@rich187113 One giant leap for man kind, one small step for man-kind.Or One small step for man, one giant leap for man-kind. Either way, what is important is that he is refering to us humans as man. And he is also refering to some other race non-human, as man-kind. Perhaps the Nefilim or their offspring while mating with humans, that created the so called giants. Men of renown. What the heck is up with that? Man-kind. As in kinda like a man but not quite right.
@Garveergor or frogs are highly developed and build super rockets from there swamps to go to moon every day and there already on mars building new frog population
@islandbuoy4 I would dearly love to know what the lunatic fringe has against Masons. If people want to have secret handshakes and get together once in a while like that Ray Stevens song, that is their business. Next thing the fringers will yap about is how some people spend their Saturday mornings... in temple.
Yes, America captured and put to use the human spoils of war it captured in WWII. This does not give them authority over the astronauts, whose chain of command did not include Nazis.
"Who is going to debunk this?" Seriously? That's silly. It's a catadioptrism (also called "ghosting"). I'm an old video pro. One advantage is--I've used old analog equipment. A catadioptrism is caused by bright light that ricochets off the interior of a lens housing to the opposite corner. Do this: frame-by-frame, draw a line from the "frog" to the bright spot on the upper-left corner of Aldrin's helmet. You will notice that each time the line crosses the exact center of the screen. DEBUNKED.
"Who is going to debunk this? No one has yet. Because there's nothing to debunk here. The at little white dot jumping, is the frog." HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH WHOS IS GOING TO DEBUNK THIS???? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH omg this is freaking awesome. I mean the shear ignorance is staggering. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Colossal FAIL, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
I just about died laughing while watching this. I cant believe the hoax advocates accused nasa of staging an elaborate hoax in area 51 im guessing, went through all this trouble, sent astronauts into orbit, only to release footage of a glowing frog. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Its obviously a reflection associated with lense flare. You people thought it was a frog???? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, It DOESNT GET ANY BETTER THAN THAT. OH MAN!! Great stuff guys, keep up the good work, we need a good laugh
@llTungstenII Yeah, they always say this was faked in the high Nevada desert or on a sound stage. Maybe the poster of this video could tell us why there would be a frog in *either* of those settings. BTW, isn't this the same thing that lady in Australia said was a bouncing Coke bottle, thrown or kicked across the set?
For those who don't know, the thing is an internal reflection of bright surfaces. Note how it moves exactly opposite from the astronaut. So this is un-debunkable, huh?
As a videographer (old enough to use this kind of analog equipment), I can tell you this is not a frog, a rat or a coke bottle. It's a CATADIOPTRISM. Catadiioptrism is a strange reflection created by very bright objects reflecting on the sides of a lens. If you noticed the action of the "frog," draw a line from it to the very bright portion of Aldrin's visor. That line goes exactly across the very center of the screen. Go frame by frame and it does the same throughout. Classic, clear example.
ofcourse they didnt go to the moon man, they cant even leave the earths electromagnetic field NOW, there just WAAYYY too much radiation out there for any living thing to survive, lol
"One small hop for frogkind...." Think of all that money wasted on huge rockets when frogs have been able to jump from the Earth to the moon all this time. The obvious thing to do next is to lasso a couple of kangaroos and jump to Mars. The Woomera launch site seems appropriate. Aussie kangonauts would be cool.
The "frog", also known as the "coke bottle", is obviously nothing more or less than a lens flare moving in perfect unison with the brightly lit astronaut, whose suit is so bright it actually causes double images of itself at spots. As far as radiation goes, a cat scan is much worse than anything the astronauts took.
This kind of videos are laughable, not a shred of seriousness in it at all. So i conclude this is just someones failed attempt to make something. Thank you.
The extreme temperature changes only occur on the surface of the moon. Since there's no atmosphere you don't notice the extreme temperatures above the surface. Furthermore a moon day lasts one month. The astronauts reached and left the moon during the moon morning when the temperatures weren't suchlike high. Last but not least the radiation wasn't as high as you might expect and the camera was special construction that prevents a contact between the film and the metallic parts of the camera.
funny thing is no one mentions the fact that's this so called frong is like GLOWING BRIGHT WHITE??? maybe it's on fire and jumping for it's life? and I really don't know about you but if I saw a glowing frog hopping around I would try to catch it since it wouldn't be alive for to much longer seeing that's it's hopping for it's life.
some body some where will prove all these debunkers wrong by showing that the 'left overs' are still on the moon, then what will you have to say?
The hard thing isn't to prove to the world that these idiots are wrong, anyone can do that, its convincing THEM that they are wrong thats impossible! Convincing them to admit that they dont have any solid facts of science to go on. People beleive what they want to believe, especially when they don't have much else going on in their heads.
OMG So taxpayers in USA payed the movie makers 100 million a second for this bullshit footage.that looks like a regurgitated african buffallo turd. If i was in america id shit on NASA so hard it wont be funny
Only brain dead losers believe this was faked. You have to have failed every science class since the third grade to buy into the conspiracy bull shit.
Every single moronic statement by conspiracy theorists have been answered with scientific fact, still you draw backs refuse to accept fact and instead replace it with your alternative reality. Must be nice to be oblivious... I cant afford that luxury! Check your sources buddy before your brain turns to complete mush!
Have the moon hoaxers ever heard of Isaac Newton? By their logic, especially "no air to push against" guy, as soon as the space shuttle reaches thirty miles up where there is virtually no air, it no longer has anything to push against? what does it do, fall back? Where in the heck do you think GPS comes from?
Awkward movement for a frog. Especially considering the fact that it appears to be in front of the astronaut as well as behind, AND the same goes for that white pole next to the flag.
Well I must admit that this white pole is really weird and it even seems to appear and dissapear, really awkward. But the frog, I insist, is there. Thanks for the comment.
Are you an expert on how the data from the camera is prosessed & transmitted? With such transmissions, data was broken down into small blocks according to position in the frame, brightness etc. The blocks were transmitted via a low gain antenna that had to be received, decoded, amplified etc before rebroadcasting. All this slow sequencing produced ghostly images. Later transmissions from Apollo were via a higher gain antenna that cut down such problems.
The main reason why the BRIGHT pole etc remain in view when the astronaut is in front of it is because the camera video chip was slow reacting to the changing brightness of each part of the image. Something that is bright 'burns' into the chip and takes a while to adjust allowing the astronaut to pass infront but can still see the pole. No mystery here at all. Dark parts of the pic are no affected, just the bright sections. Combined with slow processing makes ghosty images.
You do realize that this was shot on a kinescope? That is, they took a TV camera and focused it on a small vidoe moniter of the broadcast. Also, this footage is who knows how many genrations old. And is from about 250,000 miles away. Your 'frog' is nothing more then the errors one would expect in such a situation.
Look, there's another thing, from the Moon how are you supposed to take off if there's no atmosphere, the rockets have nothing to push against! There's the vacuum there, no propulsion can be made unless something like antigravity or some other thing...
Rockets don't quite work like you think they do. If they did, every single satellite in orbit would have to be a hoax. Since they most certainly do exist, you can watch pass overs, and with a powerful enough telescope see details like the solar panels on the ISS, and you can use GPS and Satellite TV, they must exist. After all, the last stage of thrust is in a vacuum for any satellite, a vacuum just as strong as on the moon. Therefore, something must be wrong with your idea of how rockets work.
No man has ever gotten further than several hundred miles out {from Mother Earth}. The Magnetosphere is the shield, therefor as logic would dictate: it shields us. Compared with the outer space that lies beyond it: the magnetosphere is easy. The stars from space must be brilliant, given the fact that no cloudy Earthen atmosphere blurs them. The great music of the 1960's were T.V. themes.
Yes, I agree. Thanks for the comment. Well, seeing that you have knowledge about it...do you know the difference between the mangnetosphere and the Van Hallen radiation belts?
The Van Allen Radiation Belts are contained within, what's referred to as, the magnetosphere. The purpose of these protective layers is to trap and filter cosmic matter, x-rays, the solar winds and so forth. It's the buffer between us and inhospitable outer space. Before Man can become an interplanetary voyager he must construct space craft that can truly protect him from penetrative forces. No human can knock about the cosmos in a thin-skinned lunar module.
Wow,..ok procommenter...thank you very much. Now I have it really clear.
We'd better take care of this planet, cause we haven't made those space crafts yet! This Apollo hoax has been much more harmful than many people think. That sentence of "he who controls the Moon controls the Earth" is very truth. So it is very important that the masses know that, otherwise they are living in a Walt Disney World! Big hug,
Cancer's a metabolic disease. No metabolic disease can be cured thru mechanical measures. Trophoblast (healing cells) & cancer cells are one-and-the-same. Amygdalin {found in the seeds of 1,400 fruits} is the body's defense against & control for these left-over/errant cells. My wife grew up in Saigon during the war. She can recall 1 neighbor, out of 100's, coming down w/cancer. The Vietnamese eat bamboo daily. It's rich in Amygdalin (vitamin B17). {See: "A World Without Cancer"}
Man, is like you have read my mind. I was wondering if it was B70 or B17, cause these days I had been thinking about that. Now that we all have to get ready to become self sufficient, if we can, even with the electricity, all this information becomes crucial for our survival. Thanks again procommenter, I'll send you a friends request, so we can keep in touch!
Watch G. Edward Griffin's film: "A World Without Cancer" on You-Tube. I have anecdotal evidence from within my family that vitamin B17 {a.k.a. Amygdalin} is the control for malignant cells.
What he isn't telling you is that the magnetosphere only traps particle radiation, which is easily stopped by a few centimeters aluminum. I am not saying I would want to stay in their for a long time, but the astronauts only spent about an hour total. The soviets and other countries tracked the craft on radar, they knew how long the transit was, the know it was real, despite it being in their best interests to declare a fake.
Armstrong's brain told him to jump like a frog, because he had just seen one. Go back to kinder garden. And yes you can hop around without raising dust but don't ask me how, ask Kubrick.
Okasy, you morons. Did you notice that he was not raising a dust cloud hopping around on what was obviously a powdery surface? Can you do that other than in a vacuum? HELL NO!. Grow a brain, will ya?
A micro meteorite?? I don't think so, and I'm 43...And either the producers didn't even see it , at first, or they thought it was not that obvious at that time.
the moon landings were NOT a hoax, i, a 13-year-old can tell you that that "frog" is a micro medeorite. Besides, if there was a frog on the set dont you think that the "producers"
would have re-filmed the scene without the "frogs"?
Hahah, I think I understand what you mean. This research was done by a website called Coppernicus II. I just made a video, to show that frog jumping around...(that little white dot that is pointed). Thanks for the comment. I like your channel too!
There are no blast craters beneath any of the lunar modules. Shadows don't run parallel in the Apollo films. Armstrong took focused photos with a chest-mounted camera. The lunar module's climate controls were battery-operated. Astronauts are brightly lit while in shadow. Moonscapes for different missions, miles apart, are exactly the same. These are incontrovertible facts. Make of them what you will.
Hey, procommenter, you moron learn something about cameras. He used a Hasselblad single-lens reflex camera. The viewfinder in on the TOP of the camera, and is about two inches by two inches. You conspiratoids sure don't bother to investigate stuff very well. No wonder we have people who think missiles can bnlow airplane-shaped holes in things.
They will probably make some idiotic excuse like, they jumped onto the rocket before it left... Even look at the guy jumping. This is so stupid if they want you to believe "this is the moon"
Exactly! I think that somehow subconsciously Mr. Aldrin was jumping like a frog because he was seeing them! So he was predicting that sooner or later the world would realize this huge hoax! Now I see that we agree. Indeed, this is Texas, not the Moon. Cheers!
They probably came up with the "one giant leap" while filming this part. Joking about the giant leap of faith that mankind has made.
TheElitePowerThatBe 6 months ago
Have anybody ever wondered why the background is visible behind the astronaut? Like he was transparent
adam10603 8 months ago
@rich187113 One giant leap for man kind, one small step for man-kind.Or One small step for man, one giant leap for man-kind. Either way, what is important is that he is refering to us humans as man. And he is also refering to some other race non-human, as man-kind. Perhaps the Nefilim or their offspring while mating with humans, that created the so called giants. Men of renown. What the heck is up with that? Man-kind. As in kinda like a man but not quite right.
pkrska 10 months ago
Welcome our Lunar Frog Overlords!
dabigq 1 year ago
@Garveergor or frogs are highly developed and build super rockets from there swamps to go to moon every day and there already on mars building new frog population
nickeyx2 1 year ago
one thing the NASA NAZIs cannot hide is the fact they had real NAZIs and Freemasons on their payroll.
islandbuoy4 1 year ago
@islandbuoy4 whos going to debunk that?
TheManfromNibiru 1 year ago
@islandbuoy4 I would dearly love to know what the lunatic fringe has against Masons. If people want to have secret handshakes and get together once in a while like that Ray Stevens song, that is their business. Next thing the fringers will yap about is how some people spend their Saturday mornings... in temple.
Yes, America captured and put to use the human spoils of war it captured in WWII. This does not give them authority over the astronauts, whose chain of command did not include Nazis.
Pygar2 1 year ago
34 seconds and 35 seconds u can see the wire above his head clear as day
thegreatterror 1 year ago
@thegreatterror I see overcompression artifact, followed by a quick glimpse of the radio antenna on top of the PLSS.
Pygar2 1 year ago
"Who is going to debunk this?" Seriously? That's silly. It's a catadioptrism (also called "ghosting"). I'm an old video pro. One advantage is--I've used old analog equipment. A catadioptrism is caused by bright light that ricochets off the interior of a lens housing to the opposite corner. Do this: frame-by-frame, draw a line from the "frog" to the bright spot on the upper-left corner of Aldrin's helmet. You will notice that each time the line crosses the exact center of the screen. DEBUNKED.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
I went to the moon ones to see what the fuss was about ,what a hell hole ,i should have gone the a desert instead.
FrankaDith 1 year ago
LOL priceless
Nasa Nazi Fairy Tales
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
when observing today's space programs in the USA,how difficult and dangerous it is,you know,that back then,it was"MISSION-IMPOSSIBLE"...come on!!!!!
aligoulou 1 year ago
@Garveergor Pssshhh...don't be silly. Frogs can't live on the moon. This is obviously a little moon critter.
Astrobrant2 1 year ago
"Who is going to debunk this? No one has yet. Because there's nothing to debunk here. The at little white dot jumping, is the frog." HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH WHOS IS GOING TO DEBUNK THIS???? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH omg this is freaking awesome. I mean the shear ignorance is staggering. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Colossal FAIL, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
llTungstenII 1 year ago
I just about died laughing while watching this. I cant believe the hoax advocates accused nasa of staging an elaborate hoax in area 51 im guessing, went through all this trouble, sent astronauts into orbit, only to release footage of a glowing frog. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Its obviously a reflection associated with lense flare. You people thought it was a frog???? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, It DOESNT GET ANY BETTER THAN THAT. OH MAN!! Great stuff guys, keep up the good work, we need a good laugh
llTungstenII 1 year ago
@llTungstenII Yeah, they always say this was faked in the high Nevada desert or on a sound stage. Maybe the poster of this video could tell us why there would be a frog in *either* of those settings. BTW, isn't this the same thing that lady in Australia said was a bouncing Coke bottle, thrown or kicked across the set?
For those who don't know, the thing is an internal reflection of bright surfaces. Note how it moves exactly opposite from the astronaut. So this is un-debunkable, huh?
Astrobrant2 1 year ago
that's 1 small leap for Kermit 1 giant leap for frog kind
ccc771 1 year ago
As a videographer (old enough to use this kind of analog equipment), I can tell you this is not a frog, a rat or a coke bottle. It's a CATADIOPTRISM. Catadiioptrism is a strange reflection created by very bright objects reflecting on the sides of a lens. If you noticed the action of the "frog," draw a line from it to the very bright portion of Aldrin's visor. That line goes exactly across the very center of the screen. Go frame by frame and it does the same throughout. Classic, clear example.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@2bpilot
are you just an idiot?
or
or a tax paying patri-idiiot?
islandbuoy4 1 year ago
ofcourse they didnt go to the moon man, they cant even leave the earths electromagnetic field NOW, there just WAAYYY too much radiation out there for any living thing to survive, lol
dontdoitnow 1 year ago
FAKE IT NASA
nasafakedit 1 year ago
LOLOLOLLLLLLLLL
Fracture55 1 year ago
"One small hop for frogkind...." Think of all that money wasted on huge rockets when frogs have been able to jump from the Earth to the moon all this time. The obvious thing to do next is to lasso a couple of kangaroos and jump to Mars. The Woomera launch site seems appropriate. Aussie kangonauts would be cool.
kaferere 2 years ago
Comment removed
kaferere 2 years ago
The "frog", also known as the "coke bottle", is obviously nothing more or less than a lens flare moving in perfect unison with the brightly lit astronaut, whose suit is so bright it actually causes double images of itself at spots. As far as radiation goes, a cat scan is much worse than anything the astronauts took.
Pygar2 2 years ago
Deny all you want, I'm personally preparing to face the moon frog foe when they inevitably arrive.
preachingsin 1 year ago
Comment removed
islandbuoy4 1 year ago
this video has been put out by NASA to discredit the conspirsy gang, but i like it!!!!!!!!
kris090765 2 years ago
This kind of videos are laughable, not a shred of seriousness in it at all. So i conclude this is just someones failed attempt to make something. Thank you.
BillieJay88 2 years ago
The extreme temperature changes only occur on the surface of the moon. Since there's no atmosphere you don't notice the extreme temperatures above the surface. Furthermore a moon day lasts one month. The astronauts reached and left the moon during the moon morning when the temperatures weren't suchlike high. Last but not least the radiation wasn't as high as you might expect and the camera was special construction that prevents a contact between the film and the metallic parts of the camera.
sverebom 2 years ago
How could the film in the camera's withstand such extreme temperature changes and radiation?
xtcongo 2 years ago
funny thing is no one mentions the fact that's this so called frong is like GLOWING BRIGHT WHITE??? maybe it's on fire and jumping for it's life? and I really don't know about you but if I saw a glowing frog hopping around I would try to catch it since it wouldn't be alive for to much longer seeing that's it's hopping for it's life.
some body some where will prove all these debunkers wrong by showing that the 'left overs' are still on the moon, then what will you have to say?
HoshiChun 2 years ago
The hard thing isn't to prove to the world that these idiots are wrong, anyone can do that, its convincing THEM that they are wrong thats impossible! Convincing them to admit that they dont have any solid facts of science to go on. People beleive what they want to believe, especially when they don't have much else going on in their heads.
mattmit 2 years ago
OMG So taxpayers in USA payed the movie makers 100 million a second for this bullshit footage.that looks like a regurgitated african buffallo turd. If i was in america id shit on NASA so hard it wont be funny
hurricanewinzz 2 years ago
Moon Hoaxasy: Wire Tales.
Analysis of the evidence against the race to the moon: The photographer and his fortune in lies.
watch?v=PMxvw6-4PWE
jcgmed 2 years ago
Only brain dead losers believe this was faked. You have to have failed every science class since the third grade to buy into the conspiracy bull shit.
fundiebasher 3 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAH!
philliefanatic266 2 years ago
There were no planes on 911.
And here goes a preemptive "fuck you".
Nine11Twelve 2 years ago
Oh let me guess. It was a "phaanntoooom plaaaanneee" WOoOoOoO! Scaarryy. lol
Abengoshis 2 years ago
Yes, planes weren't invented until 2004
soakupthesunman 2 years ago
The only moon Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong ever went to, was a honeymoon!
user17v 3 years ago
Yea, well proving that=failure!
Every single moronic statement by conspiracy theorists have been answered with scientific fact, still you draw backs refuse to accept fact and instead replace it with your alternative reality. Must be nice to be oblivious... I cant afford that luxury! Check your sources buddy before your brain turns to complete mush!
guitarplayer4real 3 years ago 3
Moon hoaxers all have the same dead eyes
barflewk 2 years ago
Have the moon hoaxers ever heard of Isaac Newton? By their logic, especially "no air to push against" guy, as soon as the space shuttle reaches thirty miles up where there is virtually no air, it no longer has anything to push against? what does it do, fall back? Where in the heck do you think GPS comes from?
charliegoodboy 3 years ago
Ha Ha ha, I Like The Ending, By The Way That Is Real Film Fotage, And Don't Try And Scare People, It Is Just Boraring
princeofdarkness66 3 years ago
Ok, thanks
Artifalia 3 years ago
lol, I thought they made this in the 2001 space odissey studios... stanley kubricks film. But funny...
Kernchen013 3 years ago
hahaha
Artifalia 3 years ago
Awkward movement for a frog. Especially considering the fact that it appears to be in front of the astronaut as well as behind, AND the same goes for that white pole next to the flag.
nakenmil 3 years ago
Well I must admit that this white pole is really weird and it even seems to appear and dissapear, really awkward. But the frog, I insist, is there. Thanks for the comment.
Artifalia 3 years ago
Are you an expert on how the data from the camera is prosessed & transmitted? With such transmissions, data was broken down into small blocks according to position in the frame, brightness etc. The blocks were transmitted via a low gain antenna that had to be received, decoded, amplified etc before rebroadcasting. All this slow sequencing produced ghostly images. Later transmissions from Apollo were via a higher gain antenna that cut down such problems.
astroroadshow 3 years ago
The main reason why the BRIGHT pole etc remain in view when the astronaut is in front of it is because the camera video chip was slow reacting to the changing brightness of each part of the image. Something that is bright 'burns' into the chip and takes a while to adjust allowing the astronaut to pass infront but can still see the pole. No mystery here at all. Dark parts of the pic are no affected, just the bright sections. Combined with slow processing makes ghosty images.
astroroadshow 3 years ago 2
hahahaha
Artifalia 3 years ago
You do realize that this was shot on a kinescope? That is, they took a TV camera and focused it on a small vidoe moniter of the broadcast. Also, this footage is who knows how many genrations old. And is from about 250,000 miles away. Your 'frog' is nothing more then the errors one would expect in such a situation.
loperspest 3 years ago
Look, there's another thing, from the Moon how are you supposed to take off if there's no atmosphere, the rockets have nothing to push against! There's the vacuum there, no propulsion can be made unless something like antigravity or some other thing...
Artifalia 3 years ago
Rockets don't quite work like you think they do. If they did, every single satellite in orbit would have to be a hoax. Since they most certainly do exist, you can watch pass overs, and with a powerful enough telescope see details like the solar panels on the ISS, and you can use GPS and Satellite TV, they must exist. After all, the last stage of thrust is in a vacuum for any satellite, a vacuum just as strong as on the moon. Therefore, something must be wrong with your idea of how rockets work.
loperspest 3 years ago
This comment stands as proof of the daft and silly mental processes of the hoaxers.
soakupthesunman 2 years ago
How can it survive on the moon without a space suite?
I think this video is fake.
gabydewilde 3 years ago
Because they weren't on the Moon, there were somewhere in Texas.
The Moon landings are fake.
Artifalia 3 years ago
One small step for man. One giant leap for ghwb and the nwo!
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Yes, haahhaah, very glad to see your kind and funny comment. Thank you. Cheers!
Artifalia 3 years ago
ohh, they lie to us!
gabydewilde 3 years ago
You solve all the anomalies with technical things. Don't try to convince me, I know these are frogs.
Artifalia 3 years ago
Those "frogs" are, in fact, the light getting reflected inside the camera lens.
smlbstcbr 3 years ago
No man has ever gotten further than several hundred miles out {from Mother Earth}. The Magnetosphere is the shield, therefor as logic would dictate: it shields us. Compared with the outer space that lies beyond it: the magnetosphere is easy. The stars from space must be brilliant, given the fact that no cloudy Earthen atmosphere blurs them. The great music of the 1960's were T.V. themes.
procommenter 3 years ago
Yes, I agree. Thanks for the comment. Well, seeing that you have knowledge about it...do you know the difference between the mangnetosphere and the Van Hallen radiation belts?
Artifalia 3 years ago
The Van Allen Radiation Belts are contained within, what's referred to as, the magnetosphere. The purpose of these protective layers is to trap and filter cosmic matter, x-rays, the solar winds and so forth. It's the buffer between us and inhospitable outer space. Before Man can become an interplanetary voyager he must construct space craft that can truly protect him from penetrative forces. No human can knock about the cosmos in a thin-skinned lunar module.
procommenter 3 years ago
Wow,..ok procommenter...thank you very much. Now I have it really clear.
We'd better take care of this planet, cause we haven't made those space crafts yet! This Apollo hoax has been much more harmful than many people think. That sentence of "he who controls the Moon controls the Earth" is very truth. So it is very important that the masses know that, otherwise they are living in a Walt Disney World! Big hug,
Pere
Artifalia 3 years ago
Cancer's a metabolic disease. No metabolic disease can be cured thru mechanical measures. Trophoblast (healing cells) & cancer cells are one-and-the-same. Amygdalin {found in the seeds of 1,400 fruits} is the body's defense against & control for these left-over/errant cells. My wife grew up in Saigon during the war. She can recall 1 neighbor, out of 100's, coming down w/cancer. The Vietnamese eat bamboo daily. It's rich in Amygdalin (vitamin B17). {See: "A World Without Cancer"}
procommenter 3 years ago
Man, is like you have read my mind. I was wondering if it was B70 or B17, cause these days I had been thinking about that. Now that we all have to get ready to become self sufficient, if we can, even with the electricity, all this information becomes crucial for our survival. Thanks again procommenter, I'll send you a friends request, so we can keep in touch!
Artifalia 3 years ago
Watch G. Edward Griffin's film: "A World Without Cancer" on You-Tube. I have anecdotal evidence from within my family that vitamin B17 {a.k.a. Amygdalin} is the control for malignant cells.
procommenter 3 years ago
Ok,...and some more words otherwise the system doesn't allow me just to say ok!
Artifalia 3 years ago
Magnetosphere does not block mass from going through it...it blocks the suns rays, flares, and rays from other stars that travel a long distance..
manmythlegend12 3 years ago
What he isn't telling you is that the magnetosphere only traps particle radiation, which is easily stopped by a few centimeters aluminum. I am not saying I would want to stay in their for a long time, but the astronauts only spent about an hour total. The soviets and other countries tracked the craft on radar, they knew how long the transit was, the know it was real, despite it being in their best interests to declare a fake.
loperspest 3 years ago
Are you a bot or something? I read exactly the same thing TWICE on another video.
loperspest 3 years ago
It's a cardinal sin to post a comment twice, although it's acceptable to tell a stranger that his mother is a sodomite.
procommenter 3 years ago
May I ask just what you are implying?
loperspest 3 years ago
Armstrong's brain told him to jump like a frog, because he had just seen one. Go back to kinder garden. And yes you can hop around without raising dust but don't ask me how, ask Kubrick.
Artifalia 3 years ago
Okasy, you morons. Did you notice that he was not raising a dust cloud hopping around on what was obviously a powdery surface? Can you do that other than in a vacuum? HELL NO!. Grow a brain, will ya?
leftysergeant 3 years ago
A micro meteorite?? I don't think so, and I'm 43...And either the producers didn't even see it , at first, or they thought it was not that obvious at that time.
Artifalia 3 years ago
the moon landings were NOT a hoax, i, a 13-year-old can tell you that that "frog" is a micro medeorite. Besides, if there was a frog on the set dont you think that the "producers"
would have re-filmed the scene without the "frogs"?
bendl2 3 years ago
Hahaha, yes, probalby. At least I can count two!
Artifalia 3 years ago
There's more than one?
Probably used a Houston pest control company!
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Houston pest control company? Maybe not. Maybe Gov Bush didn't deny the last appeals of the frogs at least?
nameofthepen 3 years ago 2
Hahah, I think I understand what you mean. This research was done by a website called Coppernicus II. I just made a video, to show that frog jumping around...(that little white dot that is pointed). Thanks for the comment. I like your channel too!
Artifalia 3 years ago
There are no blast craters beneath any of the lunar modules. Shadows don't run parallel in the Apollo films. Armstrong took focused photos with a chest-mounted camera. The lunar module's climate controls were battery-operated. Astronauts are brightly lit while in shadow. Moonscapes for different missions, miles apart, are exactly the same. These are incontrovertible facts. Make of them what you will.
procommenter 3 years ago
Yes, I agree! Let's hope we can see these liars impeached.
Artifalia 3 years ago
Hey, procommenter, you moron learn something about cameras. He used a Hasselblad single-lens reflex camera. The viewfinder in on the TOP of the camera, and is about two inches by two inches. You conspiratoids sure don't bother to investigate stuff very well. No wonder we have people who think missiles can bnlow airplane-shaped holes in things.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
Sister, your romantic life, in &
out, of jail is none of my concern.
procommenter 3 years ago
that's it all i needed lets put it to bed, charge all of them with perjury.
freepress666 4 years ago 2
Do you see the frogs? No one has debunked that yet!
Artifalia 4 years ago
They will probably make some idiotic excuse like, they jumped onto the rocket before it left... Even look at the guy jumping. This is so stupid if they want you to believe "this is the moon"
OperationDB 4 years ago
Exactly! I think that somehow subconsciously Mr. Aldrin was jumping like a frog because he was seeing them! So he was predicting that sooner or later the world would realize this huge hoax! Now I see that we agree. Indeed, this is Texas, not the Moon. Cheers!
Artifalia 4 years ago