Press TV/News Analysis/Irans nuclear program/11/28/2009

[cawoxasan]

iran has right to have enerygy

[TheDemonsoldier]

i am really sorry about my language but f** western country and us

[needbailout]

Although the Bush administration denied it, the conventional wisdom on the part of the anti-war movement was that the war on Iraq was launched in order for the US to take

[needbailout]

over Saddam's oil supplies which would give Washington an even more dominant position in the region. That there was no concrete evidence that the war was supported by the oil companies was discounted and, as it had been in 1991 during the first Gulf War, "No blood for oil!" became the battle cry. If the war was indeed about oil, then, as the New York Times reported on Friday, the US lost. "If true," writes the Times' Rod Nordland. "then the war failed in more ways than some critics charge."