Great character from topolov, not letting people forget who really is "the boss". Actually kasparov WON this super-tournament, (his umpteenth) depite losing this last game.
I remember in 2003 when the so-called "rising stars" in russia started saying(In russian) that gary was a "spent force" and that it was "time for the new generation" to "move on past him"
Gary, clearly angry, amazed everybody by taking part in the 2004 russian championship. He crushed all "the rising stars" and won it easily!
Yes, you have many of the top ten players on this list. But the fact that you do not have Paul Morphy on this list is evidence of your stupidity. Morphy was and will be one of the Immortal Chess Gods. He is the one player, who if alive today, with his incredible photographic memory and pure inate chess instinct, would compete and win against the greatest of today. He probably wouldnt have to but he could study, learn, and memorize modern theory. Morphy is easily top three. Period.
@savannahjoel u just called one of the best players ever stupid, i dont think u understand the level of wisdom i posess. I suggested moles were a sign of mental illness then looked up on wikipedia that during the middle ages people thought to be demonically possessed had moles on their bodies. Do u know what kind of mind u need for that? a mind from the stars.
@savannahjoel morphy isnt top 3 why? b /c he didn't play good enough competition and morphy had a weakness in closed positions if im stupid then your retarded. you know nothing about chess
Well, this was back when Topalov actually was somewhat friendly. Before his manager Danailov took over his life and made him into his own Bulgarian mafia puppet.
much of what kasparov learned was from older games, including fischer's. he learned from their mistakes, and i think thats the only reason for which he would be better, simply because he had more theory to work with. also, if you consider the modern level of opposition, kasparov's feats are even more impressive than fischer's. i just wish fischer hadn't vanished like that.
You are right in that current players are "stronger" than they were in the age of Morphy, or Cappablanca or even Tal and Fischer. You have to take into account the training mechanism has changed. What we would have seen if Fischer or Nimzovich had a resource like chessbase. At this point it is like comparing apples to oranges.
I have a bit more respect for Topalov now. Kasparov is indeed a chess legend, who dominated the highest level for about 20 years. He was simply the BEST of his era. It would have been great to see him play Fischer, when they were both at their best.
@NixxerJixxerWixxer I don't care what you are, but if you never had a match against Kasparov, please do not use profane expressions about someone who was good enough to get one and win.
WRONG. Magnus Carlsen is the new talent and he's clearly on the rise to become an even better substitude for Kasparov. The two are working together now.
this is the way a man should talk about a legend (kasparov) even though he won kasparov but he still says that there will be no any other legends like kasparov. smart speech by topalov. bravo!
Topalov shows humility and great class in this interview. He knows he is not the superb genius that Kasparov was, and publicly acknowledges it, as well as recognizing the vacuum left. The #1 rated player, the only one above 2800 ELO, and while improving - he will never be quite as famous as the man who's name is synonymous with the game of kings... but this does not mean he should be in any way disrespected.
Many of the comments shame the game. Give respect to the greats, they deserve it.
fisher is greater than both, but its funny if a chess player beats someone his opponent is always great... even though kasparov was really a great player but i miss the times when a chessplayer said when asked if his opponent plays good says i think he plays good piano...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
true abot the chess today its all about preparation. i am not very good at chess but i find it boring to play only learned moves, it`s not interesting , there is no thrill. my opinioin .
Uhm, chess is alot more then learning moves. People that win soley because of learned moves never even get close to top level chess players. It's art on a whole new level, something you ovbiously are totally missing.
I'm impressed by his humility. Someone who beat Kasparov has every right to boast and gloat..yet he talks instead about Kasparov's greatness. That's true humility. I LIKE this guy!
topalov didn't play the game at the world championship but it's very important that player like him, shirov, carlson or anand will succeed. they make chess interesting and awesome to watch. kramnik brought chess to a dead spot even although his kind of chess is more correct.chess can't be interesting if the champions plays a draw after 25 moves in every second game! chess get much more advertency when kasparow was the champion!
I like anand and topalov's playing style. I like how he once beat Anand in 25 moves. I'm depressed that kasparov and fischer retired, because only they could bring chess to the highest level.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
all the world chess champs seem to play alot of the sissy sicilian, e4? b6!! immediately black is dictating, d4 Bg7 Bd3/Nc3? Black can keep hittin on white Nf6 with plans of g6 double fianchetto! then i keep e7 and d7 virtuous till the middle game it totally psyches out alot of players are playing moves that expect e5 or d5 or e6 and when you don't play that they get confounded and frustrated, then the knights provoke and harass Nb4! sometimes h5 and a5 screw them up too lol :P
What Veselin is saying is that the next generation of chess players are the ones who are taught by computer and have a more positional playing style. You can no longer outplay your opponent by making unclear sacrifices over the board. Chess has now become 95% preparation.
Thank you for the post - an historically important video and Topalov articulates himself very well - sadness for Chess in spite of his own personal vistory.
kasparov is a legend... topalov is the shadow of kaspy, he will never be as brilliant...
Magnus the chess prodigy will be the next world champion, he will probably dominate a whole new era like Kasparov did, and I think this kid will be more brilliant than Kasparov... "this kid will have no problem" in the words of kaspy
Well Topalov still plays more interesting and entertaining chess then Kramnik. Nothing more pathetic then bunch of loosers making stupid remarks about two great players.
I find it humorous that supporters of Topalov, like x33mmm, still say that Kramnik had used fritz 10. You could probably easier find a large horde of gold than prove it, which everyone knows he didn't anyway. You people just have to accept the fact that he tried to play with Kramnik's mind, got a free point, and still lost.
kasparov best ever Look at the numbers and stats nobody has ever been as good and consistent as him My only regret was that kasparov never faced fischer in the 80's but i still think kasparov would beat him
Karpov best ever.He factically played Kasparov to a draw in all of their championship matches.Besides,take into consideration that if we compare these two russians,Karpov has done more things in his life than just playing chess-he is the bakalaur of mathematics as well.
I like Karpov too, but when it comes to Kasparov vs Karpov, one of them was world chess champion for almost two decades, the other for just a few years. Unfortunately the facts speak for themselves on that matter.
Karpov was world champion for 10 years, Kasparov for 15 years. When Kasparov became world champion he was down 5-0, but Karpov lost his nerve and allowed Kasparov to come back and win. Kasparov never dominated Karpov (12 years his senior) and always nudged out victory in the world championship matches.
I appreciate the background, and as I said, I really like Karpov--but my point was just as you stated. Kasparov beat Karpov more than the other way around. One of the beauties of chess is the lack of ambiguity in things like this. When a WC and a contender meet, who's better is found out shortly thereafter.
yeah and by a strange coincidence it showed that fisher demands of having draws not counted was unrealistic what strange coincidence, what luck that the soviet system had no say in chess...
lol, there is definetly some logic to Fischers demand! Still, the statistics I wrote above concern the strength of Kasparov and Karpov respectively and in comparison. I wrote the comment as a response to calibansfury who seem to underestimate just how close the WC matches between the two russians were.
Of course, if you asked Fisher (before we lost him)... Then all of the K-K games were artificial constructs and the result of a soviet plot against him, the only true genius of chess.
listen veselin topalov is the best chess player in the world not him but kramnik is cheater because he used computer program against topalov called fritz 10 he is bulgarian me too bulgaria is the greatest nation fuc your mums loser suck it
That man is not so ugly as he apperars on that video, and you see he is a magnificent person. Hes ability on chess is still not fully developed, He will be much better than Kasparov. So, respect that great man pls.
you've got to admire the guy's humility... I think he's right, but I can't imagine many other sports players being able to say something similar lets say in football (soccer)
Shamnik has more to be ashamed of, how can he calim to play a 'World Championship' When aainst Leko it was on a max of 14 games and then Topalov it was 12 games.
Dude he's not freaking here to gave an English lesson with your sorry @ss. He's not even American or British, and he's here to talk about Kasparov, so f!ck u.
Jesus u are so bad persons... always trying to pull people down because of their appearences... maybe he isnt pretty but his QI might BE AT LEAST 10000000000000x MORE than u.U are anti-human at ur comments. u have no right to come in youtube and speak dirty about people, HES A HUMAN-pretty or not, ur the same has him!
I don't think he has a pathetic voice. But even if he did, that does not detract from his BEAUTIFUL brain and legandery status. This Guy is SO humble and cool and if all men were like him we would be living in Utopia.
Great character from topolov, not letting people forget who really is "the boss". Actually kasparov WON this super-tournament, (his umpteenth) depite losing this last game.
I remember in 2003 when the so-called "rising stars" in russia started saying(In russian) that gary was a "spent force" and that it was "time for the new generation" to "move on past him"
Gary, clearly angry, amazed everybody by taking part in the 2004 russian championship. He crushed all "the rising stars" and won it easily!
TEDOVSKY 1 month ago
you know i am bulgarian and i like how he shows respect for kasparov but i think the chess world got blindsided by carlsen.
ffezz 2 months ago
topalov was right, anand, topalov, kramnik, leko, good players but not like kasparov
smex70 3 months ago
Mikhail Tal this is number one !
TheApocalipse67 4 months ago
Yes, you have many of the top ten players on this list. But the fact that you do not have Paul Morphy on this list is evidence of your stupidity. Morphy was and will be one of the Immortal Chess Gods. He is the one player, who if alive today, with his incredible photographic memory and pure inate chess instinct, would compete and win against the greatest of today. He probably wouldnt have to but he could study, learn, and memorize modern theory. Morphy is easily top three. Period.
savannahjoel 8 months ago
@savannahjoel u just called one of the best players ever stupid, i dont think u understand the level of wisdom i posess. I suggested moles were a sign of mental illness then looked up on wikipedia that during the middle ages people thought to be demonically possessed had moles on their bodies. Do u know what kind of mind u need for that? a mind from the stars.
warLock21X 8 months ago
@savannahjoel morphy isnt top 3 why? b /c he didn't play good enough competition and morphy had a weakness in closed positions if im stupid then your retarded. you know nothing about chess
warLock21X 8 months ago
1. Kasparov
2. Fischer
3. Alekhine
4. Capablanca
5. Karpov
6. Spassky
7. TaL
8. Petrosian
9. Botvinnik
10. Lasker
warLock21X 9 months ago
@Ironman718 true, but fischer was an anti-semitic nutjob...I simply can't respect that
goldenchocolate 1 year ago
@goldenchocolate fischer anti-semitic i didn't know this, man, that's a slap in the face! why is he?
a552bcx 11 months ago
@a552bcx Just watch: /watch?v=QryuMf8qZ0g
He was telling the truth and so he was bullied by the US government and tortured in Japan prison.
rpdigital17 11 months ago
@rpdigital17 wasn't fischer jewish or came from a jewish background, anyway, good informative video though
a552bcx 11 months ago
@goldenchocolate No, he had nothing against arabs.
rpdigital17 11 months ago
@Ironman718 what about Tal? :D
Fanggle 1 year ago
Well, this was back when Topalov actually was somewhat friendly. Before his manager Danailov took over his life and made him into his own Bulgarian mafia puppet.
PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 1 year ago
Carlsen?
joydivided23 1 year ago
Topalov is a class act. End of story.
boojum402 1 year ago 2
So who was better, Fischer or Kasparov? Did they ever play one another?
yisacknayrabin 1 year ago
@yisacknayrabin
i'd say kasparov.
much of what kasparov learned was from older games, including fischer's. he learned from their mistakes, and i think thats the only reason for which he would be better, simply because he had more theory to work with. also, if you consider the modern level of opposition, kasparov's feats are even more impressive than fischer's. i just wish fischer hadn't vanished like that.
modern fischer vs modern kasparov... i dont know.
chrism216 1 year ago
Comment removed
Ironman718 1 year ago
@Ironman718
noffence , but i actually saw a few games of morphy
and it was weak''' extremely weak
however he did have some good games but his rating was never above 2700
blackoil911 1 year ago
@blackoil911
tsssss...
back then there was no rating system.
and are obviously not familiar with the term "rating inflation", as well.
morphy was a world champion, he beat very strong players like anderssen.
and morphy hardly knew any theory.
"i actually saw a few games of morphy, and it was weak, extremely weak"
HAHAHA
oh god... youtube cracks me up sometimes. some of the quotes you will find in here...
chrism216 1 year ago
@chrism216
paul morphy doesnt even has a basic game structure sorry but just is my opinion
also players in this generations are way strong than players in the past
except for capablanca or alekhine
blackoil911 1 year ago
@blackoil911
You are right in that current players are "stronger" than they were in the age of Morphy, or Cappablanca or even Tal and Fischer. You have to take into account the training mechanism has changed. What we would have seen if Fischer or Nimzovich had a resource like chessbase. At this point it is like comparing apples to oranges.
boojum402 1 year ago
@boojum402
i said , except for Alekhine or Capablanca'''
their chess is studied by fish, kasp,karpov,carlson, anand, kramnik,topalov, ashley,
blackoil911 1 year ago
Topalov is legend. why this speech is so important. he just was never world champion.
brimackk 1 year ago
and then there was Magnus...
ddferrer 1 year ago
Magnus Carlsen is better, but they're both legends.
SSJ5VegetaV4 1 year ago
funny in his interviews he seems like a decent guy but other gms apparently think hes a jerk
spiked415 1 year ago
Very humble man, a great player also.
shawndimery 1 year ago
Also i doubt Topalov could have beaten Kasparov when he was in his prime.
sonofhendrix 1 year ago
and then came Magnus Carlsen...
iodon 1 year ago
@iodon Well Magnus has yet to win WC title.
vladan1021 1 year ago
@iodon
pff magnus is nothing''' he hasnt won jack
Anand , kasparov and kramnik are the three headed monsters in chess
blackoil911 1 year ago
wow, what a humble man
paragshah2112 1 year ago
Topalov is frank n honest. The vacuum left by Kasparov may not be filled for 1 generation.
rolandytho 1 year ago
@rolandytho His pupil may scale the same heights within 5 years. Topalov may be best of the rest.
thespacialone 1 year ago
topalov used some veselin before screwing kasparov
(lol cudnt help it! all due respect to the legend)
yousahil 1 year ago
Odd. I always thought Topolov was kind of a dick since he accused Kramnik of cheating, but now I have more respect for him.
flamingmonkey923 1 year ago
what a humble soul topalov is.
My respect to him, and congrats to him on second place in the 2010 tournament.
mooogles 1 year ago
I have a bit more respect for Topalov now. Kasparov is indeed a chess legend, who dominated the highest level for about 20 years. He was simply the BEST of his era. It would have been great to see him play Fischer, when they were both at their best.
yogiOK 1 year ago
@Ironman718 I agree...it's a shame that they never got a chance to play each other. Who would you put your money on?
VitalSigns1 1 year ago
a true sportsman and he's right Kasporov is a one time occurrence.
CE750 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
topalov is the best
quickstrike93 1 year ago
he sounds like a dying cat
NixxerJixxerWixxer 1 year ago
@NixxerJixxerWixxer
stfu fag
quickstrike93 1 year ago
@NixxerJixxerWixxer : What do you expect- he's Bulgarian.
TomDavid88 1 year ago
@TomDavid88
let me see you talking in bulgarian, fag
CaTeJIuT 1 year ago
I do hope that this whining cunt loses to Anand...Fuck You Topalov!!!!
JiggerBooWigger 1 year ago
@JiggerBooWigger Are all Indians on that level or is it just you?
JadeDAngelo 1 year ago
@JadeDAngelo
Who says I'm an Indian?
NixxerJixxerWixxer 1 year ago
@NixxerJixxerWixxer I don't care what you are, but if you never had a match against Kasparov, please do not use profane expressions about someone who was good enough to get one and win.
JadeDAngelo 1 year ago
@NixxerJixxerWixxer
topalov is the best
quickstrike93 1 year ago 4
@JiggerBooWigger
tpoalov is the best and hes gonna win
quickstrike93 1 year ago
It's nice to see Topalov showing deep respect for Kasparov despite beating him in the latter's last game
rookman64 1 year ago 7
well he didnt see carlsen coming to steal his no. 1 spot did he?
bsht123456 1 year ago
would you expect a 19 year old suddenly appearing from nowhere and getting an elo of 2813 XD
khosrow 1 year ago
sept 2011 max
pAbedaNSK 1 year ago
i heard he wears shirts to distract his opponents, better not bring that shit around me
pAbedaNSK 1 year ago
account closed..ha ha ha
gqmighty 1 year ago
WRONG. Magnus Carlsen is the new talent and he's clearly on the rise to become an even better substitude for Kasparov. The two are working together now.
esquadmiller 2 years ago
topalov rox.
patatoes67100 2 years ago
I don't know what your problem is! He is one great Bulgarian and he also speak english better than Stoichkov.
mitko093 2 years ago 6
Who cares how well he speaks English?
I thought Topalov was a Russian?
legalrule 2 years ago 6
@legalrule Bulgarian
adhdboy699 1 year ago
this is the way a man should talk about a legend (kasparov) even though he won kasparov but he still says that there will be no any other legends like kasparov. smart speech by topalov. bravo!
infidel94 2 years ago 82
This comment has received too many negative votes show
VERY QUEER FACE ON CAM LOL!!!
Frankyyourpimp 2 years ago
Class.
Strange for a Bulgarian, but great to see and makes me proud.
BGivo 2 years ago
topalovs a good player,
carlsen will not be world champion,
Kramnik >
Topalov>
Anand>
Pabedansk> all
all of you will know when somebody from USA is competing for world championship 1 yr 8 months max
pAbedaNSK 2 years ago
Gary is the best.
Was atleast.
Koroush51 2 years ago
What a pleasure it is to listen to this man.
jafe2002 2 years ago
very humble man
ArseneLupin2009 2 years ago 2
Looks a little like john tuturro.
cracknik 2 years ago
Topalov shows humility and great class in this interview. He knows he is not the superb genius that Kasparov was, and publicly acknowledges it, as well as recognizing the vacuum left. The #1 rated player, the only one above 2800 ELO, and while improving - he will never be quite as famous as the man who's name is synonymous with the game of kings... but this does not mean he should be in any way disrespected.
Many of the comments shame the game. Give respect to the greats, they deserve it.
11kaz 2 years ago 11
The only one above 2800?
MavPlaysChess 2 years ago
Topalov might have beaten Kasparov.
But Kasparov had definetely better play, both great players tho'
Shoarmaboer20 2 years ago
fisher is greater than both, but its funny if a chess player beats someone his opponent is always great... even though kasparov was really a great player but i miss the times when a chessplayer said when asked if his opponent plays good says i think he plays good piano...
IHATENEDAH 2 years ago
garry is my idol
pawndestroyer1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
professors who teach at MIT > kasparov
pAbedaNSK 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
einstein>kasparov
pabedansk>kasparov
fischer>kasparov
neurosurgeons>kasparov
pAbedaNSK 2 years ago
in what?
fiendin281 2 years ago
felt sorry for kasparov, but maybe he had it planned...anyways,topalov won for a reason...he's a damn powerful good chess player.
Manikinator 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
he didn't mention Anand when he was talking about the top players after Kasparov..
untwerf 2 years ago
If you care to listen ,he said "Vishi"
gyzyt 2 years ago 8
i stand correct. Cheers ;)
untwerf 2 years ago
corrected* learn your past participles
Gormaoul 2 years ago
What an anal comment.
stuart4010 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
untwerf ,,
he mentioned anand ,,
it was the first name ,, if you noticed he said( vishy),,, anand's first name ,,
cammon ,, he can't forget anands name ,, lol
sudanesetube 2 years ago
yes he did. He said vischy. Referring to anand
Virtualwallvirus 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
rybka helped him again? :d
lakermangmx 2 years ago
i hope not, i think hes a real jerk. but i think hes slightly better than kamsky yes
petrosian904 2 years ago
topalov is gonna beat kamsky
pAbedaNSK 3 years ago 3
To pAbedaNSK:
Nice prediction!
fatesofgreedom 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
true abot the chess today its all about preparation. i am not very good at chess but i find it boring to play only learned moves, it`s not interesting , there is no thrill. my opinioin .
soulcontrollerBG 3 years ago
Uhm, chess is alot more then learning moves. People that win soley because of learned moves never even get close to top level chess players. It's art on a whole new level, something you ovbiously are totally missing.
UnholyMasterOfMetal 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
like*
slaviKn17 3 years ago
veselin is a great player, love his style
slaviKn17 3 years ago 5
Me, too. Kasparov described him as an attacker. I like fierce, dynamic chess.
fatesofgreedom 2 years ago
Thats not humility, that IQ !
drekecdrekecadrekecu 3 years ago 8
I'm impressed by his humility. Someone who beat Kasparov has every right to boast and gloat..yet he talks instead about Kasparov's greatness. That's true humility. I LIKE this guy!
daffydoug 3 years ago 9
Kasparov is 15 wins 6 losses and 17 draws against Topalov. Of course he's not going to boast; Kasparov is still winning overall.
poepete 3 years ago 3
He is modest.
Capablanche 3 years ago
Kasparov is the best
shahnur79 3 years ago 5
Topolov is one of the strongest GMs in the world
nicolette1971 3 years ago 7
KASPAROVE=LEGEND!
HAVEK1986 3 years ago 5
and a billion x more talented
slaviKn17 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
topalov = rooster
slaviKn17 3 years ago
slaviKn17=idiot
Unimath22 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lol.. way smarter than u buddy
slaviKn17 3 years ago
i doubt that
abolisher123 3 years ago 2
google steven khais
there you will see poetic and shooting ability
slaviKn17 3 years ago
topalov didn't play the game at the world championship but it's very important that player like him, shirov, carlson or anand will succeed. they make chess interesting and awesome to watch. kramnik brought chess to a dead spot even although his kind of chess is more correct.chess can't be interesting if the champions plays a draw after 25 moves in every second game! chess get much more advertency when kasparow was the champion!
maddes111 3 years ago 5
I like anand and topalov's playing style. I like how he once beat Anand in 25 moves. I'm depressed that kasparov and fischer retired, because only they could bring chess to the highest level.
misteratoz 3 years ago 4
vaseline toplove is my fav chess player.
harshvgaus 3 years ago 13
LOL
tr1tan 3 years ago
vaseline?
toplove?
he'll be the heartrob chess player in history
lol
0viajante 2 years ago
What a humble guy !
SPbJazz 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
all the world chess champs seem to play alot of the sissy sicilian, e4? b6!! immediately black is dictating, d4 Bg7 Bd3/Nc3? Black can keep hittin on white Nf6 with plans of g6 double fianchetto! then i keep e7 and d7 virtuous till the middle game it totally psyches out alot of players are playing moves that expect e5 or d5 or e6 and when you don't play that they get confounded and frustrated, then the knights provoke and harass Nb4! sometimes h5 and a5 screw them up too lol :P
DeepGlue555 3 years ago
What Veselin is saying is that the next generation of chess players are the ones who are taught by computer and have a more positional playing style. You can no longer outplay your opponent by making unclear sacrifices over the board. Chess has now become 95% preparation.
xylyze 3 years ago 6
not necessarily. the only reason chess has been played for the past 2000 years (or something like that) is because no one can master it.
123iownu123 3 years ago 10
except for masters?
4ourthofjuly 3 years ago
lol!
Ruxistico 2 years ago
Topalov shows his class. A true professional and gentleman. Hard to find these days.
900127548 3 years ago 11
topalov is a very sharp player!
ToCan2tuViDa 3 years ago 3
very eloquent.
stone1home 4 years ago
All of you Topalov haters suck it flat
kidwon24 4 years ago
man topalov is plating so well now i believe he can rule
p.s what a respect from veselin
NuriKG 4 years ago 5
Bravo Vesko//
0VCa70D0Ra 4 years ago 3
Thank you for the post - an historically important video and Topalov articulates himself very well - sadness for Chess in spite of his own personal vistory.
PeterSodhi 4 years ago 2
16year old Magnus carlsen did beat him later in this tournament
ujmm 4 years ago
He said "Vishy" meaning Anand.
kaeschpi 4 years ago
kasparov is a legend... topalov is the shadow of kaspy, he will never be as brilliant...
Magnus the chess prodigy will be the next world champion, he will probably dominate a whole new era like Kasparov did, and I think this kid will be more brilliant than Kasparov... "this kid will have no problem" in the words of kaspy
crisis87 4 years ago
man... Magnus always have draws in early games :/
sallom899 4 years ago
wow respect fot topalov. great person and player!
petisnnake 4 years ago 6
i didnt say anything about his reputation all or topalov all i said was kasparov is a genius and he is
tzone135 4 years ago 2
Well Topalov still plays more interesting and entertaining chess then Kramnik. Nothing more pathetic then bunch of loosers making stupid remarks about two great players.
blackm0re 4 years ago
you silly goose we it isnt loosers its *losers*
tzone135 3 years ago
no we, it isnt ***im a silly goose too
tzone135 3 years ago
you idiot kasparov is a genius if you dont believe me ask anyone ever to play chess with him
tzone135 4 years ago
topalov is bit of a loser... but not necessarily in this video
b4passion 4 years ago
show off? I think he was very modest in admiting neither him, Anand, Kramnik nor Leko are at the same level of Kasparov.
peboguxX 4 years ago 4
Respect Topalov, his competitions even if he lose against anybody in top10 improves modern chess. He has talked and explained well about Kasparov.
Chag1n 4 years ago 4
wat a showoff
flipsta8 4 years ago
I lost respect for Topalov after his complaints against Kramnik going to bathroom 2 often .He acted like a sore loser.
AntiBullS 4 years ago
Atleast Vaseline showed respect to Gazza. Shame Topa had to result to cheating at the world championship match with Kramnik and the candidates.
glossandcurls 4 years ago
glossandcurls (3 months ago) Show Hide Marked as spam 0 (Reply) (Spam)
Atleast ---Vaseline--- showed respect to Gazza. Shame Topa had to result to cheating at the world championship match with Kramnik and the candidates
----------------------------------
Lmao.. vAseline lol
hellomynameis1234567 4 years ago
I find it humorous that supporters of Topalov, like x33mmm, still say that Kramnik had used fritz 10. You could probably easier find a large horde of gold than prove it, which everyone knows he didn't anyway. You people just have to accept the fact that he tried to play with Kramnik's mind, got a free point, and still lost.
ubernerd35 4 years ago
kasparov best ever Look at the numbers and stats nobody has ever been as good and consistent as him My only regret was that kasparov never faced fischer in the 80's but i still think kasparov would beat him
vjimene 4 years ago 2
Karpov best ever.He factically played Kasparov to a draw in all of their championship matches.Besides,take into consideration that if we compare these two russians,Karpov has done more things in his life than just playing chess-he is the bakalaur of mathematics as well.
gologram 4 years ago
I like Karpov too, but when it comes to Kasparov vs Karpov, one of them was world chess champion for almost two decades, the other for just a few years. Unfortunately the facts speak for themselves on that matter.
calibansfury 4 years ago
Karpov was world champion for 10 years, Kasparov for 15 years. When Kasparov became world champion he was down 5-0, but Karpov lost his nerve and allowed Kasparov to come back and win. Kasparov never dominated Karpov (12 years his senior) and always nudged out victory in the world championship matches.
Geprodis 4 years ago
I appreciate the background, and as I said, I really like Karpov--but my point was just as you stated. Kasparov beat Karpov more than the other way around. One of the beauties of chess is the lack of ambiguity in things like this. When a WC and a contender meet, who's better is found out shortly thereafter.
calibansfury 4 years ago
In their five world championship matches, Karpov has 19 wins, 21 losses, and 104 draws in 144 games.
Ruxistico 2 years ago
yeah and by a strange coincidence it showed that fisher demands of having draws not counted was unrealistic what strange coincidence, what luck that the soviet system had no say in chess...
IHATENEDAH 2 years ago
lol, there is definetly some logic to Fischers demand! Still, the statistics I wrote above concern the strength of Kasparov and Karpov respectively and in comparison. I wrote the comment as a response to calibansfury who seem to underestimate just how close the WC matches between the two russians were.
Of course, if you asked Fisher (before we lost him)... Then all of the K-K games were artificial constructs and the result of a soviet plot against him, the only true genius of chess.
Ruxistico 2 years ago
That would be 16 years for Karpov...
Doublemac88 3 years ago
I used to think Topalov was good until he lost to 16 year old Magnus Carlson a few months ago.
kakashi76767 4 years ago
Topalov will get back in shape and regain his title!
Go Veselin!
racophil 4 years ago
listen veselin topalov is the best chess player in the world not him but kramnik is cheater because he used computer program against topalov called fritz 10 he is bulgarian me too bulgaria is the greatest nation fuc your mums loser suck it
x33mmm 4 years ago
Topalov is a cheater. He used a wireless miniature earpiece and an accomplice to give him the right moves as they were generated by a computer.
goldmarker 4 years ago
Topalov is number one and will be N1
Violetov 4 years ago
@goldmarker
that was kramnik, dude.
you mistake both players.
gringoroko 1 year ago
Whoever makes fun of him, remember his IQ is much higher than yours...respect that!
ItalianWarrior777 4 years ago
This loser is losing his hair,that's why he's
a loser,isn't my joke funny?
KenSix 5 years ago
That man is not so ugly as he apperars on that video, and you see he is a magnificent person. Hes ability on chess is still not fully developed, He will be much better than Kasparov. So, respect that great man pls.
Tazz1287 5 years ago
you've got to admire the guy's humility... I think he's right, but I can't imagine many other sports players being able to say something similar lets say in football (soccer)
kudos to you...
vjanik 5 years ago 2
Shamnik has more to be ashamed of, how can he calim to play a 'World Championship' When aainst Leko it was on a max of 14 games and then Topalov it was 12 games.
armbar 5 years ago
he sounds like a dying rat what a poor loser at least he is good at chess gotta have something to make up for what life has cheated him
robertkarpov 5 years ago
WOW. Topa the winer sorry ass loser speaks in English.
And his voice is so Damn irritating.
KenSix 5 years ago
Dude he's not freaking here to gave an English lesson with your sorry @ss. He's not even American or British, and he's here to talk about Kasparov, so f!ck u.
PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 5 years ago 2
A beautiful mind. Humility and dignity and sportsmanship at its finest.
kanajlo 5 years ago 3
You must be refering to Kramnik.
bodwisa 5 years ago
is it topalov? or is it john tuturro? seperated at birth i say...
pawntorook4 5 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Could you PLEASE remove this video, I beg you. The guy's face looks disgusting here.
bodwisa 5 years ago
He's not here for his friggin' face.
kanajlo 5 years ago
Jesus u are so bad persons... always trying to pull people down because of their appearences... maybe he isnt pretty but his QI might BE AT LEAST 10000000000000x MORE than u.U are anti-human at ur comments. u have no right to come in youtube and speak dirty about people, HES A HUMAN-pretty or not, ur the same has him!
EdGeFaLL 5 years ago
what he and his team are dysplaing in Elista is a disgrace for the chess world.
They are playing so dirty. LEt´s hope for Kramnik strenght in the final match.
cyberfranz 5 years ago
I don't think he has a pathetic voice. But even if he did, that does not detract from his BEAUTIFUL brain and legandery status. This Guy is SO humble and cool and if all men were like him we would be living in Utopia.
PutridNZ 5 years ago