I directed that movie. It's fake. Buzz and Neil are walking around living lies. We had actors. It was actually Tom Cruz and Bruce Willis on set. Every bit of knowledge that Neil and buzz have about what happened in 69 is just part of the script. Apollo 11-17 minus 13 = history. When 5 missions are successfully completed within 10 yrs why the hell do u stop? That's the question.
It was faked. Anybody who knows history remembers the Space War with the USSR and how they were ahead. What better way was there to beat them by faking a moon landing.
Why has no other Country tried going to the moon? As the USSR said it best. We dont have to try because we already know its IMPOSSIBLE
@tr4nc3d And anyone who knows science knows you're an idiot. We have physical proof. It No other country tried because it was so damn expensive. Why do you think the USA canceled 3 apollo missions? Its all about money.
@tr4nc3d "Anybody who knows history" Wow, that's rich. Guess what, nut job? There is absolutely NO WAY a conspiracy of such magnitude could survive 40+ years without atleast one insider spilling his guts. Let alone a few astronauts. I'm willing to bet there is very little in this life you ARE satisfied with. We went to THE MOON. Get over it.
NASA has already acknowledged the existence of "spires" on the moon, simply go to "google news archive search" and type in "eerie shapes on the moon". You can also do a search for "moon spires"
I love these fearless heroes. Only when you think about it, you realize how much they risked for all of us. We all could learn so much from them. They will always be remembered for their courage and life changing discoveries. Like Frank Scully would say: “Why not go out on a limb? Isn't that where the fruit is?”
@SidneyXda I feel anger and mistrust now that I know what they really found on the moon. Maybe Buzz and a couple of astronauts have mentioned the odd thing but there is heaps that's been covered up.
Bochum Observatory director (Professor Heinz Kaminski) was able to provide confirmation of events and data independent of both the Russian and US space agencies.
A compilation of sightings appeared in "Observations of Apollo 11", Sky and Telescope, November 1969, pp. 358-359.
The Madrid Apollo Station, part of the Deep Space Network, built in Fresnedillas, near Madrid, Spain tracked Apollo 11.
The Soviets monitored the missions at the Space Transmissions Corps, which was "fully equipped with the latest intelligence-gathering and surveillance equipment". Vasali Mishin
The missions were tracked by radar from several countries on the way to the Moon and back,France,Russia,Australia
Youtube: My comment to breakfastisready that starts out with, "Listen friend." was written AFTER the twelve year old comment. Why did you put them in the reverse order?
cutler1862;Hughes corp Geosynchronus TV satellite (First of its kind)also Early Bird,Intelsat3 Comsat via NASACOM network,Intersat3(USA) was first to give Indian Ocean area world TV access.
The only quarrel I have is why no one can produce a photograph showing physical evidence that we had 6 manned moon missions that left physical evidence, including at least one rover. Btw, how do you prove that a rock originated from "outer space" and not earth? So we "gave away" the moon rocks to other countries, right? That we spent billions of dollars to obtain, right? During the height of the Cold War, right? Hmmmm. A photo from earth would show the physical evidence.
damn there's no other way to say this - You are incredibly dumb!!!! :)
We didn't give them all away. We shared samples with the world. And they are ROCKS - not weapons. What does the cold war have to do with it? We docked with a russian craft during the cold war too.
How old are you - twelve?
And the rocks were tested and had materials that do not exist on this planet.
And as for that photo - you would claim it was fake too! And you know it. :)
No, I am not twelve. I am older than you and far more educated. Considerable support exists in scientific theory that the earth and the moon were once part of the same planet. I would be fascinated to know what minerals and metals are present in rocks from the moon. The moon may well be loaded with minerals and metals that are scarce on earth. NASA could easily show us a photograph if it exists. Or rig a telescope for the public to see. Twelve year olds do not demand physical evidence Adults do.
Listen friend. Is this the best you have? Hurling insults? You should be ashamed of yourself.Put up a telescope and show me the physical evidence. Are you telling me we don't have such a telescope? I have 96 credit hours from a major university and a doctoral degree in a highly technical specialty. And you hawk real estate and all you can do is insult and persecute those who ask honest questions and want physical proof. Look at the Apollo 11 news conference in 1969 and watch the charade.
Not a chance. Take a look at something on the moon (longer version) posted by ZacKak. He uses a simple 10" telescope and has awesome lunar surface video. You are a shill for sure. And you are no teacher. No teacher with any sense of professionalism would hurl insults and demean the search for truth and fact. I sure hope you don't have a Newton, Jefferson, Rosseau or a Locke in your classroom. You would ruin their lives and minds with your small mind. You're out of my face, friend.
No one would hurl insults on the internet? Wow, talk about uninitiated. The Zackak videos are no good, the resolution is too gross to be able to see something as small as the artifacts we left behind.
the moon is the earth you know? beacasue when the earth was still just a load of rcoks put together, another load of rocks the size of mars crashed into it. the rocks that fell of the earth gatherd up again and started to orbit the lager load of rocks( the earth). so realy the moon is a smaller earth but has less chance of life living on it.
- The rocks were distributed to several countries per an international agreement before we ever landed.
- They have been analyzed by those countries and found to have elements not know on earth. Among them a hydrogen element that has the potential to meet our energy needs using minute amounts when compared to standard fusion efforts. Hence our and other countries renewed interest in going back to the moon. Yes - BACK.
For some to make the Absurd comment that there was no moon landing,will result in a life time of ridicule, when America returns to the moon and reviews the equipment left behind from the original landings is displayed.
Starview: But where is the physical evidence of the moon landing? Why cannot someone produce telescopic photos of the tangible proof that shows that man walked on the moon? And how was Neil Armstrong filmed as he descended the LM? Where was the camera located that filmed him? How can such tremendously brilliant technical people like yourself be satisfied without the physical proof? No courtoom would admit the evidence we have of the moon landings. There is no foundation fo this "evidence."
And where pray tell are the moon rocks now? What is their chain of custody for the past decades? What peer reviewed scientific journals analyze them? How about a photo of the lunar rover? Satellites now orbit the earth and image smooth leather toes on combat boots. A few years ago we were warned about putting unexposed film through airport scannsers? Yet we have perfect photo images of astronauts on the moon? You have "faith" that we went to the moon. I want simple physical evidence.
cutler1862 camera mounted on leg of LM,very evident,a scan camera that was updated on later missions, you can see the location if one really does the work. No mystery at all.Physical evidence? Try any top university on the planet, they all have confirmed the extrordinary samples and their uniqueness to non earth origin. All those universities cannot be in on a hoax now can they? The landings, were real as advertised, brilliant technology for the time, and pure courage.
Starview1: So what kind of high speed data communications circuit in 1969 existed that allowed the broadcast in real time of "video" images from the moon as Neil Armstrong descended the LEM? And broadcast it all on network television? Film tootage from Vietnam was being flown out and developed in the US. Videotape cameras first appeared in the 1980s.
cutler1862;Hughes corp Geosynchronus TV satellite (First of its kind)also Early Bird,Intelsat3 Comsat via NASACOM network,Intersat3(USA) was first to give Indian Ocean area world TV access.
cutler1862 an further Recording and copy of telemetry was via Kinascope (Film CRT system) and NASA funded VTR video tape recorder 3/4 inch used to copy data imagery and provide copies, No mysttry at all, and that's how it worked at the time,almost all TV COM was USA inspired or created technology that resulted in todays VCR,Digital equipment. so there ya go...
cutler1862 Recording and copy of telemetry was via Kinascope (Film CRT system) and NASA funded VTR video tape recorder 3/4 inch used to copy data imagery and provide copies, No mystery at all, and that's how it worked at the time,almost all TV COM was USA inspired or created technology that resulted in todays VCR,Digital equipment. so there ya go...
on e more thing douchbags, buy a good telescope and youll see the flag, moon hoax LOL. I see the flag everynight ( cept for new moons and partial eclipses) how can you folks say stuff you know nothing about?
I spoke to Buzz a few months ago and he said " If i saw UFO's do you honestly think i would still keep this a secret? Im an American! I would never keep that from America" And i believe him, so go play some video games trekkies.
Apollo 11 was the first mission to land on the moon and many others followed.. I think we would have caught them after the second or third time... Take a deep breath and clear your mind of fungus and have a look at all the missions before posting a comment as weak as you did...
Go back to sleepy bye byes. Your comments are an insult to the bravery of these men and the dedication of everyone involved in this project. And STOP picking your nose, how many times do I have to tell you that!
you're quite an insignificant speck arent you Ronny??
The rock samples taken from the lunar surface since '69, solar radiation levels on the spacesuits, and further explorations and documentary after Apollo 11, give sychophants such as yourself reason to believe otherwise.
You saw the rocket leave the atmosphere didnt you? Whats it to you that they landed or not? You lose a bet or something? Are you always this bitter and angry everytime Man does something to advance itself from its primordial ways? According to you, penicillin doesnt work, air flight is a conspiracy, and underwater submersives is nothing but CGI. Get a life, better yet, do us all a favor and take your own, enough said, i'm out
I used to believe in the moon landings till i was told that i was no different than a religious fanatic, faith based beliefs. I then took a scientific approach to examining the moon landings and discovered much to my dismay that they are indeed an elaborate fraud. there is a really telling video with the 'astronauts' boogeing by the flag and the flag every so gently moving in the breeze created by the 'astronauts' passing.
i agree 50/50 with ron, us americans have no proof at all that we went to the moon,how can we believe them?thats just it,we cant,if we havent seen it with our eyes,we would look stupid saying "oh,of course they went to the moon!"...how do u know that for sure?
ya got no rebuttal,maybe we did go tot he moon, and mabe we didnt...
RonBaggerman Universities all over the planet reviewed the moon samples, and found them authentic,Much of todays tecnology is a direct translation from NASA early efforts. Circut minitureization in particular,teleComTV satellites,and more...
how comes he was the first man on the moon , but the camra taking his first steps was away from the craft so did it follow the ship or was it like a arm from the ship that was looking at him , i dunt understand please some one explain this to me , its realllllllllly doing me head in he he
Nixon must've payed a shitload to make that call
redsblackipod 2 months ago
haha, i love how he refers to firing the ascent engine as "somewhat critical" ... boss :)
MrLegoMan88 3 months ago
yea this narrator really gets on my nerves
MrLegoMan88 3 months ago
I directed that movie. It's fake. Buzz and Neil are walking around living lies. We had actors. It was actually Tom Cruz and Bruce Willis on set. Every bit of knowledge that Neil and buzz have about what happened in 69 is just part of the script. Apollo 11-17 minus 13 = history. When 5 missions are successfully completed within 10 yrs why the hell do u stop? That's the question.
TheA1l2e34x 4 months ago
@TheA1l2e34x stfu
jb13611 4 months ago in playlist More videos from joszovko
It was faked. Anybody who knows history remembers the Space War with the USSR and how they were ahead. What better way was there to beat them by faking a moon landing.
Why has no other Country tried going to the moon? As the USSR said it best. We dont have to try because we already know its IMPOSSIBLE
tr4nc3d 6 months ago
@tr4nc3d And anyone who knows science knows you're an idiot. We have physical proof. It No other country tried because it was so damn expensive. Why do you think the USA canceled 3 apollo missions? Its all about money.
YourDaddysBelt 5 months ago
@tr4nc3d "Anybody who knows history" Wow, that's rich. Guess what, nut job? There is absolutely NO WAY a conspiracy of such magnitude could survive 40+ years without atleast one insider spilling his guts. Let alone a few astronauts. I'm willing to bet there is very little in this life you ARE satisfied with. We went to THE MOON. Get over it.
TheAdultChild101 4 days ago
NASA has already acknowledged the existence of "spires" on the moon, simply go to "google news archive search" and type in "eerie shapes on the moon". You can also do a search for "moon spires"
QFT2 11 months ago
I love these fearless heroes. Only when you think about it, you realize how much they risked for all of us. We all could learn so much from them. They will always be remembered for their courage and life changing discoveries. Like Frank Scully would say: “Why not go out on a limb? Isn't that where the fruit is?”
TwistedMind6969 11 months ago
@Cliner98 no gravity? does that mean is easy to work out and get buff on the moon?
lotteein420 11 months ago
They surely agreed that since Neil goes first, he collects rocks and bumbles with instruments while BUzz gets to have fun!
TonyMarkov 1 year ago
President Nixon is my hero
1973mazdarx4coupe 1 year ago
google earth should be able to show us the american flag on the moon but there is none to show haha
mead005 1 year ago
@mead005 Yes there is
TimmyTimmyS 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
USA's greatest moment...proud to be a american!
neilzep 2 years ago
LOL why is he dancing around the moon starting at 3:14 like that? hahahahaha that looks so funny lol
scarysasquach 2 years ago
@scarysasquach dude it acc so funny that i keep wacthing it over and over!!!:L:L
:L:Lam laughing rite now while am writting this lol!!!!!
allanTUPAC 1 year ago
awesome!
milessydney 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I have watched film, and television for over 25 years, and to me, its obvious, the moon landings were filmed on a soundstage!
johncopey 3 years ago
always tears come down my eyes when i watch the part when neil says 'one samll step for man and giant leap for mankind '
SidneyXda 3 years ago 12
@SidneyXda I feel anger and mistrust now that I know what they really found on the moon. Maybe Buzz and a couple of astronauts have mentioned the odd thing but there is heaps that's been covered up.
felixq78 1 year ago
@felixq78 What did they find on the moon?
cheesemonkey4000 1 year ago
@SidneyXda ....
LordApocalypse7 9 months ago
@LordApocalypse7 ???
SidneyXda 9 months ago
Bochum Observatory director (Professor Heinz Kaminski) was able to provide confirmation of events and data independent of both the Russian and US space agencies.
A compilation of sightings appeared in "Observations of Apollo 11", Sky and Telescope, November 1969, pp. 358-359.
The Madrid Apollo Station, part of the Deep Space Network, built in Fresnedillas, near Madrid, Spain tracked Apollo 11.
starview1 3 years ago
The Soviets monitored the missions at the Space Transmissions Corps, which was "fully equipped with the latest intelligence-gathering and surveillance equipment". Vasali Mishin
The missions were tracked by radar from several countries on the way to the Moon and back,France,Russia,Australia
starview1 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
landing in the moon is fake
faraon2012 3 years ago
stop being stupid
goodsirknight 3 years ago
it could be fake.. id o think its fade, its whas a race with the rushians and they had to win it. nomather what and how ^^
YeahGotYouNow 3 years ago
Youtube: My comment to breakfastisready that starts out with, "Listen friend." was written AFTER the twelve year old comment. Why did you put them in the reverse order?
cutler1862 3 years ago
cutler1862;Hughes corp Geosynchronus TV satellite (First of its kind)also Early Bird,Intelsat3 Comsat via NASACOM network,Intersat3(USA) was first to give Indian Ocean area world TV access.
starview1 4 years ago
You can find over a hundred peer-reviewed papers of the moon flight and the materials we retrieved by simply googling peer reviewed moon flights.
One site from harvard has over a hundred papers about Apollo 11 published between 70 - 92.
Can't get the link to post. Must be a utube thing.
breakfastisready 4 years ago
The only quarrel I have is why no one can produce a photograph showing physical evidence that we had 6 manned moon missions that left physical evidence, including at least one rover. Btw, how do you prove that a rock originated from "outer space" and not earth? So we "gave away" the moon rocks to other countries, right? That we spent billions of dollars to obtain, right? During the height of the Cold War, right? Hmmmm. A photo from earth would show the physical evidence.
cutler1862 4 years ago
damn there's no other way to say this - You are incredibly dumb!!!! :)
We didn't give them all away. We shared samples with the world. And they are ROCKS - not weapons. What does the cold war have to do with it? We docked with a russian craft during the cold war too.
How old are you - twelve?
And the rocks were tested and had materials that do not exist on this planet.
And as for that photo - you would claim it was fake too! And you know it. :)
breakfastisready 4 years ago 2
No, I am not twelve. I am older than you and far more educated. Considerable support exists in scientific theory that the earth and the moon were once part of the same planet. I would be fascinated to know what minerals and metals are present in rocks from the moon. The moon may well be loaded with minerals and metals that are scarce on earth. NASA could easily show us a photograph if it exists. Or rig a telescope for the public to see. Twelve year olds do not demand physical evidence Adults do.
cutler1862 4 years ago
Twelve yr olds deny evidence, preferring to believe in the tooth fairy.
That's why I guessed your age to be about 12.
breakfastisready 4 years ago
Listen friend. Is this the best you have? Hurling insults? You should be ashamed of yourself.Put up a telescope and show me the physical evidence. Are you telling me we don't have such a telescope? I have 96 credit hours from a major university and a doctoral degree in a highly technical specialty. And you hawk real estate and all you can do is insult and persecute those who ask honest questions and want physical proof. Look at the Apollo 11 news conference in 1969 and watch the charade.
cutler1862 4 years ago
let's just agree to disagree.
take care
breakfastisready 4 years ago
Not a chance. Take a look at something on the moon (longer version) posted by ZacKak. He uses a simple 10" telescope and has awesome lunar surface video. You are a shill for sure. And you are no teacher. No teacher with any sense of professionalism would hurl insults and demean the search for truth and fact. I sure hope you don't have a Newton, Jefferson, Rosseau or a Locke in your classroom. You would ruin their lives and minds with your small mind. You're out of my face, friend.
cutler1862 4 years ago
No one would hurl insults on the internet? Wow, talk about uninitiated. The Zackak videos are no good, the resolution is too gross to be able to see something as small as the artifacts we left behind.
knightablaze 3 years ago
the moon is the earth you know? beacasue when the earth was still just a load of rcoks put together, another load of rocks the size of mars crashed into it. the rocks that fell of the earth gatherd up again and started to orbit the lager load of rocks( the earth). so realy the moon is a smaller earth but has less chance of life living on it.
hairypeebee 4 years ago
i couldnt have put it better myself :)
Johnsonss5 4 years ago
And btw - you didn't answer my question....
breakfastisready 4 years ago
- The rocks were distributed to several countries per an international agreement before we ever landed.
- They have been analyzed by those countries and found to have elements not know on earth. Among them a hydrogen element that has the potential to meet our energy needs using minute amounts when compared to standard fusion efforts. Hence our and other countries renewed interest in going back to the moon. Yes - BACK.
breakfastisready 4 years ago
if they did it secretly you would really have a field day.
they can't win either way in your mind.....
breakfastisready 4 years ago
For some to make the Absurd comment that there was no moon landing,will result in a life time of ridicule, when America returns to the moon and reviews the equipment left behind from the original landings is displayed.
starview1 4 years ago
true - but wingnuts like that don't care or know about reality.....
breakfastisready 4 years ago
breakfastisready love the term "wingnuts"lol
That really sums up some of the nutters out there, and I do mean out there!
starview1 4 years ago
Starview: But where is the physical evidence of the moon landing? Why cannot someone produce telescopic photos of the tangible proof that shows that man walked on the moon? And how was Neil Armstrong filmed as he descended the LM? Where was the camera located that filmed him? How can such tremendously brilliant technical people like yourself be satisfied without the physical proof? No courtoom would admit the evidence we have of the moon landings. There is no foundation fo this "evidence."
cutler1862 4 years ago
I'll take this one - though i can't believe it needs an answer....
Tangible evidence? two words - moon rocks.
Telescopic photos showing moon footprints? - you are kidding right?
The film of Armstrong's descent? - even then we could mount a camera practically anywhere on the LEM (not LM) !!
Here's my question to you - where and why did we fake (in your mind) the moon landing? And produce witnesses. A court needs evidence and motive.
Cased dismissed. We landed on the moon!
breakfastisready 4 years ago
And where pray tell are the moon rocks now? What is their chain of custody for the past decades? What peer reviewed scientific journals analyze them? How about a photo of the lunar rover? Satellites now orbit the earth and image smooth leather toes on combat boots. A few years ago we were warned about putting unexposed film through airport scannsers? Yet we have perfect photo images of astronauts on the moon? You have "faith" that we went to the moon. I want simple physical evidence.
cutler1862 4 years ago
cutler1862 camera mounted on leg of LM,very evident,a scan camera that was updated on later missions, you can see the location if one really does the work. No mystery at all.Physical evidence? Try any top university on the planet, they all have confirmed the extrordinary samples and their uniqueness to non earth origin. All those universities cannot be in on a hoax now can they? The landings, were real as advertised, brilliant technology for the time, and pure courage.
starview1 4 years ago
Starview1: So what kind of high speed data communications circuit in 1969 existed that allowed the broadcast in real time of "video" images from the moon as Neil Armstrong descended the LEM? And broadcast it all on network television? Film tootage from Vietnam was being flown out and developed in the US. Videotape cameras first appeared in the 1980s.
cutler1862 4 years ago
cutler1862;Hughes corp Geosynchronus TV satellite (First of its kind)also Early Bird,Intelsat3 Comsat via NASACOM network,Intersat3(USA) was first to give Indian Ocean area world TV access.
starview1 4 years ago
cutler1862 an further Recording and copy of telemetry was via Kinascope (Film CRT system) and NASA funded VTR video tape recorder 3/4 inch used to copy data imagery and provide copies, No mysttry at all, and that's how it worked at the time,almost all TV COM was USA inspired or created technology that resulted in todays VCR,Digital equipment. so there ya go...
starview1 4 years ago
cutler1862 Recording and copy of telemetry was via Kinascope (Film CRT system) and NASA funded VTR video tape recorder 3/4 inch used to copy data imagery and provide copies, No mystery at all, and that's how it worked at the time,almost all TV COM was USA inspired or created technology that resulted in todays VCR,Digital equipment. so there ya go...
starview1 4 years ago
on e more thing douchbags, buy a good telescope and youll see the flag, moon hoax LOL. I see the flag everynight ( cept for new moons and partial eclipses) how can you folks say stuff you know nothing about?
babaloz 4 years ago
I spoke to Buzz a few months ago and he said " If i saw UFO's do you honestly think i would still keep this a secret? Im an American! I would never keep that from America" And i believe him, so go play some video games trekkies.
babaloz 4 years ago
Ron
Apollo 11 was the first mission to land on the moon and many others followed.. I think we would have caught them after the second or third time... Take a deep breath and clear your mind of fungus and have a look at all the missions before posting a comment as weak as you did...
ndgrules 4 years ago
can't see the stars......no man ever was on the moon...the moon landing is a hoax in which the nasa cashed in! do some research...google "moon hoax"
RonBaggerman 4 years ago
Go back to sleepy bye byes. Your comments are an insult to the bravery of these men and the dedication of everyone involved in this project. And STOP picking your nose, how many times do I have to tell you that!
xeasternxz 4 years ago 3
you're quite an insignificant speck arent you Ronny??
The rock samples taken from the lunar surface since '69, solar radiation levels on the spacesuits, and further explorations and documentary after Apollo 11, give sychophants such as yourself reason to believe otherwise.
But hey, we all have critics
mkxylplk 4 years ago 2
RonBag, you're a duschebagged dumbfuck!!
You saw the rocket leave the atmosphere didnt you? Whats it to you that they landed or not? You lose a bet or something? Are you always this bitter and angry everytime Man does something to advance itself from its primordial ways? According to you, penicillin doesnt work, air flight is a conspiracy, and underwater submersives is nothing but CGI. Get a life, better yet, do us all a favor and take your own, enough said, i'm out
PlanetOfTheNBApes 4 years ago
I used to believe in the moon landings till i was told that i was no different than a religious fanatic, faith based beliefs. I then took a scientific approach to examining the moon landings and discovered much to my dismay that they are indeed an elaborate fraud. there is a really telling video with the 'astronauts' boogeing by the flag and the flag every so gently moving in the breeze created by the 'astronauts' passing.
Gromitdog1 4 years ago
i agree 50/50 with ron, us americans have no proof at all that we went to the moon,how can we believe them?thats just it,we cant,if we havent seen it with our eyes,we would look stupid saying "oh,of course they went to the moon!"...how do u know that for sure?
ya got no rebuttal,maybe we did go tot he moon, and mabe we didnt...
killingsasukeisfun 4 years ago
RonBaggerman Universities all over the planet reviewed the moon samples, and found them authentic,Much of todays tecnology is a direct translation from NASA early efforts. Circut minitureization in particular,teleComTV satellites,and more...
starview1 4 years ago
UFO's Where????
breakfastisready 4 years ago
yep... i was wondering too??
wers the ufo?
somanathasharma 4 years ago
Are you that dense? The camera is a remote mounted on the exterior of the lunar module (craft). Also, you should learn to type and spell.
clndck2 4 years ago 2
how comes he was the first man on the moon , but the camra taking his first steps was away from the craft so did it follow the ship or was it like a arm from the ship that was looking at him , i dunt understand please some one explain this to me , its realllllllllly doing me head in he he
RaelSpice 4 years ago
the guy stepping out was aldrin who was being filmed by armstrong(first man on the moon)
joop1977 4 years ago
Not a bad Doc though!!
iguire 4 years ago
Where are the UFO's?
iguire 4 years ago