@Sinfoniette The question is: is a more sensitive interpretation better for this piece? I like to hear Bach's music played in time and with more masculine energy, as opposed to this "sensitive" version that is played with more feminine energy. I like the way that Giels plays the faster section, but not the rubato that he uses in the first 5 minutes. Gould's version is MUCH more lively! If we were discussing an interpretaion of Chopin's music, I would suggest the opposite approach, "rubato".
@Sinfoniette Whether you prefer this interpretation, or not, it is obvious that it is a slower, more somber, melancholic version. And that is not a critcism, but a comparative analysis that I felt compelled to make after becoming accustomed to hearing Gould's livlier version.One only needs a pair of ears and a discriminating brain to hear the "reason" in commenting on the marked difference between the two interpretations.
@ Ravel...I have a cat, his name is Molotov, he is a communist. He enjoys donuts; we go to Tim Horton's and share one occasionally. In spite ot his political leanings I enjoy his company, and he seems to appreciate Bach. He does not like Beethoven however, and will leave the room when I play some on the piano. But he will sit next to me when I play Bach. I will have little use for him when after he dies, so I can send him to you then.
Maybe it is the interpretation differences between then and now. Now it seems people prefer a lively articulation to mimic the harpsichord sound, and a faster speed. The suggesting speed of allemande on today's book is 88 for quarter notes, which is nearly twice as this speed.
@pianofolle I also think it sounds intimate and expressive. I believe that this interpretation sounds sad and pensive compared to the life and energy that Gould puts into this piece. There are many different forms of expression. Giels plays it rubato, like a Chopin interpretation. To me, Gould's time feel exposes the magic of Bach's counterpoint and the independence of the melodic lines more than this version. All comments are opinions, including yours and "others".
@KABRIS1 I've heard many people say that. I very much respect his work on Bach but I can't really understand people who would find Gilels' Bach dull after Gould. Gilels playing is much more sensitive than Gould's here, I think...
wow. how slowly he plays it. compare it to walter giseking. both are great. there is no one way
sukkot54 5 months ago
@Sinfoniette The question is: is a more sensitive interpretation better for this piece? I like to hear Bach's music played in time and with more masculine energy, as opposed to this "sensitive" version that is played with more feminine energy. I like the way that Giels plays the faster section, but not the rubato that he uses in the first 5 minutes. Gould's version is MUCH more lively! If we were discussing an interpretaion of Chopin's music, I would suggest the opposite approach, "rubato".
KABRIS1 6 months ago
@KABRIS1 I respect your opinion, I just didn't like how you just said it was dull compared to Gould with not much reason. That's all to it.
Sinfoniette 6 months ago
@Sinfoniette Whether you prefer this interpretation, or not, it is obvious that it is a slower, more somber, melancholic version. And that is not a critcism, but a comparative analysis that I felt compelled to make after becoming accustomed to hearing Gould's livlier version.One only needs a pair of ears and a discriminating brain to hear the "reason" in commenting on the marked difference between the two interpretations.
KABRIS1 6 months ago
@KABRIS1 I like having many different interpretations to enjoy.
brono25 5 months ago
@brono25 That is your right. I do as well but some I like better than others, because of musical considerations that the music itself implies.
KABRIS1 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KABRIS1 I like having many different interpretations to enjoy.
brono25 5 months ago
good cover keep on rocking
daniiiiiii68 7 months ago
@ Ravel...I have a cat, his name is Molotov, he is a communist. He enjoys donuts; we go to Tim Horton's and share one occasionally. In spite ot his political leanings I enjoy his company, and he seems to appreciate Bach. He does not like Beethoven however, and will leave the room when I play some on the piano. But he will sit next to me when I play Bach. I will have little use for him when after he dies, so I can send him to you then.
buffuzo 7 months ago
too slow but great holdings
kevinrapper10 10 months ago
Maybe it is the interpretation differences between then and now. Now it seems people prefer a lively articulation to mimic the harpsichord sound, and a faster speed. The suggesting speed of allemande on today's book is 88 for quarter notes, which is nearly twice as this speed.
wclmyy 1 year ago
After hearing Gould's version, this sounds dull and lifeless.
KABRIS1 1 year ago
@KABRIS1 To you, maybe. To me and others it sounds very intimate and expressive.
pianofolle 6 months ago
@pianofolle I also think it sounds intimate and expressive. I believe that this interpretation sounds sad and pensive compared to the life and energy that Gould puts into this piece. There are many different forms of expression. Giels plays it rubato, like a Chopin interpretation. To me, Gould's time feel exposes the magic of Bach's counterpoint and the independence of the melodic lines more than this version. All comments are opinions, including yours and "others".
KABRIS1 6 months ago
@KABRIS1 I've heard many people say that. I very much respect his work on Bach but I can't really understand people who would find Gilels' Bach dull after Gould. Gilels playing is much more sensitive than Gould's here, I think...
Sinfoniette 6 months ago
Wow. He actually plays it how it was written. Unlike Gould. With Gould's speed in the Allemande, imagine the Courante!!
buzzflydunbother 1 year ago
He is the double of Jimmy Carr!!! Playing of the highest order too!
kingsfort1 1 year ago
Thanks for helping me on my piano exam!
Dragondude2218 1 year ago 2
Strange. I prefer this over Gould's. :O
Ravel87 1 year ago 7
@Ravel87 Thank god. I would prefer a dead cat over Gould's ghastly destruction of Bach
MuscleDaddyCMH 9 months ago
@Ravel87 Here´s one more!;)
metteholm75 7 months ago
A bit slower than the Gould version I am used to, but a nice interpretation nonetheless
ixcuincle 2 years ago 2
This is weird.
But I like it.
juliusrain 2 years ago
Bravé!!!
takhirviolinest 2 years ago
Thank you for Sharing !
BPanther 2 years ago
Comment removed
Sravakayana 3 years ago
Absolument superbe !
Des phrasés magiques, comme suspendus à l'éternité !
J'adore!!!!
philippelouis69 3 years ago 3
Wonderful. I love Emil Gilels. Beautiful playing. So simple and natural, with lovely balance and sympathy.
Thanks a lot, Sinfoniette.
lecochonbleu 3 years ago 11
This is beautiful... thank you for uploading! :)
kh495 3 years ago