Love the research, but u can't call anything Antichrist, when it existed centuries b4 the existence of the Christ. 2) Christianity existed 325 years after the death of Christ! 3) Christ was not a Christian he was a Jew! and that's the facts.
@kytekutter no disrespect, love the video, appreciate it, but when you say Christianity is the only religion that needs a savior, your wrong. Judaism needed Moses, Zoroastrianism needed Zoroaster and so forth. the main religions all preach the same thing, oneness, love mankind, unity, and total compliance to the one God's law.
@RealWorldNewsOrg thats the single version of the Bible he promotes later on in the series iirc.
even if the direct translation were to be "come let us make ourselves famous" coupled with the other ideas in the verse which would imply being famous through use of creating a holy site....it would still be for selfish reasons.
Through Jesus we know that we should act selfless...no selfish. So i think both ideas would get the point across...though in differing fashions.
@hexusziggurat I think all people should use the Kjv, it's the simplest to understand, and it's closer to it's original text. The other versions throw people off sometimes and if you look through each bible as a whole, certain versus are missing from certain bibles that are in the Kjv, if your a bible believing Christian or a person studying it to try to get an understanding or know how of Christianity become Christian etc, you'd miss parts or might become confused.
@hexusziggurat And not to mention that in the bible itself it states we are not to edit, change,take out or corrupt it at all, not even the smallest of things.Translation to a different language would not do that, only a person willfully translating it wrong, or out taking something out.They compared all the versions on the basis of reading comprehension and stated that the KJV is the easiest to understand and has the least syllables, so why use other versions if we already have an optimum one.
@hexusziggurat Which was the 1st English one authorized mind you. Also, with more version being made and volumes things are still being changed and omitted, we should not support that. By 2025 who knows what the never versions will look like, it'll probably be a total flip from what it actually means. Just use the KJV, it's logical and I don't see why anyone would fight it unless you personally have something to gain from it. The KJV is the best suited in English,period.
@Shadowlooker12 i certainly agree with that. As the only beings really agining anything by radically changing concepts in the Bible are those setting out for a personal cause or the cause of those willing to fashion "deception" as a tool for war against those that support the ideals of the Bible.
@Siva3Enthroned KJV bible is the closest version in English to it's original text in Hebrew, the other versions have on purpose been made with more complicated words, omit versus(Take out) change versus and words in certain parts. With the KJV(Original Kjv Not New KJV) you won't miss any specifics and you will be able to grasp what is meant as a whole. I read the differences from 3-5 different bibles in a few versus a few days ago, it's insane.
@Siva3Enthroned And they do it under the guise of copy right law, whoever buys the right to bible print, has the copy right law, that means if you want to print your own bibles and bible publication, you cannot print the exact same text that is already in circulation word for word, which is what we are suppose to do, to make it a New book, you must change, alter, take out and rearrange words and phrases in it. This is why The Kjv original authorized is the best one to read.
@Siva3Enthroned It's translated directly from the Hebrew, Not Greek text, it's the first English version and has not been altered due to the nonsensical copy right purchase law. Many people know about this that preach and choose not to use KJV because it suits their own interpretation of publication. A lot of versions do not even put that Jesus is the son of God, meaning you can sell these versions to individuals who do not beleive it, and still make money, many things are twisted here man.
Love the research, but u can't call anything Antichrist, when it existed centuries b4 the existence of the Christ. 2) Christianity existed 325 years after the death of Christ! 3) Christ was not a Christian he was a Jew! and that's the facts.
sugars01 2 weeks ago
@sugars01 I think your confusing Christianity with Catholicism. Yes, Jesus was a Jew who is debating that?
kytekutter 1 week ago
@kytekutter no disrespect, love the video, appreciate it, but when you say Christianity is the only religion that needs a savior, your wrong. Judaism needed Moses, Zoroastrianism needed Zoroaster and so forth. the main religions all preach the same thing, oneness, love mankind, unity, and total compliance to the one God's law.
0thatdudewill0 2 weeks ago
While your interpritation is likely correct, the word "NAME" in Genesis 11:4 means name, renown, fame, famous, but not salvation.
I would suggest that your use the True Word of God in English, the KJV, rather than a corrupt version.
RealWorldNewsOrg 10 months ago
@RealWorldNewsOrg thats the single version of the Bible he promotes later on in the series iirc.
even if the direct translation were to be "come let us make ourselves famous" coupled with the other ideas in the verse which would imply being famous through use of creating a holy site....it would still be for selfish reasons.
Through Jesus we know that we should act selfless...no selfish. So i think both ideas would get the point across...though in differing fashions.
hexusziggurat 10 months ago
@hexusziggurat I think all people should use the Kjv, it's the simplest to understand, and it's closer to it's original text. The other versions throw people off sometimes and if you look through each bible as a whole, certain versus are missing from certain bibles that are in the Kjv, if your a bible believing Christian or a person studying it to try to get an understanding or know how of Christianity become Christian etc, you'd miss parts or might become confused.
Shadowlooker12 9 months ago
@hexusziggurat And not to mention that in the bible itself it states we are not to edit, change,take out or corrupt it at all, not even the smallest of things.Translation to a different language would not do that, only a person willfully translating it wrong, or out taking something out.They compared all the versions on the basis of reading comprehension and stated that the KJV is the easiest to understand and has the least syllables, so why use other versions if we already have an optimum one.
Shadowlooker12 9 months ago
@hexusziggurat Which was the 1st English one authorized mind you. Also, with more version being made and volumes things are still being changed and omitted, we should not support that. By 2025 who knows what the never versions will look like, it'll probably be a total flip from what it actually means. Just use the KJV, it's logical and I don't see why anyone would fight it unless you personally have something to gain from it. The KJV is the best suited in English,period.
Shadowlooker12 9 months ago
@Shadowlooker12 i certainly agree with that. As the only beings really agining anything by radically changing concepts in the Bible are those setting out for a personal cause or the cause of those willing to fashion "deception" as a tool for war against those that support the ideals of the Bible.
hexusziggurat 9 months ago
@RealWorldNewsOrg Uh, isn't the KJV editted?
Siva3Enthroned 10 months ago
@Siva3Enthroned KJV bible is the closest version in English to it's original text in Hebrew, the other versions have on purpose been made with more complicated words, omit versus(Take out) change versus and words in certain parts. With the KJV(Original Kjv Not New KJV) you won't miss any specifics and you will be able to grasp what is meant as a whole. I read the differences from 3-5 different bibles in a few versus a few days ago, it's insane.
Shadowlooker12 9 months ago
@Siva3Enthroned And they do it under the guise of copy right law, whoever buys the right to bible print, has the copy right law, that means if you want to print your own bibles and bible publication, you cannot print the exact same text that is already in circulation word for word, which is what we are suppose to do, to make it a New book, you must change, alter, take out and rearrange words and phrases in it. This is why The Kjv original authorized is the best one to read.
Shadowlooker12 9 months ago
@Siva3Enthroned It's translated directly from the Hebrew, Not Greek text, it's the first English version and has not been altered due to the nonsensical copy right purchase law. Many people know about this that preach and choose not to use KJV because it suits their own interpretation of publication. A lot of versions do not even put that Jesus is the son of God, meaning you can sell these versions to individuals who do not beleive it, and still make money, many things are twisted here man.
Shadowlooker12 9 months ago