@WedgieMajor Sorry, but he's our next PM. He has the views and concerns of a majority of Australians at heart. The nation is just old, and conservative enough, to know he is the right man.
Shut up, Fraser. It's a wonder you were even a member of the Liberal Party, let alone PM. This idiot left the Liberal Party because it was too "Right Wing" for him. Ah! It's Australia's equivalent of a conservative party. Duh! WTF does this guy take?
What a stupid old has-been fool. He was a complete and utter failure as a PM and now he's an expert on everything. Why doesn't he just pull his head in and fade into oblivion where he belongs... I for one don't give a damn what this fool thinks...
@666plb How about we send all morons like your to go become farmers in Afghanistan? It's all your intellect deserves. Stop ruining this country with your stupidity
People give a shit because it's the truth. He doesn't call Abbott a 'dickhead', or anything derogatory like that, he merely mentions what Abbott did, and then expresses his opinion on a man like that being in charge of our wonderful country.
Politics is all about opinions, if you can't handle someone else's opinion when expressed eloquently, and backed up with examples, I don't think you should feel so free at expressing your own opinion, especially when expressed with such aggression.
Who gives a shit what this self righteous, elitist, withered up has been thinks about anything? go back to your nursing home & pontificate at the bingo table fraser.
@midcitygym He's done far more for Australia than you could ever hope to do. He knows more about politics than you could ever hope to know. He laid out an argument, you insulted him because you have nothing else to offer other than rage and blind support. Get a clue please.
@splendidmate fraser always was an elitist champagne socialist as I suspect you are, if you want to be an apologist for someone dont waste your time on this old turd, btw i have a double degree in arts law, you?
@midcitygym wow, more insults and now an argument from authority. Two logical fallacies in one post, well done.
I am university educated yes, however i don't see what that has to do with an argument, it's either a good or bad argument regardless of who the person is who makes it. Did you enjoy getting Hecs while you were at uni? If you did then you don't completely hate socialism.
The man has got massive ticker, no doubt, and I'm a Keating loyalist to my bones. It comes from the heart, no doubt, forget the past - I indeed have; Fraser is now one of my heros.
Malcolm Fraser is a Soviet Mole. He publicly supported "the African National Congress' armed struggle for liberation".
The same ANC that used to put burning tyres around the necks of those that didn't tow their Party line.
The basic thing here though, is that the pro-New World Order Tax people can't debate the issues, but can only resort to character-assasssination of their opponents (what barristers mostly do).
Carbon Tax is a paid licence to pollute, the price to be set by the StockMarket!
@carlosantuckwell So you're saying Fraser's support of the ANC is a bad thing. Does this mean that if you were in his shoes, you would have done your very best to ensure that Nelson Madela never got into power, and that only white people would ever be able to vote in South Africa? Because that's how it's coming across to me.
The tyre story sounds like old anti-black propoganda to me too, which there was plenty of in South Africa at the time, so I call bullshit unless you can show some proof.
@Sahanavic For anyone around then - following all the news items (I was watching mainly the ABC then) - no one was disuputing the facts of ANC "necklaces" (burning tyres) being put round poor Blacks labelled (rightly or wrongly) as "traitors" - fascist tactics, but of course the Stalinists began those tactics first (not burning tyres, but other forms of assault & torture).
Of course Apartheid was wrong, but why didn't Fraser come out in support of that South African Communist front earlier?....
@Sahanavic ...and the ANC weren't the only liberation organisation in South Africa at the time - there was AZAPO (Azanian People's Organisation) - who were more Zulu-based than Bantu-based ANC.
Also for those around then, the direct links between Moscow and the leadership of the ANC (the ones who weren't in gaol) was also on ALL the media.
The really pathetic thing was Peter Luck's uncovering of some top Soviet officials selling AK47s to Apartheid cops who then claimed Soviet arming of ANC
@carlosantuckwell And whilst ad hominem attacks are a logical fallacy in a debate, Fraser's point is that Tony Abbott appears to have no principles other than to get into power by saying whatever he needs to say, without any conviction on any issues. That is not a good attribute for a future leader to have, and Fraser would be right to voice his concern.
@Inconvenientruths Do some research you twit. 70% of Australian newspapers are owned by the right wing Murdoch owned NewsLimited. Not to mention Murdoch also owning SkyNews, while part owning Foxtel!
Fraser was NEVER in touch with common Australians .. it's weird that he is cranked out in these modern times .. as if his warped opinions counted for anything anyway. As for Abbott, he's the dumbest, most-dangerous, most unprincipled politician in Australia today. He could NEVER be trusted to be ethical & responsible & smart enough to be PM. Mind you, Gillard & her mob aren't much better.
@MetaMetaphysician yes, they rely on revenue from advertisers, who pays for that revenue you and me because we are consumers, so in effect I am paying for right wing propaganda on 2gb, not too much different from paying taxes for listening to abc
'one of the things the labor party did not do was to highlight to the extent which Tony Abbott is capable of changing his mind on important elements of policy'
I know you are a previous labor leader so completely biased, but i think you forgort about the one little comment 'there will be no carbon tax under the government i lead' hypocritical words there Malcolm
Arrgh so true, Sadly Malcolm voters can't see this. Abbotts against maternity leave then he is for it. Abbotts say climate change is crap then he believes in climate change. Abbott suggests a carbon tax then he is against a carbon tax. Abbott believe in fiscal discpline then his costings get submitted to treasury and a 11 billion out. He will say and do anything to get in power, he is not someone who is worthy of the prime minstership sadly though I think he will become pm because of the media.
@bigswano One of those two senators was supplied by Sir Joh Bjelke-Peterson. Perhaps you'd better go back and study constitutional conventions and the Dismissal again.
@Prod1Kh Joh was a Nationals Premier. Last I recall, the Nationals were part of the coalition. I know Fraser wasn't directly behind it, but he used his illegitimate majority to the full extent..
@bigswano Sir Joh was a law unto himself. He ignored the national leadership of the National Country Party and did what he wanted. Remember when he launched his "Joh for PM" campaign? It sunk Howard's attempt to beat Hawke. The senator Joh sent as a replacement for a dead ALP-er was his wife (she of the pumpkin scones). Fraser may have taken full advantage of his newfound majority, but he didn't make the majority happen. You specifically accused Fraser of breaking constitutional convention to...
... stack the senate. He did not do that. Because the convention was that state premiers nominate replacement senators. As for illegitimate, perhaps you should look into the Whitlam budgets that Fraser was blocking and his source of funding. Kerr also broke convention by taking advice from Fraser, who was not a Minister of the Crown, however, Whitlam was not telling the G-G that he could dissolve parliament through the Reserve Powers. It was all very messy.
@Prod1Kh also Kerr asked Justice Barwick for his opinion and he used that as his vindication, however Justice Barwick did not give his opinion as a member of the Judiciary but as a member of the public.
@Prod1Kh exactly, which ultimately meant that Whitlam should he have seen fit could've said to Kerr "I do not accept this document, I am still the Prime Minister".
@irishgodfatherchris But, Whitlam was not giving Kerr all of the advice he should have, because he knew part of the advice was what Kerr ended up doing. As I said, all very messy. The point is, the constitution did give Kerr the power to do what he did. So, while who said what and did what didn't follow constitutional convention, his ultimate action did follow constitutional law and constitutional convention as there was already a precedent for it in Australia. Whitlam could not legally ignore.
I was a choolboy when I looked at Time magazine's cover story, HARD RIGHT FOR THE LUCKY COUNTRY. It was Dec 12 1975. Malcolm Fraser was then supposed to represent the ultra-conservative viewpoint. Now, he is, according to Kim Beazley, on the left of Beazley himself on a great many issues. Fraser hasn't changed. But, crikey, how Australia's political spectrum has moved in that time. Malcolm Fraser is now one of my heroes, a true liberal and one of the great advocates for humane policy.
@winifredatwell Would have to agree.. for me I always thought Rudd got in because he was the most Liberal looking and sounding Labour leader that I can remember in my lifetime! but that was probably the only way to oust John Howard who was ultra far right, so much so the at former key players in the Liberal party campaigned against him, including the party leader! And I have to agree that Malcolm Fraser used tact and holds himself with dignity in this short video.
just fk off you old bag you had your time and you failed and fkd the country with your liberal immigration policy and Lebanese concession.Just fk off and go dig your grave it will be best for your and the rest of us just fk off!
@megadak123 It'd be ironic that you think you're clever by saying someone thinks they're tough on the internet. It would be, given that all they did was repeat your action, but that would only be if you had a brain. It isn't ironic, and you're neither smart nor tough, it's sad and pathetic, just like you.
@megadak123 Don't get angry at him, its not his fault that you live in a backwater suburb, have a poor education and low socioeconomic standard and that an Arab, with limited english skills, came to this country, worked tirelessly crawling through crap and dirt to raise his children to become doctors and lawyers who all now live in affluent suburbs. It's not Frazers fault at all that you are a hopeless, idle bigot with no aspirations or goals. Go listen to 2GB you fuck nut.
@Agelos317 oh, that was good. Bravo sir. The Liberal bootlickers that now hate Fraser and swear by Abbott are truly the scum of this society, and at the bottom of it's intellectual food chain. They don't understand squat, they are just scared shitless by the world.
Malcolm Fraser is a scumbag. And I voted for him. I made a mistake.
phil123711 21 hours ago
@phil123711 I am sure a lot of people in Zimbabwe would agree, excluding mugabe, fraser played a role in mugabe's rise to power.
666plb 14 hours ago
@WedgieMajor Sorry, but he's our next PM. He has the views and concerns of a majority of Australians at heart. The nation is just old, and conservative enough, to know he is the right man.
atrophyfilms2012 2 days ago
Shut up, Fraser. It's a wonder you were even a member of the Liberal Party, let alone PM. This idiot left the Liberal Party because it was too "Right Wing" for him. Ah! It's Australia's equivalent of a conservative party. Duh! WTF does this guy take?
atrophyfilms2012 2 days ago
What a stupid old has-been fool. He was a complete and utter failure as a PM and now he's an expert on everything. Why doesn't he just pull his head in and fade into oblivion where he belongs... I for one don't give a damn what this fool thinks...
diver4818 5 days ago
Spot On, Malcolm! Abbott won't win an election not while the Australia public still has a brain.
WedgieMajor 1 week ago
It should have been fraser lost at sea indtead if Holt.
666plb 1 month ago
@666plb How about we send all morons like your to go become farmers in Afghanistan? It's all your intellect deserves. Stop ruining this country with your stupidity
fluffysnakeful 5 days ago
@fluffysnakeful Is that the best you can do comrade?
666plb 14 hours ago
Fraser is a loser and a wanker, FO
breadbaker226 1 month ago
People give a shit because it's the truth. He doesn't call Abbott a 'dickhead', or anything derogatory like that, he merely mentions what Abbott did, and then expresses his opinion on a man like that being in charge of our wonderful country.
Politics is all about opinions, if you can't handle someone else's opinion when expressed eloquently, and backed up with examples, I don't think you should feel so free at expressing your own opinion, especially when expressed with such aggression.
MrFelixbarbosa 2 months ago
Who gives a shit what this self righteous, elitist, withered up has been thinks about anything? go back to your nursing home & pontificate at the bingo table fraser.
midcitygym 2 months ago
@midcitygym He's done far more for Australia than you could ever hope to do. He knows more about politics than you could ever hope to know. He laid out an argument, you insulted him because you have nothing else to offer other than rage and blind support. Get a clue please.
splendidmate 1 month ago
@splendidmate fraser always was an elitist champagne socialist as I suspect you are, if you want to be an apologist for someone dont waste your time on this old turd, btw i have a double degree in arts law, you?
midcitygym 1 month ago
@midcitygym wow, more insults and now an argument from authority. Two logical fallacies in one post, well done.
I am university educated yes, however i don't see what that has to do with an argument, it's either a good or bad argument regardless of who the person is who makes it. Did you enjoy getting Hecs while you were at uni? If you did then you don't completely hate socialism.
splendidmate 1 month ago
Fucking Mal . commo ///t .
doomyblat 2 months ago
I remember the days when I hated Malcolm. These days he doesn't seem anywhere near as bad...
pauliejay 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Today marks two years since Tony Abbott said NO to action on climate change and took the Coalition leadership from Malcolm Turnbull.
You'd be forgiven for thinking that it's Ground-Hog day as Tony Abbott's had only one thing to say since then: No, No, NO!
To celebrate this auspicious occasion we've produced "The Little Book of No!" It's full of Tony Abbott's all-time best No's Find it Online..Cheers.
Mischelle999 2 months ago
The man has got massive ticker, no doubt, and I'm a Keating loyalist to my bones. It comes from the heart, no doubt, forget the past - I indeed have; Fraser is now one of my heros.
Benjpeter001 3 months ago
@Benjpeter001 of all the potential heros in the world you pick m. fraser? lmao, thats a good one!
midcitygym 1 month ago
This is LOL material coming from Fraser.
fredflinstone1291029 3 months ago
Malcolm Fraser is a Soviet Mole. He publicly supported "the African National Congress' armed struggle for liberation".
The same ANC that used to put burning tyres around the necks of those that didn't tow their Party line.
The basic thing here though, is that the pro-New World Order Tax people can't debate the issues, but can only resort to character-assasssination of their opponents (what barristers mostly do).
Carbon Tax is a paid licence to pollute, the price to be set by the StockMarket!
carlosantuckwell 3 months ago
@carlosantuckwell So you're saying Fraser's support of the ANC is a bad thing. Does this mean that if you were in his shoes, you would have done your very best to ensure that Nelson Madela never got into power, and that only white people would ever be able to vote in South Africa? Because that's how it's coming across to me.
The tyre story sounds like old anti-black propoganda to me too, which there was plenty of in South Africa at the time, so I call bullshit unless you can show some proof.
Sahanavic 2 months ago
@Sahanavic For anyone around then - following all the news items (I was watching mainly the ABC then) - no one was disuputing the facts of ANC "necklaces" (burning tyres) being put round poor Blacks labelled (rightly or wrongly) as "traitors" - fascist tactics, but of course the Stalinists began those tactics first (not burning tyres, but other forms of assault & torture).
Of course Apartheid was wrong, but why didn't Fraser come out in support of that South African Communist front earlier?....
carlosantuckwell 2 months ago
@Sahanavic ...and the ANC weren't the only liberation organisation in South Africa at the time - there was AZAPO (Azanian People's Organisation) - who were more Zulu-based than Bantu-based ANC.
Also for those around then, the direct links between Moscow and the leadership of the ANC (the ones who weren't in gaol) was also on ALL the media.
The really pathetic thing was Peter Luck's uncovering of some top Soviet officials selling AK47s to Apartheid cops who then claimed Soviet arming of ANC
carlosantuckwell 2 months ago
@carlosantuckwell And whilst ad hominem attacks are a logical fallacy in a debate, Fraser's point is that Tony Abbott appears to have no principles other than to get into power by saying whatever he needs to say, without any conviction on any issues. That is not a good attribute for a future leader to have, and Fraser would be right to voice his concern.
Sahanavic 2 months ago
Well lets face it. Mal is a has been, cryer who has long since changed his spots and shit on the ABC!
As if the Labor/Green Parties flagship media operation is going to promote anything positive about Abbott or the right/Conservatives.
It would be like having a Conservative feature on Labor's "Australian Story" or something positive about the Conservatives on "Sunrise"!
Shit Oh Dear!
Inconvenientruths 3 months ago
@Inconvenientruths Do some research you twit. 70% of Australian newspapers are owned by the right wing Murdoch owned NewsLimited. Not to mention Murdoch also owning SkyNews, while part owning Foxtel!
Heffman07 2 months ago
Fraser is a dissapointing hasbeen
breadbaker226 3 months ago
Kerrs cur. We haven't forgotten.
napalm5 3 months ago
Fraser was NEVER in touch with common Australians .. it's weird that he is cranked out in these modern times .. as if his warped opinions counted for anything anyway. As for Abbott, he's the dumbest, most-dangerous, most unprincipled politician in Australia today. He could NEVER be trusted to be ethical & responsible & smart enough to be PM. Mind you, Gillard & her mob aren't much better.
colindominy 3 months ago
Q n A = Left wing circle jerk paid for by tax payer.
Malcolm Fraser = man who loses his pants while paying for sex in Memphis.
MetaMetaphysician 4 months ago
@MetaMetaphysician 2gb = Circle jerk for right wing nutters paid by consumers (everyone)
Mollarooza 3 months ago
@Mollarooza
A private station localised to Sydney is paid for by everyone?
You need to think then type.
MetaMetaphysician 3 months ago
@MetaMetaphysician yes, they rely on revenue from advertisers, who pays for that revenue you and me because we are consumers, so in effect I am paying for right wing propaganda on 2gb, not too much different from paying taxes for listening to abc
Mollarooza 3 months ago
nobody ever asks fraser if he regrets supporting robert mugabe
666plb 4 months ago
hmm that chick on the right is hot.
bigpoppa1234 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
'one of the things the labor party did not do was to highlight to the extent which Tony Abbott is capable of changing his mind on important elements of policy'
I know you are a previous labor leader so completely biased, but i think you forgort about the one little comment 'there will be no carbon tax under the government i lead' hypocritical words there Malcolm
MrPurplefood 4 months ago
Comment removed
MrPurplefood 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A pathetic, senile old fool. Poor Malcolm!
TheLoneStranger0 5 months ago
A pathetic, senile old fool. Poor Malcolm!
TheLoneStranger0 5 months ago
bitter nonsense from the worst Liberal party PM ever.
MrAntiFarLeft 5 months ago
@MrAntiFarLeft The worst PM ever was the one who gave Saddam Hussein $395million; your hero John Howard; the poison dwarf.
chavrecycling 5 months ago
@chavrecycling worst pm's ever
1. whitlam
2.Rudd
3.Gillard
4.Keating
5.Fraser
MrAntiFarLeft 5 months ago
@MrAntiFarLeft Tell us more about your favourite PM; the one who gave Saddam Hussein $395 million dollars.
Why are you so shy? You supported Saddam all along. He was Donald Rumsfeld's friend, and Little Johnny arse licker's friend, and your friend.
You worship John Howard for supporting Saddam, just as you think Nick Griffin's a hero for supporting Gaddafi.
Tell us more, you filthy far right traitor.
chavrecycling 5 months ago
@MrAntiFarLeft hmm... perhaps a skinhead would be more your type as a leader? just saying.
Atheeizm 4 months ago
@MrAntiFarLeft I'm kind of shocked a conservative thinks Rudd was worse than Gillard.
DMAN123223 3 months ago
Malcom fraser you fool what do you think Gillard did to get into power
She sold her soul to the Greens
lmadigan1971 5 months ago
tony abbott=DOGSHIT
poopy50832 5 months ago
@poopy50832 how come your comment and name are all about waste products
lmadigan1971 5 months ago
Malcolm Fraser deserves the utmost respect for speaking his mind on the current Liberal Party.
Artspeakcentral 6 months ago
Arrgh so true, Sadly Malcolm voters can't see this. Abbotts against maternity leave then he is for it. Abbotts say climate change is crap then he believes in climate change. Abbott suggests a carbon tax then he is against a carbon tax. Abbott believe in fiscal discpline then his costings get submitted to treasury and a 11 billion out. He will say and do anything to get in power, he is not someone who is worthy of the prime minstership sadly though I think he will become pm because of the media.
dcc1980 6 months ago
Malcolm WHO?
crocodile2006 6 months ago
anything to get into power?
like breaking constitutional convention to stack the senate in your favour and then use it to block supply forcing the dismissal?
bigswano 6 months ago
@bigswano One of those two senators was supplied by Sir Joh Bjelke-Peterson. Perhaps you'd better go back and study constitutional conventions and the Dismissal again.
Prod1Kh 6 months ago
@Prod1Kh Joh was a Nationals Premier. Last I recall, the Nationals were part of the coalition. I know Fraser wasn't directly behind it, but he used his illegitimate majority to the full extent..
bigswano 6 months ago
@bigswano Sir Joh was a law unto himself. He ignored the national leadership of the National Country Party and did what he wanted. Remember when he launched his "Joh for PM" campaign? It sunk Howard's attempt to beat Hawke. The senator Joh sent as a replacement for a dead ALP-er was his wife (she of the pumpkin scones). Fraser may have taken full advantage of his newfound majority, but he didn't make the majority happen. You specifically accused Fraser of breaking constitutional convention to...
Prod1Kh 6 months ago
... stack the senate. He did not do that. Because the convention was that state premiers nominate replacement senators. As for illegitimate, perhaps you should look into the Whitlam budgets that Fraser was blocking and his source of funding. Kerr also broke convention by taking advice from Fraser, who was not a Minister of the Crown, however, Whitlam was not telling the G-G that he could dissolve parliament through the Reserve Powers. It was all very messy.
Prod1Kh 6 months ago
@Prod1Kh also Kerr asked Justice Barwick for his opinion and he used that as his vindication, however Justice Barwick did not give his opinion as a member of the Judiciary but as a member of the public.
irishgodfatherchris 5 months ago
@irishgodfatherchris Which was not a constitutional convention.
Prod1Kh 5 months ago
@Prod1Kh exactly, which ultimately meant that Whitlam should he have seen fit could've said to Kerr "I do not accept this document, I am still the Prime Minister".
irishgodfatherchris 5 months ago
@irishgodfatherchris But, Whitlam was not giving Kerr all of the advice he should have, because he knew part of the advice was what Kerr ended up doing. As I said, all very messy. The point is, the constitution did give Kerr the power to do what he did. So, while who said what and did what didn't follow constitutional convention, his ultimate action did follow constitutional law and constitutional convention as there was already a precedent for it in Australia. Whitlam could not legally ignore.
Prod1Kh 5 months ago
Malcolm Fraser? who is HE to comment on CHARACTER? hahahahaha
and i suppose he think Rudd and Gillard wouldn't do anything to stay in power?
oh please.....................
Soundgarden8497 7 months ago
I was a choolboy when I looked at Time magazine's cover story, HARD RIGHT FOR THE LUCKY COUNTRY. It was Dec 12 1975. Malcolm Fraser was then supposed to represent the ultra-conservative viewpoint. Now, he is, according to Kim Beazley, on the left of Beazley himself on a great many issues. Fraser hasn't changed. But, crikey, how Australia's political spectrum has moved in that time. Malcolm Fraser is now one of my heroes, a true liberal and one of the great advocates for humane policy.
winifredatwell 10 months ago 32
@winifredatwell So true, and so unfortunate...
ummjw 9 months ago
@winifredatwell ugly things have happened.
liberalcynic 8 months ago
@winifredatwell so you would then consider yourself ultra conservative if it was 1975?
ex0ja 3 months ago
@ex0ja What an odd question.
mlawren7 3 months ago
@winifredatwell Well said but also a little scary!
fishardansin 2 months ago
@winifredatwell You are totally correct.
fluffysnakeful 5 days ago
@winifredatwell Would have to agree.. for me I always thought Rudd got in because he was the most Liberal looking and sounding Labour leader that I can remember in my lifetime! but that was probably the only way to oust John Howard who was ultra far right, so much so the at former key players in the Liberal party campaigned against him, including the party leader! And I have to agree that Malcolm Fraser used tact and holds himself with dignity in this short video.
Snakelady99 1 day ago
just fk off you old bag you had your time and you failed and fkd the country with your liberal immigration policy and Lebanese concession.Just fk off and go dig your grave it will be best for your and the rest of us just fk off!
megadak123 1 year ago
@megadak123 don't tell him to fk off, you FUCK off!
MatthewFord93 1 year ago
@MatthewFord93 oh im so scared your really tough you know
megadak123 1 year ago
@megadak123 It'd be ironic that you think you're clever by saying someone thinks they're tough on the internet. It would be, given that all they did was repeat your action, but that would only be if you had a brain. It isn't ironic, and you're neither smart nor tough, it's sad and pathetic, just like you.
Prod1Kh 6 months ago
@megadak123 Don't get angry at him, its not his fault that you live in a backwater suburb, have a poor education and low socioeconomic standard and that an Arab, with limited english skills, came to this country, worked tirelessly crawling through crap and dirt to raise his children to become doctors and lawyers who all now live in affluent suburbs. It's not Frazers fault at all that you are a hopeless, idle bigot with no aspirations or goals. Go listen to 2GB you fuck nut.
Agelos317 11 months ago 55
@Agelos317 Arabs crawling through crap and Im sure your one of them dont worry I do listen to 2GB cocksucker
megadak123 11 months ago
@megadak123 'I do listen to 2GB cocksucker'.
Of course you do.
TheSwearingBear 8 months ago 4
@Agelos317 well said, old chap.
maroonoasis 7 months ago
@Agelos317 Beautiful.
Atheeizm 4 months ago
@Agelos317 oh, that was good. Bravo sir. The Liberal bootlickers that now hate Fraser and swear by Abbott are truly the scum of this society, and at the bottom of it's intellectual food chain. They don't understand squat, they are just scared shitless by the world.
fluffysnakeful 5 days ago