I think the point of this multi monitor technology is probably boaring more towards the high resolution display, rather then it being a "better alternative" to a large HDTV screen. I mean 5000 resolution is pretty amazing but then again, that is gonna be a right fps killer for alot of graphics cards, plus the monitor panel edges would get annoying in certain games.
It's good for other stuff but absolute pile of wank for gaming. Suppose to might be alright for gaming with certain ones. Also, easier n cheaper to get a projector.
I think the lines between the monitors is the worst thing.... if they could come up with a single panel of the same size and resoution then i'd get one... otherwise its like having a screen with several lines of dead pixels in the way...
The cost of this isent gunna be cheap and theres cheaper options you can get like Projectors and they take up less room then these screen(s) So i Would Pass pointless technology :(
In a few years those monitors will be worthless, maybe they will make single monitors with resolutions of the 6 who knows,
and the card he is talking about will be too.
It's a demonstration, they're not going to millions advertising it now, and no you can't get the same results from a projector as 6 x high resolution screens.
looks shit
muddieboi 1 year ago
i think i would prefer the bend screen much much mre
Newbpwng 1 year ago
I think the point of this multi monitor technology is probably boaring more towards the high resolution display, rather then it being a "better alternative" to a large HDTV screen. I mean 5000 resolution is pretty amazing but then again, that is gonna be a right fps killer for alot of graphics cards, plus the monitor panel edges would get annoying in certain games.
Nwovance 2 years ago
They're saying now that laptops will make desktops obsolete within the next 10 years.
AMD and ATI are also getting better than nVidia, apparently.
EddieTheFishReturns 2 years ago
yea the only reason that you would have a desktop in the near future would too only have a fucking super computer for power gaming graphics
dmanschaumbizzie 2 years ago
pointless just play on a 47 inch hd tv...or even better a 100 inch hd tv...
deckoh08 2 years ago
depends though sometimes tv's have horrendous lag
2xnkote 2 years ago
good idea, but for games is a 60-120'' TFT much betterm because there are not the black stripes vom the monitors.
in a fps or something like that its shit.
but a good idea^^
RazorSunjis 2 years ago
I'm gonna have to buy one now, just for the fact the guy demonstrating it looks like Skylar and he might kill me otherwise!
ScrewAttackEurope 2 years ago
it looks good but yeah - what's the point of this?
pofrani 2 years ago
whats the point in that? i want to view stuff without the frames of the monitor being in the way. just buy a HD projector or a big tv
bobjackson85 2 years ago
imagine the light bill lol
Just conect the pc to your 60 inch tv and you have a full image without being devided in 6 parts
niceboy60 2 years ago
think i'll stick with one monitor thanks
Griffo619 2 years ago
Advertisement FAIL
niiickniiickniiick 2 years ago 6
thats shit...
just shit
minglemonkey 2 years ago 2
its crap just get a 120" my uncle makes them
yell0p 2 years ago
And that can have a resolution of 5760x2400
I believe not.
DN94 2 years ago
or just get a 60" led lol
Crossitmax 2 years ago
It's good for other stuff but absolute pile of wank for gaming. Suppose to might be alright for gaming with certain ones. Also, easier n cheaper to get a projector.
mattybro88 2 years ago
What the hell!? it's crap!
Su1cidaLPancaKe 2 years ago
it looks shit
haha111p 2 years ago 2
I think the lines between the monitors is the worst thing.... if they could come up with a single panel of the same size and resoution then i'd get one... otherwise its like having a screen with several lines of dead pixels in the way...
carl0071 2 years ago
Yeah
xdipsterx 2 years ago
I agree with
abdelmoumen111
but i also agree with
EddieTheFishReturns
and
LoverofHuskys
The cost of this isent gunna be cheap and theres cheaper options you can get like Projectors and they take up less room then these screen(s) So i Would Pass pointless technology :(
jimmyoliboi 2 years ago
you cant compare a projector to 6 monitors
bigdima3 2 years ago
bigdima3 is right
eggzy43 2 years ago
I don't think everyone understands.
The video is to show what is possible "now".
In a few years those monitors will be worthless, maybe they will make single monitors with resolutions of the 6 who knows,
and the card he is talking about will be too.
It's a demonstration, they're not going to millions advertising it now, and no you can't get the same results from a projector as 6 x high resolution screens.
Pharosurreal 2 years ago
@jimmyoliboi
There isn't a cheap projector that can produce that many pixels and this is mainly for enthusiasts!
TowfiqTheBrown 2 years ago
I'm not American. I don't have money. I'm out.
EddieTheFishReturns 2 years ago
or just get a 1080p projector lol
LoverofHuskys 2 years ago 2
yeh i dont like the lines at all
thetobbit 2 years ago 5
sweet
abdelmoumen111 2 years ago
meh
gleneth00 2 years ago 3