I don't think you can support the argument that the bible says you can lie cheat steal, and merely ask God to forgive you. This is the practice of Christians, who are clearly not following God's teachings.
The evidence is clear. There are created organisms, and there may be some variations, but no evidence that any have evolved, ever. There are creation scientists, so evolution is not universally accepted as fact. It is a faith based system that contradicts creationism. It cannot be proven any more than creation can be proven. You must choose which faith you want to believe in. This is why you will stand and be judged because you chose to believe in evolution in order to deny God and his authority
There is evidence, hell, humans have OBSERVED bacteria evolving. As for other organisms that evolve slower, they've been observed evolving too, such as the peppered moth evolution during the industrial revoluvtion. (google it if you don't understand)
It is universally accepted among proper scientists as fact.
@MasterYangLi nothing has ever evolved ever. There are variations but it is limited. Bacteria may adapt, but have certain limits programmed in by the creator. The peppered moth is still a peppered moth, it has not changed genetically at all. Simple color differences are variations such as "breeds" in other animals, but are not evidence of evolution.
@darkfur35 You clearly didn't watch the video and just clicked on it to leave this stupid comment... pretty sad if you ask me. Evolution is scientific fact and fascinating.
@kiemul136 to call evolution a fact. That is very unscientific and very sad. Dan shectman won the noble prize for chemistry. He battled the established science was called stupid & lost jobs because he forced them to reconsider their conception of the very nature of matter. Dont live in a box.
All you keep saying is "u didnt watch da video tho". Clearly, you're implying that you completely believe something as complex as whether or not Evolution is real, by simply watching a youtube video. It IS a theory by the way, it has never been fully proven.
Look. You're not proving it's real by simply saying it's a fact. You're getting nowhere, and telling me something as USELESS as being a biology student doesn't do a thing. Now prove to me, that evolution is 100% fact. Again, the video proves nothing. It's a theory.
@TheSantaKruz No, I'm not proving anything, but is HAS been proven just as the "THEORY of relativity" has been proven and now is accepted as a fact in the scientific community.
"A theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena." Just because it's called a theory does not mean it's not a fact.
@TheSantaKruz Only a moron would deny the fact that evolution occurred. You might as well be denying that the Holocaust happened. Hopefully you will prove to be a sane and rational person and deny neither
@water2gashawaii Why dont you take those opinions back to the Alabama trailer park where they belong. Its amazing that people still dont understand and believe in evolution. Its a Fact! Only uneducated and ignorant people refuse to look at the overwhelming evidence for evolution.
@MrKGatl There is no evidence for evolution. You must believe it by faith, and preached by those who preach it. You have chosen to believe something you have never seen in order to deny the creator, whom you haven't seen the creation. You chose one faith over another, and you will stand in judgement before him.
@water2gashawaii Im sorry, but educated and intelligent people know better than to listen to religious extremists deny evolution simply because of their primitive myths they call religion. Its funny how any time something is complex you attribute it to god, well educated people find real answers and not fairy tales.
@water2gashawaii You must be joking. Religion is the biggest fraud. God is the biggest fraud. Evolution is backed by mountains of overwhelming evidence. If you do believe in God, how does he feel about your dishonestly about evolution. It is such an obvious fact. Why would so many diferent scientists all have the same conclusion, because its true. You only deny evolution because of your religious beliefs, which is ignorant, which is illogical
@MrKGatl you've been presented with the evidence that there are no intermediate fossil's, that all of the so called intermediate fossil evidence is fraud, that scientists know that the mutations are always detrimental, and that cells that do undergo mutations, always try to repair themselves back to the created original. That's why two deaf people born that way will have offspring that can hear. the mountain of evidence for evolution is all fabrication to support a lie. check into it.
@water2gashawaii There are literally millions of examples of intermediate fossils. You are just an ignorant and uneducated person to deny the obvious fact that is evolution. What primitive people you evolution denyers are. You might as well deny germ theory too. Check into what? If there were evidence lacking for evolution it would be very easy to make the entire theory fall apart, but there is no evidence against evolution, every piece points the same way. You are dishonest
@MrKGatl I'm not suggesting religion is without falsehood, I'm just saying that evolution is a complete fabrication. There is no evidence to support it whatsover, just speculation and outright fraud to support it. You should check out the video I posted as evidence. Go ahead and try to debunk it, you cannot. watch?v=SWDRz5cSziQ
@water2gashawaii You might as well deny the holocaust as well. Im guessing you're an America. In which case you would be a perfect example of how our schools have failed. You dont even understand or believe in evolution. Hawaii? I thought Alabama was the only place that evolution denyers still existed.
@MrKGatl have you observed a monkey evolve into a human? No you haven't but that doesn't stop you from believing it could happen over millions of years. The holocaust happened there were victims, and there were witnesses.
The scientific method requires evidence to be observed. If it is not observed it is not scientific. Evolution is not scientific. It cannot be replicated even under ideal conditions.
@MrKGatl Im not going to discuss this any longer. I really cannot believe that there are still people who dont understand evolution is this day and age. If you get to have ridiculous beliefs like evolution is a fraud, then I am no longer to believe in the existance of evolution denyers. So as of now I do not believe in you.
@MrKGatl you don't want to believe in me? well then you obviously don't give any care for the truth. I don't exist, and I didnt' type this. Maybe some random numbers in cyberspace is responsible for this post.
@water2gashawaii I guess you're right, since there most likely is no god, it wouldnt make sense for me to call him a fraud. I might as well call the Flying spaghetti Monster or Zeus a fraud
@MrKGatl Whenever someone states there is a mountain of evidence, when you examine the evidence, it shows trees and species of animals, and lines that connect them. We are supposed to accept the belief that one changed into another. If this were true there would be intermediary steps in the fossils but alas there are none. So the evolutionists say well sometimes things evolve very quickly and leave no evidence, others say the fossil record is incomplete. In other words believe by faith.
@water2gashawaii What is wrong with you? Ther are millions of examples of transitional fossils. It is you who are denying the plain and simple evidence. Answer me this--Why is it that evolution is studied by and supported by educated people and uneducated people deny evolution? Dont say this isnt true, people who have been to college are much more likely to believe in evolution.
@water2gashawaii Last thing I will say, is that I think you are a purposefully dishonest person. You make claims that there is evidence against evolution, which there is not and you claim that scientists from every country over the last 150 years are conspiring and fabricating evidence because they dont want to believe in god. You should be in a mental institution if you really believe this. Even the Pope and the Catholic church dont deny evolution.
@MrKGatl its also funny that when presented with evidence that contradicts ones beliefs, that it is summarily rejected without even looking into it. It sounds to me that you are the one that is behaving like a religious nut. "Don't confuse me with the evidence, my mind is made up."
So a theory is an educated guess and a scientific theory is a scientific educated guess. I agree with the other guy. Science still can't explain why it happened in the first place. Fact: things are either done on accident or on purpose. Either human life was done with a purpose. or we are an accident within an accident (animal life) within another accident (earth) within another (solar system) within another (galaxy) within another (universe).
@DarkAffliction6 Sorry, but anyone who is liked by a guy named a1mint on youtube, I automaticly start to question. It is physicly impossibe to have your head so far up your ass, that you need to open your mouth to see, but that guy is living proof that it can be done. Anyone with an opinion other than is own is literaly listed as delutional on his channel, even when I can prove what I'm saying, I'm still wrong,
lol last words almost made me crack XD so basically what u r saying is that scientists dont have a freakin clue how evolution is occurring, they just made up a sloppy theory how they want things to be, so now they are selling it to us as a fact, which they cant proof cause they dont have any proofs of it. if anybody needs a simple hardass language translator just contact me. ill be glad to help :)
@itssaab To be precise, Evolution is all about the way life has changed with time - the change from one form to another. Strictly speaking, therefore, theories of evolution (such as Natural Selection) do not offer any explanation for the origin of life. In natural science, "Abiogenesis" is the study of how biological life arises from inorganic matter through natural processes. Evolution by Natural Selection and Abiogenesis are similar only in that they offer explanations from nature alone.
@mnc316 evolution is not observable, you can't watch it taking place, you are misinformed. You can just look at the result of the things that clue to it, but you can't observe evolution taking place. Hence, this is why it is a scientific theory.
@Deioproductions By "evolution", I meant the gradual change in forms over multiple generations. Archeologists infer evolution from the fossil record but evolution has also now been directly observed in the lab as well as the field. The word "theory" used in a *scientific* sense means there is a large, almost unassailable body of evidence to support the idea it applies to, such as the germ theory of disease or the theory of gravity. In this sense, Evolution by Natural Selection is a Theory.
@mnc316 it's not an observable fact though, that is where you are wrong. you can't watch an organism literally evolving to have direct evidence, which is what you need for an observable fact.
@Deioproductions You demand to see a fish sprout legs, right? Nobody is arguing that happened. I know it may be frightening, but you may need to learn a little more about evolutionary theory in order to try refute it.
To get you started, watch 0:50 to 1:00 over again.
@hagenar Lol, I believe in evolution and I understand how it happened. The fact is that it is not observable, because no one can see something literally evolving in front of them. We can only pile mountains of evidence together that points to evolution. You just don't know what an observable fact is that was where I was trying to correct you.
@Deioproductions That had been my first comment. I miscontrued yours. You have a very restrictive definition for the word 'observable'.
I should clarify for anyone reading these comments who may be confused by your statements. Using a conventional definition, evolution is indeed observable across generations. i.e., Scientists can see groups of organisms acquiring new traits, and passing them on, right in front of their eyes. Observable, in the classic definition of the word.
@Deioproductions sorry to interfere but ur words really concern me. well the problem is when someone atually sees a ghost with his own eyes, feels the chill with his skin and feels unreasonable fear with whole his body, and then tell everybody what he saw, everybody will just laugh at him and will come up with THEIR ideas of how it was and what he saw(yeah i know its despicable), but when scientists are giving us the evolution crap, which they never observed and all their proof of it are quite
@Deioproductions fishy, we cant say a word to oppose to them because now we will get laughed at. where is the logyc? and btw for how long do u think humanity is breeding dogs? several thousands of years right? so what do u think did any dog turned into a more supreme being? nope :) did any of them got extra tail or wings? nope :) did any of them got stronger than a wolf? nope :) but they were breded in order to be stronger and better than wolves, so why after this many crossbreeds occurring
@Deioproductions we cant see any significant changes in them (if we wont count zillion different breeds of them)? why the dogs are still dogs? in fact with breeding humanity made selection breeding which would took nature like couple millions of years, because now dogs werent crossbreeding by chance, they were breed to got better, more superior offspring and still we see no evolution whatsoever. what scientists do is they barage us with their new "discoveries" and ideas about them
@Deioproductions what i and people like me do is giving people logical ideas which they can think over and come up with their own decisions and think what they want to think, not what other are telling them to. and if the evolution is true, then why in ur school textbooks all the "facts" about evolution, and biogenesis and other stuff are lies? (i put this other two disciplines in cuz they are theories that are built on top of each other)
@Deioproductions you actually can. This fact is behind many medical breakthroughs. We have manipulated bacteria through facilitated evolution as well as direct splicing of gene sequences. This has bee done for pure research and also for commercial profit. germs have evolved in response to our antibiotics. Insects have evolved to resist our pesticides. It is very much an observable fact.
@Deioproductions you actually can. This fact is behind many medical breakthroughs. We have manipulated bacteria through facilitated evolution as well as direct splicing of gene sequences. This has been done for pure research and also for commercial profit. germs have evolved in response to our antibiotics. Insects have evolved to resist our pesticides. It is very much an observable fact.
nice video. sure, evolution is real. do people _______ think it isn't? it's important to realize the amazing power of our choice in words. words make lots of difference.
fill in the blank: a. truly b. really c. actually 4. literally
the evolution of a cup of coffee is the purpose for my choice to embody on earth. for realz, yo.
Evidence for evolutionism. Appeal to authority arguments and hack on Christians. Evolutionism is dead. Why don't you get a new theory that doesn't include God. This time don't use my tax dollars to spread it.
@xXsakkelaoXx Sure & also teach all other mythologies & pseudo sciences along side these theories & also mislabel them theories. We can start by having astrology classes taught along side astronomy,numerology taught with science, blood letting, voodoo, faith healing, taught along side medical science, psyonics taught along side neurology.
Open the doors to pseudo sciences &/or mythologies like creation where will it end, how many creation stories are there that would have to be included?
@xXsakkelaoXx Aside from: Dna, fossils, repeateble tests and has already given us some things like: Improved medicine, better selective breeding, and even a system to improve products in computer programs with high speed natural selection.
@JuiceBoxheero There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny!
It is the backbone of Biology, accepted by all scientists.
@Huttate1 Thats rather ironic as you based on your assumption of creation being a myth, you yourself believe we all came from a stone som billion years ago.
@xXsakkelaoXx No assumption. There is the evidence of scientific discovery to refute the myth and no evidence to support it.
Also: I do not 'believe' anything. I 'think', based on the observations, reasoning and testing of countless scientists over the centuries.
Finally: the 'we came from a stone' rubbish is one of the creationist arguments based on total ignorance of the theory of evolution or a deliberate attempt to distort the facts to their own ends. Neither of which flatters them.
@xXsakkelaoXx It originated when the cloud clown pulled out one of Adam's ribs. Caused a real storm when Vesalius proved that women and men have the same number of ribs in 1543.
The point is that I do not have to know how and when evolution took the two sex procreation step. I would love to know and look forward to any theories. It is these gaps in knowledge that rational people try to fill using science and the deranged glibly fill with their stone age myths.
@gangsterper its funny how he says that evolution is a fact and then 2 seconds later he says the theory of evolution. and me watching this video has nothing to do with my comment :P didnt you read the bible?!
@xXsakkelaoXx Is it not funny that you dont know the means of a scientific theory!! That you actually wrote that comment without trying to understand what a theory is by scientific terms! Fascinating!!
@gangsterper :D soooo if someone makes a youtube video and gave you arguments for creation and said it was a fact, does that make it so? science is something that has to have been observed, evolution isnt observed and has no arguments for it. THATS FUNNY
@xXsakkelaoXx Because what he speaks of in the video is known to anyone with an education... simple as that! If you want to learn about scientific method, how science works and has worked for a good period of time now, making you able to use computers, cellphones, enjoy advanced medicine etc... you can start by reading about scientific theory on wiki. Then maby about the theory of evolution. Stop making a fool out of yourself...
@xXsakkelaoXx Evolution is history huh? so.....how do you suppose we'll survive the next 1000 yrs. without evolving to be more resistant to strains of bacteria? How do you suppose we'll survive the next 10,000 years without evolving to be able to adapt to extreme temperatures? How do you suppose we'll adapt to life on other planets....nay my delusional Parishee, Evolution is VERY MUCH necessary to our future, every bit as much as it's a part of history of life on earth.
@darthjader08 so your saying evolution can happen in less then 10 000 years. Actually your saying a 1000 years. Man your an idiot. Go study your own theory... And btw evolution is literally history its about how animals changed in the past. man your mind is poluted
@xXsakkelaoXx Well, if you're going to criticize someone (falsly) you should perhaps work on your punctuation (it's "you're an idiot", and it's spelled "polluted"). I'm guessing you didn't go look up any of those examples, did you. Micro evolution can occur in a very short period of time (within 2-3 generations), over hundreds of thousands of years many micro evolutionary changes can lead to a change in species, or even genus given enough time. The Spotted moth example, occurred ...cont'd.
@xXsakkelaoXx ....cont'd....occurred over the course of less than a decade, BUT was only on largely noticeable levels after a full decade....and the change from a lighter, spotted colour....to darker, more black colours....then back to the lighter more spotted colour took place with the rise and fall of the Industrial revolution, so all in all, a little less than 200 years. The HIV Virus evolved over the course of less than a decade.
@xXsakkelaoXx The Pine example (and I typo'd earlier, it was Lodgepole Pine, not Ponderosa Pine), took place over about 10,000 years, and it has been observed because ancient North American tribes documented cone shape, size, and composition, at which time the seeds were released shortly after hitting the ground, now however, the cones remain sealed, until they are exposed to intense heat (i.e. from a forest fire), which may seem detrimental, except that the seeds can remain viable for....cont'd
@xXsakkelaoXx ...cont'd... that is, viable AND protected, for several hundred years, in fact there have been Lodgepole Pine cones found that were thousands of years old, that had been covered by sediment, and sealed away, only to be released, with the seeds still viable....this allows the Lodgepole Pine to be more productive. Now, every tree stand has a fire go through it every 3-200 years, it's a fact, depending on what type of tree stand, moisture content, etc. it's good for treestand..cont'd
@xXsakkelaoXx ....cont'd...health, however, in the last 2 centuries, humans have created a problem: Excessive fire suppression, forest fires are essential to forest health, we used to put them out the moment they started (now we've taken on more of a control approach, rather than suppress), as a result, Lodgepole Pine did not reproduce as it normally would have, leading to less diverse woodstands...i.e. we fucked up evolution in that case....however, they are recovering....cont'd..
@xXsakkelaoXx Yes, evolution IS history, however knowledge of that history is relevant to us because it is not limited to history, but is also essential to our future, continuance of our species, as well as millions of other diverse species on this planet (which we rely on to survive). The Galapagos Islands have hundreds of examples of observed evolution btw. On the contrary, I know what I'm talking about, you do not, I have a degree in Environmental Sciences, which automatically denotes.cont'd
@xXsakkelaoXx ...cont'd...that I have more knowledge about the study of evolution than you EVER will. So, plz, stop being an idiot, and accept that it is a well documented and (although rarely, due to the extended period of time over which it takes place) OBSERVABLE FACT of life on this planet (and likely many others). To summarize: micro evolution can be witnessed in as little time as one generation to the next i.e. less than a decade, Macro evolution takes place over thousands of years.cont'd
@xXsakkelaoXx ...cont'd...and is made up of MANY MANY instances of micro evolution. So get it straight FOOL. As for mental pollution: yah, I have a lot going on in this mind, sometimes I get absent minded as a result (such as using "observed" in place of "evolution", that doesn't make me wrong, it means I might make minor mistakes here and there. You on the other hand, have a very weak grasp of what Evolution is all about, and have been brainwashed to believe it's bullshit, THAT is polluted.
@xXsakkelaoXx I assume by "dog" you mean Canis Familiaris, yet their common ancestor is in Fact the wolf, otherwise known as Canis Lupus, being of a different species, Canis Familiaris cannot successfully breed with Canis Lupus, but oh, wait there are SOME Sub species of Canis Familiaris which CAN successfully breed with Canis Lupus. So what does this mean? That ALL dogs have a common ancestor (wolves), and that some sub species of dogs are more closely related to Wolves...cont'd
@xXsakkelaoXx ....cont'd....which means your entire "theory" (colloquial usage) that Micro evolution cannot equate to Macro evolution with enough instances...just went out the window. Members of the same family (in this case Canidae) cannot reproduce, members of the same Genus, sometimes can, and members of the same species always can. I'm assuming by "kinds" you mean species, yet here you are, proven that "kinds" can change over time. Dude, go out and learn something about Evolution.
@xXsakkelaoXx So, to summarize: Many instances of micro evolution translate to Macro evolution (a change in genus, family, order, class, phylum, and even Kingdom, given enough time) i.e., outside of "kinds". Your lack of understanding for the terminology ("kinds"? sounds like creationist bullshit to me) clearly illustrates you do not know enough about Science to really be able to say anything, as you clearly do not have much knowledge on the subject, and are just making personal assumptions.
@xXsakkelaoXx As for witnessed examples of Macro Evolution, you show me someone who has lived 10,000 years or more, and I will show you someone who has witnessed it. Until then, you have no fucking right to ask, as fossil records are the only other potential evidence.
@darthjader08 you cant really prove anything with fossils, btw how do you tell the age of them? C14? other methods or do you look into wich rocklayer of time they are found in? btw a wolf and a dog is more or less the same thing.
@xXsakkelaoXx Wolf: Canis Lupus Domesticated dog: Canis Familiaris. Same Genus, different species. Typically interspecies breeding is NOT possible, however (with a low success rate) Lupus and Familiaris can interbreed. Very clear evidence that domestic dogs evolved from wolves.
There are over 20 different methods of dating fossils (or anything organic) , none of which can be considered accurate on their own, but used in conjunction, VERY accurate.
@darthjader08 Actualy house dogs are devolved, they were mated to get the kinder gentler trait. U see. Which is why they do not have dominant colors. Wolves have bigger brains, a bigger smell receptors. They also can survive by themselves, unlike housedogs. Chi waa waaa, and smaller dogs are even dumber, since they were mated for cuteness.,and which is why they have have tumors and such.
@Dudex58 There's no such thing as de-evolution. Your understanding of it is incorrect, what you're referring to is fitness for survival, which has been bred out of the species. This is, in fact, still evolution, through manipulation, i.e. selective breeding. You're also incorrect in the statment "they do not have dominant colours", ALL pure bred dogs have dominant colours, the ones that don't are a result of a mix of species, which makes complete sense. Jack Russels, Border Collies...cont'd...
@Dudex58 ...cont'd...and a number of other species are all as intelligent as wolves, which is comparative to the intelligence of a toddler (shit, one of my Jack Russels figured out how to turn off my alarm clock, entirely on her own, I sincerely doubt a domesticated wolf would be able to exhibit greater intelligence). Wolves do have a bigger Cerebrum, which is what gives them an improved sense of smell, not "bigger smell receptors" as you put it....cont'd...
@Dudex58 ...cont'd....WTF are you talking about??? There have been NUMEROUS documented cases of domesticated dogs surviving on their own, both in the wild and in urban areas. My own Jack Russel survived entirely on her own for 3 months, after running away from her previous owner (she came back eventually...something about uncontrollable loyalty I figure, but then that's how she met me and was given a better life), and she kept herself in perfect health. The "de-evolution" you refer to...cont'd..
@Dudex58 ...cont'd...is a result of thousands of years of inbreeding...and not needing to rely on a higher sense of smell. I've met some very intelligent Chi wa waa's (I hate them too), but due to their stature (and in case you haven't noticed, they have large brains for their size, compared to other breeds) they are insecure, and rarely exhibit their intelligence. Again, "tumours and such" are a result of inbreeding, not de-evolution.
@Dudex58 Ur right about there not being a category known as deevolution, but I needed something to word it. I was out of word pallets. Like u said they manipulated breeding for the kinder, gentler, lighter colored animals. In the animal kingdom though they mate for survival and fitness. Which is why house dogs are lower animals, because they have weak traits. Unless breeded for strength and so on. But most people just want cuteness, and kind dogs =dumb gullible dogs.
@Dudex58 Jack russels, Boxers, Mastiffs, Doberman's, Pit Bulls, etc. are all breeds that can be quite vicious (shit, I once saw my 18lb Jack Russel tear up a very vicious Boxer nearly 10x her size, and other than shaking uncontrollably afterwards, she walked away, unscathed, covered in his blood, the owner, who had let him loose on me - because she peed on his lawn - threatened to call animal control, I pointed out that they wouldn't believe that an 18lb dog on a leash would not...cont'd...
@darthjader08 Did say unless mated for else wise. Notice most of these dogs R sorta illegal 2 have. They bite kids & R very wild. Proved my point. Notice how they R ugly & the better hunters. Wolves still beat the shit out of them.lol Jack Russels? Frasier Dog as I call it. Although it is smartt it does suffer from sickness as well & couldn't survive in the wild. All these dogs lost a certain trait from human interceding with their mating. Which is why natural wolves as specimen rain supreme.
@Dudex58 cont'd...no more or less aesthetically pleasing than other breeds. The only potential health risks with Jack Russels, is Hip displacia (sp?), but it is rare, and as long as you're careful about breeding, it won't show up. Like I said, mine survived 3 months perfectly fine, and was intelligent enough she probably could have survived her entire life in the wild. Wolves don't reign supreme, other canines are more successful than wolves...but as pack hunters, in larger numbers.
@Dudex58 ...cont'd...attack a large vicious dog under normal circumstances, and would likely side with me).
lol, yah, they are kinda like rodents with more personality (even my ferret, which is not a rodent, but a mustelid, had less personality than most Chi wa waa's), but they are different family, genus, and species...
You know what determines a rodent, right? It's actually kind of ridiculous that something so minor would determine the family name....but it does.
@darthjader08 I kinda forgot why rodents and dogs are difered, but please elaborate. I would say the tail and feet, and the ability to mass produce and carry viruses. I wouldn't say size because I seen rats bigger than chi wa waas/ But thats just a guess.
@Dudex58 I don't have time to comment on everything, but I'll say this and get to the rest later. It's the teeth, rodentia are the ONLY mammals whose teeth are constantly growing, and they have to wear them down or they will grow too long and they will die. that's the ONLY thing that defines rodents as rodents.
@darthjader08 or rather, differentiates between family Rodentia, and...say Mustelidae.
Those breeds have a tendency to be more vicious than other breeds (that was what we were discussing, was it not? being tough?), so of course they're more likely to bite. Having said that, raised properly, they are no more dangerous than other breeds (unless you attack their owner). Most of those breeds aren't so ugly, they're more muscular and not as sleek as other breeds, but otherwise they're...cont'd...
@xXsakkelaoXx "btw how do you tell the age of them? C14? other methods or do you look into wich rocklayer of time they are found in?" The last two, primarily. C14 is not reliable beyond 60,000 years so it is excluded in general consideration.
The rock layer, and the ages of both surrounding layers and fossils, are used for relative comparison. However generally the most reliable method of absolute dating is cross-analysis between multi-radiation isotopes of the layers and (rarely) bones.
And wolves are a different species than dogs. Which means that they are NOT "more or less the same thing".
Of course even if they WERE, that would be evidence FOR evolution in that they are "the same thing" yet have such a wide variety of differences between them. They would then undeniably share a common ancestor, as Evolution predicts.
(FYI, the fossil record connects the common ancestor with the rest of the animal kingdom.)
@onijester56 Uhhhh....different species, same genus, and they are capable of inter breeding (which technically makes them different sub species, not different species), so yes, they are more or less the same thing.
@xXsakkelaoXx WTF are you talking about???? There are MANY MANY observed cases of observation, I can think of 3, right now, off the top of my head: Spotted Moth in Europe in the 19th century, Ponderosa Pine Cones, HIV/Aids virus. Look them up.
Wasn't it Hitler who said if you tell a lie loud enough and long enough people will believe it? Stating that something is fact does not make it so. "Observable phenomenon" ? You've got to be kidding.
@EatTheRedOne Evolution is a fact. It's confirmed as an observable phenomenon. It's just that scientists call it a "Scientific Theory" because the word "Scientific Fact" is already used to describe a single proven hypothesis, while a theory is an embodiment of all the facts. Regardless of terminology, the meaning is the same.
First off, I doubt you could find 1000 priests that believe in God. Second off... If evolutionism is true, why don't you just shut up? If you're so convinced your theories are true, then go find something better to do with your time. Since there's no consequence for your actions because there is no God, maybe you could knock off a 7/11 tonight. Look at all the stuff Hitler did because he believed in evolutionism. Maybe you could get some ideas from him. Maybe you could plan a world dictatorship.
@EatTheRedOne Not believing in God does not mean a lack of morality. Also, we correct and educate people about evolution because we don't want people not knowing the facts and spreading them to others.
@seajist Yes, that will be fun. Hanging out with all the scientists and musicians and other "evil sinners". You pedohile muslims can have your "fun up in Heaven with those 72 virgins"...that's not very appealing to normal, intelligent people anyway:)
@seajist Why would anyone believe you if your cursing, defying your own religion. Aren't you going to hell too then. How can you escape your impending judgement?
@iswear12345 rofl you have a little penis so as far as i am concerned you arent even part of humanity so idk why i am talking to you allah have mercy infidel
@seajist You never even answered my question. If you have no defense for what you believe then why do believe it in the first place. Please give my one reason why I should believe in allah or the quran.
Sheesh. This idiot thinks a theory is the same as a law of science. Go figure, he believes in ideas formed in a day when people rode horses and used candles for light.
@NephilimFree Wow you're stupid. A THEORY in scientific terms is NOT the same thing as a theory in every day language. Also, what difference does it make if it was thought of when people rode horses and used candles to read. By that logic, why dont we get rid of EVERYTHING that was thought of from that time period i.e. the Theory of Gravity, Religion, Crop Cultivation, the Constitution, Democracy, etc. Yeah lets get rid of all of those because they were created at a time where people rode horses
@nephilimfail1 If you believe that you completely lack an understanding of science. Theories are hypothesis, and the formation of evey hypothesis is an assumption or observation. Unfortunately for evos, evolution was an idea born by men seeking a way to deny the creator in an era when people rode horses and used candles for light. Modern science has demonstated countles time and in every way that it is not nor ever was scientific.
@NephilimFree theories are tested hypothesis, you are prtly right though the formation of a hypothesis is based on observation
therefore your flood/lunar speculation is not even an hypothesis as you did not even observe the moon yourself, you do not do any maths and misunderstand physics
unfortunateely for the creatards religion was born out of the inability to explain things
@NephilimFree "If you believe that you completely lack an understanding of science." This statement comes from a man with no understanding of science, so you will not find people taking it seriously.
"Theories are hypothesis (sic)". No, theories are not hypotheses.
Theories are COMPRISED of facts. They attempt to EXPLAIN the facts. The better theories explain the facts more thoroughly. Do you know so little that you have not even figured this out? Apparently, the answer is yes.
@NephilimFree "Unfortunately for evos, evolution was an idea born by men seeking a way to deny the creator". Absolute bullshit.
"in an era when people rode horses and used candles for light" Coming from someone who thinks a bronze age book written by nomadic herdsman is the word of a supernatural ghost, this is especially ironic.
" Modern science has demonstated countles time and in every way that it is not nor ever was scientific." The TOE is a part of modern science, you ignoramus.
@NF "Modern science has demonstated countles time and in every way that it is not...scientific."
Todd Wood, Phd (biochem), YEC and director of the Center for Origins Rsch @Bryan college: "Evolution is not a theory in crisis, it has not failed as a scientific explanation. There is evidence for evolution, gobs and gobs of it. It is not just speculation or a faith choice or an assumption or a religion. There is no conspiracy to hide the truth about the failure of evolution"
@NephilimFree In science a law is less than a theory, a theory explains things a law does no such thing
BTW the time use the come up with a theory does in no way reflect on it's use, besides the TOE was not formed in a day, only a "bog boy" like you would think that
@NephilimFree That's extremely ironic and hilarious coming from a man who believes the bible that was written by man over 2000 years ago is the word of God. Not to mention a literal 6 day creation and is a geo centrist. Just fade away from youtube alright. You have been utterly destroyed by countless people on here. Get some mental help in all seriousness.
If you aren't going to show me where I'm wrong and just make blanket statements, this conversation is a mere gathering of fools and I will have no part in a fruitless conversation. When you wake up to reality, it will blow your mind and you will fall to your knees and worship God with all your heart. That is my prayer for you and everyone reading this. ...God, they know not what they do. Forgive them I pray. Amen!
I don't think you can support the argument that the bible says you can lie cheat steal, and merely ask God to forgive you. This is the practice of Christians, who are clearly not following God's teachings.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
see ww.icr. org/article/6416/
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
The evidence is clear. There are created organisms, and there may be some variations, but no evidence that any have evolved, ever. There are creation scientists, so evolution is not universally accepted as fact. It is a faith based system that contradicts creationism. It cannot be proven any more than creation can be proven. You must choose which faith you want to believe in. This is why you will stand and be judged because you chose to believe in evolution in order to deny God and his authority
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
There is evidence, hell, humans have OBSERVED bacteria evolving. As for other organisms that evolve slower, they've been observed evolving too, such as the peppered moth evolution during the industrial revoluvtion. (google it if you don't understand)
It is universally accepted among proper scientists as fact.
MasterYangLi 1 month ago
@MasterYangLi nothing has ever evolved ever. There are variations but it is limited. Bacteria may adapt, but have certain limits programmed in by the creator. The peppered moth is still a peppered moth, it has not changed genetically at all. Simple color differences are variations such as "breeds" in other animals, but are not evidence of evolution.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@MasterYangLi No evidence whatsoever see watch?v=SWDRz5cSziQ
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
BULLSHIT
phantomscolts1 1 month ago
Evolution never happened......There is only misinterpreted data to support it.
darkfur35 2 months ago
@darkfur35 Lol
ItsEasyIfYouThink 1 month ago
@ItsEasyIfYouThink lol..... thank you for agreeing with me.
darkfur35 1 month ago
evolution is a bad fariy tale. stop scaring the kids with these horror stories.
darkfur35 4 months ago
@darkfur35 You clearly didn't watch the video and just clicked on it to leave this stupid comment... pretty sad if you ask me. Evolution is scientific fact and fascinating.
kiemul136 3 months ago
@kiemul136 to call evolution a fact. That is very unscientific and very sad. Dan shectman won the noble prize for chemistry. He battled the established science was called stupid & lost jobs because he forced them to reconsider their conception of the very nature of matter. Dont live in a box.
darkfur35 3 months ago
@darkfur35 What are you talking about... watch this video it explains very clearly why its a fact.
kiemul136 3 months ago
@kiemul136
All you keep saying is "u didnt watch da video tho". Clearly, you're implying that you completely believe something as complex as whether or not Evolution is real, by simply watching a youtube video. It IS a theory by the way, it has never been fully proven.
TheSantaKruz 3 months ago
@TheSantaKruz Well I'm a biology student and Evolution does not require belief; it's, officially, a scientific fact.
kiemul136 3 months ago
@kiemul136
Look. You're not proving it's real by simply saying it's a fact. You're getting nowhere, and telling me something as USELESS as being a biology student doesn't do a thing. Now prove to me, that evolution is 100% fact. Again, the video proves nothing. It's a theory.
TheSantaKruz 3 months ago
@TheSantaKruz No, I'm not proving anything, but is HAS been proven just as the "THEORY of relativity" has been proven and now is accepted as a fact in the scientific community.
"A theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena." Just because it's called a theory does not mean it's not a fact.
kiemul136 3 months ago
@TheSantaKruz Only a moron would deny the fact that evolution occurred. You might as well be denying that the Holocaust happened. Hopefully you will prove to be a sane and rational person and deny neither
MrKGatl 2 months ago
@MrKGatl only a moron would believe they came from apes.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii Why dont you take those opinions back to the Alabama trailer park where they belong. Its amazing that people still dont understand and believe in evolution. Its a Fact! Only uneducated and ignorant people refuse to look at the overwhelming evidence for evolution.
MrKGatl 1 month ago
@MrKGatl There is no evidence for evolution. You must believe it by faith, and preached by those who preach it. You have chosen to believe something you have never seen in order to deny the creator, whom you haven't seen the creation. You chose one faith over another, and you will stand in judgement before him.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@MrKGatl You who think you are educated, are in fact fools, for your education is worthless.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@MrKGatl See Integrated Complexity argument watch?v=uKu059GCucU&feature=related
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@MrKGatl There is no evidence for evolution: see watch?v=SWDRz5cSziQ&feature=related
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@MrKGatl There is no evidence for evolution: see watch?v=SWDRz5cSziQ
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii Im sorry, but educated and intelligent people know better than to listen to religious extremists deny evolution simply because of their primitive myths they call religion. Its funny how any time something is complex you attribute it to god, well educated people find real answers and not fairy tales.
MrKGatl 1 month ago
@MrKGatl Evolution is the fairy tail, you have been deceived by the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on mankind. see watch?v=SWDRz5cSziQ
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii You must be joking. Religion is the biggest fraud. God is the biggest fraud. Evolution is backed by mountains of overwhelming evidence. If you do believe in God, how does he feel about your dishonestly about evolution. It is such an obvious fact. Why would so many diferent scientists all have the same conclusion, because its true. You only deny evolution because of your religious beliefs, which is ignorant, which is illogical
MrKGatl 1 month ago
@MrKGatl you've been presented with the evidence that there are no intermediate fossil's, that all of the so called intermediate fossil evidence is fraud, that scientists know that the mutations are always detrimental, and that cells that do undergo mutations, always try to repair themselves back to the created original. That's why two deaf people born that way will have offspring that can hear. the mountain of evidence for evolution is all fabrication to support a lie. check into it.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii There are literally millions of examples of intermediate fossils. You are just an ignorant and uneducated person to deny the obvious fact that is evolution. What primitive people you evolution denyers are. You might as well deny germ theory too. Check into what? If there were evidence lacking for evolution it would be very easy to make the entire theory fall apart, but there is no evidence against evolution, every piece points the same way. You are dishonest
MrKGatl 1 month ago
@MrKGatl I'm not suggesting religion is without falsehood, I'm just saying that evolution is a complete fabrication. There is no evidence to support it whatsover, just speculation and outright fraud to support it. You should check out the video I posted as evidence. Go ahead and try to debunk it, you cannot. watch?v=SWDRz5cSziQ
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii You might as well deny the holocaust as well. Im guessing you're an America. In which case you would be a perfect example of how our schools have failed. You dont even understand or believe in evolution. Hawaii? I thought Alabama was the only place that evolution denyers still existed.
MrKGatl 1 month ago
@MrKGatl have you observed a monkey evolve into a human? No you haven't but that doesn't stop you from believing it could happen over millions of years. The holocaust happened there were victims, and there were witnesses.
The scientific method requires evidence to be observed. If it is not observed it is not scientific. Evolution is not scientific. It cannot be replicated even under ideal conditions.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@MrKGatl Im not going to discuss this any longer. I really cannot believe that there are still people who dont understand evolution is this day and age. If you get to have ridiculous beliefs like evolution is a fraud, then I am no longer to believe in the existance of evolution denyers. So as of now I do not believe in you.
MrKGatl 1 month ago
@MrKGatl therefore even with facts in front of you you deny them, you are an evolution religion fanatic.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@MrKGatl you don't want to believe in me? well then you obviously don't give any care for the truth. I don't exist, and I didnt' type this. Maybe some random numbers in cyberspace is responsible for this post.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@MrKGatl God is not the fraud. Only those who misrepresent him are.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii I guess you're right, since there most likely is no god, it wouldnt make sense for me to call him a fraud. I might as well call the Flying spaghetti Monster or Zeus a fraud
MrKGatl 1 month ago
@MrKGatl Whenever someone states there is a mountain of evidence, when you examine the evidence, it shows trees and species of animals, and lines that connect them. We are supposed to accept the belief that one changed into another. If this were true there would be intermediary steps in the fossils but alas there are none. So the evolutionists say well sometimes things evolve very quickly and leave no evidence, others say the fossil record is incomplete. In other words believe by faith.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii What is wrong with you? Ther are millions of examples of transitional fossils. It is you who are denying the plain and simple evidence. Answer me this--Why is it that evolution is studied by and supported by educated people and uneducated people deny evolution? Dont say this isnt true, people who have been to college are much more likely to believe in evolution.
MrKGatl 1 month ago
@MrKGatl sophistry. the educated engage in it.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@MrKGatl I'm educated, I went to college. I just know that the facts are in and evolution is a fraud.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii Last thing I will say, is that I think you are a purposefully dishonest person. You make claims that there is evidence against evolution, which there is not and you claim that scientists from every country over the last 150 years are conspiring and fabricating evidence because they dont want to believe in god. You should be in a mental institution if you really believe this. Even the Pope and the Catholic church dont deny evolution.
MrKGatl 1 month ago
@MrKGatl its also funny that when presented with evidence that contradicts ones beliefs, that it is summarily rejected without even looking into it. It sounds to me that you are the one that is behaving like a religious nut. "Don't confuse me with the evidence, my mind is made up."
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@MrKGatl I'm not denying evolution for religious reasons, but from solid science.
There is no empirical evidence or scientific method that could prove evolution a fact.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii Why do 99% of all scientists and evolution researchers believe evolution is true?
MrKGatl 1 month ago
@MrKGatl because they desperately want to believe there is no God, and deny his authority here on earth.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@darkfur35 If I were as uneducated and ignorant as you I would keep it to myself
MrKGatl 2 months ago
bravo bravo well done well done. im just so curious as to how creationists respond to this video.. like really u got it straight and clear.
abarbar06 5 months ago
So a theory is an educated guess and a scientific theory is a scientific educated guess. I agree with the other guy. Science still can't explain why it happened in the first place. Fact: things are either done on accident or on purpose. Either human life was done with a purpose. or we are an accident within an accident (animal life) within another accident (earth) within another (solar system) within another (galaxy) within another (universe).
wcemichael 5 months ago
@wcemichael You totally missed what he said... It is NOT a guess in anyway... the theory EXPLAINS the facts and observations of Evolution.
DarkAffliction6 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DarkAffliction6 Sorry, but anyone who is liked by a guy named a1mint on youtube, I automaticly start to question. It is physicly impossibe to have your head so far up your ass, that you need to open your mouth to see, but that guy is living proof that it can be done. Anyone with an opinion other than is own is literaly listed as delutional on his channel, even when I can prove what I'm saying, I'm still wrong,
wcemichael 5 months ago
Ya, what he just said.
MEGAONE302 6 months ago
lol last words almost made me crack XD so basically what u r saying is that scientists dont have a freakin clue how evolution is occurring, they just made up a sloppy theory how they want things to be, so now they are selling it to us as a fact, which they cant proof cause they dont have any proofs of it. if anybody needs a simple hardass language translator just contact me. ill be glad to help :)
donfanto1 7 months ago
how embarrassing you claim evolution doesn't claim where life began
every evolution book in the schools trys to explain this FAIL
itssaab 8 months ago
@itssaab Because it is tied together, yet it still falls under biogenesis. Fayul.
LCxCZ 8 months ago
@LCxCZ tied together??
do you realize what you are saying
if the principles which it is discovered are flawed you might want to reconsider everything
itssaab 8 months ago
@itssaab To be precise, Evolution is all about the way life has changed with time - the change from one form to another. Strictly speaking, therefore, theories of evolution (such as Natural Selection) do not offer any explanation for the origin of life. In natural science, "Abiogenesis" is the study of how biological life arises from inorganic matter through natural processes. Evolution by Natural Selection and Abiogenesis are similar only in that they offer explanations from nature alone.
mnc316 7 months ago
@mnc316 the second you claim it cannot explain life you belittle your theory down to contradictory theory
in evolution life must be complex to have the ability to evolve and must be simple from the beginning can you understand that
itssaab 6 months ago
Evolution is an observable fact. Natural selection is the theory part.
mnc316 8 months ago
@mnc316 evolution is not observable, you can't watch it taking place, you are misinformed. You can just look at the result of the things that clue to it, but you can't observe evolution taking place. Hence, this is why it is a scientific theory.
Deioproductions 8 months ago
@Deioproductions By "evolution", I meant the gradual change in forms over multiple generations. Archeologists infer evolution from the fossil record but evolution has also now been directly observed in the lab as well as the field. The word "theory" used in a *scientific* sense means there is a large, almost unassailable body of evidence to support the idea it applies to, such as the germ theory of disease or the theory of gravity. In this sense, Evolution by Natural Selection is a Theory.
mnc316 7 months ago
@mnc316 it's not an observable fact though, that is where you are wrong. you can't watch an organism literally evolving to have direct evidence, which is what you need for an observable fact.
Deioproductions 7 months ago
@Deioproductions You demand to see a fish sprout legs, right? Nobody is arguing that happened. I know it may be frightening, but you may need to learn a little more about evolutionary theory in order to try refute it.
To get you started, watch 0:50 to 1:00 over again.
hagenar 7 months ago
@hagenar Lol, I believe in evolution and I understand how it happened. The fact is that it is not observable, because no one can see something literally evolving in front of them. We can only pile mountains of evidence together that points to evolution. You just don't know what an observable fact is that was where I was trying to correct you.
Deioproductions 7 months ago
@Deioproductions That had been my first comment. I miscontrued yours. You have a very restrictive definition for the word 'observable'.
I should clarify for anyone reading these comments who may be confused by your statements. Using a conventional definition, evolution is indeed observable across generations. i.e., Scientists can see groups of organisms acquiring new traits, and passing them on, right in front of their eyes. Observable, in the classic definition of the word.
hagenar 7 months ago
@Deioproductions sorry to interfere but ur words really concern me. well the problem is when someone atually sees a ghost with his own eyes, feels the chill with his skin and feels unreasonable fear with whole his body, and then tell everybody what he saw, everybody will just laugh at him and will come up with THEIR ideas of how it was and what he saw(yeah i know its despicable), but when scientists are giving us the evolution crap, which they never observed and all their proof of it are quite
donfanto1 7 months ago
@Deioproductions fishy, we cant say a word to oppose to them because now we will get laughed at. where is the logyc? and btw for how long do u think humanity is breeding dogs? several thousands of years right? so what do u think did any dog turned into a more supreme being? nope :) did any of them got extra tail or wings? nope :) did any of them got stronger than a wolf? nope :) but they were breded in order to be stronger and better than wolves, so why after this many crossbreeds occurring
donfanto1 7 months ago
@Deioproductions we cant see any significant changes in them (if we wont count zillion different breeds of them)? why the dogs are still dogs? in fact with breeding humanity made selection breeding which would took nature like couple millions of years, because now dogs werent crossbreeding by chance, they were breed to got better, more superior offspring and still we see no evolution whatsoever. what scientists do is they barage us with their new "discoveries" and ideas about them
donfanto1 7 months ago
@Deioproductions what i and people like me do is giving people logical ideas which they can think over and come up with their own decisions and think what they want to think, not what other are telling them to. and if the evolution is true, then why in ur school textbooks all the "facts" about evolution, and biogenesis and other stuff are lies? (i put this other two disciplines in cuz they are theories that are built on top of each other)
donfanto1 7 months ago
@Deioproductions you actually can. This fact is behind many medical breakthroughs. We have manipulated bacteria through facilitated evolution as well as direct splicing of gene sequences. This has bee done for pure research and also for commercial profit. germs have evolved in response to our antibiotics. Insects have evolved to resist our pesticides. It is very much an observable fact.
Wanz33 7 months ago
@Deioproductions you actually can. This fact is behind many medical breakthroughs. We have manipulated bacteria through facilitated evolution as well as direct splicing of gene sequences. This has been done for pure research and also for commercial profit. germs have evolved in response to our antibiotics. Insects have evolved to resist our pesticides. It is very much an observable fact.
Wanz33 7 months ago
thanks...i have a debate on this topic today so it helps :)
100ammarrizvi 9 months ago
nice video. sure, evolution is real. do people _______ think it isn't? it's important to realize the amazing power of our choice in words. words make lots of difference.
fill in the blank: a. truly b. really c. actually 4. literally
the evolution of a cup of coffee is the purpose for my choice to embody on earth. for realz, yo.
the correct answer isn't provided.
mindnumber9 9 months ago
This... was amazing... so simple, to the point, and comprehensive.. THANK YOU! Hahah. About time someone made it this simple.
CRUSH3Rdlux 10 months ago
this video needs more exposure
3xxiled 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The narrator sounds somewhat like Tom Hanks, Good video!.
1Gabrielsson1 10 months ago
the Narrator sound somewhat like Tom Hanks, good video
1Gabrielsson1 10 months ago
true
TheDinohunter2000 10 months ago
Good video!
sanphaka04 1 year ago
Evidence for evolutionism. Appeal to authority arguments and hack on Christians. Evolutionism is dead. Why don't you get a new theory that doesn't include God. This time don't use my tax dollars to spread it.
EatTheRedOne 1 year ago
@EatTheRedOne Wow red, why don't you go eat some more bullshit so you can spew it out here?
darthjader08 1 year ago
@EatTheRedOne I'd prefer that my tax dollars be used to spread EDUCATION, rather than fictional tales...
darthjader08 1 year ago
@EatTheRedOne totally agree :)
xXsakkelaoXx 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx I'm totally against creationism being taught in schools also.
robvlob 10 months ago
@robvlob what are you talking about? schools should give both sides of the theories. Not just one :)
xXsakkelaoXx 9 months ago
@xXsakkelaoXx Sure & also teach all other mythologies & pseudo sciences along side these theories & also mislabel them theories. We can start by having astrology classes taught along side astronomy,numerology taught with science, blood letting, voodoo, faith healing, taught along side medical science, psyonics taught along side neurology.
Open the doors to pseudo sciences &/or mythologies like creation where will it end, how many creation stories are there that would have to be included?
robvlob 9 months ago
@xXsakkelaoXx the only problem is that one of the "theories" has no facts or evidence to support it, therefore it should not be taught in schools
JuiceBoxheero 9 months ago
@JuiceBoxheero Well actually you are right, evolution doesnt really have any facts to support it. :)
xXsakkelaoXx 9 months ago
@xXsakkelaoXx Aside from: Dna, fossils, repeateble tests and has already given us some things like: Improved medicine, better selective breeding, and even a system to improve products in computer programs with high speed natural selection.
And on your side: A realy old book...
mikstar890 9 months ago
@xXsakkelaoXx Also... you have seen the video that your commenting under right?
It gives a nice list of facts aswell.
mikstar890 9 months ago
@JuiceBoxheero There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny!
It is the backbone of Biology, accepted by all scientists.
gregrutz 9 months ago
@xXsakkelaoXx There is only one Theory that shows how Evolution happens. There is no other side.
gregrutz 9 months ago
@xXsakkelaoXx Creationism is not a theory, it is a stone age myth.
Huttate1 8 months ago
@Huttate1 Thats rather ironic as you based on your assumption of creation being a myth, you yourself believe we all came from a stone som billion years ago.
xXsakkelaoXx 8 months ago
@xXsakkelaoXx No assumption. There is the evidence of scientific discovery to refute the myth and no evidence to support it.
Also: I do not 'believe' anything. I 'think', based on the observations, reasoning and testing of countless scientists over the centuries.
Finally: the 'we came from a stone' rubbish is one of the creationist arguments based on total ignorance of the theory of evolution or a deliberate attempt to distort the facts to their own ends. Neither of which flatters them.
Huttate1 8 months ago
Comment removed
xXsakkelaoXx 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Huttate1 When and how did sex originate?
xXsakkelaoXx 8 months ago
@xXsakkelaoXx It originated when the cloud clown pulled out one of Adam's ribs. Caused a real storm when Vesalius proved that women and men have the same number of ribs in 1543.
The point is that I do not have to know how and when evolution took the two sex procreation step. I would love to know and look forward to any theories. It is these gaps in knowledge that rational people try to fill using science and the deranged glibly fill with their stone age myths.
Huttate1 8 months ago
com so be it? lol you base your facts on monkeys :D
xXsakkelaoXx 1 year ago
one argument for evolution? anyone?
xXsakkelaoXx 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx Didn't you watch the video?
gangsterper 1 year ago
@gangsterper its funny how he says that evolution is a fact and then 2 seconds later he says the theory of evolution. and me watching this video has nothing to do with my comment :P didnt you read the bible?!
xXsakkelaoXx 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx Is it not funny that you dont know the means of a scientific theory!! That you actually wrote that comment without trying to understand what a theory is by scientific terms! Fascinating!!
gangsterper 1 year ago
@gangsterper :D soooo if someone makes a youtube video and gave you arguments for creation and said it was a fact, does that make it so? science is something that has to have been observed, evolution isnt observed and has no arguments for it. THATS FUNNY
xXsakkelaoXx 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx Because what he speaks of in the video is known to anyone with an education... simple as that! If you want to learn about scientific method, how science works and has worked for a good period of time now, making you able to use computers, cellphones, enjoy advanced medicine etc... you can start by reading about scientific theory on wiki. Then maby about the theory of evolution. Stop making a fool out of yourself...
gangsterper 1 year ago
@gangsterper scientific method is about what is NOW (operation science),even you know that. evolution is history m8
xXsakkelaoXx 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx Scientific theory.... reeeeeead! If you choose to base your facts on articles from creationist . com so be it. Your lose
gangsterper 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx Evolution is history huh? so.....how do you suppose we'll survive the next 1000 yrs. without evolving to be more resistant to strains of bacteria? How do you suppose we'll survive the next 10,000 years without evolving to be able to adapt to extreme temperatures? How do you suppose we'll adapt to life on other planets....nay my delusional Parishee, Evolution is VERY MUCH necessary to our future, every bit as much as it's a part of history of life on earth.
darthjader08 1 year ago
@darthjader08 so your saying evolution can happen in less then 10 000 years. Actually your saying a 1000 years. Man your an idiot. Go study your own theory... And btw evolution is literally history its about how animals changed in the past. man your mind is poluted
xXsakkelaoXx 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx Well, if you're going to criticize someone (falsly) you should perhaps work on your punctuation (it's "you're an idiot", and it's spelled "polluted"). I'm guessing you didn't go look up any of those examples, did you. Micro evolution can occur in a very short period of time (within 2-3 generations), over hundreds of thousands of years many micro evolutionary changes can lead to a change in species, or even genus given enough time. The Spotted moth example, occurred ...cont'd.
darthjader08 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx ....cont'd....occurred over the course of less than a decade, BUT was only on largely noticeable levels after a full decade....and the change from a lighter, spotted colour....to darker, more black colours....then back to the lighter more spotted colour took place with the rise and fall of the Industrial revolution, so all in all, a little less than 200 years. The HIV Virus evolved over the course of less than a decade.
darthjader08 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx The Pine example (and I typo'd earlier, it was Lodgepole Pine, not Ponderosa Pine), took place over about 10,000 years, and it has been observed because ancient North American tribes documented cone shape, size, and composition, at which time the seeds were released shortly after hitting the ground, now however, the cones remain sealed, until they are exposed to intense heat (i.e. from a forest fire), which may seem detrimental, except that the seeds can remain viable for....cont'd
darthjader08 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx ...cont'd... that is, viable AND protected, for several hundred years, in fact there have been Lodgepole Pine cones found that were thousands of years old, that had been covered by sediment, and sealed away, only to be released, with the seeds still viable....this allows the Lodgepole Pine to be more productive. Now, every tree stand has a fire go through it every 3-200 years, it's a fact, depending on what type of tree stand, moisture content, etc. it's good for treestand..cont'd
darthjader08 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx ....cont'd...health, however, in the last 2 centuries, humans have created a problem: Excessive fire suppression, forest fires are essential to forest health, we used to put them out the moment they started (now we've taken on more of a control approach, rather than suppress), as a result, Lodgepole Pine did not reproduce as it normally would have, leading to less diverse woodstands...i.e. we fucked up evolution in that case....however, they are recovering....cont'd..
darthjader08 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx Yes, evolution IS history, however knowledge of that history is relevant to us because it is not limited to history, but is also essential to our future, continuance of our species, as well as millions of other diverse species on this planet (which we rely on to survive). The Galapagos Islands have hundreds of examples of observed evolution btw. On the contrary, I know what I'm talking about, you do not, I have a degree in Environmental Sciences, which automatically denotes.cont'd
darthjader08 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx ...cont'd...that I have more knowledge about the study of evolution than you EVER will. So, plz, stop being an idiot, and accept that it is a well documented and (although rarely, due to the extended period of time over which it takes place) OBSERVABLE FACT of life on this planet (and likely many others). To summarize: micro evolution can be witnessed in as little time as one generation to the next i.e. less than a decade, Macro evolution takes place over thousands of years.cont'd
darthjader08 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx ...cont'd...and is made up of MANY MANY instances of micro evolution. So get it straight FOOL. As for mental pollution: yah, I have a lot going on in this mind, sometimes I get absent minded as a result (such as using "observed" in place of "evolution", that doesn't make me wrong, it means I might make minor mistakes here and there. You on the other hand, have a very weak grasp of what Evolution is all about, and have been brainwashed to believe it's bullshit, THAT is polluted.
darthjader08 1 year ago
@darthjader08 micro evolution is within the kinds. yeah that happens. All dogs have one ancestor: a dog ;)
xXsakkelaoXx 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx I assume by "dog" you mean Canis Familiaris, yet their common ancestor is in Fact the wolf, otherwise known as Canis Lupus, being of a different species, Canis Familiaris cannot successfully breed with Canis Lupus, but oh, wait there are SOME Sub species of Canis Familiaris which CAN successfully breed with Canis Lupus. So what does this mean? That ALL dogs have a common ancestor (wolves), and that some sub species of dogs are more closely related to Wolves...cont'd
darthjader08 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx ....cont'd....which means your entire "theory" (colloquial usage) that Micro evolution cannot equate to Macro evolution with enough instances...just went out the window. Members of the same family (in this case Canidae) cannot reproduce, members of the same Genus, sometimes can, and members of the same species always can. I'm assuming by "kinds" you mean species, yet here you are, proven that "kinds" can change over time. Dude, go out and learn something about Evolution.
darthjader08 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx So, to summarize: Many instances of micro evolution translate to Macro evolution (a change in genus, family, order, class, phylum, and even Kingdom, given enough time) i.e., outside of "kinds". Your lack of understanding for the terminology ("kinds"? sounds like creationist bullshit to me) clearly illustrates you do not know enough about Science to really be able to say anything, as you clearly do not have much knowledge on the subject, and are just making personal assumptions.
darthjader08 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx As for witnessed examples of Macro Evolution, you show me someone who has lived 10,000 years or more, and I will show you someone who has witnessed it. Until then, you have no fucking right to ask, as fossil records are the only other potential evidence.
darthjader08 1 year ago
@darthjader08 you cant really prove anything with fossils, btw how do you tell the age of them? C14? other methods or do you look into wich rocklayer of time they are found in? btw a wolf and a dog is more or less the same thing.
xXsakkelaoXx 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx Wolf: Canis Lupus Domesticated dog: Canis Familiaris. Same Genus, different species. Typically interspecies breeding is NOT possible, however (with a low success rate) Lupus and Familiaris can interbreed. Very clear evidence that domestic dogs evolved from wolves.
There are over 20 different methods of dating fossils (or anything organic) , none of which can be considered accurate on their own, but used in conjunction, VERY accurate.
darthjader08 1 year ago
@darthjader08 Actualy house dogs are devolved, they were mated to get the kinder gentler trait. U see. Which is why they do not have dominant colors. Wolves have bigger brains, a bigger smell receptors. They also can survive by themselves, unlike housedogs. Chi waa waaa, and smaller dogs are even dumber, since they were mated for cuteness.,and which is why they have have tumors and such.
Dudex58 10 months ago
@Dudex58 There's no such thing as de-evolution. Your understanding of it is incorrect, what you're referring to is fitness for survival, which has been bred out of the species. This is, in fact, still evolution, through manipulation, i.e. selective breeding. You're also incorrect in the statment "they do not have dominant colours", ALL pure bred dogs have dominant colours, the ones that don't are a result of a mix of species, which makes complete sense. Jack Russels, Border Collies...cont'd...
darthjader08 10 months ago
@Dudex58 ...cont'd...and a number of other species are all as intelligent as wolves, which is comparative to the intelligence of a toddler (shit, one of my Jack Russels figured out how to turn off my alarm clock, entirely on her own, I sincerely doubt a domesticated wolf would be able to exhibit greater intelligence). Wolves do have a bigger Cerebrum, which is what gives them an improved sense of smell, not "bigger smell receptors" as you put it....cont'd...
darthjader08 10 months ago
@Dudex58 ...cont'd....WTF are you talking about??? There have been NUMEROUS documented cases of domesticated dogs surviving on their own, both in the wild and in urban areas. My own Jack Russel survived entirely on her own for 3 months, after running away from her previous owner (she came back eventually...something about uncontrollable loyalty I figure, but then that's how she met me and was given a better life), and she kept herself in perfect health. The "de-evolution" you refer to...cont'd..
darthjader08 10 months ago
@Dudex58 ...cont'd...is a result of thousands of years of inbreeding...and not needing to rely on a higher sense of smell. I've met some very intelligent Chi wa waa's (I hate them too), but due to their stature (and in case you haven't noticed, they have large brains for their size, compared to other breeds) they are insecure, and rarely exhibit their intelligence. Again, "tumours and such" are a result of inbreeding, not de-evolution.
darthjader08 10 months ago
@darthjader08 yea I hate chi wa waas, to me they should be classified as rodents, like squirrels.lol
Dudex58 10 months ago
@Dudex58 Ur right about there not being a category known as deevolution, but I needed something to word it. I was out of word pallets. Like u said they manipulated breeding for the kinder, gentler, lighter colored animals. In the animal kingdom though they mate for survival and fitness. Which is why house dogs are lower animals, because they have weak traits. Unless breeded for strength and so on. But most people just want cuteness, and kind dogs =dumb gullible dogs.
Dudex58 10 months ago
@Dudex58 Jack russels, Boxers, Mastiffs, Doberman's, Pit Bulls, etc. are all breeds that can be quite vicious (shit, I once saw my 18lb Jack Russel tear up a very vicious Boxer nearly 10x her size, and other than shaking uncontrollably afterwards, she walked away, unscathed, covered in his blood, the owner, who had let him loose on me - because she peed on his lawn - threatened to call animal control, I pointed out that they wouldn't believe that an 18lb dog on a leash would not...cont'd...
darthjader08 10 months ago
@darthjader08 Did say unless mated for else wise. Notice most of these dogs R sorta illegal 2 have. They bite kids & R very wild. Proved my point. Notice how they R ugly & the better hunters. Wolves still beat the shit out of them.lol Jack Russels? Frasier Dog as I call it. Although it is smartt it does suffer from sickness as well & couldn't survive in the wild. All these dogs lost a certain trait from human interceding with their mating. Which is why natural wolves as specimen rain supreme.
Dudex58 10 months ago
@Dudex58 cont'd...no more or less aesthetically pleasing than other breeds. The only potential health risks with Jack Russels, is Hip displacia (sp?), but it is rare, and as long as you're careful about breeding, it won't show up. Like I said, mine survived 3 months perfectly fine, and was intelligent enough she probably could have survived her entire life in the wild. Wolves don't reign supreme, other canines are more successful than wolves...but as pack hunters, in larger numbers.
darthjader08 10 months ago
@Dudex58 ...cont'd...attack a large vicious dog under normal circumstances, and would likely side with me).
lol, yah, they are kinda like rodents with more personality (even my ferret, which is not a rodent, but a mustelid, had less personality than most Chi wa waa's), but they are different family, genus, and species...
You know what determines a rodent, right? It's actually kind of ridiculous that something so minor would determine the family name....but it does.
darthjader08 10 months ago
@darthjader08 I kinda forgot why rodents and dogs are difered, but please elaborate. I would say the tail and feet, and the ability to mass produce and carry viruses. I wouldn't say size because I seen rats bigger than chi wa waas/ But thats just a guess.
Dudex58 10 months ago
@Dudex58 I don't have time to comment on everything, but I'll say this and get to the rest later. It's the teeth, rodentia are the ONLY mammals whose teeth are constantly growing, and they have to wear them down or they will grow too long and they will die. that's the ONLY thing that defines rodents as rodents.
darthjader08 10 months ago
@darthjader08 or rather, differentiates between family Rodentia, and...say Mustelidae.
Those breeds have a tendency to be more vicious than other breeds (that was what we were discussing, was it not? being tough?), so of course they're more likely to bite. Having said that, raised properly, they are no more dangerous than other breeds (unless you attack their owner). Most of those breeds aren't so ugly, they're more muscular and not as sleek as other breeds, but otherwise they're...cont'd...
darthjader08 10 months ago
@xXsakkelaoXx I disagree, fossils provide PRETTY CLEAR EMPIRICAL, ARCHIVAL EVIDENCE of evolution.
darthjader08 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xXsakkelaoXx "btw how do you tell the age of them? C14? other methods or do you look into wich rocklayer of time they are found in?" The last two, primarily. C14 is not reliable beyond 60,000 years so it is excluded in general consideration.
The rock layer, and the ages of both surrounding layers and fossils, are used for relative comparison. However generally the most reliable method of absolute dating is cross-analysis between multi-radiation isotopes of the layers and (rarely) bones.
onijester56 1 year ago
(cont)
And wolves are a different species than dogs. Which means that they are NOT "more or less the same thing".
Of course even if they WERE, that would be evidence FOR evolution in that they are "the same thing" yet have such a wide variety of differences between them. They would then undeniably share a common ancestor, as Evolution predicts.
(FYI, the fossil record connects the common ancestor with the rest of the animal kingdom.)
You lose either way.
onijester56 1 year ago
@onijester56 Uhhhh....different species, same genus, and they are capable of inter breeding (which technically makes them different sub species, not different species), so yes, they are more or less the same thing.
Yes, he does lose either way, lol....
darthjader08 10 months ago
@xXsakkelaoXx WTF are you talking about???? There are MANY MANY observed cases of observation, I can think of 3, right now, off the top of my head: Spotted Moth in Europe in the 19th century, Ponderosa Pine Cones, HIV/Aids virus. Look them up.
darthjader08 1 year ago
@darthjader08 none of them are observed cases of observation (whatever the **** that is)
xXsakkelaoXx 1 year ago
@xXsakkelaoXx Observed cases of evolution dumbass, it's called a typo, and they all are.
darthjader08 1 year ago
Wasn't it Hitler who said if you tell a lie loud enough and long enough people will believe it? Stating that something is fact does not make it so. "Observable phenomenon" ? You've got to be kidding.
EatTheRedOne 1 year ago
@EatTheRedOne You do know that the lie of christianity has been yelled out 4 allmost 2000 years...
gangsterper 1 year ago
Why did you use the word "facts" in your reply? What are your "facts"? Appeal to authority arguments? Fancy terms?
EatTheRedOne 1 year ago
@EatTheRedOne Evolution is a fact. It's confirmed as an observable phenomenon. It's just that scientists call it a "Scientific Theory" because the word "Scientific Fact" is already used to describe a single proven hypothesis, while a theory is an embodiment of all the facts. Regardless of terminology, the meaning is the same.
VideoHunter13 1 year ago
First off, I doubt you could find 1000 priests that believe in God. Second off... If evolutionism is true, why don't you just shut up? If you're so convinced your theories are true, then go find something better to do with your time. Since there's no consequence for your actions because there is no God, maybe you could knock off a 7/11 tonight. Look at all the stuff Hitler did because he believed in evolutionism. Maybe you could get some ideas from him. Maybe you could plan a world dictatorship.
EatTheRedOne 1 year ago
@EatTheRedOne Not believing in God does not mean a lack of morality. Also, we correct and educate people about evolution because we don't want people not knowing the facts and spreading them to others.
VideoHunter13 1 year ago
youre fucking stupid allah is real he breathes plague and hellfire on you heathens have fun burning in eternal hell
seajist 1 year ago
@seajist Yes, that will be fun. Hanging out with all the scientists and musicians and other "evil sinners". You pedohile muslims can have your "fun up in Heaven with those 72 virgins"...that's not very appealing to normal, intelligent people anyway:)
winterstellar 1 year ago
@seajist Why would anyone believe you if your cursing, defying your own religion. Aren't you going to hell too then. How can you escape your impending judgement?
iswear12345 1 year ago
@iswear12345 rofl you have a little penis so as far as i am concerned you arent even part of humanity so idk why i am talking to you allah have mercy infidel
seajist 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@seajist You never even answered my question. If you have no defense for what you believe then why do believe it in the first place. Please give my one reason why I should believe in allah or the quran.
iswear12345 1 year ago
Sheesh. This idiot thinks a theory is the same as a law of science. Go figure, he believes in ideas formed in a day when people rode horses and used candles for light.
NephilimFree 1 year ago
@NephilimFree Wow you're stupid. A THEORY in scientific terms is NOT the same thing as a theory in every day language. Also, what difference does it make if it was thought of when people rode horses and used candles to read. By that logic, why dont we get rid of EVERYTHING that was thought of from that time period i.e. the Theory of Gravity, Religion, Crop Cultivation, the Constitution, Democracy, etc. Yeah lets get rid of all of those because they were created at a time where people rode horses
lefayad1991 1 year ago
@Nephilimfreeidiot
In everyday language a theory means speculation. Not in science. A scientific theory is based on evidence and facts and not on speculation.
nephilimfail1 1 year ago
@nephilimfail1 If you believe that you completely lack an understanding of science. Theories are hypothesis, and the formation of evey hypothesis is an assumption or observation. Unfortunately for evos, evolution was an idea born by men seeking a way to deny the creator in an era when people rode horses and used candles for light. Modern science has demonstated countles time and in every way that it is not nor ever was scientific.
NephilimFree 1 year ago
@NephilimFree theories are tested hypothesis, you are prtly right though the formation of a hypothesis is based on observation
therefore your flood/lunar speculation is not even an hypothesis as you did not even observe the moon yourself, you do not do any maths and misunderstand physics
unfortunateely for the creatards religion was born out of the inability to explain things
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@NephilimFree "If you believe that you completely lack an understanding of science." This statement comes from a man with no understanding of science, so you will not find people taking it seriously.
"Theories are hypothesis (sic)". No, theories are not hypotheses.
Theories are COMPRISED of facts. They attempt to EXPLAIN the facts. The better theories explain the facts more thoroughly. Do you know so little that you have not even figured this out? Apparently, the answer is yes.
AlanCFA 1 year ago
@NephilimFree "Unfortunately for evos, evolution was an idea born by men seeking a way to deny the creator". Absolute bullshit.
"in an era when people rode horses and used candles for light" Coming from someone who thinks a bronze age book written by nomadic herdsman is the word of a supernatural ghost, this is especially ironic.
" Modern science has demonstated countles time and in every way that it is not nor ever was scientific." The TOE is a part of modern science, you ignoramus.
AlanCFA 1 year ago
@NF "Modern science has demonstated countles time and in every way that it is not...scientific."
Todd Wood, Phd (biochem), YEC and director of the Center for Origins Rsch @Bryan college: "Evolution is not a theory in crisis, it has not failed as a scientific explanation. There is evidence for evolution, gobs and gobs of it. It is not just speculation or a faith choice or an assumption or a religion. There is no conspiracy to hide the truth about the failure of evolution"
But what does he know?
AlanCFA 1 year ago
@NephilimFree In science a law is less than a theory, a theory explains things a law does no such thing
BTW the time use the come up with a theory does in no way reflect on it's use, besides the TOE was not formed in a day, only a "bog boy" like you would think that
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@NephilimFree That's extremely ironic and hilarious coming from a man who believes the bible that was written by man over 2000 years ago is the word of God. Not to mention a literal 6 day creation and is a geo centrist. Just fade away from youtube alright. You have been utterly destroyed by countless people on here. Get some mental help in all seriousness.
slickwick45 1 year ago
If you aren't going to show me where I'm wrong and just make blanket statements, this conversation is a mere gathering of fools and I will have no part in a fruitless conversation. When you wake up to reality, it will blow your mind and you will fall to your knees and worship God with all your heart. That is my prayer for you and everyone reading this. ...God, they know not what they do. Forgive them I pray. Amen!
jesusfreak2017 1 year ago