better than the original. you talk about the beatles, as if they were gods. there are good musicians. not only the beatles. this version is great. yeah
i love both bands oasis n phonics!!! if anythin im more into oasis but this tunes is much better than the oasis cover! kellys voice is the fuckin bollucks here!!
why does every1 think the originals are better? yes, it is the original song they are singin, but come on the phonics and u2's version is way better. well done the beatles for bringing it out, it doesnt mean it cant be matched or done better.
I think I've done enough homework, perhaps you should do your English homework to learn to spell? Although Ringo isn't a good technical player he still wrote some amazing songs and some of the best drum hooks and innovated dampened snares ect... have you played drums for 10 years? I have.
@jackofwack i dont come on here to argue with sad little boring freaks like you. unfortunately your little boring so called fact was wrong which you have just pretty much admitted yourself. my comment was a matter of opinion which cant be right or wrong. you must be a really boring person poiting out daft things like spelling. 10 yrs? so you mean you have bought a kids drum kit for xmas and you look up 2 ringo the artist? really boring and sad. whos your band by the way?
I'm a sad boring little freak? You're the one who attacked my opinion. I'm in a new band at the moment, only played covers before, I play lead guitar in it, it's called Violet Radar. If you want to see me play I've got some metal stuff on my channel (metallica covers) from nearly 2 years ago. You have a really adistic view point on other when really you're the one in ignorance. Ringo plays music, not technical drivel. I aspire to his song wrting ability, something you cant appreciate
@666rebels I'm sorry.............have you heard the beatles "helter skelter".of course it's better. jesus. let's not get daft. macca can out sing bono kelly and noel today, let alone back in 1968...............
@WILBURYCRUSH "macca" a better singer than kelly jones?? are you deaf??? how funny!! stop smoking crack. the beatles are class but as for a comment like that "wilbury" ! at least you have put a smile on my face today, that i thank you for. all the best "wilbury".
@666rebels Only someone with no real understanding of the history of popular music would fail to understand the debt owed by all modern rock bands to the beatles, without whom....................i could go on but maybe it would begin to resemble the flogging of a dead horse. By the way, i like the Stereophonics.....but i also know where they stand on the musical scale.
I'm listening to all the posted versions. This is the best one!! The closest to the original! The first heavy metal song ever!!!!! THE BEATLES! ALWAYS THEM!!!!...
well yeah, kelly is a proper rock singer, noel is awsome but just a singer. By somemeans i think this is better than the beatles original as this is more polished and just better.
The song really benefits here from modern amplification and recording techniques, while being faithful to the original, something U2 and Oasis were completely unable to do with their covers. This sounds like what Sir Paul was trying to achieve in 1968...
This is exactly how I'd imagine the way The Beatles original would sound if they had the production we have now. Best cover ever and the vocals are shit hot.
Check out Stereophonics with the black crowes on Jools Holland doing "Twice As Hard" (it is posted),unbelievable.Kelly and Chris have a one night stand on the mic and Jools lays some bad blues "Joanna" down as only he can.
Completely lose my shit to it every time i watch it.
This is not a cover, is a clone of the original. To do that, please, don't even bother to cover the song. Not that it's bad, actually it's excellent, but to listen to this I prefer to listen to the beatles' one...
These guys MUST be Beatles fans or at least major fans of this song. The attention to detail on this is incredible from the sound of the lead guitar, the musical backing, the lead vocal and the backing vocals. Well done Stereophonics.
i did not expect this version to be even good... and i admit it... it is absolutely great... i expected something similar from oasis, of course liam singing, but... these guys from stereophonics are really good... i like more oasis, but i like more this version
iv seen these guys live twice and going again in december this year...this guy can sing okay, nobody has a voice as good as that. Saw them in cardiff last year and he was utterly unbeliveable..he makes shouting and screaming very sexy
Martynfield..??? wat??! smoking does not give KJ his voice? jesus what planet are you frm? The guy was born with that voice, hence the reason he can sing anything- Rod stewart had a similar gravel to his voice 2...all natural...not cos he smokes!
kelly has admited though in a magazine interview he did use to smoke to hopefully make his voice sound more rough! i dnt kno if it did, but he did say he did smoke quite a lot only for that reason.
I was convinced before....but now I am THOROUGHLY CONVINCED that Kelly Jones can sing ANYTHING. He's a friggin genius. Just when I think he can't possibly ooze anymore talent...he goes and does something like this....I mean holy SHIT!!!!!!!! He is probably perfect. (Except he smokes...oh well)
yes yes yes but...the oasis version is live not recorded in a studio with 500 bloody edits made to it..this versions has proper production of course its gonna sound better..
Miles better than Oasis--this ROCKS. I still like the Banshees cover best though. Do check that out if you don't know it. I wanna hear Kelly do AC/DC Back in Black!
this is a mint cover i reckon like, true to the original and performed in a way that doesnt change ur opinion of stereophonics musical abilities. this IS better than the oasis cover
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Completely untrue. The Oasis cover of this is much better. You actually get the psychadelia out of it, this cover makes me think that someone told them to cover this rather than wanting to. You get the same with the 'phonics covering Gimme Shelter.
completely agree with that. oasis put much more psychadelia into it, this is just a bunch of blokes screaming down a mic. sounds a bit too heavy metal aswell.
The song was heavy have you even heard the original it was screming into a mike. I love Oasis and there cover but this one does the original more justice
this is a class cover. kelly has nailed the vocals better than any other cover of this legendary song. this song needs to be played like the authentic classic. if it ain't, well in my own opinion, it's pretty poor (not saying that Oasis's one was) but they sound like plastic fakes of the song yknow?
Great cover.
Sandler41882 3 weeks ago
this is the best version
stereophonicsful 3 weeks ago
Siouxsie's is the best, very different from every version!!
GabloFX2 2 months ago
that scream @3:33 sends shivers down my spine....
adsyoffinch 3 months ago
GREAT COVER. AND YEAH THE BEATLES ARE GODS. MISS THEM MISS THEM... FANS WILL UNDERSTAND THE LAST PART
RAPSODIAROCK 3 months ago
Sounds good, now write your own music that sounds this good.
lastlane 4 months ago
better than the original. you talk about the beatles, as if they were gods. there are good musicians. not only the beatles. this version is great. yeah
SuperFieldsofgold 4 months ago in playlist YouTube Mix for Stereophonics
i love the Stereophonic, but i'm not feeling Kelly's vocal :/
fede018 4 months ago
kellys voice makes this awesome :)
15cjm 6 months ago in playlist songgs
love kelly covers
MartimRockass 7 months ago
This is a pretty good cover!
Mcfishmeister 7 months ago
Too much humbuckers for me but it's a good cover though! (:
JoostBeersMusic 7 months ago
i love both bands oasis n phonics!!! if anythin im more into oasis but this tunes is much better than the oasis cover! kellys voice is the fuckin bollucks here!!
cardiffcrewsoul2000 7 months ago
this wins over oasis's cover, but both bands are great
xXxgeegee1234xXx 8 months ago
In my opinion i like this more than the original - Dont hate me ! haha XD
brannighan212 8 months ago 2
The guitar work is better than Oasis' cover. They're both up there though and its hard to say which is better cos they're both top
cashforchaos 8 months ago
@MikeLovesChoppers they would say "fuck this shit. we can write music without the help of technology. all we need is lsd and an indian spirit guru"
Rocker342 10 months ago 2
This one's like Oasis cover... But the singing is great
RedLioness8 11 months ago
@RedLioness8 Actually, they both have the same influences, and they play the same rock'n'roll
Of course it does sound the same ^^
cyyytr0n 11 months ago
I just can't get that first scream out...
keyblok 1 year ago
quality!!
ROBBIE51123 1 year ago
why does every1 think the originals are better? yes, it is the original song they are singin, but come on the phonics and u2's version is way better. well done the beatles for bringing it out, it doesnt mean it cant be matched or done better.
666rebels 1 year ago
@666rebels U2s version is totally lame!
djangolad 1 year ago 5
@666rebels Probably because the beatles have the four masterminds of music wheras the phonics and u2 don't?
jackofwack 1 year ago
@jackofwack ringo star?? mastermind???? do your homework b4 writing daft things like that.
666rebels 1 year ago
@666rebels
I think I've done enough homework, perhaps you should do your English homework to learn to spell? Although Ringo isn't a good technical player he still wrote some amazing songs and some of the best drum hooks and innovated dampened snares ect... have you played drums for 10 years? I have.
jackofwack 1 year ago
@jackofwack i dont come on here to argue with sad little boring freaks like you. unfortunately your little boring so called fact was wrong which you have just pretty much admitted yourself. my comment was a matter of opinion which cant be right or wrong. you must be a really boring person poiting out daft things like spelling. 10 yrs? so you mean you have bought a kids drum kit for xmas and you look up 2 ringo the artist? really boring and sad. whos your band by the way?
666rebels 1 year ago
@666rebels
I'm a sad boring little freak? You're the one who attacked my opinion. I'm in a new band at the moment, only played covers before, I play lead guitar in it, it's called Violet Radar. If you want to see me play I've got some metal stuff on my channel (metallica covers) from nearly 2 years ago. You have a really adistic view point on other when really you're the one in ignorance. Ringo plays music, not technical drivel. I aspire to his song wrting ability, something you cant appreciate
jackofwack 1 year ago
@666rebels I'm sorry.............have you heard the beatles "helter skelter".of course it's better. jesus. let's not get daft. macca can out sing bono kelly and noel today, let alone back in 1968...............
WILBURYCRUSH 11 months ago
@WILBURYCRUSH "macca" a better singer than kelly jones?? are you deaf??? how funny!! stop smoking crack. the beatles are class but as for a comment like that "wilbury" ! at least you have put a smile on my face today, that i thank you for. all the best "wilbury".
666rebels 11 months ago
@666rebels Only someone with no real understanding of the history of popular music would fail to understand the debt owed by all modern rock bands to the beatles, without whom....................i could go on but maybe it would begin to resemble the flogging of a dead horse. By the way, i like the Stereophonics.....but i also know where they stand on the musical scale.
WILBURYCRUSH 11 months ago
I think Kelly has the best voice for this cover!! brilliant song and he's made it even more entertaining!!
foxybronwina 1 year ago
i love the beatles and i love stereophonics.......but which one is best ? well i just can't choose !
kellyseyebrows 1 year ago
I love how u can't even hear the bass...
JohnFuent3s 1 year ago
I tend not to like it when bands sing Beatles songs...but this cover is just amazing..great voice, breathtaking instruments!
erika121071 1 year ago
wow i saw all covers on youtube ( U2, Bon jovi, the killers...)... this one is the best by far
pretoclan 1 year ago
wow
pretoclan 1 year ago
i know about 3/4 of these viewers will disagree with me but i honestly, think this is better than the beatles version. ♥stereophonics♥ are ♥amazing♥
thomasdrocker12 1 year ago 4
buen cover,la voz me recuerda en algo a la de Kurt Cobain...buena eh!!buen tema!!!
lito130483 1 year ago
good very good,band!!
russinroll 1 year ago
I'm listening to all the posted versions. This is the best one!! The closest to the original! The first heavy metal song ever!!!!! THE BEATLES! ALWAYS THEM!!!!...
Ariosvaldo670 1 year ago
Nice ! kick ass voice
aleccmusic 1 year ago
I do enjoy this cover...
lika187 1 year ago
Aerosmith did the best cover of helter skelter
MrPeterGroove 1 year ago
excelente cover :D
beatlesmusica 1 year ago
Better than the oasis but oasis are better alll round
arturborucfan 1 year ago
closed from beatles version, excellent
olivier92160 2 years ago
Comment removed
JohnAsh16 2 years ago
They sound like the Beetles and Jet had a baby. sweet! :D
Losers0fTomorrow 2 years ago 5
@Losers0fTomorrow Hell yeah!
leeroysnowneger 1 year ago
Of course the original is better!!! But come on, this is an amazing cover :) Kelly can sing anything! this guys are amazing.
I would hate it if they changed the style of the song..they were just having some fun ;)
k0oksoa 2 years ago 44
@k0oksoa fucking agree, love this.
phonicsfan1 1 year ago
I love both Oasis and Stereophonics but I think Kelly covers this song better then Noel if i'm honest.
KonohaRamenNoodles 2 years ago 29
well yeah, kelly is a proper rock singer, noel is awsome but just a singer. By somemeans i think this is better than the beatles original as this is more polished and just better.
bristolcityrocc 2 years ago 5
@KonohaRamenNoodles This cover is fantastic. Oasis's cover is sloppy, at best.
MarvelNut 1 year ago
@KonohaRamenNoodles Kelly's voice is more rough than Noel's ;) so indeed, it sounds better, but the oasis' cover ain't bad too :P
cyyytr0n 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
where can i find this
BillyBurstInFlames 2 years ago
Great cover, favourited.
The song really benefits here from modern amplification and recording techniques, while being faithful to the original, something U2 and Oasis were completely unable to do with their covers. This sounds like what Sir Paul was trying to achieve in 1968...
stuckontheupslow 2 years ago 9
fukin brilliant ,,what a voice that man as got ,,,yaaaaaaaaaaa
massivetime1 2 years ago
this version gave me chills!! AMAZING!
lukefreo20 2 years ago 3
im stunned :O
zapista21 2 years ago
I'm not a big fan of Stereophonics but I gotta admit they put all their heart in this cover, it sounds perfect
AFirmKickInThePants 2 years ago 3
Wow, he can hit the notes.
pobhockle 2 years ago 3
I think this is the best version of the song
keane06 2 years ago 3
it sounds amazing for a cover, but OF COURSE the original is better. if this was better, then it would basically be like making a new song.
RainbowPasghetti 2 years ago
I'm a huge fan of the original, but this is a great cover version. Also like Kelly doing Revolution & I'm Only Sleeping.
clowninamicrowave 2 years ago 3
This is exactly how I'd imagine the way The Beatles original would sound if they had the production we have now. Best cover ever and the vocals are shit hot.
**5 stars, 10/10, A++, Gold Star**
admanphoto 2 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
There has been much dispute over what version of this song is superior. This is my ranking, and it can't be disputed... wah wah waaaah
1- The Beatles (Duh)
2- Siouxsie And The Banshees (If you look up Helter Skelter, this version, with out a doubt, meets the definition)
3- Motley Crue (Mostly because they distorted it, making it a little more "Heltery")
4- Aerosmith (Music's great, but this version seems like Steven Tyler showboating)
KalosGun 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
5- Stereophonics (Now we're getting a little structured here, which is the opposite of what the song's about)
6- VOW WOW (Again, CRAZY version of the song. Singer is awful, though)
7- U2 (Definitely too structured, and Bono IS showboating, but it's better than...)
8- Oasis (Ugh! That makes TWO Beatles songs they've mucked up)
9- Jamie Winchester (Sorry, it's the safest version of all... a little too clean)
10- Mine (Ever heard it? Probably never will.)
KalosGun 2 years ago
wow this cover is just awesome!!!!
elementx20jr 2 years ago 3
origional is better...
flackenstien 2 years ago
of course it is but this is still a great cover you have to admit
elementx20jr 2 years ago 3
sounds like jet i really like it
raulishoogallagher 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
who the fuck are The Bealtes?
kasperlasper 2 years ago
HAHAHAHAHA
bwylde27 2 years ago 3
i think nobody knows The BeaLtes!
about The Beatles, guess what!?!? "Tell me tell me tell me the answer....you may be a lover but you ain't no dancer!!!!!!!!!!!"
Osmozziss 2 years ago
great cover
woozy11285 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Karaoke for the brain-dead and terminally stupid.
Classic turned into turgid shit by a wanker.
h0gg0 2 years ago
this guy sings very very well!
bartellius 2 years ago 2
The greatest cover of this song
teddyrata 2 years ago 4
if this is true.. the origional is still better
flackenstien 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no it's not.
kryl4egfromhell 2 years ago
roflmao.. the origional is better.. you do know the irigional is by The Beatles right?
flackenstien 2 years ago 5
OMG i went to a bottle of the bands last night and there was this band. They did and AWESOME AWEOSME cover of this song.
The band was 'in circles'.
Lead singer(girl)/ guitarist
bassist(boy)
drummer(girl)
THEY WERE AWESOME!!
just thought i might share that
xgirlx405 2 years ago
wow fuckin great
riff88m 2 years ago
oh this is great!! probabily the best cover of helter skelter that ive heared
fercax 2 years ago 2
Alright - not enough balls.
bleo34 2 years ago
shut up
savaloydrunkard 2 years ago
Check out Stereophonics with the black crowes on Jools Holland doing "Twice As Hard" (it is posted),unbelievable.Kelly and Chris have a one night stand on the mic and Jools lays some bad blues "Joanna" down as only he can.
Completely lose my shit to it every time i watch it.
GrantStoke 2 years ago
This is not a cover, is a clone of the original. To do that, please, don't even bother to cover the song. Not that it's bad, actually it's excellent, but to listen to this I prefer to listen to the beatles' one...
PepMoix 2 years ago
It's a cover..
savaloydrunkard 2 years ago
a lot better than oasis' one
jamjamjamsession 2 years ago 4
this is just.. excelent
LordEizen 2 years ago
teally a cool voice, mate.
slim22rj 2 years ago
the attention to detail in this version is unreal!!
Adzer427 2 years ago 4
This is Rock and Roll! Can't wait for their new stuff this year
Jbhoy88 2 years ago 4
Sounds good, but I think I prefer the Aerosmith version.
dudeinanelevator 3 years ago
shit!! cool voice i wish i could sing like that.. >=D
LordEizen 3 years ago 4
These guys MUST be Beatles fans or at least major fans of this song. The attention to detail on this is incredible from the sound of the lead guitar, the musical backing, the lead vocal and the backing vocals. Well done Stereophonics.
Mr6292 3 years ago 3
if i was to cover this song, it wouldnt sound anything like the o.g
they wrote the song to sound as violent and loud as possible. if i was to do it, itd be a little more death metal.
byronmblack 3 years ago
and thats why your not doing it cos it would sound awful!!!
garcia433 3 years ago 8
Comment removed
byronmblack 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
yeah no shit dickfuck
byronmblack 3 years ago
Comment removed
3pairsofunderwear 2 years ago
i did not expect this version to be even good... and i admit it... it is absolutely great... i expected something similar from oasis, of course liam singing, but... these guys from stereophonics are really good... i like more oasis, but i like more this version
caguaman2k 3 years ago 3
iv seen these guys live twice and going again in december this year...this guy can sing okay, nobody has a voice as good as that. Saw them in cardiff last year and he was utterly unbeliveable..he makes shouting and screaming very sexy
c2phonics 3 years ago
Martynfield..??? wat??! smoking does not give KJ his voice? jesus what planet are you frm? The guy was born with that voice, hence the reason he can sing anything- Rod stewart had a similar gravel to his voice 2...all natural...not cos he smokes!
c2phonics 3 years ago
kelly has admited though in a magazine interview he did use to smoke to hopefully make his voice sound more rough! i dnt kno if it did, but he did say he did smoke quite a lot only for that reason.
garcia433 3 years ago 3
well the smoking certainly worked...
nwLohmann 3 years ago 7
I was convinced before....but now I am THOROUGHLY CONVINCED that Kelly Jones can sing ANYTHING. He's a friggin genius. Just when I think he can't possibly ooze anymore talent...he goes and does something like this....I mean holy SHIT!!!!!!!! He is probably perfect. (Except he smokes...oh well)
ambientkitty 3 years ago
yh but smoking gives his voice that ruff edge so i suppose its not all bad
MartynField 3 years ago
I guess you're right....never thought about it that way......like I said...oh well!
ambientkitty 3 years ago
Beatles obviously did it the best but this is my favourite cover, the intro/screaming bit was great.
DCDx89 3 years ago 2
Yea I agree, I've listened to U2, Motley Crue and Oasis but this version is my favourite, probably because it's so close to the original
andotoldo 3 years ago
This is the best Helter Skelter cover i've heard, It has energy, Kelly screams it just like Macca did.
beatleandy1 3 years ago
Hell yeah he did! :D
BPMontana 3 years ago
Good version- then again have they ever done a bad cover version..............I cant think of one.
Mr Jones has one of the best Voices around
notti500 3 years ago
Stereophonics/Oasis - both great bands, both great covers of the song
IKilledElviss 3 years ago 3
Very good version!
TheSkelters 3 years ago 3
Keep doing what you do Stereophonics!
Great Cover!
xXokcoolXx 3 years ago 4
yes yes yes but...the oasis version is live not recorded in a studio with 500 bloody edits made to it..this versions has proper production of course its gonna sound better..
JcjR1988 3 years ago
It sounds better because kelly is a better singer than liam, i've seen both 4 times.....No contest!
deanBORO 3 years ago
I meant noel, he can sing better than them both to be fair.
deanBORO 3 years ago
the boys rocking out like usual. Good shit all round.
s4099274 3 years ago 3
This is a pretty good cover actually, Oasis doesn´t even come close...
MsPrettyPunk82 3 years ago 4
Brill, this is better than Oasis version (its nothing personal I luv Oasis) but Kelly has a better voice that Noel for this kind of song!!!
myworld06 3 years ago 8
they'v also done a good cover of hot chocholate's sexy thing
welshdragonia 3 years ago 4
Great version!!!
Mikeg73070 3 years ago 6
TOTAL KICKASS
rodrigolfernandes 3 years ago 3
His voice is perfect for this song..much better than Noel Gallagher's version!
Tlzmaniac 3 years ago 14
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Noone is a better singer than Noel Gallagher. Except Liam Gallagher
hrhadam 3 years ago
Great cover!!! :D
ManuZombie 3 years ago
Loving it
doon2110 3 years ago
woooo 10,000 view :D
Davidls2 3 years ago
I thought the Oasis cover was quality - I'm surprised to say, this is better. the vocal sounds a lot more like the original
Jondoms123 3 years ago 6
Soundgarden's version is the best. Totally reworked the song.
artisthespoonman 3 years ago
It's not the best. But for you personally, perhaps. I must say, i like theirs best too. But it remains just an opinion.
Chrotisofus 3 years ago
they do the best covers. best of you, don't let me down, n this, helter skelter. beautiful
jethron5000 3 years ago
Never heard these do a bad cover yet! AMAZING!
deanBORO 3 years ago 4
The best cover of this song that I've ever heard.
D4Vl7 3 years ago 4
This is one of those few Beatles songs where the covers seem to be better than the original. Great song tho.
Yetisly 3 years ago
Much more crude version than Oasis´
Much more true to the original.
Helter Skelter isnt a particularly musical song, its Paul singing nonsense lyrics into a mic with strong riffs.
Its brilliant though.
And this cover respects all of its raw brilliance.
vogue4u 3 years ago
during the last few seconds of the song i had a feeling he was goin to scream "I GOT BLISTERS ON MY FINGERS!" why didnt he?
GerlovesCami 3 years ago
This is an awesome version! Really nails the feel of the original, I think. Really manic and kinda everywhere.
MovingThroughKashmir 3 years ago
Way Better Then The Oasis Version and Kelly's Vocals Are Incredible!
Jacd92 3 years ago 3
much better than the Oasis version that is the worst version, i think this is better than The Beatles version despite the fact they wrote it.
winta1991 3 years ago
oasis version is the best one....
sayshu666 3 years ago
this is very good
marcelovialino 3 years ago
Miles better than Oasis--this ROCKS. I still like the Banshees cover best though. Do check that out if you don't know it. I wanna hear Kelly do AC/DC Back in Black!
showmerightnow 3 years ago
this is a mint cover i reckon like, true to the original and performed in a way that doesnt change ur opinion of stereophonics musical abilities. this IS better than the oasis cover
pedrothechimp 4 years ago 2
wwooooohooo
ComaRadio 4 years ago
the oasis cover is the worst...nothing more than a pub band the public throw their money at........sad.
desmondstreet 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Completely untrue. The Oasis cover of this is much better. You actually get the psychadelia out of it, this cover makes me think that someone told them to cover this rather than wanting to. You get the same with the 'phonics covering Gimme Shelter.
vitalogy 4 years ago
completely agree with that. oasis put much more psychadelia into it, this is just a bunch of blokes screaming down a mic. sounds a bit too heavy metal aswell.
avelandpunk 3 years ago
The song was heavy have you even heard the original it was screming into a mike. I love Oasis and there cover but this one does the original more justice
Dntexerville 3 years ago 2
No Idea pal.... The Oasis version was awesome. Real Psycadelia and feeling.
superfly1001978 3 years ago
PAUL WAS THE WALRUS!!!!! XD
musacluver 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
These guys are awesome! Are they new?
cholowoo 4 years ago
no they have been going for about 10 yrs
ecorfield 4 years ago
Where have you been? Your missing out on a bloody brilliant band.
brokenboykayaker 4 years ago 2
:p lol
lordsabber 4 years ago
no theyve been around since the 90's
spongeBoNg42oh 4 years ago
Bloody brilliant!!!
joshuorgz 4 years ago
best cover i've heard the others being oasis which is decent and the one by U2 which is bloody terrible
moosebyte2007 4 years ago
Not bad,but the motley crue version is better and the phonics rox tbh :D
jizzdawg 4 years ago
this is definitely the most energetic one
livpsu 4 years ago
great
lordsabber 4 years ago
this is a class cover. kelly has nailed the vocals better than any other cover of this legendary song. this song needs to be played like the authentic classic. if it ain't, well in my own opinion, it's pretty poor (not saying that Oasis's one was) but they sound like plastic fakes of the song yknow?
themuselover 4 years ago 3
its a good cover.. but it is too much like the beatles... they dont do the song in their own style. oasis does
JordiHagens 4 years ago
awesome vocals... when Kelly push the pedals...no one can compare to him!
lattediluna 4 years ago 4
easily the best cover of this song. Makes lil Oasis effort look really feeble.
Madrupert 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
great cover..
but "better than OASIS" ???
NO!
champagnedsupernova 4 years ago
Amazing vocals by Mr Kelly Jones!!
JulieC48 4 years ago 5
very good cover !!!
better than "helter skelter" by oasis.
stephba 4 years ago 3