Added: 5 years ago
From: chatoXvato
Views: 254,164
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,465)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the russians would have won if all they had was a shoe on a stick

  • @andymick1011 lol and a potato. 

  • fuck communist russia, the nazis were the good guys

  • @FightTheSerpents Neither were very good, mate. Both were rather evil, in my opinion.

  • FASCISM AND A 4TH REICH WILL RISE AGAIN! 14/88

  • Germans don t need guns,now they think that their economy is enough but they fucked

  • Не надо думать, что советские солдаты воевали под Сталинградом без оружия как это иногда показывают в кино. Многие советские командиры командовали своими своими частями без оглядки на коммунистическое руководство, и именно на передовой ощущали настоящую свободу.

    И еще... не одна победа не достигается со страхом в сердце, и советские солдаты шли в бой не из-за пулеметов за их спинами.

  • How much russian heroes i heared there was there...

    when dragovich said that the people that will go back, will shot, he wasn't kidding, who walk back, they shot him.

  • The hardest and toughest battle in history respect to the soldiers who fought there and especially the russians, because they defeated those fascists and prevented them from further ruling!

  • 62 PEOPLE ARE NAZIS.

    

  • Let us remember the brave Soviet, American, British, and many other soldiers who gave their lives to keep Europe from control of the Fascists

  • yep we killed all our men and women so that fucking arabs could live in the empty houses and schools

  • general winter won the war not stupid vodka head russians won it ! HEİL WEHRMACHT !

  • @ozanberke1993 Dumb ass, this battle begined in august. WTF general winter in summer? Anyway in winter frost attacks both sides.

  • Thanks to the French kameradam! We are mindful of the Normandie-Niemen "! ))

  • For Russia!!!!

  • Germans are NOT GERMANIC people, IN Y-DNA GERMANS ARE CELTS!!! At germans in DNA doesn't dominate german haplogroup I1, at germans dominates celtic haplogroup R1b ht tp://w w w. eupedia. com/europe/european_y-dna_hapl­ogroups. shtml

    World War 2 in Germans vs russians, NOT WAs: germanic people vs slavs, it was: CELTS (germans and austrians) vs SCANDINAVIAN VIKINGS(RUSSIANS). After all russians have occurred from vikings.

  • russia win wars by losing territory to the enemy

  • @menatwar It doesnt matter how you win war,as long as you win it

  • Those Germans who surrendered had no idea what was in store for them. Out of the tens of thousands of German POW's only a few hundred every returned to Germany! They should have fought to the last man!

  • @mrbeatnikjd No the Russians should had butchered them for dog food.

  • @mrbeatnikjd Idiot. Most of them were heavy injured, or starved, or hard-frozen. When germans surrendered most of them were almost dead, no one could save them.

  • the problem was,depending where you were born you could be classed as a German citizen,this happened in Alsace-Lorraine which were once French departments but were taken over by the Germans in 1940 ,many a Frenchman ended up in the German army by conscription

  • "Wer zu uns (nach Rusland) mit dem Schwert kommt, so wird der durchs Schwert fallen! So stand und wird das russische Land stehen!" - sagte Novgoroder Fürst Alexander Newski als Warnung an die Botschafter des Deutschen Ordens, die zu Aleksander Newski nach der sogenannten Schlacht auf dem Eise (Schlacht auf dem Peipussee) im Sommer 1242 nach Weliki Nowgorod (Groß-Nowgorod) kamen, um ihn um "den ewigen Frieden" bitten.

  • thank god for all the allies..im American, and we all played our part in ww2 allie or axis. give respect to all who fought.

  • @kp7100

    THANK YOU THAT YOU STILL WITH US. I am here because of you.

    What do you think, democracy comminism could savour humanity?

    Natural capitalism is big market. All could be sold. I dont want that people will live in that system further.

  • @TheTimurbest idk what you really mean but i like the American way now, its worked for us so why not,.

  • so sorry we still can't see the light and history THAT repeats it's self of hate of Hitler, G.W.Bush

  • My Great Grandpa he was a german in stalingrad. He was a radio operator in a plane and he flew over stalingrad. One time there were soviet planes so he had to get on an MG42

  • German soldiers deserve no honor, they deserve to burn in hell.

  • @strongman325 No! German soldiers deserve honor as any other soldier.

  • @MrHogGamer It looks as if you don't know how the german soldiers acted and what they did. They deserve no honor, they deserve to burn in hell.

  • @strongman325 What about Soviet soldiers murdering Polish army officers and raping thousands of German women?

  • @MrHogGamer Did I say I condone thier behavior? And Poland was oppressed by the NKVD and Soviet government, the Soviet people were murdered just as much by the Stalinist regime as any other ethnicity. I don't give a fuck about the German women, they supported Hitler, they believed in him until the end, and they got what they deserved. What about the 200,000 civilians slaughtered in 63 days in the 1944 Warsaw Uprising, I don't see any Germans commemorating that, why should I care about them?

  • @strongman325 You think that German soldiers were the only ones to commit crimes? They weren't. Believe me when I say this, I hated that WWII happened. Millions of Europeans killed. And you should care about German women, Swedish women, French women, and the other European women. Maybe you should forget about this war that happened almost 70 years ago and prepare for the war to come. The fight against Islam and multiculturalism in Europe.

  • @MrHogGamer I never said Germans were the only ones who committed crimes. That's like the milionth time I've heard a German point the finger at others. That's all you do, is point the finger and don't take any blame, that's why so many people hate Germans. I don't care about the German women, once again, they supported their fuhrer, they got what they bargained for.

  • @strongman325 Would you not support your leader in a time of war? The Poles were mistreating ethnic Germans and threatening to kill them. And to take back German lands in which the Poles refused to return. I'm not blaming anyone, not even the Germans. The Jewish bankers and financiers had a hand in starting that war. Besides, maybe a German will save your life one day, or you may become friends with one. By the way, Polish women are very attractive.

  • @MrHogGamer You misunderstanc my point completely, and you stray towards pointing fingers. I didn't say I hate Germans, I go to germany every year where my father works, I have German friends, however that doesn't take away what Germany as a nation did in world war 2. Lol, Jewish bankers? In case you didn't know, 99% of jews who were killed were regular people, innocent, women, men, and children. It was Polish land taken from Poland by Prussia.

  • @strongman325 Okay, you obviously don't know about Jews do you? They control the banks and finances. Whoever controlls a countries banks and finances controls the country. Maybe you should educate yourself on Jews. And you speak of the Jews being regular and innocent women, men, and children. What about the millions innocent Russian men, women, and children that were murdered by Jewish Bolshevism in the USSR? Why do Jews get off innocent for their crimes? Think about that. will you?

  • @strongman325 And you do know there were Polish SS and Jewish SS right? Just like there was many other SS units from other European countries. They don't teach you that in Polish schools do they? I bet they don't, nor in any European schools. Learn your history my friend.

  • @MrHogGamer "Jewish Bolshevism", another nazi propaganda term, you realize you aren't talking to someone born yesterday right? And actually no, there were no Polish SS divisions formed, as they didn't have enough polish volunteers to form one. There were Jewish bankers, just like there were German bankers, and there were Jewish housemaids, just like there were German housemaids. What's you're point. Do you believe in this whole "Jewish conspiracy" crap, you're such a gullible little child.

  • @strongman325 Nazi propaganda? Look up the Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution, you'll see. And yes, I realize you weren't born yesterday. And maybe not Polish SS divisions, but there were Polish SS. And you talk about Jewish housmaids and bankers. Jews are just as foreign to Europe as Arabs and blacks are. Also, before Hitler took power, Jews controlled 90% of German banks and finances. And I want you to tell me everything you know about the "Jewish conspiracy". See if you know anything.

  • @MrHogGamer I never said Jews didn't hold positions of power, so did Russians, so did Ukrainians, you're argument proves nothing really. I'd like to see your sources for everything you're saying, especially the part "Jews controlled 90% of German banks and finances". That is another Nazi propaganda term. So tell me why didn't the Gernab economy plummet to the depths if in a few short years 90% of the nation's banks and finances were wiped out? You keep spewing Nazi propaganda at me boy.

  • @strongman325 Who are you calling a boy? I've been respectful to you my Polish friend. You just seem so naive about Jews and their role. It's okay though, I bet they don't teach any of this in Poland, the Jews you see, they control it all. Hitler kept the German economy going by a barter type system, and not through banks, because the Jews have that. It's not Nazi propaganda friend, it's the truth.

  • @MrHogGamer It's Nazi propaganda. And if someone owns a bank or a company or a corporation, it's not because they arew Jewish, it is because they are good at what they do. "They control it all", more bullshit Jewish conspiracy theory and nazi propaganda crap. "Giving it away"? We live in a free society, and Europeans are opening their arms to other ethnicites and nationalities, and I support it. We are all humans, we should live together, not create makeshift divisions that tear us apart.

  • @MrHogGamer There weren't even any Polish SS units. Yea there were a few Polish SS, and in the Wehrmacht too(towards the end of the war they were drafted), but many of them were Poles with German roots, and the amount of Poles who collaborated with the Germans is by far the smallest of any German-Occupied country in world war 2. What's your point? Every nation has traitors. Still doesn't hide the truth that the Germans couldn't even find enough Polish volunteers for an SS brigade.

  • @strongman325 I'm not saying their were Divisions or anything, but their were some Polish SS. And why do you call them traitors? There are traitors in power in Europe now, who are giving it away to blacks, Arabs, and multiculturalism. Europe won't even be European in a short time. Maybe I shall visit Poland and you can show me the sites. Would you do that?

  • @MrHogGamer People in power today aren't traitors lol. How can you compare a Pole in the SS, to somebody in political power in Europe in terms a treachery. You are a complete retard, and have no idea what you're talking about. You're completely brainwashed by neo-nazis and white supremacists.

  • @MrHogGamer And no I would not support a leader that mruders innocent men, women, and children even if there was war.

  • Russian pigs!

  • I know. this is hero city

  • FOR MOTHER RUSSIA 

  • the battle that decided the war in europe

  • yes and then they were cought and went into gulags in Sibirien. Mnay died. their noses and ears fell up because they were frozen. They got flees and were starving. These men who made it home after 7 years went to work for their families. These men were some sort of heros. Their wifes were at home and then some kids were born and locked up or not brought up,......????

  • @zackota63 A pity really...so few people can actually grasp what happened on the eastern front in world war 2, and what happened in the eastern bloc for decades after...people have no clue what kind of tyranny it was...they think their freedom didn't cost anybody anything...they are wrong.

  • Makes me happy to be celebrating a christmas in peace. The worst thing Ive read about this battle was Goebbels having alot of the last post destroyed as it contained negative feelings and thoughts....it was those doomed guys last chance to say goodbye to their families....

  • can't believe something like this ever happened. World War II seems like a movie. Could never imagine something like that happening today.

  • It is a pity that now many think that the American army has won Hitler. Holiwood shoots good films about private soldier Rajene. Only losses of America 360000, and Russia 27000000. They were killed by nazis, instead of Stalin. However and the Georgian genius too has tried...

  • I like germans they were mean and all but im part german and they have cool helmets

  • @uglydollsinc123 Most of the german uniforms were designed by Hugo Boss. thats why them Nazi's always looked so fucking stylish man !

  • @StolenMonkey lol I see.

  • @uglydollsinc123 Lol, they have cool helmets so that justifies to "mean", what you call. Lining up entire families, women and children by the hundreds in front of firing squads. Are you a fool?

  • @strongman325 Yes mam.

  • @uglydollsinc123 Dumbass.

  • @strongman325 Yes mam.

  • long life to Russia !

    greetings from France =)

  • @rempageable Thank you, long life to France!

  • @rempageable I appreciate your brown-nosing, but don't forget that France attacked Russia only 129 years before the Germans did.

  • @rempageable Очень спасибо мой друг!

  • @rempageable yet who who was the one that landed at your country to save YOUR ass, and all of europes asses during the war? The USA, Canada, and Britain. The Russians didnt do SHIT to help your country.

    greeting from the us of a bitch.

  • @StuntedSnail never mind..USA,canada,Britain = fucking countries..Russia is the best

  • @rempageable cheeky cunt.

  • @rempageable If Russia is so great how come their standard of living and Human Development Index is so low? Its below countries like Mexico and Serbia.

  • Remember the sacrifice that the Russians paid to dig into the dirt and push back Deutschland back from within it's self therefore remember their bravery as they faced the previously indomitable Blitzkrieg tactic.

  • the conditions at Stalingrad for both sides were terrible, they had no TV or anything like that.

  • @robertodowneso u suck

  • if it werent for stalins new order "not 1 step backwards or you will be shot" stalingrad would of not been taken and i beleve if it werent for the russians the allies from the west would of lost cause after the soviet victory in stalingrad the russians gained more confedence in winnig and they marched and fought al the way to berlin many respects to the died soviet soldiers who fought for their"motherland" and i respect them cause they died if they went forward or back so yeah..

  • This battle was a turning point in the entire war

  • holy crap jude law fought in ww2

  • Some very striking shots that I've not seen anywhere else. I think it's worth pointing up the expression 'the tide turned', the Russians mounted a huge pincer operation (which the Germans believed they could not do), and the consequence was that the German 6th Army was defeated and that, one or two battles apart, the Germans were on the retreat consistently thereafter.

  • great video. Awesome and I sure enjoyed em. Thanks. I want more!!

  • do never forget the enemy who fight to survive and return back to thair childeren and wife by_'' by emir

    i meen every one looks the bad side of germans but they gaven orders if thy dident except they exucuted secondly not every german is evel they helped meny meny 10000 americans and russians

  • wolgograd should be named back in stalingrad, for rememberance. all other shit like zarazin and volgograd is embarrassing for this important city.......

  • @sdkfz162kingtiger yes but I dont think Russia doesnt want any part of Stalin

  • not only Germans fought there. Also SS volunteers from Holland, Belgium, Norway etc etc. Don't blame only Germans.

  • honor them! Russian and German soldiers as well.

  • @alexfromportland Stalingrad a scumbag so ta

  • @alexfromportland funny guy german are motherfuckers

  • @alexfromportland screw the german's and then i mean the nazi's, german resistance is ok in my opinion, but seriously why honour them? they started 2 worldwar's and lost both, i can say so much about this but i wont, cause 1) my english isnt that good so it wouldnt make allot of sence prob. and 2) youtube doesnt give me more than 500 signs.

  • @barrowscasper12

    you see, my friend, i never said honor German nazi politians of that time. i was talking about German soldiers I than ain't the same in my book. FYI, my English isn't good either and i am Russian.

  • @alexfromportland you know you can say the german soldiers just did what was told to them but i dont belive that. we all have a choice too make and it was THEIR choice too fight, and they should take responsibility for it and not be some lame pussyface that say's "they told me it was for the right cause"

  • Thank you Heroes

  • @fockjock, Some people simply don't realize the magnitude of WWII nor the fact that it was a global war. Stalin was planning to attack Shitler but Shitler beat him to the punch. Stalin also had no legitimate reasons to attack Finland, invade Poland, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, & Rumania & then imprison, exile/deport to the USSR, & kill well over 1-million of the citizens of these nations in a very short span of less than 2-years.

  • @christof139

    Yes well we can agree on that.Natioanl Socialism was a counter revolutionary force and Hitler as we all know was created by events that were probably best considered an extension of ww1.

    Who knows where Stalin would have stopped had Hitler not existed..

  • @fokjock, Shitler was a simple opportunist that took advatage of economic problems, resentment, ethnic BS, for his own means.

  • @christof139

    Yes, and didn't you forget to add a bit more? eg the threat from Communism in the East, unfair treatment at Versailles."Simple opportunist" are not the words that come to mind when describing the man that was the biggest mover and cause of destruction in history-simple is an adjective that would describe your analysis.

  • @fockjock, We also gave HUGE amounts of supplies, raw materials, equipment & sent thousands of technicians to our Allies such as Britain, China, USSR, France, Australia, etc., which also hindered equipping our own forces. Not anyone disputes that the majority of Nazi ground forces were on the East Front, nor belittles the human sacrifice of ALL the peoples of the former USSR, & also the AK in Poland & the Partisans throughout Europe.

  • @christof139 ,

    Yes you gave, but not for free-use of British territory, and the financial cost to Britain was enormous.

    It certainly was not free.

  • @fokjock, The financial cost to Britain was small & ALL our Allies were given the same small interest rates with ~60 or so years to payback (whatever the years were) at ~2% interest rate. Churchill said it was the best deal ever made. We had to pay for the rental of bases from our Allies & reverse lend-lease was used to do this.

  • @christof139

    The cost was so large it took until 2006 to pay it-loss was of territory as well as financial

  • @fokjock, British payments for lend Lease were ~$83.3-million/year or so over a period of 50-years, with a few deferred payments in there.

    BTW, the USA also was working on the rocket-propelled Gargoyle, & the Felix, an infrared guided (IR seeker in nose) GP bomb with guidance fins in the tail, & it was successfully tested & went into produciton in 1945 but never made it into combat.

  • @christof139

    Yes, but the territory the USA took for their co-operation was price too far to pay for the loss of influence this country suffered as a result.

  • @fokjock, Oh, & how much territory was that?

  • @christof139

    I don't need to know the actual figures for the cost of L-L.-I can google that anytime and it less than impressive to see you produce those figures

  • @fokjock, Then quit complaining & acting as if the USA ripped-off mercantile, wheeling & dealing, greedy old England.

  • @christof139

    Considering your country is considered the greediest bunch of slobs on the planet dishing out more pollution than just about anybody else-you as an individual with your flatulent asshole epitomise-this-don't believe England has a look in that regard.

  • @fokjock, Greedy slobs you say the USA is considered the worst? I think not, Britain has had that reputation for a long time: introduced African slavery on a large scale to what became the USA, cheated & plundered countries worldwide during its long exploitive, imperialistic, colonial, & rascist period, etc. Slobs = Brit soccer fans that riot in other nations.

  • @christof139

    Churchill would have said that at the time he was a desperate man

  • @fokjock, Only 3-nations paid us back as far as I know: Britain, Denmark, & Norway & the USSR partially paid us back. Bush & Putin got together & the rest of the debt was forgiven, gone, because of the USSR's great contribution to the war effort etc. We also forgave the debt for other smaller Allied nations.

  • @fokjock, Used Lend-Lease equipment & supplies were also returned to the USA by the Allies & the cost of those items was deducted from their debt. The purpose of Lend-Lease was not to make money but to help the Allies.

  • @christof139

    Yes, but it made money in the process.

  • @fokjock, The USA did not make money from Lend Lease, except from the 3 nations that paid us back, & all other nations' debts were erased. The USA also gave uranium to the USSR for its nuclear weapons research - just shows that we were good allies until Stalin started his BS & then started the Cold War.

  • @christof139

    No, they made 2% interest surely? anyway, yes Britain gave away its jet engine technology to both the USA and the USSR .

    To be honest the USA were completely duped by Stalin.Eisenhower and Roosevelt in particular had no idea what was in store.Churchill was more astute,his Fulton speech was significant-but then again Josef Goebells even more so, his clairvoyance referring to "Ein eiserner Vorhang" a full year before Churchill.

    Needless to say the latter did not mention his source..

  • @fokjock, USA had its own jet engine technology & had a small operational unit of jets in Italy, & they had only one engine in the fuselage & were as fast as an Me-262 & faster than the Meteor 1.

    USA did not make money off of Lend Lease since we forgave most nations debts. As Churchill said, it was the best deal ever made.

  • @christof139

    tell me, when was it that the USA had its own jet technology?-what date aare we talking about, which engine?-oh, and the USA did make gain out of its lend lease with Britain, both financially, and by use of its territory.

  • @fokjock, The jet was the XP-80 & it first used a British jet engine that was then improved by General Electric, & the airframe etc. was made by Lockheed. First jet engines were invented by Hans von Ohain & Sir Frank Whittle.

    J. Walter Christie of New Jersey, USA made the first decent tank with sloped armor & the Christie suspension that the Soviets used for the BT tank series & then the T-34.

  • @christof139

    Yes, you got it right, it was a BRITISH engine-and there was me thinking you had your OWN programme.

    Should have thought about that before you Googled shouldn't you?

    You had no idea that it was the Brits who first came up with the idea when you wrote your earlier flawed piece about your "own" programme did you??- inferring you develped the jet engine independently Typical thick insular American ignorance.

  • @fokjock, I knew it was british dummy, we just improved it like Packard improved the Merlin-Rolls & mass produced. Brits. used much USA equipment so you are in no position to brag, but that just shows the world what an ass you are.

  • @christof139

    If you knew it was British, wtf were you talking about your "own program" for??-you had none, other than the technology the Brits provided for you.You opened your big gobshit mouth as usual no doubt and then belatedly realised what an asshole you had made yourself out to be.

  • @fokjock, Excuse please, it was our 'own program' because we improved the Brit jet engine & the rest of the plane was developed in the USA. Similar to the Brits putting a 17pdr in a Sherman.

    Hey fag brain, you have a problem, I 'd simply end your presence here on earth regardless of your 230-lbs etc. BS.

    You are an idiot. Your using the term 'microphallus' proves where your brain is at.

  • @fokjock, I have no problem giving credit where credit is due, but you do. On boobtube here my comments state the the brits were responsible for the first major Allied victories over the Axis in 1939-41 in both East & North Africa, that it was the Brit developemnt of the cavity magnatron that allowed short wave radar units to be used to defeat the U-boats, after the device was given to the USA for mass production, cont'd.

  • @fokjock, & that Britain contributed tremendously to the Allied war effort. I even tell some of my big mouthed fellow USAers to shut-up. You simply enjoy goading people from the USA, & perhaps someday you will learn to shut you silly arrogant mouth.

  • @fokjock, I am also in my late 50's, not of good health for various reasons, have served in the military with WWII veterans, & people like you I have not time for. You are a simple agitator that someday may probably get hurt bad for running your mouth & threatening people etc., or maybe even killed very quickly by someone that is not playing games like you are.

    BTW, yeah, I have been to a few places in the world where you will never go.

  • @christof139

    Sorry to hear of your poor health but probably because like many Americans you are overindulgent not only with your food but with your overinflated ego.You come on here thinking you are gods gift to WW2 with all sorts of facts+figures, then you come across someone who does know what their talking about and all of a sudden you have the proverbial egg all over you.You use the word "simple" often -is that because most often how others refer to you?-because that is how you come across?

  • @christof139

    What you places in the world like brothels of Bangkok?-yes your probably right, who knows what deviance you satisfied out there.

  • @fokjock, You mentioned them so you must have been to them. Ha ha ha!! You're quite the self-righteous little moron.

  • @christof139

    Remember, little is the adjective that refers to 2 things:your penis and your brain lard ass.

  • @fokjock, Fact: The USSR Yak-3 may have been the best dogfighter of WWII, & was the only Allied plane that the Luftwaffe command ordered its pilots not to engage.

    Fact: The USA 90mm firing HVAP was the equal of & even surpassed the Brit 17pdr in certain aspects such as rate of fire, etc.

    Fact: The USA long 76.2mm was slightly superior to the USSR 85mm when firing HVAP as stated by USSR weapons tetsers etc.

  • @christof139

    Facts -we all know you can use a search engine, but in the intellect stakes you are perhaps at the imbecile level.Your searches are meaningless when you have no ideas of your own about how the war progressed.I can do a search on the Yak anytime, I can tell you its engine size, armament etc etc , but SO WHAT?

  • @fokjock, I have never stated on Boobtube that the USA won the war etc. all by its lonesome & we were never taught that, & I have just posted a few things that definitely prove otherwise, & I always show respect to our Allies, but I show none to arrogant, immature, know-it-all jackasses like yourself that have trouble reading & realizing that there are many people in this world that do not fit into your pathetic, biased, subjective prejudices & mental mania.

  • @christof139

    No, you came on here to show-off what you thought was the breadth of your "knowledge" of WW2 by use of internet searches and fell flat on you doubtless fat, flatulent ass.

    Boing boing!-your stll bouncing dork!

  • @fokjock, No, you fell flat on your sick little brain.

    Fact: The USA Christie tank was the grandad of the Soviet BT series & the T-34 with regards to the suspension system & sloped frontal armor.

    Fact: The USA did indeed improve upon the Brit jet engine & the airframe etc. in the XP-80 etc. was USA designed.

    Fact: The Brits put 17pdr in USA Sherman tanks, & USA 75mm derivatives in Churchills etc.

    Fact: The USA did improve the merlin-Rolls & mass produce it in large numbers.

    etc.

  • @christof139

    You don't show repect your allies-you have a sub text to your posts which underlined your confused self image of superiority and that of your country-your comment on the jet engine being but one example.When pointed out how you were hoist by your own petard , had to confess you used British technology.

  • @fokjock, Excuse me penile brain, I have served with our Allies, have known many people from that time, & have respect for them. You must confess that the Brits were behind in many things & are not the sole saviors of the world during WWII. You are the one that gives not any credit to anyone else except Britain. Therefore, that makes you a complete ass that refuses to accept historical facts. I have no problem accepting historical facts, you do.

  • @christof139

    No you served with the "Salvation" Army and when it comes to weapons, you wouldn't know your asshole from your elbow.You are a couch potato sat back with your triple cheesburger and coke watching programmes like "Combat" in genuine belief that you are watching the history of the Western front , 1944.

    You are correct in that I don't give credit to braggards who present internet search results as their own views on war and that ignorance should be deferred to.

  • @christof139

    Well penile brain I suppose is better than the tertiary stage syphillitic cerebellum that inhabits that balding skull of yours.

    I guess you would say that it was result of all the imaginary wars you fought in the brothels of Bangkok? tee hee!

  • @ Fokjock, That's the best insult yet. I served from 1970-73 & a coupe of short periods after, last time in1991. Yeah, I actually did serve with fellows that fought in the infantry in WWII, & trained with NATO allied troops.

    Lennin had syphillis, not me. You must have the English Pox.

  • @christof139

    Oh by the way educated one, I think you'll find "Lennin" is spelled Lenin! -ho ho!

  • @fokjock, Big deal, a typo Mr. Moron. You too make typos. At your 'old' age of 40 or so I bet you never did much of anything & as for your tirade of handling a Bren etc., I can only laugh.

  • @fokjock, BTW, you should visit Windsor, Ontario, canada & run your mouth there of Brit superiority at everything, as there were 2 Inf. Bns. from the Windsor area at Dieppe. Visit Dieppe Gardens first, then go to the Royal Canadian Legion Hall - if they let you in - & start running your mouth, perhaps a Dieppe vet. will be there to tell you to shut-up, & then your arrogant self will be thrown out. Then you could go try at the Royal Canadian Armoured Corps Association lodge & get booted again.

  • @christof139

    Why would I visit Ontario fudpucker?-really.I guess speaking open gobs, assholes like you are told to shut-up on a daily basis.

    There is no argument to the pish you spout, it's all nonsense.

  • @fokjock, Initially, I made the comment that the USA Christie tank design was basically the 'grandad' of the Soviet BT & T-34 series tanks, which it was, including both its suspension system & sloped armor. The Soviets improved the design over the years.

  • @fokjock, Someone stated that the USSR was the only nation to produce diesel engined tanks in WWII & I stated that the USA produced thousands of diesel engined M3-Lees (over 1,300), M4 Shermans (M4A2 & M4A6) & supplied the USSR with both M3 & M4 & we used some of the diesel engined Shermans in the Pacific. Some USA Stuarts also used radial diesel engines. Britain had Leyland diesels in Matilda II, Valentine, & Cruiser tanks, Italy used a Ford diesel in its M13/40 series, & Japan used diesels.

  • @fokjock, You are the one that needs to learn respect for others, & especially to quit knocking the USA as you do. I bet a lot of people would enjoy correcting your slimey manners. I bet you also knock the French for not any reason.

    So, you are proved wrong again & again.

    Here Bozo, have a listen on Boobtube: Battle of New Orleans, In 1814

  • @christof139

    I have no respect for know it all trygliceral armchair would be historians, beer and burger in hand-wanking cocksuckers like you that haven't the first idea of the war.

    Yes, after you having read some of my previous comments after your search, you would assume correctly about the French-but then again doubtless so would the majority of your countrymen-and for good reason.

  • @fokjock, No, I have never been booted out of a Canadian or USA etc. veterans establishment or organization, but you would be. No doubt you aren't allowed in Brit veterans' establishments & organizations either.

  • @christof139

    I don't give a flying fu@k for your "vet" establishments-isn't a "vet" someone who looks after poor dumb animals like you?

  • @fokjock, Yeah, you are dumb; you know that the abbrv. 'vet' = 'veteran'. You would be booted form many vet organizations.

    It was Whittle's & the Germans later design, however, the USA improved upon the jet engine, just as the brits put a 17pdr in a Sherman, etc. You are dense.

  • @christof139

    Vet?? ha ha you prick, I'm playing with you-what a laugh extracting the piss from you-so easy!!

  • @christof139

    No it wasn't the Germans and Whittles design you fuckwit-Frank Whittle was way out front FIRST with the design and patented in 1930 but couldn't get backing-Ohain later independently did in 1936-but the Germans were much quicker to build it

    So when you google, read it right little fat flatulent one.

  • @fokjock, We used Whittles' engine, so it was Whittle the Brits engine & not the German engine you genius.

  • @christof139

    Oh I'm glad we can agree on that then-but why the detour on a Rumanian who had nothing to do with the gas turbine engine?

  • @fokjock, The Rumanian helped lay the groundwork. It's like saying that Edison's light bulb had no influence on flourescent light bulbs.

  • @christof139

    You were presenting the Rumanian whose car engine-a"motorjet"as if he was the inventor of the first "jet" engine-absolutely ludicrous-Now, the one everyone knows to be a jet engine-he first "jet turbine design" ie the engine known as that which would bring power and speed unmatched as required by the Breguet Range equation-was that designed by Whittle in the 1920's.

    THAT was genius-before anyone, including the Germans.

  • @christof139

    No, very little could be concluded from that-priciples of a jet can be learned from a washing up liquid bottle and were first laid out mathematically by Sir Isaac Newton hundreds of year ago.The idea of compression, +compressors to create the mass flow could only come from Whittle.

  • @fokjock, Ohhhh, & just previously you stated that the German was ahead of Whittle. FYI, the technology was known & experiented with here & we would have developed our own jet engine in a year or two. Same with short wave radar, which we were close to developeing but the Brits came up with the cavity magnetron first. cont'd

  • @christof139

    No, you got it wrong again.If you understood the development of the jet engine, you would have known that Sir Frank was WAY ahead in the 1920, with his patent for the engine coming in 1930.Sadly there was bureaucracy and no funding for his work.Ohani in Germany caught up, developing his engine patent 6 YEARS later-THEN they strove ahead and built the first aircraft in 1939.

    Are you capable of understanding that, or is it beyond your capabilities?

  • @fokjock, The USA had the Bat radar guided glide bomb & Azon radio-controlled bomb, & both were used in the later stages of WWII & both were effective. The Bat was the first fire and forget guided weapon, and the first radar homing antishipping weapon & was fairly good, most adavnced of its type some people state.

  • @christof139

    Radar-another British invention by Watson-Watt taken on by the rest of the world.Yes of course the British came up first with the magnetron-and that "first" in time of war is a very big word.Second=loser

  • @fokjock, No, first rudimentary radar was invented in 1904 by Christian Hülsmeyer, then Tesla worked out some problems with it, & in 1934 American Dr. Robert M. Page tested the first monopulse radar and the Soviet military engineer P.K.Oschepkov, produced an experimental apparatus RAPID capable of detecting an aircraft within 3 km of a receiver. contd.

  • @christof139

    Oh my god, with an inevitable weariness, I turn to Wikipaedia and surprise surprise find Hulsmeyer's name, with Tesla next-ho-hum- Mr Wikishitforbrains strikes again.Sadly, your doltish conclusions are inevitably pathetic.- RADAR, -a B-R-T-I-S-H term meaning radio detection cannot apply to Hulsmeyer and Tesla was theorising-there was no ranging element and by definition requires RANGE to be a "Radar"-can't you UNDERSTAND anything??-you have no gestalt, you are one sad bastard.

  • @fokjock, You're an idiot. Of course I use Wiki & other sources. Look up: Rodman Casting Process, Submarines, Helium, use Hydrogen filled observation balloons & their impact on Count von Zeppelin; Hiram Maxim & the machinegun, Hudson Maxim, the Gatling Gun, etc. etc. No, the rudimentary radr system was lacking in range finding ability but it was the forefather of RADAR dimwit. The Brits did not invent Radar. You have no gestalt dummy.

    You are an obnoxious & ignorant person.

  • @christof139

    You still don't understand do you.Radar is a British term for radio detection and ranging.Nothing previously achieved that-geddit?

  • @christof139

    What you described was a radio detection device.Radar, was much more than that, and it helped save us in the Battle of Britain, 1940-although I doubt you'd know much about that.-it was absolutely groundbreakind and allowed the RAF to deal efficiently with the Luftwaffe.How dare somebody of your calibre try and diminish Robert Watson-Watts' achievements.

  • @fokjock, You're a moron of such low caliber it is quite pathetic. I know what RADAR is, & the fact is that the German fellow was responsible for the initial device that led to further refinement into true RADAR. So, the German fellow was the first to utilize a form of radar although it lacked range detection. You're obnoxious & boring & quite the turd.

  • @christof139

    AHHH!-WANKPIECE you're back!!--now peabrain, what you have to understand is that IF it didn't have "range finding", it was what is known in the industry as mere "DF"this is waht the German "fellow" had ie direction finding-this is NOT radar-do you follow??-can you get it into that tiny little cranium that sits so tightly up your rather larger rectum??

    It cannot BE radar if it has no range finding-I know how complex this must be for you.....(yawn!!)

  • @fokjock, Note I capitalize 'RADAR' & don't capitalize 'radar', because 'radar' is easier & shorter to write than 'the original device that first detected objects from afar by using radio waves' or whatever. You are a moron.

  • @christof139

    Now fudpucker, you capitalise than you "don't" capitalise-hmmm-that makes a lot of sense, just like you always do!!?? har har!!-Pretty obvious you haven't a clue what you're talking about and your restricted IQ restricts you to wiki stories that don't describe fhe full subject area of all the topics you have chosen to debate whether it be jet engines, radar whatever.A bigger fool and simplistic tool would be difficult to find.

  • @fokjock, You also stated that Britain permanently lost land to the USA due to its inclusion of land as part of its Lend Lease payments. Answer my question - that you didn't answer before when I asked - what land was lost permanently to the USA? The lands that Britan lost after WWII were former colonies etc. that gained their independence from the colonial power of Britain.

  • @christof139

    The US bourgeoisie set out to reduce the British nation state to a secondary economic and military power. The main objective was to demolish the British Empire which you regarded as the main obstacle to American expansionism. By developing the appropriate policies and using its enormous economic and political power, it achieved this goal in the course of the war and the reconstruction which followed. Your arguments that it cost Britain"nothing" are outright lies and ignorance.

  • @fokjock, Ha ha ha!! You are a joke!! And a complete lunatic!! Seems the Brits were the ones that were out to turn the USA & every other nation into a colony & secondary power. You are an insane hypocritical loon-tune.

    I use 'radar' as explained. RADAR is the acronym. You are a moron.