there is no way our current explanation of the moons orbit is correct, anyway you slice it there is another force at work, the free fall explanation requires a force to maintain it against gravity for the said 4.5 billion years, this goes against the laws of physics as we know them, also they admit this force when they say tittle bulging boosts the moons orbit, google planet near death.
@NotBadYeah think of it, the moon affects the ocean(water)...we are 90% water...don't you think that we are affected by the moon, since we are 90% water ? of course it does :-)
@NotBadYeah hi, yes the moon and the sun affects everything on earth, even the earths crust. that 9.81 value is measured on earth, so it is affected by the moon and sun already. only very sensitive devices can measure the difference when the moon and sun change positions (which they constantly do).
@evvert00 Thanks a lot :D , Sorry, I had been drinking when I asked this question. But you have cleared some stuff up for me! English is my second language, even though I am Australian, I hope you can understand what I'm saying.
This is completly wrong. The truth is when Chuck Norris gets on the water its high tide, when he gets out its low tide. (He has a strict scheduel) You fools, you realy thought it was the moon :p pleas :p
I just have one question: If the moon affects the water in the oceans thus lifting them up to create 'high tides' then why doesn't that same gravitational pull affect us. After all we are made up of a large percentage of water. Why aren't we lifted up or at least stretched when the moon is nearby?
comparing the mass of the moon and of an average human being, our mass is relatively small compared to that of the oceans as the Law of Gravitation [ F= (Gm1m2)/r^2] suggests. therefore, there is still attraction but its not as obvious like that in the oceans because also of the fact that they do not have a definite volume and shape (liquid). Furthermore, humans are (usually) in the land, not on the oceans, the same reason why your lakes and rivers do not have tides...
this is proof that modern science is a load if jizz. The moon has no such drastic effect on earths water. If you are a smart ass then see that the water formation is linked to the earths magnetic field and the moon is also attached to that hence why it always faces earth
@cjellwood : have you ever seen water being attracted by a magnet, dear smart ass? What a stupid reasoning are you giving? The explanation is perfectly correct, otherwise why on fullmoon and newmoon days the height of the tides are more?
@cjellwood I don't get what you are trying to drive at. But according to Newtons Law, No matter how far two objects away from each other, there will definitely be an attractive force between them which diminishes as 1/r^2 where r is the distance between them. If you think there is some other cause for the tides than the Moon's & Sun's gravitational attractive force on water on earth then the height of the tides should be independent of the position of the Moon and the Sun which is not true.
@cjellwood If some material is to be attracted by a magnet then it should have the property of getting polarized when subjected to a magnetic filed. It means it will turn into a magnet in a magnetic field. Otherwise it won't respond to a magnet. Iron is that kind of a material whereas water is not and therefore magnetic force won't have any appreciable effect on water. I have given sufficient explanation and still if you wish to argue, I am not going to care.
There's a mountain of evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked. I posted a partial summary of it on a science forum. Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th post from the top.
People who still think they went to the moon simply haven't seen the hoax evidence yet.
the highest tides called spring tides and the lowest tides called neap tides
cutypie876 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
there is no way our current explanation of the moons orbit is correct, anyway you slice it there is another force at work, the free fall explanation requires a force to maintain it against gravity for the said 4.5 billion years, this goes against the laws of physics as we know them, also they admit this force when they say tittle bulging boosts the moons orbit, google planet near death.
jocell202 3 months ago
VERY GOOD
AwaisButtSony 5 months ago
theres a mistake at 2:55 it says: first high tide and second high tide...isnt it ment to be: first high tide and second low tide????
wanafag 5 months ago
Comment removed
wanafag 5 months ago
If the moon is able to affect the ocean does that mean it also has an effect on us? Is gravity less than 9.81m/s when the moon's taken into account?
NotBadYeah 8 months ago
@NotBadYeah think of it, the moon affects the ocean(water)...we are 90% water...don't you think that we are affected by the moon, since we are 90% water ? of course it does :-)
THEJESSICAVILLE 5 months ago
@NotBadYeah hi, yes the moon and the sun affects everything on earth, even the earths crust. that 9.81 value is measured on earth, so it is affected by the moon and sun already. only very sensitive devices can measure the difference when the moon and sun change positions (which they constantly do).
evvert00 4 months ago
@evvert00 Thanks a lot :D , Sorry, I had been drinking when I asked this question. But you have cleared some stuff up for me! English is my second language, even though I am Australian, I hope you can understand what I'm saying.
NotBadYeah 4 months ago
HAhahaha whatching this in school
aleman224 10 months ago
This is completly wrong. The truth is when Chuck Norris gets on the water its high tide, when he gets out its low tide. (He has a strict scheduel) You fools, you realy thought it was the moon :p pleas :p
gambiatzu 1 year ago
Bill O reilly needs to watch this video
HardBodyNyC 1 year ago 19
I just have one question: If the moon affects the water in the oceans thus lifting them up to create 'high tides' then why doesn't that same gravitational pull affect us. After all we are made up of a large percentage of water. Why aren't we lifted up or at least stretched when the moon is nearby?
vidfann 1 year ago
comparing the mass of the moon and of an average human being, our mass is relatively small compared to that of the oceans as the Law of Gravitation [ F= (Gm1m2)/r^2] suggests. therefore, there is still attraction but its not as obvious like that in the oceans because also of the fact that they do not have a definite volume and shape (liquid). Furthermore, humans are (usually) in the land, not on the oceans, the same reason why your lakes and rivers do not have tides...
iamphaige 1 year ago
Wtf it's in B/W and there is no sound
1996maxmillion 1 year ago
@1996maxmillion welcome to the 1950'a
J4M3SPR 1 year ago
neop mr. Dentice
ray10xxx 1 year ago
LOL, who taught you to read and type? You're really a trained chimp I bet.
mccabe1958 1 year ago
this is proof that modern science is a load if jizz. The moon has no such drastic effect on earths water. If you are a smart ass then see that the water formation is linked to the earths magnetic field and the moon is also attached to that hence why it always faces earth
DUH
cjellwood 2 years ago
@cjellwood : have you ever seen water being attracted by a magnet, dear smart ass? What a stupid reasoning are you giving? The explanation is perfectly correct, otherwise why on fullmoon and newmoon days the height of the tides are more?
kjayadev2007 1 year ago
@kjayadev2007 have you ever seen a magnet on fire with another magnet orbiting it?
cjellwood 1 year ago
@cjellwood I don't get what you are trying to drive at. But according to Newtons Law, No matter how far two objects away from each other, there will definitely be an attractive force between them which diminishes as 1/r^2 where r is the distance between them. If you think there is some other cause for the tides than the Moon's & Sun's gravitational attractive force on water on earth then the height of the tides should be independent of the position of the Moon and the Sun which is not true.
kjayadev2007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kjayadev2007 ....Chuck Norris causes the tides by doing press ups....fact...
HOMEnHIGH 11 months ago
@cjellwood If some material is to be attracted by a magnet then it should have the property of getting polarized when subjected to a magnetic filed. It means it will turn into a magnet in a magnetic field. Otherwise it won't respond to a magnet. Iron is that kind of a material whereas water is not and therefore magnetic force won't have any appreciable effect on water. I have given sufficient explanation and still if you wish to argue, I am not going to care.
kjayadev2007 1 year ago
thank u
one love :)
createrainbowz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
While we're on the subject of the moon--
There's a mountain of evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked. I posted a partial summary of it on a science forum. Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th post from the top.
People who still think they went to the moon simply haven't seen the hoax evidence yet.
Cosmored 2 years ago
very informative
DrParmesan 2 years ago