Holy Shit(s) ?

[WizoHattMapepe]

this is very disrespectful o.O

[CristinaMaria11]

@WizoHattMapepe this is the internet , deal with it .

[itsomgbarbiexo]

Ur sexy

[LibertarianOnline]

He must have taken shits... *smirk*

lol

[GTarcisius006]

Guess it's just as awkward as asking "Did Jesus have sex?" lol. But I'm guessing most of u have already made up ur mind about that one..thanks, Dan Brown.

[utuebmakeustupid]

BEST COMEDY OF THE DAY

[LiberAnarchy]

That's some deep thinkin' there dude. lulz!

[Sinnessa]

Jesus laid chocolate eggs. How do you think we got Easter, stupid? Easter is Christian stuff.

[KonkinWasRight]

This video is fucking awesome.

[MCARRMUSIC343]

This is really funny cause my buddy and i were just talkin' bout this

[EarthBeautifull]

wow, when the heck did I sub this channel. I guess i must of been smoking some bad weed. Damn Puerto Ricans always sell u the fucked up shit.

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@EarthBeautifull fucking puerto ricans

[DeltaNordicAdvance]

Yeah but did Jesus ever have to clean someone else's shitty ass and change the bed pan??

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@DeltaNordicAdvance I highly doubt that one

[BabelOn4infinity]

This question is as old as Christianity itself. I believe this is the reason the Gnostics believed Jesus could not have been a material body but was instead some sort of spirit or projection that could walk through walls. I could be wrong though.

[sharperguy]

Trying to be a comedian?

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@sharperguy Yes

[sharperguy]

@InTheEndIWasRight Heh well good luck and don't just turn into TAA.

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@sharperguy I'm not really though and I wont. 

[RationalDischarge]

Well, I suppose they didn't have agriculture to nearly the same extent back then, so Jesus would have probably eaten something approximating the Paleo Diet.  I'll bet he was very regular, and had an enviable digestive tract.

[mrsuperbafrango]

jesus shat for our sins........you heathan!

[alistairproductions]

hilarious video

[jollyradical]

Shit I never really thought about that shit. He definitely talked a lot of shit, but then again who gives a shit.

[Morrakiu]

Jesus's shit was probably a drug for humans like vampire blood is in True Blood.

All the disciples were inhaling his diarrhea.

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@Morrakiu Lets all inhale diarrhea

[evilsceptic]

Nipples or GTFO.

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@evilsceptic Alright next time

[thespacialone]

Utterly pointless.

[thespacialone]

Utterly pointless.

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@thespacialone that's the point

[MISTERWONKA7]

This video changed my perspective on the universe itself.

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@MISTERWONKA7 Fuck yea

[FluidDeconstructor]

@InTheEndIWasRight

Why are you bothering yourself with "agnostic atheist" obfuscation?

There is no such thing as agnosticism, it is just a way to ease the emotional brunt of explicitly saying to someone that their belief is baseless incoherent nonsense.

If you lack a belief in god you are an atheist. What is asserted without evidence, not only can, but must be dismissed without evidence. Especially such a thing as god who's man-made construction is thoroughly understood.

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@FluidDeconstructor While I lack a belief in God(s) due to lack of evidence, I can not actively disprove the existence totally of God(s), so Agnostic-Atheist. But if I was to chose I'd be an Atheist.

[FluidDeconstructor]

@InTheEndIWasRight

Replace the word "god" with any man-made creature like "elf".

Adding anything to atheist label or straight up "agnostic" nonsense is deceitful obfuscation. It's a game played for reasons of social interactions, not because it has logical validity.

[blackacidlizzard]

@FluidDeconstructor

The reason for precision is to be precise. In this case to differentiate oneself from gnostic atheists, ie those who claim to know that no gods exist.

"agnostic" = "without knowledge" You lack the knowledge of the use of the word in this context, therefore agnosticism (lack of knowledge) certainly does exist.

Next time, don't assume you understand what is being said, you obviously don't have a large enough pool of knowledge to make that a safe bet. :)

[FluidDeconstructor]

@blackacidlizzard

You lack reading comprehension skill. Try again.

[blackacidlizzard]

@FluidDeconstructor

No, sorry, I understand you perfectly. You may be rather smart, but sometimes you won't be the smartest person in the room. This is one of those times. :)

[MartyrLoserKing]

SELL OUT!!!!

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@MartyrLoserKing I'm the whore of babylon

[adjohnson916]

There is no denying the existence of some holy ass shits, but what of the holy fucks?

[GompCelticPL]

I heard that the last thing you do before you die is shit your pants. Man crucifixion has a whole new meaning for me now.

[tattooskin72]

I just think it's hilarious that you actually sat there thinking about this.

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@tattooskin72 I have some weird thoughts ha

[Tsicar]

LOL, what the fuck prompted you to make this video?

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@Tsicar I really was thinking about jesus shitting lol

[kubaniski]

Jesus was definitely a real person there's no real doubt about that since we have a bunch of different non-christian historians confirming his existence.

So he definitely took shits, big hsits small shits, hard as rock, and mushy yellow shits. The question is were they holy shits????

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@kubaniski Lmao haha

[FluidDeconstructor]

@kubaniski

You are lying, there is not a single iota of evidence that "Jesus" ever existed. On the contrary, there are so many contradictions, modifications and forgeries that it is far more likely that "Jesus" was a literary device, like in many other myths.

[kubaniski]

@FluidDeconstructor Highly unlikely since the various writings about Jesus while differing they are all different portraits of the same man. Also the writings of Paul's letters for example show Paul making off the cuff comments about Jesus which would make very little sense if he was just a literary device.

The Jewish Historian Josephus and the Roman historian Tacitus made mention of Jesus in their writings. 

[FluidDeconstructor]

@kubaniski

Josephus is a forgery, the only "evidence" of Jesus In the entire ancient non-Christian library comprising the works of dozens of historians, writers, philosophers, politicians and others who never mentioned the great sage and wonderworker Jesus Christ, even though they lived contemporaneously with or shortly after the Christian savior's purported advent.

[kubaniski]

@FluidDeconstructor Jesus was like you said a religious figure who's movement was a minority one among the Jews for the next 30 years after his death. There were plenty of religious movements in that time period that were not mentioned by most historians.

I understand that you're probably going through you atheist but-hurt period right now, I went through one myself when I was younger. But the historical fact is that while Jesus was likely not divine, he was however a real person.

[FluidDeconstructor]

@kubaniski

You are lying again, not that it really matters if Jesus was real or not since we know Mohammed was real and that doesn't make everyone muslim...

Oh, and are the scholars who studied this for decades also young butt-hurt atheists, you insufferable fool...

[kubaniski]

@FluidDeconstructor I'm lying? About what?? Again???

Yes Mo was real, but how would that make everyone a Muslim???

I am very confident that Jesus was a real person and i'm not a christian. Buddha was a real person too, i'm not a Buddhist either.

The vast majority of serious historians who studied the matter agree that Jesus was an actual person. And yes i don't doubt that many of these scholars are butthurt atheists.

[FluidDeconstructor]

@kubaniski

How the hell can you be so dumb, the difference between scholars who claim that Jesus was real and those who don't is that the former are influenced by irrational baseless apologetics and latter are influenced by evidence and proper research.

copypaste this into google and click on the first result:

"Jesus Myth - The Case Against Historical Christ"

[kubaniski]

@FluidDeconstructor dude there are plenty of "brave non apologist scholars" who deny the Armenian genocide.

But you seem butt-hurt about this so i'm just gonna have your way i concede that you are right, Socrates did not exist.

Have a nice day.

[mjbarrowful]

Did he have a real physical body? I thought he was like a ghost person that could walk through walls and stuff

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@mjbarrowful That would've been cooler I think

[liberalgamer4]

he must of masturbated as well, it all makes sense now.

[TheGirlSpeaks15]

Yes. Just yes.

[InvincibleNumanist]

Kim Jong Ill didnt take shits.

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@InvincibleNumanist I pissed whiskey though

[GlassFight]

been hitting the gym? your shoulders look broader

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@GlassFight Trying to and I hope they are. I'm off from school for a few weeks, and I hope it all doesn't disappear once I cant do shit during school though.

[MirageScience]

just an agnostic atheist?  pussy

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@MirageScience Well if I was forced to pick, then atheist

[SonOfTanit]

Jesus didn't take shits, he sweated out.

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@SonOfTanit What did he sweat? Hersheys syrup?

[SonOfTanit]

@InTheEndIWasRight

Brown stinky sweat, but definitly not shit...

[Knr911]

And when you think about this, oil (petroleum) is the decomposition of all organic matter, trees, humans, leaves, mammals, insects, birds, and shit. You might as well have already powered your car with Jesus.

Which means the christians are right, global warming is really a punishment from God. O_O

HOLY SHI-

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@Knr911 Hahaha, word

[Mementomori690069]

He also masterbated.

[Luigi84289]

What kind of heaven would a sexless heaven be? Heaven can only be sexless.

[liberalgamer4]

@Luigi84289 thats sounds like the exact opposite of heaven