AGM-65 Maverick Hits

[CaptainsneakyMk5]

gotta love shape charge technology.

[whiteys1015]

its like killing a tank by dropping a building on it...

[NielsShoe]

AGM 65 is old but they braught out newer ones since the first one and it dont miss.

[ww2footage]

I bet Maverick can destroy even a tank equiped by active defence system like Arena

[franknbeans4761]

@ww2footage In all likelihood, it probably can. It is sometimes used for light anti-shipping purposes, having a warhead that weighs 125-300 pounds is completely overkill for a tank. I think the current US inventory is 30,000-40,000 missiles.

[Robbob9933]

@franknbeans4761 The Naval Maverick was designed for anti-shipping purposes. It will penetrate ANY currently active ship in any navy.

[franknbeans4761]

@Robbob9933 Well, it has a maximum range of 28 km. That is within most ship defenses, except smaller ships like corvettes & guided missile boats.

[Robbob9933]

@franknbeans4761 In a naval engagement, the opposition force composition would be known. HARMs would have taken care of any RADAR transmitters.  Then any CIWS would be overwhelmed by volume and direction.

[franknbeans4761]

@Robbob9933 It just depends on the force. That is correct. The HARM has an astonishing range of 106 km. And most ships cannot intercept such missiles unless with a TOR launcher or maybe a CIWS. But yes, it just depends, some ships have missiles that go outside 106 km, some don't.

[bubbascoutreb]

@noradnorthcom WAY TO KILL THE ENEMY! WANT NORTH AMERICA FIREPOWER!

[stalkingalizee]

I always loved that missile, it is really good even for being so old.

[adamlslda]

Fakk, this missle pwns armor.

BTW: What's is it's hit ratio in %?

[Robbob9933]

@adamlslda Navy designed seeker is very close to 100%. Air Force designed seeker 50%-75%. Air Force was considering adopting the Navy seeker when I left the program.

[bestamerica]

wow that is a so great video,,,

i wish america F-16 can shot a maverick missile hit and destroy all ussr russia T-72 to T-95 tanks

[cr9527]

u dont need Maverick to take out a T-72, they are falling apart on their own.

[TheRedWolf01]

@cr9527 Those are old M-60 Patton Tanks. :P And agreed.

[staffsgtamous]

@cr9527 lol probably true, since half of the worlds armies is using them!

[gosciu555]

@cr9527

Rolls eyes.

[gamekiiid]

@cr9527 Maverrick is big missile its destroyed evrythink hi want. xD

[monimstarfox]

pfft your being too generous all the pilots have to do is stare really hard at it and the tank will blow up into a fireball

[adamlslda]

There's no tank with T-95 designation, did you mean T-90 instead?

[MrXbox221]

@bestamerica

the t-95 is not out yet...before posting something think about it..

[adfujie]

完全照搬 wiki 的说明 ???

[22250rmntn]

@adfujie

No, not really.