Added: 1 year ago
From: ae911truth
Views: 2,569
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Det finns en mycket intressant intervju med Aaron Russo angående attackerna den 11 september översatt till svenska här watch?v=h091kMDXvDA

    Det är också intressant att se hur den officiella konspirationsteorin planterades i massmedia redan under den första timmen efter attacken watch?v=12z1ch6fWbE

  • This was debunked years ago...

  • @Singharz

    It have never been debunked, just because it's not possible to debunk it. You mean that it has been ignored for years. That is true.

  • If a higher percentage of the general population had something resembling a scientific background, the 9/11 scam would have been exposed long ago.

  • @Jackthesmilingblack And what's your scientific background, pray tell?

  • @Jackthesmilingblack if the general public would just broke their indoctrination and started thinking for themselfs instead of just listening to what the corrupt media and goverment is telling them, they would damand the whole bush-administration, NIST and FEMA put on trail for treason, acts of terrorism and the destruction of evidence. It all fits to well in their plan for the NWO

  • Nanothermite is only available from US and Israeli above top secret military labs.

    There were no Arabs on the 4 911 airliners. The Planes were hijacked electronically by the Commnad Transmitter system from SPC whose CEO was Rabbi Dov Zakheim.

    Google "No Arabs On The 4 Hijacked 911 Airliners"

    Google this too: Click Search Videos then enter "Dr. Alan Sabrosky Traitors in our Government Allegiance to Israel"

  • For what it's worth: Watson and Crick finagled their first paper into Nature without the usual peer review because they were afraid of being scooped by Erwin Chargaff. A chemist named Jerry Donohue gave them the bond length data they needed and they rushed into publication because they knew Chargaff would get the bond lengths by the grapevine.

  • More and more people know that 911 was assisted/planned to happen

    Great vid

  • Yeah, SayYourSorry, Your "ham-handed" misdirect does you little credit. You know very well what Harrit said. For you to blather merrily on with completely dishonest over-simplifications puts you directly in the complicity camp.

    We can hear very well what Harrit says and we can also see and deduce for ourselves that (over all your nonsense about unqualified observers and investigations) Harrit is immensely qualified to speak on this very subject.

    You are not.

    How did they get to you ?

  • Israel will engineer another big false flag for its middle east conquest and this time it is very likely a nuke attack on USA and Israel will have excuse to retaliate on Arab country with Nuke as an act of revenge on the supposed terrorist nuke attack on USA.The news media planted the news on nuke attack threat by AlciaDA many times already. So when the real thing happen the average people will buy the official story again. Israel will then attack on Arab countries and Palestine.Stay awake!!

  • THANK YOU SO MUCH!! i REALLY IMPORTANT VIDEO HWO CHANGS EVERYTHING FOR THE SLEEPERS!

  • Be very afraid of your masters . 911 may be used as a excuse for the U.N to come in and "fix things " . We the people will pay war crimes tax like the Germans have to .

  • Let's be honest, Neils Harrit found evidence of aluminum and iron oxide in the dust samples he claims are from the WTCs. Saying he "discovered nanothermite" is a stretch.

  • @unRompecabezas They have samples from all the buildings . Many from 1st responders . google

    Captain Karin Deshore NYC EMT and read what happened . That was from a BLAST not sound waves .

  • There are terrible criminals living among us, that feel confident they've gotten away with their crime.

    I gives me a "creepy" feeling, like sleeping in a house where mass murder was committed ... but you didn't find out until you moved away.

  • Q: If we look at the most telling WTC evidence; do we observe a "collapse due to fire & structural damage"?

    Consecutive progressive stacking, crumbling materials until energy dissipates?

    A: No,

    But what we DO see is two giant skyscrapers and the entirety of it's contents pulverized to dust & micro particles from topside-down, rapid thermal expansion, much of it literally floats away before actually touching the ground.

    Powdered Building = EVIDENCE

    What idiot said they saw "Pancakes ™" ??

  • Niels Harrit's work hasn't stood up very well to professional scrutiny. He had it published in a not-particularly-reputable journal that later published a computer-generated nonsense article, which attests to the standards of their selection process. And there's no clear chain of custody for the samples he used in his research, so no one's really sure where this dust came from.

  • @unRompecabezas Always wonted to know, how is life as a shill?

    You should be ashamed of yourself.

  • @unRompecabezas Shall I remind you we can all say the SAME things about your Mom??

    Tell me now, when it slips clean in one ear and out the other without registering does it make any difference how highly credentialed the messenger is?

    Or doth the message offend thee?

    Did you question the fabricated evidence of the 'officially sanctioned & authorized 9/11 mythos'?

    How bout when they get caught in the act several times?

    How does trusting professional liars make any logical sense?

  • @GnosticNinja "Shall I remind you we can all say the SAME things about your Mom??"

    No need. But the next time you wonder why anyone would think truthers lack civility, just remember that comment, okay?

    Thanks.

  • @unRompecabezas "No clear chain of custody" If you mean the samples were not gathered by law enforcement, you are right. However, there is a section of the paper explaining "provenance".

    Someone who harps on this issue after reading the paper seems more like a defense attorney than a man eager to find the truth. Of course the paper could NEVER have been published in a "real" journal. No editor could have kept his job after accepting it. So...keep the info unpublished or publish wherever?

  • the criminals blew it up to dispose of evidence that could incriminate them for theft.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more