Whenever I watch videos like this, I feel empowered to live in such an age, although sometimes a bit angry that people oppose thinkers such as Dawkins and Nesse. A society run by this sort of thinking would truly be amazing, and it's ourselves that are holding us buck. Selfish, childish religion, and the thinking it entails must be the most damaging force to our future society.
without fearful anxieties we would die multiple times throughout the day. anxiety can be advantageous it has kept us on our toes making us more successful and competitive.
"we think the body was shaped for health - & of course it was not shaped for health it was shaped for maxium reproduction & this explains a lot".
I wonder if this part of natural selection explains why men don't last as long as women in bed. My theory has been that our ancestors wanted to mate as quickly as they could to avoid becoming an easy lunch. For what ever reason i think it's time for NS to realise that men would prefer a diff. trade off. xD
1.06 "the WHO data shows that especially for women of reproductive years in modern countries more than half of all the medical disability and early death is from mental problems mainly depression and anxiety disorders" amazing interview, thanks for posting
If the religious viewpoint was never the dominant one, and people asked these evolutionary questions a long time ago, we would probably have some genetic procedure that would allow us to live to 300 by now. A very insightful interview, thanks for posting.
That's the problem with anxiety in modern humans, it's developed from being a useful instinct in primordial man to something which now often manifests via neuroses in social contexts for example as opposed to being a sole survival instinct like to give a modern example when driving a car where there are oncoming vehicles on the other side of the road for instance
so in theory would it be posibble to create a superior being( living longer and immune to most disases) by using a longer gestation period as the trade off or high cost?
...If people start reproducing later in life, then genes which allow people to live longer will be passed on? Say like people reproducing on average when they are 40 and then shifted to...I guess it's limited by meno-pause...
Menopause isn't necessarily an obstacle. if everyone only started reproducing at 40, then those who got menopause later than others would have more offspring, raising the frequency of late-menopause genes in the gene pool. Then raise the reproduction age to 45, repeat, then raise it to 50, repeat, and so on and so forth. This pushes the menopause age back and back while passing on the genes for living longer and longer. In theory, you could extend the average life-expectancy indefinitely.
@xRobelax Simple accidents make that unlikely. That and younger people are much more likely to make babies accidentally that people in their 30s or 40s, thus a large majority of babies are concieved in the teens or twenties.
wow! this portion of the interview makes me wonder how much more psychiatrists could improve if they do what doctor Nesse has and incorporate evolution into psychology.
Are there any psych majors out there that can attest to the amount of information used from evolutionary theory in psychiatrics?
Did Randolf really mean to suggest you can't have a car that does 1000 kilometres to a tank? My car does, at least when driven gently. And it is an OLD car. It is a Peugeot 405 Estate Deisal... nothing hi-tec.
Yeah yeah, I did get the trade-offs point point. I was just surprised at the nature of the error... you know, MATHS.. when these guys are so very detirmined to be strictly scientific.... (just a little ironic, I'm thinking)
The idea I get is that if conceptualisations are to be supported by facts, you gotta make sure your facts are REAL!
Meaning....
If Nesse thought fuel consumption was worth mentioning as an example, I'm certainly justified in pointing out it isn't an accurate example in wider terms than those bounded by narrow "American" perceptions.
Or, put another way, part of the world's problems are caused by Americans not wishing to drive modest diesel motor cars that yield 1000km to the tankful.
just add another stinkin 0 to the 1000, i think he just made the mistake in talking. His point is still valid, you can't have improvement/perfection without high cost!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Randolph Ness is a doctor [MD] and should be very aware of how misplacing decimal points is one of the commonest causes of accidental drug overdose ... for this reason his error is not just "another stinkin' zero" as you put it.
Until the evidence suggests otherwise, it's best to stick with the best explanation we have and then move on :) It's not a big deal. It's not like these guys need to distort their perception of reality to match particular theory or, say, book.
Doctors should begin by asking their patients whether they were designed by god or natural selection. If they say they evolved, then begin discussing evolutionary medicine with them and proceed in the usual way.
Otherwise the doctor should put away their medical equipment and begin mixing clay to match the patient's skin color until asked what they're doing by the patient. At which point they should explain that they're using the medical procedure described in Genesis.
We all, (Americans especially) need to realise something. Pain is the body's way of telling you something's wrong. Taking a painkiller will stop you feeling the pain, but it puts nothing right. You need to stop sitting awkwardly, or eat less to avoid indigestion etc. Taking a drug co.'s latest "cure" does little more (try actually listening to their ads) than relieve a symptom. Got a URI? You NEED to cough. Overweight? A pill won't help much, but exercise and a change of diet will. etc
Listen there are plenty of religious freak sites about. Instead of wasting your time & everybody else's, why don't you go and commune with your fellow zealots and leave this adult thread to adults?
"some of it makes sense, some of it doesn't, and some is just plain lunacy"
This is the way with all of science. a lot of science and maths goes against what we consider "common sense". This doesnt mean its more or less wrong, it means that common sense is not the useful tool you think it is.
instead of designed, FORMED.
deathorb 5 months ago
omg no good at maths but always have loved it, i think its the key to everything!
ThePhil909 5 months ago
Very suprised that they have not talked about Epi-Genetic Principle O_O
DementedScrew 6 months ago
I wish I was this skeleton, so that I would have listened to this interview.
hinatah89 9 months ago
Who was the underbite guy in the middle?
derman077 9 months ago 3
Im not gay, but Im sexually attracted to this guys brain!
Imphipis 10 months ago 3
All my doctor does is give me pills i dont know what symptoms his patients have but mine are pretty nasty
Mider999 11 months ago
Didnt they answered the question.. Whats the meaning of life? Reproduction
kotkee 1 year ago
God does exist, his name is Randolph Nesse. Damn interesting stuff.
BlckSbthMan 1 year ago
@BlckSbthMan No, that is a man, you vile, disgusting piece of shit - the true God is the God of scripture, you stupid motherfucker.
FunnyLittleChap 5 months ago
@FunnyLittleChap Do you talk to yourself in prayer with that mouth?
BlckSbthMan 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BlckSbthMan fuck yourself, you stupid asshole.
FunnyLittleChap 5 months ago
@FunnyLittleChap
STFU preaching knucklehead
sonykroket 2 months ago
I could listen to this Randolph guy all day :D
EedDeryi 1 year ago
lol "walking dustbin" I love Dawkins.
insainbassist 1 year ago
Whenever I watch videos like this, I feel empowered to live in such an age, although sometimes a bit angry that people oppose thinkers such as Dawkins and Nesse. A society run by this sort of thinking would truly be amazing, and it's ourselves that are holding us buck. Selfish, childish religion, and the thinking it entails must be the most damaging force to our future society.
TheBiddleMan 1 year ago
without fearful anxieties we would die multiple times throughout the day. anxiety can be advantageous it has kept us on our toes making us more successful and competitive.
nonphixional1 1 year ago
This is a very interesting conversation, I love the part about why humans have anxiety it does make you see it in a very different way.
jjvphilosopher 1 year ago 5
"we think the body was shaped for health - & of course it was not shaped for health it was shaped for maxium reproduction & this explains a lot".
I wonder if this part of natural selection explains why men don't last as long as women in bed. My theory has been that our ancestors wanted to mate as quickly as they could to avoid becoming an easy lunch. For what ever reason i think it's time for NS to realise that men would prefer a diff. trade off. xD
P.s. I love they way the vids end - 8:57 lol
Uberboy07 1 year ago
1.06 "the WHO data shows that especially for women of reproductive years in modern countries more than half of all the medical disability and early death is from mental problems mainly depression and anxiety disorders" amazing interview, thanks for posting
streetfightsecrets 1 year ago
This interview is just fantastic. Love it!
nmatters 1 year ago
This is a really really great interview :)
Houdinitreehouse 1 year ago 4
If the religious viewpoint was never the dominant one, and people asked these evolutionary questions a long time ago, we would probably have some genetic procedure that would allow us to live to 300 by now. A very insightful interview, thanks for posting.
sfmike20 1 year ago 3
How many of your grandparents died before reproducing? :) This is so brilliant.
TudiRad 1 year ago
I <3 the Heart
sewpr512 1 year ago
That's the problem with anxiety in modern humans, it's developed from being a useful instinct in primordial man to something which now often manifests via neuroses in social contexts for example as opposed to being a sole survival instinct like to give a modern example when driving a car where there are oncoming vehicles on the other side of the road for instance
adamscott 1 year ago
I must send this video to creationists to see what they will think.
bouiglob 1 year ago
GENIOUS!
lalomania1 1 year ago 4
This is so great! Thanks!
planetar4564 2 years ago
Fantastic. Thanks so much for posting this. One of the most interesting things I've ever listened to.
ryko26 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so in theory would it be posibble to create a superior being( living longer and immune to most disases) by using a longer gestation period as the trade off or high cost?
GrimSpeecher 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Dawkins is a square.
TheRegulator81 2 years ago
Yes because it's really important to be cool when you are a Evolutionary biologist :P
TheEVILutionist 2 years ago 6
The difference between Tommy Lee Jones and Will Smith is Will Smith makes it look good.
TheRegulator81 2 years ago
i have suffered with panic attacks for years. this is one of the most helpfull and interesting things i have ever seen. thanks for posting! x
mowgli123456789 2 years ago 11
Comment removed
LastOneStandingStill 2 years ago
...If people start reproducing later in life, then genes which allow people to live longer will be passed on? Say like people reproducing on average when they are 40 and then shifted to...I guess it's limited by meno-pause...
xRobelax 2 years ago
Menopause isn't necessarily an obstacle. if everyone only started reproducing at 40, then those who got menopause later than others would have more offspring, raising the frequency of late-menopause genes in the gene pool. Then raise the reproduction age to 45, repeat, then raise it to 50, repeat, and so on and so forth. This pushes the menopause age back and back while passing on the genes for living longer and longer. In theory, you could extend the average life-expectancy indefinitely.
sam51092 2 years ago
@xRobelax Simple accidents make that unlikely. That and younger people are much more likely to make babies accidentally that people in their 30s or 40s, thus a large majority of babies are concieved in the teens or twenties.
PDelta41 1 year ago
enlightning
sulthus 2 years ago 2
wow! this portion of the interview makes me wonder how much more psychiatrists could improve if they do what doctor Nesse has and incorporate evolution into psychology.
Are there any psych majors out there that can attest to the amount of information used from evolutionary theory in psychiatrics?
Shigren 2 years ago 5
Fuckin awesome interview
krzw92 2 years ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
Males eat fried chicken, females prepare fried chicken....who's gonna die first dodo!
presidentOrangutan 2 years ago
The Chicken.
And by the way, have you noticed there are more Male chefs than Female?
thadeusmac 2 years ago 11
one word (probably mispelt)
EUGENICS!!!!!!!!! wooop! lol
martybow1 2 years ago
dumb ass
jtoddguelph 2 years ago
I am no such thing
martybow1 2 years ago
Did Randolf really mean to suggest you can't have a car that does 1000 kilometres to a tank? My car does, at least when driven gently. And it is an OLD car. It is a Peugeot 405 Estate Deisal... nothing hi-tec.
effyleven 2 years ago
Hehe good for you but that was actually just a metaphor explaining trade offs^^
Eternaldream00 2 years ago 2
Yeah yeah, I did get the trade-offs point point. I was just surprised at the nature of the error... you know, MATHS.. when these guys are so very detirmined to be strictly scientific.... (just a little ironic, I'm thinking)
effyleven 2 years ago
Americans dont drive Diesel Peugeots . Anyway , dont be so pedantic . It was a passing comment . You got the idea
monkeybudge 2 years ago
The idea I get is that if conceptualisations are to be supported by facts, you gotta make sure your facts are REAL!
Meaning....
If Nesse thought fuel consumption was worth mentioning as an example, I'm certainly justified in pointing out it isn't an accurate example in wider terms than those bounded by narrow "American" perceptions.
Or, put another way, part of the world's problems are caused by Americans not wishing to drive modest diesel motor cars that yield 1000km to the tankful.
effyleven 2 years ago
just add another stinkin 0 to the 1000, i think he just made the mistake in talking. His point is still valid, you can't have improvement/perfection without high cost!
acceptanceisbliss 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Randolph Ness is a doctor [MD] and should be very aware of how misplacing decimal points is one of the commonest causes of accidental drug overdose ... for this reason his error is not just "another stinkin' zero" as you put it.
effyleven 2 years ago
Until the evidence suggests otherwise, it's best to stick with the best explanation we have and then move on :) It's not a big deal. It's not like these guys need to distort their perception of reality to match particular theory or, say, book.
baze128 2 years ago 3
So what is your alternative?
ulegee 2 years ago 3
Doctors should begin by asking their patients whether they were designed by god or natural selection. If they say they evolved, then begin discussing evolutionary medicine with them and proceed in the usual way.
Otherwise the doctor should put away their medical equipment and begin mixing clay to match the patient's skin color until asked what they're doing by the patient. At which point they should explain that they're using the medical procedure described in Genesis.
ananiasacts 2 years ago 106
@ananiasacts Just perfect :)
Cougar139tweak 1 year ago
@ananiasacts do not misrepresent the bible, you disgustingly vile cunt.
FunnyLittleChap 5 months ago
Mr. Nesse is a very very intelligent and kind person.
Quinzio 2 years ago 67
what is a chinman?a christian concept?
lancedboyle 2 years ago
It's a skeleton with a hilariously large example of a chin..
An ancestor of Jay Leno.. :D
IloveJesusYesId0 2 years ago 4
I'm getting a "We're sorry, this video is no longer available" message. Yes, I tried refreshing.
InfiniteAnvil 3 years ago
Aaand though I tried for five minutes, it worked the very next time. Nvm.
InfiniteAnvil 3 years ago
This guy Nesse is brilliant, the type of guy who'd be your favourite lecturer I think. Absolutely fascinating interview.
holydave 3 years ago 12
AMEN!!! Wooop
martybow1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The skeleton is Chinman
IloveJesusYesId0 3 years ago
Who is there third one between them? Is it Charles Darwin?
vfursov 3 years ago
We all, (Americans especially) need to realise something. Pain is the body's way of telling you something's wrong. Taking a painkiller will stop you feeling the pain, but it puts nothing right. You need to stop sitting awkwardly, or eat less to avoid indigestion etc. Taking a drug co.'s latest "cure" does little more (try actually listening to their ads) than relieve a symptom. Got a URI? You NEED to cough. Overweight? A pill won't help much, but exercise and a change of diet will. etc
KeybdFlyer 3 years ago 3
YOu know what pisses me off rich people are gonna end up living forever one day and poor people are gonna get f*cked probably..
IloveJesusYesId0 3 years ago
are you allowed to say those words from your Jesus?
rubenkistemaker 2 years ago
I just love Jesus, he isn't mine.. If he exists...
IloveJesusYesId0 2 years ago
And that's the good part of god's plan.
ananiasacts 2 years ago
Greatness!
blackcrazydog 3 years ago
Like the Galopagos Tortoise's shell. Nothing random about that mutation.
phelius 3 years ago
Alll mutations are random...
martybow1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
very.... very interesting!
dhwgrooves 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
evolutionary biology is great. you can just make up reasons for why things and be confident that no one will prove you wrong,
nosson77 3 years ago
You don't understand science.
InReasonWeTrust 3 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
evolution is not a hard science
some of it makes sense, some of it doesn't, and some is just plain lunacy,
that's why the best scientists don't bother with it,
like the best doctors, mathematicians, physicists, professionals in information theory etc. just don't take it seriously
nosson77 3 years ago
creationism is not a hard science
none of it makes sense, most of it doesn't, and most is just plain lunacy,
that's why the best scientists don't bother with it,
like the best doctors, mathematicians, physicists, professionals in information theory etc. just don't take it seriously
phelius 3 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
if bible creationism is a nice ferry tale
then evolution from random mutations is a horror movie
and i think that is a good description for both of them
nosson77 3 years ago
That horror movie is the reality we live. That's a terrible outlook on life though. Some mutations are random, most are not.
phelius 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"most are not"
what do you mean most mutaions are not random. you dont beleive random mutations are the cause for most new genetic code?
nosson77 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Like the galopagos Tortoise's shell. Nothing random about that mutation.
phelius 3 years ago
@phelius - ALL mutations are random, guided by an nonrandom process known as natural selection.
NoSz4 3 years ago 4
"then evolution from random mutations is a horror movie"
Things are not more or less true because you find them more or less pleasant.
irishmauddib 3 years ago 2
You mean "fairy" tale. A "ferry" tale would be about a boat.
SpanishForkOutcast 3 years ago
False, evolution IS hard science.
TDarkHunt 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"Evolution" is not even a properly defined term (among evolutionist) never mind a science
nosson77 3 years ago
nosson77
Listen there are plenty of religious freak sites about. Instead of wasting your time & everybody else's, why don't you go and commune with your fellow zealots and leave this adult thread to adults?
clearvision12 3 years ago 9
Thanks for the nosense77 smackdown - it's a vile job but somebody has to do it.
fctchk 3 years ago
fctchk
Ha! Ha! Peace kiddo!
clearvision12 3 years ago
"some of it makes sense, some of it doesn't, and some is just plain lunacy"
This is the way with all of science. a lot of science and maths goes against what we consider "common sense". This doesnt mean its more or less wrong, it means that common sense is not the useful tool you think it is.
irishmauddib 3 years ago 5
"that's why the best scientists don't bother with it"
Names evidence and citations please.
irishmauddib 3 years ago 2
I think this is my favorite of these series of videos of Dawkins' interviews.
vysehrad 3 years ago
Very empowering stuff!
DrMikero 3 years ago 3
Nice video! I like these kinds of videos. They're actually good and solid videos that desrve a spot on youtube. haha!
chick5581 3 years ago 2
Thank god for Atheism : )
tricke101 3 years ago 2
Two very eloquent individuals discussing a fascinating topic. YouTube doesn't get any better than this.
scorchiooo 3 years ago 5
Thank god, sorry forget the last bit force of habit!
thanks to Darwin, Dr Dawkins and Dr Nasse for sharing their wonderful wisdom with the rest of us. I take my hat off to you gentlemen. Bravo!!
Megoolies 3 years ago
I did learn alot thanks!
infiniteusername 3 years ago
This is great! Thanks :)
TheCounterweight1 3 years ago 2
this is beyond brilliant. hands up who's gonna buy this guy's book!
spotlitkiss 3 years ago 3
*Raises hand*
AWAKENxEXMORTIS 3 years ago
It's amazing how simple and straightforward these things are when explained and still I wouldn't have gotten them in a 100 years.
boneimre 3 years ago 2
Knocking out a bunch of ageing genes would cause a proliferation of tumours throughout ones body I suspect.
Mjhavok 3 years ago 4
This interview series is just phenomenally interesting. From Derren Brown to Randolph Nesse. Next please!
Clausfarre 3 years ago 6
One of the most interesting interviews so far. Thanks for posting!
Ateapotist 3 years ago 5
great stuff
hundingwelser 3 years ago
stunning
waheex 3 years ago 5