Added: 3 years ago
From: nakedlord
Views: 211,060
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (433)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • John, Paul, George and Ringo have all said any time they tried to hold a recording session while high on anything harder than pot the music came out shite and they'd have to start over, and that drugs were no more an influence on their writing than where they lived or what they ate for breakfast.

  • Yes!!

  • I'd rather listen to the manager of the local Tesco or those charismatic job centre employees than listen to Bill Hicks. This won't look very good on my CV doing this so I'm going now! I'm humble and religious and I wear a suit and go to a job that doesn't inspire me creatively and I will end up grey as a badger soon and die from all the crap I subscribe to.

    ...

    Haha, fuck that! We can do better, my delicious friends.

  • LOL

  • Teh dislikes are from beatles fans who are looking for beatles videos in youtube and thought bill hicks is one of beatle song lol

  • @BahoUtot Erm...i got news I love The Beatles and i find this hilarious...because its most probably true.

  • 18 people can't get off the ceiling.

  • i like turtles.

  • so fucking true

  • Bills the best but the Beatles drugs or no drugs sucked.

  • @garnier5entropy fuck you.

  • @garnier5entropy Heheheh no.

  • @garnier5entropy Wow and what do you listen to? It's one thing to say you don't like their music, it's another to say that the most influential and popular band in history sucked. I won't say greatest as music is subjective.

  • @garnier5entropy Now thats just silly

  • Wow, this sounds like audio I've heard at the first of a pretty good song somewhere...

  • @ccrosbie33 Its called a sample..

  • @Truesaint33 Wow, really, I had no idea.

    I realize Hicks allowed Tool to use this for "Third Eye." I was just pointing that out...

  • Frank Zappa Baam! Fuck off Bill Hicks!

  • @dummeswe his dead.. aka "fucked off"

  • @aMondia Fuck you.

  • Great point, but why did he use the worst Beatles song, arguably the worst song ever, to make it?

  • @aMondia he diden't just mean that song. He took that song for making the joke much clearer

  • @aMondia Because of Ringo...

  • Too much anger on this comment list. You obviously need to get high(er).

  • what a bunch of shit. rock and roll singers are not even good singers. ask any professional opera singer who by the way are true singers. and besides it is only his OPINION WHICH MUSIC IS GOOD AND WHICH IS BAD, so he is not being artistic or even objective but only his opinion. Few people in rock and roll coud actualy sing good. My opinion is that rock music has no real soul.

  • @smallpotatoes989 my opinion is that your a pretentious twat. Objectively a pretentious twat too

  • @J4YM5 I am not or at least I try not to be. But at least I am not insulting like you were. Just trying to make a point.

  • @smallpotatoes989 yeh but any music has got more soul than pop music, thats his point. maybe you dont know bill hick's material

  • @smallpotatoes989 ''Rock and roll music is no real soul'(That sentence just made me sick)'UMM soul music is rock and roll music, watch bb king, Its rock and roll and it has soul, Oh and look back at the opera singers during the victorian times who where taking snuff (A type of drug)

  • @MrCherubhair1 Snuff is tobacco lol

  • @dymondgeezer2003 Yes its made from it, its pulverised and other things are added and it gets you high, its a drug.

  • @MrCherubhair1

    Yet it is a drug, i know, i did just call it tobacco. But you cant compare that to the hallucinogenics that the Beatles were famous for. Its like comparing Keith Richards' heroin addiction to a hardcore chewing tobacco addiction. Its not a fair comparison. It doesnt get you 'high' in the way hallucinogenics do. Snuff, as with any other tobacco intake method, is not known for expanding your mind in this way.

  • @MrCherubhair1 I agree with your point, but your argument is arse. You'd been better off talking about absinthe.

  • @dymondgeezer2003 I agree with your point, but your argument is vagina. you'd

    been better off talking about cock.

  • @smallpotatoes989 HAHAHAHAHAHA hilarious comment of the year away goes to you, unless you're trolling... then that's a whole other story.

  • Paul actually wrote the song for Ringo to sing. Ringo didn't write it.

  • Ringo didn't write Yellow Submarine. Paul did and he wasn't high when he wrote it. Hicks was a dick trying to make out booze and smoke and drugs made you a better artist. Not one thing in this clip is funny.

  • @ianwilson2007 Are you missing the point of comedy? I think you are. Comedy, although sometimes portrait as such, is not all truth. It's an amusing thought that the Beatles were high and Ringe wrote the song while tripping balls, but you can't take stuff like that for real.

    And lastly, taste. You don't like him? Stop watching his videos, and please fucking stop commenting on them trying to tell his fans he's bullshit...

  • @diiebane I don't mind Hicks I'm just saying this piece is poorly done. It's not funny and it's factually incorrect. Ringo didn't write the song so his (Hicks') whole point is making himself look dumb. Also there are so many grammatical and spelling errors in what you said that you make yourself look like a fool. I think you meant 'portrayed' not 'portrait' to name but one. And Ringo has an 'O' at the end not an 'E'.

  • @ianwilson2007 If being a fool is writing in English although not being a native speaker, and thus making mistakes every once a while, by all means, I'm a fool.

    Other than that, of course you're entitled to your opinion. I don't know if the facts are right in this joke, and I don't really care to be honest. I think it's funny anyway.

  • @ianwilson2007 dude, don't take everything you see or hear so seriously.

  • You know what? Hicks should watch the doc "Paul Mcartney is really dead" Deep.

  • @mrcarr1000 He's watching in the afterlife.

  • @mrcarr1000 I dunno about that doc man. There's no way some random dude was able to play all those amazing bass parts after the "real" Paul supposedly died.

  • Thought you would like this guy...Bill Hicks was amazing, and by the way a friend of Tool....the band I lent you thier CD when I first met you, who are good friends of Alex Grey.....

  • third eye xD

  • first time I see/hear bill hicks in action. Oh boy, talk about overrated!!!

  • @jef108

    You say this after hearing a minute of material?

  • @ybrik222 seen a couple of his pieces here...sorry, not my thing. I prefer Monty Python...

  • @jef108 Im not gonna flame at you like some internet asshole, but.... Bill hicks and Monty python are like reaaally different. Monty Python is wet-your-pants funny sketch comedy. Bill Hicks is more social commentary. Not really supposed to make you laugh your rear off, so much as get upset at society.

  • @wimpylassiter2336 I get that. Bill didn't get (yet) that that kind of anger at society is useless (not to mention very self-righteous). While Python transcends all "social commentary" as such, they are the sharpest bunch of social critics around. Just in a matúre and REALLY funny way. But, as Groucho said: "if it's funny, they'll laugh", when asked about the nature of humour, so if bill makes you laugh...enjoy. No skin of my back :)

  • @jef108 i love you. thank you for resonding calmly and quoting groucho marx.

  • @jef108 Good on you for not going on the normal youtube "this is shit" rant and taking a rational stance on your views. Personally I am a huge Python and Hicks fan and I like them both for different reasons

  • @jef108 I'm curious to why you called him overrated. In my opinion he's one of the best social commenters of all time, and even if you think social commentary is useless, you can't deny he's amazing at it. Frankly, I'm sorry for you if you think you can dismiss 16 of material just because you've "seen a couple of his pieces".

  • @1000jamesk I guess it's a matter of taste, partly...but I find him sound angry, bitter and his perspective is (for what I've seen) adolescent and easy (and dated)...but not that I think he was stupid and I'm sure he was a nice guy...just a bit overrated. I don't think social commentary is useless persé, I just prefer Monty Python's version of it :)

  • @jef108 John Cleese (along with Michael Palin agreeing) repeatedly commented he was a fan of Hicks & a comedy hero to him, and said he was the only comic to have really thrilled him in the last decades. If that ain't endorsement, I don't know what is.

  • @d3xo and?

  • the chili peppers are great with or without drugs. i cant wait to hear somethin new from john frusciante.

  • chili peppers + drugs = epic!

  • If drugs are so good for music, explain why Aerosmith were so much better after they quit.

    On the other hand, in the 1960s, the Beatles smoked pot and gave us "Rubber Soul," "Revolver" and "Sgt. Pepper." In the 2000s, Seth Rogen and Judd Apatow smoked pot and gave us the grossest movies this side of John Waters. As Mort Sahl would say, "You know what this means? Darwin was wrong!"

  • @UncleMikeNJ i like seth and judd.

  • @UncleMikeNJ

    superbad was awesome!

  • Yup TOOL so awesome!

  • Tool third eye

  • For all the know-nothings that think that drugs don't have anything to do with music, read the very good book "Revolution in the Head" about the Beatles - you can hear and musicologically analyse the very moment the Beatles started doing marijuana in the way their songwriting changed, almost overnight. Drugs don't make for good musicians, but good musicians plus drugs is a helluva combination.

  • @justanopinionyeah That's exactly it. It's not the drugs, but your talents (music/writing/science) plus drugs make for something special.

  • One Word: TOOL!

  • Amazing! Ha

  • Great music =Really high =) im complete <3

  • Favorite Comedian + Favorite Band = Awesome Video.

  • Funny....but Paul McCartney wrote "Yellow Submarine" carefully within Ringo's limited vocal range.

  • Jimi Hendrix & Kurt Cobain.

  • John Lennon really was on acid when he wrote that song. They were slipped lsd and while driving home the van looked like a yellow submarine. then when they finally arrived home he wrote the song (still tripping)

  • @peskar218 WRONG! Paul McCartney wrote it.

  • @novadrian who cares? that wasn't the point. it was the worst Beatles song ever.

  • This man speaks the truth.

    Metallica - Drinkin' and Drugging Thrashers, put out some good music. They sober up, clean up, blah blah blah, and they put out Saint Anger and a bunch of Radio Rock trash.

    Dave Mustaine. The guy abuses drugs, gets kicked out of Metallica because of it, but puts out four Thrash masterpieces. He gets clean, Megadeth goes down hill, and he becomes a reborn Christian fucking pansy.

    Motorhead - Lemmy and 'em have been doing drugs forever, and still rule to this day.

  • @ThazuaBlackarrow Metallica and Megadeth sucking now has nothing to do with drugs. The money got to them.

  • @elo333333333 Megadeth is still great but Metallica sold out around 91'

  • @94Cioppa 1991....God Damn!

  • @ThazuaBlackarrow You really think that The System Has Failed, United Abominations, and Endgame are signs of Megadeth going downhill? Also, I love Motorhead, but their drugs have nothing to do with their good albums. It's the fact that they had a formula and have remained stuck, glued, and riveted to it for every album with little to no deviation. Compare that to Metallica during it's heyday. And Justice For All, Master of Puppets, and Ride the Lightning all have noticeable differences.

  • @BlackLeather92 ha ha-so speed didn't influence Lemmy or his music in anyway? bullshit! he even says it himself

  • @ThazuaBlackarrow what about straight edge????

  • @ThazuaBlackarrow metallica did drink but never used drugs.

  • @ThazuaBlackarrow if you think that drugs help people produce, play, or perform music any better than they do when sober, you are a sad pathetic tool who has been sucessfully brainwashed by the media. Motorhead have the exact same sound that they had back in 1979, although i do agree that Metallica and Megadeth are rubbish now.

  • @elo333333333 So what if they sound the exact same? They still fucking rule. You don't fix something that ain't broke, and Motorhead doesn't need fixing.

    How have I been brainwashed by the media? The mainstream world doesn't want people doing drugs. I don't see commercials saying "If you do drugs, you'll make great music like Motorhead!" I see commercials about how my brain will turn to scrambled eggs because DRUGS R BAHHHD, and I see more Charlie Sheen cases publicized to show how bad they are

  • @ThazuaBlackarrow You've been brainwashed because the media is responsible for creating the myth known as the "Rock n Roll lifestyle", which states drugs are an everyday part of a rockstar's life. Sex, Drugs and Rock n Roll. Who do you think invented that term? definetely not any artist.

  • @elo333333333 Hahaha "myth"

    So what? That documentary I watched about Motorhead.. Where they did cocaine, speed and drank more than any normal human being ON CAMERA.. What? Created by the media? I realize I keep coming back to Motorhead, that's because the only true Rock 'n' Roll band left, pretty much. That "media-created image", they've been living it long before the media created it. So have many bands. It's not a myth. It's very much a fact that's still very much true today

  • Comment removed

  • @ThazuaBlackarrow no band does drugs so that they can make good music, except for posers. They did drugs because they liked being high/drunk. The media used their hobbies to make dumbass like you think that drugs are what make a rockstar so you can buy their image. Thus, teenagers around the world start doin drugs in their freshman year thinking that they`re rockstars and "rebels". you`re fucking stupid. Wanna look at someone who abused drugs in a non-conformist way? look at Aleister Crowley

  • @elo333333333 Where did I say they do drugs to make good music? Good music is just a side-effect of the drug use. Of course they do drugs because they like the effects. So does everyone. And please. No one starts doing drugs because they want to be rockstars, this isn't the 80's, Rock's pretty much dead now that bands like Alter Bridge and Nickelback are considered Rock.

    There still is no media-created image. "If you've got the beer, we've got the time! You got the coke, gimme a line!"

  • @ThazuaBlackarrow Nice logic, Bring Me The Horizon and Creed frequently smoke weed and they make the shittiest music known to mankind. Anyone who still chooses to do drugs knowing the damage it did on their idols is a fucking moron.

  • @elo333333333 Damage? What damage? Lemmy, MY idol, is still going strong and barely has anything wrong with him. Drugs only damage those who are stupid with them.

    Weed is a little kid's drug, that's why. A lot different than speed, cocaine, and alcohol that is frequently used in the rocker/metalhead/punk crowd. It's like.. Ravers use E and other shitty drugs, and they make shitty music. Acid and all that goes with psychedelic/space rock. Drugs affect music, good drugs go with good music.

  • @ThazuaBlackarrow a lot of great songs have been writen while musicians where High. BUT some weren't like Dream On By Steven Tyler was written before he was even in Aerosmith and had the money to get wasted out of his mind

  • @ThazuaBlackarrow I'm pretty sure Megadeth's new albums are really fucking good. Of coruse he sucked dick back in Risk. But jesus christ Endgame was more than decent.

  • @ThazuaBlackarrow Are you trying to say Megadeth's last album isn't one of their best?

  • @Uzzie101 That is what he's saying. But I don't agree. Endgame might suck in comparison to Rust in Peace, but then, everything does!

  • @diebydeath Endgame is BRILLIANT but Rust In Peace is the best metal record I've ever heard.

  • Not really a fan of the Beatles.

  • @HaggenPagan26 Nobody's perfect

  • @stfwho LOL! You have to be perfect to like the Beatles? Ah no! Most Beatles fans grew up with them, and had it shoved down their throats as children.

  • @HaggenPagan26 Many beatles fans today weren't alive when John Lennon died. They were superb musicians, even if they were inclined to pop.

  • @stfwho They were good, not the best.

  • @HaggenPagan26

    THANK GOD!!!!! FINALLY

    Some who also thinks they were overrated. I mean, they wearn't the worst, but still....

  • @brightlights456X His point is that drugs are good because they have been responsible for great music such as The Beatles.

  • @PeshwariNaan

    I know. That doesn't mean I have to like them.

  • @PeshwariNaan Drugs were not responsible for the Beatles great music. The Beatles were responsible for the Beatles great music. Perhaps some adult beverages and medications lifted their inhibitions a bit and allowed for just a bit more creativity.

  • @eqsmooth So we do have drugs to thank for the beetles is what ur saying..

  • @commanderdouche  No, I don't think so. I have no idea what they took. Mushrooms, acid, pot? Listen, base your comments on INFO and FACTS. If I knew what they imbibed then I would have mentioned it. I play music well, only sober, but that isn't true for everyone.

  • @commanderdouche No, I do not know what rugs they did: mushrooms, pot, acid, cocaine? Listen, comment w/facts and information. I don't claim anything. It could have been positive, the effect whatever drugs they took or not. All I know is that the only Beatle to die directly as result from an addiction to drugs was George. I believe he smoked himself to death. There are great musicians who cannot function w/o caffeine. alcohol or nicotine.

  • @brightlights456X Your lights are very DIM, asshole.

  • @eqsmooth

    A man young ladies....such a man! You have such a way with words kind sir.

  • @brightlights456X Thank you.

  • @eqsmooth

    Marry me.

  • @HaggenPagan26 No one needs to be a FAN-atic, but if you can't apprecate their harmonies, melodies and lyrics you are just plain one stupid mother fucker. You can't help it. it is a genetic thing.

  • @eqsmooth Ok troll.

  • @HaggenPagan26 I wo't let you get away w/that because you don't know what a troll is or what good music is. You wrote something stupid to get a reaction when the Bill Hicks is not really talking about the Beatles. That is trolling. He is talking about controlled substances. I've written plenty here and am never wasting my time trolling, fuck head.

  • Comment removed

  • @eqsmooth What an intolerant prick you are. I state an opinion, so now you think you can take apart my character and assume that my musical taste is bad. You are incredibly pretentious and you sound like a Charlatan.

  • @HaggenPagan26 I am condescending, NOT pretentious and absolutely correct most of the time. BTW, charlatan is never capitalized unless someone takes it as a name. you should look up the meaning of the word. You not only misspelled it, you used it inappropriately. You're the prick.

  • @eqsmooth Actually I spelled it properly ass face. Secondly, I doubt you are right about much of anything.

  • hahah this is great xD

  • The saddest people i ever see are those who do lots of drugs because they think it somehow makes them more like lennon or harrison or mcartney etc. Meanwhile they are only wannabees with messed up minds who live in their own fantasy world

  • @MissTeenPregnancy pompus republican wanker

    drugs are good m'kay drugs are good

    and DONT FUCKING REPLY!!!

  • he's wrong actually... John Lennon was real reeeeeeal high...

  • The Beatles and Bill Hicks two of my favorite things and both did drugs would ya know

  • Ay viletree are you sure the beatles suck? Kuz im pretty sure one of the band members fucked your mother like a filthy whore when she was young n hip. Ha

  • 11 people got no sense of humor!

  • The Beatles suck.

  • @viletree LOL the beatles suck, the most uneducated statement ever. LOL.

  • @viletree: What the fuck? You are RETARDED.

  • @viletree Alright, make like Kurt Cobain, put a fucking shotgun to your skull, and pull the trigger you idiot. You are a waste of human life, and deserves to die. Don't keep reading this comment, no go on... What the fuck are you waiting on? Fucking do it already!

  • But goatees do...

  • Moustaches don't effect your mindset douchebag

  • They also had moustaches when they wrote a lot of their best stuff. Are we also attributing great music to facial hair?

  • Beethoven — off his tits on poppers when he wrote his 9th.

  • Funny thing us Ringo didn't write that.

  • @lukeobrien02 You're right. Ringo only sang lead vocals on 'Yellow Submarine'. He did write 'Octopus's Garden', so maybe Bill just got his aquatic themed Beatles songs mixed up.

  • @CoolerKing37 he sang on octopus garden as well. he all so sang on act naturally

  • @CoolerKing37 he sang on octopus's garden and also on act naturally

  • Why don't you all shut the fuck up and watch the video?

  • @dave8594 Why don't you stop acting like you're above everybody by being a mediator of arguments and not look at the comments, (in your words) shut the fuck up and watch the video?

  • @Suargify Well played sir.

  • 0:24 Fucking lost it.

  • paul wrote it not ring sorry billy

  • He's totally correct in probably a very high percentage of artists, who can be exposed to what is available and not try something?, Marie and Donny Osmond?

  • Thats Banter!

  • He's not funny.

  • @kaakatin You like Meshuggah.

  • @Flea817 Ah that's the reason I don't find him funny. Too much Meshuggah has melted my brain. Well don't worry, I'm listening to Nile now.

  • @kaakatin No! You must listen to more Meshuggah!

  • @eGreg24 Listen to more Meshuggah it says. Listen to more Meshuggah I will.

  • If you're getting high to replace being sober - then you have reality/identity issues.

    there needs to be some form or shape of balance.

  • lol@drugs not making you creative!

    Tell that to rock n roll

  • sooo true... ;-).....

  • Now it is time to listen to Tool.

  • "when you get the message, hang up the phone"

    -some smart fuking guy who developed chaos theory talking about drugs...."the REAL guy from a Beautiful Mind"

  • @nso1256 there is a balance to it all man...you can't just over glorify drugs, especially the ones that turn you into a junkie....look at Jim Carrol, His poetry and music wouldn't have existed if he wouldn't have recovered and made it out of the 'gutter'

  • Meh, drugs don't make you creative. If drugs will make you a successfull artist, explain all those junkies dying in the gutter. Also, example: Frank Zappa was famously opposed to drugs and he wrote some of the best, weirdest and most difficult and innovative music of the last 50 or 60 years (at least). AND he was funnier than Bill Hicks. The whole drugs = creativity shtick is just a convenient bullshit story for people who really just wanna get wasted.

    PS: The Beatles? Hugely overrated boyband.

  • @MassExtinctionEvent Please read a book. Psychedelics literally open your mind. Take LSD once and your life will change when you find yourself realizing things about life you couldn't quite realize before. Drugs might not be the thing that separates the bums from the rockstars, but damn it sure helps. Its no coincidence most of our greatest artists were drug users. The Beatles were not "overrated", they made some incredible revolutionary sound in their second half and they changed the world.

  • @stfwho Just to offer a counterpoint somewhat...John Lennon said that drugs allowed him to focus on writing his music, but the drugs themselves ...according to him...were not exactly the catalyst...

  • @ack303 John Lennon made a lot of great quotes, I read a new one so often its surprising

  • @MassExtinctionEvent Have you listened to any Beatles songs not from their first several albums? Whether you like them or not, your ears would have to be broken to compare the music from Abbey Road/Sgt. Pepper's with a boy band. Frank Zappa is also great, though.

    As someone who doesn't like smoking weed much, there has literally never been a single weed "junkie dying in the gutter." You can't become physically addicted to weed. Comparing it with opiates is absurd.

  • @Massiveshithead So wrong, so uneducated. ZAPPA was the biggest nicotine addict ever. He died from CANCER. HE CHAMPIONED SMOKING AND OPPOSED ANTI-TOBACCO ADVERTISING. If you think he didn't use cigarettes & coffee to write that incredibly sophisticated music you are deluded.

    Beatles an over rated boy band? Are you trollin' for a Mississippi Beat Down? Music from the 70's on up would not be what it is w/o them. Greatest pop band ever. Under rated. WTF? Who dropped you on your head? Fuckin' shit!

  • how can drugs get so ignorent after what he just said??? WTF IS WRONG IN WORLDDDDDDDDDD

  • Salvidor Dali said - " I dont do drugs, I am drugs"

  • Uppers were definately silly..

    White album contained great stuff ... but how much better might it have been if they were not stoned.. down hill after that..

    Band on the Run.. come on > what a pale shadow of what the beatles used to be..

  • "but how much better might it have been if they were not stoned" - Says who? You're speculating, that doesn't prove anything. Its just as easy to say "think how bad they would have been if they hadn't taken drugs". The fact is that they took drugs right the way through their time as a band, and they're generally considered to be the best band that ever existed. So how much "better" do you think they could have been? And Band on The Run is a critically acclaimed, great album

  • @MrSyrett

    Roman Polanski is the greatest film director of all time but could still have managed that without taking young girls to bed.

    People in hospital are much more likely to die in the near future than those driving fast cars at speed without a seat belt.

    Please do not confuse cause and effect.. or just things that happen to happen at the same time.

    It is more than just speculation to say that people who habitualy put strange chemicals into their minds might end up wasting their lives

  • @suziecreamchease - Two completely inane and irrelevant analogies there. Im not confusing cause and effect because I have never said that Drugs result in creativity with anyone. Just as I have not denied they can be a destructive force as well as a creative one. Nice strawman though.

    Artists draw from their experiences - good and bad. And drugs have always provided the most surreal experiences. This has been true from Coleridge and Keats, to John Lennon and Brain Wilson.

  • The difference between artists and those who "waste their life", is that they have the ability to interpret these experiences into something creative. Often the more intense an experience, the more significant the result. The same is true of other experience of the human condition - love, loss etc.

    Again, artists take the inspirations from various places, and not always good ones. So who are you to say for definate Polanski would be exactly the same film maker had he not slept with young girls?

  • @MrSyrett

    seems like we are in agreement..

    all i would say is once an experience becomes a habit, it is no longer a new experience but an alternative to being fully alive.. and unfortunately that is the case today with most people who take chemical amusements.. and seems to have become the case of too many artists who have used them in the past.

  • @MrSyrett If he has to sleep with little girls to make his movies, he's not the greatest film maker of all time. He's a piece of shit. I say the same thing about Edgar Allan Poe, if he needed the drugs to write his stories, he's by far not even one of the greatest. Lovecraft managed to do it without drugs.

    Looking at Hick's words carefully, drugs CAN do some good things. Can. Just like, you can hit the lottery. You can catch a fish. You can kill a bear with a knife.

  • @MrSyrett and in closing, just because you can, doesn't mean you will.

  • Comment removed

  • @NeoFusion85

    well yes .. goes without saying an opinion about the quality of a film director is an opinion..

    In my case an honest opinion based largely on my observationsand thoughts.. rather than entirely a consideration of whether any other number of film critics would say the same.

    Please explain what it is meant by "coffee table quality" i think when putting forward an argument it is more important to use logic ra