A misleading video, the Sea Harrier has well over 100 kills and has never been shot down however it could never stand up to an F 22, by far one of the best planes, lacking only in fire power when compared to say an F15E.
I love this curve in technology, the F22 is invisible to radar, soon all planes will be. It is too fast and agile for some A-A missiles, soon all planes will be. Thus we will be thrust back to simple cannons like in WW2.
@sblasus A) Unmanned are manned with a slight delay in reaction.
B) Saying a jet is shit on the ground is like saying a tank is shit while it's flying. But considering they can take off in half the space of most other fighters, it is actually better on the ground than most birds.
American propaganda. The same things they were telling us in the 60's before the war in Vietnam, how the new technology (radar guided missiles, BVR, the Raptor of that time F-4 Phantom) will give USAF absolute dominance in the sky. The result, more than 3500 aircraft down. Reality vs Propaganda 1-0.
@haarstad88 check the stats, every time soviet/russian fighter went against US fighter it lost. ex. Gulf War, Iraq war, Iran-Iraq war, iranians were using US F-14's.
There are obviously newwer, better, faster more advanced fighters allready finished and in the build. But the thing is why would you reveal that technology?
When (I have to be carefull on this subject) there isnt a need to put them on the line just yet. War = BIG figures and with a presure zone increasing they need more and better.
BANKER JEWS have the World DRUGGED with a NEUROTOXIN in their BRAINS delivered thru Cola's
Sodium in Cola is Really Hex-ACID watch them change the Name in film "PROFESSIONAL PERSPECTIVES" at "FLUORIDEALERT" it will eat up meat & Iron Nails, the Aluminum, Lead , Barium in Sodium Fluoride attaches to ends of Neurons in Brain
Take Pure Water Civilizations have risen & fallen for Lack of MAGNESIUM in soil see SCIENTIST on youtube=georgeeby
great promo vid but doesn't state the thing is a piece of shit on the ground. only when they are flying they do as advertised. The future is unmanned and the battle ground is space forget this piece of political shit and move to tommorrow.
hello, please compare to Euro flying fighting planes : Rafale does do it better, faster, stronger and witch a better much operational system than the raptor will have. this is obvious. raptor is not a multi combat warfare system (meaning multi combat and multi operation theater capabilities...), it is just a ground combat plane, this is what we can call propaganda...for US proud. bad.....
Lol, didn't sweden shoot down a whole squadron of these during red flag simply by turning off their radar and have a jet flying out of range feeding them the information instead? :-) No offense though, It's the worlds greatest fighter if you can afford it.
Sweden did crush almost all opposing planes that they fought against. However they never fought against the F-22 and that would be suicide, since F-22 is by far better than the Gripen.
But in the end, it does not matter how you kill them, pussy way or action way, as long as you win. Which they did.
-Plasma Stealth (This will help F-22 stay more invisible to enemy radar).
-Replace gun with Airborne Laser but add two of them on it. Since the YAL-1 operate Airborne Laser. The F-22 version of Airborne Laser should be small but firing more range to vaporize enemy aircraft.
-AIRST (Advnace Inferred Search and Target) system.
-Modernized and design new cockpit I would prefer the PCD cockpit that use on the F-35.
-Better and newer Instrument for the PCD cockpit.
-Powered the AIM-120D by Ramjet to give more range and same capabilites as Meteor missiles. Also better guidance using GPS Block 3, Sensor Fusion, and INS.
-Upgraded AIM-9X Block 2 to the same capabilities and guidance as Israeli Python 5.
But the Raptor fleet would still lack a number of features common to most modern fighters, including an infrared search and track sensor for passive targeting and a helmet-mounted cueing system to shoot at targets beyond the field of view of the fighter's air-to-air missiles. It is possible, however, that the USAF will add new capabilities to the F-22 beyond the Increment 3.2 upgrades. One example is a distributed aperture system which provides 360° optical coverage around the aircraft.
(87) F-22 upgraded to Block 35 the Block 35s will also be modernized with the USAF's most advanced AAM the AIM-120D and AIM-9X Block 2. The package, named Increment 3.2, also adds an automatic ground collision avoidance system and the multifunction advanced datalink. The latter will allow the F-22 to transmit data to other stealth aircraft. the 63 Block 30 aircraft to the Block 35 standard. If the proposal is accepted, the USAF would operate a fleet of 150 F-22s with identical capabilities.
(37) F-22 upgraded to Block 10 which include two types of production-representative test vehicles, to the Block 20 standard.
(63) F-22 upgraded to Block 30. The Block 30s are being upgraded with Increment 3.1 capabilities, which include air-to-ground and electronic attack modes for the APG-77 radar.
USAF, USN, and USMC should cancel the F-35 productions and program. They use the F-35 money program to built more F-22 and upgraded the F-22. The F-22 Raptor is the only fighter that stand a chance against Advance Sukhoi Fighters. The F-22 can survive from Russia and China advance SAM like S-500, S-400, S-300, Tor M2, SA-22, HQ-9, and HQ-19. Ausairpower websites will tell you the truth that USAF do need more F-22 Raptor. USN need naval version of F-22 Raptor.
Why can they just brought back F-22 Program and Production. The F-22 Raptor have a future while the F-35 doesn't not. So what if the F-35 is much cheaper than F-22. The F-35 can't turn, can't climb, can't run, and can't defeat Advance Sukhoi fighters. The Advance Sukhoi fighters Su-30MK variants, J-11 variants, Su-33, Su-34, Su-35, and Su-50 PAK FA. The F-35 Electro-Optical Targeting System & Electro-Optical Distributed Aperture System won't be much of help to find Sukhoi fighters a lot faster.
@chinaownseverything Yeah, if they were spring cleaning or something. Jets don't recieve that thorough of a job after every flight. Even if it did, that means every other jet would too, unless the other jet owners are working at 3rd world standards *coughRussiacough*. They check a jet after every flight and SEE if it needs maintenance. You make it sounds like the F-22 is a piece of unreliable crap that needs 43 new parts after every flight.
@notessimodude i make it sound? or is it actually. the reason other planes dont need as much maintanance is coz most other planes doesnt have stealth. obviously all planes in USAF are maintained to perform. but f-22 takes more cost and time
@chinaownseverything I watched a show and it said "...the F-22 is capable of way more than it's given credit for because of the pilot. The pilot can only maneuver so much before he begins to suffer physical conditions from gyro forces."
@ROOSTER10X The problem with the SU-47 is it doesn't have any weapon systems on board and they only built one or two prototypes. it's hard to win a dogfight without weapons unless you want to ram the other guy.
@ROOSTER10X The SU 47 is an experimental aircraft its just for demostrating Russia's technology and its not meant for air to air combat PLUS the f22 has proven a waste of time and money since its didn't not live up to its expectation and because its to expensive even the f35 have been somewhat dominated by some Russian fighters -_-
@xeppo ??? Theres NOTHING mentioned about Red Flag Or Gripen in that article or whatever that was, The topic was about US air supremacy in Taiwan and military predictions theories about possible US-China war. But nothing about the JAS 39.
here are some real facts:
-In a dogfight simulation in Norway the Gripen beat the SU35 1:6 to 1
-in a dogfight simulation done by DERA the F22 beat the SU35 10 to 1
@Stridus7 Gripen is Swedens 6 gen figther - first flight in 1988, active in 1996 (official) - the swedes had i stelth figther in the 50's - the germans in 44 - the "modern" version of stelth is just candy for the bigwigs.
The swedes was first - in almost everything in the air - they got all the good enginers from Germany in 44-45
Thy have av black airforce that is 50 year's ahed everything they show the marked.
The B2 bomber was build avfter a german ww2 design - the German Horten stelth figther
Okay i see your Swedish pride, I'll add to it by saying that Sweden had the 4th most powerful Air Force in the late WWII, way ahead of what France ever had. Also the delta wing was a Swedish invention.
However, 6th gen. does not exist, the current Gripen is a 4.5 gen. fighter and the F-22 would kick it's ass (as much as I love the Gripen I'll face the facts).
I am interested in the new Gripen though (not the Gripen NG/IN/Naval) but the one after that. The one on paper, not even built.
@Az3trk the Gripen is Swedens 6 gen - they are ahed the game. They follow the law of aerodynamics! They left vector trusting in the 50.. Stelth in 1980 - now it is just value for money!
Men snälla du lär dig lite om Svenskt Flygvapen och Svensk Flygvapenindustri genom tiden. Gripen är otroligt bra, den slår nästan alla flygplan, men inte F22. Och om dom lämna stealth i 1980 varför kommer det nu en stealth gripen (efter Gripen NG)??
I was just assuming you were Swedish, tell me if I'm wrong..
@Az3trk Sorta is the Swedes "black air force" - build on secret levitation tec. - its far ahead all others - look at Gripen and think + 100 year - F*** its grate.
German first stelth was Horten H2 (basic for the US B2 bomber 60 years later)
Vector Trusting was tested on R101x - VT is a brake! thats why it is garbage!
Draken took "cobra" in 55 - MIG 29 in 80's (and the Russians are better than US)
The Horten was a terrible stealth machine, even though you could call it stealth, it was no match for any fighter to kill, much much easier than an B 29.
Thrust vectoring is not a brake, it can be used as a brake but it is NOT a brake. Look it up
But you still didn't answer what Swedish plane had stealth and what swedish plane had thrust vectoring...
All the better man, all the better. See I hate arguing with fanboys like you. When you state a valid point, or any point in general, what do I do? I look up your source and I counter it with mine. When I state a valid point, what do you do? Invent things and say I'm wrong, giving no hard facts, no solid proof. Not even a counter to my argument.
And blocking me because I help to improve your English? That's childish dude. Immature and childish.
Also, your SORTA story is a lie. What right do I have to say that? Not only am I obsessed with airplanes, and military (and history in general), I am a friend to Lt. Col. Ken Lindberg, I know several (well two) Gripen pilots, many non-Gripen airforce pilots, I have been the the Swedish Flygskolan, and have full access to it, along with F3 and F17. I am also seeking to become a pilot myself.
Look I have no fucking idea what he's talking about, so I'm not saying this to support him. As far as I know what you said was right, but it's always good to add on to your sources so yeah please send the list to me..
it will see you before you see it.... orly, that's why the yanks got butthurt after the Eurofighter owned the f-22 and cancelled the rest of the exercise!
@archangel1092 you mean the coming one between China+Pakistan+myanmar against India+Russia+Japan+Taiwan? it all depends whether like in WW1 the USA gets pulling into a war it really has no interest in (in this case against China) if its after 2030 then China wins no question...
-F-15SE Silent Eagle (Export) with Stealth features such as Internal carriage w/fuel, Canted V-tails, & radar absorbent materials. F-15SE avionics include APG-82 v 1 (APG-63 v3 + APG-79), DEWS, DFCS, Sniper XR PANTERA, AIRST, & Link 16 fighter data link.
HISTORY 1ST FLIGHT TESTS with STEALTH-TAILLESS-THRUST-VECTORING Air Vehicle (1987, classified until May 2010) is now available to the public on Facebook "Benjamin Gal-Or". The new era in aviation, updated to June 2010, is also reviewed there via Comments.
WOW thats Langley fied. That place is legendary. My Grandfather would fly missions during WW2 in B-24 Liberators and he would be stationed in Langley Field. I still have a picture of him standing next to his plane.
Btw that Helmet and HUD arent updated. The current Helmet is so high tech it can see and target throuh the hull of the aircraft. It also has internal HUD. They forgot to mention the F22 can carry extra bombs and missiles ont he outside in exchange for stealth.
The F-22, so raw and yet to prove itself worthy, they crown it as king of the skies. The only aircraft in the world designed to fight poor and weaker third world countries.
@ericartwo1 Wrong! F22 still outperforms the F35. Why do you think it costs twice as much as an F35 and is only in the arsenal of the USAF? The F35 Joint Strike Fighter is designed for all services, so there is no chance it can be designed as elegantly as the F22.
@ericartwo1 Wrong! F22 still outperforms the F35. Why do you think it costs twice as much as an F35 and is only in the arsenal of the USAF? The F35 Joint Strike Fighter is designed for all services, so there is no chance it can be designed as elegantly as the F22.
@ericartwo1 Wow your ignorant. The F35 is going to be the next mass produced fighter that will replace the F-16 and F/A-18. THe US already has plans for selling loads of F35s to Europe. They would never sell a single F22 to ANYONE. its the USA's secret weapon.
@anden191 This may be true, but why would you need stealth in the rear? From behind, that means you're already in trouble and you're already running because they've already spotted you. :P
But my experience in combat flight sim games makes me think that most battles will be head-on, beyond-visual-range.
@anden191 WTF? Your you frickin stupid? The F22 is Stealth all over. Its shape is designed to give it 100% stealth all over. That would be pretty gay since you never know were the enemy radar is, so the moment you fly past it your detected. So sorry but no, your wrong.
Oh fuck off already with your advanced fighter planes and intercontinental ballistic missiles. Even with all of your technological might, you couldn't prevent a devastating aerial attack launched by *cough*19 amateurs with box cutters.*cough*
You've spent hundreds of millions of dollars in hopes of attaining some security, but you've attained none. Kind of ironic, no? And you still haven't learned your lesson.
Take back your government from the corrupt weasels that run it. Then talk peace.
@shaygahweh HAHA wow. And what country are you from that you talk down to the US? No one can mess with the US because the moment they nuke us one of our other hundreds of Missile silos (not to mention in submarines) can launch a nuke back at them. Thats what everyone is afraid of. No one can prevent mass damage from nuclear attacks but the US has missile detection technology that can detect a missile anywere in the world that is launched and intercept it. There will still be death though.
Satellite detection? That's awesome. Did those satellites provide you with intelligence pertaining, say, to Bin Laden's location?
Nationalism only serves to exploit the misinformed poor for the benefit of the greedy rich. Same pattern all throughout history... build loyalty to the king/state, wage wars against other nations, and hand over the spoils to the king. Nowadays, though, the king has been replaced by a wealthy class of corporatist fatasses.
F-22 is outdated. It's 20 years old, and it has a major flaw with the "stealth" system. The coating they use wears off quite a lot so it has to be reapplied way to often. Second, it's immensly expensive. And Russians already have a stealth fighter which can outmatch the F-22, the SU T-50.
@RazorAceYU New dosent mean better. The F-15 is pretty old and it has never been shot down by the enemy.
After all, this is Russia and their trying to keep up with America. We had stealth for a while now and their just now developing stealth aircraft. When they the B-2 spirits first rolled of the line everyone shat in their pants. Radar has been a key tool ever since the the 40's and 50's and to have an aircraft that couldnt be detected was the biggest weapon at the time.
True that radar is important but there's no such thing as the absolute stealth. F-117 was thought to be stealthy, yet it was shot down. Low tech radars are quite capable of detecting stealth jets.
Just because Russia recently got its first stealth fighter doesn't mean they are 20 years behind in tech development.Their technology could very well surpass that of the US.
@RazorAceYU Not really. If you've seen some of the new weaponry and aircraft that will be released within the next 10 years you'd know Russia still has catching up to do.
Many of your allies operate Su-27 and Su-30MK variants are too chicken to get in air combat or dogfight against F-15 in real shot down. They know the F-15 would just knock them out easily. The F-15 shot down (5) Iraqi, (4) Serbs, and (4) Syrian Mig-29 Fulcrum which is 4th Gen. aircraft during 1991 Gulf War, Kosovo War, and Israeli/Syrian airspace.
Very funny. Unfortunatly for you Indian Su30`s humiliated F15`s piloted by USAF themselfs. The USAF officer commenting on Red Flag 2008 didn`t share the same opinion with you about the F15. Actually he admitted that Su30 was a better fighter
No Syrian Mig29`s were ever shot down. Both Syria and Israel denied such thing to have ever happened.
Yugoslavian Mig29`s were in very poor condition. We both know that
So what if Su-30MKI defeat the F-15 but can't if defeat F-15 in real shot down probably not. The Su-27 and Su-30MK variants spend to much time doing clown circus trick at less time Air Combat dog fighting. The Su-30MKI use Russian, Indian, Israeli, and French avionics. The truth is Su-30MKI with Russian avionics can't defeat F-15. Also the truth is Su-30MKI beat F-15 by cheating using multiple nation avionics instead using origin avionics.
When you say that F15`s avionics are better,why should I and everybody who`s reading this believe you? Are you a pilot/engineer or maybe you have actual experience with military planes? Because if you`re not do not make comments like that again. Instead start reading some analysis written by well-known analysts or experts, like Carlo Copp for examples. Educate yourself. Start by reading some of the articles at ausairpower. net
Su-30 was two crew while the F-15C was only one crew. The F-15E Strike Eagle could beat Su-30MKI Flankers. The F-15E is two crews. The F-15E Strike Eagle equipped with new AESA radar like APG-82 v 1 (APG-63 v 3 + APG-79), Sniper XR, LITENING AT, TIGER Eyes electro-optical sensor, AN/ALQ-135, AN/ALE-55, & using F100-PW-232. The f-15E able to carry AIM-9X Block 2 & AIM-120D. There is no doubt that F-15E would beat Su-30MKI easily.
The Idea of an aircraft with minimal signature on radar was a russsian one. Russia did a lot of research on stealth technology, but soon they discovered that stealth compromises the overall aerodynamic performance of an aircraft and gave up that idea. All the research was declassifed and published on a book, which was later discovered by the americans and some of the data it contained was later used on the F117
UNITED STATES IS THE BEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ultra78721 1 year ago
A misleading video, the Sea Harrier has well over 100 kills and has never been shot down however it could never stand up to an F 22, by far one of the best planes, lacking only in fire power when compared to say an F15E.
I love this curve in technology, the F22 is invisible to radar, soon all planes will be. It is too fast and agile for some A-A missiles, soon all planes will be. Thus we will be thrust back to simple cannons like in WW2.
alex471996 1 year ago
@sblasus A) Unmanned are manned with a slight delay in reaction.
B) Saying a jet is shit on the ground is like saying a tank is shit while it's flying. But considering they can take off in half the space of most other fighters, it is actually better on the ground than most birds.
InfectedDingo 1 year ago
American propaganda. The same things they were telling us in the 60's before the war in Vietnam, how the new technology (radar guided missiles, BVR, the Raptor of that time F-4 Phantom) will give USAF absolute dominance in the sky. The result, more than 3500 aircraft down. Reality vs Propaganda 1-0.
supremeiq 1 year ago
-Not in production any more.
-You need at least 30 of them to have one fyable at every moment
-Price is way above any other
-Maintaince is expensive
-can't fly on rain
I say, eagle with good battlefield communication/overview is far better and less expensive option. So you just need to upgrade already good fighter.
moveaxebx 1 year ago
@Stridus7 they say the F-22B will have the F-15's speed, by then we'll be using the F-15se!
Spo3d 1 year ago
BUT bolth of you USA and RUSSIA are not close to the TALIBAN....
XBAGREMX 1 year ago
@XBAGREMX LOL!
Trashfished 1 year ago
the F-22 can deliver cupcakes, clean you room, finish your homework and "mute" your mother whenever she barges in to tell you do something
IT IS AWESOME!!!!
Ahamster1 1 year ago
the presenter for this show is soooooooooooooooooooooo lame.
sivadwerdna 1 year ago
@sivadwerdna well he's a lot better than you are!
TheRandification 1 year ago
@sivadwerdna he sounds like an ignorant redneck that he is
vk45de 1 year ago
its been proven many times that US fighters are superior to Russian/Soviet jets.
HawkXe 1 year ago
@HawkXe you guys like to think so :P
haarstad88 1 year ago
@haarstad88 check the stats, every time soviet/russian fighter went against US fighter it lost. ex. Gulf War, Iraq war, Iran-Iraq war, iranians were using US F-14's.
HawkXe 1 year ago
Incredibly agile? watch?v=CGbOs0vgYOA&feature=related
This is what we should call incredible agility.
vendetta007mike 1 year ago
Hmm, the thing is... these ar fairly old planes.
There are obviously newwer, better, faster more advanced fighters allready finished and in the build. But the thing is why would you reveal that technology?
When (I have to be carefull on this subject) there isnt a need to put them on the line just yet. War = BIG figures and with a presure zone increasing they need more and better.
hubbytweaked 1 year ago
F-14>F-15 eagle( retired F-15, bring back F-14, stop manufacturing F-22, save lot of money, problem solved!)
That Was Easy!
Berey23 1 year ago
Planes are sexy lil' things.
PivotB3stZ 1 year ago
@PivotB3stZ very true
itsMeAmyG 1 year ago
BANKER JEWS have the World DRUGGED with a NEUROTOXIN in their BRAINS delivered thru Cola's
Sodium in Cola is Really Hex-ACID watch them change the Name in film "PROFESSIONAL PERSPECTIVES" at "FLUORIDEALERT" it will eat up meat & Iron Nails, the Aluminum, Lead , Barium in Sodium Fluoride attaches to ends of Neurons in Brain
Take Pure Water Civilizations have risen & fallen for Lack of MAGNESIUM in soil see SCIENTIST on youtube=georgeeby
SOLDIERS get HIGH Dose FLUORIDE=CALLED SALTPETE
deadadelta 1 year ago
It looks like a toy.
BigMobe 1 year ago
Wow
I want one!
emptyhandninja 1 year ago
great promo vid but doesn't state the thing is a piece of shit on the ground. only when they are flying they do as advertised. The future is unmanned and the battle ground is space forget this piece of political shit and move to tommorrow.
sblasus 1 year ago 3
@sblasus why would you be worried about how it does on the ground if you are so concerned with space?
ohiodudemanguy 1 year ago
@sblasus Yup, it's the pilot that limits the performance of the aircraft. Unmanned is the way to go.
Bugstomper2 1 year ago
hello, please compare to Euro flying fighting planes : Rafale does do it better, faster, stronger and witch a better much operational system than the raptor will have. this is obvious. raptor is not a multi combat warfare system (meaning multi combat and multi operation theater capabilities...), it is just a ground combat plane, this is what we can call propaganda...for US proud. bad.....
ludovicesteves 1 year ago
hahaha remove the pilot and put him on a ground pc better >>>cuz if he is going to die in the end it will be something nasty and bad >>>> :)
kiss kiss salute
theshiningeagle 1 year ago
f-22 is the bitch of T-50
OlympianPierian 1 year ago
@OlympianPierian T50 is a prototype its not even capable for combat.
and if it does what makes you think it can win against the F22
Stridus7 1 year ago
@Stridus7 I have a similar question!
What makes you think (F-22) it can win against the Su T-50 ?
OlympianPierian 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@OlympianPierian T50 (Su50/Su51) wil be lesser stealthy than the F22, so the RWR radar wil pick it up easily. And the F22 can be used as a mini AWACS.
T50 wil not be recognise as a 5th gen fighter until 2016 by then the F22A would probably be upgraded to F22B
and lets not forget F35 radar jamming ability and the future stealthy F15SE and offcourse the 6th gen fighter F/A-XX.
T50 wil have to deal with alot of competition with US fighters.
dont put your hopes up to high on this T50
Stridus7 1 year ago
Comment removed
Stridus7 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GOD BLESS AMERICA
68AMX4SPEED 1 year ago
F-22 meet Su-50 and the J-XX when it comes out.
TheDustFactory 1 year ago
Am in air cadets so i need to no alot about planes and boy this is shweet XD
rowntreesmith 1 year ago
All you guys that critique this aircraft bad are just jealous like most commies are of this country :P no offense...
ARodBiz 1 year ago
it's such a great plane....why did they stop development on it?
mstep3 1 year ago
Lol, didn't sweden shoot down a whole squadron of these during red flag simply by turning off their radar and have a jet flying out of range feeding them the information instead? :-) No offense though, It's the worlds greatest fighter if you can afford it.
kazath 1 year ago
@kazath
Sweden did crush almost all opposing planes that they fought against. However they never fought against the F-22 and that would be suicide, since F-22 is by far better than the Gripen.
But in the end, it does not matter how you kill them, pussy way or action way, as long as you win. Which they did.
Az3trk 1 year ago
-Plasma Stealth (This will help F-22 stay more invisible to enemy radar).
-Replace gun with Airborne Laser but add two of them on it. Since the YAL-1 operate Airborne Laser. The F-22 version of Airborne Laser should be small but firing more range to vaporize enemy aircraft.
SilentEagles 1 year ago
@SilentEagles this is not science fiction o_O
the current laser is heavy and slow AND we dont even have any research on plasma stealth o_O wat are u on about anyways
Michaelasds 1 year ago
F-22 Raptor missing upgrades:
-3D Thrust Vectoring Control
-AIRST (Advnace Inferred Search and Target) system.
-Modernized and design new cockpit I would prefer the PCD cockpit that use on the F-35.
-Better and newer Instrument for the PCD cockpit.
-Powered the AIM-120D by Ramjet to give more range and same capabilites as Meteor missiles. Also better guidance using GPS Block 3, Sensor Fusion, and INS.
-Upgraded AIM-9X Block 2 to the same capabilities and guidance as Israeli Python 5.
SilentEagles 1 year ago
But the Raptor fleet would still lack a number of features common to most modern fighters, including an infrared search and track sensor for passive targeting and a helmet-mounted cueing system to shoot at targets beyond the field of view of the fighter's air-to-air missiles. It is possible, however, that the USAF will add new capabilities to the F-22 beyond the Increment 3.2 upgrades. One example is a distributed aperture system which provides 360° optical coverage around the aircraft.
SilentEagles 1 year ago
(87) F-22 upgraded to Block 35 the Block 35s will also be modernized with the USAF's most advanced AAM the AIM-120D and AIM-9X Block 2. The package, named Increment 3.2, also adds an automatic ground collision avoidance system and the multifunction advanced datalink. The latter will allow the F-22 to transmit data to other stealth aircraft. the 63 Block 30 aircraft to the Block 35 standard. If the proposal is accepted, the USAF would operate a fleet of 150 F-22s with identical capabilities.
SilentEagles 1 year ago
F-22 Raptor major upgrade from Flightglobal news:
(37) F-22 upgraded to Block 10 which include two types of production-representative test vehicles, to the Block 20 standard.
(63) F-22 upgraded to Block 30. The Block 30s are being upgraded with Increment 3.1 capabilities, which include air-to-ground and electronic attack modes for the APG-77 radar.
SilentEagles 1 year ago
USAF, USN, and USMC should cancel the F-35 productions and program. They use the F-35 money program to built more F-22 and upgraded the F-22. The F-22 Raptor is the only fighter that stand a chance against Advance Sukhoi Fighters. The F-22 can survive from Russia and China advance SAM like S-500, S-400, S-300, Tor M2, SA-22, HQ-9, and HQ-19. Ausairpower websites will tell you the truth that USAF do need more F-22 Raptor. USN need naval version of F-22 Raptor.
SilentEagles 1 year ago
@SilentEagles I dont think the US wil ever fund a navy version of the F22. Shame because a F22 with swing wings would be amazing sight.
besides Boeing is developing this fighter instead
/watch?v=Xqi_5GRRYMY
Stridus7 1 year ago
@Stridus7
Sweden has a destroyer version of the F22 actually.
Although I don't think you can compare the two, however the boat has no wake and is not picked up on radar.
Az3trk 1 year ago
@Az3trk give me a source of that information
Stridus7 1 year ago
@Stridus7 Of the corvette? The Visby Class. Look it up.
Az3trk 1 year ago
@Az3trk oh the corvette ship, yea there pretty impressive, nice looking too
Stridus7 1 year ago
Why can they just brought back F-22 Program and Production. The F-22 Raptor have a future while the F-35 doesn't not. So what if the F-35 is much cheaper than F-22. The F-35 can't turn, can't climb, can't run, and can't defeat Advance Sukhoi fighters. The Advance Sukhoi fighters Su-30MK variants, J-11 variants, Su-33, Su-34, Su-35, and Su-50 PAK FA. The F-35 Electro-Optical Targeting System & Electro-Optical Distributed Aperture System won't be much of help to find Sukhoi fighters a lot faster.
SilentEagles 1 year ago
@SilentEagles The F-22 Production is halted it is going to be made later in other words.
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago
WATCH OUT iran, you have no idea who you're dealing with!!!
worldchampion1986 1 year ago
EMP vs USA
deathscythekim729 1 year ago
---Concorde's Successor---
View channel for info...
VirginSupersonic 1 year ago
have a look to a new one, yf23
spyiro2007 1 year ago
Ох и складно же бают... :)
ф-15 на разу не сбитый... :)
ф-22 самый манёвренный... :)
GenaMatogen 1 year ago
The F-15 was never shut down? 2 american F-15 were shot down by AAA & SA-7 Grail. 2 japanese ones were destroyed by AIM-9 Sidewinder.
13 other F-15 were destroyed by accidents.
G0LD3NGAM3R1989 1 year ago
@G0LD3NGAM3R1989 in a dogfight
pwnage0013 1 year ago
the usual american bullshit ....."ours is the best etc"
Usaf have never engaged any serious enemies in conflicts apart from the Iraq conflict...
At air shows no american wanted a dogfight with the SU-37...
The f-22 is good , but it certainly has a LOT of worthy enemies, and depending on the pilot , it can get its ass kicked any time
Richkov 1 year ago
@Richkov I'm fairly sure the SU-37-loving Russians wouldn't want a dogfight with the F-22 either...
notessimodude 1 year ago
@notessimodude they wont 1 hour of f-22 flight is 30 hrs of maintanance.
chinaownseverything 1 year ago
@chinaownseverything That's bull, are you stupid?
notessimodude 1 year ago
@notessimodude its not bull. f-22 is expensive in maintanence. especially the paint and the modular parts that make up stealth in general.
chinaownseverything 1 year ago
@chinaownseverything Yeah, if they were spring cleaning or something. Jets don't recieve that thorough of a job after every flight. Even if it did, that means every other jet would too, unless the other jet owners are working at 3rd world standards *coughRussiacough*. They check a jet after every flight and SEE if it needs maintenance. You make it sounds like the F-22 is a piece of unreliable crap that needs 43 new parts after every flight.
notessimodude 1 year ago
@notessimodude i make it sound? or is it actually. the reason other planes dont need as much maintanance is coz most other planes doesnt have stealth. obviously all planes in USAF are maintained to perform. but f-22 takes more cost and time
chinaownseverything 1 year ago
@chinaownseverything Umm... you make it sounds that way, but it's not true. I said the whole thing once, please don't make me say it again.
notessimodude 1 year ago
@notessimodude i dont make it sound that way. look it up. the truth is there for those who wanna know.
chinaownseverything 1 year ago
@chinaownseverything Ok, ok. Obviously this conversation is on a road to nowhere. Lol, let's just end it here.
notessimodude 1 year ago
@notessimodude its defenitely nice plane though
chinaownseverything 1 year ago
@chinaownseverything I watched a show and it said "...the F-22 is capable of way more than it's given credit for because of the pilot. The pilot can only maneuver so much before he begins to suffer physical conditions from gyro forces."
notessimodude 1 year ago
@notessimodude .....who knows , maybe you are right ;)
Richkov 1 year ago
@Richkov Umm... ok. Thanks, I guess.
notessimodude 1 year ago
@rapehitler the SU-47 for example........ its way better than the F22 in most if not all of its aspects
ROOSTER10X 1 year ago
@ROOSTER10X The problem with the SU-47 is it doesn't have any weapon systems on board and they only built one or two prototypes. it's hard to win a dogfight without weapons unless you want to ram the other guy.
macuss87 1 year ago
@ROOSTER10X The SU 47 is an experimental aircraft its just for demostrating Russia's technology and its not meant for air to air combat PLUS the f22 has proven a waste of time and money since its didn't not live up to its expectation and because its to expensive even the f35 have been somewhat dominated by some Russian fighters -_-
drybone12 1 year ago
71 people are Russian.
rapehitler 1 year ago
ya are so fulish to belive this plane dosent have any true enemies the russians have a plane 10x better
ROOSTER10X 1 year ago
@ROOSTER10X whats it called?
rapehitler 1 year ago
FUck israel
TheDetective1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fuck usa and fuck israel
TheDetective1 1 year ago
future weapon? this model is at least 13 yrs old
fdesouchecom 1 year ago
to counteract the m5 missiles we could build fighter jet drones that go m7 !
shutupstupid9 1 year ago
it was killed in RED FLAG by the Gripen!
gripen is the real hunter..
xeppo 1 year ago
@xeppo no it dint.... what the hell are you talking about
Stridus7 1 year ago
@Stridus7 read man - google RED FLAG!!
xeppo 1 year ago
googel RED FLAG
xeppo 1 year ago
@xeppo I did, the Gripen participated in the Alaska Red Flag exercise in 2006 and went up against F16C, CF18 and F15J.
And also participated in the Nevada Red Flag exercise in 2008 where it went up against F15E and F16C
But there's no statement anywhere it even went up against the F22 in neither of them.
so your statement is false.
I can shown you the entire 2005-2010 Red Flag exercise list if you want.
Stridus7 1 year ago
@Stridus7 Gripen kill F22 - 100% sure - se this! mossekongen.no/downloads/2008_RAND_Pacific_View_Air_Combat_Briefing.pdf
xeppo 1 year ago
@xeppo ??? Theres NOTHING mentioned about Red Flag Or Gripen in that article or whatever that was, The topic was about US air supremacy in Taiwan and military predictions theories about possible US-China war. But nothing about the JAS 39.
here are some real facts:
-In a dogfight simulation in Norway the Gripen beat the SU35 1:6 to 1
-in a dogfight simulation done by DERA the F22 beat the SU35 10 to 1
conclusion: F22 IS WAY BETTER THAN GRIPEN
Stridus7 1 year ago
@Stridus7 The RAND analysis in neutral - DERA is not. Im from Norway - to use a simulation from here is like USA!
Sweden rules air combat + 10 ...
xeppo 1 year ago
@xeppo If you are from Norway then you should know that the Norway airforce wil buy F35 because it won against competition too the Gripen.
same goes with Dutch airforce.
You know Saab is working on a stealth fighter together with South Korea look foward to that.
im looking foward to Boeing's 6th gen fighter.
Stridus7 1 year ago
@Stridus7 Gripen is Swedens 6 gen figther - first flight in 1988, active in 1996 (official) - the swedes had i stelth figther in the 50's - the germans in 44 - the "modern" version of stelth is just candy for the bigwigs.
The swedes was first - in almost everything in the air - they got all the good enginers from Germany in 44-45
Thy have av black airforce that is 50 year's ahed everything they show the marked.
The B2 bomber was build avfter a german ww2 design - the German Horten stelth figther
xeppo 1 year ago
@xeppo 6 gen, wtf? gripen is 4.5 generation, his is a 5th gen aircraft my friend and would destroy the gripen... end of
LozSlater94 1 year ago
@xeppo
Okay i see your Swedish pride, I'll add to it by saying that Sweden had the 4th most powerful Air Force in the late WWII, way ahead of what France ever had. Also the delta wing was a Swedish invention.
However, 6th gen. does not exist, the current Gripen is a 4.5 gen. fighter and the F-22 would kick it's ass (as much as I love the Gripen I'll face the facts).
I am interested in the new Gripen though (not the Gripen NG/IN/Naval) but the one after that. The one on paper, not even built.
Az3trk 1 year ago
@Az3trk the Gripen is Swedens 6 gen - they are ahed the game. They follow the law of aerodynamics! They left vector trusting in the 50.. Stelth in 1980 - now it is just value for money!
xeppo 1 year ago
@xeppo
Men snälla du lär dig lite om Svenskt Flygvapen och Svensk Flygvapenindustri genom tiden. Gripen är otroligt bra, den slår nästan alla flygplan, men inte F22. Och om dom lämna stealth i 1980 varför kommer det nu en stealth gripen (efter Gripen NG)??
I was just assuming you were Swedish, tell me if I'm wrong..
Az3trk 1 year ago
@Az3trk Norwegian! Gripen kill F22 - for sure!
What i know about it is more - what about "Sorta" - do you konw about that?
Gripen is the best - now!
The marked need !"stelth" - not a better product as Gripen.
The Germans made Stelth in 45 - thats how old it is - vector trusting also (left by the sweden in 50's)..
xeppo 1 year ago
@xeppo
SORTA = Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority??
Being Swedish i thank you for your acknowledgment of Swedish things, however the F-22 is better than the JAS-39.
Okay so what German plane had stealth?
What Swedish plane had Stealth?
What Swedish plane had thrust vectoring??
Answer those questions.
Az3trk 1 year ago
@Az3trk Sorta is the Swedes "black air force" - build on secret levitation tec. - its far ahead all others - look at Gripen and think + 100 year - F*** its grate.
German first stelth was Horten H2 (basic for the US B2 bomber 60 years later)
Vector Trusting was tested on R101x - VT is a brake! thats why it is garbage!
Draken took "cobra" in 55 - MIG 29 in 80's (and the Russians are better than US)
xeppo 1 year ago
@xeppo
Okay I am getting tired of you.
The Horten was a terrible stealth machine, even though you could call it stealth, it was no match for any fighter to kill, much much easier than an B 29.
Thrust vectoring is not a brake, it can be used as a brake but it is NOT a brake. Look it up
But you still didn't answer what Swedish plane had stealth and what swedish plane had thrust vectoring...
Az3trk 1 year ago
@Az3trk
- VT is wrong - cannard is right.
- VT was tested on R 101x (look it up)
- Try to kill a Gripen - it is better then Stelth... Stelth is candy for politic's.. just candy!
xeppo 1 year ago
@xeppo
You said SORTA was Swedish Black Air Force - not german.
I don't get what you're trying to say, what about thrust vectoring and what about a canard?.
Okay send me the source to you're info, the only R 101 i know of is a post-war Russian version of German Wasserfall surface-to-air missile.
Stop bringing up candy. Also if Gripen is better than stealth why are they making a stealth Gripen?
And how old are you? I have a feeling you're 12 or something.
Az3trk 1 year ago
@Az3trk ok.. Forget SORTA - its more secret that i realised.
R 101 is the kodename for the model, it is from 47 - first they made 21R and J 29. All the time they worked and tested on R 101.
They make Gripen Stelth for the marked (the marked ask for it) - it will never beat the real Gripen..
xeppo 1 year ago
@xeppo
Hm, I'll ask Ken next time I see him and then I'll get back to you about it. But neither the 29R or the J29 are stealth....
No, the market asked for Gripen NG. The Gripen Stealth isn't even solid on paper yet...
(and its spelled stealth not stelth)
Az3trk 1 year ago
@Az3trk You dont need to do anything - you corrected my spelling and you are now blocked - i will never respond to you anymore.
xeppo 1 year ago
@xeppo
All the better man, all the better. See I hate arguing with fanboys like you. When you state a valid point, or any point in general, what do I do? I look up your source and I counter it with mine. When I state a valid point, what do you do? Invent things and say I'm wrong, giving no hard facts, no solid proof. Not even a counter to my argument.
And blocking me because I help to improve your English? That's childish dude. Immature and childish.
Az3trk 1 year ago
@xeppo
Also, your SORTA story is a lie. What right do I have to say that? Not only am I obsessed with airplanes, and military (and history in general), I am a friend to Lt. Col. Ken Lindberg, I know several (well two) Gripen pilots, many non-Gripen airforce pilots, I have been the the Swedish Flygskolan, and have full access to it, along with F3 and F17. I am also seeking to become a pilot myself.
Az3trk 1 year ago
@Az3trk SORTA is not a lie - also from ww2-Germany (from DHVSS)
xeppo 1 year ago
@Stridus7
No, Norway bought the F-35 for political reasons and relations with the USA and NATO..
Az3trk 1 year ago
@xeppo SAAB say that the F-22 is better, Sweden admit that F-22 is better, why you cant is beyond me though.
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago 3
@TheMilitaryTactics Read the Rand analysis!
It's a looser - not a figther!
xeppo 1 year ago
@xeppo What the Gripen?
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Gripen kill F22 - 100% sure - se this!
mossekongen.no/downloads/2008_RAND_Pacific_View_Air_Combat_Briefing.pdf
xeppo 1 year ago
@Stridus7
Look I have no fucking idea what he's talking about, so I'm not saying this to support him. As far as I know what you said was right, but it's always good to add on to your sources so yeah please send the list to me..
Az3trk 1 year ago
he forgot something.....the F-22 has..........thrust vectoring
aval1998 1 year ago
thats because most amercan politicians and generals dont have the balls to nuke people
pattysmith2224 1 year ago
it will see you before you see it.... orly, that's why the yanks got butthurt after the Eurofighter owned the f-22 and cancelled the rest of the exercise!
LordV4derofcheem 1 year ago
Hi ...Israel get ready to surrunder to collation of democratic forces...
democracyoreugenics 1 year ago
Giuen Outright Google Groups
Defense & Security Application Forum
Giuelith 1 year ago
ww3, who do you think would win ? :O
archangel1092 1 year ago
@archangel1092 you mean the coming one between China+Pakistan+myanmar against India+Russia+Japan+Taiwan? it all depends whether like in WW1 the USA gets pulling into a war it really has no interest in (in this case against China) if its after 2030 then China wins no question...
thorkelson 1 year ago
@archangel1092 not amarica cause they would start the war
warmanzp 1 year ago
Untested in actual combat. May have to send some over to N.Korea if something jumps off. I'd really like to see them try and fight this.
Truemoderate 1 year ago
how much do they cost ? now that obahama had announced its production halt?
jasanpahaf 1 year ago
F-15 Eagle Family Variants:
-F-15C/D Eagle (USA)
-F-15DJ Peace Eagle (Japan)
-F-15E Strike Eagle (USA)
-F-15S Desert Eagle (Saudi Arabia)
-F-15I Thunder Eagle (Israel)
-F-15K Slam Eagle (South Korea)
-F-15SG Singapore Strike Eagle (Singapore)
-F-15SE Silent Eagle (Export) with Stealth features such as Internal carriage w/fuel, Canted V-tails, & radar absorbent materials. F-15SE avionics include APG-82 v 1 (APG-63 v3 + APG-79), DEWS, DFCS, Sniper XR PANTERA, AIRST, & Link 16 fighter data link.
USAAIRPOWER 1 year ago
@USAAIRPOWER What about the F-15 MTD and F-15 Active? They haven't seen combat but they're still variations of the F-15 made by Nasa.
JamesL510 1 year ago
dogfighting is a thing of the past, and the cannon is just not needed these days
pgjr00 1 year ago
Damn i have a lot of comments but i have a lot of responses to other comments.
thegamerman7 1 year ago
F22 it is future weapon? LOL
ReDDDgo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HISTORY 1ST FLIGHT TESTS with STEALTH-TAILLESS-THRUST-VECTORING Air Vehicle (1987, classified until May 2010) is now available to the public on Facebook "Benjamin Gal-Or". The new era in aviation, updated to June 2010, is also reviewed there via Comments.
1Bengalor 1 year ago
WOW thats Langley fied. That place is legendary. My Grandfather would fly missions during WW2 in B-24 Liberators and he would be stationed in Langley Field. I still have a picture of him standing next to his plane.
Btw that Helmet and HUD arent updated. The current Helmet is so high tech it can see and target throuh the hull of the aircraft. It also has internal HUD. They forgot to mention the F22 can carry extra bombs and missiles ont he outside in exchange for stealth.
thegamerman7 1 year ago
The F-22, so raw and yet to prove itself worthy, they crown it as king of the skies. The only aircraft in the world designed to fight poor and weaker third world countries.
zaho87 1 year ago
The Joint Strike Fighter, the F35 out performs this ancient fighter!
ericartwo1 1 year ago
@ericartwo1 Wrong! F22 still outperforms the F35. Why do you think it costs twice as much as an F35 and is only in the arsenal of the USAF? The F35 Joint Strike Fighter is designed for all services, so there is no chance it can be designed as elegantly as the F22.
Jason733i 1 year ago 2
@Jason733i How old is the Raptor?
ericartwo1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ericartwo1 Wrong! F22 still outperforms the F35. Why do you think it costs twice as much as an F35 and is only in the arsenal of the USAF? The F35 Joint Strike Fighter is designed for all services, so there is no chance it can be designed as elegantly as the F22.
Jason733i 1 year ago
@ericartwo1 Wow your ignorant. The F35 is going to be the next mass produced fighter that will replace the F-16 and F/A-18. THe US already has plans for selling loads of F35s to Europe. They would never sell a single F22 to ANYONE. its the USA's secret weapon.
thegamerman7 1 year ago
maybe stealth but cant escape s400
hmodywakid 1 year ago
Dudes, the f-22 has a bad radar, jas 39 gripen's radar is much better, And the f-22 is only stealth in the front
anden191 1 year ago
@anden191 This may be true, but why would you need stealth in the rear? From behind, that means you're already in trouble and you're already running because they've already spotted you. :P
But my experience in combat flight sim games makes me think that most battles will be head-on, beyond-visual-range.
17589 1 year ago
@anden191 WTF? Your you frickin stupid? The F22 is Stealth all over. Its shape is designed to give it 100% stealth all over. That would be pretty gay since you never know were the enemy radar is, so the moment you fly past it your detected. So sorry but no, your wrong.
thegamerman7 1 year ago
hey my dad designed that!
TechnoBuddy 1 year ago
WOW REALY?! nerd...
Minamoto77 1 year ago
@Minamoto77 no srsly haha
TechnoBuddy 1 year ago
i want one
ilikedogdognag 1 year ago
lol these planes are so AA avoidable for one reason it blows it self up ^^
mafiasfriend 1 year ago
Oh fuck off already with your advanced fighter planes and intercontinental ballistic missiles. Even with all of your technological might, you couldn't prevent a devastating aerial attack launched by *cough*19 amateurs with box cutters.*cough*
You've spent hundreds of millions of dollars in hopes of attaining some security, but you've attained none. Kind of ironic, no? And you still haven't learned your lesson.
Take back your government from the corrupt weasels that run it. Then talk peace.
shaygahweh 1 year ago
@shaygahweh
Dude, you are fucking right. I am an American and i totally agree with you.
scarface8999 1 year ago
@shaygahweh Im Kiwi and i agreee
oM21o 1 year ago
@shaygahweh HAHA wow. And what country are you from that you talk down to the US? No one can mess with the US because the moment they nuke us one of our other hundreds of Missile silos (not to mention in submarines) can launch a nuke back at them. Thats what everyone is afraid of. No one can prevent mass damage from nuclear attacks but the US has missile detection technology that can detect a missile anywere in the world that is launched and intercept it. There will still be death though.
thegamerman7 1 year ago
@shaygahweh /watch?v=6w-ql8msl0U&feature=related
And satalite detection.
Yes we have our cake and eat it too.
thegamerman7 1 year ago
@thegamerman7
Satellite detection? That's awesome. Did those satellites provide you with intelligence pertaining, say, to Bin Laden's location?
Nationalism only serves to exploit the misinformed poor for the benefit of the greedy rich. Same pattern all throughout history... build loyalty to the king/state, wage wars against other nations, and hand over the spoils to the king. Nowadays, though, the king has been replaced by a wealthy class of corporatist fatasses.
shaygahweh 1 year ago
@shaygahweh If it works.
And Bin Laden and a cruise missile are 2 diffrent things.
One is big fast and metal, the other is small slow and fleshy.
thegamerman7 1 year ago
F-22 is outdated. It's 20 years old, and it has a major flaw with the "stealth" system. The coating they use wears off quite a lot so it has to be reapplied way to often. Second, it's immensly expensive. And Russians already have a stealth fighter which can outmatch the F-22, the SU T-50.
RazorAceYU 1 year ago
@RazorAceYU yf-22 is 14 years old f-22 raptor 2003
american1812 1 year ago
@RazorAceYU Lol the SU T-50 is nothing to be afraid of.
thegamerman7 1 year ago
@thegamerman7
I wouldn't be so quick to judge. SU t-50 is after all a much more modern fighter than F-22.
RazorAceYU 1 year ago
@RazorAceYU New dosent mean better. The F-15 is pretty old and it has never been shot down by the enemy.
After all, this is Russia and their trying to keep up with America. We had stealth for a while now and their just now developing stealth aircraft. When they the B-2 spirits first rolled of the line everyone shat in their pants. Radar has been a key tool ever since the the 40's and 50's and to have an aircraft that couldnt be detected was the biggest weapon at the time.
thegamerman7 1 year ago
@thegamerman7
True that radar is important but there's no such thing as the absolute stealth. F-117 was thought to be stealthy, yet it was shot down. Low tech radars are quite capable of detecting stealth jets.
Just because Russia recently got its first stealth fighter doesn't mean they are 20 years behind in tech development.Their technology could very well surpass that of the US.
RazorAceYU 1 year ago
@RazorAceYU Not really. If you've seen some of the new weaponry and aircraft that will be released within the next 10 years you'd know Russia still has catching up to do.
thegamerman7 1 year ago
@thegamerman7
F15 has never been shot down because it has never fought against an adversary with similar capabilities like the Su27
2nd, 3rd gen. fightes, helicopters and subsonic ground attack aircraft are everything the Eagle has faced till now
Actually the F117 is based in declassified Russian research
stalingradComando 1 year ago
@stalingradComando
Many of your allies operate Su-27 and Su-30MK variants are too chicken to get in air combat or dogfight against F-15 in real shot down. They know the F-15 would just knock them out easily. The F-15 shot down (5) Iraqi, (4) Serbs, and (4) Syrian Mig-29 Fulcrum which is 4th Gen. aircraft during 1991 Gulf War, Kosovo War, and Israeli/Syrian airspace.
USAAIRPOWER 1 year ago
@USAAIRPOWER
Very funny. Unfortunatly for you Indian Su30`s humiliated F15`s piloted by USAF themselfs. The USAF officer commenting on Red Flag 2008 didn`t share the same opinion with you about the F15. Actually he admitted that Su30 was a better fighter
No Syrian Mig29`s were ever shot down. Both Syria and Israel denied such thing to have ever happened.
Yugoslavian Mig29`s were in very poor condition. We both know that
As for the Iraqi that was not a fair fight either
stalingradComando 1 year ago
@stalingradComando
So what if Su-30MKI defeat the F-15 but can't if defeat F-15 in real shot down probably not. The Su-27 and Su-30MK variants spend to much time doing clown circus trick at less time Air Combat dog fighting. The Su-30MKI use Russian, Indian, Israeli, and French avionics. The truth is Su-30MKI with Russian avionics can't defeat F-15. Also the truth is Su-30MKI beat F-15 by cheating using multiple nation avionics instead using origin avionics.
USAAIRPOWER 1 year ago
@USAAIRPOWER
Who says that? You?
When you say that F15`s avionics are better,why should I and everybody who`s reading this believe you? Are you a pilot/engineer or maybe you have actual experience with military planes? Because if you`re not do not make comments like that again. Instead start reading some analysis written by well-known analysts or experts, like Carlo Copp for examples. Educate yourself. Start by reading some of the articles at ausairpower. net
stalingradComando 1 year ago
@stalingradComando
Su-30 was two crew while the F-15C was only one crew. The F-15E Strike Eagle could beat Su-30MKI Flankers. The F-15E is two crews. The F-15E Strike Eagle equipped with new AESA radar like APG-82 v 1 (APG-63 v 3 + APG-79), Sniper XR, LITENING AT, TIGER Eyes electro-optical sensor, AN/ALQ-135, AN/ALE-55, & using F100-PW-232. The f-15E able to carry AIM-9X Block 2 & AIM-120D. There is no doubt that F-15E would beat Su-30MKI easily.
USAAIRPOWER 1 year ago
@USAAIRPOWER Its ok. You can't change ignorant people over youtube.
thegamerman7 1 year ago
@stalingradComando " Actually the F117 is based in declassified Russian research "
I'd like you to prove it. And if you prove it with a website, then it has to be a legit one.
thegamerman7 1 year ago
@thegamerman7
The Idea of an aircraft with minimal signature on radar was a russsian one. Russia did a lot of research on stealth technology, but soon they discovered that stealth compromises the overall aerodynamic performance of an aircraft and gave up that idea. All the research was declassifed and published on a book, which was later discovered by the americans and some of the data it contained was later used on the F117
stalingradComando 1 year ago
@stalingradComando Ok but your not a Legit source so i still don't know if its true.
thegamerman7 1 year ago
Comment removed
stalingradComando 1 year ago
@stalingradComando Many Russians aircraft, especially bombers in cold war, were also copied or based on US aircraft or research
abc20776 1 year ago