@noahboa9258 The earlier in the periodic table an element is, the lighter it weighs. Sodium is the third-lightest metal, after lithium and beryllium, but sodium is much more common than both of those.
@engelteir I was wondering what the gas produced was myself. Then I thought it might just be that the reaction is exothermic so the liquid bubbles like it's boiling... not sure though.
@oomblikkies Mercury's outer shell is a 6s orbital. Since the s orbital is extremely close to the nucleus, it is tightly bound by it. This causes a "reluctance" for the mercury to release electrons necessary for metallic bonding and thus causes the bonds between mercury atoms to be very weak. This weak bond allows mercury to be liquid at room temperature.
@oomblikkies If you are unsure about spdf notation, you should be below GCSE A-level standard and a simpler explanation is just that the electrons in mercury are not fully used in bonding. A lower energy bond brings about a lower melting and boiling point.
High Pressure sodium lamps use a mercury-sodium amalgam, the mercury allows the arc to be more uniform, plus it is in a less reactive form than pure sodium. By the way for those who don't know, sodium lamps are the yellow streetlights. She forgot to mention that little use of Na/Hg. Very cool demonstration though! Thanks.
interesting video, but a HUGE disservice by incorrectly stating that not a lot of mercury is released from dental amalgam fillings.
In the Executive Summary of this document (WHO 2003), WHO clearly states “Dental amalgam constitutes a potentially significant source of exposure to elemental mercury, with estimates of daily intake from amalgam restorations ranging from 1 to 27 μg/day.”
Placing and Removing amalgams improperly exposes the patient to HUGE amounts of mercury vapor
The Professor has mentioned in earlier videos that his wife is from a scientific family. So, sacrificing romance for lab safety is likely not an unusual concept for her. That said, awwwwww, it is a little bit sad nonetheless.
*cringes at all the dental talk* *shiver* No, thank you. I'll keep my cavity free, amalgam free, dentist avoiding teeth, please! *shudders from odontophobia*
mercury ions stall the growth cones in your brain, and are hard to remove (they don't metabolize out). i'm sure filling aren't too bad, but i doubt they're a brilliant idea if there are alternatives. amalgams are also useful for chemistry because they activate self passivating metals into injecting electrons into other compounds. drug labs use tinfoil / mercury salts to aminate the amphetAMINES (speed / ecstasy / meth etc). think about that when you're handed a colourful heap of drugs. :P
Funny how many things go wrong in this video, getting stuck to the tape and the scalpel snapping off. I'm glad they kept this in the final cut it made it much better.
... everyone), the long time over which the fillings leach out place a ceiling on exposure. Not so with those who go and get their fillings removed... and in the process, inhale more mercury vapour in a single minute than they would have otherwise consumed over thirty years. Yes, let us all avoid mercury like the plague. I mean, it's not like heavy metal poisoning is treatable or anything... oh wait.
All people wanting to ban mercury fillings shows me is that they understand neither chemistry nor biology. Mercury is bioaccumulative... but this does not mean that small amounts over a long period of time is bad for you; it means that any amount you consume is stored in your body for a long period of time. As such, inhaling a large amount at one time is FAR worse for you than small amounts over a longer period; though people with amalgam fillings will have some mercury in their system (like...)
small amounts of mercury will not hurt you unless you're sensitive to it. not only is it used in filling,its also used as a preservative in some medicines,like vaccinations. the people who get "go insane" are people who are exposed to large amounts, like hatters back in the day, and people who made Ormolu clocks.
The CDC released a statement declaring dental amalgam to be the main contributor of mercury in the human body. Preganant women and children under six aren't allowed to receive these fillings, yet a 7 year old can have 11 of them. Saying these fillings aren't dangerous is harmful to public health and awareness. You would think common sense would tell us the most toxic non-radioactive substance is not for a place for our mouth. What rules everything around you? Money.
Mercury is by FAR not the most toxic non-radioactive substance, particularly in its metallic form. Examples include Botulinum Toxin, various organophosphates such as VX, Batrachotoxin, etc...
Organomercury compounds like Dimethylmercury may be extremely toxic, but even if they were "the most toxic non-radioative substance", that is still totally different to metallic mercury.
There are other ways to fix teeth, mercury, in any form, should not be in our bodies. I'm aware that there are trace amounts in water and food but that's not the issue. Adding more and polluting our systems is bad, it will store in our cells forever.
Is there a list of all periodic elements that are soluble or will amalgamate with mercury? I read that iron and platinum are the only elements that will not amalgamate with mercury. Why is this the case?
I love how a bunch of seemingly well-educated people sat here arguing with each other over amalgam fillings when it doesn't matter at all. And we wonder why normal people don't listen to the scientific community when it warns them about real dangers. I don't know what you lot do for a living, but stay out of science. Fools who make scientific debate personal have no purpose in the field.
I'm glad you mentioned that the mercury doesn't leach from amalgam fillings in harmful quantities. There has been a lot of pseudoscience surrounding this issue and it's good to see that you didn't sidestep it. Thank you.
Yeah.. there's something decidedly kinky about Debbies dirty labcoat! LOL I always thought their whites were always well... white... One thing though, at least you can tell who's been doing the most work!! :)
What's your evidence? Screeds on crackpot "alternative medicine" websites? It must be pretty small harm, given how many people have amalgam fillings and how little it seems to do. I'm not aware of an epidemic of people dropping dead in the street because of their fillings! LOL!
Good point johnclavis, what's the scientific evidence of people perishing from amalgam fillings?! Mercury is used so much out of context these days, in the wrong situation and amount even oxygen can be a poison.
Show me a way to test for interactions of hundreds of chemicals on your body at once from pollution, fillings, plastic packaging and tons more, I'll show you proof or disproof. Since it's impossible to test for the reactions of all of the chemicals your body is currently interacting with, I'd instead ask for the removal of likely dangerous compounds until proven safe instead. Much more crackpot to ignore possible harm to the planet or the plants and animals living here.
That is ignorance. We are only talking about mercury here and it's certainly possible to test for the reactions of chemicals. The sciences are called chemistry and molecular biology. Look it up. In this case there is no harm. It is impossible and illogical to prove a negative though, have you considered that the reason you can't find a harm is because, there is no harm?! If you make a claim the burden of proof is on your shoulders.
If not then I can say there is a a deadly invisible meteor coming our way, hey it is impossible to know all the rocks out there and you can't prove me wrong so let's all go underground until proven otherwise.
Um yes, it is possible to test for reactions of chemicals, but let me cast some doubt on your assurances. How many people (if any) are tested for all the possible negative chemical reactions out there (mercury included), and secondly are there not limits to these tests?
If something is toxic in theory then lets find an alternative to it unless we can improve on the theory.
You are claiming mercury fillings are safe. The FDA and CDC disagrees with you. Science is not on your side anymore, at least as far as this issue is concerned. I recommend that you investigate this issue further or provide me proof since the burden is on you.
You say this: "Since it's impossible to test for the reactions of all of the chemicals your body is currently interacting with, I'd instead ask for the removal of likely dangerous compounds until proven safe instead."
I want to ask you: if a specific problem has not been established, from where do you get the basis to call something "likely dangerous"? On what basis do you say amalgam is "likely dangerous" other than the naive notion that "mercury=BAD"?
well actualy chemists almost never wash their lab coats, because as soon as you do wash it you get only schreds out of the washing machine. thats chemistry for ya.
Very interesting. I always thought an amalgum was just a mixture of the two elements rather like an alloy. I didn't realise there was a chemical reaction.
Yeah, actually that was an oversimplification on my part. Generally, an exothermic reaction occurs when chemical bonds are being formed. That isn't exactly the case here, even though it is exothermic. In an amalgam, mercury and another metal form structures, but the length between the atoms is greater than it is with covalent bonds. So instead of reactants > products + heat, as in an exothermic chemical reaction, it's metals > metals held closely together + heat. Pretty close though, I guess.
Also, in the particular case of sodium, the structure is pretty compact, with sodium atoms grouping with two mercury atoms. It would be rather arbitrary not to call that a chemical structure. It's different from the ones I'm used to, but it's there.
My chem profs used to say how they used to be up to their elbows and armpits with hexane and bromine and nothing ever happened to them. They're still carcinogenic and mercury is still a neurotoxin.
I think this rumour can only come from the fact that in the US dentist alway try to make everyones teeth as perfectly symetrical as possible because the fashion is to have a smile like Juila Roberts. Where as here most NHS dentists will do the bear minimum required to keep teeth in order. So sometimes you get interestingly shaped teeth formation.
sodium is very reactive, and it DOES react with argon, but as you stated argon is inert, but there is still a small amount of reactivity, just not as noticeable :)
Although chemistry aint my bag , I'm still fascinated by it. Is it possible that the heat generated by the exothermic reaction between Mercury and Sodium could ignite the Hexane vapour that would be swirling around in the local atmosphere, hence the Argon, which is also playing a part in not oxidising the sodium?
The nerd in me just checked the flashpoint of hexane which is -23.33 deg C, I imagine a small amount of that vapour in a confined space like that could cause quite a bang should it have access to the third part of the triangle. Obviously not enough to blast the lab to bits but enough to possibly rupture the container and cause a complicated mess to clean up afterwards.
Sodium can ignite hexane, especially in humid air (I have seen it happen) but there is no danger here as argon is heavier than air so excludes all oxygen even with the open top). Another thing: hexane evaporates rapidly and it only takes a few seconds of waving the sodium around on your tweezers for most of it to evaporate away. As we would hope, her technique is quite safe.
I guess the Hexane that vapourized when the Sodium got dissolved + some Sodium because of the exothermic reaction. Mind that you don't need much metal vapour to get such a layer on the glass.
That's good to know re: teeth fillings because I got 2 fillings when I was quite young in Poland - which I guess wasn't THAT long ago since I'm 26. I was kind of scared about that poisoning me lol :P :)
Re - Teeth: Small amounts of mercury vapour are produced by amalgams every time you chew your food. Rather than risk any potential neuro toxic effects from mercury, I think the dental industry should move on to wiser alternatives. Also I think different people have different tolerances to small levels of mercury. Great vid.
So how does one get one's metal OUT of an amalgam, if one chooses. I know they must be able to do it with gold, because mercury to form an amalgam is (or was) used is small-scale gold mining
lol Debbie, i never cut my sunday roast with a SCALPEL, but nice idea. :-)
i once mixed gallium and mercury, and it produced a horrible, stain-leaving but liquid (at room temp) mess. i dont suppose this could be of any use, now could it? =)
If you are referring to the fizz that happens when sodium is dropped in, I believe that this is mercury evaporating as a consequence of the heat generated from the exothermic reaction. This may cause the mercury vapour to condense into grey droplets in a mist, before falling back into the liquid compound. That is what I think the greyish cloud is.
I'm also guessing the hexane liquid coating each chunk evaporates. So, I think that the crud she describes is a mixture oxidised sodium and hexane.
calvinhobbesliker2 I never said the mercury boiled. I said that it was evaporating. Enough energy can be transferred between molecules to form a vapour in liquids far below their boiling point. This is why you can see a mist in your breath on a cold day.
At room temp mercury gives of toxic fumes, and so one must be careful not to inhale.
I imagine quite a lot of heat is generated but it is dispersed quite readily. This is why I anticipate that the surplus energy is enough to cause evaporation.
@gerstners because in a dentists specific case, if he had to differentiate between the two, it would quickly make disposing of such chemicals a seriously expensive task.
I asked a questiion a while ago but havent' had an answer yet. Have you managed to find out how much power the superconducting magnet consumes? I'd really, really, really, REALLY like to know! :)
@ArtificialCleverenAI: Sorry I don't know this... However I do know if the superconducting magnet in the university's biggest MRI scanner is switched off, it costs £30,000 to re-start it!!!! Unsurprisingly, they leave it on 24 hours a day.
Comment removed
adityagnet 1 week ago
Do you really need the magnetic bar to stir the mercury? I think it will stir alone, by MHD.
tvalerianopereira 2 weeks ago
Well hello there Debbie, I've got my ion you lol
bloodscale3 2 weeks ago
cool video :) thank you
siroatmeal 3 weeks ago
Calm it you randy chemistry lovers ;) We don't all need to know your feelings for debbie!
Boredom2989 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
noahboa9258 1 month ago
@noahboa9258 Yeah it was one gram.
andrewkiwi100 1 month ago
@andrewkiwi100 wow, sodium's pretty light
noahboa9258 1 month ago
@noahboa9258 The earlier in the periodic table an element is, the lighter it weighs. Sodium is the third-lightest metal, after lithium and beryllium, but sodium is much more common than both of those.
andrewkiwi100 1 month ago
@andrewkiwi100 well yeah i know that, but i didnt expect it to be THAT light :)
noahboa9258 1 month ago
thats one ugly ass tooth
zombiesarescary 1 month ago
whats the gas that comes of as it dissolves?
engelteir 3 months ago
@engelteir I was wondering what the gas produced was myself. Then I thought it might just be that the reaction is exothermic so the liquid bubbles like it's boiling... not sure though.
andrewkiwi100 1 month ago
Why is mercury a liquid?
oomblikkies 4 months ago
@oomblikkies Mercury's outer shell is a 6s orbital. Since the s orbital is extremely close to the nucleus, it is tightly bound by it. This causes a "reluctance" for the mercury to release electrons necessary for metallic bonding and thus causes the bonds between mercury atoms to be very weak. This weak bond allows mercury to be liquid at room temperature.
Aviatorsmith 3 months ago
@oomblikkies If you are unsure about spdf notation, you should be below GCSE A-level standard and a simpler explanation is just that the electrons in mercury are not fully used in bonding. A lower energy bond brings about a lower melting and boiling point.
Aviatorsmith 3 months ago
Debbie's lab coat has seen plenty of action!
KittySN 4 months ago
Anyone else see the really grubby guy at 5:55?
itsmanofpopsicle 5 months ago
of course he has a weding ring, he's THE professor
pctiu 5 months ago
5:55 Ohai Jack Black
OOZ662 6 months ago
That lab coat needs a dunk in H2O and a surfactant ;)
ezasad 6 months ago
A redhead chemist with dimples... I'm in love.
MackTuesday 7 months ago
Sodium: A little stickier than roast beef.
MackTuesday 7 months ago 3
any one notice shes wearing a wedding ring when handling mercury
Seth1210 9 months ago 3
Could you also do a bit on distilling mercury.
ConorC96 11 months ago
High Pressure sodium lamps use a mercury-sodium amalgam, the mercury allows the arc to be more uniform, plus it is in a less reactive form than pure sodium. By the way for those who don't know, sodium lamps are the yellow streetlights. She forgot to mention that little use of Na/Hg. Very cool demonstration though! Thanks.
punishedexistence 11 months ago
very good looking scientist at your collage, i wanna go there.. guess that's y the prof's wife THINKS he's a chemist
isrealjason 11 months ago
very good looking scientist at your collage, i wanna go there
isrealjason 11 months ago
interesting video, but a HUGE disservice by incorrectly stating that not a lot of mercury is released from dental amalgam fillings.
In the Executive Summary of this document (WHO 2003), WHO clearly states “Dental amalgam constitutes a potentially significant source of exposure to elemental mercury, with estimates of daily intake from amalgam restorations ranging from 1 to 27 μg/day.”
Placing and Removing amalgams improperly exposes the patient to HUGE amounts of mercury vapor
MercuryExposure 11 months ago
Thank you for zooming in on that fantastic looking tooth. I think I will not eat another snickers again.
ijunkie 11 months ago
My science teacher was talking about how she dipped her wedding ring into mercury to demonstrate that gold is very unreactive
she didn't understand why the ring changed colour and put it down to her ring not being pure gold
i only just saw this video a few weeks after leaving year 10 D: she'll never know
TechXMarine 1 year ago
i love his hair
TheMaxcooldude 1 year ago
your handling mercury and you have a wedding ring OH NO
gaswerti 1 year ago 3
...mercury IS bad for you.
But you are ignoring the fact that we all are constantly exposed to mercury, tuna fish for example has mercury in it and so do vaccines.
Things which I think we all take, except if you are some paranoid loony, In which case disregard this comment It will only make things worse for you.
TheIonlycomment 1 year ago
The Professor has mentioned in earlier videos that his wife is from a scientific family. So, sacrificing romance for lab safety is likely not an unusual concept for her. That said, awwwwww, it is a little bit sad nonetheless.
*cringes at all the dental talk* *shiver* No, thank you. I'll keep my cavity free, amalgam free, dentist avoiding teeth, please! *shudders from odontophobia*
pepsibookcat 1 year ago
mercury ions stall the growth cones in your brain, and are hard to remove (they don't metabolize out). i'm sure filling aren't too bad, but i doubt they're a brilliant idea if there are alternatives. amalgams are also useful for chemistry because they activate self passivating metals into injecting electrons into other compounds. drug labs use tinfoil / mercury salts to aminate the amphetAMINES (speed / ecstasy / meth etc). think about that when you're handed a colourful heap of drugs. :P
lexichronicle2 1 year ago
Smart chicks are HOT!. too bas she is wearing a wedding ring. especially while handling mercury :)
TheTork 1 year ago
Is that a mercury mist that arises when the sodium dissolves?
AVincent2 1 year ago
Funny how many things go wrong in this video, getting stuck to the tape and the scalpel snapping off. I'm glad they kept this in the final cut it made it much better.
AVincent2 1 year ago
... everyone), the long time over which the fillings leach out place a ceiling on exposure. Not so with those who go and get their fillings removed... and in the process, inhale more mercury vapour in a single minute than they would have otherwise consumed over thirty years. Yes, let us all avoid mercury like the plague. I mean, it's not like heavy metal poisoning is treatable or anything... oh wait.
alchimistenz 1 year ago
@alchimistenz cancer is treatable too. would you like a sniff of some PCBs?
lexichronicle2 1 year ago
Comment removed
alchimistenz 1 year ago
All people wanting to ban mercury fillings shows me is that they understand neither chemistry nor biology. Mercury is bioaccumulative... but this does not mean that small amounts over a long period of time is bad for you; it means that any amount you consume is stored in your body for a long period of time. As such, inhaling a large amount at one time is FAR worse for you than small amounts over a longer period; though people with amalgam fillings will have some mercury in their system (like...)
alchimistenz 1 year ago
i wonder whose teeth was that and what did he/she eat!!!!!!!!!
kvive72 1 year ago
small amounts of mercury will not hurt you unless you're sensitive to it. not only is it used in filling,its also used as a preservative in some medicines,like vaccinations. the people who get "go insane" are people who are exposed to large amounts, like hatters back in the day, and people who made Ormolu clocks.
Gmc42082 1 year ago
By the way, what is the maximum amount of sodium that can be dissolved in the mercury?
Randommelon 1 year ago
Debbie is hot!
lthnnpwr 2 years ago 28
The CDC released a statement declaring dental amalgam to be the main contributor of mercury in the human body. Preganant women and children under six aren't allowed to receive these fillings, yet a 7 year old can have 11 of them. Saying these fillings aren't dangerous is harmful to public health and awareness. You would think common sense would tell us the most toxic non-radioactive substance is not for a place for our mouth. What rules everything around you? Money.
fetalbetal 2 years ago
Mercury is by FAR not the most toxic non-radioactive substance, particularly in its metallic form. Examples include Botulinum Toxin, various organophosphates such as VX, Batrachotoxin, etc...
Organomercury compounds like Dimethylmercury may be extremely toxic, but even if they were "the most toxic non-radioative substance", that is still totally different to metallic mercury.
Randommelon 1 year ago
There are other ways to fix teeth, mercury, in any form, should not be in our bodies. I'm aware that there are trace amounts in water and food but that's not the issue. Adding more and polluting our systems is bad, it will store in our cells forever.
fetalbetal 1 year ago
MORE DEBBIE
barkulator 2 years ago 19
I like the way the crazy haired professor talks. :3
olishant 2 years ago
What is the grey mist that forms? Gaseous mercury?
HairLikeCottonCandy 2 years ago
Nevermind, it is gaseous mercury (mercury vapor), so says the post farther down the line.
HairLikeCottonCandy 2 years ago
Is there a list of all periodic elements that are soluble or will amalgamate with mercury? I read that iron and platinum are the only elements that will not amalgamate with mercury. Why is this the case?
W1049 2 years ago
Watch out, there's a creepy guy staring at you at 5:54
culwin 2 years ago 4
No kidding lol. wth!
wrnchhead76 2 years ago
Liquid Hg and no fume hood - crazy Nottingham chemist ;)
muhkuh77 2 years ago
What is the gas, that's been formedd when she drops the sodium into the mercury? Is this gaseous mercury?
metalheadrowi 2 years ago
yes its called mercury vapor.
humanentropy 2 years ago
Again great video, really well done bringing this to the tube
leokimvideo 2 years ago 2
I love how a bunch of seemingly well-educated people sat here arguing with each other over amalgam fillings when it doesn't matter at all. And we wonder why normal people don't listen to the scientific community when it warns them about real dangers. I don't know what you lot do for a living, but stay out of science. Fools who make scientific debate personal have no purpose in the field.
8bitlove2a03 2 years ago 6
"Well she thinks I'm a Chemist" HA! You cat you!
PosVibeMerc 2 years ago
Not!
jnrolf 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice work. keep it up. mean time come for social media marketing for esteembpo**com
titalminarisa 2 years ago
I'm glad you mentioned that the mercury doesn't leach from amalgam fillings in harmful quantities. There has been a lot of pseudoscience surrounding this issue and it's good to see that you didn't sidestep it. Thank you.
saintaureus 2 years ago
Smart girls turn me on, and intimidate me.
alcany 2 years ago 2
not me...
gnrfanatic141414 2 years ago
Yeah.. there's something decidedly kinky about Debbies dirty labcoat! LOL I always thought their whites were always well... white... One thing though, at least you can tell who's been doing the most work!! :)
Wonin6billion 2 years ago
My dentists WILL NOT use amalgams! Thank GOD!
jnrolf 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What's God got to do with it? o_O
Wonin6billion 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He made pirckley dawkinest like you and puppies... as well as pussy... 8)
jnrolf 2 years ago
i liked the part where ths student removed his fillings and put plastic ones insted
kellogsdie 2 years ago
Great! Blue Peter for chemists, "Here is one I made earlier" Interesting to see you using Hexane which is virtually banned in industry where I work.
seustaceRotterdam 2 years ago
She's absolutely gorgeous and YAY brains!!
SuperFinGuy 2 years ago 3
I though dentists didnt used amalgams anymore.
Then i was wrong.
But i think i've read somewhere that the fillings that they use today are more resistant than the teeths itselfs.
Draxis32 2 years ago
I hate to break it to you, but the mercury in teeth fillings /does/ harm you. :)
sakura101avalon 2 years ago
What's your evidence? Screeds on crackpot "alternative medicine" websites? It must be pretty small harm, given how many people have amalgam fillings and how little it seems to do. I'm not aware of an epidemic of people dropping dead in the street because of their fillings! LOL!
johnclavis 2 years ago
Good point johnclavis, what's the scientific evidence of people perishing from amalgam fillings?! Mercury is used so much out of context these days, in the wrong situation and amount even oxygen can be a poison.
SuperFinGuy 2 years ago
Show me a way to test for interactions of hundreds of chemicals on your body at once from pollution, fillings, plastic packaging and tons more, I'll show you proof or disproof. Since it's impossible to test for the reactions of all of the chemicals your body is currently interacting with, I'd instead ask for the removal of likely dangerous compounds until proven safe instead. Much more crackpot to ignore possible harm to the planet or the plants and animals living here.
v8media 2 years ago
That is ignorance. We are only talking about mercury here and it's certainly possible to test for the reactions of chemicals. The sciences are called chemistry and molecular biology. Look it up. In this case there is no harm. It is impossible and illogical to prove a negative though, have you considered that the reason you can't find a harm is because, there is no harm?! If you make a claim the burden of proof is on your shoulders.
SuperFinGuy 2 years ago
If not then I can say there is a a deadly invisible meteor coming our way, hey it is impossible to know all the rocks out there and you can't prove me wrong so let's all go underground until proven otherwise.
SuperFinGuy 2 years ago
Um yes, it is possible to test for reactions of chemicals, but let me cast some doubt on your assurances. How many people (if any) are tested for all the possible negative chemical reactions out there (mercury included), and secondly are there not limits to these tests?
If something is toxic in theory then lets find an alternative to it unless we can improve on the theory.
HairLikeCottonCandy 2 years ago
You are claiming mercury fillings are safe. The FDA and CDC disagrees with you. Science is not on your side anymore, at least as far as this issue is concerned. I recommend that you investigate this issue further or provide me proof since the burden is on you.
fetalbetal 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You say this: "Since it's impossible to test for the reactions of all of the chemicals your body is currently interacting with, I'd instead ask for the removal of likely dangerous compounds until proven safe instead."
I want to ask you: if a specific problem has not been established, from where do you get the basis to call something "likely dangerous"? On what basis do you say amalgam is "likely dangerous" other than the naive notion that "mercury=BAD"?
johnclavis 2 years ago
Very interesting stuff as usual. Thanks ;) Have you any name suggestions for the newly discovered 112 element?
CoolMinty 2 years ago 2
@CoolMinty
We'll be posting The Professor's thoughts on this in the next 24 hours!
periodicvideos 2 years ago 3
@periodicvideos I would be asking Mr./Prof. Poliakov about whether his paternal grandfather was English or not. :@~
jjovereats 11 months ago
I've got an experiment for you, Debs.
How about boil washing that Lab Coat?
Hypothesis:
The washing machine will die.
TableWolfMusic 2 years ago
well actualy chemists almost never wash their lab coats, because as soon as you do wash it you get only schreds out of the washing machine. thats chemistry for ya.
flach99 2 years ago
What are the gas released during dissolution?
bbsonjohn 2 years ago
Very interesting. I always thought an amalgum was just a mixture of the two elements rather like an alloy. I didn't realise there was a chemical reaction.
St00sh13 2 years ago 2
There is not a chemical reaction. The video did not say that.
TheStephenation 2 years ago
"Debs" did say it was an exothermic reaction and that is why the glass container got warm.
St00sh13 2 years ago
Yeah, actually that was an oversimplification on my part. Generally, an exothermic reaction occurs when chemical bonds are being formed. That isn't exactly the case here, even though it is exothermic. In an amalgam, mercury and another metal form structures, but the length between the atoms is greater than it is with covalent bonds. So instead of reactants > products + heat, as in an exothermic chemical reaction, it's metals > metals held closely together + heat. Pretty close though, I guess.
TheStephenation 2 years ago
Also, in the particular case of sodium, the structure is pretty compact, with sodium atoms grouping with two mercury atoms. It would be rather arbitrary not to call that a chemical structure. It's different from the ones I'm used to, but it's there.
TheStephenation 2 years ago
Cool, thanks for the explanation.
St00sh13 2 years ago
there is a reaction you can quite clearly see there is a reaction!
voiceofreason2008 2 years ago
OMG that chemist is hot! and I am not talking about the one with the funky hair.
TheOptickid 2 years ago 2
My chem profs used to say how they used to be up to their elbows and armpits with hexane and bromine and nothing ever happened to them. They're still carcinogenic and mercury is still a neurotoxin.
DrBones666 2 years ago
Hexane is not a known carcinogen. Neither is bromine, for that matter, but it's highly corrosive anyway.
TheStephenation 2 years ago
lol at 1:22
kpshc707 2 years ago
LOL, he said the mercury dissolves slowly, so it doesn't "really" hurt people.
Keyword really.
jarjarbinks77 2 years ago
It sublimates. It can be detected with a mercury vapor meter.
Mercury is a neurotoxin at low doses so sorry prof. On this you are wrong.
DrBones666 2 years ago
still loving the proffs head!!!!
and the periodic table
thx
paranorma1palace 2 years ago 4
Smart girls turn me on/ intimidat me.
alcany 2 years ago 20
''she thinks im a chemist'' lol!
tiapon 2 years ago 33
I Love The Professor ^^
Chemistry<3 ^_^
IWantLandingSnow 2 years ago 5
Teehee, she said crud XD. Sorry, I'm a very juvenile person :). It was a cool video and the Prof's hair is as amazing as ever!
sporkafife 2 years ago
they bathe soy beans in Hexane before we eat it. Awesome!!!
archaedemos 2 years ago
But Debbie does wear her (wedding)ring in the lab!
5*
Stiebel 2 years ago 2
In most of the offices in the united states they don't use mercury any more, they just do the plastic ones now...
austenwack 2 years ago
the uk has dentists??
wodnerduck 2 years ago
Ha Ha funny, not.
I dont understand why people dont think brits have dentists...
cjpendleton1993 2 years ago 5
Wait a second....they do?
hugohugo37 2 years ago
I think this rumour can only come from the fact that in the US dentist alway try to make everyones teeth as perfectly symetrical as possible because the fashion is to have a smile like Juila Roberts. Where as here most NHS dentists will do the bear minimum required to keep teeth in order. So sometimes you get interestingly shaped teeth formation.
grnlfe01 2 years ago 6
Brains + Cute = Scintillating Video
She could expound on polymers and I'd learn via osmosis.
doverlin 2 years ago 4
sodium is very reactive, and it DOES react with argon, but as you stated argon is inert, but there is still a small amount of reactivity, just not as noticeable :)
woodesroger 2 years ago
Although chemistry aint my bag , I'm still fascinated by it. Is it possible that the heat generated by the exothermic reaction between Mercury and Sodium could ignite the Hexane vapour that would be swirling around in the local atmosphere, hence the Argon, which is also playing a part in not oxidising the sodium?
Wonin6billion 2 years ago
The nerd in me just checked the flashpoint of hexane which is -23.33 deg C, I imagine a small amount of that vapour in a confined space like that could cause quite a bang should it have access to the third part of the triangle. Obviously not enough to blast the lab to bits but enough to possibly rupture the container and cause a complicated mess to clean up afterwards.
Wonin6billion 2 years ago
Sodium can ignite hexane, especially in humid air (I have seen it happen) but there is no danger here as argon is heavier than air so excludes all oxygen even with the open top). Another thing: hexane evaporates rapidly and it only takes a few seconds of waving the sodium around on your tweezers for most of it to evaporate away. As we would hope, her technique is quite safe.
Neilidity 2 years ago
Sodium does not react with argon.
TheStephenation 2 years ago
IS that where the word amalgamation comes from?
sharperguy 2 years ago
i believe so :)
woodesroger 2 years ago
ah! that makes so much sense, thank you!
do you know what the smoke stuff was that fizzed when the sodium reacted with the mercury
LaughinWarheads 2 years ago
I guess the Hexane that vapourized when the Sodium got dissolved + some Sodium because of the exothermic reaction. Mind that you don't need much metal vapour to get such a layer on the glass.
ThatGuyFromAustria 2 years ago
oh ok, got it.
LaughinWarheads 2 years ago
ohh shes so pretty =3
SalchichaPolaca 2 years ago 3
^_^ what fun
Jtking3000 2 years ago
That's good to know re: teeth fillings because I got 2 fillings when I was quite young in Poland - which I guess wasn't THAT long ago since I'm 26. I was kind of scared about that poisoning me lol :P :)
UkrainkaIvanka 2 years ago
I absolutely love these videos!
jalgjalg 2 years ago 3
Wow, I didn't know you could dissolve metals into mercury! Nice video! Thanks
NAMLegolas 2 years ago
why was there argon gas with the mercury? Is that the gas that fizzed out when the sodium went in?
LaughinWarheads 2 years ago
Nice video once again, excellent work, team!
ranjitechno 2 years ago
Very nice video!
I had no idea what an amalgam really was. Very informative.
TheaViridis 2 years ago
Re - Teeth: Small amounts of mercury vapour are produced by amalgams every time you chew your food. Rather than risk any potential neuro toxic effects from mercury, I think the dental industry should move on to wiser alternatives. Also I think different people have different tolerances to small levels of mercury. Great vid.
itsabomberscope 2 years ago 2
So how does one get one's metal OUT of an amalgam, if one chooses. I know they must be able to do it with gold, because mercury to form an amalgam is (or was) used is small-scale gold mining
GetMeThere1 2 years ago
lol Debbie, i never cut my sunday roast with a SCALPEL, but nice idea. :-)
i once mixed gallium and mercury, and it produced a horrible, stain-leaving but liquid (at room temp) mess. i dont suppose this could be of any use, now could it? =)
bionerd23 2 years ago
aww, these nerds are the coolest.
schumannsch 2 years ago
soo much.. poisonous material... o.o
Fzzzt! I bet those fumes could kill you... slowly...
Paxmax 2 years ago
What do they do with that mixture after they are finished?
BassmasterBling 2 years ago
what's that grayish cloud that appears when u start or stop the magnetic stirrer?
greeneyedgeek 2 years ago
If you are referring to the fizz that happens when sodium is dropped in, I believe that this is mercury evaporating as a consequence of the heat generated from the exothermic reaction. This may cause the mercury vapour to condense into grey droplets in a mist, before falling back into the liquid compound. That is what I think the greyish cloud is.
I'm also guessing the hexane liquid coating each chunk evaporates. So, I think that the crud she describes is a mixture oxidised sodium and hexane.
TableWolfMusic 2 years ago 2
Mercury boils at 674 degrees F. I don't think THAT much heat wes generated.
calvinhobbesliker2 2 years ago
calvinhobbesliker2 I never said the mercury boiled. I said that it was evaporating. Enough energy can be transferred between molecules to form a vapour in liquids far below their boiling point. This is why you can see a mist in your breath on a cold day.
At room temp mercury gives of toxic fumes, and so one must be careful not to inhale.
I imagine quite a lot of heat is generated but it is dispersed quite readily. This is why I anticipate that the surplus energy is enough to cause evaporation.
TableWolfMusic 2 years ago 2
cool, these videos are evolving from just mere elements to interesting reactions,
I'd like to see some organic chemistry, and pH experiments
Wizard4592 2 years ago
So THAT's what an amalgam is. I knew the word, but didn't know what it meant.
Chipsonfire 2 years ago
Hmmm, you're pooring hexane into your cup like that, I thought i was kind of neurotoxic. We can only use hexane in a fume hood at my school.
jacoman1234567 2 years ago
It is neurotoxic if chronically exposed (e. g. see the effects on solvent abusers).
superdau 2 years ago
"So they dont really harm people (amalgam fillings)" -100% incorrect :)
How wise of Mark.
dionstrezlecki 2 years ago
79th
ooohpie 2 years ago
No worries, mercury amalgams in fillings make no impact on your brain or body
Sharkness77 2 years ago
Then why does OSHA require dentists to dispose of amalgams as toxic wastes?
gerstners 2 years ago
@gerstners because in a dentists specific case, if he had to differentiate between the two, it would quickly make disposing of such chemicals a seriously expensive task.
williamkendrick 2 years ago
"the two"? What "two" are you talking about?
gerstners 2 years ago
Make a film about what happens to waste chemicals from experiments :)
T1carus 2 years ago 6
I edit these films and check they have uploaded to YouTube correctly before making them public.... so technically I am always first! :)
periodicvideos 2 years ago
Lol
DidntKnowWhatToPut1 2 years ago
NOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOO-OOOoooooo!!
.
Anyways..
.
bye bye
jkand 2 years ago
I asked a questiion a while ago but havent' had an answer yet. Have you managed to find out how much power the superconducting magnet consumes? I'd really, really, really, REALLY like to know! :)
ArtificialCleverenAI 2 years ago
@ArtificialCleverenAI: Sorry I don't know this... However I do know if the superconducting magnet in the university's biggest MRI scanner is switched off, it costs £30,000 to re-start it!!!! Unsurprisingly, they leave it on 24 hours a day.
periodicvideos 2 years ago