High probability of life on other planets? Here is the evidence that supports this theory. The 5 elements that are the most abundant in the universe - Hydrogen, Helium, Oxygen, Carbon and Nitrogen. What is most of the life comprised of on this planet? Hydrogen, Oxygen, Carbon and Nitrogen.
how could you not believe in other life when there are more stars than grains of sand on all the beaches in the world most with multiple planets around each. frustrating to watch these videos sometimes.
I think Pat Kenny, (the host) actually gave a good show of himself here. Prof. Dawkins was, as usual brilliant, intelligent and as always a true educator. (The religious nut with the 'tache needs to just get real).
jesus effin christ....how does Richard Dawkins keep his cool around these fuckwits....i won't blame him if one day during a "debate" he just snaps and starts choking the shit out one of these religitards
I am sad that Richard Dawkins is turning 71 this year, I hope he lives longer because obviously, only someone like him can fight this war against religion. together with Michael Newdow, Dan Barker and some of the other guys, much respect..
people that feel the need to tell the play-by-play of their lives when asking a question tend to not really have much of a question to begin with...they just wanted to have an excuse to vent in public, as do most of the fearful types that have to cling to some form of spaghetti monster for any hope. religious people just refuse to admit that they are escapists at heart looking for some amazing supernatural force to save the day and walk off into the sunset with them
@ Botjer1 -No, he said there could be aliens who would be so far advanced they would seem like gods. "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" -Arthur C Clark
To the semi-bald questioner with glasses; all holy books teach exclusive access to the one true god and intolerance. They all say kill the infidels, do not suffer a witch to live, homosexuality is an abomination, and s on...
It's not Dawkin's "chosen criteria" but the scientific method!
It is ilogical to think that life cant exist else where in the universe as we can use the fact that we exisit as evidence that life CAN happen. Once we accept that life can happen, because it HAS happend here, then, its illogical to conclude it cant happen anywhere else. It would require far more evidence to prove we are the only ones in the universe, then to assume theres most likley other life forms in space. Therefore, by that standerd, the onus is on those claiming we are alone, to prove it.
"You cant imagine inheriting the genes from someone who wants to die, because they are dead." ......Ummmm......What??? What in the hell is that supposed to mean? What a lousy reasonless rebuttal to the question. I dont see how anyone can take Dawkins seriously.
@studlypear05, learn to read, learn to think, then read one of his many excellent books. His intellect is impressive, but only if you have the intelligence to understand what he's talking about.
@timchilli it takes intelligence to recognize intelligence and you obviously are dearly lacking given the fact that you follow Dawkins nonsensical Horse manure. I feel sorry for you. Try reading more than one book besides Dawkins.
@studlypear05 Yes, I'm unintelligent, because I trust in evolution and obserable science. Whereas you're intelligent because you send thought-messages to an invisible man in the sky, and you were instructed to do this by a book written by sheep-herders from the Iron Age.
@timchilli Your statement of "thought-messages to an invisible man in the sky" just shows your ignorance of the Bible and the relationship between God and man. You are sadly mis-informed by religion and idiotic religious traditions. Again, you are trying to deal with me as if I was an ignorant religious slave to some church. I dont believe in religion or church. I believe in God and his personal relationship with me. I dont go to church, never have and never will.
"Alien civilizations on some other distant planet that are super human" HAHAHAHAHAHA "What's your evidence for that Dawkins?" Wow! Dawkins discounts the Bible and heaps of evidence of the existance of God yet he throws some cooky claim in his book about the existance of aliens with no evidence whatsoever. Wow! I cant believe anyone would give Dawkins the time of day. I feel sorry for Atheists who follow Dawkins. He's leading you no where blindly.
@timchilli ?????.......i beg to differ. Both religious people and atheists are repetitive and empty. Most atheists have been hurt in one way or another by a religious group or ignorant religious people and then throw the baby out with the bath water by throwing God out with some religious nut who pissed them off or hurt their feelings. I enjoy God but I hate religion. Religion was made by men and is manipulated daily by men. I hate how many atheists have never sought out God for who He truely is
@studlypear05, as a rationalist, I have reasoned that there is no god. I have studied the bible from an early age, and have undertaking comparative religious studies. Nothing I have read or heard or experienced has made me think anything other than THERE IS NO GOD.
@timchilli I was taught the Bible from an early age, didn't care for it much until I became born again of God's spirit, then I actually understood God, life and God's word. God and His word are spiritual and it takes spirit to understand it or else it makes no sense at all. I tested God out for myself, moved out from home at 18 without a dime to my name. I applied principles from God's Word and saw miracles, healings and God following through on His promises. We should talk, maybe I can help you
@studlypear05 So you admit to being indoctrinated before you could think rationally for yourself. Good. We're making progress. Next I'd like you to admit that if you'd been born in Saudi Arabia you'd be a muslim who regards christianity as a false religion and islam as the final religion.
@timchilli What? Haha. Where is your reasoing going? lets talk christianity and not go off on an irrelevant tangent. Yes I was indoctrinated as a child but so what? so where you. You admitted it. Once I could think rationally, i stepped away from christianity and moved away from home and everything I ever knew. I dabbled and researched Atheism, philosophy and everything in between. I entertained Christianity again with ration, reason and perspective. I found...God is real!!!
@studlypear05 So you dabbled in empirical, falsifiable science and then reverted to religion? That, my friend, smacks of laziness. You WANT to believe, which is different from it ACTUALLY being so. I'm sad that you chose a path of willful ignorance, but that's your "cross to bear" as they say.
@timchilli Sooo your calling your own belief in atheism "falsifiable science"? I just told you that i took the time to see life from your persepctive and understand the the reasons why you believe what you believe and you call me lazy. Wow! Your contradicting yourself my friend because you said you did the same in studying the bible/religion after indoctrination as a child and deicided to choose atheism just as I chose to choose God. How is your choice right and mine wrong?
@timchilli You WANT to believe that "God does not exist", which is different from it ACTUALLY being so. If I chose a path of ignorance, you chose a path of ignorance just the same. that's your....cross to share??? haha.
@timchilli I'm talking about receiving "spiritual life" when I say born again. Didn't you ever come across that concept when you studied the bible? 1 corinthians 2:14 tells us that we have to have spirit to understand God, it says "but the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned". If you don't have spirit its no wonder at all that God and His Word are foolishness to you.
@timchilli You still have not answered my question. in fact you are avoiding an honest and valid point that i decided to illuminate with a scripture verse. Why are you avoiding my question? You are trying to detract the progression of yours and my debate here simply because its not going in your favor. My purpose is not to throw facts back and forth for the sake of defending God. Im simply trying to show you something i see to be essential to understanding God that it seems you have never known
@timchilli The purpose of me quoting that scripture verse was to simply to give reference to my question for you. I want to know if you have ever explored the idea that God is spirit and that it might require us having spirit in order to understand/experience/recognize God? So, what do you think?
@studlypear05, to answer your question: no, I haven't, because "spirit" and all religious language is vague and meaningless. I explore science because it is empirical and can be tested objectively. I have no interest in fairy tales.
Now, answer my question about scripture verses below. Explain the verses I quoted.
@timchilli Thanks for answering my question. Why are you so quick to dismiss the idea of God being spiritual? Have you tested it out for yourself and found a lack of evidence or evidence disproving its validity? Simply stating your opinion that all religious language is meaningless is not good enough and is just as foolish as the religious people who command belief in God because a book tells you to. Have you honestly looked into the topic of God being a spirit yourself?
@studlypear05, as I said, I'm not interested in testing the untestable. I may as well spend my time trying to disprove that there's an invisible teapot orbiting Mars. There is simply no point. Any conclusion I reach would be subjective and therefore invalid to objective, falsifiable observation.
Now, can you please explain the scriptures I quoted.
@timchilli Whoa! but it is testable. You have been mis-informed. I thought you said you read the Bible? The way to test and prove that God exists and that He is Spirit is by "SPEAKING IN TONGUES" plain and simple. Acts 2:4 "they were all filled with Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues". Verse 8 "and how we hear every man in our own tongue". Verse 11 "we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God"
@timchilli I speak in tongues. I do it everyday. I have personally seen friends of mine speak in tongues and someone from a foreign country understand them because they were speaking there language from their country. My question to you is why dont you speak in tongues?
@timchilli To answer your question about the verses you quoted from the old testament, first you gotta understand that all those commandments from the law were not God's desire. It was the people that wanted all those laws. The children of Israel wanted a king and a law like all the other nations at the time had. God cant control what people do, it was their decision to live under those laws. Jesus did not come to enforce those laws, he came to "FULFILL" those laws meaning accomplish them.
@studlypear05, what empty rhetoric you speak. You're truly an asset to christianity.
The bible is revered by the faithful as being the inspired word of god. The verses in it are inspired by god and therefore endorsed by him. What about god commanding the rape and murder of men, women and children of the Amalekites? How can you praise such a murderous, abominable deity that would order the destruction of men, women and children?
@timchilli Jesus came to save mankind from the impossible task of "FULFILLING" the law, that was the whole point of his sacrafice, to save man from their own stupidity and the trouble they got themselves into because they chose to make their own laws and not follow God. I will quote a verse simply to show you that I am not making up what I am saying. Romans 10:4 says "For Christ is the end of the law".
@timchilli How do I lose credibility? Every verse I have addressed is relevant to our conversation. I'm sorry that it contradicts your personal opinions and views which are backed by nothing but your "rational observations". If your so adament that the Bible is a bunch of bull, why dont you have the balls to actually test it out? YOU LOSE CREDIBILITY everytime you hide from the logic that i present to you. You are being a coward. If you dont test it out, your a pussy!
@timchilli Everytime you refer to your atheists ideals that stem from your buddy Dawkins i will quote Dawkins....."Aliens exist". Two can play at this game. Dont be so cheap.
Wow!!! There was no profit to this whole show. There was no further discovery or enlightenment in either direction toward atheism or theism. This was nothing but back and forth bickering. Atheism is better!.......No, religion is better! No, shut up... your stupid because you believe in a God.....lets move on to the next question, no you believe in God too, not valid....next question. The host quickly dismissed any one arguing with reason. This was sad to watch, shame on the host for being biased
A lot of these arguments made during this show were kinda stupid compared to the arguments dawkins typically is faced with. Kinda sad that 2-3 people basically asked the same question with different wording.
I really, really hope this audience is not genuinely representative of 21st Century Ireland. Sometimes the hardcore god squad hear about these debates and flood the place, so I hope for the sake of rational Irish people that this was the case, and that these aggressive nonsensical dogmatists are not the majority voice.
@kooperman I think he walks around everywhere thinking all hope is lost about life in general. He has clearly shut out God from his life. Remmember, "God is Spirit"... "those that worship God must worship in spirit". How does one get spirit? Ya gotta get born again!!! How do people expect to understand the spiritual world and God by using their carnal physical mind and understanding. I dont understand how the brilliant Dawkins misses this fundamental principal. I guess he never read the bible.
Why do audience members in this format ALWAYS have to think that anyone gives a shit about them and ramble about their own lives? Ask a question and then shut up!
@iordaniames It's symptomatic of their favouring of personal anecdote and subjective desirability over considering the big picture and attempting to approach something like objectivity. Maybe they do so because smart people are usually too polite to argue further when people get emotional and generalise from personal experience, which in turn gives them the idea that bringing in their life's story adds to the force of their arguments.
"i read his book, on a beach in greece". i don't understand people feeling the need to add stupid points like that. if you read it on a couch in your basement it would be the same. idiot
hahahahaha "dawkin can you give me one example of mutation that is cause the increase in genetic complexity" Eso es lo que no comprenden muchos ateitos, es ahi en esas cosas que la ciencia no puede explicar donde Dios se convierte en la explicacion!!
I don't understand why theists keep jumping on Dawkins's alien remark. He is NOT claiming like it's a fact! It's just a guess! Meanwhile, you theists are the ones claiming God exists for a fact. If you want to claim it as a guess, then ok, my respect for you will go up. But that's not what you guys are doing. You are claiming your God as a fact, meanwhile Richard was merely throwing it out as a guess. Fact vs guess...get it? Jeez....
@Casshyr A man that was raised from the dead after three days... how do you explain that if he wasn't the son of God? It was even prophesied many times hundreds of years before Jesus was even alive that God would raise him from the dead.
@studlypear05 yea, but Christianity isn't the only religion that speaks of resurrection, or even a prophesied resurrection. Plenty of other religions have the same thing too, and some are even older than Christianity. How can you say they are wrong?
2:40 => this guy's logic is basically like "if you are a Christian who rejects all other religions, you are ok. But if you are an atheist, that makes you a fundamentalist!"
@N1nja32 - in case you don't know, bibles are given freely most of the times .. you can ask a free copy from your nearest church. Unlike fake atheists who use a strawman god topic on their books and enrich themselves because many crusaders against god buy them.
@ikawpipa As true as that may be, I am pretty sure there is a much higher percentage of people that read the bible. With that in mind I correct myself...
"and the bible is read by people 10x more gullible".
@ikawpipa He said it is more probable because IT IS more probable. Seriously, just think about it. Over the years science has proven that life on earth cannot live without water, and the evidence is highly on the side that says we evolved. Exactly like what Dawkins said, there are BILLIONS of planets out there.... which means is it VERY PROBABLE one of those planets has water like EARTH, which can sustain life to evolve. I am not even goign to respond to, "your god Dawkins". Just foolish.
@N1nja32 - i understand, but that is not science... until Dawkins prove that there's life out there, it will remain a fairytale and imagination, you are free to have faith and belief in dawkins but that is not science.
@ikawpipa First of all I was not saying it was science, I was saying that there is science that supports the idea of aliens. And secondly, what difference does it make? This idea is more probable to be true and not delusional, than everything Dawkins claims that is delusional about God and religion. This is because at least we have evidence that it CAN be true meaning we believe we are less delusional than religious people. What evidence do religious people have that show they aren't delusional?
@N1nja32 - First of all, Dawkins is not talking about the God of the bible in his book... and that for sure is a delusion. Secondly, what about the near death experiences of atheists (Howard Storm) and others? .. almost all, if not all who experienced near death experience that there is a Supernatural being.... no one has said there's just spontaneous random chemical reactions and evolution happening there.
@ikawpipa Arguing with you is pointless. First of all where is the proof that it actually was something supernatural? Not something one hallucinated due to fear. If you believe every story you hear you are way too gullible my friend. Try to think rationally without bias. And how do you know no one has said it was spontaneous random chemical reactions? And in the end, what would be more likely?
I understand what Richard means with the word "Very probable", the number of galaxies+the number of stars+the number of planets gives an untold large probability for life, so much, we can speculate that life could be so bizarre our imagination could never grasp it or understand it.
The religious mind is like an unbreakable shell, no one from the outside can break it, only he or her who is inside is the only one who can break free and accept the reality outside that safe haven.
People were in the 21st century, grow a brain!!!! these religious people gave a weak reply, Science is open to the idea of the term god? which god will that be, allah,horus,jesus,krishna,zeus,thor,wotan,yaweh, or my personal favorite the flying spaghetti monster, who knows, but when you find out, give us call, and make sure your not on psychedelics,or easily prone to hallucination. cuz science is to busy improving your life with technology& education & helping you use your brain, k thanx.
This 'debate' illustrates just how much Catholic 'theology' has fucked the Irish mentality generation after generation just like the Hill-Billy religion has screwed up the Southern States of America;listen to how peasant like the audience mentality is!!! They're still thinking in terms of Leprechans under the bed lol.
Phew,,, poor Richard having to rebut so much prejudice against not believing ideas based on... what? 2000+ year old hearsay -in the 21st century! When will humanity finally grow up?
An Irish atheist I feel so ashamed watching this crowd and Dawkin's debate opponent. Ignoring fact and reasoned argument in lieu of a good strong soundbite, one that's actual message is irrelevant once it has been shown to support the pro-god side of the debate.
How could one, dispite there beliefs not have respect for Richard Dawkins. These creationists were ignorant to the point Richard wanted to pull his hair out. He remains calm even when out numbered by stupid people.
William Craig knows that even if he completely loses his ass debating Richard, the stupid and ignorant far outway the open minded people with a little common sense. So.....Craig wins even when he loses (which is every time he debates an atheist).
@shanehand91 its very magnanimous of you to apologise for the catholic churches stultification of many of the inhabitants of your particular piece of rock, but they do it wherever they go and its neither your fault there or at home
@shanehand91 I am not from Ireland but those in the video had their heads on straight and asked and presented honest questions which Dawkins or the host never cared to address.Any time someone from the audience persisted with a valid argument that Dawkins could not rebuttal the host would cut off the exchange and move to the next question. Very biased toward atheism if you ask me. Dawkins and the host showed to be close minded. You should be proud of your fellow countrymen, I am.
@studlypear05 i understand your argument but i was referring to the fact that they didn't try and embrace his thought pattern they kept to the same arguments which Dawkins answered as the audience couldnt see what he was saying they kept asking. I assure you if you had some people asking you the same question many times you too would get frustrated. On another note i am very proud of my country and i would die for my country (if we weren't such a peaceful nation).
My main issue with my countrymen and women is the way the catholic church has affected everyone's self thought i.e they dont have any. I understand that people believe in religion and it is a sense of hope etc. but it has changed this country immeasurable.
richard should punch that tit in the face, theres a difference in speculating in life on other planets by saying its most likely rather than there is.
saying their most likely is life on other planets is looking at our civilisation and saying there are other planets like ours therefor its probable that theres life on other planets.
there is no evidence of god apart from a man written book, a book is not the same level of evidence as planets that are in a habital zone to another star.
@MrGeorge138 its almost shameful that people still think this way. i mean wow. we havnt made one step forawrd at all, and whats worse is that we havnt tried
A populist pulp program like the Late Late Show is not a yard stick for intelligent potential of the Irish. Pat Kenny's mission statement contains little concern for meaningful debate on issues like this. That kind of debate takes places outside the realms of RTE.
Non-believing Irish people are plentiful and, in my periphery, seem not to regret it.
@nguyenimproved You're a very generous person. I should try to better myself by your example. I can only give that guy, 0.01 step above Downs. That makes me a lesser person than yourself, by two orders of magnitude. I guess I'm stuck with me, but I loved and thumbed up your post. Thanks :-)
Dawkins' s arguments are primary against religion. Because the question of being " somethin" instead of "nothing" is over any religion , ..maybe he is closer to the idea of god.
It's tragic that a large proportion of the population believe that their feelings have a deeper meaning which they claim, without any supporting evidence, supports the existence of deity.
Everything Dawkins says here is straight-forward, inarguable, irrefutable, logical and ... almost obvious! Why can't the audience get their retarded heads around these simple ideas? They are as dumb as dog shit.
I think belief is an important thing, whether its believing in God or whoever...however when it becomes an organised reliegion then it becomes dangerous, as we've seen here with the catholic church it is too open for abuse, in this instance people start listening,and following, the beliefs of other humans who claim they represent a god. Think this is a distinction which needs to be made
High probability of life on other planets? Here is the evidence that supports this theory. The 5 elements that are the most abundant in the universe - Hydrogen, Helium, Oxygen, Carbon and Nitrogen. What is most of the life comprised of on this planet? Hydrogen, Oxygen, Carbon and Nitrogen.
craeyon 2 hours ago
many against one!
tusi1390 1 day ago
how could you not believe in other life when there are more stars than grains of sand on all the beaches in the world most with multiple planets around each. frustrating to watch these videos sometimes.
jt2145 1 day ago
"Oh common!" I was feeling the excact same thing..
jalokin123321 1 day ago
richard.. how could you survive with these stupid people o_O
psnflak88 4 days ago 7
Richard is soo patient with dumb people...
seydsaba 5 days ago 2
I think Pat Kenny, (the host) actually gave a good show of himself here. Prof. Dawkins was, as usual brilliant, intelligent and as always a true educator. (The religious nut with the 'tache needs to just get real).
101truthhurts 6 days ago
Let's wrap this up shall we: There is no God.
Oh and when did Dawkins ever say "Aleins exist", typical theist making up story's again...
Skylines01 6 days ago
The audience thinks that because life is hard believing in god is justified.So stupid
28Lyss 6 days ago
why are you trashing the audience, if they had been different they would be on the actual stage and not part of the audience.
shabyyy 1 week ago
the audience is embarrassing. is that seriously the best they could do?
greenandred123 1 week ago 9
seriously don't know how prof. dawkins keeps a straight face.
greenandred123 1 week ago
picking on one sentence in a book is hardly fair...
felipealvarez1982 1 week ago
seriously this audience is very retarded
drasteek 1 week ago
5:50 Dawkins' impression of John Mcenroe LOL
sutton513 1 week ago
jesus effin christ....how does Richard Dawkins keep his cool around these fuckwits....i won't blame him if one day during a "debate" he just snaps and starts choking the shit out one of these religitards
AntiSnoopDogma 1 week ago
I am sad that Richard Dawkins is turning 71 this year, I hope he lives longer because obviously, only someone like him can fight this war against religion. together with Michael Newdow, Dan Barker and some of the other guys, much respect..
juxtrkov 1 week ago
people that feel the need to tell the play-by-play of their lives when asking a question tend to not really have much of a question to begin with...they just wanted to have an excuse to vent in public, as do most of the fearful types that have to cling to some form of spaghetti monster for any hope. religious people just refuse to admit that they are escapists at heart looking for some amazing supernatural force to save the day and walk off into the sunset with them
lestermagoo 1 week ago
Speculation? hypothetical discussion? He said that there are alien gods!!!!!!!!!!!!11111!!!!!
Botjer1 1 week ago
@ Botjer1 -No, he said there could be aliens who would be so far advanced they would seem like gods. "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" -Arthur C Clark
To the semi-bald questioner with glasses; all holy books teach exclusive access to the one true god and intolerance. They all say kill the infidels, do not suffer a witch to live, homosexuality is an abomination, and s on...
It's not Dawkin's "chosen criteria" but the scientific method!
winston2015 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Botjer1 He said that there are alien gods!!!!!!!!!!!!11111!!!!! NO HE DIDNT ffs get it right. Words and meanings are important. LISTEN
wonbadood 1 week ago
It is ilogical to think that life cant exist else where in the universe as we can use the fact that we exisit as evidence that life CAN happen. Once we accept that life can happen, because it HAS happend here, then, its illogical to conclude it cant happen anywhere else. It would require far more evidence to prove we are the only ones in the universe, then to assume theres most likley other life forms in space. Therefore, by that standerd, the onus is on those claiming we are alone, to prove it.
Casper892 1 week ago
thank god im an athiest!
danfromlondon 1 week ago
"You cant imagine inheriting the genes from someone who wants to die, because they are dead." ......Ummmm......What??? What in the hell is that supposed to mean? What a lousy reasonless rebuttal to the question. I dont see how anyone can take Dawkins seriously.
studlypear05 1 week ago
@studlypear05, learn to read, learn to think, then read one of his many excellent books. His intellect is impressive, but only if you have the intelligence to understand what he's talking about.
timchilli 1 week ago
@timchilli it takes intelligence to recognize intelligence and you obviously are dearly lacking given the fact that you follow Dawkins nonsensical Horse manure. I feel sorry for you. Try reading more than one book besides Dawkins.
studlypear05 1 week ago
@studlypear05 Yes, I'm unintelligent, because I trust in evolution and obserable science. Whereas you're intelligent because you send thought-messages to an invisible man in the sky, and you were instructed to do this by a book written by sheep-herders from the Iron Age.
Yeaaaaahhhhhh.... okaaaaaaaaaaay....
timchilli 1 week ago
Comment removed
studlypear05 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timchilli Your statement of "thought-messages to an invisible man in the sky" just shows your ignorance of the Bible and the relationship between God and man. You are sadly mis-informed by religion and idiotic religious traditions. Again, you are trying to deal with me as if I was an ignorant religious slave to some church. I dont believe in religion or church. I believe in God and his personal relationship with me. I dont go to church, never have and never will.
studlypear05 6 days ago
"Alien civilizations on some other distant planet that are super human" HAHAHAHAHAHA "What's your evidence for that Dawkins?" Wow! Dawkins discounts the Bible and heaps of evidence of the existance of God yet he throws some cooky claim in his book about the existance of aliens with no evidence whatsoever. Wow! I cant believe anyone would give Dawkins the time of day. I feel sorry for Atheists who follow Dawkins. He's leading you no where blindly.
studlypear05 1 week ago
Comment removed
Casper892 1 week ago
"Hi, I read Richard's book one day on a beach in Greece...........WTF???? Wow, no one cares. He sure is intelligent.......NOT.
studlypear05 1 week ago
@studlypear05, you fail to comment on the inane ramblings of the fuckwit religious potatoes in the audience. You have no idea what intelligence is.
timchilli 1 week ago
Comment removed
studlypear05 1 week ago
He's a bear! Where's my Kia?
flightlessamps 2 weeks ago
Religious people are so repetitive and empty. Nothing new or interesting ever comes from them.
timchilli 2 weeks ago
@timchilli ?????.......i beg to differ. Both religious people and atheists are repetitive and empty. Most atheists have been hurt in one way or another by a religious group or ignorant religious people and then throw the baby out with the bath water by throwing God out with some religious nut who pissed them off or hurt their feelings. I enjoy God but I hate religion. Religion was made by men and is manipulated daily by men. I hate how many atheists have never sought out God for who He truely is
studlypear05 1 week ago
@studlypear05, as a rationalist, I have reasoned that there is no god. I have studied the bible from an early age, and have undertaking comparative religious studies. Nothing I have read or heard or experienced has made me think anything other than THERE IS NO GOD.
timchilli 1 week ago
@timchilli I was taught the Bible from an early age, didn't care for it much until I became born again of God's spirit, then I actually understood God, life and God's word. God and His word are spiritual and it takes spirit to understand it or else it makes no sense at all. I tested God out for myself, moved out from home at 18 without a dime to my name. I applied principles from God's Word and saw miracles, healings and God following through on His promises. We should talk, maybe I can help you
studlypear05 1 week ago
@studlypear05 So you admit to being indoctrinated before you could think rationally for yourself. Good. We're making progress. Next I'd like you to admit that if you'd been born in Saudi Arabia you'd be a muslim who regards christianity as a false religion and islam as the final religion.
timchilli 1 week ago
@timchilli What? Haha. Where is your reasoing going? lets talk christianity and not go off on an irrelevant tangent. Yes I was indoctrinated as a child but so what? so where you. You admitted it. Once I could think rationally, i stepped away from christianity and moved away from home and everything I ever knew. I dabbled and researched Atheism, philosophy and everything in between. I entertained Christianity again with ration, reason and perspective. I found...God is real!!!
studlypear05 1 week ago
@studlypear05 So you dabbled in empirical, falsifiable science and then reverted to religion? That, my friend, smacks of laziness. You WANT to believe, which is different from it ACTUALLY being so. I'm sad that you chose a path of willful ignorance, but that's your "cross to bear" as they say.
timchilli 1 week ago
@timchilli Sooo your calling your own belief in atheism "falsifiable science"? I just told you that i took the time to see life from your persepctive and understand the the reasons why you believe what you believe and you call me lazy. Wow! Your contradicting yourself my friend because you said you did the same in studying the bible/religion after indoctrination as a child and deicided to choose atheism just as I chose to choose God. How is your choice right and mine wrong?
studlypear05 6 days ago
@timchilli You WANT to believe that "God does not exist", which is different from it ACTUALLY being so. If I chose a path of ignorance, you chose a path of ignorance just the same. that's your....cross to share??? haha.
studlypear05 6 days ago
@timchilli In light of all your research with the Bible and God let me ask you this,...Did you ever become born again of God's spirit?
studlypear05 1 week ago
@studlypear05, nope. You can only be born once. Anyone who tells you any different is a liar.
timchilli 1 week ago
@timchilli I'm talking about receiving "spiritual life" when I say born again. Didn't you ever come across that concept when you studied the bible? 1 corinthians 2:14 tells us that we have to have spirit to understand God, it says "but the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned". If you don't have spirit its no wonder at all that God and His Word are foolishness to you.
studlypear05 6 days ago
@studlypear05. If you're going to cite scripture, how do you explain the following:
Exodus 21:1-7 (Rules for buying slaves)
Exodus 35:2 (Death for working on the Sabbath)
Ezekiel 9:5-6 (Murder women/children)
Deuteronomy 13:6-16 (Death penalty for apostasy)
Leviticus 19:19 (No mixed fabrics in clothing)
Leviticus 20:13 (Death for gay men)
...and keep in mind Matthew 5:17-19 (Jesus says he has come to enforce the laws of the Old Testament)
timchilli 6 days ago
@timchilli You still have not answered my question. in fact you are avoiding an honest and valid point that i decided to illuminate with a scripture verse. Why are you avoiding my question? You are trying to detract the progression of yours and my debate here simply because its not going in your favor. My purpose is not to throw facts back and forth for the sake of defending God. Im simply trying to show you something i see to be essential to understanding God that it seems you have never known
studlypear05 6 days ago
@timchilli The purpose of me quoting that scripture verse was to simply to give reference to my question for you. I want to know if you have ever explored the idea that God is spirit and that it might require us having spirit in order to understand/experience/recognize God? So, what do you think?
studlypear05 6 days ago
@studlypear05, to answer your question: no, I haven't, because "spirit" and all religious language is vague and meaningless. I explore science because it is empirical and can be tested objectively. I have no interest in fairy tales.
Now, answer my question about scripture verses below. Explain the verses I quoted.
timchilli 6 days ago
@timchilli Thanks for answering my question. Why are you so quick to dismiss the idea of God being spiritual? Have you tested it out for yourself and found a lack of evidence or evidence disproving its validity? Simply stating your opinion that all religious language is meaningless is not good enough and is just as foolish as the religious people who command belief in God because a book tells you to. Have you honestly looked into the topic of God being a spirit yourself?
studlypear05 6 days ago
@studlypear05, as I said, I'm not interested in testing the untestable. I may as well spend my time trying to disprove that there's an invisible teapot orbiting Mars. There is simply no point. Any conclusion I reach would be subjective and therefore invalid to objective, falsifiable observation.
Now, can you please explain the scriptures I quoted.
timchilli 6 days ago
@timchilli Whoa! but it is testable. You have been mis-informed. I thought you said you read the Bible? The way to test and prove that God exists and that He is Spirit is by "SPEAKING IN TONGUES" plain and simple. Acts 2:4 "they were all filled with Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues". Verse 8 "and how we hear every man in our own tongue". Verse 11 "we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God"
studlypear05 6 days ago
@timchilli I speak in tongues. I do it everyday. I have personally seen friends of mine speak in tongues and someone from a foreign country understand them because they were speaking there language from their country. My question to you is why dont you speak in tongues?
studlypear05 6 days ago
@studlypear05, that's some excellent trolling, sir. I commend you and bid you good day.
timchilli 6 days ago
@timchilli To answer your question about the verses you quoted from the old testament, first you gotta understand that all those commandments from the law were not God's desire. It was the people that wanted all those laws. The children of Israel wanted a king and a law like all the other nations at the time had. God cant control what people do, it was their decision to live under those laws. Jesus did not come to enforce those laws, he came to "FULFILL" those laws meaning accomplish them.
studlypear05 6 days ago
@studlypear05, what empty rhetoric you speak. You're truly an asset to christianity.
The bible is revered by the faithful as being the inspired word of god. The verses in it are inspired by god and therefore endorsed by him. What about god commanding the rape and murder of men, women and children of the Amalekites? How can you praise such a murderous, abominable deity that would order the destruction of men, women and children?
timchilli 6 days ago
@timchilli Jesus came to save mankind from the impossible task of "FULFILLING" the law, that was the whole point of his sacrafice, to save man from their own stupidity and the trouble they got themselves into because they chose to make their own laws and not follow God. I will quote a verse simply to show you that I am not making up what I am saying. Romans 10:4 says "For Christ is the end of the law".
studlypear05 6 days ago
@studlypear05, everytime you quote the bible to support your opinions, you lose credibility.
Every time you do this, I will respond with a verse which shows how stupid the book really is. For example...
Ezekiel 23:20 "There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses."
timchilli 6 days ago
@timchilli How do I lose credibility? Every verse I have addressed is relevant to our conversation. I'm sorry that it contradicts your personal opinions and views which are backed by nothing but your "rational observations". If your so adament that the Bible is a bunch of bull, why dont you have the balls to actually test it out? YOU LOSE CREDIBILITY everytime you hide from the logic that i present to you. You are being a coward. If you dont test it out, your a pussy!
studlypear05 6 days ago
@timchilli Everytime you refer to your atheists ideals that stem from your buddy Dawkins i will quote Dawkins....."Aliens exist". Two can play at this game. Dont be so cheap.
studlypear05 6 days ago
@studlypear05 there's no such thing as 'atheist ideals'. atheism is not a belief system.
geoffwoade 3 days ago
Wow!!! There was no profit to this whole show. There was no further discovery or enlightenment in either direction toward atheism or theism. This was nothing but back and forth bickering. Atheism is better!.......No, religion is better! No, shut up... your stupid because you believe in a God.....lets move on to the next question, no you believe in God too, not valid....next question. The host quickly dismissed any one arguing with reason. This was sad to watch, shame on the host for being biased
studlypear05 2 weeks ago
A lot of these arguments made during this show were kinda stupid compared to the arguments dawkins typically is faced with. Kinda sad that 2-3 people basically asked the same question with different wording.
HuliJingTheFox 2 weeks ago
I think the average IQ in that audience is potato.
Textra1 2 weeks ago 32
I really, really hope this audience is not genuinely representative of 21st Century Ireland. Sometimes the hardcore god squad hear about these debates and flood the place, so I hope for the sake of rational Irish people that this was the case, and that these aggressive nonsensical dogmatists are not the majority voice.
freddobum 2 weeks ago
So many dumb ass idiots in one place, just like a church... Mr D must have walked out of there thinking all hope was lost.
kooperman 2 weeks ago
@kooperman I think he walks around everywhere thinking all hope is lost about life in general. He has clearly shut out God from his life. Remmember, "God is Spirit"... "those that worship God must worship in spirit". How does one get spirit? Ya gotta get born again!!! How do people expect to understand the spiritual world and God by using their carnal physical mind and understanding. I dont understand how the brilliant Dawkins misses this fundamental principal. I guess he never read the bible.
studlypear05 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
timchilli 2 weeks ago
Why do audience members in this format ALWAYS have to think that anyone gives a shit about them and ramble about their own lives? Ask a question and then shut up!
iordaniames 2 weeks ago 10
@iordaniames It's symptomatic of their favouring of personal anecdote and subjective desirability over considering the big picture and attempting to approach something like objectivity. Maybe they do so because smart people are usually too polite to argue further when people get emotional and generalise from personal experience, which in turn gives them the idea that bringing in their life's story adds to the force of their arguments.
MaximisedInsight 1 week ago
These people are stupid.
ashburnhouse 3 weeks ago
Most of the audience have spent more of their lives stuffing themselves with cabbage, bacon and potatoes, than thinking.
mellowman1001 3 weeks ago
"i read his book, on a beach in greece". i don't understand people feeling the need to add stupid points like that. if you read it on a couch in your basement it would be the same. idiot
unholychunk 3 weeks ago 3
@unholychunk HAHA! I was thinking the same thing.
studlypear05 1 week ago
its so easy to side against the theists, they always, without a doubt, make themselves look stupid.
jussssig 3 weeks ago
Just a small side point, Pat Kenny is a great debate moderator, far better off without the Late Late
MrFrostedtips 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Such strong correlation between people's beliefs and the presentation of themselves:
The atheists here are articulate, cool-headed, and knowledgeable.
The faithful here are unclear, impetuous, and ignorant.
ryanrenesis 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
ryanrenesis 3 weeks ago
fuck me this audience is generally very stupid
garfrain 3 weeks ago
According to the first Law Energy can not be destroy nor be created then how it exist at first place?
Richar dawkin can you give me one example of mutation that is cause the increase in genetic complexity can you name One please........hahahahahh
strangerlover11 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@strangerlover11
hahahahaha "dawkin can you give me one example of mutation that is cause the increase in genetic complexity" Eso es lo que no comprenden muchos ateitos, es ahi en esas cosas que la ciencia no puede explicar donde Dios se convierte en la explicacion!!
TuAbuelaCatolica 3 weeks ago
I don't understand why theists keep jumping on Dawkins's alien remark. He is NOT claiming like it's a fact! It's just a guess! Meanwhile, you theists are the ones claiming God exists for a fact. If you want to claim it as a guess, then ok, my respect for you will go up. But that's not what you guys are doing. You are claiming your God as a fact, meanwhile Richard was merely throwing it out as a guess. Fact vs guess...get it? Jeez....
Casshyr 4 weeks ago
@Casshyr
I'm still trying to comprehend why they grab on to his alien ideology as if it aids their case.
ScreamingHorizon 3 weeks ago
@Casshyr Ummmm.... Jesus was a man that actually walked on the face of the earth. Enough said.
studlypear05 1 week ago
@studlypear05 yes, a man, not son of God.
Casshyr 1 week ago
@Casshyr A man that was raised from the dead after three days... how do you explain that if he wasn't the son of God? It was even prophesied many times hundreds of years before Jesus was even alive that God would raise him from the dead.
studlypear05 1 week ago
@studlypear05 yea, but Christianity isn't the only religion that speaks of resurrection, or even a prophesied resurrection. Plenty of other religions have the same thing too, and some are even older than Christianity. How can you say they are wrong?
Casshyr 1 week ago
@Casshyr studlypear05 deserves to be one of the stupid fucks in this audience.
killreligion666 1 week ago
2:40 => this guy's logic is basically like "if you are a Christian who rejects all other religions, you are ok. But if you are an atheist, that makes you a fundamentalist!"
Casshyr 4 weeks ago 2
Religious people need to stop whining about their feeling comfortable by believing in god. Heroin can also make you feel comfortable.
goldmonkey77 1 month ago
Dawkins is nothing but a good businessman who sold books to gullible people
ikawpipa 1 month ago 2
@ikawpipa and the bible were sold to people 10x more gullible.
N1nja32 1 month ago
@N1nja32 - in case you don't know, bibles are given freely most of the times .. you can ask a free copy from your nearest church. Unlike fake atheists who use a strawman god topic on their books and enrich themselves because many crusaders against god buy them.
ikawpipa 1 month ago
@ikawpipa As true as that may be, I am pretty sure there is a much higher percentage of people that read the bible. With that in mind I correct myself...
"and the bible is read by people 10x more gullible".
N1nja32 1 month ago
@N1nja32 - your god Dawkins said it's more probable to have aliens outer space.. where is the proof? .. or is Dawkins delusional?
ikawpipa 1 month ago
@ikawpipa He said it is more probable because IT IS more probable. Seriously, just think about it. Over the years science has proven that life on earth cannot live without water, and the evidence is highly on the side that says we evolved. Exactly like what Dawkins said, there are BILLIONS of planets out there.... which means is it VERY PROBABLE one of those planets has water like EARTH, which can sustain life to evolve. I am not even goign to respond to, "your god Dawkins". Just foolish.
N1nja32 1 month ago
@N1nja32 - i understand, but that is not science... until Dawkins prove that there's life out there, it will remain a fairytale and imagination, you are free to have faith and belief in dawkins but that is not science.
ikawpipa 1 month ago
@ikawpipa First of all I was not saying it was science, I was saying that there is science that supports the idea of aliens. And secondly, what difference does it make? This idea is more probable to be true and not delusional, than everything Dawkins claims that is delusional about God and religion. This is because at least we have evidence that it CAN be true meaning we believe we are less delusional than religious people. What evidence do religious people have that show they aren't delusional?
N1nja32 1 month ago
@N1nja32 - First of all, Dawkins is not talking about the God of the bible in his book... and that for sure is a delusion. Secondly, what about the near death experiences of atheists (Howard Storm) and others? .. almost all, if not all who experienced near death experience that there is a Supernatural being.... no one has said there's just spontaneous random chemical reactions and evolution happening there.
ikawpipa 1 month ago
@ikawpipa Arguing with you is pointless. First of all where is the proof that it actually was something supernatural? Not something one hallucinated due to fear. If you believe every story you hear you are way too gullible my friend. Try to think rationally without bias. And how do you know no one has said it was spontaneous random chemical reactions? And in the end, what would be more likely?
N1nja32 1 month ago
@N1nja32 And 10000x the sales... It amuses me how stupid this world can be! :)
RyanteGamer 1 month ago
Simply put, having a positive mental attitude can be helpful and effect change....an attitude is a belief....a belief is not necessarily true.
ottawa856 1 month ago
I understand what Richard means with the word "Very probable", the number of galaxies+the number of stars+the number of planets gives an untold large probability for life, so much, we can speculate that life could be so bizarre our imagination could never grasp it or understand it.
ateopuertorico 1 month ago
@ateopuertorico - i agree. ... but that is a religion and not science
ikawpipa 1 month ago
The religious mind is like an unbreakable shell, no one from the outside can break it, only he or her who is inside is the only one who can break free and accept the reality outside that safe haven.
ateopuertorico 1 month ago
I feel sorry for Richard. He's just figting a losing battle with these people. Doedn't really matter what you say, they don't listen.
zeik85 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
People were in the 21st century, grow a brain!!!! these religious people gave a weak reply, Science is open to the idea of the term god? which god will that be, allah,horus,jesus,krishna,zeus,thor,wotan,yaweh, or my personal favorite the flying spaghetti monster, who knows, but when you find out, give us call, and make sure your not on psychedelics,or easily prone to hallucination. cuz science is to busy improving your life with technology& education & helping you use your brain, k thanx.
erikAsuxxxweewee 1 month ago
Comment removed
erikAsuxxxweewee 1 month ago
Guy at 3:27 is as dumb as an atheist can get. He is using atheism to stop thinking.
pallfy20 1 month ago
I would have had a heart attack if i were in richards position. Amazingly chill!
majinleoking 1 month ago
dawkins is swimming up river when it comes to defending his cause.. and he will not succeed.
MrXMerchant 1 month ago
I love how there is a banner of stupid and ridiculous comments under Richards name as he is talking. you go Dick Dawkins...
degentrified 1 month ago
What the fuck is wrong with the audience at 5:49?
olwerXL 1 month ago 2
This man is a hero, he has to put up with fools like these all the time yet he still does it, what a trooper!
spredspred 1 month ago 13
Gentleman at 3:34 wins not only for not being a complete idiot, but also for reading the Selfish Gene on a beach in Greece.
WolfgangBrozart 1 month ago
Lol fucking Irish, thick as the potatoes they pick
TheSaintAza 1 month ago 2
As a person of Irish origins, I found this almost too embarrassing to watch.
babymicrobe 1 month ago 2
Comment removed
bicnarok 1 month ago
@babymicrobe the majority of the world are thick as a shell fish, not just Irish.
bicnarok 1 month ago
This 'debate' illustrates just how much Catholic 'theology' has fucked the Irish mentality generation after generation just like the Hill-Billy religion has screwed up the Southern States of America;listen to how peasant like the audience mentality is!!! They're still thinking in terms of Leprechans under the bed lol.
ScottyDavid1964 1 month ago 5
Phew,,, poor Richard having to rebut so much prejudice against not believing ideas based on... what? 2000+ year old hearsay -in the 21st century! When will humanity finally grow up?
sitemountain 1 month ago 4
Patience level: RICHARD DAWKINS
MrBuffaloGrill 1 month ago 4
An Irish atheist I feel so ashamed watching this crowd and Dawkin's debate opponent. Ignoring fact and reasoned argument in lieu of a good strong soundbite, one that's actual message is irrelevant once it has been shown to support the pro-god side of the debate.
stepheneamonn 1 month ago 3
1916
mariosumo 1 month ago
How could one, dispite there beliefs not have respect for Richard Dawkins. These creationists were ignorant to the point Richard wanted to pull his hair out. He remains calm even when out numbered by stupid people.
William Craig knows that even if he completely loses his ass debating Richard, the stupid and ignorant far outway the open minded people with a little common sense. So.....Craig wins even when he loses (which is every time he debates an atheist).
FreeMindedAthiest 1 month ago
Omg Richard must be frustrated to bits dealing with these numb nuts...I know i am.
thejokerceso 1 month ago
I am irish and i apologies for the stupidity and close minded attitude of my nation
shanehand91 1 month ago 38
@shanehand91 its very magnanimous of you to apologise for the catholic churches stultification of many of the inhabitants of your particular piece of rock, but they do it wherever they go and its neither your fault there or at home
ILIKEWALLS 4 weeks ago
@shanehand91 no worries man. I'm from America.......
libbotoppo 2 weeks ago
@shanehand91 I am not from Ireland but those in the video had their heads on straight and asked and presented honest questions which Dawkins or the host never cared to address.Any time someone from the audience persisted with a valid argument that Dawkins could not rebuttal the host would cut off the exchange and move to the next question. Very biased toward atheism if you ask me. Dawkins and the host showed to be close minded. You should be proud of your fellow countrymen, I am.
studlypear05 1 week ago
@studlypear05 i understand your argument but i was referring to the fact that they didn't try and embrace his thought pattern they kept to the same arguments which Dawkins answered as the audience couldnt see what he was saying they kept asking. I assure you if you had some people asking you the same question many times you too would get frustrated. On another note i am very proud of my country and i would die for my country (if we weren't such a peaceful nation).
shanehand91 1 week ago
My main issue with my countrymen and women is the way the catholic church has affected everyone's self thought i.e they dont have any. I understand that people believe in religion and it is a sense of hope etc. but it has changed this country immeasurable.
shanehand91 1 week ago
These people don't seem capable of an intellectual debate without consistently interrupting Richard.
lmos26 1 month ago
richard should punch that tit in the face, theres a difference in speculating in life on other planets by saying its most likely rather than there is.
saying their most likely is life on other planets is looking at our civilisation and saying there are other planets like ours therefor its probable that theres life on other planets.
there is no evidence of god apart from a man written book, a book is not the same level of evidence as planets that are in a habital zone to another star.
koplikop 1 month ago
I bet when she said "It's American" at 5:22 she was expecting the audience to give her a standing ovation
debenni 1 month ago
@debenni it's a miracle**
Razman360 1 month ago
Comment removed
studlypear05 1 week ago
This debate had so much potential. The christian Dawkins were supposed to debate with, is much more intelligent than the audience.
ProThesaurus 1 month ago
I wish people would stop trying to argue against science.
uriituw 1 month ago
oh god i suddenly regret being irish
cantosprofanae 2 months ago
@cantosprofanae Same :/ some very stupid people in that audience
MrGeorge138 2 months ago
@MrGeorge138 its almost shameful that people still think this way. i mean wow. we havnt made one step forawrd at all, and whats worse is that we havnt tried
cantosprofanae 2 months ago
@cantosprofanae, please, do not be!
A populist pulp program like the Late Late Show is not a yard stick for intelligent potential of the Irish. Pat Kenny's mission statement contains little concern for meaningful debate on issues like this. That kind of debate takes places outside the realms of RTE.
Non-believing Irish people are plentiful and, in my periphery, seem not to regret it.
studioROT 1 month ago
dawkins
(INTELLECTUAL HEAVY WEIGHT)
vs
christian guy
(ONE STEP ABOVE DOWNS SYNDROME VICTIM)
nguyenimproved 2 months ago 3
@nguyenimproved You're a very generous person. I should try to better myself by your example. I can only give that guy, 0.01 step above Downs. That makes me a lesser person than yourself, by two orders of magnitude. I guess I'm stuck with me, but I loved and thumbed up your post. Thanks :-)
somthinjustaintright 2 months ago
Wow, the classic finger-point of being close-minded as if it where to prove themselves correct. Label-making is just as ignorant as racism.
CheffBryan 2 months ago
5:40 dawkins dumbfounded by how stupid people are
ShaolinViolin 2 months ago 44
@ShaolinViolin not only him, unbelievable!!
bicnarok 1 month ago
@ShaolinViolin
really? i was dumbfounded before 1:00
Dreamerx47 3 weeks ago
the christian guy is an IDIOT
Johnandvanessa 2 months ago
Dawkins' s arguments are primary against religion. Because the question of being " somethin" instead of "nothing" is over any religion , ..maybe he is closer to the idea of god.
muyoisho1 2 months ago
"Aw, come on!"
Shitty day to be intelligent...
narutokage777 2 months ago
that guy w the moustache is fkn dope!
nigusberries 2 months ago
i gringe being irish watching that
MrJaytality 2 months ago 2
It's tragic that a large proportion of the population believe that their feelings have a deeper meaning which they claim, without any supporting evidence, supports the existence of deity.
audience2 2 months ago 2
@audience2 exacally as much as we value them our feelings meen nothing on a universal scale.
alexanderhulse 2 months ago
Did they stock the audience with idiots?
PJDolan1 2 months ago 2
Everything Dawkins says here is straight-forward, inarguable, irrefutable, logical and ... almost obvious! Why can't the audience get their retarded heads around these simple ideas? They are as dumb as dog shit.
huwrj 2 months ago
Comment removed
huwrj 2 months ago
shit , people ask stupid questions , like they r meaningfull
loly1969 2 months ago
leave that guy (@2:03) ALONE! cant you see he's freestylin?
72dew 2 months ago 2
@72dew lmao at freestyling hahahaha
yougonasorry 2 months ago
I think belief is an important thing, whether its believing in God or whoever...however when it becomes an organised reliegion then it becomes dangerous, as we've seen here with the catholic church it is too open for abuse, in this instance people start listening,and following, the beliefs of other humans who claim they represent a god. Think this is a distinction which needs to be made
CarlCobain 2 months ago
The man at 2:30 thinks he is young.
JGrayshon 2 months ago
The Irish are fucking thick!!!
1981WishBone 2 months ago