Added: 2 years ago
From: kjfnlksa
Views: 37,189
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (60)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • was this with the 2.3L NA?  and was it OEM at the time?

  • @Seif5034 yah it was all stock then now undergoing swap as we speek 2.3 turbo out of 88 turbo coupe

  • Sounds like me, after way too much taco hell...

  • Comment removed

  • i literally started laughing when he hit the gas hahaha

  • 88 hp FTW

  • what yr. is this one-i,ve got the 93 lx,same moter-BUT ,near the front inside fender,it has that 5.0 markings- most people think the 4-cyl.,s not fast- not true

  • Piece of shit car, scrap it and buy something better you redneck

  • @xdx1990 mustang aint a redneck car smarts

  • Who Farted

  • Damn surprised it could even spin the tires brake standing.

  • damn my 302 ho fox would never of got grip as fast but when it did it would of been gone

  • @TheP4l its a 4cyl

  • so either way it goes, yea, it might be a 4banger... but idc what ya say it does have balls.. and the guy with the 5.0 talkin smack, everyone has a 5.0 but who has a 2.3l stang or like me... i got a 89 cougar xr7 3.8v6 SUPERCHARGED with a 5SPEED. dare to be different dont blend in the crowd :D

  • i had an 86 stang with a 2.3L with the 4spd toploader trans in it, i think thats what its  called. the motor was a rigged up 2.3 4 banger with a one barrel carb on it, had a aftermarket header and cherry bomb on it. it was a 4 plug not an 8 plug. i was told the motor was rebuilt and it looked it but didnt know for sure. but i tell ya what it had some balls for a 4 banger and i could smoke it just as bad as this one here... even hung with a saturn redline on the highway...

  • Gay

  • There for a second, it sounded like the camera man was farting but then I realized it was the Mustang. LOL

  • was that the engine or did someone shit themselves?

  • @worldofwilfred no thats stock.. motor will be in next month i will have a couple videos on the install and test run keep a eye out next month for the vid.

  • @kjfnlksa will it still be a 2.3l and what head you got

  • damn hillbillies get a nice car and have to rod on it

  • my mustang 2.3 no turbo 4 speed and 90hp can do that to ........... you need block your rear brakes to do that burn out

  • yeah good thing it has a 5.0 on the fender

  • @dylanfreeski123 makes it go faster lol

  • Really??? You had to add the gay ass yeehaw??? Damn.......

  • my 2.3 liter 5speed top end would run right beside a stock 5.0 they would get me on take off but i would catch up in 3rd gear and they could not out run me top end ... mine was a 1991 2.3 eight plug had 110 horses stock ... had a saleen body kit on it ( after market and was on when i bought it ) dual exhaust straight out the back that sounded like a 5.0 with flowmasters but did not have flows on it .... i wished i never got rid of the car ... i have been looking for it since i sold it!!!

  • @1969fordtruck haha your 2.3 would not touch my 5.0 im sorry i would eat you off the line and pull even harder on highway

  • @ben351w .... lol .. your funny .... like i said a stock 5.0 had no chance against my 4 banger .... neither would yours unless its not stock ... but if yours is not stock then i would run it against my 85 ford ranger and still blow you away ....

  • @1969fordtruck haha what you got done turbo with a 75 shot then ya i could see that then

  • @ben351w .... lol .... no my ranger is not stock ,,,, or is it road legal!!! i built it for drag racing ... has a 302 ho roller motor out of a 91 mustang gt in it. and has been punched .60 over. has lunati bracketmaster II comp cam, long tube headers with side pipes, High rise intake with edelbrock 650cfm 4 barrel (New, just put on last week) heads have been ported, flat top pistons... and quiet a few others .... lol .... anyway like i said not road legal... so whats been done to your stang

  • Huh I live in bullitt county

  • @dirtgraw i live in ferncreek by the geansnyder

    

  • does the stock 2.3L have enough to get you from point A to B happily? i mean 90hp.... it must be in the gearing.

  • @halflife103 it has plenty of hp and if you open it up a bit with a cold air intake and a flowmaster 40 or 44 and e3 sparkplugs and take off the ac belt under the hood your looking arruond 120 hp or even more... mine is a 5 speed and i did those mods and a little more and i can beat most honda's non turbo iv beat si vtech with my little stang

  • @kjfnlksa oh yeah? nice. ill remember that.

  • @kjfnlksa lol or jsut get a v8 and whoop any honda

  • @kjfnlksa u aint beating a 190hp si 2010 vteck or a 160 hp 2000 si vtec my accord 1993 ex 175hp will smoke u not to mention my 1996 thunderbird LX V8 still feel tuff?

  • @kjfnlksa yo!! i have a 2.3 and i read that you did some mods can you tell me all of them that you did and explain some??

  • @scagy23 like what else do u want me to explain??? other things i did was port match the upper and lower intake to the gasket with a drimmel.. and 2.5L ranger tubbler header with heat wrap and 94 gt 60mm throttle body ohh and im running full synthetic oil it seems to help... Iv done these mods about 3 or 4 month's ago and now i have even more power so that person that said i cant beat honda's and si is even more wrong cause now i beat up on them even more lol... friend has integra si and i win..

  • @kjfnlksa integra si huh.... sorry buddy i have an 89 5speed 2.3 mustang

    and while it's a fun car to drive and handles well it is by no means a speed demon in a straight line

    as for how fast ur car is well stock they have 88hp (at the crank, last dyno i saw was 49whp at 4900rpm)

    minus the nomal power loss over time with an engine and the mods you have, id say ur looking at about 90-95crank hp or about 65-70whp. thought i'd inform you

  • @halflife103 OHHH also eather cut off or gutt the catalytic converter that will free up 5-9HP...

  • @halflife103 2.3 had a few models, the base was a 88 horse 5 speed, the next was a 105 horse that came with a 4 speed auto or a 5 speed. so maybe this one has a whole 105 HP!

  • Yes. mock up a plate to convert, but make sure you port to match, and you use the stock tps sensor from the svo

  • Sweet! I have two 2.3 stangs, m turbo car spins tires so violently, it hardly leaves smoke, but my n/a 2.3/ automatic convertible puts on a smoke show! The stock one isn't fast, but it's got alot of torque,

  • lol my mustang has a 2.3 it can do the same thing

  • can a 5.o throttle body fit on a 2.3?

  • Yes, one off of a 94 or 95 Mustang GT. You just need to do work on the throttle linkage to get them to work. Racer Walsh sells a Big Bore throttle body for the 2.3L that runs around $400 which is a total ripoff. All it is is a 94-95 Mustang GT throttle body.

  • The ranger roler cam what have gotton you better results, nice any way. My cam pully broke and my cam and cam bearings are shot now, which means it is time for upgrade!

  • that was bad ass not meny 2.3l can do that

  • those emblems are 5.0l not 2.3l

  • are those 2.3l emblems??? haha i have those as well..

  • what have you done to it? oh i thought it was an auto

  • how the hell did u get ur 2.3 to burn out??

  • I know how to drive a 5 speed and it's not stock!!!

  • @kjfnlksa dosent have to be modded i can do them in mine and mine is completly stock

  • @kjfnlksa hey do you what kind of silver that is?

    im only asking because im looking for that similair color for mine

  • @nsinhold how the hell can u not... haha.... shit its fuckin easy... 5spd drop the fuckin clutch and get on the brake.... auto... put the bitch in 1st and get on the brake...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more