Added: 3 years ago
From: flacktv
Views: 20,183
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (594)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Green party is the fabian society. Look it up socialists. Carbon credit taxes will only allow trading of said credits between the international elites thus allowing them to impose more destruction in the third world. Global warming is a hoax perpetrated by the elites through fear based promotions and dominant social memes.

  • May I also congratulate Al Gore, who despite the stigma of having been a Democrat politician, stands up. Like a man. Not like the pseudo-Republican, pseudo-conservative, pseudo-Christian, pseudo-redneck (yup! you don't even kwalify!) time-wasters who crawl and ooze thru their own slime. Stand up like a man or don't stand up at all (female colleagues, please transpose the textual gender).

  • Al Fraud Gore the carbon tax proponent "profit" prophet

  • What a relief. Global warming is natural and will restore the fisheries, will restore the water tables, will reduce population growth, will repair the soils and reduce flooding, will reduce our reliance on oil and mechanised food, will strengthen ecosystems and bring back extinct species, will rehabilitate hydroxyl and ozone concentrations, will bring back the ice, the whales, and that happy sense of 'feelin' gooood!' Eden, here we come!

  • If you have to resort to SLANDER to defeat somebody, then...

    YOU LOSE BY DEFAULT !!!

  • To suggest that those who are concerned about global warming are communists or red or greens or watermelons IS JUST PLAN WRONG AND STUPID.

    Also to suggest that being concerned about the human influence is "peddling fear" is nothing less than...

    SLANDER !!

    Indeed the TONE from us is a very different one:

    WE CAN ***DO*** SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

    Climate change is NOT some kind of Armageddon.

    THE FEAR IS NOT COMING FROM US !!!

    I have a scientific background in R&D and I AM **NOT** A FEAR MONGER.

  • Nope. Sorry, wrong yet again. It is the left environmentalists that were peddling fear with A.G.W. Follow the money. As soon as the US govt started dolling out millions in reasearch grants for the study of so-called global warming, many Universities got on the band wagon, establishing research units and happily taking research money to study g.w. U caution me against "slander" and in the next breath u call me "STUPID". In addition to being a liberal dem, you're a hypocrite too!

  • @wildnites558

    Following the money shows us that the $TRILLION right wing disinformation machine headed by the Koch Brothers who control the baggie movement funds completely the lies spewed by imbeciles such as yourself. BTW ... I am an ultra-conservative Republican activist.

  • You don't have to lie like the other poster did and tell me you're a conservative in order to attempt to win me over to your leftwing side. I pretty much know by simply reading your words that you area young leftist who marches passionately the the OWS traveling freak-show. I don't know if the the Koch bros. have trillions of dollars to spend (I think ur making this up), but I'm sure you know that your hero billionaire slime ball fascist George Soros donates billions to the left.

  • I don't think the planet cares about "world domination."

    If that is the level this discussion has reached, then I might as well argue with monkeys.

  • And they can get their "carbon tax" and domination and control of all societies worldwide, by the implementation of continual, never-ending lies, misinformation, scare tactics, and propaganda about the global catastrophe that is imminent if we don't take action IMMEDIATELY against the grim specter of global warming. And the warmists can just keep repeating their lies over and over in the complicit media, tv, radio, magazines, music, comics, etc until there is gradual capitulation.

  • Comment removed

  • TURN THIS ARGUMENT INTO A POLITICAL ONE AND YOU WILL *CORRUPT* IT.

  • This argument has fallen of the rails when somebody (in fact many) says:

    " Or does everyone have to believe the left/liberal orthodoxy that it's a slam-dunk certainty that the planet is ecologically doomed?"

    This has turned a scientific argument into a POLITICAL ONE.

    This has become framed as Left versus Right.

    It is no longer about the health of the planet.

    It is no longer about science.

    THE PLANET IS NOT A POLITICAL FOOTBALL !!!

    Besides, ***NOBODY*** IS SAYING PLANET IS DOOMED.

  • You're preaching to the choir on that one. But the far left have politicized the environment.Don't know how old you are but I'm almost 55 and I can recall the liberals and the left politicizing the environment way back in '70. The left/liberals have politicized sex, race, education, the law, sports, music, animal "rights", religion, entertainment, business, most recently food, nutrition. So, what's to stop them from politicizing the environment? They politicized everyting else!

  • @wildnites558

    Surprise... surprise..

    I AM OLDER THAN YOU...

    and it also looks like a little wiser...

    and a LOT less scared than you...

    who is still seeing commies under bed.

    It's pathetic. GROW UP.

  • @customanalogue I don't "see commies under beds", I just listen to the words and observe the deeds of the your beloved leftwingers, and I know what evil and mayhem they have in store for America.

  • @wildnites558

    "beloved leftwingers"

    You really don't know me at all and have no idea.

    In the Bible God says in Rev 11:18 that he will "bring to ruin those ruining the earth, and indeed some translations says God will "destroy those destroying the earth".

    Forget leftwingers or rightwingers, the elephant in the room is God. If they don't meet his requirements then they will ALL be accountable.

    We pray "let your Kingdom [government] come, in order that YOUR WILL be done on Earth as in Heaven."

  • According to this CO2 will save the planet?

    Problem is, too much of a good thing can kill you!

    Want examples? Heaps of them.

    Two robbers break into a bank vault on a weekend. Then they hear a draft and the door shutting. One robber gets out his calculator. "I have good news and I have bad news." The other robber asks "what's the good news?" The first robber says "there is enough oxygen in here to last until Monday." "Yes, but what is the bad news?" There is a pause... "its a long weekend."

  • @customanalogue The long weekend being the conservative resistance to proactive risk management. The IPCC already tone down their language to minimum and present optimistic scenarios - it doesn't help. IPCC are still made out as pariahs by the politicist axe-grinders. We need to cut short the long weekend.

  • The whole GW "crisis" is complete farce. The phonies at E. Anglia were caught with their pants down attempting to "hide the decline". Mann's "Hockey Stick" is a complete work of poor fiction attempting to discount the medieval warm period in order to make it appear as if temperature increases in the last 60 years are an anomaly. Such fruadulent lies by the left and the UN. A Canadian scientist had to use the FOIA to get Mann to release his computer code work. The globalists are such liars.

  • @wildnites558

    If CO2 does what CO2 will do, how are you going to explain that to your children?

    Oops!

    CO2 does not obey your wishes. Whatever happens WILL happen. Your comments have less force that being swiped by a feather.

    Just playing the blame games changes NOTHING.

    But by calling people "fraudulent", "liars" and other even more slanderous things, then maybe that shows a losing argument with a need to overcompensate.

    The nasty stuff is only coming from the one side - YOURS!

  • @customanalogue "Your comments have less force that being swiped by a feather."

    That's funny, then why would you even bother responding to my comments? Maybe my comments have more "force" than you're willing to admit. xD

  • @wildnites558

    I know it was funny. LOL

    Your comeback was rather weak, though.

    Seriously, what has personalities got to do with it? Or who is more smart or savvy? Or funnier?

    We have a serious problem and the question is not even a political one, yet some are saying we should be doing NOTHING and the others are saying we should be doing SOMETHING.

    May I point out:

    The PLANET DOES NOT VOTE.

    Politics is an UGLY AFFAIR - yet in much of Europe BOTH SIDES ARE GENUINELY CONCERNED.

  • @wildnites558

    And why is this being cloned into a Left versus Right argument?

    As if the planet or its weather really cares?

    MANY who are genuinely concerned by this issue & take it seriously, are in fact CONSERVATIVE.

    Indeed I am most certainly *NOT* Left.

    I believe abortion is wrong, homosexuality against human nature, marriage is for a man and a woman etc - ALL CONSERVATIVE VIEWS.

    So appreciate if you did STEREOTYPE me, but then again that is what the deniers like to do & not play clean.

  • @customanalogue Anyone in their right mind would have those conservative views.

    However to believe in global warming from CO2, even though there is no evidence to support it, and the fact that there is so much corruption in this field. How do you know for sure?

  • @MrOTLChamp

    Oil is not going to last forever, and right now is becoming dirtier & dirtier. There is no shortage of energy, just don't be lazy about it. Denmark put a price on carbon many decades ago and they now produce near 25% of their energy from wind etc. Also making money selling their technologies. Putting a price on carbon raised so much funds that was invested and they are now reaping good results.

    This can be repeated, just don't be lazy - IT'S GOOD BUSINESS,

    Oil is not the answer.

  • @customanalogue Denmark's wind power is only good when the wind is blowing. And even then, the government has to subsidize it. There's noway it a good example for the US.

    It's a waste of time and space. We have plenty of windmills here near Palm Springs, and they are ugly and take up miles and miles of space for one little city. And it's still not enough. Until they come up with something involving the sun that's efficient, and cost effective, nuclear or fossil fuel is the only way.

  • @MrOTLChamp NOisy too. I have hear the hideous whine from those windmills can be heard for miles - and it's continuous. I think i'd rather live near an airport!

  • @wildnites558 "I have hear the hideous whine from those windmills". You're right. it's truly horrible, and they're very unsightly. We need to promote nuclear till the mess is sorted out. Our glorious leaders will still get their carbon credits.

  • @MrOTLChamp

    HAHAHAHA Mrotlchamp is deleting his posts again. You trying for deniablility?????

  • @MISTERWHITE111 You are absolutely out of your mind. I never deleted any of my post's. try again tard.

  • @MrOTLChamp Way to change the subject from the environment to religion! You don't even know me. And I don't do drugs. I know that many stoners on the left want to legalize them, but I'm pretty much a sober dude. So nice try.

  • @wildnites558 Are you sure you're talking to the right person?

    I don't remember saying anything about religion on here?

  • @wildnites558 Just to let you know I have had many discussions with @MrOTLChamp & this person makes crazy claims & when you present the FACTS, the EVIDENCE & the SCIENCE that shows how wrong his absurd claims are this person changes the subject to something else. He is nothing but a IGNORANT "USEFUL IDIOT" for the fossil fuel industry! When he runs out of stuff to say he then goes to the stolen emails as if they prove the science of Anthropogenic Climate Change is wrong. Good Luck!

  • @MISTERWHITE111 I have had many discussions with @MrOTLChamp & this person changes the subject when confronted with FACTS, EVIDENCE & the SCIENCE that rejects all of this person's absurd claims. YES, this person does erase comments...Just so you know.

  • @wildnites558

    And to suggest ALL climate scientists are on the Left.... ?

    THAT is plainly too stupid for words.

    Maybe you can't see that?

    Let people, not matter WHAT they consider themselves have a RIGHT to have a different view from you without being slandered as "fraudulent" and "liars'.

    That is a "YOU LOSE" argument.

    Besides CO2 does what it wants to do and you and I have no say about that. Right?

  • @customanalogue No, not **All** scientists. I did not mean to convey that idea. I would say all "POLICIALLY MOTIVATED" scientists -- the one-worlders, the globalists, the statists, the neo-marxists, the anti-capitalists, the OWS apologizers, the big-fat-sloppy-exorbitant-gove­rnment-in-yo'-face scientists. This is who I mean.

  • @wildnites558

    AHAH !!! You have just admitted it !!!

    The CAT is out of the bag !!!

    YOU HAVE TURNED AN ARGUMENT ABOUT SCIENCE INTO A *** POLITICAL*** ARGUMENT.

    I thank you for confirming.

    I will argue the science as do others with a science background - NOT THE POLITICS OF THE "COLD WAR" REVISITED.

    Your Old Enemy the Commies are gone, YOU NEED ***NEW*** ENEMIES...

    And hard-working SCIENTISTS are the NEW COMMIES. it's also ANTI-INTELLECTUAL - old habits die hard.

  • The "reds" have turned "green", that's all. What they couldn't obtaing thru war and world domination, the neo-marxists will attempt to get thru lying and public scare tactics about the environment that are mostly not true. They use scare language in order to get us to believe that unless we take immediate action by using the UN to decide how much carbon a country can create, the earth is doomed, the waters of the Atlantic will be on our steps in just 15 years, blah, blah, blah. All lies.

  • @customanalogue Wrong again. And backwards, I might add. It's the world-wide left, the globalists, you know, the people a "good Republican" like you believe, which are the ones that have made it political. I just point it out that's all. I don't want it to be political but if the left is doing everyting politically to force their leftist enviro agenda down our throats, well then I as a free-thinking, free-speaking American will have something to say. And I will protest.

  • @wildnites558

    What?

    Sorry, but I read it three times and I assume you have at least average IQ, yet I cannot make any sense of what you are saying?

    There is a lack of intellectual discipline - like giving two different answers in one sentence. That is not how the English language was intended to be used.

  • I think that you're right - politically right. The only global warming lie is the one perpetuated by the petrol companies and their paid (directly or indeirectly) whores.

  • Prove that "the petrol companies directly of indirectly) are perpetuating all of the GW skepticism. I mean, you can certainly say that but what real proof is there that all this skepticism is petrocorp based? don't you think people can think for themselves? Do their own independent research? Or does everyone have to believe the left/liberal orthodoxy that it's a slam-dunk certainty that the planet is ecologically doomed? Must the research always prove the IPCC correct? What if the IPCC's wrong?

  • @wildnites558 Each can choose for themselves scientists or politicians. Who do you trust?

  • @wildnites558

    Sorry, but you are a fool saying " the planet is ecologically doomed" !!!

    WHO is saying THAT?

    If your house is leaking you plug the leak to limit the damage.

    That is ALL anybody is saying.

    So it is ***YOU*** who is ESCALATING FEAR.

    It is ***YOU*** who is GUILTY of the very thing you accuse others of.

    Be honest with yourself, for your own sake's, not mine.

  • I'm escalating fear? I thought the whole point of the Gore movie (which is chocked full of inaccuracies) was to escalate fear in the public mind about g.w. Fear is the operative device here in the last 20 yrs or so with the compliant media reporting everything the warmists desire as if they are a slamdunk fact - which they are not.They're the ones that used the hot summer of '98 to as a pretense to begin propagandizing on g.w, about the disappearing coastlines, polarbears, icebergs melting, etc

  • ROFL. "I guess there was a period in England where there was a bunch of wine" so there is no global warming. "I'm not a scientist and I know nothing about the climate", but I'm going to give you my misinformed opinion and you should listen to it...

    Do you guys even listen to yourselves?

  • @bstotts01 what hes getting at is england went through a warm period, much warmer than it is now.

    this doesnt PROVE anything by a long shot, just another contributing fact that global warming due to man is a LIE!

  • @moeman444 watch 'the global warming hoax explained for dummies' or 'the great global warming swindle'

  • @moeman444 Both of which have been totally rebutted and demonstrated to be entirely fraudulent by qualified scientists.

  • @Vierotchka entirely fraudulent? pleeeeeeeeeease. do you disagree the earth has been hotter in the past and that CO2 levels have been higher than now?

  • Why keep repeating the bogus context that CO2 helps plants? That's like saying smoke (in any quantity) is fine because it makes beef taste good. Anything in moderation can be OK but that's beside the point!

    Try to sleep in a tiny sealed room and see how much of a "life giving gas" CO2 is after the breathable oxygen is depleted. It's devious to ignore the context of how a gas affects its surroundings. It's been known since the 1800s that CO2 is a strong greenhouse gas per its relative quantity.

  • @NoEcologyNoEconomy "Why keep repeating the bogus context that CO2 helps plants?" The skeptix like to quote the FACE studies, but I haven't seen a proper criticism of FACE yet. They also like that CO2 is just a TRACE gas, and therefore inconsequential. They also like that H2O is also a GHG and much more abundant. Maybe they also like that the rainforests are torn down to make way for palm oil plantations and to provide hardwood for those that still use it (-_-).

  • @NoEcologyNoEconomy Then you might as well kill all the vegetation on earth, because plants "breath out" CO2. C02 is a product of plant respiration. So it's natural, vital and a one of the primordial constituent elements of the planet earth. To suddenly see it as a "poison" to try to prove some political or envirnomental point is off-the-wall silly. Sorry but CO2 is not polution. Some of the enrivo-nuts confuse CO (carbon MONoxide) with CO2 (Carbon DIoxide), I know that's not you, right?

  • @wildnites558 Sorry, meant to say plants "breathe in" CO2. The plants and vegetation then "breathe out" O2. Plant life produces nearly all of the O2 the earth's animal life breathe in.

  • SEPP, Singer and the Oregon Petition have been widely debunked as shill BS. This is old news.

  • I was informed that the 'scientists on the list' included first-year biologists, Mickey Mouse and 'Marilyn Monroe'. Course I didn't believe it. Actually, some of the scientists strongly objected to being placed on this list. Others, such as R Lindzen are well-informed sceptics, who are also magically endowed with political acumen. Srsly tho, the idea that 97% of scientists are involved in a global hoax suggests something srsly wrong with our society, one way or the other.

  • Good thing then that 100s of thousands of REAL climate scientists DON'T "deny" the fact of global warming/human-made climate change. The list you're talking about is about as serious as an average comic book: Examples of "scientists" on the list: "LAWYERS".. It's crap, all of it, like it always is from the anti-scientific "climate-deniers"..By the way, I hear their teaming up with the evolution deniers,gravity deniers and flat-earthers now?Is there any truth to these rumours? You rumour experts?

  • More evidence/impacts of climate change series..Uganda edition:

    (Please read before the denier with all the sock puppet accounts censors it)..

    .

    Increased charcoal burning biggest threat to climate change in Uganda

    .

    The charcoal trade, referred to as “black gold” by Kampala traders, has become more profitable than the forests where trees are being indiscriminately cut down for charcoal-burning.

    .

    Kampala Daily Monitor, Uganda

    11 February 2012

  • "an online petition signed by scientists who reject several trendy assumptions regarding Global Warming, CO2 ". This idea of petitions (e.g. J Lovelock, Royal Soc) etc is neatly reflected in the polarisation of the views expressed here. The IPCC's role should be extended to ensure a more realistic debate and strategy are mapped out (including some control on the actual policies currently being implemented by individual countries). Some of us are tired of organised mud-slinging...

  • Global Cooling Continues

    Europe struggles to deal with killer cold

    Winnipeg Free Press 2/10/12

    Serbia was struggling to keep its power system going Thursday, after weeks of record-low temperatures in Europe

    Europe's freeze has claimed hundreds of lives, while tens of thousands of people are trapped in remote villages in Bosnia, Serbia and other hard-hit areas.

    In many European capitals, authorities have set up extra shelters for the homeless to help them survive temperatures as low as -36 C.

  • Or any university's meteorology faculties, or any scientist's work(real scientists working in the fields in question here, NOT the list of "lawyers, shoeshiners or whatever you find among your thousands.(By the way,lists of real climate experts just named "BOB" have been put together which are bigger than your fake,retarded list. Anyway, the world's experts are working on it even though you billybobs aren't And by the way,totally besides the issue:you play mean banjos even though you're tards!:)

  • @winterstellar "And by the way,totally besides the issue:you play mean banjos". You mean, "Deedle-eee-dee-dee-dee-dee-de­e-dee..." ? Heard it before...

  • This has to be the most ridiculous discussion on Global Warming that I've ever watched three clueless nuts have.

    They discount the overwhelming evidence for ACC from the millions of scientists that agree with it, and then boil it down to a TED talk that one guy gave.

    Brilliance? Methinks not. I wonder if that soundproofing is exposed because they ate all the paint chips off the wall...

  • @spacelizardlaw lol THANKS, couldn't say it better myself

  • Is this the best you can do? If you're gonna get three spokespeople for the anti-climate change movement you can do better than green guy "I'm not a scientist but" and the other two whack-job ditto-heads. This would be hilarious if it weren't pathetically brainless.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • It's very difficult to watch this beyond 0'20, when a guy says 31K scientists think global warming might be beneficial, and he doesn't seem to be trying to be satirical or facetious in a bad-taste sort of way. I tend to give skeptiks a hard time, all the more so for promoting public perceptions like the ones stated in this vid. Society has a lot to answer for for not educating properly (I regret to say, particularly in the US, tho not exclusively). PS I did watch it all - but I didn't vote it.

  • 2012 Alaskan dog sled races cancelled due to too much snow, too cold. Where is Al Gore? I want to hear that hoaxter and his carbon tax scheme say it has to do with the glaciers melting, exposing a rare block of ice. Causing massive snowfall and fridgid cold temperatures. LOL!

    Anybody besides the Unabomber, Charles Manson, and Al Gore still believe in this man made global warming crap?

  • @mojoidol "Anybody besides the Unabomber, Charles Manson, and Al Gore still believe in this man made global warming crap?" Agreed, We should keep pumping our shit into the atmosphere and ocean faster and faster. And we should keep cutting down them pesky forests, and shootin' them damn critters, an' just drink more fuckin' BEER, man !!!

  • @mojoidol ya preach it brother! how can people be so screwed. the earth has been in constant flux for ages. I have been waiting for canada to warm for ages but its still f'ing cold here.

  • @mojoidol ....i am laughing at the fucktards on here as well....parts of europe are having cold and snow spells not seen in ages...i'm confused...wouldn't global warming cause it to be warmer everywhere? but any other idiot who believes gore should send him more money...al gore a fucking lieing sack of shit

  • I-stubbed my big toe the other day & I-said "FLACK-FLACK FLACK" as it really hurt & as such I-was wondering what you guys think official scientific 'EXPERTS' may make of such a phenomena because speaking as a human without a university degree I-simply 'STUBBED MY FLACKING TOE' but perhaps there might be some kind of deeper inconvenient truth via a university qualified scientific ethical political psychological medical or spiritual perspective like with global warming & the carbon hoax?

    (sic)

  • @spacelizardlaw "STUBBED MY FLACKING TOE". The beautiful Gaia consoles you as she sweats and gasps in panic while forests burn, icecaps and glaciers melt, oceans acidify and heat up, the tundra thaws, monsoon fails, the stratosphere cools, hurricanes intensify even developing in the South Atlantic, fisheries collapse, coral reefs collapse, and nasty things happen in parts of the world I couldn't identify on a map, but my gosh, here in smallsville, weather's same as yesterday!

  • @bobinhk1 ... Eat too much Julian Lennon did you...?

    Got some of that 'SALT-WATER' welling in your eyes...?

    Or is it just some gastric "RE-FLAX" burning your throat...

    Too much Julian Lennon will do that so maybe it's time your beautiful earth-god GAIA takes her problems with our earth to the sun god "RA" because global warming is his fault whereas us humans are only guilty of polluting the water & raping the forests.

    Give-up listening to old Julian Lennon songs too you sad fcuk.

  • I found the list. Not ONE of them were climate scientists... THere's not much dissent among climate scientists on whether man is the cause of the global warming we're seeing, nor on the fact that it's the most rapid ever. BUt I guess real fact don't sell as well to retarded american right-wing billy Bobs, eh?

  • @winterstellar though they show in the video on the article, "More than 9.000 people with ph.Ds in atmospheric science climatology, earth science" and so forth. But of course they have no relevance beacuse that would make you wrong, stop being a sheep.

  • Comment removed

  • @payveful THese radio hosts are lying, preying on scientifically illiterates. Read up on the science, read up on the work that has gone into the UN's conclusions on man-made climate change instead of being duped by ignorants like these f&%kwits?

  • @winterstellar ....the un's conclusions? hahahahaha...the un is one of the biggest jokes on the planet since time began.... no thanx

  • @payveful "More than 9.000 people with ph.Ds in atmospheric science climatology, earth science.." Could you get real, please? If 9,000 PhD's were arguing against global-warming, it wouldn't be an issue. Either you mean 9.000 = 9 PhDs, or you've been hoodwinked by the brown-mouths.

  • @winterstellar Talk to a geologist a real established scientists! Climate Science is hardly a science, bad weather men, whats the 5 day for cast by the way? If you can't predict local weather how can you predict something as complex as the earth's climate, its dynamic, always has always will? That is why were skeptical, but you are so informed and so educated that you resort to name calling?

  • @winterstellar "real fact don't sell as well to retarded american right-wing billy Bobs, eh?". That sounds very insulting. Can't you say something nice about them? After all, they are anti-Government... (and anti-leftist). Er, at the same time.

  • @bobinhk1 -Urgent warning... All "BILLY-BOB'S" of the USA unite.

    It's OK to be anti-left wing & anti-Greenie & anti-Tea Party GOP & anti-Liberal as long as you know why & you came to your conclusions by a critical review of all available info & look if "BILLY-BOB" & his 500,000 cousins in Tennessee Arkansas Okalahoma Louisiana Texas & Hollywood who are also called either "BILLY" or "BOBBY" or "BILLY-RAY" choose to say the carbon cause of global warming is crap then more power to them.

  • @spacelizardlaw "anti-left wing". Couldn't that be put more concisely? (i.e. fewer letters). So are you saying that CO2 effects are a political study rather than a scientific one?

  • @bobinhk1 ... The star is certainly getting imperceptibly hotter...

    It's already beginning to burn it's iron within all of the sunspots...

    You could say that the CO2 hoax is a study in mass stupidity...

    Or just go with the Jet Fuel (Kerosene) melts steel science...

  • @bobinhk1 ... There are two-sides to this CO2 deception?

    Has anyone told ex-VP Al Gore & the rest of our human reality?

    What about that Pommie 'LORD WHATSISNAME' & his side of things?

    How are you going to 'PROVE' the star 'ISN'T' getting imperceptibly hotter & already burning iron within it’s sunspots & how will you 'PROVE' the CO2 hoax 'ISN'T' a study in mass stupidity & I'm yet to see anyone 'PROVE' simple Jet Fuel (Kerosene) can melt 911 steel even 'INSIDE' a fcuking blast furnace.

  • @spacelizardlaw "already burning iron within it’s sunspots". I really don't want to get drawn in at this level. What do you think the residue of "burnt iron" is? Are you going to give me a physics lesson here?

  • @bobinhk1 -Not having a degree in astro-physics quantum physics or the emerging New Age science of quantum phrenology which may be of some use to you & only just being able to grasp the concept of the big bang in 67 before it was even popular when only 10 all I'm able to say with any timid possibility of being right is that when iron burns in the centre of a sunspot it creates a heavier molecule & when the whole sun fulfils Christ's words & burns iron it soon gets even heavier fool.

  • @spacelizardlaw "when iron burns in the centre of a sunspot it creates a heavier molecule". I suppose it's too much to expect elementary education to include basic nuclear synthesis. Thanks for the laugh, anyway. You nuts will win once you've destroyed technology and society.

  • @bobinhk1 ... Shhhh... Don't tell poor Booby about nuclear fusion....

    The University of Hooterville might not have a nuclear curriculum...

  • @bobinhk1 ...Ve Vill Vin affter all...?

    Affter all deese years mit-den struggle...?

    Hass any-vunn told Der Furhrer Heil Hitler...?

    Der Germanic Jewish nuts are finally victorious...?

    Diss Iss vunderfool... Ve Vill Rejoice vidd Der Joy Den Spragen...

    (Und De 'NUTZ' as Ve must never forget Der 'NUTS' mit got-uss here)

  • @spacelizardlaw "The star is certainly getting imperceptibly hotter..." ok, I geddit, I geddit. Bye!

  • @bobinhk1 -Some Trolls seem proud of having extremely small minds.

    Either that or Illuminati have written dumb computer programs with feelings.

    (Tee-Hee) Back when Copernicus dared to go against the official scientific doctrine by saying the earth revolved around the sun do you think there were people like you saying (Ha-Ha) 'I-GET IT I-GET IT' & making a sign with their finger & thumb on their forehead?

    I-can show you where to research the sun getting hotter but fcuk-you Troll.

  • A link to the list???

  • I really hope NWOareScum gets some help. That guy's lost it.

  • @sicktoaster - faggot you are the same child-molester with 1000000s of faggot satanic sickest cunt imaginable channels. realise what you are - the sickest cunt ever spat out your whore mothers womb / test-tube. kill yourself paedo.

  • I'm really happy to watch these guys talking shite. Such a relief after all the copyright-infringing stuff you have to wade through in YouTube. I'd rather hear amateur shite than professional shite.

  • never claimed to be me or cloned my channel......so why does it make the same liar statements about me from its scab channel that it makes from the 1000000s of others it has.

    why the same desparate need for it to post sick lies about my beliefs that have never been true, while presenting itself as having ideas it only pretends to have cause it just read me posting them a few minutes before it stalked me and re-posted them.

    kill yourself scum.

  • Scientists say cut soot, methane to curb warming

    AP-An international team of scientists says it has figured out how to slow global warming: Stop focusing so much on carbon dioxide. They say the key is to reduce emissions of two powerful and fast-acting causes of global warming — methane and soot.

    Two dozen scientists from around the world ran computer models of 400 different existing pollution control measures and came up with 14 methods that attack methane and soot.

  • @RandomVersion

    What things add methane and soot that could be removed?

    And is there anything that can be added to the atmosphere that would have a cooling effect and why don't you ever hear scientists advocating that we add more of that?

  • @RandomVersion - "Two dozen scientists from around the world ran computer models of 400 different existing pollution control measures"

    when did your sicko astroturfer gay camp get instructions that computer models are now considered ok by you after all. do you get updates by email or phone of what you are allowed to believe or pretend is true or not? or do they just send it directly telepathically into your 1000000s-of-sick-heads?

    kill yourself shithead channel-cloning scumfuck schizo.

  • @NWOareScum How Warmer Summers Cause Colder Winters

    LiveScience

    Counter to what logic might suggest, warm summers actually trigger cold winters, according to a new study.

  • @RandomVersion - cunt you're the same sick paedo scab as @sicktoaster. kill yourself you sick evil channel-cloning pervrted satanic jackpsychofeathers scumfuck.

  • This video should be re-named: '31,000 "scientists" "reject" global warming "myth" '. That would be more accurate.

  • Comment removed

  • maths in action, in the mind of the kind of fucktard that thinks human activity has no effect on nature (how in the fuck is it even possible to go towards being that insane and thick as shit)

    "1 + 1 + 1 = 3 1s, so that is 31 plus three 0s for the three 1s makes 31,000

    derpy derpy doo."

    fucking kill yourself you godless insane babbling freak.

  • @NWOareScum

    Of course "Human activity" has an impact, and always has had an impact.

    But the impact of human beings have always been counterbalanced by the impacts of other human beings and of the environment.

    Of course we're going to see greater swings in our impact as our technology grows faster. That's why data in the 70s projected into the future made it look like we had global cooling, and now data projected into the future makes it look like global warming.

    It will swing back..

  • @sicktoaster - what counter-balance? and you're talking total shite there about what was found out about climate, when. those aren't the reasons they thought it was cooling. you're the same scumfuck with the 100000s of satanist tard channels, astroturfer jew freak.

    they've already said that the warming overall could lead to another ice-age. you've been shown those facts billions of times cunt.

    kill yourself you senile freak.

  • @NWOareScum

    Do you think all the hot air you are blowing is going to somehow end Global Warming?

    Do you think your anger and rage is going to change anyone's mind?

    It's interesting I never wrote the word "tao" yet you connected by comments to the concept of tao. I am a taoist, you clearly are not, you know not the tao.

    You should see a therapist for your anger issues and maybe you should have your mummy wash your mouth out with soap, at least if it's as dirty as your typing fingers.

  • @sicktoaster - scumfuck, look at the years you have spent cloning my accounts, claiming to be me, posting the sickest faggot shit imaginable, trying to talk about me like i am scum like you are instead of the person i really am.

    of course i bet you and fucked up your satanic paedo plans just with my computer.

    kill yourself you sick retarded 'jackpsychofeathers' etc conspiracy cunt.

  • @NWOareScum

    I have never claimed to be you or cloned any accounts. WTF are you talking about?

    Seriously, GET HELP! You are clearly sick in the head.

  • @sicktoaster - cunt you're the same scab as randomversion and all those other channels you use. you get told this each time you use yet another of your 10000000s of faggot antichrist paedo channels - but somehow you manage to pretend in your thick schizo head that hasn't even happened once.

    you think you can take money to be an astroturfer, then change to the right 'side' and act like you aren't the scab that was posting all the lies. same fake-jesus usual conspiracy.

    kill yourself

  • @NWOareScum

    ...the other way naturally. Humans are part of nature. Your fallacy is in treating nature as though it were separate. The forces of nature which interact with us every moment of our lives will gently and gradually change the way we do things without us even realizing it and eventually the cumulative effect of human activity will swing the temperature trends in the opposite direction again, not in a dangerous way just like we're not in any danger now. It's like a pendulum

  • @sicktoaster - child-molester, what fucking fallacy? you're the same paedo satanist scumfuck as adirtybird, posting sickest lies that i'm a meat-eating jewscum like you are - now you are making up the buiggest lie ever about me, just like your sicko perverted checkyoursauces channel writes the sickest most abusive lies about me.

    i've said humans are part of nature etc all along. as usual you think you can steal my soul and act like you are enlightened & correct.

    kill yourself scum

  • @sicktoaster - you need your fucking head kicked in you piece of shit lying sack of faggots. who the fuck do you think you are, posting such fucking lies about me and what i say and how i think, when my fucking channel/s and comments all make it uber fucking clear i'm nothing at all like what you wrote.

    it's cause of scum like you that all the good stuff is ignored or never implemented and society is so unsustainable and done all wrong.

    kill yourself you sick tarded spaz.

  • @sicktoaster - you're talking shit anyway on top of everything else. face reality moron, the dominant way of doing things is out of harmony with nature on fucking purpose. and you're clearly part of that satanic etc conspiracy or you wouldn't try to play down how bad things are. thinking you can apply tao to a situation like that....cunt it's done purposely out of harmony. that is how a virus/parasite keeps its host(this planet)unable to be healthy & in control of its own body. k.y.

  • 3 idiots , my god you are stupid.

  • This petition signed by 31K (now 32) "scientists" is BS. See youtube(dot)com/watch?v=Py2XVI­LHUjQ

  • China airlines refuse to pay EU carbon charge

    Chinese airlines will not pay a charge on carbon emissions imposed by the European Union from January 1

    "China, of course, will not cooperate with the European Union on the ETS (emissions trading scheme)," said Chai Haibo, deputy secretary-general of the China Air Transport Association, which represents the country's airlines.

    He said the Chinese government was considering "counter-measures" against the European Union

  • @RandomVersion - kill yourself you non-shinto non-taoist non-buddhist non-shamanic godless tarded schizo channel-cloning useless-eater - i know how your kind thinks maths works, that's how you really think things like adding works like. it's also the type of 'logic' (cause you have no logic) behind your insane delusional thoughts & opinions on humans effecting climate.

    china knows humans affect their environment. for 100000s of years.

    kill yourself.

  • @NWOareScum "non-shinto non-taoist non-buddhist non-shamanic godless tarded schizo channel-cloning useless-eater". You're not by any chance a qualified linguist, are you? I believe the climate sceptics could use some good linguistic services.

  • @bobinhk1 - why the fuck would i side with the scumfucks i hate more than anyone here.

    the cunt i posted that to is a climate-sceptic, see my comment before the one you replied to. the one in a style you decided to fucking copy after i wrote it.

  • @NWOareScum "the one in a style you decided to fucking copy after i wrote it". Gosh, I didn't realise it was you when I started copying it! Such a different style! You ARE a linguist, I knew it! Climate sceptics beware, here we come!

  • Comment removed

  • The amount of CO2 in the air influences the global temperature as the history of the earth shows.

    (For Americans: the world is older than 4000 years)

  • @baseballplayer1251 "(For Americans: the world is older than 4000 years)". 6000 years - they had a recount.

  • @baseballplayer1251 Wrong. You must be reading your graph up-side-down. Temperatures drive CO2