UFO - NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE - NEVADA TEST SITE

[dunkleish]

Anyone of my science friends have a calculation of the dive between 0:38-0:40?

[junkiron1]

Amazing object? I'm more impressed with the amazing camera if the range data is correct. The focus speeds are incredible! Makes me doubt the validity of the data displays.

Where is the Air Force verification report? Who authenticated the film?

[cr0uchingtiger]

I think the camera is moving rather than the object.

[Vyylandra]

@cr0uchingtiger Not its not. Its the object, whatever it is.

[CremeF]

Must be swamp gas

[jStevieO]

told ya !

[Huttate1]

Looks like an early vtol UAV test.

[JOEYJORDISONSMAGOT]

yes the Nellis AFB is by vegas as my dad worked there and we lived there and ive been on the base before

[godparticles1]

Now look you asshole black Governments

I need to get to Thailand from UK in two seconds OK not 12 bloody hours in a tin firework

I dont care if its Government tech or alien tech or Demon tech

[dakdakdak]

its a MANMADE vertical-take off uav duhhh... the predator drones are based out of nellis air force base...

[ironmancwb]

Its NOT fake and is shown at the 2010 disclosure Meeting back in May ht tp://ww w.youtube.com/watch?v=RY9URJKv­JZg&NR=1  watch at 1:50 into the video , and hear this guy talk

[StellarBlue1]

Oh come on! This is some of the weirdest shit yet. I have been an avid UFO hunter for over 30 years, and this video shook me. Even if the damn thing is fake, it still is an amazing bit of photography.

[Theneongray2]

The way it is moving, kind of slowly spinning and floating at different speeds makes me believe this could be four weather balloons connected together, and any odd movements are from the hills/mountains wind currents.

I can't believe this video quality was considered "high tech" back in 1995. The video is horrible, even 8mm film from 1940 looks MUCH better than this. You do have to consider that adding lots of distortion to a video of some balloons would fool a lot of peoples imaginations.

[fwaztastic]

Um, sorry but my posts are in reverse order. Read 'em oldest to newest. I'm a genius, you know! :P

[fwaztastic]

As far as the viscerally creepy shape-shifting goes -- I ain't touchin' that! That by itself, regardless of whether the rangefinder stuff is accurate or not, makes this one of the best and most thought provoking clips out there, and one I've mulled over since it first aired on TV 15 years ago.

FYI I am a skeptic (but not a cynic.) Clearly there's something here. What, I don't know.

[fwaztastic]

Range data could be coming from a radar station that is not near the camera, painting the object from a different angle. Ie: the radar location is feeding range data zeroed for a certain spot on the base, and not zeroed on the camera.

Or the rangefinder isn't getting accurate data for unknown reasons, and is feeding the camera inaccurate numbers. Maybe easier to swallow that than some weird shape-shifting thing moving at celestial speeds near ground level.



[fwaztastic]

One anomaly I see here is that the object does not seem to recede from the camera in a way corresponding to the inferred distance and the jump speed. And there is no corresponding zoom-in on the semi-cloudy background. Ditto the last jump. There is a marked increase in camera angle as the object apparently moves closer to it and higher in the sky relative to it, and the object does appear larger here, but not as much so as you would expect if it had suddenly moved 13 miles closer to the camera.

[fwaztastic]

The rangefinder data here is truly weird. At around starting around 0:32, the rangefinder jumps from about 7,480 meters to 12,470 meters -- a nearly 3 mile jump in just a couple of seconds. Later at about 0:57 the range jumps about 11 miles -- again in about 2 seconds. Then again at about 1:10 from roughly 32,000 meters to 9,000 meters -- a 13 mile leap -- in less than 2 seconds. Jump #3, 13 miles, oh, say 120,000 MPH or so. Remarkable IF the rangefinder is correct.

[fwaztastic]

Re: camera shakiness: The story goes this was allegedly shot by a radar guided camera on the ground, part of the base's automated air-defenses. Cameras like that constantly adjust angle and zoom to input from the radar, which tracks objects in real time. The radar was probably having trouble locking onto the object, which is why the film appears shaky. Not surprising given the maneuvers inferred by the rangefinder (upper right corner in meters distant from radar.)

[WatchingViking]

this tech exists and we are not allowed to have it. sad sad sad.

[philby74]

this is radar. wow

[miketite]

I once watched this footage with the audio, and I can tell you the conversation between the man in the field and the woman on the radio is really more interesting than the video itself. At one point the guy gets so excited the girl has to tell him to "calm down", then he asks her "its ours aint it?", and she replies "yes". So I guess not every saucer has little green men in them -some are carrying douchebags as well.

[RonScheel1]

I lived litteraly 30 yards from the nellis air force base when we were growing onions out there for 3 months. Saw a lot of stuff that was pretty crazy

[XCrazyGuitarManX]

this looks faked once it's in close it just goes nuts and doesn't look real, it could also be like some kinda hover-craft thing the government were testing and alot closer than it look, or some bloke with a toy on a stick lol

[crazylongboarder]

@XCrazyGuitarManX actually distortion caused by the craft's (gravity) field makes the shots often 'flutter' or appear to be underwater. It's pretty common in all kinds of ufo footage now that I think of it..

[XCrazyGuitarManX]

@crazylongboarder don't get me wrong, i'd love to believe that was a craft with individuals of another intelligent species inside. But some random guy on you tube saying 'it has a gravity field' isn't going to make me believe it. chances are there's no scientific reason for their ship to have one anyways, just some rubbish made up by nerds. give me a scientific explanation for why it's there if you can i'm not saying this isn't real just that it's not 100% definite same as all UFO vids.

[971QKE]

Ok, I really can't say what this object is, but based upon the data on the screen (...and provided it's not faked, and I can see where it easily could be) the object does move away from the camera at incredible speed. There are approximately 1610 meters in one mile, and at around 0:56 the RNG (Range) in the to right corner moves from 14,000+ and to 27,000+ and then to 31,000+ almost instantaneously.

Interesting.

[inagod]

it looks like the lunar module,but that was designed to operate in the low gravity,vacuum of space and is incapable of flying around on earth.

[inagod]

what is the dark area,a gravity shield,is it able to amp up gravity,using it as a control or is this a fake and I'm looking to deep?somebody's not talking

[Telstar2Nite]

Well, if they can actually confirm that it traveled 12 miles in one second, that is definitely not human technology (nor would any human be able to stand that G force). I must say its movement is similar to the pointer movement by a computer mouse. Just imagine, if we could "virtualize" the universe, we could travel between points with the click of a mouse!

[mulder3035]

Incredible footage - Which proves a very small percantage of sightings cannot be explained.

To people saying this poor video quallity,this is because its GROUND RADAR footage.

This is the best evidence about anywhere (air force experts have confirmed the footage is genuine- all readings on the screen match up etc).

I wish someone could tell us what the heck this is - It changes shape,does impossible manouvers and seems to defy all laws of physics -And its not a hoax.

Incredible !

[renekenshin6573]

This is the real thing, they were still unable to explain this. The space craft is observing the B2 bomber testing

[inagod]

as a side note,there was weapons testing [nuclear] about 6 miles from here,so maybe ?

[heywood1980]

were they riding on a train while recording this?

[SunnyGOES]

1995 huh? lets grab our blurriest camera with no color! Way to go air force base -_-

[kaidzzUUUU]

He said I got a EVIL!

[inagod]

@kaidzzUUUU I got a Helo is what was said

[KitKat5781]

aliens sure are shitty drivers.

[zzzthaoster]

it's balloon of some type haha...no ufo is that lame.

[enforce007]

as if a balloon would be that fast .... ofc mate ^^

[Theneongray2]

@enforce007

So you just kind of assume the data is correct?

In the video it sure doesn't look like it is changing altitude by eleven miles in a few seconds... There is no blur or size difference.

When the space shuttle is 11 miles up NASA needs two completely different kind of cameras to film it, and even then the higher altitude footage with tracking software is shaky.

[StellarBlue1]

@Theneongray2 I agree with you about the 11 miles distance in a few seconds bit.  There was no proof of the 11 mile change, but there are certainly other aspects that are very interesting.

[Telstar2Nite]

This UFO, or whatever it is, seems to be traveling pretty stable (with the ground still in sight). It's not until after the ground is out of site that it starts moving erratically. In my opinion, I think it is whoever holding the camera that is making all the sudden movements. Why isn't the object moving erratically during the first minute of the video (when the ground is in sight)? Yeah, it's a plastic shopping bag from Wal-Mart! (I hope, I hope they've not come here to eat us!)

[fadethetrade]

because reports stated it was mocking the pilots keeping a perfect distance from the approaching airplane.The device was flying backwards to avoid the incoming plane at just the precise foot!!And it started displaying the antigravity maneuvers.I believe this was ours and we were conducting a test on these pilots to see how they would react.

[inagod]

@fadethetrade this is a ground radar tracking trailer,taking the video,radar data.

[mulder3035]

@Telstar2Nite This is what i thought as well (shacky camera).But experts who can read the reading on the screen (not UFO weirdos) confirm that its the object on screen making these manouvers,infact the object travels 12 miles in 1 second at one point (according to the display readings) ..I'm 100% sceptic to all things "UFO",but i'd love someone to tell us what this is ......It even changes shape at one point - The best "evidence" ive ever seen of a UFO.

Simply because "sceptics" me,are baffled.

[lakemead00]

It is a plastic shopping bag from Von's.

[SPARTAN137ODST]

*Cough* Nellis is in Ohio *Cough*

[buangjerryl167]

wow dumb ass nellis in near las vegas....

I know this cuz' I live there...lol

[OperaApparition]

agreed, Nellis is by las vegas, as i used to live there as well.

[jamesff77]

I did disagree, but i searched on google earth, Nellis AFB,- NEVADA!

[EimantazzzWM]

sure you do, sure :)

[Axeldude]

weeeeeeeee

[skatingandbroken]

logicskier you´re so right

[GRIDKEEPER]

Interesting video, check out my latest video to see images of soon to be released new footage, it is incredible!

[inagod]

@GRIDKEEPER ,no thanks,

[logicskier]

TalmudTruthSeeker, you are an asshole.

[TalmudTruthSeeker]

why is the quality always so shitty on these ufo films, just like the evidence on the holocau$t.

[inagod]

@TalmudTruthSeeker how about we engrave Jew into your forehead and send you back in time,see what its like to have your children and family gassed in front of you,knowing your next.come on take a chance on my time machine,if the holocaust didn't happen,you should be fine.