Onda VX797HD Monster 7.0 'Portable' MP4 Player - High Res Player

[doujindance]

unenable mp4 file?

[danyyydanyyy2009]

Vreau si eu acest player,in Romania nu se poate returna?ca eu nu pot cumpara de pe internet,nu am nici cont paypal,in Romania in ce market pot gasi acest mp4?vreau sa-mi iau si eu unul,astept raspuns

[Predescu1994]

salut vezi ca mp4 asta are cam jumate de kg si e bun doar sa te uiti la filme hd pe el + adusu din america costa in jur de 10 milioane ; deci nu se merita ! daca vrei un mp4 special iatzi onda vx525 e touchscreen si are 8 gb memorie interna citeste card micro sd muzica filme poze la care le dai zoom pe ecran ca la ipod etc . cel mai important e ca merg jocurile flash ! te joci pe el ca pe net ! daca vrei mai multe detalii da-mi replay

[joeby13]

do these work in the uk ???

[vargyna]

Yes, of course.

[nintendude7cubed]

This player would make a heck of a sleek MID.

Why make a microSD slot as well? I don't mean to be picky, but since this player is so monstrous, you would only need a regular sd slot, heck you could even get away with a CF card on this giant.

[Foxicola]

wow, pretty crisp video! It somehow looks a bit like a portable DVD player just without the whole folding thing. I like that screen.

[xshervinx]

fantastic player! i've buyed one of this and i'm really satisfacted!!! good job Onda!

[7VALVE]

When wos video review AINOL V6000HDS ?

[nathan61984]

Buddon.

[RaptorZX3]

it have the same design as the VX747, and i bet the screen is full of dust between the screen and window...from the VX747, i don't like Onda products anymore...

[IxYamikoxA]

That really is uberly huge XDDD but for people who watch videos more than music, that's pretty good :DD videos look mad beautiful on it ^^ the speakers are pretty loud, too. It's awesome :D

But yeah, the camera's weird O.o

[2BunnyReturns]

LOL!

1:26 - "Its actually not that big of a player considering its size"

[2BunnyReturns]

To be honest, I liked your old reviews better. Your new camera is really crappy in my opinion. Awful interlacing.

Still a good review, but definitely bring back the other camera.

[wongsmokesbong]

Interlacing would not be a problem if he actually deinterlaced it. Instead, it looks like he just uploaded the raw file, so it is not deinterlaced

[2BunnyReturns]

But, how can you "de interlace" something if the lack of video in the "interlace area" was never there to begin with?

[wongsmokesbong]

that is true, however mst camcorders record interlaced (the very expensive ones an som moderately expensive ones record progressive). So, if he got a cheap camera, it would have a lower resolution, but be progressive, while if he used this camera, it'd be higher resolution but interlaced (which you can deinterlace to get slightly lower quality progressive video). I agree that you can't get the information back, but the de-interlacing setup will overall have better video than the previous camera.

[2BunnyReturns]

Well, I have a crappy camera (for video, it takes nice still pictures, a Nikon Coolpix S2), and it takes videos in progressive, even though they are only 640 by 480 maximum at 15 frames per second.

Yeah, kinda like that.

[japanesebomber]

nothing new only the size.

[Clazzy8]

that's ridiculously huge.

[wrathpsp]

thats what my wife said =]

[ImTheRealJames75]

nice