Short, but still a good interview. "War is a Lie" definitely seems to be a book that everyone should read, and maybe it, along with "War is a Racket", which was authored by former USMC Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler, should eventually become the most read texts in human history.
Germany (and Italy) first declared war on the US - as declared in the US Joint Resolution of December 12. The attack on Pearl Harbor only justified a declaration of war against Japan and it was NOT used by the US as an 'excuse' for the war in Europe.
@StDekker correct... Hitler first declared war on the US, after the US declared war on Germany's explicit military ally: Japan.
The US knew that a declaration against Japan would cause Germany to automatically declare on the US. So the US gets to say for 70 years "hey, they started it", when in reality... we all collectively started it
I confess I have not read this book but will because I think this way too. However to question WW2 as unjust needs some analysis. When Nazi Germany was bombing London and other areas of the UK that was pretty aggressive.
It seems like each side blames the other for the onset : War was launched against China after the Marco Polo Bridge Incident of July 7, 1937, in which an allegedly unplanned clash took place near Beiping (as Beijing was then called) between Chinese and Japanese troops and quickly escalated into full-scale warfare. The Second Sino-Japanese War (1937-45) ensued"
In any case, calling someone a liar because of semantics is really lame. What about this offends you?
Walt Disney's logo is"Capturing your imagination" America was founded on MASONIC FREEMASONRY or CABALA . Freemasonry is the founding of "America" Freemasons sought "A"merca or the western star
This means the Western Star Venus. Venus is the Red White & Blue star. The statute of LIBERTY is Their LIGHT BEARER COLUMBIA is their Goddess.Your Capital Building's are TEMPLES with each having a CORNER STONE from the FREEMASONS. They ORDAIN their CRAFT with WINE CORN & OIL. Vigilantcitizen or freemantv
i am definitely going to buy his book i have said for years that we never have fought a justified war for the most part we send our lower classes to fight wars that only benefit the rich and ruling class of our country it is obscene
A very small minority of people who have owned land for centuries are the ones who benefit from war. In England less than 1% of the population owns over 60% of the land and they collect their rent from the businesses and public services that use their land. Farm subsidies indirectly bolster their estates. When a citizen volunteers to go to war to fight for his country he is fighting primarily for the preservation of a centralised political system that keeps this secret wealth hidden from
@nomis101uk There is no definitive statistical work that can provide us with a clear understanding of the incestuous relationship between ancient inheritors of vast estates and the fiscal administrative systems that have evolved over time. There exists in the UK a cultural strata that owes its existence to the maintenance of secrets, the secret of a lucrative rentier economy lining the pockets of old families at public expense. Obfuscated by The Land Registry the statstics can be gleaned from..
Parliamentary scrutiny, partly because Parliament is run by civil servants who serve the elite. Were this not the case the Land Registry would make available to the public a complete account of who owns what and how much they collect in rent each year. A soldier is fighting for a place called 'country' but the place he owns is nothing compared to what the Lords and Ladies own. If the 'country' is threatened with invasion the greatest threat is to the few who own most of the country's assets
and it is mostly they who, by occupying very senior government, banking and military posts as a result of their selective private education, are most likely to have inside knowledge about which of their major holdings (home and abroad) may be affected. If an invader takes over our land, it will not mean the citizen will lose his tiny little holding, his house or flat, but it will mean a much greater loss to those whose possessions consist of art and antique and other very expensive collections,
huge estates, huge holdings in the industrial and banking sector of global economy and properties throughout the world. It is these 'treasures' that invaders want - not your pokey little 3 bed semi.
Leaders who committed the UK to both World Wars were not in the least interested in the welfare of the working classes whom they sent to die in their millions - but they were most certainly interested in serving their masters - the big industrial and money cartels, big land and property owners.
A lot of this dovetails into the doctrine of "American. Exceptionalism" I would suggest along those lines a book "Meeting the Enemy: American Exceptionalism International Law" by Natsu Saito. Also, on youtube, search for "the end of American Exceptionalism" for some additional good segments on the same subject. There's a very good interview with Prof. Saito at Law and Disorder, a radio show, Center for Constitutional Rights.
If Britain would have never started WW 2 I think every country on this planet would have been a lot better off than it is today.
Think about it, Britain would still have its Empire, U.S would have kept all its traditions and standards, Germany would have been the heart of Europe, Russians could have fought back thier Soviet Leaders with the aid of Germany, France, Italy. The middle east would be just fine and Israel Jews would be living in harmony with the Palestinian.
BS. All statements of the form "the master class has always decided _____" are false, given that this is neither the pattern exhibited by history, nor consistent with human nature and social organization.
War is NATURAL, it does not require "lies", and is very rarely the result of any "master class" deciding ANYTHING. The desire to hold and maintain territory is the first and foremost element in conflict between societies. The desire to sort people into in- and out-groups does the rest.
@byff69 I'd have to agree , we are greedy by nature and our level of greed works in sync with our level of power in many ways . As it is near impossible for us not to take our lives for granted , as one has 'something' one becomes accustomed to that 'something' and therefore that 'something' loses it's meaning or value because we acclimatize . I do not understand the human brain enough to make an exact comment on this though i believe this mechanism has something to do with survival-
@byff69 -Think about it , even at our own small level we want the very extent of what we can afford , times this rational a million times over .Though mind you this rational can be overcome with discipline , consideration for others and forethought .Forethought as in , yes these elite want global domination at all costs ...the way i see it , i'd rather have less power and live in a world that consisted of organized intellectual citizens co-existing than a a leader of a world that is in chaos .
@byff69 Though i suppose the "lies" aspect of these wars is about "selling" the wars to the masses , and misinforming them thus making it easier to justify therefore making it easier to lay waste in another territory without having to battle for support from their own people .Plus at a certain level humans always seem to hold bias as in where they are from always has to be better than where others are from .This deep seed stems from fear of the unknown , and this hate mongering fuels their-
@byff69 patriotic undertone .I am not a racist though at some level when i see a colored person , it still triggers a response to my brain "hang on that person is different" we all have this response , only difference is i understand that i do have this response and have educated myself as to reasons why i should not dislike or hate someone that has a different skin color . Though i see racism amongst my friends , even at small levels .Small in terms of power hence the small racist undertones-
@byff69 which takes me back to my previous point that our hatred/greed etc tends to fall in line with our position in the world . From small people on the streets saying "those guys are idiots ,they are so dumb" to " lets wipe this nation off the map and do what we want with the baron desolate territory" ... greed consumes us all . If anyone where to ask me if i am indeed greedy and think of myself first , i'd say yes i do ... to a certain extent .Most people live in an uneducated denial ...
Paul: why not a review of "War Is A Racket" by Major General Smedley Butler. We don't need yet another book on war. General Butler's book is definitive.
Interestingly the then Pres.Hoover was right in thinking that sanctions against japen for its aggression may lead to war with it (in 1931) . But morally and legally Roosevelt was right o cut oil to Japan.
Whatever his motives, like shops every nation has a right to "refuse service to anyone". Japan attacking the US for cutting oil is about as moral as the US attacking Canada if it were to do the same thing.
@Vebinz He wasn't saying the Japan attacking the USA was moral... But that doesn't make the US deliberately provoking an attack so that it could wage an all-out war moral either; nor does it make deception of the public concerning these events moral.
Well, I don't know if we can look inside FDR's mind to see what he was thinking, but given Japanese actions at the time it is understandable to cut oil to them, and there were others wanting such actiosn even before FDR, going back to Hoover and 1931 (Hoover refused to do anything about it, but FDR eventualyl decided not to sell Japan things it can use like oil).
As I wrote, nations have a moral and legal right to deal or not deal with anyone they want.
@Vebinz I don't know if we can "look inside FDR's mind" either (actually, I'm sure we can't). But maybe you don't need to. Swanson was saying - and other historians, as Jay says, have argued the same - that there is more than enough evidence to to reasonably conclude that the Pearl Harbour attack was deliberated provoked and anticipated as part of a overall military strategy...
@euclidxxx [continued] To examine whether the evidence in question is valid (I don't know) you would have to read the books of Swanson and others - but it's silly to prejudge FDR as innocent of deliberate provocation (which, by the way, would amount effectively to a kind of treason...) on the weak plea the you can't read his mind. Apart from this: if the argument for attacking Japan were really so reasonable, as you suggest, then why resort to public deception...?
Suppose I was a store owner who decided not to sell to some known neighbourhood criminal thug. Okay you can say it is provoking his anger, butlegally and morally it is my right.
A bit ago it was revealed that the US had plans to invade Saudi Arabian oil fields if there was an oil crises. Well such an attack would be as illegal and immoral as the Japaneseattack.
America had a secret treaty with Japan. Teddy Roosevelt expressed Americas desire for Japan to invade Korea. He wanted Japan to be a proxy for America. That China was a race in decline and Japan was a rising race and westernized.
T. Roosevelt literally negotiated for those actions you claim warranted sanction.
Also
If American elites hadn't of pushed eugenics in Germany would there of been a holocaust?
I have not read that book, but even if true, that still neither justifies Japanese aggression against China in the 1930's, nor their attack on Pearl Harbor after FDR decided to cut oil to them over these aggression (regardless of his ulterior motives).
I agree to all of this, with one exception. The leader of the Taliban (Someone completly else then Osama) was prepared to give up Osama Bin Laden if he actually had something to do with the things USA said he has done, he called for several meetings with him and asked him if he had something to do with it, and everytime he simply said. They are lying.
There is a song that I would like to dedicate to this book its called Masters of War. Youtube it and enjoy! Thanks I will read the grand chess board because the great satan lays bare there.
YEs......you have to motivate People with LIES.......
"Yes, David you can slay Goliath"....
I think Swanson is way off on defending Europe during WWII.
Korea and Vietnam were stupid Wars (but we didn't know that back then, that Communism would fail on its own)..
The Middle East Wars...?????.......?????......?????..... yeah, they suck....and we could be living in a World were Saddam was still ruling Iraq and 9/11 never happened (dreams, dreams, dreams).
If you take a look at the world from space, you will realize there are no borders carved out. National boundaries are and always have been arbitrary lines, drawn by violence, and used by the ruling national elites to oppress, divide, and control the ordinary people of the world. Do we human beings have to accept the dominant global order, and the mass injustices, oppression, exploitation, and violence that are characteristic of it?
I think genuine Democracy would be a much better idea......
We have two choices in this critical moment in human history; either we accept a society based on functioning democracy, where the general population can exercise direct control on political and economic institutions, or we continue on in a world based on autocracy.
Continued military conflict, war, and violence is an inherent symptom of the global capitalist system. This system has always been based on coercion, rather than freedom.
Until those who control the state, hold power and wealth in a society, i.e the ruling elite, continue to be the dominant force in shaping policy, then the plague of military conflict will continue to destroy humanity.
"If, in the eyes of the almighty higher consciousness, all men and women are created equal, then all can become doctors-- so then, who will carry our golf bags on Wednesdays?"
...and why did the US go to war with Nazi Germany except that they played the capitalism game better than the US did (which is why it was admired among those who deem themselves the ruling class)? The Nazis wanted to rule the world, the US feels that's the job of the US elite, using the US military as the enforcer, the duped US taxpayer funds to pay for the trillions they BORROW, with us as the perennial debtors!
Of course they had to lie, can you imagine Bush at a Press conf. saying ``Hey guys let's loot the middle east`` or in WW2 ``Now that we made a fortune by selling wepons to both sides, we should enter that shit, beat the losing side and take all the credits`` or `` lets try our new toy on the Japs and see how it goes``
Also Dont forget the original from the 30s by Smedley Butler "War is a Racket", its available for free on the internet and its quite short. Also worth reading 2 pages (14-15, or 15-16) from operation Northwoods (1962) by the JCoS showing the extent the top military were willing to go; false flags, remote controlled planes, etc. and that false flag are designed to fool most of the military, gov, media as well as the public.
The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles. The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject class has had nothing to gain and all to lose — especially their lives.
Nothing is more profitable for international bankers than war. If you ever want to know any reason for war.....follow the money trail. It's always about the cash.
War is what old men do to younger generations without real guidance. War is what fathers encourage kids to participate in for the long term benefits. War is what skews the less enlightened down a road of brotherly ignorance. War is what promotes pride and self righteousness. War is what portrays duty under these conditions as admirable.
Unfortunately Westerners have been engaged in false wars since 1492. Wars have been sold to the populations as missions of evangelization, civilization, and now democracy. To rid the world of "barbarity" . However, the elites have always been able to gain control over populations and resources throughout history.
This video needs to go viral. As the video was just about to end, I was typing a comment saying "people should also check out Zbigniew Brzezinski's book 'the Grand Chessboard' to better understand the USA's current foreign (war) policy" but Paul Jay did it. BTW, the book IS available free online if you prefer to NOT line that jackass Brzezinski's pockets. Check out Scribd, I believe it's on there.
@ToeInspector That is not what I meant. I am asking how is the American revolution not necessary? The British were opressing us I don't see how that could have been dealt with peacefully. I am anti-war but I still don't see how the orginal American settlelers could have gotten rid of British Opression peacefully
@captcrais101 Why was it necessary ? so you serve the Elites who OWN America rather than the Queen.Whats the difference ? If I am a Slave, and I am sold to a new "Master" does that make me a free man ?
@ToeInspector his original question was legitimate. Remember that you once knew little too. Educate kindly. Save harsh words for the real aholes. The theorists are in-fighting too much. Try sharing ideas. If you are a true theorist, you'll know that this kind of communication is misleading
@captcrais101 "how was the revolutionary war a lie?" Because the rich white land owners, Washington and Jefferson, used to colonialists to fight against the British so that they could be in charge.
@delreydavid The British had collapsed the smuggling trade and those smugglers payed bribes.... an interesting factor. Something like 99% of some goods were smuggled into America to avoid a duty of six-pence. "The right of Parliament to charge foreign molasses with a duty of six-pence was unquestionable; but for Parliament to reduce the six-pence to three-pence is a violent usurpation of unconstitutional authority." - William Knox
@abram730 A bunch of corrupt criminals got pissed and started pamphleteering in an attempt to do in the colonies what was done in France. It didn't work so they instigated the situation from Briton. The stamp act did spark, as did instigating a monetary collapse in the colonies.
@407buddy Oh, yes! To our old hicks he was especially. But that is where homo spaien's humor comes from Ironic truth contained in a joke. We had a lot of honest people back then. ;)
Excellent and the author was right in each of his comments about the lies used for the purpose of pushing war on the American people, and could have added that F.D.R. Secretary of the Navy in ww1 along with Churchill from England allowed the Lusitania to be attacked and sunk for the purpose of it igniting one of Americas response for entry into the war to end all wars
japanese were afraid of starting a land war on the US if they won the Pacific because they knew how may guns the American populace owned...War is a racket
Time Banks would remove the overbearing use of debt-currency and thereby reduce the power the mongers have over the world. Make money pointless and the lubrication to motivate people disappears.
I'm the kind of guy who believes that American politicians aren't evil, but rather naturally flawed people who (for the most part) do what they think is right and in the best interests of the country. I believe that Bush went into Iraq because he believed it was the right thing to do; because he believed that the intelligence he had at hand was accurate. This does not mean that these people are always right and that there are no lies. But that's a far cry from this man's (Swanson) extremism.
@chapaev36 You are naive and from your reply do not the first thing about world politics, Disney was made for people like you, stick to that it is more to your liking and stay away from geo-politics for now
So this guy says that the US government lies all the time, he has exposed many false flags in his books but he still believes in the official story of 9/11 (aka The official Fairy Tale of 9/11)?
9/11 was orchestrated by Israel and Neocon Zionists in Bush's circle, if you want to end the wars based on lies then EXPOSE 9/11.
Perhaps the greatest piece of pro-war propaganda ever made was the philosophical view that human beings are naturally warlike. But if that were true, no government would have to engage in lies or propaganda to get its people to kill other people. Even in 1914 when millions of volunteers for the armed forces seemed to come out of nowhere, it was because of decades of propaganda. Human beings cannot kill other human beings, only people who have been demonized.
"I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in." - General Smedley
"I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903." - General Smedley
"In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents." - General Smedley
"War is a racket. It always has been. It is the oldest, most profitable and surely the most vicious. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small 'inside' group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes." - US General Smedley
No. When you weigh those conquered resources against the mind-bogglingly enormous costs of waging a modern war, you find that it is a huge loss. It does, however, provide a really good excuse for spending tax money.
Think of it as less of a land grab, where the money is taken from the victims, and more of a money laundering scheme - a quasi-legitimacized reason for the US national state to take a lot of money from a lot people in the US, and give it to some other people in the US.
I talk to a lot of people abut these perpetual wars the U.S. has started. I swear the people have been drinking the Kool-Aid (propaganda) the U.S. had been putting out there for so long they don't know anything. Too bad the draft is going on right now because if it was, there just wouldn't be any of these senseless wars. Look up Eisherhower's Farewell Speech about the Military Industrial Complex and you will understand what is going on.
Most people know the wars are based on lies. They pretend it is truth to salve their conscience.
Also America has been spared the destruction that many other nations and continents befell during the last century. Not having the collective memory of the tragedy, despair and horror, the true face of war, makes it easier to keep glorifying anything military.
Its really amazing. The US is one of the most militaristic nations of all time yet has a self image of being peace loving.
@Northern5tar i know right its wierd how ever nation ever has done something like this in one way or another, hypocrasy is human fucking nature but becuase of our need to be selfish and greed, and add the internet how all everyones personal info is going public, which is how it should be.
All Americans must read James Douglass's book "JFK and the UNSPEAKABLE: Why He Died and Why It Matters" to fully understand the reason that war and nuclear proliferation continues unabated...50 years ago, in JFK's day, and now in our present time. And 50 years before JFK, at the end of WWI, General Smedley Butler said "War is a racket that profits the few at the expense of the many." How and when will we ever stop this insanity? If we do not, we will all perish.
@WavesOfTrolls Nope....nothing wrong with the title. It must be you who is stupid. Put the cap back on the glue and you'll feel better in a day or two.
The German General Staff sent two officers in March of 1939 to beg surrender terms. They even offered to arrest Hitler. They were denied all peace offers. 58,000,000 people died after the German military and the Japanese Emperor had both offered to surrender.
The US entered WW I to bankrupt our allies and make New York the world financial capitol. They also wanted to set up a Zio-Communist government in Russia and a Jewish colony in Palestine.
Short, but still a good interview. "War is a Lie" definitely seems to be a book that everyone should read, and maybe it, along with "War is a Racket", which was authored by former USMC Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler, should eventually become the most read texts in human history.
mikecorbeil 2 months ago
I transferred all the cash I could.
See my channel for the trailer and the link is in it’s description.
Watch “How To Rob A Bank” at UmotionS.com
DedmanUmotionS 3 months ago
A world without war is a hope we must never abandon.
axelgrz 4 months ago
Aside from American history, what other aspect of military history is a lie?
ebtricks 5 months ago
did he just question the AMERICAN HOLY WAR!?!?!? SHOCKING. WW2 was perfect right? that's what everyone learns in school... now my soul hurts
Craigipedia 6 months ago
Germany (and Italy) first declared war on the US - as declared in the US Joint Resolution of December 12. The attack on Pearl Harbor only justified a declaration of war against Japan and it was NOT used by the US as an 'excuse' for the war in Europe.
StDekker 7 months ago
@StDekker correct... Hitler first declared war on the US, after the US declared war on Germany's explicit military ally: Japan.
The US knew that a declaration against Japan would cause Germany to automatically declare on the US. So the US gets to say for 70 years "hey, they started it", when in reality... we all collectively started it
Craigipedia 6 months ago
I confess I have not read this book but will because I think this way too. However to question WW2 as unjust needs some analysis. When Nazi Germany was bombing London and other areas of the UK that was pretty aggressive.
litesp33d 7 months ago
8:44
Neocunts?
pigeontoucher 11 months ago
Comment removed
rafyselles 11 months ago
The Iraq war was definitely based on a lie (weapons of mass destruction). Thousand of people died because Bush lied.
Caligirlvanessa 1 year ago 3
This guy is a liar himself, he refers to the Japanese invasion of China as "China's war with Japan" making it sound like Japan was the victim.
Crimble67 1 year ago
@Crimble67
It seems like each side blames the other for the onset : War was launched against China after the Marco Polo Bridge Incident of July 7, 1937, in which an allegedly unplanned clash took place near Beiping (as Beijing was then called) between Chinese and Japanese troops and quickly escalated into full-scale warfare. The Second Sino-Japanese War (1937-45) ensued"
In any case, calling someone a liar because of semantics is really lame. What about this offends you?
madebutante 1 year ago
Walt Disney's logo is"Capturing your imagination" America was founded on MASONIC FREEMASONRY or CABALA . Freemasonry is the founding of "America" Freemasons sought "A"merca or the western star
This means the Western Star Venus. Venus is the Red White & Blue star. The statute of LIBERTY is Their LIGHT BEARER COLUMBIA is their Goddess.Your Capital Building's are TEMPLES with each having a CORNER STONE from the FREEMASONS. They ORDAIN their CRAFT with WINE CORN & OIL. Vigilantcitizen or freemantv
WarDogLRS 1 year ago
i am definitely going to buy his book i have said for years that we never have fought a justified war for the most part we send our lower classes to fight wars that only benefit the rich and ruling class of our country it is obscene
dragonflychainsaw 1 year ago
A very small minority of people who have owned land for centuries are the ones who benefit from war. In England less than 1% of the population owns over 60% of the land and they collect their rent from the businesses and public services that use their land. Farm subsidies indirectly bolster their estates. When a citizen volunteers to go to war to fight for his country he is fighting primarily for the preservation of a centralised political system that keeps this secret wealth hidden from
christvbible 1 year ago 15
@christvbible Where did you get that statistic from out of interest?
nomis101uk 1 year ago
@nomis101uk There is no definitive statistical work that can provide us with a clear understanding of the incestuous relationship between ancient inheritors of vast estates and the fiscal administrative systems that have evolved over time. There exists in the UK a cultural strata that owes its existence to the maintenance of secrets, the secret of a lucrative rentier economy lining the pockets of old families at public expense. Obfuscated by The Land Registry the statstics can be gleaned from..
christvbible 1 year ago
Parliamentary scrutiny, partly because Parliament is run by civil servants who serve the elite. Were this not the case the Land Registry would make available to the public a complete account of who owns what and how much they collect in rent each year. A soldier is fighting for a place called 'country' but the place he owns is nothing compared to what the Lords and Ladies own. If the 'country' is threatened with invasion the greatest threat is to the few who own most of the country's assets
christvbible 1 year ago 7
and it is mostly they who, by occupying very senior government, banking and military posts as a result of their selective private education, are most likely to have inside knowledge about which of their major holdings (home and abroad) may be affected. If an invader takes over our land, it will not mean the citizen will lose his tiny little holding, his house or flat, but it will mean a much greater loss to those whose possessions consist of art and antique and other very expensive collections,
christvbible 1 year ago 2
huge estates, huge holdings in the industrial and banking sector of global economy and properties throughout the world. It is these 'treasures' that invaders want - not your pokey little 3 bed semi.
Leaders who committed the UK to both World Wars were not in the least interested in the welfare of the working classes whom they sent to die in their millions - but they were most certainly interested in serving their masters - the big industrial and money cartels, big land and property owners.
christvbible 1 year ago 4
Paul Jay should be neutral.
shafaq007 1 year ago
If something is not good they have to lie to convince the masses....
Its like selling burgers as something healthy... no difference.
underyourskindvd 1 year ago
Cuba didn't take Jews either. Lots of countries didn't take refugees.
lordblazer 1 year ago
A lot of this dovetails into the doctrine of "American. Exceptionalism" I would suggest along those lines a book "Meeting the Enemy: American Exceptionalism International Law" by Natsu Saito. Also, on youtube, search for "the end of American Exceptionalism" for some additional good segments on the same subject. There's a very good interview with Prof. Saito at Law and Disorder, a radio show, Center for Constitutional Rights.
Aiden057 1 year ago
good point. all through the "cold war" we were selling food to russia.
Rico8458 1 year ago
Can I thumbs up this video twice?
oolong2 1 year ago
this was a really good one
lobohaybusa 1 year ago
If Britain would have never started WW 2 I think every country on this planet would have been a lot better off than it is today.
Think about it, Britain would still have its Empire, U.S would have kept all its traditions and standards, Germany would have been the heart of Europe, Russians could have fought back thier Soviet Leaders with the aid of Germany, France, Italy. The middle east would be just fine and Israel Jews would be living in harmony with the Palestinian.
Danny022479 1 year ago
BS. All statements of the form "the master class has always decided _____" are false, given that this is neither the pattern exhibited by history, nor consistent with human nature and social organization.
War is NATURAL, it does not require "lies", and is very rarely the result of any "master class" deciding ANYTHING. The desire to hold and maintain territory is the first and foremost element in conflict between societies. The desire to sort people into in- and out-groups does the rest.
byff69 1 year ago
@byff69 I'd have to agree , we are greedy by nature and our level of greed works in sync with our level of power in many ways . As it is near impossible for us not to take our lives for granted , as one has 'something' one becomes accustomed to that 'something' and therefore that 'something' loses it's meaning or value because we acclimatize . I do not understand the human brain enough to make an exact comment on this though i believe this mechanism has something to do with survival-
morsel101 1 year ago
@byff69 -Think about it , even at our own small level we want the very extent of what we can afford , times this rational a million times over .Though mind you this rational can be overcome with discipline , consideration for others and forethought .Forethought as in , yes these elite want global domination at all costs ...the way i see it , i'd rather have less power and live in a world that consisted of organized intellectual citizens co-existing than a a leader of a world that is in chaos .
morsel101 1 year ago
@byff69 Though i suppose the "lies" aspect of these wars is about "selling" the wars to the masses , and misinforming them thus making it easier to justify therefore making it easier to lay waste in another territory without having to battle for support from their own people .Plus at a certain level humans always seem to hold bias as in where they are from always has to be better than where others are from .This deep seed stems from fear of the unknown , and this hate mongering fuels their-
morsel101 1 year ago
@byff69 patriotic undertone .I am not a racist though at some level when i see a colored person , it still triggers a response to my brain "hang on that person is different" we all have this response , only difference is i understand that i do have this response and have educated myself as to reasons why i should not dislike or hate someone that has a different skin color . Though i see racism amongst my friends , even at small levels .Small in terms of power hence the small racist undertones-
morsel101 1 year ago
@byff69 which takes me back to my previous point that our hatred/greed etc tends to fall in line with our position in the world . From small people on the streets saying "those guys are idiots ,they are so dumb" to " lets wipe this nation off the map and do what we want with the baron desolate territory" ... greed consumes us all . If anyone where to ask me if i am indeed greedy and think of myself first , i'd say yes i do ... to a certain extent .Most people live in an uneducated denial ...
morsel101 1 year ago
Paul: why not a review of "War Is A Racket" by Major General Smedley Butler. We don't need yet another book on war. General Butler's book is definitive.
AJsOwner 1 year ago
Excellent !!
martinaoe2 1 year ago
instead of paying for this book, simply pull out your old copy of george orwell's 1984... it's all explained in that book...
CrackerJackLee 1 year ago
@407buddy
,mmmmm pizza hut
YoungSpotUBrock 1 year ago
I disagree with Swanson's viewson WWII.
Interestingly the then Pres.Hoover was right in thinking that sanctions against japen for its aggression may lead to war with it (in 1931) . But morally and legally Roosevelt was right o cut oil to Japan.
Whatever his motives, like shops every nation has a right to "refuse service to anyone". Japan attacking the US for cutting oil is about as moral as the US attacking Canada if it were to do the same thing.
Vebinz 1 year ago
@Vebinz He wasn't saying the Japan attacking the USA was moral... But that doesn't make the US deliberately provoking an attack so that it could wage an all-out war moral either; nor does it make deception of the public concerning these events moral.
euclidxxx 1 year ago
@euclidxxx Also, it's worth remembering that Japan's "attack on the US" was on a hostile militarily base in the Pacific...
euclidxxx 1 year ago
@euclidxxx
Well, I don't know if we can look inside FDR's mind to see what he was thinking, but given Japanese actions at the time it is understandable to cut oil to them, and there were others wanting such actiosn even before FDR, going back to Hoover and 1931 (Hoover refused to do anything about it, but FDR eventualyl decided not to sell Japan things it can use like oil).
As I wrote, nations have a moral and legal right to deal or not deal with anyone they want.
Vebinz 1 year ago
@Vebinz I don't know if we can "look inside FDR's mind" either (actually, I'm sure we can't). But maybe you don't need to. Swanson was saying - and other historians, as Jay says, have argued the same - that there is more than enough evidence to to reasonably conclude that the Pearl Harbour attack was deliberated provoked and anticipated as part of a overall military strategy...
euclidxxx 1 year ago
@euclidxxx [continued] To examine whether the evidence in question is valid (I don't know) you would have to read the books of Swanson and others - but it's silly to prejudge FDR as innocent of deliberate provocation (which, by the way, would amount effectively to a kind of treason...) on the weak plea the you can't read his mind. Apart from this: if the argument for attacking Japan were really so reasonable, as you suggest, then why resort to public deception...?
euclidxxx 1 year ago
@euclidxxx
But all that is ultimately irelevant.
Suppose I was a store owner who decided not to sell to some known neighbourhood criminal thug. Okay you can say it is provoking his anger, butlegally and morally it is my right.
A bit ago it was revealed that the US had plans to invade Saudi Arabian oil fields if there was an oil crises. Well such an attack would be as illegal and immoral as the Japaneseattack.
Vebinz 1 year ago
@Vebinz
read The Imperial Cruise by James Bradley.
America had a secret treaty with Japan. Teddy Roosevelt expressed Americas desire for Japan to invade Korea. He wanted Japan to be a proxy for America. That China was a race in decline and Japan was a rising race and westernized.
T. Roosevelt literally negotiated for those actions you claim warranted sanction.
Also
If American elites hadn't of pushed eugenics in Germany would there of been a holocaust?
abram730 1 year ago
@abram730
I have not read that book, but even if true, that still neither justifies Japanese aggression against China in the 1930's, nor their attack on Pearl Harbor after FDR decided to cut oil to them over these aggression (regardless of his ulterior motives).
Vebinz 1 year ago
We were not a world power to stop the british blockade in WW2 like we are know, just saying
snowpred 1 year ago
I agree to all of this, with one exception. The leader of the Taliban (Someone completly else then Osama) was prepared to give up Osama Bin Laden if he actually had something to do with the things USA said he has done, he called for several meetings with him and asked him if he had something to do with it, and everytime he simply said. They are lying.
ThePharaohBender 1 year ago
There is a song that I would like to dedicate to this book its called Masters of War. Youtube it and enjoy! Thanks I will read the grand chess board because the great satan lays bare there.
EmeterioBetances 1 year ago
@EmeterioBetances Read a free copy from the net, so as not to profit Brzezinski & co.
euclidxxx 1 year ago
Except that 9/11 was a false flag not blow back, but other than that, yup.
sunRsaturn 1 year ago
notice that since communism was defeated and cold war ended we need a new boggy man called war on terrorism. what a joke.
Rico8458 1 year ago
@Rico8458
The only thing we know about communism and Russia is what they told us. What if that wasn't true either?
What if there really wasn't a Cold War?
CosmosPrivateer 1 year ago
YEs......you have to motivate People with LIES.......
"Yes, David you can slay Goliath"....
I think Swanson is way off on defending Europe during WWII.
Korea and Vietnam were stupid Wars (but we didn't know that back then, that Communism would fail on its own)..
The Middle East Wars...?????.......?????......?????..... yeah, they suck....and we could be living in a World were Saddam was still ruling Iraq and 9/11 never happened (dreams, dreams, dreams).
UnderseaCaveman 1 year ago
If you take a look at the world from space, you will realize there are no borders carved out. National boundaries are and always have been arbitrary lines, drawn by violence, and used by the ruling national elites to oppress, divide, and control the ordinary people of the world. Do we human beings have to accept the dominant global order, and the mass injustices, oppression, exploitation, and violence that are characteristic of it?
I think genuine Democracy would be a much better idea......
wnxsilence 1 year ago
We have two choices in this critical moment in human history; either we accept a society based on functioning democracy, where the general population can exercise direct control on political and economic institutions, or we continue on in a world based on autocracy.
wnxsilence 1 year ago
Continued military conflict, war, and violence is an inherent symptom of the global capitalist system. This system has always been based on coercion, rather than freedom.
Until those who control the state, hold power and wealth in a society, i.e the ruling elite, continue to be the dominant force in shaping policy, then the plague of military conflict will continue to destroy humanity.
wnxsilence 1 year ago
realnews rocks! brilliant work mr. jay!
strawprophet 1 year ago
Smedley Butler was correct: gangsters for capitalism
greatbroad 1 year ago
war is a crime indeed and promoting false information is too(should be applied to religion as well)...so PROSECUTE PROSECUTE PROSECUTE
EasternGateGuardian 1 year ago
"If, in the eyes of the almighty higher consciousness, all men and women are created equal, then all can become doctors-- so then, who will carry our golf bags on Wednesdays?"
~~carefulcarpenter
carefulcarpenter 1 year ago
...and why did the US go to war with Nazi Germany except that they played the capitalism game better than the US did (which is why it was admired among those who deem themselves the ruling class)? The Nazis wanted to rule the world, the US feels that's the job of the US elite, using the US military as the enforcer, the duped US taxpayer funds to pay for the trillions they BORROW, with us as the perennial debtors!
FRTothus 1 year ago
@FRTothus Look up Bush's family tree.
clusterbombcocks 1 year ago
Paul Jay reeks of establishment, drinks climate-ade and is hardly the 'real' news.
creamrising 1 year ago
Of course they had to lie, can you imagine Bush at a Press conf. saying ``Hey guys let's loot the middle east`` or in WW2 ``Now that we made a fortune by selling wepons to both sides, we should enter that shit, beat the losing side and take all the credits`` or `` lets try our new toy on the Japs and see how it goes``
Mankindfails 1 year ago
Every single person I care about will have this video link in their inbox when they wake up this morning. What a fantastic interview!
WellIAMScottish 1 year ago
Another EXCELLENT report from Real News. You guys are on fire and waking up more people every day. Good for you and us!
WellIAMScottish 1 year ago 2
Also Dont forget the original from the 30s by Smedley Butler "War is a Racket", its available for free on the internet and its quite short. Also worth reading 2 pages (14-15, or 15-16) from operation Northwoods (1962) by the JCoS showing the extent the top military were willing to go; false flags, remote controlled planes, etc. and that false flag are designed to fool most of the military, gov, media as well as the public.
Btw the "War on Terror" is a Fraud, fake
Rickdeckard2020 1 year ago
whassa happeninga in min. 5? on the pic?
Realizalize 1 year ago
The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles. The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject class has had nothing to gain and all to lose — especially their lives.
Congest 1 year ago 32
@Congest its the elite, not the master class.
restlys 1 year ago
Wars are fought in the material interests of the ruling class. Always.
Congest 1 year ago 10
This man is a genius...read any history book and you can see it written in plain black and white.
wildshoobie05 1 year ago
The lie is "We need wars to keep the peace."
pcuimac 1 year ago
Great interview!
silvercoin1111 1 year ago
Go to TRNN.com to see interview with Brzezinski and the grand chess board
TheRealNews 1 year ago 4
@TheRealNews
So
lordblazer 1 year ago
Nothing is more profitable for international bankers than war. If you ever want to know any reason for war.....follow the money trail. It's always about the cash.
jerseygrl5 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
War is what old men do to younger generations without real guidance. War is what fathers encourage kids to participate in for the long term benefits. War is what skews the less enlightened down a road of brotherly ignorance. War is what promotes pride and self righteousness. War is what portrays duty under these conditions as admirable.
clusterbombcocks 1 year ago
Comment removed
clusterbombcocks 1 year ago
"Not that war doesn't exist of course." lol For moment that's what I thought "War Is a Lie" meant. lol
unorthodoxtrotsky 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Good video. Too bad TRN can't draw the parallel to the economy and pretty much all other government screw-ups which are perpetuated with lies
Government lies to continue war
Government is honest about its economic policy that allows that war to be continued
Errrr...
asalade 1 year ago
WAR IS PEACE
solimiansky 1 year ago
Unfortunately Westerners have been engaged in false wars since 1492. Wars have been sold to the populations as missions of evangelization, civilization, and now democracy. To rid the world of "barbarity" . However, the elites have always been able to gain control over populations and resources throughout history.
Alberto2382 1 year ago 3
This video needs to go viral. As the video was just about to end, I was typing a comment saying "people should also check out Zbigniew Brzezinski's book 'the Grand Chessboard' to better understand the USA's current foreign (war) policy" but Paul Jay did it. BTW, the book IS available free online if you prefer to NOT line that jackass Brzezinski's pockets. Check out Scribd, I believe it's on there.
distilledlaw34 1 year ago 23
@distilledlaw34 "BTW, the book IS available free online if you prefer to NOT line that jackass Brzezinski's pockets." LOL!! freakin' awesome man :)
prelude2abliss69 1 year ago
I'm definitely gonna buy his book.
Hackiesacker007 1 year ago 2
How George Orwell accurately predicted the future... "War is Peace"
yusukeshinyama 1 year ago 3
Sean Penn covered this in that movie of his - I'm tired so I might be wrong, someone help.
st8ed 1 year ago
War=Money
Money=Power
Power=Control
Control=Slavery
tannersanta 1 year ago 4
It's Israel Lobby drived the Iraq war. They were responsible for 4500 dead American soldires.
akamal1113 1 year ago 4
@akamal1113 Patriotism is a lie. Greed and domination are the reality. i.e. the gov't don't give a shit.
st8ed 1 year ago
war is death
rcdftnt 1 year ago
You can't talk about war being a lie without mentioning the Rothschilds, Warburgs, Windsors and Rockefellers.
elucidative 1 year ago 4
I'm very liberal but this guys arguments were pretty fucking stupid.
hac1m 1 year ago
@hac1m how so?
Galicia1981 1 year ago
how was the revolutionary war a lie?
captcrais101 1 year ago
@captcrais101 Because you are still fucking Slaves.
Idiot.
ToeInspector 1 year ago
@ToeInspector That is not what I meant. I am asking how is the American revolution not necessary? The British were opressing us I don't see how that could have been dealt with peacefully. I am anti-war but I still don't see how the orginal American settlelers could have gotten rid of British Opression peacefully
captcrais101 1 year ago
@captcrais101 Why was it necessary ? so you serve the Elites who OWN America rather than the Queen.Whats the difference ? If I am a Slave, and I am sold to a new "Master" does that make me a free man ?
No,it does not.
ToeInspector 1 year ago
@ToeInspector his original question was legitimate. Remember that you once knew little too. Educate kindly. Save harsh words for the real aholes. The theorists are in-fighting too much. Try sharing ideas. If you are a true theorist, you'll know that this kind of communication is misleading
skipabeat03 1 year ago
@skipabeat03 I don't think one man should follow another man,that is the great lie.
Modern Society is built on death,rape and destruction among every other sin imaginable committed against Our Mother.Earth.
Fuck ideas,Its way past that point.
People know what they need to do,but they are spineless,inbread and useless at anything that requires critical or serious thought.
Major changes in lifestyle are comming to Western Societies,the road to Total Dommination is long,but not endless.
ToeInspector 1 year ago 2
@ToeInspector If it's past the point of ideas then get in line for your RFID chip. You started your comment with 'I don't think'. That's an idea.
skipabeat03 1 year ago
@captcrais101 Well, Parliament was only a few MPs short of granting America rights. A few elections and common sense would have won out.
DerBlitzStag 1 year ago
@captcrais101 "how was the revolutionary war a lie?" Because the rich white land owners, Washington and Jefferson, used to colonialists to fight against the British so that they could be in charge.
delreydavid 1 year ago
@delreydavid The British had collapsed the smuggling trade and those smugglers payed bribes.... an interesting factor. Something like 99% of some goods were smuggled into America to avoid a duty of six-pence. "The right of Parliament to charge foreign molasses with a duty of six-pence was unquestionable; but for Parliament to reduce the six-pence to three-pence is a violent usurpation of unconstitutional authority." - William Knox
abram730 1 year ago
@abram730 A bunch of corrupt criminals got pissed and started pamphleteering in an attempt to do in the colonies what was done in France. It didn't work so they instigated the situation from Briton. The stamp act did spark, as did instigating a monetary collapse in the colonies.
abram730 1 year ago
i dont like the guy who does the interviews he is so stiff, and fake
kainniak1 1 year ago
@407buddy Oh, yes! To our old hicks he was especially. But that is where homo spaien's humor comes from Ironic truth contained in a joke. We had a lot of honest people back then. ;)
Licmycat 1 year ago
sound like pj is in favor of world domination... and he has a hard on for chomsky...
santi781 1 year ago
Comment removed
touchnova 1 year ago
Two people don't like to hear the truth.
Unoppressed 1 year ago
Such as the official account of 9/11.
PersianPaladin 1 year ago
Excellent and the author was right in each of his comments about the lies used for the purpose of pushing war on the American people, and could have added that F.D.R. Secretary of the Navy in ww1 along with Churchill from England allowed the Lusitania to be attacked and sunk for the purpose of it igniting one of Americas response for entry into the war to end all wars
mikeoli 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
japanese were afraid of starting a land war on the US if they won the Pacific because they knew how may guns the American populace owned...War is a racket
mike6459 1 year ago
Time Banks would remove the overbearing use of debt-currency and thereby reduce the power the mongers have over the world. Make money pointless and the lubrication to motivate people disappears.
I love the real news, thanks for this piece.
and as always, peace.
nekopheliac 1 year ago
Comment removed
mike6459 1 year ago
I'm the kind of guy who believes that American politicians aren't evil, but rather naturally flawed people who (for the most part) do what they think is right and in the best interests of the country. I believe that Bush went into Iraq because he believed it was the right thing to do; because he believed that the intelligence he had at hand was accurate. This does not mean that these people are always right and that there are no lies. But that's a far cry from this man's (Swanson) extremism.
chapaev36 1 year ago
@chapaev36 You are naive and from your reply do not the first thing about world politics, Disney was made for people like you, stick to that it is more to your liking and stay away from geo-politics for now
mikeoli 1 year ago
So this guy says that the US government lies all the time, he has exposed many false flags in his books but he still believes in the official story of 9/11 (aka The official Fairy Tale of 9/11)?
9/11 was orchestrated by Israel and Neocon Zionists in Bush's circle, if you want to end the wars based on lies then EXPOSE 9/11.
0xTRX007 1 year ago
So true
jakeman121acdc 1 year ago
brilliant vid
Xenthoid 1 year ago
"war is a racket"
ourpangea 1 year ago
@ourpangea absolutely correct and a great book by a greater American
mikeoli 1 year ago
Perhaps the greatest piece of pro-war propaganda ever made was the philosophical view that human beings are naturally warlike. But if that were true, no government would have to engage in lies or propaganda to get its people to kill other people. Even in 1914 when millions of volunteers for the armed forces seemed to come out of nowhere, it was because of decades of propaganda. Human beings cannot kill other human beings, only people who have been demonized.
blackiron60 1 year ago 3
@blackiron60 Perfect answer the truth spot on
mikeoli 1 year ago
good work
thanks again TRN
Zoidborg1 1 year ago
Let Make The Water Turn Black. Blackwater.
LukeCoulson 1 year ago
Thank you for this video .. for exposing the military industrial complex ..
xaotiko 1 year ago
I hope there's an audiobook soon.
Fetchdafish 1 year ago
great segment
3108711289 1 year ago
watch: the story of your enslavement
channel: stefbot
3108711289 1 year ago
So sad, *tear*
juanmora19910209 1 year ago
The U.S. involvement in World War I was based on a lie, too. He left that one out.
burnindownthehouse 1 year ago
@407buddy least it makes people stop shooting each other. get them fat on them happy meals.
CyborgNinja117 1 year ago
"I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in." - General Smedley
cont...
techcafe 1 year ago
"I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903." - General Smedley
cont...
techcafe 1 year ago
"In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents." - General Smedley
techcafe 1 year ago
war with China will be interesting
KillerWhaleSFl 1 year ago
@KillerWhaleSFl
honestly i hope we dont, because china would overpower us with sheer numbers.
lildread1 1 year ago
"War is a racket. It always has been. It is the oldest, most profitable and surely the most vicious. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small 'inside' group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes." - US General Smedley
techcafe 1 year ago
I think that why they assassinated Martin Luther King, because he was against the Vietnam war. Google his speech on Vietnam and you decide
midwestcharm 1 year ago
@midwestcharm lol everyone famous that got assassinated was from the gov amirite?
CyborgNinja117 1 year ago
@407buddy
No. When you weigh those conquered resources against the mind-bogglingly enormous costs of waging a modern war, you find that it is a huge loss. It does, however, provide a really good excuse for spending tax money.
Think of it as less of a land grab, where the money is taken from the victims, and more of a money laundering scheme - a quasi-legitimacized reason for the US national state to take a lot of money from a lot people in the US, and give it to some other people in the US.
PanzerDivisionBOM 1 year ago
I talk to a lot of people abut these perpetual wars the U.S. has started. I swear the people have been drinking the Kool-Aid (propaganda) the U.S. had been putting out there for so long they don't know anything. Too bad the draft is going on right now because if it was, there just wouldn't be any of these senseless wars. Look up Eisherhower's Farewell Speech about the Military Industrial Complex and you will understand what is going on.
czubspenx 1 year ago
war isnt a lie... the reasons for war is a lie..
Eirexeyes 1 year ago
Most people know the wars are based on lies. They pretend it is truth to salve their conscience.
Also America has been spared the destruction that many other nations and continents befell during the last century. Not having the collective memory of the tragedy, despair and horror, the true face of war, makes it easier to keep glorifying anything military.
Its really amazing. The US is one of the most militaristic nations of all time yet has a self image of being peace loving.
Northern5tar 1 year ago 24
@Northern5tar i know right its wierd how ever nation ever has done something like this in one way or another, hypocrasy is human fucking nature but becuase of our need to be selfish and greed, and add the internet how all everyones personal info is going public, which is how it should be.
kainniak1 1 year ago
@Northern5tar Americans are born insane, the sin's of the Father ......
ToeInspector 1 year ago
@Northern5tar Great comment, made my day
BrixSnBs 1 year ago
Pogo quotation is "We have met the enemy and he is us."
Licmycat 1 year ago
@407buddy U must be awfully young to not know who Pogo was. Look up Pogo on Wiki-Pogo (comic strip)
Licmycat 1 year ago
Finally someone who has the sound of reason in his voice. I'd definitely read his book. Keep up the good work!
Iamfatbrain 1 year ago
All Americans must read James Douglass's book "JFK and the UNSPEAKABLE: Why He Died and Why It Matters" to fully understand the reason that war and nuclear proliferation continues unabated...50 years ago, in JFK's day, and now in our present time. And 50 years before JFK, at the end of WWI, General Smedley Butler said "War is a racket that profits the few at the expense of the many." How and when will we ever stop this insanity? If we do not, we will all perish.
WomanforPeaceSanity 1 year ago
I think the view count isn't changing...so good I watched it twice... wtf?
madebutante 1 year ago
lol destiny pooing on innocent indians.
WavesOfTrolls 1 year ago
Like MLK. I don't know about you, but i won't study war no more.
PeepsNotSheep1111 1 year ago
@407buddy Oh yeah. Pogo's creator was a sort of prophet, wasn't he? :)
Licmycat 1 year ago
it's me or the title is stupid?
WavesOfTrolls 1 year ago
@WavesOfTrolls it's you.
drjacklint 1 year ago
@drjacklint it's not war that is a lie, it's the rhetorics used. lol wtf is that some kind of metonymy or something?
WavesOfTrolls 1 year ago
@WavesOfTrolls Nope....nothing wrong with the title. It must be you who is stupid. Put the cap back on the glue and you'll feel better in a day or two.
000deadcalm000 1 year ago
@000deadcalm000 lol might as well say your mom is a lie since she's a bitch and fucked a lot of men. rofl stupid cocksucker.
WavesOfTrolls 1 year ago
Don't pretend, --- This is the best YouTube upload today.
PeakOilCountdown 1 year ago 19
The German General Staff sent two officers in March of 1939 to beg surrender terms. They even offered to arrest Hitler. They were denied all peace offers. 58,000,000 people died after the German military and the Japanese Emperor had both offered to surrender.
The US entered WW I to bankrupt our allies and make New York the world financial capitol. They also wanted to set up a Zio-Communist government in Russia and a Jewish colony in Palestine.
Horse237 1 year ago
@Horse237 Your dates are off. In march 1939 WW2 had not even started.
BusterXXXL 1 year ago