this is the problem..Yes we are indian first then hindu..ask the same question to a fellow muslim....He will open your eyes to tell you that he is muslim first then indian
@DESIINNY all indians are linked to hinduism. unfortunately a lot of hindus try to be broad minded and tell us we should be indian first and all are equal. this statement shows his utter lack of knowledge about hinduism and how we have muslims living amonngst us today. just watch a muslim talk about india , and you know he is muslim first and muslim last who just happened to be born in india.
indian culture is incredible. yet, i detect much anti black and class hatred. sad that such a great culture allows itself to be manipulated by the dictates of foriegners and corrupt elites.
thats what is being taught to you by communists and muslims? which is not true at all. go back and read some history written by indian scholers not by british peoples.
If the history written by British historians cannot be trusted as accurate then how can a person trust history written by Indians to be accurate. Aryan invasion is not a myth. Just look at the difference in culture between North India and South India.
because it is written by our ancestors, our rishis and munis , that's why its trustworthy.Where do u see differnce in culture, same shlokas during marriage and other customs, same dieties are worshipped , same ram and krishna, I don;t see any difference in cultures.
You mean to tell me there is no difference between a South Indian and a North Indian. To you a Tamil and a Punjabi is the same. As for Hindu religion, Ravan is hated and demonized in the North but South Indians respect him. There are some hindus that don't worship idols since it is forbidden in the vedas but majority of hindus worship idols. There are some hindus that still practice Sati but others don't.
Sati culture is long gone from bharat. It came in to picture when Rani padmini jumped in fire to save her honour from muslim invader alauddin khilji, it all started when honour of hindu ladies was in danger because of muslim invaders.
even after 1947 partition so many hindu and sikh ladies laid their lives to save their honour.
sati has always been mis-interprated by anti hindu historians.
tamil and punjabis are same because they follow the same cultures and ancestral roots, they are two branches of a tree.
ravan is worshipped because of his valour and vedic knowledge and shiv bhakti, this is the beauty of hinduism that it extracts and respect the merrits of even a evil person. He is hated because of his AHANKAAR. He is respected and hated in both north and south due to a commom hindu culture.
and where does it say that one cannot be considered hindu if not a idol worshipper.
the concocted aryan invasion theory by treacherous men to divide along race and to infuse inferiority, has been debunked again and again...not a single river or mountains mentioned by our rishis in our text and scriptures exist outside Bharatvarsh...foolish maxmullr and co. most of who did not know sanskrit even like present day romila thapar wasted so much energy n time for this theory to prove nothing...so typical..
this is soo lame lo... sorry i dont know if this is offence to anyone. maybe this is some new scripture you ppl want to start following but it sucks. common. we all know india and islam. anm why and HOW india exists today. dont try and blame or brainwash ppl. your so lame lol, lmao
3. What do you say about attack on lal masjid by pakistan army ? I just want indian muslims to learn from what's happenning in muslim world.
4. Have you heard what benazir bhutto just said about madrassas ?
5. What you think , why gujrat riots started ? I feel as much pain as you about people who died there,but I also have more sympathy for those who were killed in Gohra train. do you feel the pain for them ?
This would be nice if you were encouraging Muslims to improve what not but the way it is constructed it accomplished little but to instigate. Perhaps you should take a closer look at history and at the beliefs of people.
1. The first Mosque in India was in Kerala during the 7th Century, not the invaders as portrayed.
2. By showing only invaders you are equating Muslims as foreign, which is a British orientalist thought; you fail to recognize that an identity of a Muslim Indian exists.
i agree. we are human beings and indian first and muslim or hindu later.
zulfitareen 2 years ago
long live india.
zulfitareen 2 years ago
i agree with you, brother.
zulfitareen 2 years ago
we are Indian 1st then Hindu or muslims
arunthakur1983 3 years ago
this is the problem..Yes we are indian first then hindu..ask the same question to a fellow muslim....He will open your eyes to tell you that he is muslim first then indian
DESIINNY 2 years ago
@DESIINNY all indians are linked to hinduism. unfortunately a lot of hindus try to be broad minded and tell us we should be indian first and all are equal. this statement shows his utter lack of knowledge about hinduism and how we have muslims living amonngst us today. just watch a muslim talk about india , and you know he is muslim first and muslim last who just happened to be born in india.
killintymm 1 year ago
i agree with you, brother.
zulfitareen 2 years ago
i agree with you, brother
zulfitareen 2 years ago
indian culture is incredible. yet, i detect much anti black and class hatred. sad that such a great culture allows itself to be manipulated by the dictates of foriegners and corrupt elites.
sufilm 3 years ago
Hinduism isn't a foreign religion
wwwshaunwww 3 years ago 6
The first invaders of India were the Aryans and most of Hindu religion comes from Aryans. Hinduism is a foreign religion.
owais77 3 years ago
thats what is being taught to you by communists and muslims? which is not true at all. go back and read some history written by indian scholers not by british peoples.
DESIINNY 3 years ago
If the history written by British historians cannot be trusted as accurate then how can a person trust history written by Indians to be accurate. Aryan invasion is not a myth. Just look at the difference in culture between North India and South India.
owais77 3 years ago
because it is written by our ancestors, our rishis and munis , that's why its trustworthy.Where do u see differnce in culture, same shlokas during marriage and other customs, same dieties are worshipped , same ram and krishna, I don;t see any difference in cultures.
DESIINNY 3 years ago
You mean to tell me there is no difference between a South Indian and a North Indian. To you a Tamil and a Punjabi is the same. As for Hindu religion, Ravan is hated and demonized in the North but South Indians respect him. There are some hindus that don't worship idols since it is forbidden in the vedas but majority of hindus worship idols. There are some hindus that still practice Sati but others don't.
owais77 3 years ago
Sati culture is long gone from bharat. It came in to picture when Rani padmini jumped in fire to save her honour from muslim invader alauddin khilji, it all started when honour of hindu ladies was in danger because of muslim invaders.
even after 1947 partition so many hindu and sikh ladies laid their lives to save their honour.
sati has always been mis-interprated by anti hindu historians.
DESIINNY 3 years ago
tamil and punjabis are same because they follow the same cultures and ancestral roots, they are two branches of a tree.
ravan is worshipped because of his valour and vedic knowledge and shiv bhakti, this is the beauty of hinduism that it extracts and respect the merrits of even a evil person. He is hated because of his AHANKAAR. He is respected and hated in both north and south due to a commom hindu culture.
and where does it say that one cannot be considered hindu if not a idol worshipper.
DESIINNY 3 years ago
the concocted aryan invasion theory by treacherous men to divide along race and to infuse inferiority, has been debunked again and again...not a single river or mountains mentioned by our rishis in our text and scriptures exist outside Bharatvarsh...foolish maxmullr and co. most of who did not know sanskrit even like present day romila thapar wasted so much energy n time for this theory to prove nothing...so typical..
skrish108 2 years ago
@DESIINNY
Ravana or Lord Rama or anybody except God shouldn't be worshipped...
Just try to realize, whom we worship they also worshiped the God Almighty...
SunnyChawla1992 1 year ago
aryan invasion theory has been already negated by westerners only, it has been proven false. search youtube for more
vpanwar 3 years ago
this is soo lame lo... sorry i dont know if this is offence to anyone. maybe this is some new scripture you ppl want to start following but it sucks. common. we all know india and islam. anm why and HOW india exists today. dont try and blame or brainwash ppl. your so lame lol, lmao
MyFutUrFace 4 years ago
check out my video named ISLAM IN INDIA-MUST WATCH
DESIINNY 4 years ago
3. Muslims need to stop sending their kids to only learn from Madrassas; point agreed.
4. You should understand Muslim beliefs before you say they should all say Vande Mataram. THey can be full patriots without singing every song.
HyderabadiBhai 4 years ago
3. What do you say about attack on lal masjid by pakistan army ? I just want indian muslims to learn from what's happenning in muslim world.
4. Have you heard what benazir bhutto just said about madrassas ?
5. What you think , why gujrat riots started ? I feel as much pain as you about people who died there,but I also have more sympathy for those who were killed in Gohra train. do you feel the pain for them ?
DESIINNY 4 years ago
This would be nice if you were encouraging Muslims to improve what not but the way it is constructed it accomplished little but to instigate. Perhaps you should take a closer look at history and at the beliefs of people.
1. The first Mosque in India was in Kerala during the 7th Century, not the invaders as portrayed.
2. By showing only invaders you are equating Muslims as foreign, which is a British orientalist thought; you fail to recognize that an identity of a Muslim Indian exists.
HyderabadiBhai 4 years ago 3
i do accept the identity of indian muslims , but as long as they consider indian history and indian icon as their own.
1. Do you accept the paintings of M F Hussain are anti Indian ?
2. Do you accept the migration of Hindus from Kashmir is not good for india ?
3. Can you raise your voice against islamic terrorism when kasmiri hindus are affected with same vigour as killing of gujrat muslims?
DESIINNY 4 years ago