Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
Topics: The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
or
figure4etc3.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
Where did the records come from on Euclid? Man god, or God? Can you trust the source 100% as to bet your life on it? You say you have yet to see any evidence on God. Really? Where is the evidence that there is no God? How do you know without a doubt that what you read or see is true? It was 90 degrees here today. How do I prove that without a shadow of a doubt to those in the future 2-3,00 years from now? Read the news or turn on a television. Everyday events are changed, distorted, & lied about
If God himself came down today and proved himself for all the world to see, would there be anything anyone could do to prove it to those who will doubt his existence 2,000 years in the future?
@squeak111974 We have records of math problems being solved by Euclid, about 2500 years ago. If God would appear, we would know, don't worry. Since we have yet to see any evidence at all, we'll just assume he doesnt not exist. Now the question goes back to you. If another god was to descend and show himself, would you believe in it, knowing that you had been wrong your whole life? Being atheist, I would change my mind.
@HateFieldLies -you've already got sufficient proof to believe. Israel must be a nation in the end or the Bible is false. It wasn't a nation for over 2,000 years. Today it is one. Jerusalem must be divided in the end, or the Bible's wrong. It's divided into Christian, Jewish, Muslim quarters. People don't believe because they don't want to.
@Drecon84 If you were to die and say "God, you hid yourself", he might say,"Ever heard of the Jesus?" he could also mention that in order to know if the New Testament is based in fact, you would need for Israel to become a nation, Jerusalem to be divided, the world to lack faith in God, crazy weather, and all in close proximety. Then he can say,"oh yeah, it all lined up at the same period of history, hid myself? No not really." seek and u shall find. Atheists don't wanna seek.
@Drecon84 We don't know God's judgement of anyone. We can't judge him for something we know nothing about. We don't even know what Hell is literally, nor do we know who goes there. For all we know this is Hell. We have no idea. It's all speculation. To judge God on this issue is like accusing your wife of cheating when she hasn't, but saying "you were going to and I know it."
@Drecon84 You say evidence elsewhere. Well you've got three predominate spreading religions as of now. Islam, which came long after Christ and preaches specifically against Christ actually fulfilling Biblical prophecy of a false prophet and false religion in the end. Christ centered beliefs, love your enemy, do unto others, etc. And finally Atheism which fulfills Biblical prophecy of men turning from faith in God in the end. It actually all sets up nicely with what the Bible describes.
@iworkforme God created science much like a programmer designs the rules of a video game. From the Christian perspective, there's nothing scary about science.
Sir Richard. You have taught me how to think. For that I am grateful. I have had the fortune, with my uneducated attempt at reasoning, to watch christian's running away from me. I hope it's because I suggested that their "science based" rebuttals require more than the answer I could offer and that if i did consult with an actual scientist that they must be prepared to debate fact much further. They all become poopy lipped and resentful quite quickly.
@BlackHalo28 -the Sims can't prove you do or do not exist. It's circular reasoning to say God does or doesn't exist. I think God sets life and death before people, and says, "you choose. I'm not going to force myself on you but here I am." Dawkins throws science around as a reason to reject God. Science has actually helped my faith. There are many possibilities that differ from Atheism. I offered alternate theories. Abiogenesis is a theory. Simulated reality is a theory.
Dawkins believes in the big bang and abiogenesis but gives no thought on what's outside the universe. He also gives no regard to the theory that there could be someone outside the universe that knows something that we do not.
@Mossinator5000Deluxe Even if you would be right, then this must be a real cruel god to spread evidence for other theories everywhere. He hides himself really well and then tortures anyone that cannot find him for eternity. Not the kind of god that I could ever believe in.
If this were like the matrix, those in the matrix know nothing about what's outside the matrix. They would be ignorant to how things were outside the matrix, and if they said they weren't in a matrix reality, they would be wrong. Their laws of physics and science would be programmed and would apply nowhere outside of the matrix.
Its safer to suppose that there are aliens then to suppose that there are not aliens. The universe is so big that rare things can happen all the time. So to be nice and entertain the idea of intelligent design, it is better to use aliens as the intelligent agent because they are more statistically probable than gods. As far as we know, complex things can't just be there by default and a beings mere will has no way of conjuring matter from nothing. God then, is an extra leap in logic.
@guydecervens like i said missed the point. he said he could conceive the possibility of that. not that he thinks that has any likely hood. What Dawkins is saying there, is that while how ever unlikely it is a better explanation than the "god theory". He clearly displays an understanding in his books and other speeches of the formation of life on this planet and his "alien" reference here is nothing more than satire.
@WolfOfAtheism Ok, Dawkins could 'conceive of' aliens have seeded life on earth. Well then I conceive of Dawkins being a moron. Has he ever seen an alien? Has he ever had any communication from an alien? Has he any proof they exist? But he is willing to 'conceive of' them having seeded life on earth!!! And yet he arrogantly derides those who 'conceive of' some sort of intelligent design? Sounds a bit weasel froggish to me.
@guydecervens Well the main point is that it is natural and not supernatural. also he really was remarking on the psychology of the ease in which humans want to assign a creator then he gave a slightly sarcastic alternative to the supernatural with a possible but not supported natural answer. its not that he believes it but that he was remarking on the fact that if space aliens are more probable than a god really makes gods silly. like i said, it was satire
If you go to conservapedia, it says, "According to atheistic biologist Richard Dawkins, the joints of the Lesser Spotted Weasel Frog continue to present a challenge to the Theory of Evolution insofar as their origin cannot be explained by gradual degrees."
I dont like the all or nothing, combination lock analogy because at least with a lock someone knows, with certitude, the combination and therefore gets the "jackpot". God is nowhere near this certitude. RD is a biologist. They are not the most qualified people to be speaking about theology or philosophy. How did he ever get famous on this subject, I'll never know. I don't like him.
dawkins couldn't imagine his way out of a paper bag... he's a zoologist with no credentials to apply to mind sciences, but he sure does like to hear himself act like he does...dork x10
@SuperMrAtheist whats to read that he doesn't already talk about? I think it would be to painful to read his multi universe analogy where he has a "green bread" in another universe( he supposes).... I find that hilarious that he wants to invoke "reason" and "logic" when he employs such goofy rebuttals.... it is funny I agree.
I get more out of lectures given by behavioral biologist and neurobiologist than a snarky evolutionary theorist. but thanks for the concern.
@romney27 You have no idea what he talks about. You are assuming you know but you don't. To call someone names before you even know his work is ignorant. It must be too big of a book for you. Maybe if it had pop-up pictures.lol
@SuperMrAtheist "You have no idea what he talks about."...lo assumptions? classic. I suppose all the videos about what he "talks" about has no relation to what he "writes" about? If you think that's true, then calling you "ignorant" would be an understatment! Why not just get to the meat of your argument? you beat a vague drum.
it's not rocket science, "free will" covers beliefs in gods and religions. I could draw you a Venn digram, but I think "balls" are over your head.(get it!?) lol
You know what I think is funny... Even if Life on Earth WAS a Jackpot hit... it's STILL not improbable due to the sheer size of the universe.
Out of millions of lottery participants SOMEONE needs to win the jackpot. That it is one specific person is improbable, but that it's just SOMEONE... well that has a 100% chance.
So even if it WAS a Jackpot situation with Life on Earth, which it isn't.,it'd still be perfectly plausible without the need for gods, actually.
@Shavarnarak No, you're wrong. If you could say the laws of physics ONLY apply to the earth, then you would be right. But, the laws of physics apply to the whole Universe. The Universe being created from nothing would be like hitting the Power Ball Lotto 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times in a row.
@YesYou123333 Dude, nobody ever said anything about the universe being "created from nothing". The only people who say that are creationists trying to make scientists look stupid. In effect they only make themselves look stupid. The truth is, we simply don't know exactly how the universe started, other than the fact that there was a massive, rapid expansion of matter. And where did you get that ridiculous number? That which we do not know (and cannot happen) cannot quantified, silly.
@sillymonkey829 What do you mean "nobody ever said anything about the universe being 'created from nothing'"? That's exactly what they're saying. So, if you "don't know" then IT IS possible a God caused it, correct?
@YesYou123333 What reputable scientist has ever said that? It is faintly possible that a god did it, however I think that natural causes are much more likely. And where did this god, who must be much more complex than the universe it created come from? It just sets the question back a step. Matter and energy have always existed, constantly changing in shape and form. We just don't know exactly how it got the way it is today. That doesn't mean god did it, that's simply an argument from ignorance.
@sillymonkey829 God doesn't need a creator because He transcends all space and time. The Universe, on the other hand, does not transcend space and time so it DOES need a creator. Do you need to know where the architect of a building came from in order to know an architect designed it?
@YesYou123333 The question then would be how do you know he transcends all space and time? No work has been done to prove this! It comes off as a excuse from ignorance. Like "We can't find any proof of god at all, so this proves he is outside the borders of reality" This doesn't compute. The building/watchmaker idea is silly. Architects have dads, architects don't build from nothing, buildings can't make baby buildings. (bown chicka wha wha) So the comparison makes no sense.
@TheEVILutionist If time had a beginning then whoever created it MUST transcend space and time. It's not ignorance it's science. You guys love science, don't you?
@YesYou123333 time isnt a "creation" its a product of movement. if nothing moved, would you say that there was time? Probably not. time dosen't exist. get your head out of the clouds.. or should i say.. gods ass.
So really, can someone explain with to me how the elbow joint of the weasel frog evolved? I couldn't find it on search engines! A thank you in advance.
Discovered in 2003: The underlying law of nature. . Discovered in 2008: The empirical process by which one may identify the underlying law of nature first hand, for oneself. . This knowledge comes with no middleman wearing a fancy hat, cape, scarf, ring or necklace to obey and pay. . Think about it. . The underlying law of nature is the observable, constant, most fundamental way of all things -- all matter, energy, forms, forces, thoughts, behaviour, events and conditions. . Google it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
He is just making more stand up, another greedy person that do all for cash. He still is nothing more then a theologists and want to share he's stupid idea and making ppl fall to disbelief, but then what proof have he?
@Plinkington sexual deviant? hmmm remember that hee sees not only kinky sex acts but he see how people kill. He sees how one person slowly cuts off head of other person which is concious. He must be fucked up if he is real lol of course he is myth so that is relief. Hawing so fucked up god would be sick :]
Interesting point... Since creationists see themselves as "perfect creations" in god's image, I can understand why they would argue that our existence is an uncrackable bank vault.
Why do we have an appendix again? Oh yeah... little flaws... life is not perfect, but it learns from its mistakes.
You are right. The more I look at my own words the more I realize that it was a very "un-Christian" thing to say. I guess it is his dismissive and sarcastic tone that made me mad. I spoke out of anger. my hope is that none will suffer in hell. It was a pretty awful thing to say. In the end being a Christian does not override my being human. But thats what Christianity is all about. Trying to be like Christ and realizing your bankruptcy and therefore your great need for his help and compassion.
"Im hoping im there to see Dawkins face when he stands before an omnipotent being." Yeah I can understand your point of view, too bad its not gonna happen though. Have a good day.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
So you dont believe the same thing I do...::golfclap::...How bout giving me definitive proof he does not exist and/or what the meaning of life is, aswell as your theory on the origin of the universe??.......? And after you come up with that you can show me the hundreds of millions of people who believe you..........??
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
How bout 6 days? We can take a break on the 7th and discuss it over coffee. You come up with a theory that will stand the test of time like the bible has and ill bring the coffee.
Stand the test of time ? Ahah how about stand the test of EDUCATION. Doesnt it concern you that the most hardcore religious people in the world be they Christians or Muslims or whatever are either really dumb or uneducated. You make it sound as if you have any kind of evidence besides a book written that is contradictory all the way through of the existence of an omnipotent being. You dont.
" most hardcore religious people in the world be they Christians or Muslims or whatever are either really dumb or uneducated.".....WOW! That, my friend, may be the most UNEDUCATED statement I have ever read. Show me a man wiser than Salomon, more insightful than C.S. Lewis or more imaginative than J.R.R. Tolkien. The list goes on and on. No EDUCATED atheist worth his salt would ever make such a ridiculous claim, Including Dawkins.Contradictory? No doubt, to you, it would seem so.
I attempted to spread the spaghetti gospel at an evangelist christian concert (my girlfriend was forced to go via her parents, I tagged along for her sake... glad I did, she was REALLY depressed from it all)
anyways... I tried texting a 'see your txt on-screen!' message, to see the reactions of the crowd... but they were apparently checked before they appeared on-screen >.<
... it was terrifying... so many crazy, sky-daddy worshipers!
@HypnoPants "Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together before We split them asunder ? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?" QURAN
@HypnoPants "Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together before We split them asunder ? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?" -Quran
If your invisible sky-daddy is the creaor and omnipotent he created me as an atheist therefore, via my atheism, I'm living my life by his will so I can't be punished for it. Either your god is an omnipotent creaor or not, make your mind up.
Do you always have to add the clip at the beginning where Dawkins thanks for the applause, in every single clip you post of him? ^^ It's getting repetitive.
Why are they called 'combination' locks? Clearly, they're _permutation_ locks. That is, you can use the same number more than once, and it REALLY matters what order they're in
Failure of imagination is exactly EXACTLY what happened to the series of finale of Battlestar Galacita. stupid RJ Moore and hist "lolgoddidit" finale.
I much prefer Dawkins talking about evolution and creationism/neo-creationism ("Intelligent Design") than religion and philosophy, where I think he is really rather poor.
"I much prefer Dawkins talking about evolution and creationism/neo-creationism ("Intelligent Design") than religion and philosophy, where I think he is really rather poor"
If that's what you think then may I suggest that you read his excellent book "The God Delusion" and then comment on his knowledge of religion.
I've read some of it, and it's not very impressive at all. For example, he spends three pages on the cosmological arguments for the existence of God, and all he does is insult St. Thomas Aquinas and attack a straw man. He doesn't even mention Gottfired Leibniz and the principle of sufficient reason, Aquinas' argument from necessity and contingency etc.
As you are totally unimpressed with his book and obviously intellectually superior to the uninformed professor may I suggest you write your own book telling him where he has gone wrong in his long and indistinguished career.
I agree with you that Aquinas' Third Way does not succeed in proving the existence of God (although I don't think it to be "incredibly poor"; indeed, I find it rather interesting.) However, I simply feel that Dawkins is extremely lightweight and narrow-minded when it comes to philosophy of religion and theology.
By the way, I am an atheist, only I prefer David Hume and Jean-Paul Sartre.
the fundamental flaw all christians have is the inability to say "i was wrong." real revelation is impossible for these people as it puts them in the uncomfortable position of admitting past ignorance.
it's a waste of time to try and argue with christians -- they are by their very nature too ignorant for self-reflection. Let the lemmings topple into the sea. Who cares? We are better off without them and their stupefyingly ignorant views.
Religion, unfortunately, is not a harmless pursuit which we can merely watch and laugh at. It is a dangerous, divisive force in the world. There's a positively excellent video here on YouTube entitled "Why Atheists Care about your Religion" or something of that nature, by GoGreen18. I highly encourage you and everyone else to watch it.
But since Mr. Hovind is unable to make personal appearances at this time perhaps, if he can get phone privileges at his "government housing" he could call the Atheist Experience at 512-477-2288 between 4:30-6:00 Central Standard Time and take his best shot.
Set that up, will you and tell Dr. Hovind hi for me.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What can I say? I'm sorry if I've offended you. I specifically searched for atheist videos to post on, that's pretty rude. God does exist though, and I'm compelled to share it with people. Everyone's fine with religions that don't make it an issue whether you believe or not. But as soon as Christ says Lay down your life and follow me, I'm the only Way, people get upset. Can I water it down for you? No, that would negate the enlightenment and salvation Christ offers.
You make a fantastical statement that I must ask you to support. You said,"God does exist..." and I would love you to help myself and other YTers and tell us what sort of evidence you might have for your wild claim. Thanks, in advance.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The point is not that God is gravity, but that if the gravitational constant (G) didn't fall within a certain finite range which is within the infinite range of all real numbers the universe would not exist. G too small then stars never form, G too big the universe collapses before heavy metal elements (rock) can form. Without God...that's like RANDOMLY throwing a dart at an INFINITELY large dart board AND getting the bulls-eye. infinity:1 odds. God is in charge, now you know. ;)
The flaw in your logic is that you fail to realise that each of those numbers on which the gravitational constant can fall have equal chances of being chosen. If we take your dartboard analogy, each random throw of a dart has the equal chance to hit the bulls-eye. Another example is winning a competition in which millions of people entered. The odds are extremely high, yet everyone has the same chance of winning, and someone has to win. Improbable doesn't mean impossible.
my problem with that approach is that you can not show that god even exists, that god has the ability to control gravitational forces, where god came from, how YOU are able to know all these things about god...
it seems that you just took "I don't know" and slapped a face/name on it...
Dawkins says that he can imagine "God like beings", but that they would not be gods since they are a product of the universe, not the creator of it.
In a very limited and primitive sense, we can already create universes via simulation. Would a simulated intelligence in a simulated environment be able to figure out that it was a simulation? Would the man or team who created the simulation, be considered it's god?
Is it easier for an atheist to imagine the concept of god in those terms?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
That's a beautiful concept. But I think the answer is no. Atheists don't like God because they love to be self destructive and/or prideful and God has things to say about both of those. If everyone pointed their moral compasses toward God because they loved Him oh what a wonderful world it would be. And don't give me any crap about stoning people, you know youre misinterpreting things to please yourself. Just go straight to the part where Jesus says, Love God, Love others. It's most important.
You don't know shit. All christians don't know shit. You do realize that your whole religion is probably only 20% of what true christianity is (i mean like the instant the religion started). If you want to talk about misinterpreting things to please yourself, then i advice you to stop. You are the last person who should say something like that. i would bet you money that most atheists are more moral than christians, and it is simply because we are smart enough to decide on our own what is right.
you are so incredibly ridicules that i cant answer you, except to look at you and wonder how you made it this far in life , do you remember the movie dum and dumer , well they where brain surgeons compared too you .
"Atheists don't like God because they love to be self destructive and/or prideful and God has things to say about both of those"
What a galactically ignorant, naive, dogmatic, foolish, pious, sanctimonious and downright stupid thing to say. Loving Jesus doesn't give you any awareness of reality, does it theM3dic?
Yes, i'm atheist because i love doing self destructive things. Thats why 2 weeks ago i changed an elderly womans tire in -10 degree weather and told her to keep her money.
You're an ignorant asshole. you're the type of christian i hate the most. The type that nit picks the bible so all you read are things like, love thy neighbor, honor they father. Not..Kill your son if he speaks against you, or stone a person for having mixed threads in their clothing.
@daBeastest18
I used to take computers to the knee like you but then I took an arrow to the knee.
MonoplyMan99 3 weeks ago
@thenofxer I looked for that comment also, until I took a computer to the knee...
daBeastest18 2 months ago
I'm looking for the arrow to the knee comment to no avail...
thenofxer 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
SpencerBenedict2nd 4 months ago
3.15 Ultimate God??? Looks more like a fish to me.. :S
charlieking100 6 months ago
@charlieking100 Its a 'fish' with Boeing wings. Its a play on the use of the Jesus ΙΧΘΥΣ fish.
Cafeeine 5 months ago in playlist More videos from FFreeThinker
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
or
figure4etc3.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
TheServiceWeb 7 months ago
What I don't get is why something as beautiful as evolution couldn't have been God's design.
Is there some reason that primitive life couldn't exist without evolution ?
tonycatman 7 months ago
Where did the records come from on Euclid? Man god, or God? Can you trust the source 100% as to bet your life on it? You say you have yet to see any evidence on God. Really? Where is the evidence that there is no God? How do you know without a doubt that what you read or see is true? It was 90 degrees here today. How do I prove that without a shadow of a doubt to those in the future 2-3,00 years from now? Read the news or turn on a television. Everyday events are changed, distorted, & lied about
squeak111974 7 months ago
If God himself came down today and proved himself for all the world to see, would there be anything anyone could do to prove it to those who will doubt his existence 2,000 years in the future?
squeak111974 8 months ago
@squeak111974 We have records of math problems being solved by Euclid, about 2500 years ago. If God would appear, we would know, don't worry. Since we have yet to see any evidence at all, we'll just assume he doesnt not exist. Now the question goes back to you. If another god was to descend and show himself, would you believe in it, knowing that you had been wrong your whole life? Being atheist, I would change my mind.
MihaZ 7 months ago
@HateFieldLies -you've already got sufficient proof to believe. Israel must be a nation in the end or the Bible is false. It wasn't a nation for over 2,000 years. Today it is one. Jerusalem must be divided in the end, or the Bible's wrong. It's divided into Christian, Jewish, Muslim quarters. People don't believe because they don't want to.
Mossinator5000Deluxe 8 months ago
@Mossinator5000Deluxe Or because it makes no fucking sense.
MihaZ 7 months ago
#OMG the most #SWAG #BASED vid on youtube search : i swag by yasha swag.
37425890 8 months ago
@Drecon84 If you were to die and say "God, you hid yourself", he might say,"Ever heard of the Jesus?" he could also mention that in order to know if the New Testament is based in fact, you would need for Israel to become a nation, Jerusalem to be divided, the world to lack faith in God, crazy weather, and all in close proximety. Then he can say,"oh yeah, it all lined up at the same period of history, hid myself? No not really." seek and u shall find. Atheists don't wanna seek.
Mossinator5000Deluxe 8 months ago
@Mossinator5000Deluxe Atheists look for proof. Good provides no proof. Simple as that.
HateFilledLies 8 months ago
@Drecon84 We don't know God's judgement of anyone. We can't judge him for something we know nothing about. We don't even know what Hell is literally, nor do we know who goes there. For all we know this is Hell. We have no idea. It's all speculation. To judge God on this issue is like accusing your wife of cheating when she hasn't, but saying "you were going to and I know it."
Mossinator5000Deluxe 8 months ago
@Drecon84 You say evidence elsewhere. Well you've got three predominate spreading religions as of now. Islam, which came long after Christ and preaches specifically against Christ actually fulfilling Biblical prophecy of a false prophet and false religion in the end. Christ centered beliefs, love your enemy, do unto others, etc. And finally Atheism which fulfills Biblical prophecy of men turning from faith in God in the end. It actually all sets up nicely with what the Bible describes.
Mossinator5000Deluxe 8 months ago
@iworkforme God created science much like a programmer designs the rules of a video game. From the Christian perspective, there's nothing scary about science.
Mossinator5000Deluxe 8 months ago
Did you know that the banana is perfectly shaped to fit into the hand of a crockaduck? You can't explain that!!
skywize 8 months ago
he is the ultimate 747.
that sentence is just plain awsome
weswes666 8 months ago
Sir Richard. You have taught me how to think. For that I am grateful. I have had the fortune, with my uneducated attempt at reasoning, to watch christian's running away from me. I hope it's because I suggested that their "science based" rebuttals require more than the answer I could offer and that if i did consult with an actual scientist that they must be prepared to debate fact much further. They all become poopy lipped and resentful quite quickly.
iworkforme 9 months ago
@BlackHalo28 -the Sims can't prove you do or do not exist. It's circular reasoning to say God does or doesn't exist. I think God sets life and death before people, and says, "you choose. I'm not going to force myself on you but here I am." Dawkins throws science around as a reason to reject God. Science has actually helped my faith. There are many possibilities that differ from Atheism. I offered alternate theories. Abiogenesis is a theory. Simulated reality is a theory.
Mossinator5000Deluxe 9 months ago
Dawkins believes in the big bang and abiogenesis but gives no thought on what's outside the universe. He also gives no regard to the theory that there could be someone outside the universe that knows something that we do not.
Mossinator5000Deluxe 9 months ago
@Mossinator5000Deluxe Even if you would be right, then this must be a real cruel god to spread evidence for other theories everywhere. He hides himself really well and then tortures anyone that cannot find him for eternity. Not the kind of god that I could ever believe in.
Drecon84 9 months ago 2
If this were like the matrix, those in the matrix know nothing about what's outside the matrix. They would be ignorant to how things were outside the matrix, and if they said they weren't in a matrix reality, they would be wrong. Their laws of physics and science would be programmed and would apply nowhere outside of the matrix.
Mossinator5000Deluxe 9 months ago
@Mossinator5000Deluxe Ergo? What's the point here? He is wrong because he cannot prove something that cannot be tested?
BlackHalo28 9 months ago
It has a name Dawkins. Its callled an argument from ignorance.
gulbirk 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
use to rock richard: wwwf4wpeaceDOTde...F4 World Peace by Cultural-Change. by Anti-Christ-Aisha-klein aka sun, an agnostic because of dick.
Peace All
Inshallah
f4wpeace 10 months ago
Its safer to suppose that there are aliens then to suppose that there are not aliens. The universe is so big that rare things can happen all the time. So to be nice and entertain the idea of intelligent design, it is better to use aliens as the intelligent agent because they are more statistically probable than gods. As far as we know, complex things can't just be there by default and a beings mere will has no way of conjuring matter from nothing. God then, is an extra leap in logic.
CorndogMaker 11 months ago
@CorndogMaker sure. but saying with absolutely certainty that there is a god, is not logical at all.
it's better to say "since i do not know enough about the universe, i will suspend judgement on whether there is or isn't a god."
after all, humanity doesn't know shit about what's out there. we are just starting to find out.
OyonTheAdept 10 months ago
A twitchy idiot who believes in aliens worshipped by twitchy idiots who believe in aliens!
guydecervens 1 year ago
@guydecervens you are either a troll or completely missed the point
WolfOfAtheism 11 months ago
@WolfOfAtheism No other possibility eh, like Dawkins admits to believing life on earth may have started by aliens seeding it here?
guydecervens 11 months ago
@guydecervens like i said missed the point. he said he could conceive the possibility of that. not that he thinks that has any likely hood. What Dawkins is saying there, is that while how ever unlikely it is a better explanation than the "god theory". He clearly displays an understanding in his books and other speeches of the formation of life on this planet and his "alien" reference here is nothing more than satire.
WolfOfAtheism 11 months ago
@WolfOfAtheism Ok, Dawkins could 'conceive of' aliens have seeded life on earth. Well then I conceive of Dawkins being a moron. Has he ever seen an alien? Has he ever had any communication from an alien? Has he any proof they exist? But he is willing to 'conceive of' them having seeded life on earth!!! And yet he arrogantly derides those who 'conceive of' some sort of intelligent design? Sounds a bit weasel froggish to me.
guydecervens 11 months ago
@guydecervens Well the main point is that it is natural and not supernatural. also he really was remarking on the psychology of the ease in which humans want to assign a creator then he gave a slightly sarcastic alternative to the supernatural with a possible but not supported natural answer. its not that he believes it but that he was remarking on the fact that if space aliens are more probable than a god really makes gods silly. like i said, it was satire
WolfOfAtheism 11 months ago
If you go to conservapedia, it says, "According to atheistic biologist Richard Dawkins, the joints of the Lesser Spotted Weasel Frog continue to present a challenge to the Theory of Evolution insofar as their origin cannot be explained by gradual degrees."
lol! !!
ChaseKittens 1 year ago
@ChaseKittens You just gotta love the stupid!!!!
ciaochowbella 1 year ago
I dont like the all or nothing, combination lock analogy because at least with a lock someone knows, with certitude, the combination and therefore gets the "jackpot". God is nowhere near this certitude. RD is a biologist. They are not the most qualified people to be speaking about theology or philosophy. How did he ever get famous on this subject, I'll never know. I don't like him.
Pigroota 1 year ago
dawkins couldn't imagine his way out of a paper bag... he's a zoologist with no credentials to apply to mind sciences, but he sure does like to hear himself act like he does...dork x10
romney27 1 year ago
@romney27 have you read his book? lol
SuperMrAtheist 7 months ago
@SuperMrAtheist I'm familiar with his work and think he's an idiot. he's a blowhard
romney27 7 months ago
@romney27 So I take it that means no.lol
SuperMrAtheist 7 months ago
@SuperMrAtheist whats to read that he doesn't already talk about? I think it would be to painful to read his multi universe analogy where he has a "green bread" in another universe( he supposes).... I find that hilarious that he wants to invoke "reason" and "logic" when he employs such goofy rebuttals.... it is funny I agree.
I get more out of lectures given by behavioral biologist and neurobiologist than a snarky evolutionary theorist. but thanks for the concern.
romney27 7 months ago
@romney27 You have no idea what he talks about. You are assuming you know but you don't. To call someone names before you even know his work is ignorant. It must be too big of a book for you. Maybe if it had pop-up pictures.lol
SuperMrAtheist 7 months ago
@SuperMrAtheist "You have no idea what he talks about."...lo assumptions? classic. I suppose all the videos about what he "talks" about has no relation to what he "writes" about? If you think that's true, then calling you "ignorant" would be an understatment! Why not just get to the meat of your argument? you beat a vague drum.
it's not rocket science, "free will" covers beliefs in gods and religions. I could draw you a Venn digram, but I think "balls" are over your head.(get it!?) lol
romney27 7 months ago
You know what I think is funny... Even if Life on Earth WAS a Jackpot hit... it's STILL not improbable due to the sheer size of the universe.
Out of millions of lottery participants SOMEONE needs to win the jackpot. That it is one specific person is improbable, but that it's just SOMEONE... well that has a 100% chance.
So even if it WAS a Jackpot situation with Life on Earth, which it isn't.,it'd still be perfectly plausible without the need for gods, actually.
Shavarnarak 1 year ago
@Shavarnarak No, you're wrong. If you could say the laws of physics ONLY apply to the earth, then you would be right. But, the laws of physics apply to the whole Universe. The Universe being created from nothing would be like hitting the Power Ball Lotto 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times in a row.
YesYou123333 1 year ago
@YesYou123333 Dude, nobody ever said anything about the universe being "created from nothing". The only people who say that are creationists trying to make scientists look stupid. In effect they only make themselves look stupid. The truth is, we simply don't know exactly how the universe started, other than the fact that there was a massive, rapid expansion of matter. And where did you get that ridiculous number? That which we do not know (and cannot happen) cannot quantified, silly.
sillymonkey829 1 year ago
@sillymonkey829 What do you mean "nobody ever said anything about the universe being 'created from nothing'"? That's exactly what they're saying. So, if you "don't know" then IT IS possible a God caused it, correct?
YesYou123333 1 year ago
@YesYou123333 What reputable scientist has ever said that? It is faintly possible that a god did it, however I think that natural causes are much more likely. And where did this god, who must be much more complex than the universe it created come from? It just sets the question back a step. Matter and energy have always existed, constantly changing in shape and form. We just don't know exactly how it got the way it is today. That doesn't mean god did it, that's simply an argument from ignorance.
sillymonkey829 1 year ago
@sillymonkey829 God doesn't need a creator because He transcends all space and time. The Universe, on the other hand, does not transcend space and time so it DOES need a creator. Do you need to know where the architect of a building came from in order to know an architect designed it?
YesYou123333 1 year ago
@YesYou123333 The question then would be how do you know he transcends all space and time? No work has been done to prove this! It comes off as a excuse from ignorance. Like "We can't find any proof of god at all, so this proves he is outside the borders of reality" This doesn't compute. The building/watchmaker idea is silly. Architects have dads, architects don't build from nothing, buildings can't make baby buildings. (bown chicka wha wha) So the comparison makes no sense.
TheEVILutionist 1 year ago
@TheEVILutionist If time had a beginning then whoever created it MUST transcend space and time. It's not ignorance it's science. You guys love science, don't you?
YesYou123333 1 year ago
@YesYou123333 Why is it who and not what? bias is not science
TheEVILutionist 1 year ago
@TheEVILutionist How about both? How about everything?
YesYou123333 1 year ago
@YesYou123333 `What` makes more sense since there in no evdience a who exists.
TheEVILutionist 1 year ago
@YesYou123333 time isnt a "creation" its a product of movement. if nothing moved, would you say that there was time? Probably not. time dosen't exist. get your head out of the clouds.. or should i say.. gods ass.
radahad000 1 year ago
So really, can someone explain with to me how the elbow joint of the weasel frog evolved? I couldn't find it on search engines! A thank you in advance.
blogheads 1 year ago
@FFree Thinker
Did you use cyberlink powermedia video editor to make this video? The part at the end with the flames looked familiar...
henrycazaux 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TedDGPoulos 1 year ago
Love it. Dawkins explaining something so elegantly and with a sense of humour.
dstachon2002 1 year ago 5
Does anyone know where I can get an ultimate 747 fish for my car?
wilfredthebold 2 years ago
You are all going to Hell !!!!
I'll wait for you there with beer and women =P
IcedPhoenix666 2 years ago 8
Just make sure they're hot and cold the right way round.
Infidelerious 2 years ago
@IcedPhoenix666 don't be stingy and bring some men for me ;q
hipp6y 1 year ago
@edgemasterrobin Very easy. By insisting that the burden of poof is always with the one making the claim for existence.
Do you have proof that there are no leprechauns in Ireland? No. And you don't have to have such proof.
@gjen55 Oh yeah, he makes so much money. I bet all those megachurch televangelist pastors look like peasants next to him.
lagerbaer 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He is just making more stand up, another greedy person that do all for cash. He still is nothing more then a theologists and want to share he's stupid idea and making ppl fall to disbelief, but then what proof have he?
Gjen55 2 years ago
My god Thor has a hammer, the Christian god was nailed to a cross.
Any questions?
Plinkington 2 years ago 9
and my god can wank himself nonstop. Any questions
7BeAsT9 2 years ago 2
Yes, does he use some kind of super lube?
How does he keep his penis from chafing?
Plinkington 2 years ago
he is god, remember ? he is OMNIPOTENT muahahaha
:) funny I feel like dumb christian. They always find stupid answer lol
7BeAsT9 2 years ago
Omnipotent you say, does that mean he gets turned on by everything. god is a sexual deviant. :)
Plinkington 2 years ago
@Plinkington sexual deviant? hmmm remember that hee sees not only kinky sex acts but he see how people kill. He sees how one person slowly cuts off head of other person which is concious. He must be fucked up if he is real lol of course he is myth so that is relief. Hawing so fucked up god would be sick :]
7BeAsT9 2 years ago
Interesting point... Since creationists see themselves as "perfect creations" in god's image, I can understand why they would argue that our existence is an uncrackable bank vault.
Why do we have an appendix again? Oh yeah... little flaws... life is not perfect, but it learns from its mistakes.
werdnativ 2 years ago
i fucking killed god with a big hammer in the woods....he screamed like a little bitch
keggerous 2 years ago
what? That is rather confusing.... :S
Inmylifealive 2 years ago
What was that @ 2:35 onwards.
Prof Dawkins saying that the late great Sir Francis Crick speculated that life on earth originated from another planet.
Is'nt that what that weird non-senseicle cult of $cientology is about.
In all seriousness is that what some Biologists suspect?
JONNOG88 2 years ago
No, Crick believed in panspermia.
UnDeitized 2 years ago
orly?
PlzDieNow 2 years ago
He talked of it as possibility, but he didn't believe it.
Coldwarwinner 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Im hoping im there to see Dawkins face when he stands before an omnipotent being. I can just hear his winy voice saying "well, shit!"
TheSouthernorycle 2 years ago
Ah the Schadenfreude of Christianity. At its heart joy at being able to witness the torture of others who don't think like you do.
AHPMB 2 years ago 4
You are right. The more I look at my own words the more I realize that it was a very "un-Christian" thing to say. I guess it is his dismissive and sarcastic tone that made me mad. I spoke out of anger. my hope is that none will suffer in hell. It was a pretty awful thing to say. In the end being a Christian does not override my being human. But thats what Christianity is all about. Trying to be like Christ and realizing your bankruptcy and therefore your great need for his help and compassion.
TheSouthernorycle 2 years ago
"Im hoping im there to see Dawkins face when he stands before an omnipotent being." Yeah I can understand your point of view, too bad its not gonna happen though. Have a good day.
Churchx77 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
So you dont believe the same thing I do...::golfclap::...How bout giving me definitive proof he does not exist and/or what the meaning of life is, aswell as your theory on the origin of the universe??.......? And after you come up with that you can show me the hundreds of millions of people who believe you..........??
TheSouthernorycle 2 years ago
How about you give me definite proof that he exists since he's so real and I'm so wrong.
Churchx77 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hows that theory of yours coming along?
TheSouthernorycle 2 years ago
Give me 7 days.
Churchx77 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
How bout 6 days? We can take a break on the 7th and discuss it over coffee. You come up with a theory that will stand the test of time like the bible has and ill bring the coffee.
TheSouthernorycle 2 years ago
Stand the test of time ? Ahah how about stand the test of EDUCATION. Doesnt it concern you that the most hardcore religious people in the world be they Christians or Muslims or whatever are either really dumb or uneducated. You make it sound as if you have any kind of evidence besides a book written that is contradictory all the way through of the existence of an omnipotent being. You dont.
Churchx77 2 years ago 3
" most hardcore religious people in the world be they Christians or Muslims or whatever are either really dumb or uneducated.".....WOW! That, my friend, may be the most UNEDUCATED statement I have ever read. Show me a man wiser than Salomon, more insightful than C.S. Lewis or more imaginative than J.R.R. Tolkien. The list goes on and on. No EDUCATED atheist worth his salt would ever make such a ridiculous claim, Including Dawkins.Contradictory? No doubt, to you, it would seem so.
TheSouthernorycle 2 years ago
Einstein was a pretty smart guy right... Wasn't he an Atheist
hifhif123 2 years ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No.
TheSouthernorycle 2 years ago
im pretty sure like most smart ppl he had his ideas but in the end he understood he didtn know...
keggerous 2 years ago
Yeah, einstein was an atheist. But when has the truth ever convinced a theist?
Sav3TheWorld 2 years ago 10
@TheSouthernorycle
- you SIR have sullied the good name of the church of the flying spaghetti monster!
How DARE you spout your bullshit about your great sky-god! there is only one true GOD! and he is NOODLY!
Praise be thy Noodly Master
RAmen
HypnoPants 2 years ago 91
@HypnoPants yo man, you have the baddest comments I've ever read... awesome dude! noodly... hahaha, that oughta get on their nerves...
champjklccmk 1 year ago 2
@champjklccmk
- tee hee hee :)
I attempted to spread the spaghetti gospel at an evangelist christian concert (my girlfriend was forced to go via her parents, I tagged along for her sake... glad I did, she was REALLY depressed from it all)
anyways... I tried texting a 'see your txt on-screen!' message, to see the reactions of the crowd... but they were apparently checked before they appeared on-screen >.<
... it was terrifying... so many crazy, sky-daddy worshipers!
R'Amen
HypnoPants 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HypnoPants "Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together before We split them asunder ? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?" QURAN
linmgo 1 year ago
@HypnoPants how dare you blaspheme against the giant pot noodle in the sky, you shall drown in a fiery lake of beef and tomato sauce
Thenicereviewguy 9 months ago
@HypnoPants TROLLED! Lol xD
ApatheticOmniscience 5 months ago
@TheSouthernorycle
I think (certainly not sure) that he means people of this time. In other words, that are still alive.
supergamwich 1 year ago
@TheSouthernorycle
- do YOU have any proof that the almighty flying spaghetti monster does not exist? No? Didn't think so!
Go preach to your false God!
I hope you spend an eternity in molten pasta sauce!
RAmen
HypnoPants 2 years ago 135
@HypnoPants all heil the spaghetti monster.
gulbirk 1 year ago 7
@gulbirk
- R'Amen indeed :P
HypnoPants 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HypnoPants "Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together before We split them asunder ? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?" -Quran
Think
linmgo 1 year ago
@HypnoPants After reading your comments, I'm hungry!!
charlieking100 5 months ago
If your invisible sky-daddy is the creaor and omnipotent he created me as an atheist therefore, via my atheism, I'm living my life by his will so I can't be punished for it. Either your god is an omnipotent creaor or not, make your mind up.
aikifan77 2 years ago 8
Do you always have to add the clip at the beginning where Dawkins thanks for the applause, in every single clip you post of him? ^^ It's getting repetitive.
Mithcoriel 2 years ago
Why are they called 'combination' locks? Clearly, they're _permutation_ locks. That is, you can use the same number more than once, and it REALLY matters what order they're in
tinygirl505 2 years ago
Failure of imagination is exactly EXACTLY what happened to the series of finale of Battlestar Galacita. stupid RJ Moore and hist "lolgoddidit" finale.
TheDeadlyKind 2 years ago 3
Thanks you Dawkins for keeping the religious nuts out of the way so the other scientists can do their research and advance the world.
cdmcgrat 2 years ago 4
Either God exists or He doesn't.
Both possibilities are scary.
KFkrymz 3 years ago
@KFkrymz
Why would it be scary if he does not?
supergamwich 1 year ago
meh, dawkings rarely makes any SOLID points.
Maybe hes too advanced for me and i cant curl my hands around what he's trying conclude.
leojboby 3 years ago
Perhaps, yes.
isafos 2 years ago 4
I much prefer Dawkins talking about evolution and creationism/neo-creationism ("Intelligent Design") than religion and philosophy, where I think he is really rather poor.
VanDoodah 3 years ago
"I much prefer Dawkins talking about evolution and creationism/neo-creationism ("Intelligent Design") than religion and philosophy, where I think he is really rather poor"
If that's what you think then may I suggest that you read his excellent book "The God Delusion" and then comment on his knowledge of religion.
Pigdowndog 3 years ago 2
I've read some of it, and it's not very impressive at all. For example, he spends three pages on the cosmological arguments for the existence of God, and all he does is insult St. Thomas Aquinas and attack a straw man. He doesn't even mention Gottfired Leibniz and the principle of sufficient reason, Aquinas' argument from necessity and contingency etc.
As I said, he should really stick to science.
VanDoodah 3 years ago
"As I said, he should really stick to science".
As you are totally unimpressed with his book and obviously intellectually superior to the uninformed professor may I suggest you write your own book telling him where he has gone wrong in his long and indistinguished career.
Now what was idiom about pride and a fall?
Pigdowndog 3 years ago 3
Aquinas' argument from necessity is so incredibly poor, it's amazing that people still pull it out.
magicponyrides 2 years ago
I agree with you that Aquinas' Third Way does not succeed in proving the existence of God (although I don't think it to be "incredibly poor"; indeed, I find it rather interesting.) However, I simply feel that Dawkins is extremely lightweight and narrow-minded when it comes to philosophy of religion and theology.
By the way, I am an atheist, only I prefer David Hume and Jean-Paul Sartre.
VanDoodah 2 years ago
Fair enough. I think he is, at the very least, an excellent communicator of the basics to a mass audience.
magicponyrides 2 years ago
@VanDoodah
Dawkins narrowminded? Really? Care to ellaborate on that? :)
supergamwich 1 year ago 3
@VanDoodah
Some of it really doesn't count.
It's like saying: I read the first chapter of LOTR and the story obviously sucks.
supergamwich 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
somehow I just can't stand this guy, he's a fucking obnoxious, manipulative British cunt
semiliteratedgod 3 years ago
Why am I interested in this subject? I am looking for a reason for life. So if GOD created me then he made a mistake.
flyingfisbeefilms 3 years ago
the fundamental flaw all christians have is the inability to say "i was wrong." real revelation is impossible for these people as it puts them in the uncomfortable position of admitting past ignorance.
styrofoamheart 3 years ago 2
it's a waste of time to try and argue with christians -- they are by their very nature too ignorant for self-reflection. Let the lemmings topple into the sea. Who cares? We are better off without them and their stupefyingly ignorant views.
Ironbudokan 3 years ago
Religion, unfortunately, is not a harmless pursuit which we can merely watch and laugh at. It is a dangerous, divisive force in the world. There's a positively excellent video here on YouTube entitled "Why Atheists Care about your Religion" or something of that nature, by GoGreen18. I highly encourage you and everyone else to watch it.
JETZcorp 3 years ago 2
You're wrong.
There's thousands of extremely intelligent christians.
That's what's both sad and scary.
Paulginz 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
he is speaking like a stupid kid , he does not know what is he talking about !
KENT HOVIND would swap the floor with him right here right now , !
blooms125 3 years ago
Not until his parole hearing
daichi2097 3 years ago 5
Haha, nice one daichi
crunchypeanut 3 years ago 2
Kent Hovind would avoid ANY scientific debate at all costs.
wimscheers 3 years ago 2
Set it up. I would love to see that debate.
But since Mr. Hovind is unable to make personal appearances at this time perhaps, if he can get phone privileges at his "government housing" he could call the Atheist Experience at 512-477-2288 between 4:30-6:00 Central Standard Time and take his best shot.
Set that up, will you and tell Dr. Hovind hi for me.
Kafir014 3 years ago 2
blooms125,
Hovind thought dinosaurs and humans lived together... This man wrote several book while your man watched the Flintstones as if it were a documentary.
alandar995 3 years ago
To bad Hovind can't debate in jail.
sandmanreborn 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What can I say? I'm sorry if I've offended you. I specifically searched for atheist videos to post on, that's pretty rude. God does exist though, and I'm compelled to share it with people. Everyone's fine with religions that don't make it an issue whether you believe or not. But as soon as Christ says Lay down your life and follow me, I'm the only Way, people get upset. Can I water it down for you? No, that would negate the enlightenment and salvation Christ offers.
theM3dic 3 years ago
theM3dic
You make a fantastical statement that I must ask you to support. You said,"God does exist..." and I would love you to help myself and other YTers and tell us what sort of evidence you might have for your wild claim. Thanks, in advance.
saxmanchiro 3 years ago
please, can you share your evidence for a god with us petty nonbelievers? if it is rational, i will convert on the spot.
sammygee17 3 years ago
The most hated argument people use against me boils down to this: it's complicated, so god did it!!
Love the analogy.
NusquamNihil 3 years ago 4
only islam can answer all your questions richard! But you should be punished for redicule islam you bastard!
samgee2007 3 years ago
oh common now - you know that you got a chuckle out of that one right before you did the whole stoic "you shall be punished!" line...
1n354a 3 years ago
I reckon my dog can give better answers than you and your god.
Dorfkanal 3 years ago
hahaha islam sucks
majorvoltage 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The point is not that God is gravity, but that if the gravitational constant (G) didn't fall within a certain finite range which is within the infinite range of all real numbers the universe would not exist. G too small then stars never form, G too big the universe collapses before heavy metal elements (rock) can form. Without God...that's like RANDOMLY throwing a dart at an INFINITELY large dart board AND getting the bulls-eye. infinity:1 odds. God is in charge, now you know. ;)
theM3dic 3 years ago
Too bad infinite isn't a number.
BMFTheJag22 3 years ago
them3dic,
The flaw in your logic is that you fail to realise that each of those numbers on which the gravitational constant can fall have equal chances of being chosen. If we take your dartboard analogy, each random throw of a dart has the equal chance to hit the bulls-eye. Another example is winning a competition in which millions of people entered. The odds are extremely high, yet everyone has the same chance of winning, and someone has to win. Improbable doesn't mean impossible.
kcdjyhd 3 years ago 2
my problem with that approach is that you can not show that god even exists, that god has the ability to control gravitational forces, where god came from, how YOU are able to know all these things about god...
it seems that you just took "I don't know" and slapped a face/name on it...
1n354a 3 years ago 5
I don't mean to appear to support religion, so sorry if it appears as though I'm baiting. I'm just tossing out an idea.
Sinuev1 3 years ago
Dawkins says that he can imagine "God like beings", but that they would not be gods since they are a product of the universe, not the creator of it.
In a very limited and primitive sense, we can already create universes via simulation. Would a simulated intelligence in a simulated environment be able to figure out that it was a simulation? Would the man or team who created the simulation, be considered it's god?
Is it easier for an atheist to imagine the concept of god in those terms?
Sinuev1 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's a beautiful concept. But I think the answer is no. Atheists don't like God because they love to be self destructive and/or prideful and God has things to say about both of those. If everyone pointed their moral compasses toward God because they loved Him oh what a wonderful world it would be. And don't give me any crap about stoning people, you know youre misinterpreting things to please yourself. Just go straight to the part where Jesus says, Love God, Love others. It's most important.
theM3dic 3 years ago
you clearly have no idea what you are talking about. please leave, and come back with some education.
theREALshafan 3 years ago 6
You don't know shit. All christians don't know shit. You do realize that your whole religion is probably only 20% of what true christianity is (i mean like the instant the religion started). If you want to talk about misinterpreting things to please yourself, then i advice you to stop. You are the last person who should say something like that. i would bet you money that most atheists are more moral than christians, and it is simply because we are smart enough to decide on our own what is right.
dawsoninja 3 years ago 3
you are so incredibly ridicules that i cant answer you, except to look at you and wonder how you made it this far in life , do you remember the movie dum and dumer , well they where brain surgeons compared too you .
adlerbr12 3 years ago 4
"Atheists don't like God because they love to be self destructive and/or prideful and God has things to say about both of those"
What a galactically ignorant, naive, dogmatic, foolish, pious, sanctimonious and downright stupid thing to say. Loving Jesus doesn't give you any awareness of reality, does it theM3dic?
stalwartatheist 3 years ago 3
Yes, i'm atheist because i love doing self destructive things. Thats why 2 weeks ago i changed an elderly womans tire in -10 degree weather and told her to keep her money.
You're an ignorant asshole. you're the type of christian i hate the most. The type that nit picks the bible so all you read are things like, love thy neighbor, honor they father. Not..Kill your son if he speaks against you, or stone a person for having mixed threads in their clothing.
Dgc2003 3 years ago 6
all hail the weasel frog!!!!
jassi4010709 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
TYPO FIX:
To think that a 747 DID NOT came into existance by thinking... by imagination and a plan is just folly. It is a
system by design. From a belief rooted in the head of a human. It did not assemble by chance.
jnrolf 3 years ago
Do 747s reproduce with genetic variation, you stupid son of a bitch?
CadicusTheDamned 3 years ago