation”s May 3 (more)
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@KozySpike (cont’d) May 3 1993 article by Kopkind: “younger gay men and “baby dykes”… rapidly reconfiguring American values, redesigning sensibilities and REMODELING POLITICS”.
There are many, many more homosexual associations with their fingers in every pie, lobbying Congress, influencing the media and producing very sub-standard studies that lack basic controls (such as blind-control groups) simply to push their story. I can give examples of homosexuals leading these. Would you like them?
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@KozySpike (cont’d) like them? At the same time they hide from the public the desperately sordid story of their actual behaviour (source: CDC), and when the facts come to light of their increased disease, suicide and substance abuse and their denials no longer work, they blame their deep depression on the heterosexual community for… wait for it… “homophobia” (that word they made up themselves to prevent honest debate), an excuse which does not, cannot stand scrutiny.
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve I never listed a homo-friendly organization. If you refer to my list again, they are all organizations solely oriented toward child welfare. Those are the ones you need to discredit. I'm assuming they know more than you on the subject of child development. Unless you, yourself are a child welfare expert? Here's that list again, (next post). You have three options: discredit all of them, prove yourself to be more knowledgeable, or concede to their findings. The choice is yours.
KozySpike 1 year ago
the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychoanalytic Association, the National Association of Social Workers, the Child Welfare League of America, the North American Council on Adoptable Children and the Canadian Psychological Association.
KozySpike 1 year ago
@KozySpike "(source: CDC)"
By the way, say the word and I'll give you that information - right here for everyone to read - from the Center for Diseases Control on just what behaviour homosexuals actually engage in, and the resultant rise in diseases
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve I doubt your abilities to produce any counter arguments to the ones I've presented (you still have yet to discredit 9 major organizations on child welfare, or prove yourself more knowledgeable) just as much as I doubt your ability to use English; "Resultant" is a noun, not properly used the way you did, you could call the rise in diseases "a resultant", but cannot call them "resultant diseases." For the adjective form, you need "resulting." Your credibility is dwindling.
KozySpike 1 year ago
@KozySpike
"Your credibility is dwindling".
Well, you're indeed trying hard, but you are incorrect.
From the first online dictionary I googled:
re·sul·tant (r-zltnt)
adj.
Issuing or following as a consequence or result.
The second meaning is a noun. The first an adjective. Merriam Webster agrees as well.
Oh copme on you can do better than that to try and discredit me. Why don't you try to focus on the diseases spread by homosexual acts and discredit me on that?
OneJohnFiveTwelve 11 months ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve You're conveniently overlooking the fact that you still, yes still, have yet to discredit 9 organizations on child welfare who are in favor of homosexual parenting, or prove yourself more knowledgeable. Notice when I brought up your misuse of that word, I coupled it with this reminder. Your reply to that comment gave no effort to oblige. Even if you are right about the APA, you haven't shown yourself to be right about the 9 other organizations, nor made any attempt to.
KozySpike 11 months ago
@KozySpike "I brought up your misuse of that word". You are a very stubborn person aren't you? I have shown you from 2 dictionaries yet you still refuse to acknowledge and apologise for your error.
Earlier in my posts (4 weeks ago) I pointed out to YOU that you only scratched the surface of organisations that approve of homosexual behaviour. Instead of spending precious time investigating each of those 10 to have you then say, "yeah, but what about this 10", I showed you - demonstrated - (more)
OneJohnFiveTwelve 11 months ago
@KozySpike (continued) demonstrated the political, social and legal clout that the hyperactive homosexual lobby wields.
So to answer your question about these 10 "respected, trusted" organisations, how can any organisation that would condone behaviour that spreads diseases like a plague by dignifying it with the term "marriage" and placing children in such an environment be respected and trusted?
You cannot deny the disease comment and retain credibility. Just look up your local GLBT site.
OneJohnFiveTwelve 11 months ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve Where do your stats on homosexual relationships,& their length come from? (they can't be marriage stats since most places they AREN'T ALLOWED TO GET MARRIED) and um comparative 2 hetero relationships? Where "Larry King is getting his 8th divorce,Liz Taylor is possibly getting married for a 9th time,Britney Spears had a 55 hour marriage,and Jesse James & Tiger Woods are screwing EVERYTHING? This must be wonderful logic you have to propose that hetero relationships r more stable
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
@GoldenLuckyCharm Norway has had de-facto same-sex marriage since the early nineties. But a “relationship” has never necessarily implied marriage even in the heterosexual community. Homosexual couples have certainly had care of children.
Yes, you can show the decline of marriage in the hetero community. It has been a process resulting from weakened marriage laws (eg no-fault divorce decades ago). Currently however, even tho critically weakened, hetero marriage is still far stabler. (more)
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve I don't think the 50% divorce rate makes hetero marriages more stable personally. And the stat from 1994, that could've changes so much in nearly 20 years, not really reliable. In all honesty i think ALL studies have bias somewhere, its just finding one with the most minimal bias...all studies trying to prove either side. I don't think ALL government studies are biased , you just have to evaluate the legitimacy of each study.
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
@GoldenLuckyCharm (continued) ….still far stabler. Its not rocket science that when marriage took years to dissolve through a fault establishing process, people went into marriage with far more thought and certainty. Illigitimacy was very low. Crime was low. Women and children out at night didn’t have to fear for their safety.
In every country where homosexual marriage has been affirmed, marriage itself has suffered over the next decade or so. Illegitimacy statistics show this. (more)
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve and the fact that "every" country where homosexual marriage has been affirmed, marriage itself has suffered over the next decade or so. Illegitimacy statistics show this......those countries don't have our laws, values, rights the exact same, so whos to say it'll have that same negative effect here. People in the 50s/60s thought interracial marriage would do the same thing, with similar arguments. I say they should have the right to marry who they really love.
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
@GoldenLuckyCharm "those countries don't have our laws, values, rights the exact same, so whos to say it'll have that same negative effect here."
I think you're drawing a very long bow ;-)
"...who they really love. " First, according to statistics, very few homosexuals will take up on marriage. A tiny minority. It is validation that they are wanting, and marriage is the final frontier that says society regards homosexuality as an equal alternative. Second, the English word "love" (more)
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve all i meant about the countries was that the situations aren't the same so its kind of a false comparison or prediction, because we can't really tell what it will do until its implemented.I mean we can guess all day but until it happens its really all just speculation.Statistics really are a observation of whats happened but ANYTHING can happen in future, there are hundreds of un-forseen factors that make the future and results unpredictable even with the most scientific stats
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve and so whats wrong with them wanting validation? Again, stats might comment on something, but really stats can't speak for the community there is no way any stat can include every person, just the nature of statistics, the target group is never totally represented. So what if the part that do want marriage is a large number, and just didn't respond to that survey? Can really skew it. IF people want to marry, its for one of the 2 "love types" you mentioned. And we don't know...
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve ...we don't know how many are of each type (really) until we allow it. and why shouldn't we? Honestly, you've presented all these stats on how it would damage the institution of marriage based on the current rates of partners they have, stability, etc, but we don't KNOW until we let all those who want to marry do so, there might be quiet shy members of that community who want to, but don't respond to stats and surveys where you present info from. D
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve Domestic violence? there are unreported and false reported crimes... Again, this is all similar to the arguments brought up in the discussion on interracial marriage, and once implemented those predictions turned out to be mostly false. Perhaps, because of the way they have to hide it makes them feel insecure, which results in the higher numbers, and lesbian women having male partners because they don't feel accepted enough to come out? Just food for thought...
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
@GoldenLuckyCharm (Continued) love covers everything from sexual feelings and expression to unconditional love. When the Bible talks of love, it means only the latter. Homosexual "love" majors on the former, on sexual gratification. Again, I refer to my post on homosexual behaviour (say the word...).
Unconditional love is right behaviour. It is behaviour you should indeed exercise towards your male friends, but it doesn't mean having pseudo-sex with them.
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve (cont) who they really love. I dont think they'll make MORE mistakes than straight people do in thinking who they love is the one, and trying to make relationships work out. I'm not saying they're foolproof in relationships, but they should be allowed to show their devotion through marriage as easily as straight people do.
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago
@GoldenLuckyCharm "I dont think they'll make MORE mistakes than straight people do in thinking who they love is the one, and trying to make relationships work out."
Statistics show that homosexuals supposedly stable relationships have many times more "illicit" relationships that heterosexuals. They have far higher domestic violence. Here's a shock: even lesbians on average have more sex WITH MEN that heterosexual women do.
OneJohnFiveTwelve 1 year ago
@OneJohnFiveTwelve Both groups have examples of good and bad relationships.Really what it comes down 2 is why can someone else impose restrictions on another's sexuality? It might bother them for religious reasons, medical reasons,etc,they don't have 2 do it!They can be with their heterosexual partner,but why do they have the right to restrict another person when it has nothing 2 do with them?One's character shouldn't have 2 be determined by who the law says you can fully express ur love 2...
GoldenLuckyCharm 1 year ago