The big bank theory has much to do with "matter being created or destroyed" ...as in ...where did all that stuff/gas/debris come from that exploded int he big bang? And, admittedly I am not a scientist, nor a science major. I am an intelligent person with a a critical and skeptical mind who does not like to be lied to. I don't like other people being lied to either, because ideas have consequences, and the consequences of believing in Evolution are hatred, racism and violence.
Regarding Australopiticus: Dr. Charles F. Oxnard is a professor in the Departments of Anatomy and Anthropology, According to Dr. Oxnard, his analyses show that Australopithecus was not intermediate between Man and the apes but was uniquely different. He did a computer analysis of the bones found by not only Leakey but also his son, which showed that the creature did not walk upright, and was not a human ancestor.
Have you ever taken logic? There are plenty of viable reasons why many scientists believe the BBT: 1. The professors at most universities and colleges have been taught/trained at secular humanist government universities where they were taught that the BBT and Evolution was a fact; 2. Professors who don't go along with the BBT and E tend not to get hired or tenured;
Wow, your vocabulary! Why don't you take Allah's or Muhammed's or some other supposed diety's name in vain? Why is it always JESUS CHRIST?? I'm not casting anymore pearls.... If you're Biblically literate enough to finish the sentence. You failed to give me any example of transitional forms. You are dreadfully ignorant of the differences between mictro and macro evolution. You ad hominid attacks and other lgoical fallacies...Wow.
Locke, you failed to address anything I wrote in my comment. Please supply ONE transitional form. Give me one example of empirical (or otherwise) proof of macroevolution. As for the ad hominum attack, I did very well in school, being on the Honors list and having a 3.782 gpa. What are these "erroneous connections" I'm trying to make? I suggest you be as skeptical of evolution as you are of everyone who opposes it.
Transitional Forms: Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus, Ardipithecus, Pierolapithecus, Proconsul.
On the point of "empirical evidence" that is simply unrealistic considering the timescales we are dealing with. Empirical evidence is a way of gaining knowledge by means of direct observation or experience. It cannot be observed directly, obviously. I suggest you google "29+ Evidences for Macroevolution"
@slmbluebird The reason people are criticizing your understanding of science is because you are showing a lack of understanding of basic scientific principals. The second law of thermodynamics which you are using is not violated by evolution. See: fsteiger dot com/thermo2
What possible relevant does matter being neither created nor destroyed have with this conversation at all?
@slmbluebird I would also like you to explain why a massive majority of scientists support the big bang model, abiogenesis and evolution by natural selection if it violates scientific principals. These are the people most educated in these principals. Please, read any science textbook before trying to make arguments. Don't tell me you have, because your arguments show that you haven't or that if you have, you haven't understood. Alternatively, you are being intentionally dishonest.
Micro evolution may be an established fact, but Macro Evolution is not. There are no transitional forms. Evolution violates the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum, violates the Laws of Thermodynamics (everything is tending towards disorder; and matter is neither created nor destroyed). You are right that our tax dollars should not be used to fund deceitful curriculum in the schools. That's why the illogical theory (THEORY, not FACT) of Evolution should not be taught.
@slmbluebird It's apparent you didn't pay much attention in school, but that is not an excuse. You can simply use Google to discover what evolution is, what the Theory of Evolution is, and the Laws of Science that you mention. You don't need to be a scientist to see the erroneous connections to try to make. The knowledge gained by just reading the summation of these things is enough to debunk whatever your preacher has been telling you.
@slmbluebird I would encourage you to explain exactly how the theory of evolution by natural selection violates the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum. There is no difference between the mechanics of micro-evolution and macro-evolution. Evolution is simply that mutation (by insertion, deletion or substitution) causes change to genetic code. Natural selection results in lifeforms with beneficial mutations passing on genes while those with harmful mutations not passing on their genes.
The goddamn board of education makes the rest of us Texans look crazy. How the fuck did these idiots even get elected? Jesus christ, I am so fucking mad right now.
@kleb100 Yes, all the generations above us were building generations of ignorance, but there was still progress. It is up to us to regulate progress in this generation.
The worst idiots are in charge for the rest of us,like“state board of education” set the bases for people to follow their footsteps in the field of irrationality,”.If I say that 2+2 makes 4 and I bring you converging EVIDENCE about it,you simply say “no” and have NO EVIDENCE to back up your claims and show me where I’m wrong,you must have some kind of mental defect.Doesn’t matter if you are a biologist, a politician,A TEACHER(!).If you reject all sorts of CONVERGING EVIDENCE,you got problems
Fucking hell, I thought that FrankCastlez guy would never shut the fuck up. That dude is living proof that our education system is in desperate need of reworking.
I never understood this. I went to a publicly funded catholic school from jk to grade 12. We never once debated the fact the universe is billions of years old, my school taught the sciences so well non-catholic students attended for the better academic standard, in fact my priest has even mentioned how ridiculous not believing evolution is. I don't understand the "bible belt" at all.
@Hashime777222 Same with me in my Catholic HS. However, Conservative Christians are very different than Catholics. In fact, most Christians I've encountered have very low opinions on Catholics. They call them pagans due to their Saints...as well as many other titles. Conservative Christians aren't led by a pope, they are led by their ministers in their churches...and they follow quite blindly unfortunately.
@Hashime777222 Over the centuries the catholic church has been in retreat. They argued against any new scientific advances and then grudgingly bowed to the evidence. This aproach is still better than the "bible belt". Their response to overwhelming evidence is to put their fingers in their ears and shout LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU.
Texas Book depository, of course, is where Oswald was when he shot Kennedy.
A perfect metaphor for the South --- and they have been shooting the truth for 80 years, as long as public education has been around to any degree.
The Texas strangle hold on the text books is why most people have no idea how vile the South was, how men like Lee and Davis tortured slave girls -- and regularly sold children, even infants.
"Obama running around and telling everybody that the Republicans want to undo his reforms is a positive message for the Republicans. I mean, undoing Obama's reforms is what everybody wants!" RL
AP}Obama’s turnout pitch to Latinos: Get out there and punish your “enemies”
This is Omegadumbass's Messiah! he sounds alternately fearful, angry, scared. Not exactly qualities of leadership most people look for in a president, but when you’re bitterly clinging to your agendas…
Barrack Obama: I dabbled into Communism. Barrack Obama: I did Cocaine Barrack Obama: I began my political career in a domestic Terrorists (William Ayers) house. Barrack Obama: I attended a Black Nationalist, Racist, church for twenty years. Barrack Obama: My father was a Communist. Barrack Obama: My mother was a Communist. Barrack Obama: I’ve appointed Communists to responsible government posts. Barrack Obama: My mentor (Frank Marshall Davis) as a teen was a Communist
@FrankCastlez I really like how you make up your own quotes and take up a large portion of your 500 characters repeating the president's name between each one. Very nice- it has all of the cadence of a religious ceremony or a propaganda piece. It's too bad that you are personally too stupid to get into that line of work full time- I am sure one of your republicunts... excuse me... tea baggers would snatch you right up.
Do you fear/hate all black people this much or just the ones in charge? :D
@FrankCastlez Hey buttplug, you can talk to me instead of about me thanks very much. I notice that you decided to use the old scary middle name trick- nice one jackass! Especially coming from someone who is using the name of a psychotic vigilante that murders with passion and wears a skull on his chest.
I am actually really enjoying embarrassing and exposing you as an idiotic cowardly charlatan. Keep the material coming, you're like Glenn Beck only more pathetic.
@TheOmegadumbass has nothing but epithets and leftist blathering!
yawn..
Obama lies:
"we will launch a sweepig effort to root out waste, inefficiency, and unnecessary spending by the govt. and every american can see where our money is being spent!!"
Gawd this has to be one of the biggest bullshit lines this leftist ass has ever said!!
@FrankCastlez Just following your lead. Way to listen to Rush and almost word for word write his schtick here. Who's pathetic?
Oh and you say you believe in a reduced government, but you are willing to have government make decisions in all American bedrooms, hospital rooms, science labs- that they have no right or qualification to make.
Ahh you like the word blather? Your welcome, maybe you can learn more words from me. Keep it coming silly McCarthyist. You make my point better than me.
@FrankCastlez I can only assume that you are not speaking of my angle. I find it amusing that one such as you would find the courage to call me obtuse and pathetic, all the while proving that you are brainwashed by the dumbest people in the media and blowing impossibly huge amounts of hot air onto one small comment section of youtube.
@FrankCastlez Aww you sound as though your spirit is broken. I thought your kind was immune to evidence but you almost seem to realizing that everyone is discounting you as a loon. Come on now Francis, buck up! You aren't done spouting your ultra-neo-con bullshit are you? I was sure that you'd have a lot more for us!
I mean of course you failed, even at appearing smug, but that's no reason to quit. Then again, being wrong is a reason to, so maybe you should. I'm no good at pep talks am I... ;)
@FrankCastlez You keep using that "making assertions" argument but I think that you just like using the word assertions because you seem to think that it makes you seem more intelligent, which it really doesn't. And as I have said several times here- just following your lead fascist. You are easy to mock and that is your fault.
@FrankCastlez It's amazing how nearly every person on Youtube who criticizes President Obama thinks it ingeniously clever to make a play on his name like "Odumber." Is it just that you don't think your criticism can stand on its own or are you actually twelve years-old? I notice your YouTube channel page also features a graphic of Obama with the words "100% Douchebag." Do you realize how unserious and juvenile this makes you look?
@sleepapnea If the politics of you Leftists weren't so obviously indefensible, then you wouldn't have to publicly debase yourselves so often trying to hide from them.
@FrankCastlez Once again... My username is "sleepcity" so you think it infinitely witty to refer to me as "sleepapnea"? Do you actually think that's funny? What's with all the name-play? You really do come across like a twelve year-old blathering on the internet to no one. Pretty sad.
I also love how if I'm also not punning on the president's last name in a childish way I'm automatically a "Leftist" (not sure why it's capitalized). What a world you must live in. Ick.
@sleepapnea Your verbosity is exceeded only by your total stupidity!
"The Democrat Party profits off of the misery and suffering of the American people. That's what is outrageous -- that we have a political party in this country which benefits from their own self-imposed suffering."RL
Harry Reid: “I am vigorous in going forward with congressionally directed spending. I fight for it.”
Good idea heading into a tight election, Harry — tell everybody how much you not only love spending their money like crazy, but how you’re constitutionally bound to do nothing less. That’ll turn things around!
Whether they are defending Iran or bleating for Hugo Chavez, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant.ac
@TylerNull You are clearly a fucking idiot and should avoid doing irresponsible things like voting and voicing your stupid opinion. What exactly makes fact based education "leftist proselytism?" Put up or shut up you cretin.
@TylerNull That doesn't make any sense and inorder for me to answer your question, you must first answer mine. Obviously you can't because you're an idiot christian zealot who allows an ancient mythological text to do your thinking for you- well that and Fox news. Anyway if you answer my question then I will gladdly answer yours- though it would probably be a waste of time.
EITHER claim a question "doesn't make any sense", OR imply you will answer it.
You see, genius, claiming both, as you did, further exposes the idiotic core powering your Church of Liberalism and its transparent pretense of reasoning. (In other words, you're projecting.)
Oh, and venting your irrelevant rage at a lone TV news network wouldn't help your argument even if you ever get around to posting one.
@TylerNull Foolish, ridiculous idiot- i asked you to answer the question that I posed because I would require your answer (essentially defining "Leftist proselytism") before I would be able to answer your dumb question. If you think that my reasoning is a pretense, then answer the fucking question so i can prove you right or disporve your blather altogether.
Did my comment really come across to you as "rage?" I said you got information from Fox- is that rage? Nevermind, first question first.
@TylerNull I am not at all surprised that infantile word games are all that you have. By all means, continue and prove what an imbecile that you are. I will ask again: What exactly makes fact based education "leftist proselytism?"
If you are able to define "leftist proselytism" then I may be able to answer your brainless response question. You have the floor fool.
@TylerNull I fgured out why I do this. It is literally just to watch an idiot scramble to find the right defense. It's a combination of sadness and morbid curiousity- like seeing how long a orphaned chick lasts on the discovery channel. Essentially you have decided that saying nothing of substance is your best offense/defense.
I have no time for people of your greatly reduced calibur. You may fuck off now. Bye, have a nice delusion.
Evidently, devout Atheists do have time -- gobs of it -- yet only to avoid whatever point so infuriates them; only to scurry from topic to topic to topic, always avoiding the last of their exposed dogma, mythologies, censorship and bigotry.
Exposing the depraved core of Atheist-socialist proselytism required no "defense". It was fun though, with you providing all my evidence for me. Thanks.
@TylerNull If you would be specific as I am more than willing to do about your silly myths, we may be able to have a conversation. Since you just wish to posture and use the best arguments against your dogma, for your dogma, I can se no reason to spare with you. It is like shooting against someone who insists that they need no gun and that they hit a target without firing. Pointless.
@TylerNull Oh yes, and I am so glad that you have granted me, and apparently dozens of others hours of your "limited time" to debate even if you insist on using nonesense to backup your claims. You should however try using some substance to your rants, it would make you seem more intelligent even though that is clearly untrue.
You socialist mystics keep avoiding the point by asking people to define English words for you. Obviously, you reject the English definitions of words, so what do you guys use for your definitions?
Now, stop proselytizing your political theology, and answer the question.
By "fiction-based", the Atheist socialist is referring to Texans who want children to be taught mathematics and history instead of fellatio and fisting lessons.
Atheist socialism -- a constant panic that reality is seeping in and ruining their political theology.
@TylerNull As usual your argument is baseless and idiotic. Care to give an example of fellatio and fisting lessons insisted upon by "socialists?" I didn't think so. I hope all of this attention makes you feel as loved as your god is supposed to.
@TylerNull You refuse to answer any questions yourself, probably due to your complete lack of ability to think- thus answer anything. For instance you never answered my rather simple question instead deciding upon spouting a litany of ignorant untruths without substance- the true mark of a pathetic internet troll.
By my count I have asked you four questions, and you have answered exactly zero of them. Where did you get your "dozens" figure? (5) I suppose god told you.
@TheOmegadusk the smarty pants leftist elitists who have driven America into the ditch by discarding traditional American values and principles should be cautious in writing off the most effective national advocate for such values precisely at the time that leftist programs have so conspicuously failed and outraged the public.
You come from the idea that being the smartest is not a good thing and that we should have the smartest people possible making decisions of national importance.
"I can see November from my house."
You come from a team that exalts idiocy and wants everyone to be as stupid as you are so you needn't be self conscious about it anymore.
@TheOmegadusk November 10, 2004 - The Montgomery County, Maryland public school system adopted a pro-gay sex education curriculum on November 9. "The committee approved a student video demonstrating condom use that encourages fruit flavored condoms for oral sex"
The materials will teach 10th graders how to put condoms on cucumbers, use flavored condoms for oral sex, and 8th graders will be taught that homosexual couples are the newest American family.
@FrankCastlez Do you really think that NARTH is a good place to learn about homosexuality? They think that homosexuality is "curable," it isn't no more than heterosexuality is. Given the above, your view on this doesn't surprise me.
Tell me, is there anything since about that area having fewer teen pregnancies? Perhaps fewer instances of violent intolerance towards gays? I bet they don't mention that at NARTH. Who could imagine why? I doubt that you could. :)
Also, up until now you have failed to make such an assertion and you clearly do not know what the word "shill" means. Liberals have not had nearly as much time as neo-cons have had to destroy this nation. Finally, I am not a liberal but you are clearly an idiot Glenn Beck worshiper.
@FrankCastlez Add learning to use a question mark to your "need to do" list.
You flat out fail at everything- from substance to intellectualism to understanding reality itself. I'm not going to bother asking you to clarify anymore because you either cannot or refuse to. Not that it matters considering your unintelligible blather anyway.
Pathetic "rightist." (Deeerrrrr goood one Francis!!!!)
We most certainly need fact-based education - but, even more fundamentally, we need to teach deductive reasoning and the scientific method. Teaching kids HOW to think and how to evaluate statements of fact and teaching them to be skeptical of rote learning and received 'truths' that are not accompanied by observable evidence is the single most powerful way to undermine religious brainwashing.
By "religious brainwashing", the Atheist apologist is speaking of that which the Christian monk, Gregor Mendel, suffered from during his scientific discoveries which fathered the genetic sciences.
By "religious brainwashing", the Atheist apologist is speaking of that which the Roman Catholic priest, Monsignor Lemaître, suffered from when he fathered modern astrophysics with what Atheists then derisively termed "The Big Bang Theory".
Atheist idiocies stick. Evidently, by constant proselytism.
@TylerNull You can't deny that the vast majority of scientific progress has been led by atheists. Almost no members of the National Academy of Sciences believe in a personal God. Those few religious scientists have had to set aside their dogma in order to think rationally. Only by denying that God creates each organism from scratch could Mendel consider the possibility of genetic inheritance. Only by accepting that planets are moved by physical laws, not angels, could Lemaître be a scientist.
Boasting of your bigots and their cloistered, politically monotonic organizations, which were dumb enough, evidently, to boast of their 100% blacklisting, wasn't much of a rebuttal to my historical facts that expose your Atheist dogma for what it is.
Oh, the same goes for your caricatures of your misunderstandings of your misrepresentations of others whose dogma is so obviously less demonstrably false than yours.
So, set aside your exposed Atheist dogma, and try again.
@TylerNull Fortunately scientific truth is derived rationally by an educated scientific elite - and not through a referendum of the ignorant masses. You are excluded from the process due to your lack of education. If scientific truth was defined by Texan rednecks rather than the best brains in the nation we'd still be dying of smallpox thinking that it was a punishment for sin and we'd still be relying on prayers rather than weather forecasts to protect us from tornadoes.
Bitterly clinging to your exposed Atheist dogma whilst boasting of Atheists' political monolith, posed as science, even after you just helped me OUT it all, isn't much of a rebuttal.
@TylerNull Your comment is totally incoherent; you're an evolution denier. Evolution is the reason that science is taking over from religion. Science works; religion doesn't. Evolution selects things which work. The scientific elite are an elite because their ideas work. All that will happen if Texas schools reject science & reason is that the State will be left behind, fewer Texans will get professional jobs and it will become a Third World state full of rednecks, trailer trash & superstition.
If it weren't for fake science, teachers' labor unions would have no "science" with which to proselytize their political theology.
Your E-word is just that. It holds no magical powers, contrary to illiterates like you. You are a devotee of socialist mystics who proselytize a wad of debunked idiocies under your holy E-word, posing it all as science, as socialist hoaxers typically do.
Texans got fed up with Dem'rat party agitprop, and decided to CHANGE that. Get over it.
@TylerNull When the US military has kicked the ass of the religious wackos in Afghanistan they should get on with dealing with the religious wackos running Texas.
Behold the depraved equivocations powering the political Leftist.
Desperately seeking sanctuary for their Muslim comrades, Western Leftists only mention the M-word as a lead in to attack their common enemy -- Christianity.
Leftists & Muslims -- Life Partners -- Hot for Hirabah
My grandfather was dragged behind a pickup driven by three black men because he was white. They were never charged with anything because they were black and the local judges wanted to be reelected. You wonder why Texas is like it is? Assholes like you who only see one side of the issue and not look at the whole.
There is nothing secular about Darwinist proselytism.
There is nothing scientific about the full wad of defunct Darwinist notions proselytized as Holy Writ by the teachers labor unions.
Texas simply got tired of fringe Leftists failing to teach, for example, American history, replacing it with promiscuity-only lessons, so Texans are doing something about it.
@TylerNull -so not only are your political views batshit crazy but your religious views are too. That figures you would believe in that horseshit and champion historical revisionism, religious intolerance, and statist interventionist propaganda.Fundamentalist screwheads like you are no better than the Jihadists.
@TylerNull What is pot-powered about scientific fact based education? Now if you equate 'bongs and pot' with fantasy, perhaps fantasy based education like religion is more akin to 'pot' fancies.
What is "scientific fact based" about the Church of Liberalism and its Leftist political theology proselytized to everyone's school kids for 12+ years through the largest, richest labor price-fixing cartel in human history?
And if you Lib's -- whichever L-word you hide behind -- don't like being associated with bongs, then perhaps you shouldn't maintain the legalization of pot as a central theme.
Either way, don't smear your stink onto those who notice. It's so L-word-y.
@TylerNull If being liberal = fact based education rather than pie in the sky fantasy theology then I guess that makes me liberal. You use the word liberal like it's a dirty word, perhaps to a 12 year old that may mean something or even hurt, but methinks you ought to grow up and grow out of your silly name calling and 'word-y' ie sesquipedalian sillyness. Tis all rather juvenile.
Liberalism is the biggest "pie in the sky fantasy".
Liberals believe we can tax our way to prosperity, and spend our way out of debt. Liberals believe political hustlers are deities. Liberals believe gov't functionaries can control the weather. Liberals believe torturing babies to death is a divine right codified by the US Constitution. Liberals believe the solution to labor price-fixing cartels is to pay them more.
If liberals were "fact based", then they would OUT Liberalism.
@TylerNull Liberals believe TylerNull is a dull twit in need of further medication and or investigation into missing children. If you are a crazy arsed christian representing your loser religion then YOUR religion should pay TAXES!
Oh and don't forget teaching in history classes that the civil war was only about slavery. Northern states teach that. Southern states teach it was about states rights. The real reason that most of the South fought was they saw an invading army and protected their homeland.
@TylerNull -ha ha ha ha - sheesh! Where do you come up with this pseudo-intellectual pseudo-science bullshit - Texas textbooks??? let's discuss the easter bunny, santa, and the tooth fairy while were at it.
@TylerNull Evolution is not taught as "holy writ". You don't understand the difference between religion and science. Religion is based upon unsubstantiated belief - which is why everyone can (and does) have their own beliefs. Science - such as evolution- is based upon direct observation of facts. It is not a dogma - it is a rational conclusion derived through use of the scientific method.
You religious evolutionary crocks are claiming that by empirical observations of fossil you can call your religion scientifically proven. Where is the empirical observation of one species coming out of another species, as an fully develloped brand new species ? do you have any scientifically observed cases in our known history for the last 6000 years ?. Do you ? no you don't. and you are braggin about your religious claims as proves of your extremly high IQ.....kiss my ass.
You so-called religious crocks have hijacked the word evolution as an totally explanations of how life have come about. There have been big evolution in the machinery, but the word have nothing to do with how it has happenning. Like a machine in the machinery "evolution" it stands out fully functional, it dies, and a new species of machinery are there. I just wonder how the hell is that possible, in life.
@johnsenkenn Why don't you learn how evolution works before churning out halfassed ideas about how it doesn't? The thoughly proven Theory of Evolution is not about how life first came about, it is about how life developed it's diversity. If you feel that you can disprove what all of the top scientists in the world have proven- do it! Get you a Nobel Prize and rub it in Richard Dawkin's face. If nothing else, learn something for a change.
Why don't you learn what the word evolution means, and why don't you try to think for a change, instead of let others ( the state ) think for you. Try to think for a change even if you are not born with the capacity. Do those things or shut the fuck up, even when it's impossible for you.
@johnsenkenn I know what evolution means but I am quite certain that you do not. Have you even looked up the definition in a current dictionary? I know, it must be hard to understand that there are multiple meanings for many of our English words.
Again, I invite you to disprove any one thing that scientists have proven concerning evolution. Doing so would make you insanely rich- what are you waiting for?
You evolutionists are deceptive, you use the word evolution in a deceptive way. It's reasonably proven there have been changes in life, species have gone and new have come. But how that have happen, is a theory. The Sumerians explanations is just as good as yours. As a matter of fact, it's much more logic.
@johnsenkenn wrong...evolution is more than a guess...speciation phylogeny classification...are all very sound...a scientific theory is the highest competence science can reach..its a high as a law...it explains law...yet it never becomes a law..but its as high....gravity is a theory...the bible simply is a tall tale...we just have to admit that..or at least that the evidence leads us towards evolution as the best answer
Speciation phylogeny classification.....is that your explanation of change in lifeforms. Your claims is a law, my ass. Leave the Bible out of it, I am not talking about the Bible.
A theory is not a fact, gravity is reasonably a fact, but how it came about is a theory, evolution is reasonably a fact.....but how it happenned is a theory.
@johnsenkenn what?...it is right now a theory...theories explain LAWS...theory is the highest achievment of a given field of study..you are very very wrong and lost
Well we are apes, ask an genetic, something have happenned to our chromosome, a couple are weled, and that cannot happen by chance, don't remember it exactly.
@johnsenkenn anything can happen by chance in an eternity any one event will happen...thats an opinion on your part...you cant understand the odds...so you say it cant happen...which is false logic..you offer exactly no proof for a statement like that
Your socalled science about development of species is rubbish, just as the so-called science about global warming is rubbish. And just as your global warming it's an religien invented with a purpose.
Well call it what you want, ape or man, according to you we the apes are all developed from the same species. According to you all living is developed from one another, to me it's just strange that it does not happen around me, there are no new species coming around. There are born millions of pigs every day, but no new species, when there is a change in anything born.....it's always negative, never positive.
I think the only thing that will save this nation is for someone to destroy it.
Take over, have a heavy hand. Create martial law, destroy all churches and kill most that are fundamentalists...have that going on for around 40 years and then go back to freedom, real freedom free of ignorant assholes that do shit like changing what is taught to fit their personal beliefs.
yeah, kill everyone that doesnt agree with my idea of not forcing beliefs on others
@rdrakken Well, thats what the Bible God teached with the flood, he killed almost all the people and animals, just to start again with a selected few.
the overwhelming evidence for evolution..... opinion based on what???? not evidence since you cant have evidence for something that has no evidence. Or for something proven false and no way to scientifically recreate it. don't say it science when its just your belief, because religions believe in science and science only, not your religion aka belief.
Slickwick: You speak of evidence, not proof. There is no proof, only evidence to support the theory.
Roner, some who drink the kool-aid see evolution everywhere. You BELIEVE that the ancestors of dogs are wolves. Your faith is strong. Sadly, your command of the english language is not (the plural of wolf is not wolfs....)
@Clammypollack I already studied some english, french, german...but noone of those is mi native languaje.
"A cat is a cat" doesnt say anything, we know a cat is cat, and we also know they are relatives to lions,panthers, lynx, etc. whats your explanation of that?
E v o l u t i o n
E V O L U T I O N
E V O L U T I O N
i spell that slowly so you can understand mi grammar. .-)
Thanks for shared, Very Informative this vids
Flusercom 2 weeks ago
Good Video.. I like this Vids
Spasatcom 2 weeks ago
0:52 i live in texas...
SkullDMunch 1 month ago
Please forgive my various spelling errors...that would be Big BANG (as in Evolution), not Big BANK (the illustrious Federal Reserve)
delendt57 4 months ago
The big bank theory has much to do with "matter being created or destroyed" ...as in ...where did all that stuff/gas/debris come from that exploded int he big bang? And, admittedly I am not a scientist, nor a science major. I am an intelligent person with a a critical and skeptical mind who does not like to be lied to. I don't like other people being lied to either, because ideas have consequences, and the consequences of believing in Evolution are hatred, racism and violence.
delendt57 4 months ago
Regarding Australopiticus: Dr. Charles F. Oxnard is a professor in the Departments of Anatomy and Anthropology, According to Dr. Oxnard, his analyses show that Australopithecus was not intermediate between Man and the apes but was uniquely different. He did a computer analysis of the bones found by not only Leakey but also his son, which showed that the creature did not walk upright, and was not a human ancestor.
delendt57 4 months ago
Have you ever taken logic? There are plenty of viable reasons why many scientists believe the BBT: 1. The professors at most universities and colleges have been taught/trained at secular humanist government universities where they were taught that the BBT and Evolution was a fact; 2. Professors who don't go along with the BBT and E tend not to get hired or tenured;
delendt57 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You should also watch this:
watch?v=vss1VKN2rf8
SeanACampbell 4 months ago
Please also see my video 'Its up to us' humanism will find Peter Blake from Cornwall explaining how he came to reject religion and embrace humanism.
maryfletcher4 5 months ago
"TEXAS SCIENCE" ??? HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA... What the hell is that? shit, I love it when I come across involuntary humor :)
nestorlovesguitar 6 months ago
Wow, your vocabulary! Why don't you take Allah's or Muhammed's or some other supposed diety's name in vain? Why is it always JESUS CHRIST?? I'm not casting anymore pearls.... If you're Biblically literate enough to finish the sentence. You failed to give me any example of transitional forms. You are dreadfully ignorant of the differences between mictro and macro evolution. You ad hominid attacks and other lgoical fallacies...Wow.
slmbluebird 7 months ago
Locke, you failed to address anything I wrote in my comment. Please supply ONE transitional form. Give me one example of empirical (or otherwise) proof of macroevolution. As for the ad hominum attack, I did very well in school, being on the Honors list and having a 3.782 gpa. What are these "erroneous connections" I'm trying to make? I suggest you be as skeptical of evolution as you are of everyone who opposes it.
slmbluebird 7 months ago
@slmbluebird
Transitional Forms: Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus, Ardipithecus, Pierolapithecus, Proconsul.
On the point of "empirical evidence" that is simply unrealistic considering the timescales we are dealing with. Empirical evidence is a way of gaining knowledge by means of direct observation or experience. It cannot be observed directly, obviously. I suggest you google "29+ Evidences for Macroevolution"
SeanACampbell 4 months ago
@slmbluebird The reason people are criticizing your understanding of science is because you are showing a lack of understanding of basic scientific principals. The second law of thermodynamics which you are using is not violated by evolution. See: fsteiger dot com/thermo2
What possible relevant does matter being neither created nor destroyed have with this conversation at all?
SeanACampbell 4 months ago
@slmbluebird I would also like you to explain why a massive majority of scientists support the big bang model, abiogenesis and evolution by natural selection if it violates scientific principals. These are the people most educated in these principals. Please, read any science textbook before trying to make arguments. Don't tell me you have, because your arguments show that you haven't or that if you have, you haven't understood. Alternatively, you are being intentionally dishonest.
SeanACampbell 4 months ago
Micro evolution may be an established fact, but Macro Evolution is not. There are no transitional forms. Evolution violates the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum, violates the Laws of Thermodynamics (everything is tending towards disorder; and matter is neither created nor destroyed). You are right that our tax dollars should not be used to fund deceitful curriculum in the schools. That's why the illogical theory (THEORY, not FACT) of Evolution should not be taught.
slmbluebird 9 months ago
@slmbluebird It's apparent you didn't pay much attention in school, but that is not an excuse. You can simply use Google to discover what evolution is, what the Theory of Evolution is, and the Laws of Science that you mention. You don't need to be a scientist to see the erroneous connections to try to make. The knowledge gained by just reading the summation of these things is enough to debunk whatever your preacher has been telling you.
Locke99GS 8 months ago
@slmbluebird Micro evolution and macro evolution are the same thing. The only difference is that macro evolution works over a longer period of time.
Your other two points are only correct in a closed system. The earth is not a closed system. The sun is constantly pouring energy onto the earth.
Please feel free to raise any factual objections, you may have to evolution, and if it within my abilities I will answer them.
Hyperplaterine 7 months ago
@slmbluebird I would encourage you to explain exactly how the theory of evolution by natural selection violates the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum. There is no difference between the mechanics of micro-evolution and macro-evolution. Evolution is simply that mutation (by insertion, deletion or substitution) causes change to genetic code. Natural selection results in lifeforms with beneficial mutations passing on genes while those with harmful mutations not passing on their genes.
SeanACampbell 4 months ago
Well, good thing I don't live in the USA
SonarWavePulse 9 months ago 2
WTF is Texas Science?
jmlew 10 months ago
@jmlew In Texas, it's "science". Everywhere else it's known as "creationism."
Locke99GS 8 months ago
The goddamn board of education makes the rest of us Texans look crazy. How the fuck did these idiots even get elected? Jesus christ, I am so fucking mad right now.
QuickdrawMcShaw 10 months ago
I live in Texas, this makes me want to run far, far away. Or perhaps just never have children.
maarakailet1 1 year ago 5
We are build a generation of Ignorance
kleb100 1 year ago
@kleb100 Yes, all the generations above us were building generations of ignorance, but there was still progress. It is up to us to regulate progress in this generation.
nowayout001 1 year ago
The worst idiots are in charge for the rest of us,like“state board of education” set the bases for people to follow their footsteps in the field of irrationality,”.If I say that 2+2 makes 4 and I bring you converging EVIDENCE about it,you simply say “no” and have NO EVIDENCE to back up your claims and show me where I’m wrong,you must have some kind of mental defect.Doesn’t matter if you are a biologist, a politician,A TEACHER(!).If you reject all sorts of CONVERGING EVIDENCE,you got problems
gennarog 1 year ago
Fucking hell, I thought that FrankCastlez guy would never shut the fuck up. That dude is living proof that our education system is in desperate need of reworking.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago 2
Wow... I had no idea America was THIS messed up.
miki5xD 1 year ago
Wow... I had no idea America was THIS messed up. xD
miki5xD 1 year ago
I never understood this. I went to a publicly funded catholic school from jk to grade 12. We never once debated the fact the universe is billions of years old, my school taught the sciences so well non-catholic students attended for the better academic standard, in fact my priest has even mentioned how ridiculous not believing evolution is. I don't understand the "bible belt" at all.
Hashime777222 1 year ago 22
@Hashime777222 Same with me in my Catholic HS. However, Conservative Christians are very different than Catholics. In fact, most Christians I've encountered have very low opinions on Catholics. They call them pagans due to their Saints...as well as many other titles. Conservative Christians aren't led by a pope, they are led by their ministers in their churches...and they follow quite blindly unfortunately.
danigurrl26 11 months ago
@Hashime777222 Over the centuries the catholic church has been in retreat. They argued against any new scientific advances and then grudgingly bowed to the evidence. This aproach is still better than the "bible belt". Their response to overwhelming evidence is to put their fingers in their ears and shout LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU.
Hyperplaterine 7 months ago
@Hashime777222 Catholics are generally better since the pope even believes in evolution but rednecks (CHRISTIANS*COUGH)are rednecks
jandkas 3 months ago
Texas Book depository, of course, is where Oswald was when he shot Kennedy.
A perfect metaphor for the South --- and they have been shooting the truth for 80 years, as long as public education has been around to any degree.
The Texas strangle hold on the text books is why most people have no idea how vile the South was, how men like Lee and Davis tortured slave girls -- and regularly sold children, even infants.
Taxfools 1 year ago 4
AP}Obama: ObamaCare provides “structure” for further gov’t growth.
Just like Social Security!
another unfucking believable moment in Odumber's life.
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
AP}Giannoulias admits to dirty trick with third-party campaign in IL.
There you go...You got it. Demrats are so bankrupt on the issues, they resort to vote fraud and dirty tricks.
this is what to expect from the likes of TheOmegadumbasses of the world.
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
AP}David Brooks: These Democrats are pathetically smug and self-deluding, aren’t they?
It looks like David Brooks going to stop the water carrying for you morons.
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
AP}Boxer failed to declare million-dollar house on disclosures?
She chairs the Senate Ethics Committee, so Barbara Boxer should know her obligations for disclosure as a member of the upper chamber!!
Holder can look into the matter because she is white, right?
“I think I’ve earned the title of Unethical Senator”
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
"Obama running around and telling everybody that the Republicans want to undo his reforms is a positive message for the Republicans. I mean, undoing Obama's reforms is what everybody wants!" RL
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
AP}Obama’s turnout pitch to Latinos: Get out there and punish your “enemies”
This is Omegadumbass's Messiah! he sounds alternately fearful, angry, scared. Not exactly qualities of leadership most people look for in a president, but when you’re bitterly clinging to your agendas…
pathetic leftist asses
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
Barrack Obama: I dabbled into Communism. Barrack Obama: I did Cocaine Barrack Obama: I began my political career in a domestic Terrorists (William Ayers) house. Barrack Obama: I attended a Black Nationalist, Racist, church for twenty years. Barrack Obama: My father was a Communist. Barrack Obama: My mother was a Communist. Barrack Obama: I’ve appointed Communists to responsible government posts. Barrack Obama: My mentor (Frank Marshall Davis) as a teen was a Communist
Obama, a fucking marxist ?
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
@FrankCastlez I really like how you make up your own quotes and take up a large portion of your 500 characters repeating the president's name between each one. Very nice- it has all of the cadence of a religious ceremony or a propaganda piece. It's too bad that you are personally too stupid to get into that line of work full time- I am sure one of your republicunts... excuse me... tea baggers would snatch you right up.
Do you fear/hate all black people this much or just the ones in charge? :D
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
Omegadunce and his Messiah BHussien, have failed miserably in implication of their "hope and change" only to outrage the public with their hubrus.
leftists are the south end of a northbound horse
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
@FrankCastlez Hey buttplug, you can talk to me instead of about me thanks very much. I notice that you decided to use the old scary middle name trick- nice one jackass! Especially coming from someone who is using the name of a psychotic vigilante that murders with passion and wears a skull on his chest.
I am actually really enjoying embarrassing and exposing you as an idiotic cowardly charlatan. Keep the material coming, you're like Glenn Beck only more pathetic.
And it's hubris btw.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadumbass has nothing but epithets and leftist blathering!
yawn..
Obama lies:
"we will launch a sweepig effort to root out waste, inefficiency, and unnecessary spending by the govt. and every american can see where our money is being spent!!"
Gawd this has to be one of the biggest bullshit lines this leftist ass has ever said!!
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
@FrankCastlez Just following your lead. Way to listen to Rush and almost word for word write his schtick here. Who's pathetic?
Oh and you say you believe in a reduced government, but you are willing to have government make decisions in all American bedrooms, hospital rooms, science labs- that they have no right or qualification to make.
Ahh you like the word blather? Your welcome, maybe you can learn more words from me. Keep it coming silly McCarthyist. You make my point better than me.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegathedumbass there you go again making assertions, imply that I made them and then mock it.
are you really this obtuse, pathetic.
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
@FrankCastlez Project much? LOL!!! Again just following your lead.
Again, who's pathetic?
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegathedumbass you really are obtuse!
"the cadence of a religious ceremony "
there is nothing more hilarious then leftist atheists using christianity in order to prop up their leftist atheist ideology!
really pathetic.
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
@FrankCastlez I can only assume that you are not speaking of my angle. I find it amusing that one such as you would find the courage to call me obtuse and pathetic, all the while proving that you are brainwashed by the dumbest people in the media and blowing impossibly huge amounts of hot air onto one small comment section of youtube.
You must occasionally forget to breathe!
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadumbass "you would find the courage "
Find the courage to call out a dumbass like you! Bwhahaha hhahahaha!
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
@FrankCastlez Ah yes, rambling like an idiot online requires no courage. You are a testament to that.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadumbass Fails again and again.
pathetically smug and self deluding......
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
@FrankCastlez Aww you sound as though your spirit is broken. I thought your kind was immune to evidence but you almost seem to realizing that everyone is discounting you as a loon. Come on now Francis, buck up! You aren't done spouting your ultra-neo-con bullshit are you? I was sure that you'd have a lot more for us!
I mean of course you failed, even at appearing smug, but that's no reason to quit. Then again, being wrong is a reason to, so maybe you should. I'm no good at pep talks am I... ;)
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadumbass "Aww you sound "
Still making assertions and imply its mine then mock it. Its all you again and again as they say.
you're an effen moronic leftist troll..;)
unbelievably pathetic.
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
@FrankCastlez You keep using that "making assertions" argument but I think that you just like using the word assertions because you seem to think that it makes you seem more intelligent, which it really doesn't. And as I have said several times here- just following your lead fascist. You are easy to mock and that is your fault.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadumbass is so bankrupt on any of the Odumber issues he\she resorts to making the subject about me!
gawd, your extremely pathetic.
yawn.
FrankCastlez 1 year ago 10
@FrankCastlez Yes I can see that this bores you...
And it's "You're pathetic" silly.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago 2
@FrankCastlez It's amazing how nearly every person on Youtube who criticizes President Obama thinks it ingeniously clever to make a play on his name like "Odumber." Is it just that you don't think your criticism can stand on its own or are you actually twelve years-old? I notice your YouTube channel page also features a graphic of Obama with the words "100% Douchebag." Do you realize how unserious and juvenile this makes you look?
sleepcity 1 year ago
@sleepapnea If the politics of you Leftists weren't so obviously indefensible, then you wouldn't have to publicly debase yourselves so often trying to hide from them.
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
@FrankCastlez Once again... My username is "sleepcity" so you think it infinitely witty to refer to me as "sleepapnea"? Do you actually think that's funny? What's with all the name-play? You really do come across like a twelve year-old blathering on the internet to no one. Pretty sad.
I also love how if I'm also not punning on the president's last name in a childish way I'm automatically a "Leftist" (not sure why it's capitalized). What a world you must live in. Ick.
sleepcity 1 year ago
@sleepapnea Your verbosity is exceeded only by your total stupidity!
"The Democrat Party profits off of the misery and suffering of the American people. That's what is outrageous -- that we have a political party in this country which benefits from their own self-imposed suffering."RL
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
@FrankCastlez So...your response to my comment is to call me stupid? Now I'm certain you're twelve years-old. Thanks for the "conversation."
sleepcity 1 year ago 2
@sleepapnea Sit down, give your mind a rest - it obviously needs it.
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
Harry Reid: “I am vigorous in going forward with congressionally directed spending. I fight for it.”
Good idea heading into a tight election, Harry — tell everybody how much you not only love spending their money like crazy, but how you’re constitutionally bound to do nothing less. That’ll turn things around!
omega's pathetic leftist crowd.
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
Whether they are defending Iran or bleating for Hugo Chavez, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant.ac
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
By "fact based education", the labor union shill means "unencumbered Leftist proselytism", of course.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull You are clearly a fucking idiot and should avoid doing irresponsible things like voting and voicing your stupid opinion. What exactly makes fact based education "leftist proselytism?" Put up or shut up you cretin.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadusk
What exactly makes Leftist proselytism "fact based education"?
Put up or shut up, you jackass.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull That doesn't make any sense and inorder for me to answer your question, you must first answer mine. Obviously you can't because you're an idiot christian zealot who allows an ancient mythological text to do your thinking for you- well that and Fox news. Anyway if you answer my question then I will gladdly answer yours- though it would probably be a waste of time.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadusk
HINT to a CLUE:
EITHER claim a question "doesn't make any sense", OR imply you will answer it.
You see, genius, claiming both, as you did, further exposes the idiotic core powering your Church of Liberalism and its transparent pretense of reasoning. (In other words, you're projecting.)
Oh, and venting your irrelevant rage at a lone TV news network wouldn't help your argument even if you ever get around to posting one.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull Foolish, ridiculous idiot- i asked you to answer the question that I posed because I would require your answer (essentially defining "Leftist proselytism") before I would be able to answer your dumb question. If you think that my reasoning is a pretense, then answer the fucking question so i can prove you right or disporve your blather altogether.
Did my comment really come across to you as "rage?" I said you got information from Fox- is that rage? Nevermind, first question first.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadusk
Behold the Brain Trust.
I (too) asked you to answer the question that I posed because I would require your answer ...
(Take a minute, genius.)
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull I am not at all surprised that infantile word games are all that you have. By all means, continue and prove what an imbecile that you are. I will ask again: What exactly makes fact based education "leftist proselytism?"
If you are able to define "leftist proselytism" then I may be able to answer your brainless response question. You have the floor fool.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadusk
I prefer the English definitions of words rather than make up my own.
You Leftist fundies should try that sometime.
Regardless, it's clear that your only defense from my political observation is to hope the reader buys into your claimed illiteracy.
CHANGE.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull I fgured out why I do this. It is literally just to watch an idiot scramble to find the right defense. It's a combination of sadness and morbid curiousity- like seeing how long a orphaned chick lasts on the discovery channel. Essentially you have decided that saying nothing of substance is your best offense/defense.
I have no time for people of your greatly reduced calibur. You may fuck off now. Bye, have a nice delusion.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadusk
Evidently, devout Atheists do have time -- gobs of it -- yet only to avoid whatever point so infuriates them; only to scurry from topic to topic to topic, always avoiding the last of their exposed dogma, mythologies, censorship and bigotry.
Exposing the depraved core of Atheist-socialist proselytism required no "defense". It was fun though, with you providing all my evidence for me. Thanks.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull If you would be specific as I am more than willing to do about your silly myths, we may be able to have a conversation. Since you just wish to posture and use the best arguments against your dogma, for your dogma, I can se no reason to spare with you. It is like shooting against someone who insists that they need no gun and that they hit a target without firing. Pointless.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TylerNull Oh yes, and I am so glad that you have granted me, and apparently dozens of others hours of your "limited time" to debate even if you insist on using nonesense to backup your claims. You should however try using some substance to your rants, it would make you seem more intelligent even though that is clearly untrue.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TylerNull You wouldn't know an objective scientific fact if it hit you in the eye.
EqualAndFree 1 year ago
@EqualAndFree
You didn't answer the question.
You socialist mystics keep avoiding the point by asking people to define English words for you. Obviously, you reject the English definitions of words, so what do you guys use for your definitions?
Now, stop proselytizing your political theology, and answer the question.
TylerNull 1 year ago
President Bush condemned the "reality-based community". Do you wish to join him in celebrating the "fantasy-based community"?
EqualAndFree 1 year ago
@EqualAndFree
Again, you failed to answer the question.
Yet, you shamelessly spew more of your political mythology AND pose it as a question.
Atheist mysticism -- the world's most unexamined & toxic political theology.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull haha - I knew some moron would stand up to defend fiction-based education (aka Christian propaganda and lies).
EqualAndFree 1 year ago
@EqualAndFree
By "fiction-based", the Atheist socialist is referring to Texans who want children to be taught mathematics and history instead of fellatio and fisting lessons.
Atheist socialism -- a constant panic that reality is seeping in and ruining their political theology.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull As usual your argument is baseless and idiotic. Care to give an example of fellatio and fisting lessons insisted upon by "socialists?" I didn't think so. I hope all of this attention makes you feel as loved as your god is supposed to.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadusk
Care to answer my question before you ask your dozens? I didn't think so.
Now stop posing as if your Atheist-socialist devotions would ever allow for reality to seep into them.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull You refuse to answer any questions yourself, probably due to your complete lack of ability to think- thus answer anything. For instance you never answered my rather simple question instead deciding upon spouting a litany of ignorant untruths without substance- the true mark of a pathetic internet troll.
By my count I have asked you four questions, and you have answered exactly zero of them. Where did you get your "dozens" figure? (5) I suppose god told you.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadusk
You demonstrate one of the "perks" of being a baseless Atheist -- shamelessness.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull I suppose that makes your perk brainlessness?
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadusk the smarty pants leftist elitists who have driven America into the ditch by discarding traditional American values and principles should be cautious in writing off the most effective national advocate for such values precisely at the time that leftist programs have so conspicuously failed and outraged the public.
I can see November from my house.
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
@FrankCastlez "...the smarty pants leftist elitists..."
"I can see November from my house."
You come from the idea that being the smartest is not a good thing and that we should have the smartest people possible making decisions of national importance.
"I can see November from my house."
You come from a team that exalts idiocy and wants everyone to be as stupid as you are so you needn't be self conscious about it anymore.
Now that you are profiled...
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadusk "that being the smartest is not a good thing"
Omega doth protest too much!
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
@TheOmegadusk November 10, 2004 - The Montgomery County, Maryland public school system adopted a pro-gay sex education curriculum on November 9. "The committee approved a student video demonstrating condom use that encourages fruit flavored condoms for oral sex"
The materials will teach 10th graders how to put condoms on cucumbers, use flavored condoms for oral sex, and 8th graders will be taught that homosexual couples are the newest American family.
pathetic
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
@FrankCastlez Do you really think that NARTH is a good place to learn about homosexuality? They think that homosexuality is "curable," it isn't no more than heterosexuality is. Given the above, your view on this doesn't surprise me.
Tell me, is there anything since about that area having fewer teen pregnancies? Perhaps fewer instances of violent intolerance towards gays? I bet they don't mention that at NARTH. Who could imagine why? I doubt that you could. :)
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadusk "your view on this doesn't surprise me."
Making assertions and implicate its mine and then mock it! As they say "its all you!"
You Fail to answer to my assertion that you and your ilk have failed miserably at "hope and yes we can" only to outrage the public by your hubris.
pathetic leftist shill.
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
@FrankCastlez You make it seem so effortless to say nothing of substance. Oh yeah because it's easy, isn't it?
Stupid, ignorant, bigoted, McCarthyist, closet homosexual, moron.
Yeah that was easy!
Also, up until now you have failed to make such an assertion and you clearly do not know what the word "shill" means. Liberals have not had nearly as much time as neo-cons have had to destroy this nation. Finally, I am not a liberal but you are clearly an idiot Glenn Beck worshiper.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadusk "you are clearly "
project much!
you even say I have made an assertion and yet again you FAIL to adress it and just wonder off into leftist drivil.
pathetic leftist
FrankCastlez 1 year ago
@FrankCastlez Add learning to use a question mark to your "need to do" list.
You flat out fail at everything- from substance to intellectualism to understanding reality itself. I'm not going to bother asking you to clarify anymore because you either cannot or refuse to. Not that it matters considering your unintelligible blather anyway.
Pathetic "rightist." (Deeerrrrr goood one Francis!!!!)
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
We most certainly need fact-based education - but, even more fundamentally, we need to teach deductive reasoning and the scientific method. Teaching kids HOW to think and how to evaluate statements of fact and teaching them to be skeptical of rote learning and received 'truths' that are not accompanied by observable evidence is the single most powerful way to undermine religious brainwashing.
EqualAndFree 1 year ago 13
By "religious brainwashing", the Atheist apologist is speaking of that which the Christian monk, Gregor Mendel, suffered from during his scientific discoveries which fathered the genetic sciences.
By "religious brainwashing", the Atheist apologist is speaking of that which the Roman Catholic priest, Monsignor Lemaître, suffered from when he fathered modern astrophysics with what Atheists then derisively termed "The Big Bang Theory".
Atheist idiocies stick. Evidently, by constant proselytism.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull You can't deny that the vast majority of scientific progress has been led by atheists. Almost no members of the National Academy of Sciences believe in a personal God. Those few religious scientists have had to set aside their dogma in order to think rationally. Only by denying that God creates each organism from scratch could Mendel consider the possibility of genetic inheritance. Only by accepting that planets are moved by physical laws, not angels, could Lemaître be a scientist.
EqualAndFree 1 year ago
@EqualAndFree
Boasting of your bigots and their cloistered, politically monotonic organizations, which were dumb enough, evidently, to boast of their 100% blacklisting, wasn't much of a rebuttal to my historical facts that expose your Atheist dogma for what it is.
Oh, the same goes for your caricatures of your misunderstandings of your misrepresentations of others whose dogma is so obviously less demonstrably false than yours.
So, set aside your exposed Atheist dogma, and try again.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull Fortunately scientific truth is derived rationally by an educated scientific elite - and not through a referendum of the ignorant masses. You are excluded from the process due to your lack of education. If scientific truth was defined by Texan rednecks rather than the best brains in the nation we'd still be dying of smallpox thinking that it was a punishment for sin and we'd still be relying on prayers rather than weather forecasts to protect us from tornadoes.
EqualAndFree 1 year ago
@EqualAndFree
Bitterly clinging to your exposed Atheist dogma whilst boasting of Atheists' political monolith, posed as science, even after you just helped me OUT it all, isn't much of a rebuttal.
EVOLVE.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull Your comment is totally incoherent; you're an evolution denier. Evolution is the reason that science is taking over from religion. Science works; religion doesn't. Evolution selects things which work. The scientific elite are an elite because their ideas work. All that will happen if Texas schools reject science & reason is that the State will be left behind, fewer Texans will get professional jobs and it will become a Third World state full of rednecks, trailer trash & superstition.
EqualAndFree 1 year ago
@EqualAndFree
If it weren't for fake science, teachers' labor unions would have no "science" with which to proselytize their political theology.
Your E-word is just that. It holds no magical powers, contrary to illiterates like you. You are a devotee of socialist mystics who proselytize a wad of debunked idiocies under your holy E-word, posing it all as science, as socialist hoaxers typically do.
Texans got fed up with Dem'rat party agitprop, and decided to CHANGE that. Get over it.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull When the US military has kicked the ass of the religious wackos in Afghanistan they should get on with dealing with the religious wackos running Texas.
EqualAndFree 1 year ago
@EqualAndFree
Behold the depraved equivocations powering the political Leftist.
Desperately seeking sanctuary for their Muslim comrades, Western Leftists only mention the M-word as a lead in to attack their common enemy -- Christianity.
Leftists & Muslims -- Life Partners -- Hot for Hirabah
TylerNull 1 year ago
Texas, where you can still get dragged behind a pickup truck for being gay or too dark. Religion is working out real well isn't it?
Ninetyone11 1 year ago
@Ninetyone11
My grandfather was dragged behind a pickup driven by three black men because he was white. They were never charged with anything because they were black and the local judges wanted to be reelected. You wonder why Texas is like it is? Assholes like you who only see one side of the issue and not look at the whole.
lambdaofbacon 1 year ago
There is nothing secular about Darwinist proselytism.
There is nothing scientific about the full wad of defunct Darwinist notions proselytized as Holy Writ by the teachers labor unions.
Texas simply got tired of fringe Leftists failing to teach, for example, American history, replacing it with promiscuity-only lessons, so Texans are doing something about it.
Godspeed.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull -so not only are your political views batshit crazy but your religious views are too. That figures you would believe in that horseshit and champion historical revisionism, religious intolerance, and statist interventionist propaganda.Fundamentalist screwheads like you are no better than the Jihadists.
bnfox 1 year ago
@bnfox
If you ever recover from your hallucinations of "religious views" where there are none mentioned, do attempt to address the topic.
Godspeed.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull -lay off the bong. And fuck yer "godspeed" horseshit.
bnfox 1 year ago
@bnfox
"lay off the bong"
The irony of a "Libertarian" projecting their pot-powered constituency onto others is so obviously missed by their crotch-talkers.
PRICELESS.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull -thanks. You're like a retarded gay Dr Phil.
bnfox 1 year ago
@bnfox
You're welcome.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull What is pot-powered about scientific fact based education? Now if you equate 'bongs and pot' with fantasy, perhaps fantasy based education like religion is more akin to 'pot' fancies.
CosmicMutty 1 year ago
@CosmicMutty
What is "scientific fact based" about the Church of Liberalism and its Leftist political theology proselytized to everyone's school kids for 12+ years through the largest, richest labor price-fixing cartel in human history?
And if you Lib's -- whichever L-word you hide behind -- don't like being associated with bongs, then perhaps you shouldn't maintain the legalization of pot as a central theme.
Either way, don't smear your stink onto those who notice. It's so L-word-y.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull If being liberal = fact based education rather than pie in the sky fantasy theology then I guess that makes me liberal. You use the word liberal like it's a dirty word, perhaps to a 12 year old that may mean something or even hurt, but methinks you ought to grow up and grow out of your silly name calling and 'word-y' ie sesquipedalian sillyness. Tis all rather juvenile.
CosmicMutty 1 year ago
@CosmicMutty
Liberalism is the biggest "pie in the sky fantasy".
Liberals believe we can tax our way to prosperity, and spend our way out of debt. Liberals believe political hustlers are deities. Liberals believe gov't functionaries can control the weather. Liberals believe torturing babies to death is a divine right codified by the US Constitution. Liberals believe the solution to labor price-fixing cartels is to pay them more.
If liberals were "fact based", then they would OUT Liberalism.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull Liberals believe TylerNull is a dull twit in need of further medication and or investigation into missing children. If you are a crazy arsed christian representing your loser religion then YOUR religion should pay TAXES!
CosmicMutty 1 year ago
@TylerNull
Oh and don't forget teaching in history classes that the civil war was only about slavery. Northern states teach that. Southern states teach it was about states rights. The real reason that most of the South fought was they saw an invading army and protected their homeland.
lambdaofbacon 1 year ago
@TylerNull -ha ha ha ha - sheesh! Where do you come up with this pseudo-intellectual pseudo-science bullshit - Texas textbooks??? let's discuss the easter bunny, santa, and the tooth fairy while were at it.
bnfox 1 year ago
@TylerNull Evolution is not taught as "holy writ". You don't understand the difference between religion and science. Religion is based upon unsubstantiated belief - which is why everyone can (and does) have their own beliefs. Science - such as evolution- is based upon direct observation of facts. It is not a dogma - it is a rational conclusion derived through use of the scientific method.
EqualAndFree 1 year ago
@EqualAndFree
You begin by denying reality, and then pose as if your scientific illiteracy isn't immaculate. Clearly, you are a devout Atheist.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull I'm not a "devout atheist", I'm merely an educated rationalist - and you are Bible-bashing trailer trash.
EqualAndFree 1 year ago
You religious evolutionary crocks are claiming that by empirical observations of fossil you can call your religion scientifically proven. Where is the empirical observation of one species coming out of another species, as an fully develloped brand new species ? do you have any scientifically observed cases in our known history for the last 6000 years ?. Do you ? no you don't. and you are braggin about your religious claims as proves of your extremly high IQ.....kiss my ass.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
You so-called religious crocks have hijacked the word evolution as an totally explanations of how life have come about. There have been big evolution in the machinery, but the word have nothing to do with how it has happenning. Like a machine in the machinery "evolution" it stands out fully functional, it dies, and a new species of machinery are there. I just wonder how the hell is that possible, in life.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn Why don't you learn how evolution works before churning out halfassed ideas about how it doesn't? The thoughly proven Theory of Evolution is not about how life first came about, it is about how life developed it's diversity. If you feel that you can disprove what all of the top scientists in the world have proven- do it! Get you a Nobel Prize and rub it in Richard Dawkin's face. If nothing else, learn something for a change.
Do those things or shut the hell up- your choice.
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
@TheOmegadusk
Why don't you learn what the word evolution means, and why don't you try to think for a change, instead of let others ( the state ) think for you. Try to think for a change even if you are not born with the capacity. Do those things or shut the fuck up, even when it's impossible for you.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn I know what evolution means but I am quite certain that you do not. Have you even looked up the definition in a current dictionary? I know, it must be hard to understand that there are multiple meanings for many of our English words.
Again, I invite you to disprove any one thing that scientists have proven concerning evolution. Doing so would make you insanely rich- what are you waiting for?
TheOmegadusk 1 year ago
Stand up for morality, speak what your understanding tells you, not for some other reason.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn i search for truth...if its god ..fine if its not..fine also...truth will lead you to atheism
arkee71 1 year ago
You evolutionists are deceptive, you use the word evolution in a deceptive way. It's reasonably proven there have been changes in life, species have gone and new have come. But how that have happen, is a theory. The Sumerians explanations is just as good as yours. As a matter of fact, it's much more logic.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn wrong...evolution is more than a guess...speciation phylogeny classification...are all very sound...a scientific theory is the highest competence science can reach..its a high as a law...it explains law...yet it never becomes a law..but its as high....gravity is a theory...the bible simply is a tall tale...we just have to admit that..or at least that the evidence leads us towards evolution as the best answer
arkee71 1 year ago
@arkee71
Speciation phylogeny classification.....is that your explanation of change in lifeforms. Your claims is a law, my ass. Leave the Bible out of it, I am not talking about the Bible.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn we know man is an ape...we disagree on how..but its known as ffact..much more than sumerian myth as you posted
arkee71 1 year ago
@arkee71
Well you might be an ape, but how evolution happening is a theory.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn right and theories are fact
arkee71 1 year ago
@arkee71
A theory is not a fact, gravity is reasonably a fact, but how it came about is a theory, evolution is reasonably a fact.....but how it happenned is a theory.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn what?...it is right now a theory...theories explain LAWS...theory is the highest achievment of a given field of study..you are very very wrong and lost
arkee71 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn we both are apes..that a proven FACT
arkee71 1 year ago
@arkee71
Well we are apes, ask an genetic, something have happenned to our chromosome, a couple are weled, and that cannot happen by chance, don't remember it exactly.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn anything can happen by chance in an eternity any one event will happen...thats an opinion on your part...you cant understand the odds...so you say it cant happen...which is false logic..you offer exactly no proof for a statement like that
arkee71 1 year ago
@arkee71
Your religion the so-called evolution, is based on empirical observation of fossil, but not on logic.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn correct logic should be based on facts...which fossil records are
arkee71 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn your wrong..you need to read up on what a scientific theory really is...its high as law..maybe higher
arkee71 1 year ago
@arkee71
Maybe you should open a Dictionary, and see what science means, it does not mean it's a law.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn your wrong...a theory is the HIGHEST level of science...it explains the law....gravity is theory...wanna dispute gravity? lol
arkee71 1 year ago
@arkee71
Your socalled science about development of species is rubbish, just as the so-called science about global warming is rubbish. And just as your global warming it's an religien invented with a purpose.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn see aronra's vid on falsifying phylogeny..it will help you understand better
arkee71 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@arkee71
Think and wonder, that will help you understand that you don't understand.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn wrong...you are a transitional species...man didnt come from apes ...he is an ape
arkee71 1 year ago
@arkee71
Well call it what you want, ape or man, according to you we the apes are all developed from the same species. According to you all living is developed from one another, to me it's just strange that it does not happen around me, there are no new species coming around. There are born millions of pigs every day, but no new species, when there is a change in anything born.....it's always negative, never positive.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
YES - stand up for fact-based education - evolution of one species to another is a theory, not yet evidenced...
jbooks888 1 year ago
I think the only thing that will save this nation is for someone to destroy it.
Take over, have a heavy hand. Create martial law, destroy all churches and kill most that are fundamentalists...have that going on for around 40 years and then go back to freedom, real freedom free of ignorant assholes that do shit like changing what is taught to fit their personal beliefs.
yeah, kill everyone that doesnt agree with my idea of not forcing beliefs on others
^.^
rdrakken 1 year ago
@rdrakken Well, thats what the Bible God teached with the flood, he killed almost all the people and animals, just to start again with a selected few.
You are a truth Christian! :-)
roner61 1 year ago
the overwhelming evidence for evolution..... opinion based on what???? not evidence since you cant have evidence for something that has no evidence. Or for something proven false and no way to scientifically recreate it. don't say it science when its just your belief, because religions believe in science and science only, not your religion aka belief.
lifecon1 1 year ago
One fine day with a woof and a purr
A baby was born and it caused a little stir
Regurtless 1 year ago
oh crap i live in texas!
flight454 1 year ago
Slickwick: You speak of evidence, not proof. There is no proof, only evidence to support the theory.
Roner, some who drink the kool-aid see evolution everywhere. You BELIEVE that the ancestors of dogs are wolves. Your faith is strong. Sadly, your command of the english language is not (the plural of wolf is not wolfs....)
A cat is a cat.
A zebra is a zebra.
A man is a man.
Keep the faith. Yours is strong.
Study english.
Clammypollack 1 year ago
@Clammypollack I already studied some english, french, german...but noone of those is mi native languaje.
"A cat is a cat" doesnt say anything, we know a cat is cat, and we also know they are relatives to lions,panthers, lynx, etc. whats your explanation of that?
E v o l u t i o n
E V O L U T I O N
E V O L U T I O N
i spell that slowly so you can understand mi grammar. .-)
roner61 1 year ago
@roner61
Do you understand the meaning of the word evolution.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn Yes, and you?
roner61 1 year ago
@roner61
What's is the definition of the word.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn
Rubbish, what's......or what is.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@Clammypollack life is life
FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 1 year ago