Why are athiest numbskulls so freakin hostile? Christians dont go around berating your religion. And a religion is defined as a system of beliefs, so dont tell me your not religious. Evolution? Also a religion.
@mjs2212 In that sense everything will be a religion. Even believing that I exist will be a religion, believing in the earth being round is a religion, believing in gravity is a religion.
Haha! He should be wearing a clowns outfit! Why is he going against the vast vast majority of scientists? Makes you wonder how much he is getting paid by creationist ministers. Where there are stupid people there is money to be made. Lol
Its awesome how people will deny evolution but still go to the doctors when they are sick.....Evolution is the back bone of much of medical sceince and biology
Well who is "they"? because it seems you were taught by kent hovind! not a single scientist teaches anything like that. You have just shown an unbelievably gross misunderstanding of evolution. Just as you misunderstood the difference between the slowing rate of the earth's rotation and the way we keep time records (another mistake of kent hovind funnily enough).
The earth has slowed 0.2 milliseconds in 190 years. The reason for the leap-second (or 0.9 seconds to be precise) is because the yearly clock does not perfectly match the single orbit.
I don't know if I should even bother having a go at the rest this nonsense, since people like on of the guys below me think evolution means an elephant can just turn into a manatee. I have never heard anything so stupid.
Ok, we do not have to look into space to see how old our own planet is. I will throw out all the evidence regarding fossils, and geology dating this planet in the billions. The bible says it was created 4000 years ago? Read below:
"Methuselah" was 4,789 years old when sampled in 1957 by Edmund Schulman and Tom Harlan, with estimated germination 2832 BC. Methuselah is the oldest known living tree and non-clonal organism in the world—4,842 years old as of 2011.
Why does ACTUAL evidence bother you knuckleheads? What is your evidence - that an elephant became a manatee and the other things evolution teaches that can't be proven? Evolution is pseudo-science adn a waste of time.
@thesacredcowtipper You think evolution teaches that an elephant can just become a manatee. You are trying to argue against something about which you are hopelessly ignorant
@groundsman They teach it. I'm not the one teaching it. I think it is hilarious along with many other things they teach. Palaeontologists believe that they now have 99.5% of all the fossils they are ever going to find. Every species has millions of missing links so macro evolution will always be a NON-PROVEN theory. Until we see it actually happen, it is just wating tax-payer dollars.
-Magnetic field..... it dosnt always decrease in power. It just started to lately, since the poles are shifting, or prepareing to do that. Or maybe the core of Earth, is just doing to stop rotating and generating that field.... it will eventually, though likely wont in the next 200 or 1000 years. Dont know.
- Earth slowing down 1sec a year..... even if thats true, it dosnt mean it was spinning real fast at the start. And no people wouldnt be tossed of the equator, even if it would spin fast.
But maybe its just that 60sek based clocks are inaccurate, and it should be 60,5 seconds.
So it gets shifted every now and then. If your not just making that up.
-Saltier ocean.... aint it the opposite, with that polar caps melting and all.
And we dont even know all that much about the ocean bottom. Besides, it aint a puddle of salty water thats still, waves at the top are just eye candy, there are plenty of currents in the sea aswell, to wash all that away + little creatures that eat stuff.
A magical, all powerful, all knowing, omni present, jewish zomby who fathered himself in the future, went back in time, and made everything in a week, then took a rest (well even allpowerful get tired), then made man, in his image, (which seems quite flawed) to subjugate every life form out there, and those who hadnt heard of the creator, and women.
And now takes pleasure in peeping on everyone to find out who to send to eternal torment, yet loves everyone.
Or atleast i hope its not true. Being born in to a universe created by a schizophrenic, paranoid, narcissistic, sadistic, bisexual sociopath, who happens to unconditionally love everyone at the same time.
Classical creationist tactic: cram as many lies and fallacies into six minutes as you can so that anyone who would like to correct their information as no clue where to start, because every single sentence was just wrong. I mean, seriously 'no evidence that the Mississippi has been running for billions of years' -- that's because it hasn't! Maybe in the tens of millions of years. I'd have to look that up.
NASA scientists were "distressed"? WTF? Does he figure that all astronomers are part of a secret conspiracy to prove the bible wrong? Dammit, the reason those spacecraft were sent out were to find the truth, not hope that reality matched some pre-conceived notion... why spend billions sending them out in the first place? Why teach scientists for a decade or so in University about math, logic, and infuse them with a desire for understanding? what a ridiculous view this man has of the world.
Oh oh I've got one. "Hey i can prove the Bible with science! It rained half an inch today. It also rained half an inch yesterday. This proves that the earth must be 10,000 years old or else the oceans would be higher than the highest mountain!"
It is a sin to use knowledge and observable evidence to justify your arguments. Remember that it was the Serpent who tempted us to eat of the Tree of Knowledge and God who warned us not to. It was Satan who asked Jesus for demonstrable proof that he could perform miracles and Doubting Thomas who sinfully asked for visible proof of Jesus' resurrection. It was Satan who put the fossils in the rocks to get us to believe in evolution and it is Satan who creates the images we see through telescopes.
@EqualAndFree Yep. Real shame creationists don't have the balls to follow through on rejecting modern science... they'd naturally die out thanks to a lack of food, shelter and medicine. I might even be forced to shed a tear.
The atheists ultimate weapon is the Vortex cannon ! Is soo big we diguised it as an oil pipeline , clever huh . Polystrate fossils , ohh geez, read a book . Earths magnetic field changes strength , and reverses, changes position of the poles over time. Its a generated field , not a slowly weakening bar magnet. 150 years is not a lot of time. If you project back far enough Earth would be pulling all iron in the solar system to itself, we know a lot about previous field strengths from rocks.
THE DAY ANY FUCKER START DESTROYING SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS IS THE DAY THAT I AM GONA GO OUT, GRAB SOME GRANADES AND START KILLING ALL FUCKIN MOTHER FUCKER ANTI-SCIENCE PENDEJO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 DE MIERDA CULEROS!!!
Science may be the atheists ultimate weapon, but us young earth creationists have been crafting our own religious ICBM in this logical arms race: the banana.
This guy is a huge idiot. Obviously has no idea what the fuck plate tech-tonics are, and how earth is an active planet with an active core that recycles itself via convection, bringing in the outer layers of earth in, and reshaping itself.
And what the fuck was the whole speel about our main asteroid belt? How does it having irregular shapes and sizes of asteroids = young solar system?
and the whole idea of saying because saturns rings are perfect = young solar system is highly suspect.
Pseudo-science nonsense at it's finest, I really wouldn't know where to begin in showing this person how wrong they are. This is really just dishearteningly ignorant...
creationists mar the face of christianity and make the followers seem like idiotic rednecks.
Also - the hebrew word for 'day' means period of time. If you take the bible literally you will stone your daughter to death when she loses her virginity (outside marriage) and cut off your hands and pull out your eyes out if you lust over a woman. From an agnostic.
There are indications that the world is not as old as we are told. For instance, at the bottom of the world it says it was made in China. It is also made from a form of plastic rubber which was not around until 1943.
Here's a though! Try investigating for yourself instead of just believing what you are told! Something tells me this man's audience has never done that. If they did, they probably wouldn't be in church anymore.
@FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 The last time i looked dogs still produce dogs and cows still produce cows and humans still produce humans............Charles Darwin was a priest who came up with dumb theory and the idiots so called scientists want to believe it
@democracyrules2000 the only reason cows produce cow and dogs produce doge is because we say they do by definition. a dog gives birth to a living thing, then we change the definition of a dog so the new living thing can be a dog, then the process continues. it's only a dog because we allow it to be, it never has a chance to be. go back to high school.
@FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 I did not know that too much Whisky can do all that.......Dogs still produce dogs............you cannot change that.............Evolution theory is nothing but trash............bye bye evolution dumb theory................hehhehehhe
@democracyrules2000 define specie first of all. also, how much change would it take for there to be a new specie? you do realize that it's impossible to have a new specie unless we as humans call it a new one. the next time a dog give birth, it doesn't give birth to a dog unless we change the definition of dogs, and so on. so, what your point that dogs always gave birth to dogs?
@democracyrules2000 Who tries to change dogs producing dogs? Do yourself a favour and find out what Evolution IS before you reject it, by implying that you think Evolution states that a dog gives birth to a bird or a fish, you show you haven't got the least bit of understanding of it. I was initially going to comment on how utterly stupid this video was, but your comment's stupidity actually took priority.
Evolution has overwhelming scientific evidence in its favour. It's never been disproven.
@rvfharrier I know what evolution is..........stupid theory with zero proof........Only stupid person believes in stupid theory.............hmmmmmmmmmm........It must be you................heheehhehehe
@democracyrules2000 No you really don't know what it is, you were claiming that evolution is wrong becaues 'dogs produce dogs'. By saying that you're implying that goes against Evolution, which it doesn't in the slightest. No offence, well actually quite a bit of offence, intended but I think the scientists who came up with, and the current generation of scientists who overwhelmingly support, the theory are a lot more intelligent than you. Saying it has 0 proof is beyond ostrich-esque ignorance.
@democracyrules2000 Similarities between almost every lifeform on Earth, huge similarities between us and modern apes, we both lack the ability to make vitamin C which every other mammal can do, vestigial structures, the number of chromosomes for us and modern apes, the ability to trace a lot of lifeforms back to common ancestors, variation within species (e.g. different types of dogs), viruses becoming immune to antibiotics, pests becoming immune to pesticide, atavistic genes and noncoding DNA.
@rvfharrier Let me make this point about all that you said: So your proof that evolution is a fact is based on similarities that we see between every lifeform on earth. Can these similarities imply common creator?????............hmmmmm..........if this is your proof of evolution then I suggest you get your head examined cuz your proof is pure speculation. Cuz i see apes and humans have DNAs then apes are the ancestors of humans????.........PURE SPECULATION.......
@democracyrules2000 It could imply a common creator but on its own is in no way evidence of it, how would apes be the ancestors of humans? Past does not follow present, ancestors come before the descendents. Similarities on its own would not be sufficient evidence for evolution, but (incase you didn't realise) I also listed 8 other points from two minutes of thinking that you failed to address. With them all, independently, pointing to the exact same conclusion we can declare Evolution a fact.
@rvfharrier I'm still waiting for the evidence for the dumb theory of evolution ........all your points are pure speculation..........I laughed regarding the vitamin C one............You are a master in Pure speculation............Zero evidence so far.........any others out there??????????
@democracyrules2000 No actually, I'M still waiting for YOU to refute the points I gave you. My points are not pure speculation, these have all been observed within fossils, within microbiology or within your own eyes. Laughing at it is not refuting it, it just shows you don't know how to go about refuting it. How do you explain atavisms? Why are humans still occassionally born with tails? Do you deny that there are different types of cats and dogs? What about 98% of our DNA being noncoding?
@democracyrules2000 The Vitamin C point is that humans and apes both lack the ability to make Vitamin C due to a gene responsible for making it being broken (in exactly the same way), no other mammal has that gene broken in that way. It shows that at some point our common ancestor had that broken gene (GULO) and both modern apes and humans diverged from that ancestor after that gene lost its function. Don't just laugh at this, debate me back, show me why you're laughing at it. Unless you can't?
@democracyrules2000 Also while we're talking about this, I'll expand evolution to cover non-evolution as well, do you believe in a young earth? As in the universe and the Earth were created 6,000 years ago?
@rvfharrier I certainly believe in a young earth...........this idea of billion of years is just a way to hide behind evolution cuz it will sound even more stupid without that extra time.
@democracyrules2000 You took 3 days to reply with this? Ah well, I'm guessing you've abandoned your 'evolution is a stupid theory' stance since you've stopped trying to refute it and basically just ignored what you couldn't answer. So now you say you're a YEC this makes it even easier for me, you couldn't refute evolution and now you're going to have to try to justify a 6,000 year old universe. Do you want to provide evidence for it first or shall I just get on with refutation?
@democracyrules2000 Actually I did, I provided evidence that you refused to acknowledge; if it's so flawed then why can't you refute it? You take the typical creationist stance, you don't know how to refute the evidence so you just ignore it and pretend the person putting it forward never said anything. Go back to my post and explain all of those observable occurances in nature and show how they couldn't possibly be evidence for Evolution. Just saying "that's stupid" shows nothing but ignorance.
@democracyrules2000 You know what, I'm starting to get really sick of this. You're, either by purposeful trolling or through your own idiocy, wasting my time. You take days at a time to reply with one sentence that is always the same "Hurr, give me evidence hurr".
I give you evidence, you don't attempt at all to refute it and just immediately claim to falsify it without explaining how or why. I HAVE given you evidence, you've simply ignored it and refused to even acknowledge it.
@rvfharrier Give one evidence at a time and we discuss it............stop playing......one evidence at a time...................give your first and I will respond.............Can you understand that??????
@democracyrules2000 I've already presented my first batch of evidence that you're yet to even try to refute, if you want then I'll copy and paste it again to bring it to the front and then you can deal with it in whichever way you like, one at a time or all in one go. Your choice. But atleast try to refute it otherwise you set your default position as having accepted the fact that you can't refute it, thereby terminally weakening your already unfounded position.
@democracyrules2000 Similarities between almost every lifeform on Earth, huge similarities between us and modern apes, we both lack the ability to make vitamin C which every other mammal can do, vestigial structures, the number of chromosomes for us and modern apes, the ability to trace a lot of lifeforms back to common ancestors, variation within species (e.g. different types of dogs), viruses becoming immune to antibiotics, pests becoming immune to pesticide, atavistic genes and noncoding DNA.
@rvfharrier Similarities between almost every lifeform on Earth s not a proof of evolution since I can say it shows common designer or creator..........So we both speculationg.........i hope you got the point.
@democracyrules2000 No, similarities on their own are not definitive proof of evolution. They're evidence in support of it, but only when combined with the dozens of other independent factors observed in nature do they actually become proof. The other independent factors being the ones you, once again, failed to address. I am not speculating, you are speculating in believing something that you can't see, hear, touch, feel or taste and then simply stating that a well established theory is false.
@rvfharrier Your first point is not a proof of evolution.............Give your next point and i will comment................So far I'm ahead............you said it is not a proof............Next point please
@democracyrules2000 Read what I said, they are not definitive proof ON THEIR OWN. They ARE still evidence of evolution, but scientifically are not conclusive enough to prove evolution occurs. You're still doing it, picking and choosing which of my points you respond to and which points you ignore based on your ability to answer them. What about the rest? Variation within species? Atavisms? Noncoding DNA? Viral immunities? Vestiges? Transitions? Impefections in nature?
@rvfharrier I said one point at a time...........Why your brain cannot comprehend that????.............stop listing 10 points and asking for a debate.........I have time for one point at a time each day.............I pray that your brain finally understood that.........still No proof.............let me move to the second point which variation within the same kind........Variations within the same kind is certainly scientific and we observe that. But still within the same kind and no new kind.
@democracyrules2000 Ah, so you do admit to variation within species? Then like it or not, you've subliminally admitted that you accept evolution too.
Variation within species is due to slightly different genetics, those genes programming for longer snouts or different fur patterns etc. Those exact same gene variations multiply over millions of years to the point where the end organism is a different species to the one it started from. Variation is just a evolution at any one instant in time.
@rvfharrier Variations yes and within the same kind...........Big dog......small dog.....It is still a dog..........cuz of this you evolutionists go wild and assume sure one kind of animal can turn to another kind of animal.........NO PROOF on that amigo.,,,,,just pure speculation..............and now we come to natural selection......natural selection only selects, it does not create a new kind..........wake up evolutionists.......
@democracyrules2000 Ok, and do you admit that there are different kinds of animals? This should be pretty obvious. Look around, you see fish and birds. You must admit that life is different and that life is different to how life used to be in the fossils we dig up. Whether this is via evolution or God creating new life doesn't matter at this point, as long as you agree that life is different compared to how life was at some time in the past.
@democracyrules2000 Oh come on, look at a skeleton of a dinosaur or of a pre-mesozoic animal like a Dimetrodon. Generally life has changed from reptile dominated to mammal dominated, animals have gotten much smaller and has become better adapted for the current environment. Time scales or forces resonsible don't matter at this point, as long as you agree that life observed in fossil form (past) is different to life observed in nature now.
@rvfharrier Can you prove and show all of us which animal turned into another animal.???..............is that what you're trying to show?????...............Can we repeat the process or we need millions or billions of years????..........I hope you are not back to pure speculations
@democracyrules2000 I'm asking a very simple question which you seem to be needlessly dodging. Regardless of cause, divine or not; do you agree that life has changed since some point in the past? It's incredibly simple.
@rvfharrier I don't believe life has changed at all..............Sure you might ride a car now and not ride a horse...........and you might eat lousy food now instead of freshly cooked food...............you got the point???????????
@democracyrules2000 No, you're talking about life-style- changes. If you're actually denying the fact that life its self has become altered throughout history then you're simply willfully ignorant in certain areas if it suits your faith. Look at fossils, then look at life now, then try to convince yourself life hasn't in some way changed.
If you can't accept that basic fact simply because it might end up questioning your faith then no wonder you want to believe evolution isn't true either.
@rvfharrier I keep asking for examples and you keep refusing to bring any...........Tell us I beg you how life itself became altered.............stop talking in general terms and give examples...............Let's all here learn from you.............GIVE EXAMPLESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS...........I love when evolutionists talk about fossils..............come on amigo give us examples and teach us.
@democracyrules2000 Have you never seen a skeleton of a dinosaur? What more do you need? Do you see any 5m tall reptiles walking around anymore? No.
Reptiles dominated the world previously, now mammals do. That's a huge shift in and of its self, but there are all kinds of animals in fossil form that are completely different to how we see life in our time. We don't see anything today that could resemble the Dinosaurs, the Pterosaurs, giant carnivorous whales, giant marine reptiles etc.
@rvfharrier Even if there was a shift that does not prove evolution. Where is the real proof?????????? do we see half monkey and half human????????..........I just cannot understand why you cannot see that...............all you are saying is cuz there was a shift then evolution must be true...........NO Pal.........no proof yet.
- You admit that life has changed since some point in the past.
- You admit that variations in genetics cause differences in organisms.
- You admit those differences can be and are selected against.
You admit to the mechanism and the driving force of evolution and that something like it must have happened, but simply deny those stages being pieced together? You really don't know what you believe, think about it for just a second.
@democracyrules2000 Again, back to the misunderstanding of evolution where you wrongly think it states that we should find hybrid organisms.
You're looking at nature through a manmade construct of species, nature doesn't recognise or adhere to these taxa, they're manmade ideas to describe our observations of differences in organisms. Evolution doesn't produce a 'half money/half man', it produces an ape which gradually shows more characteristics associated with humans observed with hindsight.
@rvfharrier I quote "Evolution doesn't produce a 'half money/half man', it produces an ape which gradually shows more characteristics associated with humans observed with hindsight."............How do you know that????...........HOW HOW HOW????...........Where is your proof?????..........you are simply speculating.........Did you see an ape with human characteristics???.......Talk is cheap...........GIVE PROOF.......
@democracyrules2000 Why do you need me to be telling you all this? It shows you clearly haven't even bothered to do the research yourself, you claim to know about evolution and still be able to dismiss it but you've shown yourself over time to know only slightly more than nothing about it. No wonder you dismiss it if you refuse to even learn about it.
I'm gonna send you a link through PM, since youtube doesn't allow them. It's a page on the timeline of human evolution from talk origins.
@rvfharrier I repeat and in front of all.............How do you know that evolution produces an ape which gradually shows more characteristics associated with humans observed with hindsight?......You refused to answer in ur last email.......I give you one more chance..........Answer if you dare................
@democracyrules2000 How did I refuse to answer? I sent you a link that has all of the fossils and all of the 'missing links' you creationists love to rant about. We know because we've seen it, go to that website and look at the evidence. Honestly, if you need me to spoon feed you all of this because you're completely incapable of thinking for yourself and researching the facts, then no wonder you're religious.
"I can't think for myself about things, so I won't. I'll deny them."
@rvfharrier You cannot even answer a simple question.........You proved to all that this evolution theory is totally bankrupt. Maybe one day you will tell us and bring us the monkey with human characteristics..........Bye bye dead evolution theory.
@democracyrules2000 Finishing up... "In 2005, a peer-reviewed scientific journal published results of the tests. It turns out that chromosome 2, which is unique to the human lineage of evolution, emerged as a result of the head-to-head fusion of two ancestral chromosomes that remain separate in other primates. Three genetic indicators provide strong, if not conclusive, evidence of fusion. "
@democracyrules2000 Evolution doesn't say that. Do some reading, man. "Genome analysis reveals the genetic difference between humans and chimps to be less than 2 percent. In other words, humans and chimps have DNA sequences that are greater than 98 percent similar."
@hondadrvr3 ........That implies common designer............your evolution theory is simply dead with NO PROOF.......When are you going to show us a monkey with human characteristics????..............we all are waiting............I hope you don't say that it is you............hahahhahahah
@democracyrules2000 Your ignorance of what Evolution actually SAYS about our origin is astounding. You're under the impression that Evolution works like a ladder; one species turns into another as you ascend the rungs of the ladder. This is outright false. Evolution is best described as a tree. We share a COMMON ANCESTOR with apes. How difficult is that to comprehend? No one EVER said that a monkey turned into a human. Your argument is one of ignorance.
@hondadrvr3 I quote "Evolution is best described as a tree. We share a COMMON ANCESTOR with apes"........PURE Speculation...............keep dreaming with your ancestors the apes..........hehehehheheheh
@hondadrvr3 I wouldn't waste your time, your arguments are lost on this one. You are better off debating someone who is not intellectually challenged, good luck with that one.
@democracyrules2000 After evolution has produced a different species from the one it originated from, people like you then classify those two species as completely different. They look at the transitions from organism A to organism B and instead of noting a gradual step by step change from A to B in every single transition, they look at them and attribute characteristics from the final organism gained with hindsight and say 'A, A, A, A, A, B! This one is A and this one is B, missing link here!'
@democracyrules2000 Now let me ask if you acceot the idea of natural selection, the idea that organisms better adapted for the environment they're in are more likely to survive and live longer lives.
@democracyrules2000 Either engage in a proper debate with me, whereby I provide evidence for my standpoint and you then proceed to defend yours (and then not even try to provide evidence for yours since there actually is none) through reasoning and logical explanations, or stop wasting my time. You're either a troll or just a moron, I just can't figure out which since you're likely doing a bit of both; one caused by the other.
You have one chance to actually debate me back, otherwise I'm done.
@democracyrules2000 Just off the top of my head, so how do you explain all of that? Waiting for you to refute. Nevermind just the absurdity of the alternative, that the universe is 6000 years old? Refuting Young Earth Creationism doesn't prove Evolution (that was what the last post was for), but it shows your level of gullability and stubbornness that you'll believe YEC with all of its non-evidence (and plain absurdity) over Evolution with its wealth of evidence.
@democracyrules2000 Tell me. How ignorant do you have to be, or how distant do you have to be from, I'm assuming, Christianity in forming your own zealous beliefs as to reject Evolution given that John Paul II (the last Pope) accepted Evolution as a fact and said that it was able to be taken hand in hand with religion? Evolution doesn't necessarily rule out God, I don't believe God does use Evolution to regulate life but atleast those that do are capable of looking at and accepting the evidence.
This man is right, the earth had to be created, there is not way a Moron of such Caliber can be a pruduct of the evolutionary process.
Evolution try improve the average, and for a brain to come out with such poor capacity of logic there must be such a huge number of bad mutation that it will never survive.
Only a God can make an speciment like this.
We must pray that this man do no reproduce, because this seems to be a really bad see tha it may really put the human species in jeopardy.
What a load of crock. He's even got the shot of Saturn upside down...rather like Creationist arguments.
His 'mud deposits' have already been shown to be pyroclastic flows, not mud at all. And as for extrapolating the Earths magnetic field strength backwards ad infinitum, words fail me. Anyone with even a little knowledge of the subject knows we are due for a magnetic field reversal sometime in the next 2000 years...and that prior to every other such event the field strength drops...like now.
This guy is seriously misinformed. He should give up his job and go back to working at fox news. His logic or at least the script that his religious leaders right for him, makes no sense at all. I rest calmly knowing that idoits like this are slowly being wiped out as the new generation is slowly gaining common sense about the world.
SPACE DUST?? FRIGGIN' SPACE DUST??! THROWING FOLKS OFF AT THE EQUATOR???! Who is this hammerhead? He learned just enough science to confuse idiots and piss off rational people.
Full of false facts. Common people, google it. The rotation has slowed roughly only by 2 milliseconds since 1820. Earth's rotation at about 6.5 hours per day/night cycle, when it was created, 4.5 billion year.
Blah blah blah, take a scientific fact either out of context, or draw false conclusion based on misunderstanding, blah blah blah... yeah, this is a GREAT fucking video. I AM CONVINCED.
Earth back then had a range of differing conditions with a range of differing cocktails, eventually something clicked and had the oppertunity to spread until oxygen generatign life forms became prevalent enough that macro-organisms "Exploded" onto the scene.
Also, Sol ain't the only star with planets, the Milky Way ain't the only galaxy with stars with planets, and I doubt the Virgo Supercluster ain't the only supercluster with galaxies with stars with planets.
Solar wind has a limited effect, you push something up without altering the orbital velocity, there will be no additional centripetal force and gravity will coutneract the force you're projecting.
Not a dense enough belt to cause things to bunch, Mars and Jupiter have a greater effect than other asteroids.
Tree grows through all that mud before dying, plants can live a long long time.
Your extrapolation of Earth's hysteresis takes no account of remanence.
LOL creationists. LOL
saguhh00 2 weeks ago
I am a young earth creationist. I also believe the moon is made of cheese. Ok well not all of it the moon landings were all on the cheese-free parts.
Pur11zz 4 weeks ago
Everything this guy says will be refuted by a undergraduate student in astronomy or geology.
astroboomboy 1 month ago
No ratings, how convenient.
astroboomboy 1 month ago
atheism = cultural Marxism
how many times have you seen or heard Judaism made fun of.
Christianity is hated due to the sheild it provides against white genocide
daviddevall 1 month ago
If evolution is a religion then the theory that the earth orbits the sun is also a religion
drsuny12 1 month ago
LOL
TheSuferwell 2 months ago
I wish this were better organized where is the follow up...
phil4508 3 months ago
there sure seems to be a lot of hostility in these posts...
phil4508 3 months ago
Why are athiest numbskulls so freakin hostile? Christians dont go around berating your religion. And a religion is defined as a system of beliefs, so dont tell me your not religious. Evolution? Also a religion.
mjs2212 4 months ago
@mjs2212 In that sense everything will be a religion. Even believing that I exist will be a religion, believing in the earth being round is a religion, believing in gravity is a religion.
astroboomboy 1 month ago
Haha! He should be wearing a clowns outfit! Why is he going against the vast vast majority of scientists? Makes you wonder how much he is getting paid by creationist ministers. Where there are stupid people there is money to be made. Lol
TAER99 4 months ago
"it is decaying at an expodential rate" - not only is he making up the science as he goes along, he's making up the words too.
dsimpsonbeck 4 months ago
lol, thats quite lame lmao
joe3123 5 months ago
I lost consciousness halfway through...that's not good right?
dotmadhack 5 months ago
I hate to say this to you, but it's you sir (creationism) that drove me from Christianity to atheism
HS225 6 months ago
So much stupidity in 5minutes and 48 seconds...
CrayBG 7 months ago
What an absolute fool.
JaySmith91 7 months ago
Did he say “at an expedential rate” what a moron,
foiran 7 months ago
no references as to the exponential decline in the earth's magnetic field?
scarletharlot69 8 months ago
who is this?
scarletharlot69 8 months ago
Ever noticed how ratings are never disabled for videos that don't suck?
kiwi31415926 8 months ago
He acts like he's an expert in astronomy, geology, oceanography, mathmatics. Evolution talks about fliping coins are you fucking high?
crockoduckevolved 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He's averaging over 2 lies per minute...not too shabby.
MrFungus420 9 months ago
Averaging over 2 lies per minute...not too shabby.
MrFungus420 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Averaging over 2 lies per minute...not too shabby.
MrFungus420 9 months ago
Averaging more than 2 lies per minute...not too shabby.
MrFungus420 9 months ago
Its awesome how people will deny evolution but still go to the doctors when they are sick.....Evolution is the back bone of much of medical sceince and biology
shandcunt 9 months ago
Well who is "they"? because it seems you were taught by kent hovind! not a single scientist teaches anything like that. You have just shown an unbelievably gross misunderstanding of evolution. Just as you misunderstood the difference between the slowing rate of the earth's rotation and the way we keep time records (another mistake of kent hovind funnily enough).
groundsman 9 months ago
I can't get enough of these creationist comedians.
dpaanlka 9 months ago
The earth has slowed 0.2 milliseconds in 190 years. The reason for the leap-second (or 0.9 seconds to be precise) is because the yearly clock does not perfectly match the single orbit.
I don't know if I should even bother having a go at the rest this nonsense, since people like on of the guys below me think evolution means an elephant can just turn into a manatee. I have never heard anything so stupid.
groundsman 9 months ago
@groundsman Actually make that 2 milliseconds in 190 years. Still a long way off from 1 second a year!
groundsman 9 months ago
Ok, we do not have to look into space to see how old our own planet is. I will throw out all the evidence regarding fossils, and geology dating this planet in the billions. The bible says it was created 4000 years ago? Read below:
"Methuselah" was 4,789 years old when sampled in 1957 by Edmund Schulman and Tom Harlan, with estimated germination 2832 BC. Methuselah is the oldest known living tree and non-clonal organism in the world—4,842 years old as of 2011.
skywize 10 months ago
Why does ACTUAL evidence bother you knuckleheads? What is your evidence - that an elephant became a manatee and the other things evolution teaches that can't be proven? Evolution is pseudo-science adn a waste of time.
thesacredcowtipper 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thesacredcowtipper It doesn't, because all of the actual evidence supports an old earth and evolution exclusively.
'that an elephant became a manatee'
Strawman
'the other things evolution teaches that can't be proven'
such as?
'Evolution is pseudo-science adn a waste of time. '
see; Projection.
TheScienceFoundation 10 months ago
@thesacredcowtipper You think evolution teaches that an elephant can just become a manatee. You are trying to argue against something about which you are hopelessly ignorant
groundsman 9 months ago
@groundsman They teach it. I'm not the one teaching it. I think it is hilarious along with many other things they teach. Palaeontologists believe that they now have 99.5% of all the fossils they are ever going to find. Every species has millions of missing links so macro evolution will always be a NON-PROVEN theory. Until we see it actually happen, it is just wating tax-payer dollars.
thesacredcowtipper 9 months ago
Pseudo science, the ultimate weapon of creatards.
OldSchoolSkill 10 months ago
Ok... a relatively ignorant person such as me, will take up the glub.
-Saturn ring distortion.... meteors and asteroids can disrupt them, then likely having no atmosphere to sheild them get banged once in a while, maybe.
-Asteroid belt sorting. Why should the rock be separated? Dosnt that shit revolve around the sun as well?
-Space dust, like you can tell the difference from the normal dust.
-Trees in the earth, fossilized trees would, and depending on place, it can pile up 1cm per year.
Woodsyone 10 months ago
-Magnetic field..... it dosnt always decrease in power. It just started to lately, since the poles are shifting, or prepareing to do that. Or maybe the core of Earth, is just doing to stop rotating and generating that field.... it will eventually, though likely wont in the next 200 or 1000 years. Dont know.
- Earth slowing down 1sec a year..... even if thats true, it dosnt mean it was spinning real fast at the start. And no people wouldnt be tossed of the equator, even if it would spin fast.
Woodsyone 10 months ago
But maybe its just that 60sek based clocks are inaccurate, and it should be 60,5 seconds.
So it gets shifted every now and then. If your not just making that up.
-Saltier ocean.... aint it the opposite, with that polar caps melting and all.
And we dont even know all that much about the ocean bottom. Besides, it aint a puddle of salty water thats still, waves at the top are just eye candy, there are plenty of currents in the sea aswell, to wash all that away + little creatures that eat stuff.
Woodsyone 10 months ago
-No river is running 4billion years. Even 1 billion years ago the earth surface, was quite different from what it is now.
-Helium... wtf? When this place came to be, it got its share of He, from getgo.
-DNA natural occurrence, impossible.... chance of 1*10(in40k power) is not impossible. 0 is impossible.
If there is a chance of something happening, its only a matter of time before it does.
And how many times do atoms bounce around in one second? A whole lot id say.
Woodsyone 10 months ago
A magical, all powerful, all knowing, omni present, jewish zomby who fathered himself in the future, went back in time, and made everything in a week, then took a rest (well even allpowerful get tired), then made man, in his image, (which seems quite flawed) to subjugate every life form out there, and those who hadnt heard of the creator, and women.
And now takes pleasure in peeping on everyone to find out who to send to eternal torment, yet loves everyone.
Now that seems more impossible.
Woodsyone 10 months ago
Or atleast i hope its not true. Being born in to a universe created by a schizophrenic, paranoid, narcissistic, sadistic, bisexual sociopath, who happens to unconditionally love everyone at the same time.
With unlimited power.....
Holy shit, amen, hallelujah and peanuts-butter.
Woodsyone 10 months ago
The ignorance... it hurts...
AppleMaster1 11 months ago
Classical creationist tactic: cram as many lies and fallacies into six minutes as you can so that anyone who would like to correct their information as no clue where to start, because every single sentence was just wrong. I mean, seriously 'no evidence that the Mississippi has been running for billions of years' -- that's because it hasn't! Maybe in the tens of millions of years. I'd have to look that up.
MultiPaulinator 11 months ago
He tells this shit to kids......? No wonder the science understanding is so low in the United States compared to the rest of the world.
Nick7690 11 months ago
GREAT VID - I got a big laugh from it. The manure coming out of your mouth could
fertilize America for decades to come :)
LoopQuantumGravity1 1 year ago
GREAT VID - I got a big laugh from it. The manure coming out of your mouth could
fertilize America for decades to come :)
LoopQuantumGravity1 1 year ago
epic fail
mcmadbat3 1 year ago
Well then, allow me to rate this as a huge thumbs down.
BarbarosaAlexander 1 year ago
Whenever ratings are disabled. You can bet it's a video from someone not interested in the truth.
hockeyjester12 1 year ago
"[no space dust] in the geological column" - Somebody tell this guy to Wiki the K-T Boundary.
StevenBee2 1 year ago
NASA scientists were "distressed"? WTF? Does he figure that all astronomers are part of a secret conspiracy to prove the bible wrong? Dammit, the reason those spacecraft were sent out were to find the truth, not hope that reality matched some pre-conceived notion... why spend billions sending them out in the first place? Why teach scientists for a decade or so in University about math, logic, and infuse them with a desire for understanding? what a ridiculous view this man has of the world.
StevenBee2 1 year ago
Rediculous conclusion.
MrJohnnyrace 1 year ago
Oh oh I've got one. "Hey i can prove the Bible with science! It rained half an inch today. It also rained half an inch yesterday. This proves that the earth must be 10,000 years old or else the oceans would be higher than the highest mountain!"
Maybe he'll use that in his next video.
spazmat2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Place your classify we offer you naughty women benaughtyman.info
kasunikaanjana 1 year ago
The word is "exponential", not "expodential", idiot. ~2:15
They found a guy stupider than Beck.
SuperScaramanga 1 year ago
How is this radom assembly of words proof?
The earth is slowing down a second a year? WHAHAHAHAHA This guy hurts my brain. He would fail any cause and effect test.
ailidhe 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is your lucky day with naughty hot chicks mworld5.info
LisesiHeath 1 year ago
This guy is insane.
csadler 1 year ago
It is a sin to use knowledge and observable evidence to justify your arguments. Remember that it was the Serpent who tempted us to eat of the Tree of Knowledge and God who warned us not to. It was Satan who asked Jesus for demonstrable proof that he could perform miracles and Doubting Thomas who sinfully asked for visible proof of Jesus' resurrection. It was Satan who put the fossils in the rocks to get us to believe in evolution and it is Satan who creates the images we see through telescopes.
EqualAndFree 1 year ago
@EqualAndFree Satan also created the internet... run for your life and hide under your rock!
rabidsi 1 year ago
@rabidsi And abandon agriculture and clothes. I think the Eden story said that they were Satan's fault too.
EqualAndFree 1 year ago
@EqualAndFree Yep. Real shame creationists don't have the balls to follow through on rejecting modern science... they'd naturally die out thanks to a lack of food, shelter and medicine. I might even be forced to shed a tear.
rabidsi 1 year ago
Creationists, themselves are proof of evolution.
they are the ones, dumb enough to beleive this stuff, they must be the people yet to have evolved. (or atleast yet to die out)
solution: kill creationists and help the human species ;)
TheAttackRat 1 year ago
This is some scary shit. He can't really believe what he is saying!!!!! right???
MrXX11XX22XX33 1 year ago
What a fucking non-argument!
AnEnglishGamer 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
World s no 1 Russian women dating site here gettop5.info
RileyDarlem 1 year ago
Each layer is full of dust.
Supposed millions of years, no they don't say that.
The poles flip, used with sea floor spreading it proved plate techtonics over millions of years.
gregrutz 1 year ago
Another creationist video that has the ratings disabled. What a shocker. And yes, some people do believe this C#ap. Worrying isn't it.
AstarothDeathSquirre 1 year ago
The atheists ultimate weapon is the Vortex cannon ! Is soo big we diguised it as an oil pipeline , clever huh . Polystrate fossils , ohh geez, read a book . Earths magnetic field changes strength , and reverses, changes position of the poles over time. Its a generated field , not a slowly weakening bar magnet. 150 years is not a lot of time. If you project back far enough Earth would be pulling all iron in the solar system to itself, we know a lot about previous field strengths from rocks.
SqueakerAlpha 1 year ago
Is he real? Seriously, is there really people who belives this? xD
satyrphetamine 1 year ago
Madness. Just madness . . .
irisheye801 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Online Be Naughty women benaughtyman.info
haritadilani 1 year ago
Well at least they dont want to destroy science!!
THE DAY ANY FUCKER START DESTROYING SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS IS THE DAY THAT I AM GONA GO OUT, GRAB SOME GRANADES AND START KILLING ALL FUCKIN MOTHER FUCKER ANTI-SCIENCE PENDEJO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 DE MIERDA CULEROS!!!
Alexsuper15 1 year ago
Science may be the atheists ultimate weapon, but us young earth creationists have been crafting our own religious ICBM in this logical arms race: the banana.
scourfish 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Naughty women in the lane benaughtyman.info
yasodagangani 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Kind Russian girls for marriage gettop5.info
IsabjCobhy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Marginal value naughty ladies here ***mworld5.info***
ValeriaWenda 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Meet Sexy Girls in Your Area busizz4me.info
bolgendolki 1 year ago
Why do Creationists still say evolution is about random chance when they are told over and over that it is not?
gupsphoo 1 year ago
The earth was spinning so fast it was possibly throwing folks off the equator?
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
killerbud420247 1 year ago
is this sunday school science? would kids belive this?
number6z 1 year ago
This guy is a huge idiot. Obviously has no idea what the fuck plate tech-tonics are, and how earth is an active planet with an active core that recycles itself via convection, bringing in the outer layers of earth in, and reshaping itself.
And what the fuck was the whole speel about our main asteroid belt? How does it having irregular shapes and sizes of asteroids = young solar system?
and the whole idea of saying because saturns rings are perfect = young solar system is highly suspect.
nt03hamlin 1 year ago
Pseudo-science nonsense at it's finest, I really wouldn't know where to begin in showing this person how wrong they are. This is really just dishearteningly ignorant...
dookiecheez 1 year ago
carbon dating?
Christians get real
evolution does not even contradict your holy book
creationists mar the face of christianity and make the followers seem like idiotic rednecks.
Also - the hebrew word for 'day' means period of time. If you take the bible literally you will stone your daughter to death when she loses her virginity (outside marriage) and cut off your hands and pull out your eyes out if you lust over a woman. From an agnostic.
thinkbig56 1 year ago
CREATIONISM:
There are indications that the world is not as old as we are told. For instance, at the bottom of the world it says it was made in China. It is also made from a form of plastic rubber which was not around until 1943.
curriejean 1 year ago
I'm going to hazard a guess and say this video ISN'T satire?
Hope i'm wrong. This probably is THE worst creationist video ever.
pky49 1 year ago
WTF? You people really believe this ass hat?
atticusproductions1 1 year ago
Here's a though! Try investigating for yourself instead of just believing what you are told! Something tells me this man's audience has never done that. If they did, they probably wouldn't be in church anymore.
CamillaCalamity 1 year ago
Evolution theory is soooooooooo stupid...........it is dead dead dead........
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 how?
FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 1 year ago
@FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 The last time i looked dogs still produce dogs and cows still produce cows and humans still produce humans............Charles Darwin was a priest who came up with dumb theory and the idiots so called scientists want to believe it
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 did you pass highschool?
DemokritosAbdera 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 the only reason cows produce cow and dogs produce doge is because we say they do by definition. a dog gives birth to a living thing, then we change the definition of a dog so the new living thing can be a dog, then the process continues. it's only a dog because we allow it to be, it never has a chance to be. go back to high school.
FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 1 year ago
@FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 I did not know that too much Whisky can do all that.......Dogs still produce dogs............you cannot change that.............Evolution theory is nothing but trash............bye bye evolution dumb theory................hehhehehhe
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 define specie first of all. also, how much change would it take for there to be a new specie? you do realize that it's impossible to have a new specie unless we as humans call it a new one. the next time a dog give birth, it doesn't give birth to a dog unless we change the definition of dogs, and so on. so, what your point that dogs always gave birth to dogs?
FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Who tries to change dogs producing dogs? Do yourself a favour and find out what Evolution IS before you reject it, by implying that you think Evolution states that a dog gives birth to a bird or a fish, you show you haven't got the least bit of understanding of it. I was initially going to comment on how utterly stupid this video was, but your comment's stupidity actually took priority.
Evolution has overwhelming scientific evidence in its favour. It's never been disproven.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier I know what evolution is..........stupid theory with zero proof........Only stupid person believes in stupid theory.............hmmmmmmmmmm........It must be you................heheehhehehe
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 No you really don't know what it is, you were claiming that evolution is wrong becaues 'dogs produce dogs'. By saying that you're implying that goes against Evolution, which it doesn't in the slightest. No offence, well actually quite a bit of offence, intended but I think the scientists who came up with, and the current generation of scientists who overwhelmingly support, the theory are a lot more intelligent than you. Saying it has 0 proof is beyond ostrich-esque ignorance.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier I dare you to provide proof for the theory of evolution............go ahead we are all listenning........................
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Similarities between almost every lifeform on Earth, huge similarities between us and modern apes, we both lack the ability to make vitamin C which every other mammal can do, vestigial structures, the number of chromosomes for us and modern apes, the ability to trace a lot of lifeforms back to common ancestors, variation within species (e.g. different types of dogs), viruses becoming immune to antibiotics, pests becoming immune to pesticide, atavistic genes and noncoding DNA.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier Let me make this point about all that you said: So your proof that evolution is a fact is based on similarities that we see between every lifeform on earth. Can these similarities imply common creator?????............hmmmmm..........if this is your proof of evolution then I suggest you get your head examined cuz your proof is pure speculation. Cuz i see apes and humans have DNAs then apes are the ancestors of humans????.........PURE SPECULATION.......
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 It could imply a common creator but on its own is in no way evidence of it, how would apes be the ancestors of humans? Past does not follow present, ancestors come before the descendents. Similarities on its own would not be sufficient evidence for evolution, but (incase you didn't realise) I also listed 8 other points from two minutes of thinking that you failed to address. With them all, independently, pointing to the exact same conclusion we can declare Evolution a fact.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier I'm still waiting for the evidence for the dumb theory of evolution ........all your points are pure speculation..........I laughed regarding the vitamin C one............You are a master in Pure speculation............Zero evidence so far.........any others out there??????????
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 No actually, I'M still waiting for YOU to refute the points I gave you. My points are not pure speculation, these have all been observed within fossils, within microbiology or within your own eyes. Laughing at it is not refuting it, it just shows you don't know how to go about refuting it. How do you explain atavisms? Why are humans still occassionally born with tails? Do you deny that there are different types of cats and dogs? What about 98% of our DNA being noncoding?
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 The Vitamin C point is that humans and apes both lack the ability to make Vitamin C due to a gene responsible for making it being broken (in exactly the same way), no other mammal has that gene broken in that way. It shows that at some point our common ancestor had that broken gene (GULO) and both modern apes and humans diverged from that ancestor after that gene lost its function. Don't just laugh at this, debate me back, show me why you're laughing at it. Unless you can't?
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Also while we're talking about this, I'll expand evolution to cover non-evolution as well, do you believe in a young earth? As in the universe and the Earth were created 6,000 years ago?
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier I certainly believe in a young earth...........this idea of billion of years is just a way to hide behind evolution cuz it will sound even more stupid without that extra time.
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 You took 3 days to reply with this? Ah well, I'm guessing you've abandoned your 'evolution is a stupid theory' stance since you've stopped trying to refute it and basically just ignored what you couldn't answer. So now you say you're a YEC this makes it even easier for me, you couldn't refute evolution and now you're going to have to try to justify a 6,000 year old universe. Do you want to provide evidence for it first or shall I just get on with refutation?
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier You provided Zero evidence so far............what are you talking about???.............Big Zero so far....
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Actually I did, I provided evidence that you refused to acknowledge; if it's so flawed then why can't you refute it? You take the typical creationist stance, you don't know how to refute the evidence so you just ignore it and pretend the person putting it forward never said anything. Go back to my post and explain all of those observable occurances in nature and show how they couldn't possibly be evidence for Evolution. Just saying "that's stupid" shows nothing but ignorance.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier I dare you in front of all...........Give one evidence at a time and we'll see if you have any real evidence.................
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 You know what, I'm starting to get really sick of this. You're, either by purposeful trolling or through your own idiocy, wasting my time. You take days at a time to reply with one sentence that is always the same "Hurr, give me evidence hurr".
I give you evidence, you don't attempt at all to refute it and just immediately claim to falsify it without explaining how or why. I HAVE given you evidence, you've simply ignored it and refused to even acknowledge it.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier Give one evidence at a time and we discuss it............stop playing......one evidence at a time...................give your first and I will respond.............Can you understand that??????
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 I've already presented my first batch of evidence that you're yet to even try to refute, if you want then I'll copy and paste it again to bring it to the front and then you can deal with it in whichever way you like, one at a time or all in one go. Your choice. But atleast try to refute it otherwise you set your default position as having accepted the fact that you can't refute it, thereby terminally weakening your already unfounded position.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Similarities between almost every lifeform on Earth, huge similarities between us and modern apes, we both lack the ability to make vitamin C which every other mammal can do, vestigial structures, the number of chromosomes for us and modern apes, the ability to trace a lot of lifeforms back to common ancestors, variation within species (e.g. different types of dogs), viruses becoming immune to antibiotics, pests becoming immune to pesticide, atavistic genes and noncoding DNA.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier Similarities between almost every lifeform on Earth s not a proof of evolution since I can say it shows common designer or creator..........So we both speculationg.........i hope you got the point.
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 No, similarities on their own are not definitive proof of evolution. They're evidence in support of it, but only when combined with the dozens of other independent factors observed in nature do they actually become proof. The other independent factors being the ones you, once again, failed to address. I am not speculating, you are speculating in believing something that you can't see, hear, touch, feel or taste and then simply stating that a well established theory is false.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier Your first point is not a proof of evolution.............Give your next point and i will comment................So far I'm ahead............you said it is not a proof............Next point please
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Read what I said, they are not definitive proof ON THEIR OWN. They ARE still evidence of evolution, but scientifically are not conclusive enough to prove evolution occurs. You're still doing it, picking and choosing which of my points you respond to and which points you ignore based on your ability to answer them. What about the rest? Variation within species? Atavisms? Noncoding DNA? Viral immunities? Vestiges? Transitions? Impefections in nature?
How do you explain these?
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier I said one point at a time...........Why your brain cannot comprehend that????.............stop listing 10 points and asking for a debate.........I have time for one point at a time each day.............I pray that your brain finally understood that.........still No proof.............let me move to the second point which variation within the same kind........Variations within the same kind is certainly scientific and we observe that. But still within the same kind and no new kind.
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Ah, so you do admit to variation within species? Then like it or not, you've subliminally admitted that you accept evolution too.
Variation within species is due to slightly different genetics, those genes programming for longer snouts or different fur patterns etc. Those exact same gene variations multiply over millions of years to the point where the end organism is a different species to the one it started from. Variation is just a evolution at any one instant in time.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier Variations yes and within the same kind...........Big dog......small dog.....It is still a dog..........cuz of this you evolutionists go wild and assume sure one kind of animal can turn to another kind of animal.........NO PROOF on that amigo.,,,,,just pure speculation..............and now we come to natural selection......natural selection only selects, it does not create a new kind..........wake up evolutionists.......
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Ok, and do you admit that there are different kinds of animals? This should be pretty obvious. Look around, you see fish and birds. You must admit that life is different and that life is different to how life used to be in the fossils we dig up. Whether this is via evolution or God creating new life doesn't matter at this point, as long as you agree that life is different compared to how life was at some time in the past.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier You have to be specific..........What do you mean life was different???......give examples.............
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Oh come on, look at a skeleton of a dinosaur or of a pre-mesozoic animal like a Dimetrodon. Generally life has changed from reptile dominated to mammal dominated, animals have gotten much smaller and has become better adapted for the current environment. Time scales or forces resonsible don't matter at this point, as long as you agree that life observed in fossil form (past) is different to life observed in nature now.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier Can you prove and show all of us which animal turned into another animal.???..............is that what you're trying to show?????...............Can we repeat the process or we need millions or billions of years????..........I hope you are not back to pure speculations
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 I'm asking a very simple question which you seem to be needlessly dodging. Regardless of cause, divine or not; do you agree that life has changed since some point in the past? It's incredibly simple.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier I don't believe life has changed at all..............Sure you might ride a car now and not ride a horse...........and you might eat lousy food now instead of freshly cooked food...............you got the point???????????
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 No, you're talking about life-style- changes. If you're actually denying the fact that life its self has become altered throughout history then you're simply willfully ignorant in certain areas if it suits your faith. Look at fossils, then look at life now, then try to convince yourself life hasn't in some way changed.
If you can't accept that basic fact simply because it might end up questioning your faith then no wonder you want to believe evolution isn't true either.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier I keep asking for examples and you keep refusing to bring any...........Tell us I beg you how life itself became altered.............stop talking in general terms and give examples...............Let's all here learn from you.............GIVE EXAMPLESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS...........I love when evolutionists talk about fossils..............come on amigo give us examples and teach us.
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Have you never seen a skeleton of a dinosaur? What more do you need? Do you see any 5m tall reptiles walking around anymore? No.
Reptiles dominated the world previously, now mammals do. That's a huge shift in and of its self, but there are all kinds of animals in fossil form that are completely different to how we see life in our time. We don't see anything today that could resemble the Dinosaurs, the Pterosaurs, giant carnivorous whales, giant marine reptiles etc.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier Even if there was a shift that does not prove evolution. Where is the real proof?????????? do we see half monkey and half human????????..........I just cannot understand why you cannot see that...............all you are saying is cuz there was a shift then evolution must be true...........NO Pal.........no proof yet.
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 I've been asking you step by step questions.
- You admit that life has changed since some point in the past.
- You admit that variations in genetics cause differences in organisms.
- You admit those differences can be and are selected against.
You admit to the mechanism and the driving force of evolution and that something like it must have happened, but simply deny those stages being pieced together? You really don't know what you believe, think about it for just a second.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Again, back to the misunderstanding of evolution where you wrongly think it states that we should find hybrid organisms.
You're looking at nature through a manmade construct of species, nature doesn't recognise or adhere to these taxa, they're manmade ideas to describe our observations of differences in organisms. Evolution doesn't produce a 'half money/half man', it produces an ape which gradually shows more characteristics associated with humans observed with hindsight.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rvfharrier I quote "Evolution doesn't produce a 'half money/half man', it produces an ape which gradually shows more characteristics associated with humans observed with hindsight."............How do you know that????...........HOW HOW HOW????...........Where is your proof?????..........you are simply speculating.........Did you see an ape with human characteristics???.......Talk is cheap...........GIVE PROOF.......
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Why do you need me to be telling you all this? It shows you clearly haven't even bothered to do the research yourself, you claim to know about evolution and still be able to dismiss it but you've shown yourself over time to know only slightly more than nothing about it. No wonder you dismiss it if you refuse to even learn about it.
I'm gonna send you a link through PM, since youtube doesn't allow them. It's a page on the timeline of human evolution from talk origins.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rvfharrier I repeat and in front of all.............How do you know that evolution produces an ape which gradually shows more characteristics associated with humans observed with hindsight?......You refused to answer in ur last email.......I give you one more chance..........Answer if you dare................
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 How did I refuse to answer? I sent you a link that has all of the fossils and all of the 'missing links' you creationists love to rant about. We know because we've seen it, go to that website and look at the evidence. Honestly, if you need me to spoon feed you all of this because you're completely incapable of thinking for yourself and researching the facts, then no wonder you're religious.
"I can't think for myself about things, so I won't. I'll deny them."
It's pathetic.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@rvfharrier You cannot even answer a simple question.........You proved to all that this evolution theory is totally bankrupt. Maybe one day you will tell us and bring us the monkey with human characteristics..........Bye bye dead evolution theory.
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Finishing up... "In 2005, a peer-reviewed scientific journal published results of the tests. It turns out that chromosome 2, which is unique to the human lineage of evolution, emerged as a result of the head-to-head fusion of two ancestral chromosomes that remain separate in other primates. Three genetic indicators provide strong, if not conclusive, evidence of fusion. "
hondadrvr3 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Evolution doesn't say that. Do some reading, man. "Genome analysis reveals the genetic difference between humans and chimps to be less than 2 percent. In other words, humans and chimps have DNA sequences that are greater than 98 percent similar."
hondadrvr3 1 year ago
@hondadrvr3 ........That implies common designer............your evolution theory is simply dead with NO PROOF.......When are you going to show us a monkey with human characteristics????..............we all are waiting............I hope you don't say that it is you............hahahhahahah
democracyrules2000 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Your ignorance of what Evolution actually SAYS about our origin is astounding. You're under the impression that Evolution works like a ladder; one species turns into another as you ascend the rungs of the ladder. This is outright false. Evolution is best described as a tree. We share a COMMON ANCESTOR with apes. How difficult is that to comprehend? No one EVER said that a monkey turned into a human. Your argument is one of ignorance.
hondadrvr3 1 year ago
@hondadrvr3 I quote "Evolution is best described as a tree. We share a COMMON ANCESTOR with apes"........PURE Speculation...............keep dreaming with your ancestors the apes..........hehehehheheheh
democracyrules2000 11 months ago
@hondadrvr3 I wouldn't waste your time, your arguments are lost on this one. You are better off debating someone who is not intellectually challenged, good luck with that one.
darkskies11 11 months ago
@democracyrules2000 After evolution has produced a different species from the one it originated from, people like you then classify those two species as completely different. They look at the transitions from organism A to organism B and instead of noting a gradual step by step change from A to B in every single transition, they look at them and attribute characteristics from the final organism gained with hindsight and say 'A, A, A, A, A, B! This one is A and this one is B, missing link here!'
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Now let me ask if you acceot the idea of natural selection, the idea that organisms better adapted for the environment they're in are more likely to survive and live longer lives.
Is that a statement that you accept or reject?
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Either engage in a proper debate with me, whereby I provide evidence for my standpoint and you then proceed to defend yours (and then not even try to provide evidence for yours since there actually is none) through reasoning and logical explanations, or stop wasting my time. You're either a troll or just a moron, I just can't figure out which since you're likely doing a bit of both; one caused by the other.
You have one chance to actually debate me back, otherwise I'm done.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Just off the top of my head, so how do you explain all of that? Waiting for you to refute. Nevermind just the absurdity of the alternative, that the universe is 6000 years old? Refuting Young Earth Creationism doesn't prove Evolution (that was what the last post was for), but it shows your level of gullability and stubbornness that you'll believe YEC with all of its non-evidence (and plain absurdity) over Evolution with its wealth of evidence.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
@democracyrules2000 Tell me. How ignorant do you have to be, or how distant do you have to be from, I'm assuming, Christianity in forming your own zealous beliefs as to reject Evolution given that John Paul II (the last Pope) accepted Evolution as a fact and said that it was able to be taken hand in hand with religion? Evolution doesn't necessarily rule out God, I don't believe God does use Evolution to regulate life but atleast those that do are capable of looking at and accepting the evidence.
rvfharrier 1 year ago
This man is right, the earth had to be created, there is not way a Moron of such Caliber can be a pruduct of the evolutionary process.
Evolution try improve the average, and for a brain to come out with such poor capacity of logic there must be such a huge number of bad mutation that it will never survive.
Only a God can make an speciment like this.
We must pray that this man do no reproduce, because this seems to be a really bad see tha it may really put the human species in jeopardy.
JerezJulio 1 year ago
Comment removed
JerezJulio 1 year ago
Banded like spokes in a wheel, what a fucking retard last I checked a spoke radiates from the centre.
JamesThWilliams 1 year ago
only in America.
LuigiPeach 1 year ago
"We launched Voyager"? You were on the team? Somehow I doubt that. Nasa scientists usually got past 4th grade.
alfapint 1 year ago
What a load of crock. He's even got the shot of Saturn upside down...rather like Creationist arguments.
His 'mud deposits' have already been shown to be pyroclastic flows, not mud at all. And as for extrapolating the Earths magnetic field strength backwards ad infinitum, words fail me. Anyone with even a little knowledge of the subject knows we are due for a magnetic field reversal sometime in the next 2000 years...and that prior to every other such event the field strength drops...like now.
alfapint 1 year ago
what a load of steaming horse-shit.
breaneainn 1 year ago
This guy is seriously misinformed. He should give up his job and go back to working at fox news. His logic or at least the script that his religious leaders right for him, makes no sense at all. I rest calmly knowing that idoits like this are slowly being wiped out as the new generation is slowly gaining common sense about the world.
greyfox316 1 year ago
SPACE DUST?? FRIGGIN' SPACE DUST??! THROWING FOLKS OFF AT THE EQUATOR???! Who is this hammerhead? He learned just enough science to confuse idiots and piss off rational people.
jerico641 1 year ago
What a load of BS
SneakyG101 1 year ago
Full of false facts. Common people, google it. The rotation has slowed roughly only by 2 milliseconds since 1820. Earth's rotation at about 6.5 hours per day/night cycle, when it was created, 4.5 billion year.
duguder 1 year ago
disabled, wonder why. lol
I'll do it here THUMBS DOWN
Niveous23 1 year ago
Blah blah blah, take a scientific fact either out of context, or draw false conclusion based on misunderstanding, blah blah blah... yeah, this is a GREAT fucking video. I AM CONVINCED.
tml4873 1 year ago
Yes, creationists, the Mississippi River has been flowing for at least 4 billion years.
Freakin' wow.
This guy obviously has no buddies in serious scientific studies.
neonsilkworm 1 year ago
Comment removed
Belramous1 1 year ago
Earth back then had a range of differing conditions with a range of differing cocktails, eventually something clicked and had the oppertunity to spread until oxygen generatign life forms became prevalent enough that macro-organisms "Exploded" onto the scene.
Also, Sol ain't the only star with planets, the Milky Way ain't the only galaxy with stars with planets, and I doubt the Virgo Supercluster ain't the only supercluster with galaxies with stars with planets.
You have no case.
Psychotol 1 year ago
gaps in the rings: Dust bunches up.
Solar wind has a limited effect, you push something up without altering the orbital velocity, there will be no additional centripetal force and gravity will coutneract the force you're projecting.
Not a dense enough belt to cause things to bunch, Mars and Jupiter have a greater effect than other asteroids.
Tree grows through all that mud before dying, plants can live a long long time.
Your extrapolation of Earth's hysteresis takes no account of remanence.
Psychotol 1 year ago
What does he mean by "space dust"??
pubuman 1 year ago
@pubuman OMG space dust I wet myself :)
nocodad123 1 year ago