I think the ending of this report needs to be redone. I listened to it 10 times and each time it leaves me confused. I think it's important to make something like this extremely clear. He discusses, links, authors, by lines, reports, originals, newsletters, articles, posted, His newsletter, etc. Please clarify this.
And Ron Paul said he wouldn't have voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964. When asked if he would allow restaurant owners to refuse to serve black people, he avoided answering yes or no, but basically his answer was yes, it was their right to not serve black people.
@db528 - Suppose a black restaurant owner had someone come in wearing a KKK robe. Does he have the right to refuse service to him? If your answer is yes, you'd be incorrect, according to the 1964 Civil Rights act. That is exactly why Ron opposes parts of the Act.
@Ncturnal I don't care. KKK members wouldn't want to go into a black owned restaurant. But, if they do, and they are paying customers not causing any trouble, they should not be refused service. A restaurant owner is legally allowed to refuse service to anyone who is unreasonably rowdy or causing trouble, or if they lack adequate hygiene.
Well it's true dumbass, if some stupid NIGGER came into a restaurant I own, and started causing a problem I'd kick him out too. You sound like you're a fucking paid troll.
Sure they should, do you think they would get business if they put such a racist policy in today's world? Nope they wouldn't.
And too be honest man, if you did your research, you know that out of the 10/11 codes in the civil rights act, ron paul disowned only two, which had to do with PERSONAL PROPERTY.
So please, next time do your research before you just blurt things you happen to hear other people say.
or hell, even a youtube video. You try to outwit me with some form of logic? yet, you won't even go do research on the subject your own self. Which in fact is pretty damn sad.
@Bushiey You misunderstood my question. It was rhetorical. Yes, the personal property rights that Ron Paul espouses would allow an employer to discriminate based on the color of one's skin or their gender. I guess the question I should have asked was: Are you comfortable with that?
And again, do you really think a business owner would get business if he refused a person of any color business? Probably not. Welcome to 2012.
And the civil rights act of 1964 did infringe property rights. Thats proven fact, bringing up race as in issue, just shows how closed minded you really are. And people such as yourself, who aren't even of color, is what always keeps racism going.
@Bushiey The Civil Rights Act of 1964 infringed on the right of business owners to discriminate in hiring and salary practices. Should an employer be allowed to pay minorities and women less than white men for doing the same job? I say no. And, by the way, I may be white, but I am a woman, so discrimination in the workplace affects me too.
@db528 Racist? Do you mean like the Miss Black Amerca pageant? They don't allow white people in their group. Who's the racists?
And yes, business owners have the right to refuse service to anyone at anytime for any reason. But it would do serious harm to their business in most areas of the country if they did. The only color that matters to most business owners is green.
@mrdivot22 Before the Civil Rights Act, business owners were allowed to discriminate against and sexually harass their employees. That's a bigger issue.
@keeda279 let me ask you a question... then after you answer... I will ask you the same question again then after you answer,again... I will ask you again then you answer again then I ask again and so on (sounds fun) if you do not answer or stop answering,then it will be you who avoids questions. so here it goes Do you like eating poop?
The race card .. the last refuge of the scoundrel. The oldest card in the book for keeping Americans fighting with each other while the real criminals at the top get away with literal murder.
AND THIS IS ALL THE MAINSTREAM ESTABLISHMENT MEDIA CAN COME UP WITH ON PAUL .. AND ALL OVER THESE SO-CALLED COUNTERFEIT CONSERVATIVE RADIO AND TV SHOWS THEY CONTINUE TO PARROT THESE STRAWMAN ATTACKS.
Only reason the newsletters are a big deal because they can't find anything else wrong with him. Its very petty and shows the level of childishness of people that want to fling "racist" because they have no leg to stand on in an argument.
Youtube is racist because the background is white.
montebosss 1 month ago
The end shows that Kirchick's attack article was done while dishonestly withholding the truth.
orrerystar 1 month ago
I think the ending of this report needs to be redone. I listened to it 10 times and each time it leaves me confused. I think it's important to make something like this extremely clear. He discusses, links, authors, by lines, reports, originals, newsletters, articles, posted, His newsletter, etc. Please clarify this.
megaprinciples 1 month ago
What did the ending of this video mean? Everything he just said can't be validated or what?
megaprinciples 1 month ago
First of all, how would any of those things be racist? Gangs are ALL RACES.
natalilove09 1 month ago
So this is what real journalism is like. how refreshing!
mobagot 1 month ago
I wish there was like, a 24 hour cigarette delivery system. that'd be freakin awesome
thedarkshitstain 1 month ago
It's amazing what people claim is racist nowadays... any time I hear someone yell racist I have a hard time taking anything else they say seriously.
mattjan44 1 month ago
Much respect to Ben Swann, great integrity and now my favorite person in the media.
FordGTGuy 1 month ago
And Ron Paul said he wouldn't have voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964. When asked if he would allow restaurant owners to refuse to serve black people, he avoided answering yes or no, but basically his answer was yes, it was their right to not serve black people.
db528 1 month ago
@db528 - Suppose a black restaurant owner had someone come in wearing a KKK robe. Does he have the right to refuse service to him? If your answer is yes, you'd be incorrect, according to the 1964 Civil Rights act. That is exactly why Ron opposes parts of the Act.
Ncturnal 1 month ago
@Ncturnal I don't care. KKK members wouldn't want to go into a black owned restaurant. But, if they do, and they are paying customers not causing any trouble, they should not be refused service. A restaurant owner is legally allowed to refuse service to anyone who is unreasonably rowdy or causing trouble, or if they lack adequate hygiene.
db528 1 month ago
@db528
Well it's true dumbass, if some stupid NIGGER came into a restaurant I own, and started causing a problem I'd kick him out too. You sound like you're a fucking paid troll.
Go get a new job.
By the way, i'm black, are you ANGRY DUDE?
Bushiey 1 month ago
@Bushiey And should a white restaurant owner be allowed to refuse to serve black people if they are NOT rowdy or causing trouble? I say no.
And I'm not being paid by anyone. Are you being paid by the Ron Paul campaign?
Not that it's any of your business, but I'm voting for President Obama.
db528 1 month ago
@db528
Sure they should, do you think they would get business if they put such a racist policy in today's world? Nope they wouldn't.
And too be honest man, if you did your research, you know that out of the 10/11 codes in the civil rights act, ron paul disowned only two, which had to do with PERSONAL PROPERTY.
So please, next time do your research before you just blurt things you happen to hear other people say.
Bushiey 1 month ago
@Bushiey And do personal property codes include the right of an employer to discriminate based on the color of one's skin or their gender?
db528 1 month ago
@db528
Dude, i'm sorry, but youre an idiot. You really need to do research before you blurt what your mommy and daddy tells you.
Bushiey 1 month ago
@Bushiey You're rude, and you didn't answer my question. Maybe you're rude because you didn't have a good answer to my question. Could that be it?
Once again -- do personal property codes include the right of an employer to discriminate based on the color of one's skin or their gender?
db528 1 month ago
@db528
Go read it yourself? This is why I call you an idiot, you won't even go read the civil rights act for yourself... so... yeah...gg
Bushiey 1 month ago
@db528
or hell, even a youtube video. You try to outwit me with some form of logic? yet, you won't even go do research on the subject your own self. Which in fact is pretty damn sad.
Bushiey 1 month ago
@Bushiey You misunderstood my question. It was rhetorical. Yes, the personal property rights that Ron Paul espouses would allow an employer to discriminate based on the color of one's skin or their gender. I guess the question I should have asked was: Are you comfortable with that?
db528 1 month ago
@db528
And again, do you really think a business owner would get business if he refused a person of any color business? Probably not. Welcome to 2012.
And the civil rights act of 1964 did infringe property rights. Thats proven fact, bringing up race as in issue, just shows how closed minded you really are. And people such as yourself, who aren't even of color, is what always keeps racism going.
Just let us deal with people segregating on us.
Bushiey 1 month ago
@Bushiey The Civil Rights Act of 1964 infringed on the right of business owners to discriminate in hiring and salary practices. Should an employer be allowed to pay minorities and women less than white men for doing the same job? I say no. And, by the way, I may be white, but I am a woman, so discrimination in the workplace affects me too.
db528 1 month ago
@db528 Racist? Do you mean like the Miss Black Amerca pageant? They don't allow white people in their group. Who's the racists?
And yes, business owners have the right to refuse service to anyone at anytime for any reason. But it would do serious harm to their business in most areas of the country if they did. The only color that matters to most business owners is green.
mrdivot22 1 month ago
@mrdivot22 Before the Civil Rights Act, business owners were allowed to discriminate against and sexually harass their employees. That's a bigger issue.
db528 1 month ago
@mrdivot22 And, by the way, any minority or woman who votes for Ron Paul is a fool!
db528 1 month ago
@db528
Oh, and if Ron Paul is a racist why did NAACP president endorse him?
Bushiey 1 month ago
@Bushiey He didn't endorse him. He said Ron Paul isn't a racist. I disagree.
db528 1 month ago
@Bushiey And it wasn't the president of the NAACP. It was the president of the Austin chapter of the NAACP.
db528 1 month ago
Propaganda video from the Ron Paul campaign.
db528 1 month ago
The only thing I agree with in this video is that all the Republican candidates are racist. Ron Paul is definitely a racist, sexist, homophobic jerk.
db528 1 month ago
This reporter is excellent.
greenback001 1 month ago
if he nothing to hide and its not racist - why is he keep avoiding the questions regarding this Racist Articles - lol - byebye ron
keeda279 1 month ago
@keeda279
What question did he avoid?. He disowned them, disavowed them, assumed moral responsibility... what do you want from him to give you a blowjob?.
bluesrockfan36 1 month ago
evnwood 1 month ago
Reality Check > Main Stream Media.
Bushiey 1 month ago
This is real journalism. CNN should take note.
AzuAtoms 1 month ago
RONPAUL2012 . COM !!!
N8Revolution 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The race card .. the last refuge of the scoundrel. The oldest card in the book for keeping Americans fighting with each other while the real criminals at the top get away with literal murder.
N8Revolution 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This Powell guy was probably a Patriot Movement infiltrator .. This was going on alot during this timeframe.
N8Revolution 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AND THIS IS ALL THE MAINSTREAM ESTABLISHMENT MEDIA CAN COME UP WITH ON PAUL .. AND ALL OVER THESE SO-CALLED COUNTERFEIT CONSERVATIVE RADIO AND TV SHOWS THEY CONTINUE TO PARROT THESE STRAWMAN ATTACKS.
N8Revolution 1 month ago
I these reality checks.
It's also my username.
RealityChecker77 1 month ago 2
Great piece!!
Puabond 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I hope everyone mirrors this!
spoony2112 1 month ago
I wonder if CNN will look into this?
carp1844 1 month ago
@carp1844 Doubt it. Their motto should be, any good news, is bad news.
sacrux 1 month ago
Islam and all religions are wrong!
exmuslimNfree 1 month ago
@exmuslimNfree Not true... My religion is right,I know it is because I made it up myself:)
evnwood 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dr. Ron Paul's message of Liberty will resonate with Americans long after he dies.
RON PAUL 2012!
LGJohnnyFive 1 month ago 3
Only reason the newsletters are a big deal because they can't find anything else wrong with him. Its very petty and shows the level of childishness of people that want to fling "racist" because they have no leg to stand on in an argument.
screwopenborders 1 month ago 13
@screwopenborders and now they have nothing to hold against him. He is now CLEAN and ready to be our president YES!!!
fromero69 1 month ago 20
You can't honestly defend those statements by Bachmen and that fucking rock by Perry... That's just racist plain and simple.
Sigrafix 1 month ago