Added: 3 years ago
From: thecocoking
Views: 115,737
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (158)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA WHAT A LOAD OF FUCKING BULLSHIT!!

  • Sounds just like the guy asking the questions....

  • While I'm not entirely convinced by the pictures that may or may not be of her jumping what is not shown here was the time Janet was given a powerful tranquilizer and sent to bed and soon after was found sleeping on top of a radio placed on the dresser. They even had photos of that taken and in some ways is more chilling then her supposedly jumping.

  • Thumbs up if you just saw Janet being interviewed on This Morning

  • "This Morning" SUCKS!!!!!!

  • there is going to be a movie :D

  • i wonder if this was the inspiration for "paranomal actvity"?

  • "Sceptics suggested that janet might simply be jumping"

    no shit lol

  • @Apocalyptism nobody can jump that far across a room mate, i've dealt with a poltergeist before, she was clearly thrown.

  • @stephxbones Sure they can. People are pretty amazing, beds are springy and paranormal investigators who are sufficiently prepared for such a lengthy investigation aren't going to use a camera when they have video cameras at their disposal. The girls were the focus of the phenomena and they didn't bother having a video camera on hand at all times? They didn't have one set up permanently in their bed room? BS. They're jumping. The voice was probably done by an investigator imo.

  • You know, you are trying to operate on a hypocritical level, bro. On the one hand, when you see an argument that you regard as weak, you hector and bully the person who made it. On the other hand, when you have your argument pulled completely destroyed, as I have done a couple of times now, you want to denigrate the person who does that as "pompous" and insecure. I'd say that your behaviour adds up to being pretty insecure when you look at it in that light.

  • @bmontg04 "When you have your argument completely destroyed"? You used peer review as a matter of fact which makes me roll my eyes. Peer review equates to getting a family member as a reference when filling out an employment application. You also referenced a garbage statistic - more eye rolling. Reason and content. Check. Keep the thesaurus handy, but it only makes you LOOK smart.

  • @burkemurphyable I was using the term "peer reviewed" in an academic context, meaning that academics have read and critiqued the work of other academics. The term has become a short-hand for saying that the text holds up to scrutiny. Family members don't quite count, buddy, unless they happen to contribute to academic publications. I'm going to bail now, because you are not up to the task here, and I should be paid for this tuition.

  • @bmontg04 Which, incidentally, helps to illustrate my initial point quite nicely. Many thanks for that. Now others can read this sequence of exchanges and see the very thing that I was highlighting unfold before them. Right wingers have less obligation to be well informed.

  • @bmontg04 "The error rate for wikipedia has been found to be 4 in 100" who decides these "error rates"? i'm glad you did leave, because in your small mind, incapable of thinking outside the small academic box mind you have decided you are correct. Right Wingers...you don't know jack. i let go of the silly left/right paradigm years ago, and i feel sorry for you. i'm sorry i hurt your feelings by belittling your beloved wikipedia.

  • @bmontg04 you missed the analogy - peer review means squat when they are all from the same "school" of thought. A family reference means squat when they are family, and will likely say good things about the applicant.

  • @burkemurphyable You are a child, or at least argue like one. I can see how endless this could be. For the record, many academics are in competition, not in collusion. Academia is international, not from one "family". You are a moron.

  • people who cite wikipedia as source material are RETARDED.

  • @burkemurphyable Do your homework, bud. Encyclopedia Britannica, an internationally respected reference at academic level has been found to have an error rate of 2 in 100. The error rate for wikipedia has been found to be 4 in 100, which is not too shabby. No reference source is infallible. There are myriad peer reviewed texts that extol the virtues of wikipedia as a reference. Try basing your arguments in reason and content, and not in mindless claims and personal insults.

  • @bmontg04 using big words makes you sound pompous and not so confident, you mad bro?

  • @burkemurphyable Once again, you need to work on your critical literacy skills. Far from being "mad" or agitated, I relish the opportunity to inform misguided would-be cyber bullies like you. Being better informed and educated than you are does not make me pompous. Why am I obliged to operate at your level? Then there would be two idiots, instead of one. You are starting to watch the man, and not the ball. I'd say that was quite insecure, wouldn't you?

  • reminds me of the excorist

  • I honestly believe that some of the activity is actually genuine, but some of it is obviously faked by the girls and copied the genuine phenomena, as with the voice, i'm not entirely convinced, when i was a boy i did a voice very simuler to that when i was pretending to be a dalek!

  • if you see the documentary and you see part 2

    you would think it is a lego commercial haha unbelieveble how many times they say LEGO

  • Judging by the amount of kids she has, I bet the father is haunted too. By the CSA probably.

  • Lol

  • haha so funny

  • Shut up!

  • @sharjes84 haha

  • Do you know your dead....'shat up'  the only way is Enfield :p

  • Check wiki these bitches came out in 2004 and ADMITED it was a hoax

  • @hairgel5 wikipedia is a load of shite and cannot be trusted... it is edited by people who voice their own opinions so not all of it is fact...

  • THE ENTIRE "HAUNTING" BUSINESS WAS A HOAX, JUST LIKE THE AMITYVILLE THING.

    THE WOMEN WHO WERE SUPPOSEDLY AFFECTED BY THE HAUNTING ADMITTED FAKING MOST OF THE EVIDENCE TO ATTRACT THE MEDIA. WHEN THE GIRLS GREW UP THEY ACKNOWLEDGED THE ENTIRE THING AS A HOAX.

  • @kztar621 that is not so

    i saw an interview with one of the girls now a woman and she did not say it was a hoax

    get your facts right

  • @kztar621 Where is the documentation that this case was an admitted hoax? My mum has worked with the policewoman who in 1977 saw a chair moving around by itself in that house. So now the police were lying were they? In a recent interview a few years ago the women did NOT claim it was a hoax. The girls Did say that sometimes they got bored and threw objects - however they - and the other adult witnesss - have made it very clear - the vast majority of the incidents happened.

  • OMG LOL I JUST SHAT MY SELF THE BUTTON THAT OPENS THE DVD THING JUST OPEND DIDNT RELISE I PRESSED IT LOL

  • bullshit! i could make this voice when i was 10 too...almost every child can do that...

  • @plasticboy81 for hours?

  • @greenelf12

    wheres the proof, that she made it for hours? i can only hear like one minute...im not impressed.

  • @plasticboy81 I agree, i for one did a very simuler voice when i was a boy, pretending to be a dalek!

  • Pretty silly - no video apart from the ridiculous re-enactment with a more telegenic little girl. The attempt to pass off stills of the kid CLEARLY jumping off her bed as evidence of supernatural activity is utterly laughable.

  • @RichRobust

    James Randi visited the news publisher that had sent the photographer to take the pictures. He asked for the contact sheet for the film roll used to take the pictures. In that roll there were several pictures of her getting ready to jump (since timing the jump with the snapshot is hard).

  • I find this hard to fap to.

  • The notion that she was creating the voice was dispelled when the investigators had her hold water in her mouth and they taped her mouth shut, yet the voice still emerged just as before. That should quiet the doubters.

  • @MOREHARTH

    The investigators can hardly be called that. She was caught moving stuff herself, and the photographer of the stills wasn't allowed to watch when taking the pictures (he had to close his eyes and wait for the signal to snap a picture). She ran the show.

  • its possible she would have overheard a conversation between her mother and a neighbour talking about the previous occupant of their house.if someone had died in your house and you were chatting to one of your neighbours wouldnt they mention the dead persons name and how and where they died in your house? This is simply a case of a kid knowing too much and adults who should know better being fooled.lets also not forget a Tabloid journalist was involved, and we all know how trustworthy they are!

  • What a bunch of bullshit hahahahah

  • its real i think it is because it is imposible to use you voice cords like that

  • @gabby1234567ful

    It's surprisingly easy. Have you never heard of goregrind etc? Lots of people can SING like that never mind talk.

  • At one point the voice uses the word "dumb" to mean stupid which is an Americanism. I doubt an old man in 1977 would have used this word in that context.Sounds more like a word used by a teenage girl who watches too many American programmes.

  • this aint even funny i live near this house :/

  • @fcinghell imagine if bills comes to your house :O

  • @hargohargo2 DUDE!!! I'm aware it is an actress. There's another doco on this which is good, if you like this check that out. Can't remember what it's called but it's in the related videos. And YES the girl was possessed. In the past year I have read up a bit on this, and sadly the whole incident as really fucked up the family involved. I have no doubt that something happened to this poor girl. However, she has even admitted that sometimes they would fake things to keep Morris there.

  • This is real! DO YOU HEAR ME? REAL!!!!!!

  • Fool letting that thing lead him to believe it was once a human being who died

  • @hargohargo2 I know that but this video is claiming it is actual footage.

  • My cousin showed me this and I shit myself but after watching it a gain I recon

    Its a load of bull shit

  • "Skeptics suggest that Janet may simply be jumping", you think?

  • @Revanchist12 no way does a person jump like that. I have seen that happen to and the person was POSSESSED without a doubt possessed.

  • THis scared the pants off me ...... Yu can tell it was real how freaked out is she is >scariest video I have ever seen !!

  • There was no actual footage.

    It's all bollocks.

    This is a reconstruction!!

  • It's the same type of gravelly voice as the Real Exorcism of Anneliese Michel

    I'm 50/50 on the Enfield case, they had audio and stills but no concrete video of her levitating or the objects moving around in the house, They said video camera batteries depleted etc. It's either a brilliant hoax or an unexplained mystery.

  • @oldmcbran he said hemorrhage, not hemorroids lol!

  • One of my Aunties' Married into the family before all of this happened. They witnessed some of the strange phenomona that occured. Till this day, I remember when she told me about the chairs in the house moving on there & I didn't believe it. Its only now I believe after reading ang watching proper docu's on it. If im correct, I think even after it stopped all of the family had lots of 'bad luck' for many years after.

  • @CeeCeeKnight Is Janet ok? I saw this same 'levitation' in an ex that was possessed.

  • I live down the road from where this happened.

  • @jenwasverydrunk

    Me too, all this is real, the most genuine case you will find.

  • Comment removed

  • this isn't the actual video, it is a reconstruction created by ITV. He never said brain haemorrage, just haemorrage and it's spelt haemorrage not hemerage. The child Levitated not levetated. BTW possessed is spelty possessed and not posessed. But surprisingly you managed to spell poltereist correctly. Did you fail English grammar GCSE?

  • @rocksoliddude1Before you start giving grammar lessons, maybe you should get some of your own.

    First of all, it's hemorrhage not haemorrage. You also NEVER start a sentence with a conjunction. Your entire comment is hypocritical.

  • Comment removed

  • CHECK OUT THE VERY SCARY "THE UNWELCOME" Based on the true events of the Enfield Poltergeist

  • absolutely hilarious. i can't get enough. but why anyone would actually take this seriously makes me worry for the state of our race.

  • This isnt the original, this is a remake for a tv show, the orginal was never video'd on recorded on tapes.

  • Does that sound like a little girls voice?

    No, it sounds like Dierdrie off Coronation Street.

  • That ghost sounds an awful lot like the tree of temptation.

  • My name is Michael Caine, and I, am a nosey neighbour!

  • You don't mess with the Bill ghost......

  • I live in enfield :| x

  • It's so sad what happend to that family. It was the last they ever needed.

    ~*~

  • I know Janet, there's still something with her - she's a lovely woman and didn't seserve all this

  • Does anyone else hear that the 2 voices of the interviewer and the ghost from :40 to :50 are the same? they couldnt hire another actor? LOLOLZ!

  • @Tinamoonie1902 did you really go to school with her ?.....if so what did everyone at school think about this whole polterguist thing ?

  • MY NAMES BILL

  • PMSL At The HaHa

  • The actual doc is on here, it's called 'Interview with a Poltergeist' - freaked me right out ha ha!

  • wow how hard is it to do tht voice, NOT. i can do tht easyy

  • haha :)):)):))

  • Where's derek acorah when you need him!

  • This isn't the proper recording. This is a recreation....

    Oh. Ha! Sorry, just as I'm typing this the proper recording comes on at 1:50.

    Still though, really wish I could find the proper interview!

  • those voices are pretty unexplainable if you get were im coming from

  • The girl in the video isnt the girl from the case!!! (Janet) the video is a reconstruction!!! And the voice was projected from the back of Janets head not the front!

  • true :P

  • she doesn't move her tonque, otherwise you will see it on her throat.

    and her throat isn't moving at all.

    the poltergeist is actually speaking right from the girls mouth. a kind of being possesed.

  • Comment removed

  • try doing the voice for over 3 hours becaause thats what the recording was its impossable.

  • @fin38 im in a metalcore band so i know what you mean about screaming but there is no way a 11 year old girl makes a voice like that nope sir no way

  • @fin38 But how would you explain how the voice was still recorded, even when they filled Janet's mouth with water and taped over her mouth ?

  • @fin38 please dont take this as an offence but you are slightly miss led in what you are saying or believe..It is fairly easy too replicate the sound as this i agree totally but when you try to put the sentence together in quick vocals it is almost impossible to do with letters like..P.., without moving your lips, even for the best ventruiloquist like the legend Dan Horn

  • @azshaw123 Your right I'm wrong.

  • @fin38

    you got to think though, your also 16 not 11, she may have not even hit puberty yet, i know when i was 11 i couldn't produce that voice

  • sebastian, its called "Interview With A Poltergeist" and i think there is six parts, it was an hour programme on UK television a few years ago. Look in the related video's on the right, its in there...quite recent.

  • this footage is a reconstruction on Uk about the Enfield poltergeist, there is actual footage of Janet speaking really gruff and tape recordings of things being thrown....

  • oh really? can you give me the internetlinks where i can watch it or listen to it?

    thanks

  • Is enybody knows address of this house?

  • Fake title is fake. There is no actual video footage from the original haunting here.

  • it is a recreation of the scene with actors. they used the actual voice. it is called editing.

  • "Enfield Poltergeist ACTUAL VIDEO"

    So you don't think the above title intimates recorded visual footage of actual poltergeist activity?

  • Ghetto and frenchie your fucking lives are a waste off time, it would be better if you didnt exist, no1 cares about you , you adopted piece of shits

  • haha it sounds like kennith kannif. from conn.

  • yeah im a wannabe, ive looked at ur profile ur a pete doherty fan and a complete penis, have a look at my picture cos i can tell u now that u wudnt say shit to me, i cud bench press u an all ur mates, wanna be, ha i bet i could beat the shit out of u with my hands behind my back

    u fuckin soppy cunt

    uve been owned, just like your mums pussy to anyone with a fiver

  • lool keyboard warrior alert. spotty little twat. you off school for half term? does your mum know your on the internet?

  • frenchi and ghetto get the fuck off my video you sad bunch of CUNTS. if u wanna argue, go shag each others mums cause i couldnt give a rats anal rectum.

  • your a total fanny

  • If you see the actual footage on the doc u can see she's sooooo faking it. You can tell cos her lips are moving

  • this video is bollocks, watch the one posted by whealsilver- enfield poltergeist 1-6

  • shut up you retard. you from the ghetto mate yeah? lool fucking mug

  • frenchie, ur obviously a fuckin cock, jog on u simple twat, ur dads a mug u waste of life

  • your obviously very intellegent. so ghetto boy what hood you from? loool are you sik ye? wannabe twat

  • Comment removed

  • i can put that voice on. its easy lol not saying its not true but it dosnt prove fuckall. il never beleive till i see a ghost

  • if u think that that little girl with those big ass teeth can put that voice on then your on crack, watch enfield poltergiest 1 6

    all parts, a lot more compelling than this one, something definately happened there, it ruined janets life, she's mentally scarred, so dont chat shit when you dont know shit

  • Do you think Maurice Grosse's recently deceased ( in 1977)daughter had anything to do with it? (wasn't the first bit of the book all about 10 or 20 coincidences Grosse experienced?) Have you started hearing bumps around the house in the night yet? ☼

  • you mean the daughter who was killed in the bike accident while working in cardiff? Cant see it to be honest. Why start haunting a random house in london? think the coincidences just refered to the run up to the story. Although i find it a bit odd that guy lyon playfair was reluctant to get involved, then all of a sudden he cant leave the property!!! i always hear bumps in the night-i live in a haunted house, but as of yet its not lobbed anything at me..still first time for everything!!! lol.

  • i need more on this..

  • I think they've re-printed the book about the Enfield poltergeist... 'This House is Haunted' by Guy Lyon Playfair'. I remember reading it and having to sleep with the light on for 6 monhs!

  • ive just bought the book, i see its dedicated to morris grosse. im looking forward to reading it. although i aint lookin forward to the electric bill if im gunna be sleeping with the light on!!!

  • haha! I was a 'living at home freeloading teenager' at the time. get one of those low voltage plug things from mothercare☺

  • lol, ive just reached page 67, and im resisting the urge to hug the light switch so far, however i find myself locking up my red slippers for fear of them chucking themselves around the bedroom at me!!!

    good book so far!

  • 0:12 - Thub!

  • maybe janet is smoking....JUST LIKE ME :)...!

  • A classic case!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more