If you want to see real PS4/XBOX 720 graphics, then search "Fast Global Illumination Baking via Ray-Bundles" on youtube. It's the Luminous Engine that Square Enix is working on.
The uploader (traktamente) has more videos on the Luminous Engine on his channel. Go see them!
I hope CryTek will make the next game for PC only... The original Crysis could look better then Crysis 2 with mods, but the only bad thing about it is the DirectX 9.
@wemakepies agree, mather nature FTW -- but not all scenes are readily available on your desktop so people need some simulated/imagined graphs to get content
The best game for this engine is coming out this spring, it's Halo galaxy of Combat. It's a fan made game, but all the current trailers for it are in the pre alpha stage'
My lord... this is.... scary to think people can make games like this.... isn't this engine available to public for free or something? Or was that Cry Engine 2/1?
@CommunistHater666 Frosbite is a shame to Cryengine, What they should really make to exploit the full capability of Cryengine 3 is to make a PC exclusive game.
@Iboshido No, Cryengine use to have realtime physics simulation using the physx from nvidia, much above shity scripted animated destructions of frostbite 2.
@Iboshido CryENGINE 3 already has the power of destruction. FB2 uses mostly scripted destruction anyway, so it's possible in CE3. It's just CryTEK never really showed use, or attempted to show the possibility of destruction. But, it's totally possible. Even in CE2, it was possible but CryTEK didn't try to implement a system into Crysis 1.
I hate it when people judge the game engine by the GAME. :)
Judge how the engine works, the development side, efficiency, how it handles assets, terrain, render times (if it has render times), what programs it supports (COMPATIBILITY, VERY important to some people.), how it handle's the graphics, models, and lighting, 'multi-platform tools', '3-D support'.
@PhysicsTowerTeam what do you mean by scripted like the destruction has to happen to a structure at a certain time and the player has no say? If so fb2 is not scripted destruction in bf3 from what i kno of so far (ok maybe at certain points in campaign) because you can destroy most structures at will. i dont know if need for speed the run and command and conquer generals 2 has scripted destruction but im 100% sure bf3 has at will destruction (of course because i have it)
@Voldermort365 No no no. Scripted means it's not calculated in real time. When you destroy a building, the CPU/GPU doesn't calculate where parts would travel. It's all pre-calculated. (When player causes X amount of damage, house pieces go this way, follow exactly this path, exactly at this speed). In real time, the physics are calculated according to it's environment (such as where the damage is hit, how it would fall, etc.).
@Voldermort365 So, no matter how you hit it, it would always fall according to one or a few scripted events. This also allows for better performance (since all the computer has to do is move pieces from one place to another and add particles).
It may look better (since it's scripted, and they have programs/computers dedicated to make those look as real and good as possible), but having it in real time is slightly more impressive and realistic.
@PhysicsTowerTeam The devs obviously did what they wanted to with their engine. They chose to limit the engine, so you can't judge it as what it COULD'VE been. Judge it for what it is, which is the game ¬¬
@SuperFunnyman001 Yes, for the GAME.You know their are people who are dedicated, and work on the engines themselves for a living (CE2 and CE3). They create work that looks graphically better as well. When you create 'art', you don't have to worry about game play or performance issues. Trust me there is a difference :)
@PhysicsTowerTeam Whats your point? Unless you're just an idiot trying to start an argument over something when you obviously don't understand the difference between a game and it's engine.
@SuperFunnyman001 I'm just trying to say it doesn't really matter what the engine is. They are all basically the same. It comes down to the developer to decide what to do with it. If they are aiming for graphics/art, simulation, game play, etc.
What they do is obviously limited to the developer abilities. The Engine is just there to help, and the each engine provides features functions that may help the developer in certain ways, thus them choosing the engine that benefits them most. :)
@PhysicsTowerTeam What has that got to do with anything? You said first you hate it when people judge engines by the games running that engine, which makes no sense as an engine which supports some basic level of destruction (like CryEngine 2 and 3) wouldn't need that feature for a game like Crysis, which is just run and gun with a little strategy needed for dumb AI.
@SuperFunnyman001 I'm sure I understand you clearly. An engine is a 3-D tool, to create things like games and simulation. They are all basically the same. What differs between them is the features and functions they offer. (i.e. CE3 has Sandbox and Flowgraphs, but a horrible asset pipeline system, while Source has an excellent asset pipeline system, is matured, by outdated).
@SuperFunnyman001 People are biased when understanding the engine. They think if a game running the engine has destruction/good graphics, they will usually relate destruction/good graphics to the engine, and think the engine dominates in that area.
In reality, all engines are the same. It depends on the developer on what they do with the engine. If they want to create destruction, dynamic water, or anything else, it can be done with any engine, even if it's natively supported or not.
@SuperFunnyman001 Developers never choose engines by graphics, it's games, etc. They choose them by the tools offered by the engine to help create what ever they want (such as games). Each engine is different in this area, and depending on how and what they want to make, it differs.
An engine should really be judged from the development side, where things really matter.
@PhysicsTowerTeam I don't know why you'll telling me this, cause I know it >.< But devs choose engines by the gameplay mechanics available to the engine, which is why SDKs like UDK and Source are becomming more and more popular.
If anything can be rendered in any engine, are you telling me someone could create Far Cry 3 visuals on the old Doom engine? No.
@SuperFunnyman001 Game play mechanics are also based on the developer. They can code them. You don't need a specific engine. Again, this is based on the developer.
Doom Engine: It isn't technically a 3-D engine. But if someone could be nifty, they could create Far Cry 3 Environments, if they modify the code and put in high res textures. Also, graphics shouldn't be a priority--development and costs are.
Also, I mean't "I don't think I understand you clearly". I forgot to put that in.
@Iboshido ps the endines doen't make the graphics.. they make the models you make look better because of physics and different things. It makes the models seem real. You can make UDK look good too.. but it doesn't feel the same as Cry or Frostbite
@Iboshido Combine Cryengine 3's graphics, Source's physics, Frostbite's destruction and The powder toy's Chemistry, what do you get? life. in videogame mode.
@Iboshido You dont have to be CoD fanboy to realize that frostbite 2 is rubbish. Ye its awesome but its brand new and got tons of bugs in, so I actually prefer to play CoD with stupid but stable engine insted BF3 with cool but bugged engine. Its fucking up the game.
stop complaining about bad graphics for pc...you have your sandbox editor and make your own maps and use all the potentials of cryengine...don't mind other trolls.. IMO Cryengine 3 has the best SSAO and best render engine there is. credits go to Vladimir Kajalin and crytek developers
It's quite scary. When you look at real life it looks werid but when looking at game like Cyrsis you look at something much more detailed and better. While still using your eyes. .. 0_0.. kinda of weird.
a friend of mine burned out his xbox on C2. not impressed. i burned out a $2500 custom built monster of a computer on crysis(1). im (very) upset, yet still impressed that the '07 game has better... well, everything. but this. hell ill need rehab because i will get confused on what is reality....
Beautiful as this is, I can't get excited until I hear about a really great immersive game that's going to use it. I'd love to play a plot-driven RPG with this much eye candy, not a mindless shooter.
Crysis 2 makes the engine look like a waste, and runs like shit on consoles.. Crysis is still one of the most beautiful games I've ever seen, Frostbite 2 destruction side kinda sucks, the lightning of the engine is superb though.
Crytek, why did you make consoles the lead platform? We could have gotten an overall better game, since you insist that the engine has real-time multiplatform editing. But no, you put all of your resources to make console quality textures and levels. Sorry, but your "High-Res" texture pack sucks. I like MaLDo's HD Mod better, since it is a true high-resolution texture pack.
@Prullenbak9 i would have to say 3 best engines as UDK is such a user freindly platform! its so easy to create stunning enviroments and you can download from their website without even an account!
@valmanzar16 Ah I see! :P Well its a concept that sells a lot, maybe that's why... Maybe its the reason gamers want simple goals, ie kill all the bad guys, but yeah its a shame we don't have more variety in video games, lets hope it will get better tho. :)
i find ti difficult that any1 would have the nerves to put these ppl down, and they gave us the cry engine 2 for free, there is no flippen reason any1 should be complaining.
@Hiddenus1 i meant working a part time job so at least you can buy a new rig sooner :D and i care cuz i've cried for a new computer for 5 years untill i bought mine with my own money ^^
CryEngine Nailed us pretty hard. They say there would be an sandbox on Ps3 and XBOX, but once the day i got it i wasnt so excited anymore because alot of what they sed like destroyable environment wasnt true, The multiplayer sucked also. but The story was very VERY nice!
Too bad most of this footage wasnt added into the game, i heard before the game was released that [1:06] alleyway in that china town would be in the game.
I might leave Unity for CryEngine..... Only thing is the asset pipeline Unit has to offer.... Especially Blender support
Mellojello5123 14 hours ago
Minecraft has the best graphics!
clubbythe 1 day ago
i can see now why crysis has so amazing graphics
lifeislifesolive 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you want to see real PS4/XBOX 720 graphics, then search "Fast Global Illumination Baking via Ray-Bundles" on youtube. It's the Luminous Engine that Square Enix is working on.
The uploader (traktamente) has more videos on the Luminous Engine on his channel. Go see them!
podtech115 1 week ago
WW2 FPS "Enemy front" will run on CE3.
Ps3GamerVideos 2 weeks ago
Could anyone please tell me wich games have this engine or wich of the upcoming games are going to have it ???
wantedwanted21 2 weeks ago
I don't mind the comparison of CryEngine and Frostbite. It's just that I like Crysis and Battlefield. :)
hirokishinguji 2 weeks ago
lol none of this was actualy put into Crysis 2.
strader1234 2 weeks ago
it could have been so mutch better if it wasnt console ported
nukeclears 2 weeks ago
integrated voxels =awesome :D
Theremanppdas 3 weeks ago
GRAFON
fadaf9999 3 weeks ago
I can't wait for the next Game to come out for 360 that uses this Engine that Isn't Crysis 2!!!
ReFleXFnatic 3 weeks ago
Dear notch, could you use this...
julienmauricemort 3 weeks ago
Did you know that GTA V will run on CryEngine 3?
algirdas181218 3 weeks ago
@algirdas181218 lol it wont, it will be the euphoria engine, didnt you see the traler ??
nfsmohpsp 3 weeks ago
@algirdas181218 What a lie. Only about 20 companies so far have permission to publish a game made in CryENGINE 3, and Rockstar is not one of them.
Catalytera 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@algirdas181218 What a lie. Only about 20 so far have permission to publish a game made in CryENGINE 3, and Rockstar is not one of them.
Catalytera 3 weeks ago
I hope CryTek will make the next game for PC only... The original Crysis could look better then Crysis 2 with mods, but the only bad thing about it is the DirectX 9.
EaSiD03 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
100% realt time go fuck yourselves this game has hanged about 100 times on my ps3
DghOstKnight 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
DghOstKnight 3 weeks ago
How are computers getting better graphics cards than the EARTH?
wemakepies 3 weeks ago 7
@wemakepies agree, mather nature FTW -- but not all scenes are readily available on your desktop so people need some simulated/imagined graphs to get content
segaboy1983 3 weeks ago
@wemakepies They aren't getting more realistic graphics cards than the earth. They are simply better looking.
Cheezywheel 15 hours ago
skyrim + cry engine 3 = epic win + never leave the house!
burziq100 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
burziq100 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
eightypuff01 4 weeks ago
@eightypuff01 crysis 2 is with cry engine 3 idiot
burziq100 3 weeks ago
@burziq100 yes I am..-_-
eightypuff01 3 weeks ago
Good god, stop showing me 360 and PS3 renderings, I WANT TO SEE THE MAXIMUM PC GRADE RENDERS
Razer1103 4 weeks ago
I have Crysis 2, Battlefield 3 and Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare 3. LIFE IS AWESOME!
67Zaka 1 month ago
The best game for this engine is coming out this spring, it's Halo galaxy of Combat. It's a fan made game, but all the current trailers for it are in the pre alpha stage'
explorehalouniverse 1 month ago
city-interactive are making a game with fully destructible maps
city-interactive(dot)com
nordimafia 1 month ago
if bf3 had this engine it would be awesome :)
5000mahmud 1 month ago
O_O
My lord... this is.... scary to think people can make games like this.... isn't this engine available to public for free or something? Or was that Cry Engine 2/1?
SUICIDALthe1ST 1 month ago
@SUICIDALthe1ST Yes, the engine has a free version. Just Google it.
BigdogWitBigdog 1 month ago
How much does it cost to get a version of cryengine3 ( for myself)
SuperErogon 1 month ago
@SuperErogon they have a free sdk non developer version for download and use here mycryengine(dot)com
LINK1733 1 month ago
@LINK1733 just replace the (dot) with an actual .
LINK1733 1 month ago
I used to play Cryengine3, then my computer exploded.
FishizleGames 1 month ago
wait you can get this shit on concoles?
DanteFearless666 1 month ago
@DanteFearless666 this is what most people think the PS4 will come with.
gis9point8mpssquared 1 month ago
sweet baby jesus with a flamethrower.......
DerpyCatfish 1 month ago
i bet my life half of interactivity scenes are scripted
Gunzotus 1 month ago
frostbite 2 = cryegine 2
now stop trollin
tonypotterz 1 month ago
what EA needs to do is get Crytek and Dice to make a game together combining Cryengine and Frostbite
CommunistHater666 1 month ago
@CommunistHater666 fuck dice and there engine, its all bout CE 3
BRBSHUTUPNOOB 1 month ago
@CommunistHater666 Frosbite is a shame to Cryengine, What they should really make to exploit the full capability of Cryengine 3 is to make a PC exclusive game.
drakenlorde 1 month ago
@drakenlorde The problem with PC exclusive games are piracy.
CommunistHater666 1 month ago
@CommunistHater666 Not really. Crysis was only PC and they made a LOT of money. Plus, the most illegaly downloaded games are multiplatform games.
drakenlorde 1 month ago
There should be a Engine with the grafic of CryEngine 3 and the destrutction of Frostbite 2... EPIC!!
Iboshido 1 month ago 47
@Iboshido No, Cryengine use to have realtime physics simulation using the physx from nvidia, much above shity scripted animated destructions of frostbite 2.
drakenlorde 1 month ago
@Iboshido CryENGINE 3 already has the power of destruction. FB2 uses mostly scripted destruction anyway, so it's possible in CE3. It's just CryTEK never really showed use, or attempted to show the possibility of destruction. But, it's totally possible. Even in CE2, it was possible but CryTEK didn't try to implement a system into Crysis 1.
I hate it when people judge the game engine by the GAME. :)
PhysicsTowerTeam 1 month ago 26
@PhysicsTowerTeam By what exactly should we judge the engine ? By tech demos?
lasjd11 1 month ago
@lasjd11 By what an engine actually is. A tool.
Judge how the engine works, the development side, efficiency, how it handles assets, terrain, render times (if it has render times), what programs it supports (COMPATIBILITY, VERY important to some people.), how it handle's the graphics, models, and lighting, 'multi-platform tools', '3-D support'.
(CE3 strengths: Flowgraphs, Realtime, WYSIWYG, etc.)
To judge graphics, go look at work by someone who is aiming for graphics, (Artists).
:)
PhysicsTowerTeam 1 month ago
@PhysicsTowerTeam what do you mean by scripted like the destruction has to happen to a structure at a certain time and the player has no say? If so fb2 is not scripted destruction in bf3 from what i kno of so far (ok maybe at certain points in campaign) because you can destroy most structures at will. i dont know if need for speed the run and command and conquer generals 2 has scripted destruction but im 100% sure bf3 has at will destruction (of course because i have it)
Voldermort365 3 weeks ago
@Voldermort365 No no no. Scripted means it's not calculated in real time. When you destroy a building, the CPU/GPU doesn't calculate where parts would travel. It's all pre-calculated. (When player causes X amount of damage, house pieces go this way, follow exactly this path, exactly at this speed). In real time, the physics are calculated according to it's environment (such as where the damage is hit, how it would fall, etc.).
PhysicsTowerTeam 3 weeks ago
@Voldermort365 So, no matter how you hit it, it would always fall according to one or a few scripted events. This also allows for better performance (since all the computer has to do is move pieces from one place to another and add particles).
It may look better (since it's scripted, and they have programs/computers dedicated to make those look as real and good as possible), but having it in real time is slightly more impressive and realistic.
PhysicsTowerTeam 3 weeks ago
@PhysicsTowerTeam The devs obviously did what they wanted to with their engine. They chose to limit the engine, so you can't judge it as what it COULD'VE been. Judge it for what it is, which is the game ¬¬
SuperFunnyman001 2 weeks ago
@SuperFunnyman001 Yes, for the GAME.You know their are people who are dedicated, and work on the engines themselves for a living (CE2 and CE3). They create work that looks graphically better as well. When you create 'art', you don't have to worry about game play or performance issues. Trust me there is a difference :)
PhysicsTowerTeam 2 weeks ago
@PhysicsTowerTeam Whats your point? Unless you're just an idiot trying to start an argument over something when you obviously don't understand the difference between a game and it's engine.
SuperFunnyman001 2 weeks ago
@SuperFunnyman001 I'm just trying to say it doesn't really matter what the engine is. They are all basically the same. It comes down to the developer to decide what to do with it. If they are aiming for graphics/art, simulation, game play, etc.
What they do is obviously limited to the developer abilities. The Engine is just there to help, and the each engine provides features functions that may help the developer in certain ways, thus them choosing the engine that benefits them most. :)
PhysicsTowerTeam 2 weeks ago
@PhysicsTowerTeam What has that got to do with anything? You said first you hate it when people judge engines by the games running that engine, which makes no sense as an engine which supports some basic level of destruction (like CryEngine 2 and 3) wouldn't need that feature for a game like Crysis, which is just run and gun with a little strategy needed for dumb AI.
SuperFunnyman001 2 weeks ago
@SuperFunnyman001 I'm sure I understand you clearly. An engine is a 3-D tool, to create things like games and simulation. They are all basically the same. What differs between them is the features and functions they offer. (i.e. CE3 has Sandbox and Flowgraphs, but a horrible asset pipeline system, while Source has an excellent asset pipeline system, is matured, by outdated).
PhysicsTowerTeam 2 weeks ago
@SuperFunnyman001 People are biased when understanding the engine. They think if a game running the engine has destruction/good graphics, they will usually relate destruction/good graphics to the engine, and think the engine dominates in that area.
In reality, all engines are the same. It depends on the developer on what they do with the engine. If they want to create destruction, dynamic water, or anything else, it can be done with any engine, even if it's natively supported or not.
PhysicsTowerTeam 2 weeks ago
@SuperFunnyman001 Developers never choose engines by graphics, it's games, etc. They choose them by the tools offered by the engine to help create what ever they want (such as games). Each engine is different in this area, and depending on how and what they want to make, it differs.
An engine should really be judged from the development side, where things really matter.
Also, sorry for the tripple posts :P
PhysicsTowerTeam 2 weeks ago
@PhysicsTowerTeam I don't know why you'll telling me this, cause I know it >.< But devs choose engines by the gameplay mechanics available to the engine, which is why SDKs like UDK and Source are becomming more and more popular.
If anything can be rendered in any engine, are you telling me someone could create Far Cry 3 visuals on the old Doom engine? No.
SuperFunnyman001 2 weeks ago
@SuperFunnyman001 Game play mechanics are also based on the developer. They can code them. You don't need a specific engine. Again, this is based on the developer.
Doom Engine: It isn't technically a 3-D engine. But if someone could be nifty, they could create Far Cry 3 Environments, if they modify the code and put in high res textures. Also, graphics shouldn't be a priority--development and costs are.
Also, I mean't "I don't think I understand you clearly". I forgot to put that in.
PhysicsTowerTeam 2 weeks ago
@PhysicsTowerTeam because crysis realtime super physics destruction on ultra = super lag if you don't have a 3000 rig....
dragonxanimation 6 days ago
@dragonxanimation That's why I said 'Scripted' ;)
Check on the CryDEV Wiki. Exact simple instructions for lag-free scripted physics.
PhysicsTowerTeam 6 days ago
@Iboshido With the .....of UDK. Nothing comes to mind actually. The easy level editing?
prodigyset420 1 month ago
@Iboshido ps the endines doen't make the graphics.. they make the models you make look better because of physics and different things. It makes the models seem real. You can make UDK look good too.. but it doesn't feel the same as Cry or Frostbite
prodigyset420 1 month ago
@Iboshido Nah, just Frostbite 2. It's the first engine with quasi-realtime radiosity.
dekuscrubbyfan888 1 month ago
@Iboshido Combine Cryengine 3's graphics, Source's physics, Frostbite's destruction and The powder toy's Chemistry, what do you get? life. in videogame mode.
DesertStormer27 1 month ago
@Iboshido Frostbite 2's destruction isn't that huge imo. CryEngine has a better destruction system I believe... But yeah BF3 is the shit :P
SuperBattlefieldGuy 1 month ago
@Iboshido Note: 1:10
lWatchedThis 3 weeks ago
@Iboshido FrostBite 2 is Not Good its a Stupid Rubbish!
NSaifJason 3 weeks ago
@NSaifJason lol cod fanboy in da house
Iboshido 2 weeks ago
@Iboshido You dont have to be CoD fanboy to realize that frostbite 2 is rubbish. Ye its awesome but its brand new and got tons of bugs in, so I actually prefer to play CoD with stupid but stable engine insted BF3 with cool but bugged engine. Its fucking up the game.
ColdBloodedMonsters 2 weeks ago
@ColdBloodedMonsters let me gues u only played the beta, dont you? Try bf3 now... no grafic bugs anymore
Iboshido 2 weeks ago
2009? We don't even have graphics like these here in 2015, all the console's faults.
ZedNassah 1 month ago
Cryengine 3 uses the Frosbite 2 engine as a mop.
TheRinzl3r 1 month ago
stop complaining about bad graphics for pc...you have your sandbox editor and make your own maps and use all the potentials of cryengine...don't mind other trolls.. IMO Cryengine 3 has the best SSAO and best render engine there is. credits go to Vladimir Kajalin and crytek developers
naborghsoj08 1 month ago
MW4 To be Dead now!!
gMemo92 1 month ago
It's quite scary. When you look at real life it looks werid but when looking at game like Cyrsis you look at something much more detailed and better. While still using your eyes. .. 0_0.. kinda of weird.
gMemo92 1 month ago
I want to kill myself because now I think i am in a video game within a video game by watching this. Am I still dreaming?
RumbleM0NKEY 2 months ago
@RumbleM0NKEY yes you are, its called videogameception
pimnas 1 month ago
mw4 with cryengine 3 now!
MataBits 2 months ago
mw4 with cryengine 4 now!
MataBits 2 months ago
Video Games are just a few generations away of perfectly emulating the vision of the real world.
zemc77 2 months ago
a friend of mine burned out his xbox on C2. not impressed. i burned out a $2500 custom built monster of a computer on crysis(1). im (very) upset, yet still impressed that the '07 game has better... well, everything. but this. hell ill need rehab because i will get confused on what is reality....
Gundam00kyrios 2 months ago
GTA V
Earl1904 2 months ago
Wow, Crysis 2 is garbage next to this, and all because it was made for consoles.
AbsoluteZ3R0 2 months ago
On PC it will look even better!
SilentNZL 2 months ago
Beautiful as this is, I can't get excited until I hear about a really great immersive game that's going to use it. I'd love to play a plot-driven RPG with this much eye candy, not a mindless shooter.
tomsega 2 months ago
@tomsega I agree. Why is it that shooters have to have all of the good graphics? I find them so boring
AbsoluteZ3R0 2 months ago
Crysis 2 makes the engine look like a waste, and runs like shit on consoles.. Crysis is still one of the most beautiful games I've ever seen, Frostbite 2 destruction side kinda sucks, the lightning of the engine is superb though.
showrider99 2 months ago
@showrider99 frostibite lightning is nowhere close to cryengines
Levente20 2 months ago
Comment removed
sami3219 2 months ago
thats cod Run and gun Kideeooos
Mattias3d1 2 months ago
Cry Engine = Crytek Engine, is Left 4 Dead a Crytek game ? No.
Backtracer1 2 months ago
but not In real game ...
InFxo2 2 months ago
Frostbite 2 Owns This shit
TransDrive50 2 months ago
@TransDrive50 Fuck frostbite, its an piece of shit, crytek 3 is way better than frostbite 2
BRBSHUTUPNOOB 2 months ago
@BRBSHUTUPNOOB HAHA LLOL Frostbite 2 is the best engine so far ever seen BF3
TransDrive50 2 months ago
@TransDrive50 i love bf3 too, but if they mixed FB2 and crytek it would be the best engine ever
BRBSHUTUPNOOB 2 months ago
which games use this?
SuperSupermanX1999 2 months ago
@SuperSupermanX1999 crysis 2 uses cryengine 3
DarkPker123 2 months ago
Crytek, why did you make consoles the lead platform? We could have gotten an overall better game, since you insist that the engine has real-time multiplatform editing. But no, you put all of your resources to make console quality textures and levels. Sorry, but your "High-Res" texture pack sucks. I like MaLDo's HD Mod better, since it is a true high-resolution texture pack.
Bluedonut1 2 months ago
imagine if minecraft operated on this
baracki4 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is the most BIGGEST SHIT EVER fuck this crap
michaderstricha 3 months ago
CHECK!!! test on low-end laptop watch?v=wAcgTouJqGs
WhitePlayer3D 3 months ago
Guys Left 4 dead 3 is going to use this engine !
abduboy 3 months ago
@abduboy trololol
Sukkasanteri 3 months ago
@Sukkasanteri Dude I am not trolling -.- Go google for it ....
abduboy 3 months ago
@abduboy l4d series for valves own and theyr using always .. ALWAYSE their own game engine. dont believe everything u read in internet.
Sukkasanteri 3 months ago
Cryengine 3 and Frostbite 2 are the two best engines.
Prullenbak9 3 months ago
@Prullenbak9 i would have to say 3 best engines as UDK is such a user freindly platform! its so easy to create stunning enviroments and you can download from their website without even an account!
PureXgameplay 3 months ago
they are gonna use cryeninge3 on androids 2 soon
GreenBoyDope 3 months ago
Cool. But too expensive for me..
therealwouter 3 months ago
Looks like life needs to update to CryEngine 3
julio8492nd 3 months ago 93
Wow...
glpace 3 months ago
unfortunately technology only gets better with war : /
valmanzar16 4 months ago
@valmanzar16 What on earth do you mean by that..? What does war have to do with the CryEngine? How would a war advance video game tech?
Unspollidquill 3 months ago
@Unspollidquill lol, i mean that the games that show out the full power of the engine are mostly shooters. crysis, battlefield 3, gears of war, etc.
valmanzar16 3 months ago
@valmanzar16 Ah I see! :P Well its a concept that sells a lot, maybe that's why... Maybe its the reason gamers want simple goals, ie kill all the bad guys, but yeah its a shame we don't have more variety in video games, lets hope it will get better tho. :)
Unspollidquill 3 months ago
@Unspollidquill thanks for understanding :)
valmanzar16 3 months ago
unfortunately this is just a tech demo and not the real crysis 2
frank1nbeanz 4 months ago
Crap, it's gonna be waaay too hard to make a map on Timesplitters 4 if it's gonna run this engine...
VuileTeef 4 months ago
I liked CryEngine 2 better
failtropolis 4 months ago
Some day we'll look out the window and say, "*laughs* my computer has better graphics!" xD
Sgtbobtwo 4 months ago 115
@Sgtbobtwo then that means we will have horrible vision.
Nuclearkiwi2 2 months ago
@Nuclearkiwi2 true true!
TheMaristBoy 2 months ago
Frostbite 2 pwns this
nascar51523fan 4 months ago
FAKE !! anyone hold an camera out of an helicopter ... ^^
03nisnac03 4 months ago
i wish it were in gta 5
jurasino5 4 months ago
I hate how much blur this engine and game haves
gamer3386 4 months ago
I hate it when the top comment is a reply (sigh)
(clicks View all comments)
1 hour later......
Still nothing....
(sigh)
killerbumble 4 months ago
@killerbumble View all comments (sigh) + Ctrl F (sigh) = WIn (sigh)
8Corei7 4 months ago
yeah ok i see the engine..now make timesplitters 4 with it god dammit!
rioulduke2 4 months ago
The face is amazing !!!
JawaRider1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Cryengine 2 is better.I am not trolling I'm just telling the truth.
MoterCrozz 4 months ago
Cry engine 3 looks fucking amazing crysis 2 for consoles...
pijef 4 months ago
@pijef Sub-hd, pop-in and constant framedrops...
uninterestingentity 4 months ago
polygones?
sammelief1 4 months ago
i find ti difficult that any1 would have the nerves to put these ppl down, and they gave us the cry engine 2 for free, there is no flippen reason any1 should be complaining.
OddCrysis 4 months ago
I love this program but its driving me crazy I can't figure out how to use one of my custom made character models as the player! :(
bathorysthroat 4 months ago
Too bad my computer is such a failure. I'd like to use it in connection with Blender, but it's impossible on single cored PC with GPU from 2001 ...
Hiddenus1 5 months ago
@Hiddenus1 part time jobs :)
kaiserdragon33 4 months ago
@kaiserdragon33 yeah... I do such thing, but even one simple render in HD resolution takes 5 hours so...
And I don't have 3.0 Pixel Shader :P
But why I tell you something, about what you don't care? :D
Hiddenus1 4 months ago
@Hiddenus1 i meant working a part time job so at least you can buy a new rig sooner :D and i care cuz i've cried for a new computer for 5 years untill i bought mine with my own money ^^
kaiserdragon33 4 months ago
New Pirates of the Caribbean game would look beautiful on this engine!
What do you think?
ivanfrakin 5 months ago
The graphics were so high my laptop started foaming at the sides.
biggydx 5 months ago
But the engine is not free like the Unreal Engine 3
Dmt4030 5 months ago
@Dmt4030 Is now. You can download the free SDK but like the Unreal Engine 3 you have to pay for commercial use.
DarkKobra0202 5 months ago
@Dmt4030 Yes it is... The is an free SDK for cryengine
ZwingsTV 5 months ago
what is that game at 0;35?
BRBSHUTUPNOOB 5 months ago
nice but unlike unity you cannot actually make alot of money without anyone interfering. I have made over £200 just from a few character models
KelanX 5 months ago
finished him 8D
gbadsgames 5 months ago
TXH FOR FREE CE3! I'm very young programist, and CE3 can help me in my school!
I love you Crytek! <3
bzyk36 5 months ago
who noticed that in every Machinima upload there is always an annotation that comes for a split second saying "FINISH HIM!!"
advent1013 5 months ago
I want a gun that shoots lights.
TheOutletGroup 5 months ago
cry engine is one of the best engine out there..~
blueseeker93 5 months ago
CryEngine Nailed us pretty hard. They say there would be an sandbox on Ps3 and XBOX, but once the day i got it i wasnt so excited anymore because alot of what they sed like destroyable environment wasnt true, The multiplayer sucked also. but The story was very VERY nice!
janusafghanus 5 months ago
Too bad most of this footage wasnt added into the game, i heard before the game was released that [1:06] alleyway in that china town would be in the game.
Noobkilla99786 5 months ago
wow it can do all that, but will it blend?
coolblueforever 5 months ago
Fuck you consoles!
MegaHolymoly 5 months ago
Great work guys ar..............
kavindarochana 5 months ago
The source sdk is now free, just google it. The only restriction being that you can't publish your creation commercially.
GameplayFlicks 5 months ago
@GameplayFlicks There is a independent game commercial license where they take 20% of revenue from the start.
JoathusWow 5 months ago
very nice but can it render a nuclear explosion with no frame rate suppression
marinehavens 5 months ago
I see that there is no top comment so
Pickle
DestroyerBWH 5 months ago 85
@DestroyerBWH Birthday Nugget
xHeavyweaponzguyx 4 months ago
@DestroyerBWH shut the f*** up.
INYO121277 4 months ago
MAXIMUM GAME + MAXIMUM GFX = CRYTEK
solimaniv 5 months ago
@solimaniv CRYTEK.......Maximum.........GAME
EWTRgaming 5 months ago
@EWTRgaming AGREED
solimaniv 5 months ago
Wait so how does it change the graphics from PC to consoles. This stuff makes my brain wanna explode.
Unit645 5 months ago
mann if only i had that editing program..
stpvtsnake 5 months ago
CRYTEK = GERMAN COMPANY
UnknownWebUser 5 months ago
@UnknownWebUser You know those Germans make good stuff.
zteven3000 5 months ago