We need the tank versions in Afghanistan...i would help chase those current bad guys out of there caves...imagine an Abrams tank converted to be a flamethrower tank
why dont they use flamethrowers any more i mean sure u get shot in the back woopdy doo u blow up but at least you can burn your enemie and have a human bbq
3:03 SECONDS..........."ONCE YOU'VE SHOT YOUR LOAD".............HA HA HA, LMAO ! Its "CHILLING" to know the manner in which some of the flamethrower operators perished !!!!!!!!!!!
if this weapon was excellent at clearing out buildings and entrenched enemies, why was it decomissioned?? it was very effective
kaneda956 2 months ago
@kaneda956 It made you an easy target to take out.
99thJediWarrior 1 month ago
crispry-critter-producing, portable can of WHOOP-ASS, LMFAO!
rexkablooey62 3 months ago
"Chasin' bad guys outta caves was a thing of the past". Well....maybe not just yet. LONG LIVE THE FLAMETHROWER!
UH1Huey3113 3 months ago
When Chesty Puller first saw this weapon, he said "Where the hell do you put the bayonet?"
about37ninjas 4 months ago
Now we have a handy dandy thing called thermobaric grenades to do the job.
Lukos0036 5 months ago
its better the russian guy |: )
search on youtube for "FLAMETHROWER MASSACRE "
and youll se HOW A MAN DO THIS !
saintsithx 5 months ago
protestors: it burns....
soldiers: no shit.
fatsuburbanwhiteboy 6 months ago
a portable can of whoop ass
ALLERTORLOVER69 6 months ago
he said shot your load!!
gunny426plymouth 7 months ago
fuck geneva convention. war is supose to be inhumane! thumbs up
17143972290 7 months ago
@17143972290
Kid are you having problems?
Antunez99 6 months ago
We need the tank versions in Afghanistan...i would help chase those current bad guys out of there caves...imagine an Abrams tank converted to be a flamethrower tank
Rustyshacklefization 11 months ago
@Rustyshacklefization They could be too vulnerable in a real fight.
Zappina 10 months ago
@Zappina exactly that's why we need them in Afghanistan .....there isn't any REAL fights there
Rustyshacklefization 10 months ago
why dont they use flamethrowers any more i mean sure u get shot in the back woopdy doo u blow up but at least you can burn your enemie and have a human bbq
pivotnoob236 1 year ago
@pivotnoob236 the Geneva Convention. it was considered too Inhumane, also the part about it being really heavy.
Declawlen 1 year ago 9
@Declawlen but we used it in vietnam and WWII. The geneva convention was back after WWI
TapRackBoom 7 months ago
this is what cool people use for BBQs instead of that lame grill
0mgwtfbbq21 1 year ago
3:02 "once you've shot your load" hahaha
BsGms3 1 year ago
@BsGms3 XD
jak795 11 months ago
once I drop my load......
noah3824 1 year ago
I can see long range vehicle mounted flamethrowers being of use in current conflicts.
Atomicskull 2 years ago
@Atomicskull how can they be used in current conflicts if they're banned by the Geneva Convention?
Gestapo1940 1 year ago
@Gestapo1940 Because only the good countries obey the rules
1ohtaf1 1 year ago
@Gestapo1940 lol cause enemy nations never abide by the rules of engagement, thats why we need to bring it back and teach em a lesson.
kaneda956 2 months ago
chasing bad guys outta caves a thing of the past...oh the irony
1guncrazy1 2 years ago 43
3:03 SECONDS..........."ONCE YOU'VE SHOT YOUR LOAD".............HA HA HA, LMAO ! Its "CHILLING" to know the manner in which some of the flamethrower operators perished !!!!!!!!!!!
strazzy3 2 years ago
u fuckin kidding?
omri1324 2 years ago
lol
AirJordan2322 2 years ago
you fail
apemaverick07 2 years ago